Pancreatic incidentalomas: high rate of potentially malignant tumors

Challenges of Managing Type 3c Diabetes in the Context of Pancreatic Resection, Cancer and Trauma

Type 3c diabetes mellitus (T3cDM), also known as pancreatogenic or pancreoprivic diabetes, is a specific type of DM that often develops as a result of diseases affecting the exocrine pancreas, exhibiting an array of hormonal and metabolic characteristics. Several pancreatic exocrine diseases and surgical procedures may cause T3cDM. Diagnosing T3cDM remains difficult as the disease characteristics frequently overlap with clinical presentations of type 1 DM (T1DM) or type 2 DM (T2DM). Managing T3cDM is likewise challenging due to numerous confounding metabolic dysfunctions, including pancreatic endocrine and exocrine insufficiencies and poor nutritional status. Treatment of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency is of paramount importance when managing patients with T3cDM. This review aims to consolidate the latest information on surgical etiologies of T3cDM, focusing on partial pancreatic resections, total pancreatectomy, pancreatic cancer and trauma.

Hidden Threat: Incidental Finding of Pancreatic Body Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor During Bariatric Evaluation With an Open Central Pancreatectomy Resolution

Incidentalomas, or tumors found incidentally, are very common. However, pancreatic tumors are usually not found as incidentalomas. To date, these tumors represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, since the risks and benefits associated with surgeries that can be performed to remove these tumors must be evaluated due to perioperative complications. It is vitally important to always carry out a correct approach that includes a histopathological study to allow timely identification of tumors that require surgical management or other preoperative treatment, such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The majority of these tumors are benign cystic tumors; however, there are cases, like the one presented here, where the tumor turns out to be a solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) that requires a different diagnostic and surgical approach. Also, in this case, the importance of evaluating the patient's general health status is highlighted to determine whether or not the required surgery can be performed at that moment or if any prior intervention is required. This case report talks about a patient in whom an incidental pancreatic tumor was found and how its management was carried out from diagnosis to the postoperative period.

A retrospective preliminary study of intrapancreatic late enhancement as a noteworthy imaging finding in the early stages of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To characterize intrapancreatic late enhancement (ILE) observed in the early stages of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC).

METHODS

Among 203 patients pathologically diagnosed with PAC between October 2011 and February 2021, 32 patients with pre-diagnostic abdominal contrast-enhanced CT performed from 6 months to 5 years before the diagnosis were enrolled in this study. Indirect findings (IFs) on pre-diagnostic CT, including ILE, were evaluated and examined for various clinical data and time intervals to diagnosis (TIDs). The detected ILE was quantitatively evaluated, and the effect of ILE awareness on lesion detection by two radiologists and their interobserver agreement were assessed.

RESULTS

Among the 32 patients, 23 showed IFs. ILE was observed in 14 patients (63%), with a median TID of 17 months (interquartile ratio [IQR]: 9.3-42.3). ILE alone was observed in eight patients (35%), ILE with focal pancreatic parenchymal atrophy (FPPA) was observed in five patients (22%), and ILE with main pancreatic duct abnormalities (MPDA) was observed in one patient (4%). Pancreatic head lesions were significantly more frequent in patients with ILE alone than in patients with FPPA or MPDA (p = 0.026). The median long-axis diameters of the region with ILE and ILE-to-pancreas contrast were 10 (IQR: 5-11) mm and 24 (IQR: 17-33) HU, respectively. Awareness of ILE led observers to detect two or three more pancreatic head lesions, and interobserver agreement increased from poor agreement (k = 0.17) to moderate agreement (k = 0.55).

CONCLUSION

ILE is a significant IF for early PAC detection.

KEY POINTS

• Intrapancreatic late enhancement (ILE) is a significant indirect finding in the early detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. • ILE without other indirect findings is expected to help detect pancreatic head lesions. • Image evaluation focusing on ILE can increase lesion detection and improve the interobserver agreement.

Pancreatic Incidentaloma

Pancreatic incidentalomas (PIs) represent a clinical entity increasingly recognized due to advances in and easier access to imaging techniques. By definition, PIs should be detected during abdominal imaging performed for indications other than a pancreatic disease. They range from small cysts to invasive cancer. The incidental diagnosis of pancreatic cancer can contribute to early diagnosis and treatment. On the other hand, inadequate management of PIs may result in overtreatment and unneeded morbidity. Therefore, there is a strong need to evaluate the nature and clinical features of individual PIs. In this review, we summarize the major characteristics related to PIs and present suggestions for their management.

Are We Undertreating Black Patients with Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors? Critical Analysis of Current Surveillance Guidelines by Race

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) survival outcomes differ by race. Current recommendations for surveillance of PNETs less than 2 cm in size are based on low malignant potential and low rates of lymph node metastases (LNM). We investigated whether these guidelines are universally applicable regardless of race.

STUDY DESIGN

A multi-institutional analysis of patients with resected, nonfunctional, sporadic PNETs was performed initially using the US Neuroendocrine Study Group dataset with the National Cancer Database as a validation dataset. Patients with distant metastatic disease were excluded from analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 453 (388 White and 65 Black) and 5,532 patients (4,772 White and 760 Black) were analyzed in the initial and validation datasets, respectively. White patients had a low incidence of LNM in tumors of less than 2 cm in both datasets (5% and 12%, respectively), which increased with tumor size. However, the incidence of LNM in Black patients was similar in the initial and validation datasets for tumors sized less than 2 cm (23% and 21%) and 2 to 3 cm (21% and 29%). Black patients had a significantly higher incidence of LNM in tumors less than 2 cm in size in the initial and validation datasets (p < 0.01) compared with White patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The current recommendation for surveillance of PNETs of less than 2 cm in size is likely based on a low rate of LNM seen in a predominantly White population. The incidence of LNM in Black patients with tumors less than 2 cm in size is clinically relevant and concerning. Current guidelines may not be universally applicable, and a more aggressive approach to resection in Black patients with small PNETs may be warranted.

