1
|
Ott BR, Hollins C, Tjia J, Baek J, Chen Q, Lapane KL, Alcusky M. Antidementia Medication Use in Nursing Home Residents. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2024; 37:194-205. [PMID: 37715795 PMCID: PMC10947315 DOI: 10.1177/08919887231202948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antidementia medication can provide symptomatic improvements in patients with Alzheimer's disease, but there is a lack of consensus guidance on when to start and stop treatment in the nursing home setting. METHODS We describe utilization patterns of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) and memantine for 3,50,197 newly admitted NH residents with dementia between 2011 and 2018. RESULTS Overall, pre-admission use of antidementia medications declined from 2011 to 2018 (ChEIs: 44.5% to 36.9%; memantine: 27.4% to 23.2%). Older age, use of a feeding tube, and greater functional dependency were associated with lower odds of ChEI initiation. Coronary artery disease, parenteral nutrition, severe aggressive behaviors, severe cognitive impairment, and high functional dependency were associated with discontinuation of ChEIs. Comparison of clinical factors related to anti-dementia drug treatment changes from pre to post NH admission in 2011 and 2018 revealed a change toward lower likelihood of initiation of treatment among residents with more functional dependency and those with indicators of more complex illness as well as a change toward higher likelihood of discontinuation in residents having 2 or more hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS These prescribing trends highlight the need for additional research on the effects of initiating and discontinuing antidementia medications in the NH to provide clear guidance for clinicians when making treatment decisions for individual residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian R. Ott
- Department of Neurology, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, RI
| | - Carl Hollins
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Jennifer Tjia
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Jonggyu Baek
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Qiaoxi Chen
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Kate L. Lapane
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Matthew Alcusky
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Herrmann N, Ismail Z, Collins R, Desmarais P, Goodarzi Z, Henri‐Bhargava A, Iaboni A, Kirkham J, Massoud F, Moser A, Silvius J, Watt J, Seitz D. CCCDTD5 recommendations on the deprescribing of cognitive enhancers in dementia. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (NEW YORK, N. Y.) 2022; 8:e12099. [PMID: 35128025 PMCID: PMC8802736 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cognitive enhancers (ie, cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine) can provide symptomatic benefit for some individuals with dementia; however, there are circumstances in which the risks of continuing treatment may potentially outweigh benefits. The decision to deprescribe cognitive enhancers must consider each patient's preferences, treatment indications, current clinical status and symptoms, prognosis, and dementia type. METHODS The 5th Canadian Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia (CCCDTD5) established a subcommittee of experts to review current evidence on the deprescribing of cognitive enhancers. The questions answered by this group included: When should cognitive enhancers be deprescribed in persons with dementia and mild cognitive impairment? How should cognitive enhancers be deprescribed? And, what clinical factors should be considered when deprescribing cognitive enhancers? RESULTS Patient and care-partner preferences should be incorporated into all decisions to deprescribe cognitive enhancers. Cognitive enhancers should be discontinued in individuals without ongoing evidence of benefit or when the indication for cognitive enhancer use was inappropriate (eg, mild cognitive impairment). Deprescribing should occur gradually and cognitive enhancers should be reinitiated if patients' cognition or function deteriorates. Cognitive enhancers should be continued in individuals whose neuropsychiatric symptoms improve in response to treatment. Clinicians should not deprescribe cognitive enhancers in individuals with significant neuropsychiatric symptoms until symptoms have stabilized. CONCLUSION CCCDTD5 deprescribing recommendations provide evidence-informed recommendations related to cognitive enhancer deprescribing that will facilitate shared decision making among patients, care partners, and clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Herrmann
- Department of PsychiatrySunnybrook Health Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Zahinoor Ismail
- Departments of Psychiatry, Clinical Neurosciences, and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine; Hotchkiss Brain Institute and O'Brien Institute of Public HealthUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Rhonda Collins
- Department of Family MedicineMcMaster UniversityChief Medical Officer, Revera IncHamiltonOntarioCanada
| | - Philippe Desmarais
- Department of MedicineDivision of Geriatrics and Department of NeurosciencesCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de MontréalMontréalQuébecCanada
| | - Zahra Goodarzi
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine; Hotchkiss Brain Institute; O'Brien Institute of Public HealthUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
| | - Alexandre Henri‐Bhargava
