Adult and Pediatric Food Allergy to Chickpea, Pea, Lentil, and Lupine: A Scoping Review

Legume Allergens Pea, Chickpea, Lentil, Lupine and Beyond

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

In the last decade, an increasing trend towards a supposedly healthier vegan diet could be observed. However, recently, more cases of allergic reactions to plants and plant-based products such as meat-substitution products, which are often prepared with legumes, were reported. Here, we provide the current knowledge on legume allergen sources and the respective single allergens. We answer the question of which legumes beside the well-known food allergen sources peanut and soybean should be considered for diagnostic and therapeutic measures.

RECENT FINDINGS

These "non-priority" legumes, including beans, pea, lentils, chickpea, lupine, cowpea, pigeon pea, and fenugreek, are potentially new important allergen sources, causing mild-to-severe allergic reactions. Severe reactions have been described particularly for peas and lupine. An interesting aspect is the connection between anaphylactic reactions and exercise (food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis), which has only recently been highlighted for legumes such as soybean, lentils and chickpea. Most allergic reactions derive from IgE cross-reactions to homologous proteins, for example between peanut and lupine, which is of particular importance for peanut-allergic individuals ignorant to these cross-reactions. From our findings we conclude that there is a need for large-scale studies that are geographically distinctive because most studies are case reports, and geographic differences of allergic diseases towards these legumes have already been discovered for well-known "Big 9" allergen sources such as peanut and soybean. Furthermore, the review illustrates the need for a better molecular diagnostic for these emerging non-priority allergen sources to evaluate IgE cross-reactivities to known allergens and identify true allergic reactions.

A comprehensive review of processing, functionality, and potential applications of lentil proteins in the food industry

There is a pressing need for sustainable sources of proteins to address the escalating food demands of the expanding global population, without damaging the environment. Lentil proteins offer a more sustainable alternative to animal-derived proteins (such as those from meat, fish, eggs, or milk). They are abundant, affordable, protein rich, nutritious, and functional, which makes them highly appealing as ingredients in the food, personal care, cosmetics, pharmaceutical and other industries. In this article, the chemical composition, nutritional value, and techno-functional properties of lentil proteins are reviewed. Then, recent advances on the extraction, purification, and modification of lentil proteins are summarized. Hurdles to the widespread utilization of lentil proteins in the food industry are highlighted, along with potential strategies to surmount these challenges. Finally, the potential applications of lentil protein in foods and beverages are discussed. The intention of this article is to offer an up-to-date overview of research on lentil proteins, addressing gaps in the knowledge related to their potential nutritional benefits and functional advantages for application within the food industry. This includes exploring the utilization of lentil proteins as nanocarriers for bioactive compounds, emulsifiers, edible inks for 3D food printing, meat analogs, and components of biodegradable packaging.

Food allergy - New risks through vegan diet? Overview of new allergen sources and current data on the potential risk of anaphylaxis

A vegan diet is increasingly en vogue, i.e., a diet based on plants, in which animal products are completely avoided, often for health and environmental reasons. The menu is supplemented with pulses (e.g., soy, lentils, peas), nuts (e.g., cashew, macadamia, almond, pecan, para, walnut) and seeds (e.g., chia, flaxseed) or pseudo-grains (quinoa, buckwheat). Indeed, the product range is expanding to include vegan foods such as milk alternatives (e.g., oat, almond, soy drinks) and cheese or meat substitutes (e.g., soy-based). Food allergies are also on the rise, with an increasing prevalence worldwide. It is worthy of note that the main allergens of anaphylactic reactions to food in adults are predominantly of plant origin, mainly pulses and nuts - the very foods that form the main source of protein in the vegan diet. In this context, allergies to storage proteins (e.g., Gly m 5 and Gly m 6 from soya beans) can lead to severe anaphylactic reactions, while highly processed substitute products containing plant protein isolates (e.g., pea flour) in concentrated form continue to be of particular concern and may therefore be allergologically problematic. In this article, we aim to provide an overview of allergens and emerging allergen sources in vegan foods and highlight the anaphylaxis risk of the vegan diet.