Clinical features and prognostic impact of asymptomatic pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is highly lethal, and early diagnosis is challenging. Because patients who present with symptoms generally have advanced-stage diseases, analysis of asymptomatic PDAC provides invaluable information for developing strategies for early diagnosis. Here, we reviewed 577 patients with PDAC (372 diagnosed with symptoms [symptomatic group] and 205 without symptoms [asymptomatic group]) diagnosed at our institute. Among the 205 asymptomatic PDAC patients, 109 were detected during follow-up/work-up for other diseases, 61 because of new-onset or exacerbation of diabetes mellitus, and 35 in a medical check-up. Asymptomatic PDAC is characterized by smaller tumor size, earlier disease stage, and higher resectability than those of symptomatic PDAC. In 22.7% of asymptomatic cases, indirect findings, e.g., dilatation of the main pancreatic duct, triggered PDAC detection. Although pancreatic tumors were less frequently detected, overall abnormality detection rates on imaging studies were nearly 100% in asymptomatic PDAC. Asymptomatic PDAC had a better prognosis (median survival time, 881 days) than symptomatic PDAC (342 days, P < 0.001). In conclusion, diagnosis of PDAC in the asymptomatic stage is associated with early diagnosis and a better prognosis. Incidental detection of abnormal findings during the follow-up/work-up for other diseases provides important opportunities for early diagnosis of asymptomatic PDAC.

Pancreatic incidentalomas: Investigation and management

The incidence of pancreatic incidentalomas (PIs) detected in otherwise asymptomatic patients is growing with the increasing quality and use of advanced imaging techniques. PI can present as isolated main pancreatic duct dilation or as a solid or cystic lesion. Although historically thought to be relatively rare, PIs are rather common, particularly cystic lesions of the pancreas, which can be detected in up to 49% of the general population. With the poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer, PIs are an opportunity for prevention and early diagnosis, but when managed poorly, they can also lead to overtreatment and unnecessary morbidity. The management of PI should begin with a dedicated pancreas protocol computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to accurately characterize duct size, lesion characteristics and establish an accurate baseline for subsequent follow up. Diagnosis and subsequent management depends on the extent of main duct dilation and solid versus cystic appearance. Solid lesions are highly concerning for malignancy. Cystic lesions can be further categorized as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas (IPMNs) or mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs), both of which harbour malignant potential, or as serous cystic neoplasms (SCNs) that are benign. In this paper, we summarize the major challenges related to PI and present pragmatic suggestions for management.

The prevalence of pancreatic incidentalomas in patients undergoing surveillance for abdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Serial imaging in patients with aortic aneurysms may identify non-vascular disease. However, the prevalence and clinical history of pancreatic incidentalomas in this population is unknown.

METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional study of adults who underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) surveillance imaging for abdominal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm at a single academic institution between 2015 and 2020. Descriptive statistics were used for patients with pancreatic lesions.

RESULTS

Of 249 patients, 18 (7.2 %) had a pancreatic incidentaloma. Compared to patients without a lesion, those with a lesion were more likely female (50.0 % vs 24.2 %, p = 0.02) and less likely a smoker (72.2 % vs 90.0 %, p = 0.02). 3 patients with pancreatic lesions underwent intervention, and 1 patient received additional imaging. 2 patients had a surgical oncology referral.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic incidentalomas are common in patients with aortic aneurysm, but lesion characteristics and management vary. Results suggest that a multi-disciplinary approach, thorough documentation, and referral to pancreatic specialists may be warranted.

Prognostic Impact of Tumor Size on Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Recurrence May Have Racial Variance

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) has increased over the last decade. Black patients have worse survival outcomes. This study investigates whether oncologic outcomes are racially disparate at a single institution.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed on 151 patients with resected PNETs between 2010 and 2019.

RESULTS

More White males and Black females presented with PNETs (P = 0.02). White patients were older (65 years vs 60 years; P = 0.03), more likely to be married (P < 0.01), and had higher median estimated yearly incomes ($28,973 vs $17,767; P < 0.01) than Black patients. Overall and disease-free survival were not different. Black patients had larger median tumor sizes (30 mm vs 23 mm; P = 0.02). Tumor size was predictive of recurrence only for White patients (hazard ratio, 1.02; P = 0.01). Collectively, tumors greater than 20 mm in size were more likely to have recurrence (P = 0.048), but this cutoff was not predictive in either racial cohort independently.

CONCLUSIONS

Black patients undergoing curative resection of PNETs at our institution presented with larger tumors, but that increased size is not predictive of disease-free survival in this population.

Risk factors for development of diabetes mellitus (Type 3c) after partial pancreatectomy: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Type 3c diabetes mellitus (T3cDM) occurring post pancreatectomy can be challenging to treat due to the frequent combination of decreased circulating levels of insulin and glucagon and concurrent exocrine insufficiency. Relatively, little is known regarding the risk factors for development of T3cDM post pancreatectomy. Our aim was to review the literature and assess what is known of the risk factors for the development of new-onset DM following partial pancreatic resection and where possible determines the incidence, time of onset and the management approach to hyperglycaemia in this context.

DESIGN

Medline and Embase databases were reviewed using specific keyword criteria. Original manuscripts published in 1990 or later included. Articles with study population <20, lacking information on new-onset DM, follow-up duration or specifically targeting rare procedures/pathology were excluded. The Newcastle Ottawa Quality Assessment form was applied. Results reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Pooled effect size calculated using random effects model.

PATIENTS

Thirty six articles were identified that described a total of 5636 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, 3922 patients having distal pancreatectomy and 315 with central pancreatectomy.

RESULTS

The incidence of new-onset DM was significantly different between different types of resection from 9% to 24% after pancreaticoduodenectomy (pooled estimate 16%; 95% CI: 14%-17%), 3%-40% after distal pancreatectomy (pooled estimate 21%; 95% CI: 16%-25%) and 0%-14% after central pancreatectomy (pooled estimate 6%; 95% CI: 3%-9%). Surgical site, higher preoperative HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose and lower remnant pancreatic volume had strongest associations with new-onset DM.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review supports that risk of development of T3cDM is associated with type of pancreatic resection, lower remnant pancreatic volume and higher preoperative HbA1c.

Incidentally detected pancreatic adenocarcinomas on computed tomography obtained during the follow-up for other diseases

PURPOSE

To determine imaging findings of pancreatic adenocarcinomas incidentally detected on contrast-enhanced multiphasic dynamic computed tomography (CT) obtained during the follow-up for other diseases.

METHODS

From January 2007 to December 2018, 14 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinomas incidentally detected on CT obtained during the follow-up for other diseases (incidental group) and 105 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinomas symptomatically detected on ultrasound or CT (non-incidental group) were included. Imaging characteristics of the tumor were compared between the two groups. Additionally, imaging findings prior to the detection of a tumor on previous CT images in the incidental group were also assessed.