Nahrungsmittelallergie - Neue Risiken durch vegane Ernährung? Überblick zu neuen Allergenquellen und aktuelle Daten zum Anaphylaxierisiko: Food allergy - New risks through vegan diet? Overview of new allergen sources and current data on the potential risk of anaphylaxis

Zunehmend mehr Menschen ernähren sich aus gesundheitlichen und Umweltaspekten ausschließlich von pflanzlichen Nahrungsmitteln (vegan). Dabei werden vielfach Hülsenfrüchte (wie Soja, Linsen, Erbsen), Schalenfrüchte (Cashew, Macadamia, Mandel, Pekan‐, Para‐ und Walnuss), Samen und Saaten (wie Chia, Leinsamen) oder (Pseudo‐)Getreide (wie Quinoa, Buchweizen) verzehrt. Vegane Milchalternativen sind Hafer‐, Mandel‐ und Sojadrinks, auch Käse‐ sowie Fleischersatzprodukte basieren oft auf einer Sojagrundlage. Gleichzeitig nimmt die Prävalenz von Nahrungsmittelallergien weltweit zu. Pflanzenallergene aus Hülsen‐ und Schalenfrüchten, die in der veganen Ernährung die Hauptproteinquelle ausmachen, zählen zu den häufigsten Auslösern von Nahrungsmittelallergien bei Erwachsenen. Dabei kommt es bei Allergien auf Speicherproteine (wie Gly m 5 und Gly m 6 aus der Sojabohne) zu teils schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen. Besonderes Augenmerk liegt weiter auf hochverarbeiteten Ersatzprodukten, die Pflanzenproteinisolate (zum Beispiel Erbsenmehl) in konzentrierter Form enthalten und damit allergologisch problematisch werden können. In diesem Artikel geben wir einen Überblick über wichtige Allergene und neue Allergenquellen in ausgesuchten veganen Nahrungsmitteln und betrachten die vegane Ernährung unter allergologischen Aspekten.

New arrivals in anaphylaxis to foods

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

More people are excluding wheat from their diet, or turning to a more sustainable diet in which includes meat substitutes or is mainly or wholly plant-based. This increases the availability of new foods and with it the increasing likelihood of novel allergens.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a growing body of evidence which suggests that allergies to seeds and legumes are increasing potentially due to their use in concentrated form in vegan or health foods. Insects can be a sustainable source of protein, but mealworm could provoke symptoms in individuals sensitized or allergic to shellfish or house dust mite. Novel plant food allergens such as gibberellin-regulated proteins and thaumatin-like proteins are increasingly being reported as significant causes of severe reactions to fruits.

SUMMARY

these findings make it even more imperative to take a full dietary history to ensure apparent idiopathic anaphylaxis is not in reality due to a novel food, especially in cases where other forms of the food are tolerated. Given the lack of diagnostic tests for these novel foods, a prick-to-prick skin prick test should be performed with the suspected food. There is currently more work needed to define and sequence many of the allergens involved.

High prevalence of lupin allergy among patients with peanut allergy: Identification of γ-conglutin as major allergen

BACKGROUND

Lupin is a protein-rich legume with a growing presence in the food market worldwide. With increased consumption, lupin allergy (LA) reports are also rising. Uncertainties exist on the cross-reactivity between peanut and lupin, the allergenic potential of different lupin species, and sensitization patterns among different populations.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the molecular basis of LA and to determine lupin allergens from 3 different species that may be involved in peanut allergy (PA) cross-reactivity.

METHODS

A total of 43 subjects with PA, those with LA, or controls without food allergy were evaluated with skin prick tests (SPTs) and specific IgEs (sIgEs). Lupin-sensitized subjects were offered a lupin oral food challenge (OFC). Immunoblots and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were performed on sera from lupin-sensitized subjects.