RESULTS

In cancers of the pancreas body/tail, there was a significantly smaller tumor size (median, 17 mm vs. 42 mm, p < 0.001), a significantly lower incidence of loss of fatty marbling (p = 0.025), vascular involvement (p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.046) and distant metastasis (p = 0.017), and a significantly higher incidence of preserved lobulation (p < 0.001) in the incidental group than in the non-incidental group. Regarding the cancers of the pancreas head, there were no significant differences in the radiological findings between the two groups. On previous CT images, small pancreatic nodules, secondary signs, and loss of fatty marbling tended to be the preceding findings of incidental pancreatic adenocarcinomas.

CONCLUSION

Incidentally detected pancreatic adenocarcinomas in the pancreas body/tail were characterized by an earlier tumor stage than in cases of symptomatically detected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Several CT findings prior to the detection of a tumor may be useful for the early detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma during the follow-up for other diseases.

White paper on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from society of abdominal radiology's disease-focused panel for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Part II, update on imaging techniques and screening of pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive gastrointestinal malignancy with a poor 5-year survival rate. Its high mortality rate is attributed to its aggressive biology and frequently late presentation. While surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment, only 10-20% of patients will present with surgically resectable disease. Over the past several years, development of vascular bypass graft techniques and introduction of neoadjuvant treatment regimens have increased the number of patients who can undergo resection with a curative intent. While the role of conventional imaging in the detection, characterization, and staging of patients with PDAC is well established, its role in monitoring treatment response, particularly following neoadjuvant therapy remains challenging because of the complex anatomic and histological nature of PDAC. Novel morphologic and functional imaging techniques (such as DECT, DW-MRI, and PET/MRI) are being investigated to improve the diagnostic accuracy and the ability to measure response to therapy. There is also a growing interest to detect PDAC and its precursor lesions at an early stage in asymptomatic patients to increase the likelihood of achieving cure. This has led to the development of pancreatic cancer screening programs. This article will review recent updates in imaging techniques and the current status of screening and surveillance of individuals at a high risk of developing PDAC.

Incidental pancreatic lesions - A diagnostic and management challenge

The term "incidental lesion" denotes any lesion that is diagnosed by chance, by happenstance, usually with imaging techniques for a different condition unrelated to it. The widespread use of imaging tests with ever increasing quality and availability has led to finding an ever increasing number of incidental lesions, in this case in the pancreas.

Well-differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor in a Patient With Familial Atypical Multiple Mole Melanoma Syndrome (FAMMM)

Germline mutations in CDKN2A result in Familial Atypical Multiple Mole Melanoma Syndrome (FAMMM), which is associated with an increased risk for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and melanoma. CDKN2A is somatically inactivated in multiple neoplasms, raising the possibility that, although the data are not conclusive, germline CDKN2A mutation may also impose an increased risk for other neoplasms. We present a patient with a CDKN2A germline mutation (p16-Leiden mutation) and mosaicism for neurofibromatosis type 2, who presented with a small asymptomatic pancreatic lesion, detected during endoscopic ultrasound screening of the pancreas. After resection, the lesion was found to be a well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PanNET). Molecular analysis of the tumor showed somatic loss of the second allele, supporting a causal relation of the PanNET to the underlying FAMMM syndrome. Recent data, showing the association between certain single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the CDKN2A gene and an increased incidence for PanNET, further support a role for germline CDKN2A alterations in PanNET risk. We conclude that PanNETs can be a phenotypic expression of FAMMM syndrome. This can have implications for screening and for the diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasms in carriers of germline CDKN2A mutations.

Asymptomatic versus symptomatic solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas: clinical and MDCT manifestations

BACKGROUND

To delineate the features of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) images and clinical characteristics of pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) of the pancreas in asymptomatic patients and compare these features and characteristics between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.

METHODS

This work is a retrospective study approved by our institutional review board. MDCT images and clinical data of 109 patients with pathologically proven SPTs obtained from October 2008 to October 2016 were reviewed. Patients were categorized into two groups: asymptomatic patients and patients with symptomatic disease. Cases were reviewed to determine the reason for detection, intervention, shape, diameter, location, calcification, encapsulation, internal composition, CT attenuation, enhancement pattern, and tumor pathology. Clinical factors and imaging features were also compared between groups. Statistical analysis was performed using χ2 and t-tests.

RESULTS

Data from 49 asymptomatic and 60 symptomatic patients were collected. Asymptomatic SPTs were identified most frequently during routine health examination (18 patients, 36.7%), various screening purposes (12 patients, 24.5%), and traumatic injury (9 patients, 18.4%). Except for a smaller tumor size (5.8 cm in asymptomatic SPTs vs. 7.4 cm in symptomatic SPTs, P = 0.023), the clinical factors or imaging features of asymptomatic patients were very similar to those of symptomatic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The current research is the first single-center study to characterize SPTs in asymptomatic patients. Asymptomatic SPTs are gradually being identified with greater frequency. Although generally smaller in size than that in symptomatic patients, an asymptomatic pancreatic mass with the typical imaging features of SPT may be found, the treatment for which is similar to that for symptomatic patients. Evaluating asymptomatic SPTs requires further systematic and multi-center trials.

Prevalence of pancreatic cystic neoplasms on imaging exams: association with signs of malignancy risk

Objective

To analyze the prevalence of cystic lesions of the pancreas on imaging exams and their association with signs of malignancy risk.

Materials and methods

This was an observational cross-sectional study, in which we evaluated 924 sequential computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans of the abdomen. For all of the patients included in the study, we reviewed the demographic data available in the medical records and evaluated the images.

Results

Cysts were observed in 4.5% of patients, the prevalence of cysts being highest (7.6%) in patients over 60 years of age. Lesions were detected at higher rates on magnetic resonance imaging and in patients with pancreatic symptoms (6.1% and 42.9%, respectively). Signs of malignancy risk were observed in 26.3% of the patients, more frequently in those who were male and over 60 years of age.

Conclusion

The prevalence of pancreatic cysts was 4.5%. Signs of malignancy risk were observed in 26.3% of the cystic neoplasms identified.