RESULTS

In this study, 44% of the PA subjects were confirmed to have LA by OFC. Anaphylaxis was the most frequent manifestation after lupin consumption, with a minimal eliciting dosage of 1 g lupin flour. There was no difference in lupin sIgE or SPT wheal size between lupin-sensitized and confirmed LA subjects or in the severity of symptoms among confirmed LA subjects. Sera from lupin-sensitized subjects uniformly reacted to all 3 different lupin species. Immunoblotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays revealed immunoglobulin E binding to α- and γ-conglutin in all analyzed sera, whereas α- and β-conglutin recognition was variable.

CONCLUSION

Our findings reveal a high prevalence of LA among PA subjects, emphasizing lupin must be labeled as an allergen in foods. Owing to high variability in lupin-sIgE and lupin-SPT results, LA diagnosis may require OFC. In our population, γ-conglutin is the major allergen of lupin.

Allergenic risk assessment of cowpea and its cross-reactivity with pea and peanut

BACKGROUND

Novel protein sources can represent a risk for allergic consumers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the allergenicity of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), an increasingly consumed legume and potential new industrial food ingredient which may put legume-allergic patients at risk.

METHODS

Children with allergy to legumes associated to peanut (LP group: n = 13) or without peanut allergy (L group: n = 14) were recruited and sensitization to several legumes including cowpea was assessed by prick tests and detection of specific IgE (sIgE). Cowpea protein extract was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting, IgE-reactive spots were subjected to mass spectrometry. IgE-cross-reactivity between cowpea, pea, and peanut was determined using ELISA inhibition assays. Basophil activation tests were performed to evaluate sensitivity and reactivity of patient basophils toward legumes.

RESULTS

Prick tests and sIgE levels to cowpea were positive in 8/14 and 4/13 patients of the L group and in 9/13 and 10/13 patients of the LP group, respectively. Four major IgE-binding proteins were identified as vicilins and seed albumin. Cowpea extract and its vicilin fraction strongly inhibited IgE-binding to pea and peanut extract. Peanut, lentil, and pea were the strongest activators of basophils, followed by cowpea, soybean, mung bean, and lupin.

CONCLUSION

A majority of patients with legume allergy were sensitized to cowpea proteins. Four novel allergens were identified in cowpea, among which storage proteins were playing an important role in IgE-cross-reactivity, exposing legume-allergic patients to the risk of clinical cross-reactivity to cowpea and thus adding cowpea to the group of nonpriority legumes that are not subjected to allergen labeling such as chickpea, pea, and lentil.

Peanut, soy, and emerging legume allergy in Canada

Background

Individuals with 1 legume allergy may be cosensitized to other legumes and thus may potentially have other legume allergies as well. Although the use of emerging legumes (eg, pea, lentils, chickpeas) in commercial food production is increasingly common, the literature has largely focused on peanut and soy, both of which are priority allergens in Canada.

Objective

We aimed to describe the distribution of priority and emerging legume allergies in Canada, with consideration for patient age.

Methods

Cross-sectional survey data collected between 2019 and 2021 from families who follow food allergy-related social media platforms were queried for demographics, as well as for food allergy (including by type and number of foods and by age [0-5 vs ≥6 years]). Data were described and then analyzed by using logistic regression and adjusted for sex, age at diagnosis, and number of food allergies.

Results

Of the 115 participating children, the majority (64.6%) were boys. Nearly all of the children (109 of 115 [94.8%]) had peanut allergy, whereas soy and emerging legume allergies were reported by 15.7% and 13.0% of the children, respectively. Of these 115 children, 85 had mono-peanut allergy, 6 had mono-soy allergy, none had emerging legume allergy in the absence of peanut or soy, 12 had peanut and emerging legume allergy, 9 had peanut and soy allergy, and 3 had peanut, soy, and emerging legume allergy. Compared with children aged 0 to 5 years, children aged 6 years or older were significantly less likely to have peanut plus soy or emerging legume allergy (odds ratio = 0.22 [95% CI = 0.05-0.94]; P = .04).