Risk Factors of the Recurrences of Pancreatic Solid Pseudopapillary Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) are rare neoplasms with low-grade malignancy. The main treatment for them is surgical resection. However, some SPTs relapse after resection. The risk factors associated with the recurrences of resected SPTs remain controversial to date. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the risk factors of the recurrences of pancreatic SPTs.

Materials and Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to December 2017. Studies that focused on the risk factors of postoperative relapses of pancreatic SPTs were enrolled. Combined ORs with 95% CIs were calculated to evaluate the effects of relevant factors investigated in eligible studies. Heterogeneity among combined results was assessed by Cochran's Q test and by the degree of inconsistency (I²). Statistical analyses were performed by Review Manager (version 5.3) using random effects models.

Results: We included 10 studies, which enrolled 1091 patients. The pooled results suggested that patients with larger tumors (diameter > 5cm), lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, synchronous metastasis and positive margin were prone to suffer from the recurrences of SPTs. In addition, some factors like gender, location of tumors, perineural invasion, calcification and capsular invasion did not show any correlation with the relapses of resected SPTs.

Conclusion: Factors including a larger tumor size (diameter > 5cm), lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, synchronous metastasis and positive margin may increase the risk of recurrences of resected pancreatic SPTs. All SPTs should be excised and patients with high-risk features should undergo a long-term follow-up.

Pancreatic cancer screening

PURPOSE

This article reviews the current evidence surrounding pancreatic cancer screening. The current targets of screening include identification of early pancreatic cancer, as well as the two most important precursor lesions; intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and high grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Given the relatively low incidence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the general population, patients with elevated risk based on family history or an underlying genetic syndrome are felt to be the most appropriate patients to undergo screening.

METHODS

An extensive review of the literature was performed and the major findings of the available literature regarding pancreatic screening are reviewed in detail.

RESULTS

Several prospective trials have evaluated pancreatic cancer screening in high-risk groups. The results of those trials are summarized in this article. Current consensus guidelines and recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Consortium Summit are also discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The exact benefit of pancreatic cancer screening remains unclear at this time, but emerging evidence suggests that there is a window of opportunity to detect precursor lesions and early pancreatic adenocarcinomas in high-risk patient populations. Better understanding of the pathway of carcinogenesis will hopefully improve our ability to detect early, resectable pancreatic carcinomas, and provide a mortality benefit to patients at significantly elevated risk of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Pancreatectomy for pancreatic incidentaloma: What are the risks?

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic incidentalomas (PI) are nowadays common but the benefit-risk balance of surgery remains difficult to determine.

METHODS

Monocentric retrospective study of 881 pancreatectomies comparing resected PI with symptomatic lesion. Univariate and multivariate (MV) analyses were done to identify risk factors of malignancy in PI undergoing surgery.

RESULTS

Overall, 32% of pancreatectomies were performed for PI. Median size of PI was 30 mm (vs 28 mm; p = 0.15) and 49% were cystic (vs 42%; p = 0.197). Resected PI were mostly located in distal pancreas (61% vs 34%; p < 0.001), less frequently malignant (49% vs 59%; p = 0.004). PNETs were more frequent in PI (50% vs 21%; p < 0.001). Distal pancreatectomy (36% vs 23%; p < 0.001) or parenchyma-sparing surgery (34% vs 13%; p < 0.001) were more frequently performed for PI. Overall mortality (1.1% vs 1.2%) and morbidity (70% vs 68%) were not significantly different between both groups. Severe morbidity was lower for PI (15% vs 22%; p = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, age>55 years (HR 6.14; p < 0.001), size >20 mm (HR:26.7; p < 0.001) and biliary dilatation (HR 29.9; p = 0.027) were independent risk factors of malignancy and, when associated, the likelihood of malignancy was above 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

PI represent about 30% of indications for pancreatectomy and when resected after careful selection are malignant in 50% of cases.

Decision-Making for the Management of Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas: How Satisfied Are Patients with Surgery?

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to understand patients' perspectives and satisfaction with choosing surgery for the treatment of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs).

METHODS

A 62-question survey was administered to 113 patients who had a resection for a PCL by 12 surgeons at two pancreatic specialty centers (2004-2016). Patients' final diagnoses and perioperative outcomes were correlated to the survey's results using univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Fear of cancer was quite or extremely important in most respondents' decision to have surgery (95.4%). Respondents were quite or fully satisfied with the outcomes of surgery (91.1%) and with the decision-making process (89.3%). Distress from anxiety about the cyst before surgery (58.6%) largely outweighed that from postsurgical lifestyle changes (14.4%). Furthermore, 88.7% of patients with pathologically non-malignant disease were quite or fully satisfied with their decision to have surgery, and patients with mucinous neoplasms reported high satisfaction rates independent of grade of dysplasia or malignancy (p = 0.641).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a resected PCL are highly satisfied with their decision to have surgery, regardless of the final diagnosis or clinical outcome. Fear of cancer is the main driver in the decision-making process, and the anxiety of harboring a cyst is a greater cause of distress than are postsurgical lifestyle changes.

Impact of Treatments on Diabetic Control and Gastrointestinal Symptoms After Total Pancreatectomy

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to compare the safety, efficacy, and patients' quality of life with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus multiple daily injections (MDIs) in type 3c diabetes mellitus (T3cDM) following total pancreatectomy (TP) and pancreatic enzyme usage.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with T3cDM (18 CSII patients vs 21 MDI patients) who underwent TP between 2000 and 2016 at 3 Harvard-affiliated hospitals and the University of Minnesota returned prospectively obtained questionnaires examining quality of life and both endocrine and exocrine pancreatic functions.

RESULTS

Main indications for TP were as follows: chronic pancreatitis (n = 19), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (n = 12), and adenocarcinoma (n = 4). Median hemoglobin A1c using MDIs was 8.1% versus 7.3% in CSII. Severe hypoglycemic events using MDIs were increased compared with CSII (P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in quality-of-life measures with CSII versus MDIs. Pancreatic enzyme dose per meal (P < 0.05) differed between the hospitals. Gastrointestinal symptoms and unintended weight loss (P < 0.01) were more common with low doses of pancreatic enzymes.

CONCLUSIONS

After TP, CSII therapy is safe compared with MDIs in T3cDM and not associated with an increase in severe hypoglycemic events. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy is highly variable with low doses associated with unintentional weight loss and gastrointestinal symptoms.

Asymptomatic Pancreatic Cancer: Does Incidental Detection Impact Long-Term Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in asymptomatic patients is very rare, and the clinical implication of early detection of asymptomatic PDAC remains unclear.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 569 consecutive patients with PDAC treated in our institution (250 underwent surgical resection and 319 had unresectable PDAC). The patients' demographics, tumor locations, pathologic stages, treatment, and overall survival (OS) were compared between the asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.

RESULTS

In total, 163 (29%) patients presented without subjective symptoms. These patients had an earlier stage of PDAC on presentation (p < 0.001), higher resectability rate (64 vs. 36%, p < 0.001), and higher 5-year OS rate (18 vs. 7%, p < 0.001) than patients with symptoms. Among the patients who underwent resection, asymptomatic patients did not have a significantly higher chance of complete resection (88 vs. 78%, p = 0.06) or 5-year OS rate (23 vs. 22%, p = 0.09). However, symptomatic patients more often required complex operations such as concomitant vascular resection and reconstruction (57 vs. 29%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Asymptomatic PDAC is associated with better long-term outcomes than symptomatic PDAC because of the earlier stage at presentation and higher chance of resectability. Our findings highlight the potential implication of screening programs for early detection of PDAC in selected high-risk populations.

Laparoscopic Left Pancreatectomy in the United Kingdom: Analysis of a Six-Year Experience in a Single Tertiary Center

OBJECTIVES

Laparoscopic techniques have been slow to establish a role in pancreatic surgery. Worldwide, laparoscopic left pancreatectomy (LLP) is gaining in popularity; however, there remains little published data from the United Kingdom.We aimed to evaluate the results of LLP performed in a single UK pancreatic unit.

METHODS

Patients undergoing LLP for lesions in the body and tail of the pancreas between April 2009 and April 2015 were identified. Patient records were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy was performed on 46 patients, median age, 62 years (range, 19-84). The spleen was preserved in 27 patients (93% of planned), and 6 (13%) operations were converted to open. The overall morbidity rate was 39%; 28 patients had no complications. Significant complications were seen in 7 (15%) patients; this included 3 pancreatic fistula (6.5%) and 1 mortality (2%). Median length of stay was 6 days (range, 3-28). Histology revealed 15 neuroendocrine tumors, 8 adenocarcinomas, 4 mucinous cystadenomas, 1 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, 2 metastases, and 16 other benign pathologies.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery has a low risk of significant complications. Our results offer encouragement to identify LLP as the gold standard approach for premalignant lesions. Further work should clarify the outcomes for malignant lesions.

AACE/ACE disease state clinical review: pancreatic neuroendocrine incidentalomas

Incidental detection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) has substantially increased over the last decade due to widespread use of advanced imaging studies. Reliable initial imaging-based characterization is crucial for the differential diagnosis from other exocrine neoplasms and to determine the appropriate management plan. Measurements of chromogranin A, pancreatic polypeptide, and calcitonin are recommended for the biochemical evaluation. A thorough medical history needs to be performed to rule out multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type 1. The European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS)/Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) staging system together with a grading based on the Ki-67 proliferation index and mitotic counts has proven to give more appropriate prognostic information than the World Health Organization (WHO)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging but may still fail to safely differentiate benign from malignant lesions. Poorly differentiated PNETs generally present with metastases and are rarely amenable for resection. Well- or intermediately differentiated tumors ≥2 cm with imaging evidence of malignancy or with a Ki-67 >2% should be resected. It has been suggested that non-MEN related, nonfunctioning, and asymptomatic PNETs <2 cm with a Ki-67 index ≤2% carry a low risk of metastasis and may be observed in the absence of clinical or radiologic criteria of malignancy or progression, especially in older patients. However, because metastases may occur with long delay with smaller PNETS, physicians should consider patient age, lesion location, and the risks of operation, and patients not undergoing surgery need to be closely followed closely.

Single-centre experience of extending indications for percutaneous intraportal islet autotransplantation (PIPIAT) after pancreatic surgery to prevent diabetes: feasibility, radiological aspects, complications and clinical outcome

OBJECTIVE

Islet allotransplantation is a less invasive alternative to surgical pancreas transplantation for Type 1 diabetes, while percutaneous intraportal islet autotransplantation (PIPIAT) is usually performed after pancreatic surgery to prevent diabetes. Our aim was to assess the feasibility, radiological aspects, complications and clinical outcome of PIPIAT following pancreatic surgery for not only chronic pancreatitis but also benign and malignant nodules.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2012, 41 patients were enrolled for PIPIAT 12-48 h after pancreatic surgery (extended pancreatic surgery for chronic pancreatitis and benign/malignant neoplasms). PIPIAT was performed using a combined ultrasonography and fluoroscopy-guided technique (4-F catheter). PIPIAT feasibility, median follow-up and metabolic (insulin independence rate, graft function based on C-peptide levels) and oncologic outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

PIPIAT was not performed in 7/41 patients (4 cases for an inadequate islet mass, 2 cases for haemodynamic instability and 1 case for islet culture contamination), while it was successfully performed in 34/34 patients. Procedure-related major complications occurred in four patients: two bleedings requiring transfusions, one patient with left portal vein thrombosis and one patient with sepsis. Median follow-up duration was 546 days. Insulin independence was achieved in 15/34 (44%) patients, partial graft function in 16/34 (47%) patients and no function in 3/34 (9%) patients. None of the 17 patients with malignant nodules developed liver metastases during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

PIPIAT, performed under ultrasound and fluoroscopy combined guidance and not requiring immunosuppression, is feasible, with a relatively low complication rate and a better metabolic outcome than allotransplantation.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

PIPIAT can prevent pancreatogenic diabetes. Ultrasound is a useful tool for the guidance and monitoring of PIPIAT.