Conclusion

Of the children with peanut allergy, a considerable number also had peanut allergy and soy allergy and/or another legume allergy. Younger children have higher odds of multiple legume allergy.

vACcine COnfidence amongst those living with alleRgy during the COVID pandemic (ACCORD): a scoping review protocol

Background

Reports of allergic reactions to the COVID-19 vaccines have been documented, which may also contribute to hesitancy. Despite the low likelihood that the COVID-19 vaccine will trigger an allergic reaction, we and others have reported that families with allergy remain vaccine hesitant due to concerns of COVID-19-vaccine-triggered anaphylaxis.

Objective

To present our scoping review protocol, that will inform a forthcoming living scoping review in which we will investigate the peer-reviewed and grey literature on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and allergic disease and/or allergic reactions following a COVID-19 vaccine.

Methods

Informed by Arksey and O’Malley framework for methodological review, we have developed a search strategy with content and methodological experts, and which has undergone Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies review. A search of four scientific databases, as well as gray literature, will be performed without restriction to articles by type of COVID-19 vaccine, or country of study, and will include publications in the ten languages our team can handle. Bi-monthly search alerts based on the search strategy will be generated.

Results

The first search will result in a stand alone peer reviewed scoping review. Bi-monthly updates will be posted on a pre-print server. Depending on the volume of literature, these updates will be synthesized and submitted for peer-review at 6 and/or 12 months.

Conclusion

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy amongst individuals with allergy persists, despite very low risk of serious adverse reactions. Our living scoping review, which includes multiple forms of knowledge translation, will be a rigorous way to address hesitancy.

The need for a food allergy educator program for allied healthcare professionals in Canada

Owing to a collaborative approach to patient care, and a paucity of allergists in Canada, there is a need to develop a food allergy educational program for allied health care professionals in Canada. Such programs already exist in the United States and Britain. Herein, we describe the outcomes of recent conference proceedings to inform the educational needs for such a program. As part of the 76th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (CSACI), held virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we hosted a virtual workshop on the need for a food allergy educator program for Canadian allied health professionals. This workshop was co-developed with the CSACI and an industry partner, and featured allergy specialist dietitians. Attendance was open to all conference delegates, and to allied health professionals. As part of the registration process, registrants posed diverse food allergy-related questions, ranging from how to use an epinephrine autoinjector, to daily management and, how to cure food allergy. A national food allergy educator program will empower both allergy and non-allergy specialist healthcare professionals to appropriately counsel patients. This virtually-delivered program will begin to close a gap in healthcare access resulting from the geographic size of Canada, as it will enhance allied healthcare providers' confidence to provide evidence-based food allergy care appropriately for those with food allergy.

A practical focus on legume oral immunotherapy

Legumes other than peanut are an important source of protein and consist of a wide variety of species, such as soy, peas, chickpeas, lentils, and lupin. Due to their health benefits and the rising popularity of veganism, legume consumption has increased. Legume allergy, cross-sensitization, and cross-reactivity between different species have been reported in the literature and are increasingly recognized. Unlike peanut, oral immunotherapy (OIT) for nonpeanut legumes has not been well studied and published protocols are lacking. Future studies are needed to provide real-world data on the safety and effectiveness of nonpeanut legume OIT, and whether desensitization to one legume leads to desensitization to other legumes in patients with multiple legume allergy. Nevertheless, due to the abundance of clinical trial and real-world data for peanut OIT, it is reasonable to use protocols that substitute peanut protein with other legume protein when desensitizing individuals with nonpeanut legume allergy. Clinicians who are starting to offer legume OIT in their practices may consider starting with preschoolers, an age group for whom real-world data has shown the greatest safety and effectiveness.