[Surgical treatment of benign, premalignant and low-risk tumors of the pancreas : Standard resection or parenchyma preserving, local extirpation]

Cystic neoplasms and neuroendocrine adenomas of the pancreas are detected increasingly more frequently and in up to 50 % as asymptomatic tumors. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, mucinous cystic neoplasms and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms are considered to be premalignant lesions with different rates of malignant transformation. The most frequent neuroendocrine adenomas are insulinomas. Neuroendocrine adenomas are considered to be potentially malignant, inherent to the lesion and development is unpredictable. Standard surgical treatment for pancreatic tumors are the Kausch-Whipple resection, left hemipancreatectomy and total pancreatectomy depending on the location; however, the application of standard surgical procedures, which are usually multiorgan resections for benign, premalignant and low-risk cancers of the pancreas have to be balanced against the risk for early postoperative morbidity, hospital mortality of 1.5-7 % and loss of endocrine and exocrine pancreatic functions in 12-30 %. Tumor enucleation, pancreatic middle segment resection and duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head (DPPHR-T/S) resection are parenchyma-preserving, local resection procedures, which are associated with a low early postoperative rate of severe complications, hospital mortality up to 1.3 % and maintenance of exocrine and endocrine pancreatic functions in more than 90 %. Tumor enucleation bears the risk of pancreatic fistulas (<33 %) and a limitation is proximity to the pancreatic main duct. The main risk for pancreatic middle segment resection is early postoperative pancreatic fistulas (up to 40 %), early postoperative intra-abdominal hemorrhage and a reintervention frequency up to 15 %. The DPPHR-T/S resection is applied for cystic neoplastic lesions in 90 %, severe postoperative complications are below 15 % and the 90-day hospital mortality is 0.5 %. Pancreatic fistulas are observed in less than 20 % with a recurrence rate of <1 %. These facts and maintenance of exocrine and endocrine pancreatic functions are advantages compared with the Kausch-Whipple resection of the pancreatic head. The use of tumor enucleation, particularly for neuroendocrine tumors and pancreatic middle segment resection as well as total DPPHR resection should replace the pancreatoduodenectomy for lesions in the pancreatic head and hemipancreatectomy for lesions in the pancreatic body and tail.

Molecular Analyses of Aspirated Cystic Fluid for the Differential Diagnosis of Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background. Researchers have evaluated various molecular tests for improving the differential diagnosis of cystic lesions of the pancreas. Methods. Six electronic databases were searched for articles on molecular tests for the diagnosis of pancreatic cysts. Measures of accuracy were extracted from selected articles and pooled by the random-effects model. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were used to analyze the overall accuracy of the molecular tests. Pooled sensitivity and specificity values [95% confidence intervals] are reported. Results. The systematic review included eight studies of 428 patients in total. We determined the sensitivities and specificities of tests for KRAS mutations (0.47 [0.39-0.54], 0.98 [0.93-0.99]) and loss of heterozygosity (0.63 [0.54-0.71], 0.76 [0.63-0.87]) for distinguishing mucinous from nonmucinous cysts, as well as the sensitivities and specificities of tests for KRAS mutations (0.59 [0.46-0.71], 0.78 [0.71-0.85]) and loss of heterozygosity (0.89 [0.78-0.96], 0.69 [0.60-0.76]) for differentiating malignant from benign cysts. Conclusion. Tests of KRAS mutations could confirm but not exclude a diagnosis of a mucinous or malignant pancreatic cyst.

Morbidity and mortality of pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and premalignant pancreatic neoplasms

OBJECTIVES

Patients with benign neoplasms of the pancreas are selected for pancreaticoduodenectomy if there is concern for malignant transformation. This study compares outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with premalignant and malignant pancreatic neoplasms.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for histologically confirmed benign/premalignant pancreatic neoplasms and primary pancreatic malignancy reported to National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) from 2005 to 2011. Patient characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative morbidity and mortality were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 6085 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy: 744 (12.2 %) for benign/premalignant and 5341 (87.8 %) for malignant pancreatic neoplasms. Patients with benign/premalignant neoplasms were more commonly female, had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and were less likely to have major comorbidities (all p ≤ 0.003). After resection, patients with benign/premalignant neoplasms were more likely to develop organ space infection (13.4 vs. 8.5 %, p < 0.001) and sepsis (12.2 vs. 9.2 %, p = 0.009). Cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, and other organ system complications (p = 0.12) as well as 30-day mortality (3.0 vs. 2.0 %, p = 0.128) did not differ.

CONCLUSIONS

Organ space infection and sepsis are more common after pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign/premalignant neoplasms. Planned improvements in NSQIP data capture should allow for better measurement of this morbidity. A carefully balanced risk and benefit discussion should precede resection in these patients.

Diabetes after pancreatic surgery: novel issues

In the developed world, pancreatic surgery is becoming more common, with an increasing number of patients developing diabetes because of either partial or total pancreatectomy, with a significant impact on quality of life and survival. Although these patients are expected to consume increasing health care resources in the near future, many aspects of diabetes after pancreatectomy are still not well defined. The treatment of diabetes in these patients takes advantage of the therapies used in type 1 and 2 diabetes; however, no specific guidelines for its management, both immediately after pancreatic surgery or in the long term, have been developed. In this article, on the basis of both the literature and our clinical experience, we address the open issues and discuss the most appropriate therapeutic options for patients with diabetes after pancreatectomy.

Improving patient notification of solid abdominal viscera incidental findings with a standardized protocol

Background

The increasing use of computed tomography (CT) scans in the evaluation of trauma patients has led to increased detection of incidental radiologic findings. Incidental findings (IFs) of the abdominal viscera are among the most commonly discovered lesions and can carry a risk of malignancy. Despite this, patient notification regarding these findings is often inadequate.

Methods

We identified patients who underwent abdominopelvic CTs as part of their trauma evaluation during a recent 1-year period (9/2011-8/2012). Patients with IFs of the kidneys, liver, adrenal glands, pancreas and/or ovaries had their charts reviewed for documentation of the lesion in their discharge paperwork or follow-up. A quality improvement project was initiated where patients with abdominal IFs were verbally informed of the finding, it was noted on their discharge summary and/or were referred to specialists for evaluation. Nine months after the implementation of the IF protocol, a second chart review was performed to determine if the rate of patient notification improved.

Results

Of 1,117 trauma patients undergoing abdominopelvic CT scans during the 21 month study period, 239 patients (21.4%) had 292 incidental abdominal findings. Renal lesions were the most common (146 patients, 13% of all patients) followed by hepatic (95/8.4%) and adrenal (38/3.4%) lesions. Pancreatic (10/0.9%) and ovarian lesions (3/0.3%) were uncommon. Post-IF protocol implementation patient notification regarding IFs improved by over 80% (32.4% vs. 17.7% pre-protocol, p = 0.02).

Conclusion

IFs of the solid abdominal organs are common in trauma patients undergoing abdominopelvic CT scan. Patient notification regarding these lesions is often inadequate. A systematic approach to the documentation and evaluation of incidental radiologic findings can significantly improve the rate of patient notification.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13032-014-0022-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Screening for pancreatic cancer

Even with improved cancer care generally, the incidence and death rate is increasing for pancreatic cancer. Concern exists that a further increase in deaths caused by pancreatic cancer will be seen as other causes of death, such as heart disease and other cancers, decline. Critical exploration of screening high-risk patients as a tool to reduce deaths from pancreatic cancer should be considered. Technological advances and improved understanding of pancreatic cancer biology provides an opportunity to identify and test a panel of early detection biomarkers easily, accurately, and inexpensively measured in blood, urine, stool, or saliva samples. These biomarkers may have additional usefulness in staging, stratification for treatment, establishing prognosis, and assessing response to therapy in this disease. Screening may prove to be one of several strategies to improve outcomes in a disease that has otherwise been difficult to defeat.

Clinical signature and pathogenetic factors of diabetes associated with pancreas disease (T3cDM): a prospective observational study in surgical patients

To characterize the clinical signature and etiopathogenetic factors of diabetes associated with pancreas disease [type 3 diabetes mellitus (T3cDM)]. To estimate incidence and identify predictors of both diabetes onset and remission after pancreatic surgery. A prospective observational study was conducted. From January 2008 to December 2012, patients (n = 651) with new diagnosis of pancreatic disease admitted to the Pancreatic Surgery Unit of the San Raffaele Scientific Institute were evaluated. Hospital and/or outpatient medical records were reviewed. Blood biochemical values including fasting blood glucose, insulin and/or C-peptide, glycosylated hemoglobin and anti-islet antibodies were determined. Diabetes onset was assessed after surgery and during follow-up. At baseline, the prevalence of diabetes was 38 % (age of onset 64 ± 11 years). In most cases, diabetes occurred within 48 months from pancreatic disease diagnosis. Among different pancreatic diseases, minor differences were observed in diabetes characteristics, with the exception of the prevalence. Diabetes appeared associated with classical risk factors for type 2 diabetes (i.e., age, sex, family history of diabetes and body mass index), and both beta-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance appeared relevant determinants. The prevalence of adult-onset autoimmune diabetes was as previously reported within type 2 diabetes. Within a few days after surgery, either diabetes remission or new-onset diabetes was observed. In patients with pancreatic cancer, no difference in diabetes remission was observed after palliative or resective surgery. Classical risk factors for type 2 diabetes were associated with the onset of diabetes after surgery. T3cDM appeared as a heterogeneous entity strongly overlapped with type 2 diabetes.

Autologous islet transplantation in patients requiring pancreatectomy for neoplasm

Autologous islet cell transplantation is a procedure performed to prevent or reduce the severity of diabetes after pancreatic resection. Autologous islet cell transplantation is being used almost exclusively in patients undergoing pancreatectomy because of painful, chronic pancreatitis, or multiple recurrent episodes of pancreatitis that is not controlled by standard medical and surgical treatments. Here, we discuss the possibility of extending the clinical indications for this treatment on the basis of our experience in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery for both nonmalignant and malignant diseases, including patients undergoing completion pancreatectomy because of anastomosis leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy and those with pancreatic anastomosis deemed at high risk for failure.

Nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are a group of rare, heterogeneous neoplasms that have been increasing in incidence the past few decades largely because of the diagnosis of pancreatic incidentalomas on cross-sectional imaging. Although these tumors are classically associated with clinical syndromes that result from excess secretion of particular hormones, most pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are nonfunctional tumors presenting with symptoms secondary to mass effect, metastatic disease, or as incidental findings. This article reviews the diagnostic algorithm, surgical management, and available systemic therapies for nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: clinicopathologic and survival analyses of 64 cases from a single institution

Although solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) are considered tumors of low malignant potential, patients may present with aggressive disease (ie, liver metastasis/invasion into adjacent organs) and, rarely, die from disease. Although the clinicopathologic features associated with aggressive SPNs have been reported, important prognostic factors of survival remain unclear. We systematically reviewed 64 cases of SPN resected at our institution for tumor size, extent of invasion, margin status, presence of lymphovascular, muscular vessel, and perineural invasion, and lymph node and distant metastases. Clinicopathologic characteristics were correlated with the presence of metastasis/recurrence and disease-specific survival. Five (8%) patients presented with stage IV disease. During follow-up, 5 (13%) of 39 patients with stage I-II disease had recurrences. Patients with metastatic/recurrent SPNs had significantly larger tumor size (P<0.001) and more frequent tumor invasion into muscular vessels (P=0.02). In a median follow-up of 76 months, only 2 died of disease (1 who presented with extensive peritoneal tumor involvement who died 2.5 mo after surgery, and 1 unusual case who presented with multiple liver metastasis and peritoneal seeding who died 19 mo after surgery), and 5 were alive with disease. The 10-year disease-specific survival rate was 96%. Muscular vessel invasion (P=0.001), tumor (T) stage by European Neuroendocrine Tumors Society (ENETS) classification (P<0.001), ENETS stage grouping (P<0.001), and stage grouping by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC stage, P<0.001) were important predictors of disease-specific survival in patients with SPN. Our study highlights the importance of pathologic evaluation in risk assessment in patients with SPNs.

Sporadic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: prognostic significance of incidental diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Sporadic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs) are increasingly diagnosed as incidentalomas, and their resection is usually recommended. The prognostic significance of this diagnosis feature is poorly studied, and management of these tumors remains controversial. Clinical, pathologic characteristics and outcome of resected incidentally diagnosed NF-PNET (Inc) were compared with resected symptomatic NF-PNET (Symp) to better assess their biologic behavior and tailor their management.

METHODS

From 1994 to 2010, 108 patients underwent resection for sporadic nonmetastatic NF-PNET. Diagnosis was considered as incidental in patients with no abdominal symptoms or symptoms unlikely to be related to tumor mass. Patients with Inc were compared with patients with Symp, regarding demographics, postoperative course, pathology, and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Of the 108 patients, 65 (61%) had incidentally diagnosed tumors. Pancreas-sparing pancreatectomies (enucleation/central pancreatectomy) were performed more frequently in Inc (62% vs 30%, P = .001). Inc tumors were more frequently <20 mm (65% vs 42%, P = .019), staged T1 (62% vs 33%, P = .0001), node negative (85% vs 60%; P = .005), and grade 1 (66% vs 33%, P = .0001). One postoperative death occurred in the Inc group, and postoperative morbidity was similar between the two groups (60% vs 65%, P = .59). DFS was substantially better in the Inc group (5-year DFS = 92% vs 82%, P = .0016).