Alternatives to Cow’s Milk-Based Infant Formulas in the Prevention and Management of Cow’s Milk Allergy

Cow’s milk-based infant formulas are the most common substitute to mother’s milk in infancy when breastfeeding is impossible or insufficient, as cow’s milk is a globally available source of mammalian proteins with high nutritional value. However, cow’s milk allergy (CMA) is the most prevalent type of food allergy among infants, affecting up to 3.8% of small children. Hypoallergenic infant formulas based on hydrolysed cow’s milk proteins are commercially available for the management of CMA. Yet, there is a growing demand for more options for infant feeding, both in general but especially for the prevention and management of CMA. Milk from other mammalian sources than the cow, such as goat, sheep, camel, donkey, and horse, has received some attention in the last decade due to the different protein composition profile and protein amino acid sequences, resulting in a potentially low cross-reactivity with cow’s milk proteins. Recently, proteins from plant sources, such as potato, lentil, chickpeas, quinoa, in addition to soy and rice, have gained increased interest due to their climate friendly and vegan status as well as potential lower allergenicity. In this review, we provide an overview of current and potential future infant formulas and their relevance in CMA prevention and management.

Allergic reactions to emerging food allergens in Canadian children

Most Canadian food allergy data has focused on Health Canada’s priority food allergens. This study describes which non-priority (emerging) food allergens were most commonly reported by Canadian parents and categorized/confirmed by allergists. A secondary aim was to describe severity of allergic reactions to emerging allergens. Parents reported allergic reactions to emerging food allergens experienced by their child (< 18 years) which occurred in the past 12 months, and allergists categorized/confirmed them according to likelihood of IgE-mediated food allergy. Of 68 eligible patients completing the survey, the most commonly reported emerging allergens were fruits/vegetables (58.8%), seeds (22.1%), legumes (19.1%) and other (11.8%). Median allergist ranking for legumes was ‘probable’ IgE-mediated food allergy, ‘possible’ for seeds and fruits/vegetables, and ‘unlikely’ for other. Median reaction severity was mild for legumes, and moderate for seeds, fruits/vegetables, and other. Our study highlights that non-priority food allergens, namely legumes and seeds, can lead to probable/likely allergic reactions in Canadian children. These food allergens are increasing in popularity in the Canadian diet, which could lead to increasing reports of allergic reactions. More research is needed to confirm reports of reactions to emerging allergens, and to document their inclusion as ingredients in packaged foods.

A UHPLC-MS/MS Method for the Detection of Meat Substitution by Nine Legume Species in Emulsion-Type Sausages

Meat substitution by legume proteins in various types of meat products is a common practice. A reliable detection and quantification of these additives is required to control food specifications, especially regarding food fraud. Consequently, a UHPLC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous detection of alfalfa (Medicago sativa), broad bean (Vicia faba), chickpea (Cicer arietinum), lentil (Lens culinaris), lupine (Lupinus albus and Lupinus angustifolius), pea (Pisum sativum), peanut (Arachis hypogaea), and soy (Glycine max) proteins in meat products was developed. After protein extraction and tryptic digestion, three marker peptides for each legume species were measured by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) using an optimized extraction protocol. To the best of our knowledge, the marker peptides for alfalfa, broad bean, chickpea, and lentil have not been reported previously. Emulsion-type sausages with 0.1, 0.4, 0.7, 1.0, 1.3, 1.6, 1.9, 2.2, and 2.5% meat substitution by each legume species, representing the concentration range between inadvertently transferred cross-contaminations and the conscious use for meat substitution, were produced for matrix calibration. No false-positive results were recorded in blank samples. In the quantification of alfalfa, broad bean, chickpea, lentil, pea, peanut, and soy, 673 of 756 measuring data of the recovery rate in unknown sausages were in the accepted range of 80–120%.