CONCLUSION

Incidentally diagnosed NF-PNETs are associated with less aggressive features compared with symptomatic lesions but cannot always be considered to be benign. Operative resection remains recommended for most. Incidentally diagnosed NF-PNET may be good candidates for pancreas-sparing pancreatectomies.

Incidental findings on MRI of the temporomandibular joint

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of incidental findings in MRI of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ).

METHODS

MRI reports of 730 patients were assessed. The reports were analysed by one consultant and one clinical lecturer in dental and maxillofacial radiology. The prevalence of intracranial and extracranial incidental findings was recorded and categorized.

RESULTS

There were 53 (7.3%) incidental findings, of which 11 (1.5%) were intracranial and 42 (5.7%) were extracranial (divided into paranasal sinuses, mastoid air cells, muscle hypertrophy, lymphadenopathy and salivary glands). A total number of eight intracranial findings needed further dedicated imaging and/or specialist clinical opinion. Only one tumour (a meningioma) was found and required surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidental findings on TMJ MRI are rare but not unheard of. The clinical relevance of incidental findings can be significant, and it is therefore important to ensure that the full data set of images is inspected, including any scout slices. A close working relationship between the areas of dental and maxillofacial radiology and neuroradiology is essential in expediting a second opinion relating to intracranial findings. All incidental findings should be communicated to referring clinicians in a timely manner, based on their urgency and clinical significance.

PET/CT of cancer patients: part 1, pancreatic neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic cancer continues to have a poor prognosis despite impressive improvements in the outcomes of many other types of cancer, often because most pancreatic neoplasms are found to be unresectable at diagnosis. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of pancreatic cancer and the role of modern imaging in its diagnosis and management with an emphasis on (18)F-FDG PET/CT fusion imaging.

CONCLUSION

Multimodality imaging is critical in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer. PET/CT is increasingly viewed as a useful, accurate, and cost-effective modality in diagnosing and managing pancreatic cancer, but further studies are warranted. Early data suggest that contrast-enhanced PET/CT performed with modern PET/CT scanners yields high-resolution anatomic information for surgical and radiotherapeutic planning and functional information for whole-body staging in the care of patients with this disease.

Place of surgical resection in the treatment strategy of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are usually slow-growing neoplasms carrying an overall favorable prognosis. Surgery, from resection to transplantation, remains the only potential curative option for these patients, and should always be considered. Nevertheless, because of very few randomized controlled trials available, the optimal treatment for these patients remains controversial, especially regarding the place of surgery. We herein discuss the place of surgical resection in the treatment strategy in neuroendocrine tumors of the digestive tract.

Incidentally discovered solid pancreatic masses: imaging and clinical observations

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to review the CT findings and clinical outcome in patients with incidentally discovered solid pancreatic masses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over an 8-year period, from 2001 to 2009, we identified 24 patients with solid pancreatic masses incidentally detected by CT. There were 13 females and 11 males, with a mean age of 67 years. We determined the indication for initial CT, analyzed the CT features, and ascertained the clinical follow-up in all the patients.

RESULTS

All of the solid masses were malignant. There were 14 adenocarcinomas and 10 neuroendocrine tumors. The most common indications for the initial CT were surveillance of an extrapancreatic malignancy (n = 10) and evaluation for hematuria (n = 6). On the initial CT, 16 of the patients (67%) had a clearly visible pancreatic mass. In eight patients isoattenuating masses were identified, only recognized by subtle signs including unexplained dilatation of the pancreatic duct (n = 5) or minimal contour deformity or density of the pancreas (n = 3). The mean survival time for the patients with adenocarcinoma was 21.6 months, and 42 months for the patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

CONCLUSION

Although uncommon, incidentally discovered solid pancreatic masses are malignant neoplasms, either ductal adenocarcinomas or neuroendocrine tumors. Unlike incidentally discovered small cystic lesions, solid pancreatic lesions are often biologically aggressive.

Small and potentially resectable focal pancreatic lesions noted on CT/MRI scans in nonjaundiced patients: likelihood of neoplasia and utility of EUS

BACKGROUND

Management of small and potentially resectable "mass" lesions encountered on CT/MRI scans in patients without obstructive jaundice (ObJ) is rather empirical since there is scant data on likelihood of neoplasm to formulate treatment strategies. We evaluated (1) the prevalence of neoplasm and (2) performance characteristics of EUS-FNA for diagnosing neoplasm in above-mentioned subset of patients.

PATIENTS

This is a retrospective analysis of 232 patients (without ObJ) with a focal pancreatic lesion, ≤ 25 mm and potentially resectable on CT/MRI who underwent EUS-FNA from 2002 to 2009.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients (32.3%, 95% CI 26.6, 38.6) were finally diagnosed to have a neoplasm. Four of 92 (4.3%) lesions ≤ 15 mm, 13 of 57(22.8%) lesions 16-20 mm, and 35 of 83 (42.1%) lesions 21-25 mm had an adenocarcinoma. Larger lesion size, older patient age, and h/o recent weight loss significantly increased the likelihood of adenocarcinoma. EUS-FNA had 98.2% overall accuracy and 98.1% NPV with no significant differences based on lesion size.

CONCLUSIONS

In nonjaundiced patient with a potentially resectable pancreatic lesion ≤25 mm in size noted on CT/MRI scanning, EUS-FNA can provide useful adjunctive information to optimize the use of surgery and can potentially obviate the need for "wait and watch approach" with repeat imaging in their clinical management.

Pancreatic incidentalomas

Pancreatic incidentalomas are defined as asymptomatic pancreatic lesions, discovered incidentally by imaging for an unrelated indication. They are being discovered with increasing frequency as the use of high quality cross sectional imaging is becoming more widespread. These lesions cover a wide spectrum of pathology from benign simple cysts through potentially malignant lesions such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia, to frankly malignant adenocarcinoma. In this article we outline the incidence, imaging characteristics and natural history of the various incidental lesions with emphasis to neuroendocrine tumors. A diagnostic approach is also suggested, including the rational use of further imaging, serum biochemistry and the utility of ultrasound guided aspiration of cyst fluid if present. We examine several proposed classification systems and discuss the role of surgery, surveillance and prognosis.