- Division of Neurology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of British Columbia; Division of Medical Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrea Iaboni
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- Kite Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity Health NetworkTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Julia Kirkham
- Department of PsychiatryCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary
| | - Fadi Massoud
- Department of MedicineUniversity of SherbrookeSherbrookeQuebecCanada
| | - Andrea Moser
- Department of Family and Community MedicineUniversity of Toronto, Associate Medical Director, Jewish Home for the Aged, BaycrestTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - James Silvius
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jennifer Watt
- Division of Geriatric MedicineDepartment of Medicine, University of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Dallas Seitz
- Departments of Psychiatry, Clinical Neurosciences, and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine; Hotchkiss Brain Institute and O'Brien Institute of Public HealthUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wong D, Broberg DN, Doad J, Umoh JU, Bellyou M, Norley CJD, Holdsworth DW, Montero-Odasso M, Beauchet O, Annweiler C, Bartha R. Effect of Memantine Treatment and Combination with Vitamin D Supplementation on Body Composition in the APP/PS1 Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease Following Chronic Vitamin D Deficiency. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 81:375-388. [PMID: 33780366 DOI: 10.3233/jad-201137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vitamin D deficiency and altered body composition are common in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Memantine with vitamin D supplementation can protect cortical axons against amyloid-β exposure and glutamate toxicity. OBJECTIVE To study the effects of vitamin D deprivation and subsequent treatment with memantine and vitamin D enrichment on whole-body composition using a mouse model of AD. METHODS Male APPswe/PS1dE9 mice were divided into four groups at 2.5 months of age: the control group (n = 14) was fed a standard diet throughout; the remaining mice were started on a vitamin D-deficient diet at month 6. The vitamin D-deficient group (n = 14) remained on the vitamin D-deficient diet for the rest of the study. Of the remaining two groups, one had memantine (n = 14), while the other had both memantine and 10 IU/g vitamin D (n = 14), added to their diet at month 9. Serum 25(OH)D levels measured at months 6, 9, 12, and 15 confirmed vitamin D levels were lower in mice on vitamin D-deficient diets and higher in the vitamin D-supplemented mice. Micro-computed tomography was performed at month 15 to determine whole-body composition. RESULTS In mice deprived of vitamin D, memantine increased bone mineral content (8.7% increase, p < 0.01) and absolute skeletal tissue mass (9.3% increase, p < 0.05) and volume (9.2% increase, p < 0.05) relative to controls. This was not observed when memantine treatment was combined with vitamin D enrichment. CONCLUSION Combination treatment of vitamin D and memantine had no negative effects on body composition. Future studies should clarify whether vitamin D status impacts the effects of memantine treatment on bone physiology in people with AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dickson Wong
- Centre for Functional and Metabolic Mapping, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Dana N Broberg
- Centre for Functional and Metabolic Mapping, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jagroop Doad
- Centre for Functional and Metabolic Mapping, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Joseph U Umoh
- Preclinical Imaging Research Centre, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Miranda Bellyou
- Centre for Functional and Metabolic Mapping, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Chris J D Norley
- Preclinical Imaging Research Centre, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - David W Holdsworth
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.,Preclinical Imaging Research Centre, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Manuel Montero-Odasso
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Parkwood Hospital, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.,Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Olivier Beauchet
- Department of Medicine, University of Montreal and McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Cedric Annweiler
- Department of Geriatric Medicine and Memory Clinic, Research Center on Autonomy and Longevity, University Hospital, Angers, France.,UPRES EA 4638, University of Angers, Angers, France
| | - Robert Bartha
- Centre for Functional and Metabolic Mapping, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Saint-Paul LP, Martin J, Gaillard C, Garnier A, Mosquet B, Guillamo JS, Parienti JJ. [Not Available]. Therapie 2016; 70:313-9. [PMID: 27393634 DOI: 10.2515/therapie/2014217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2014] [Accepted: 10/10/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The modalities for anti-dementia drugs' discontinuation are not consensual. OBJECTIVE The objectives of the study were the followings, describe: i) the reasons for discontinuation of anti-dementia drugs of patients treated in a residency for dependent elderly people, ii) security of sudden discontinuation, iii) evolution of troubles. METHODS Our longitudinal descriptive pilot study aimed at observing consequences of the sudden discontinuation of anti-dementia drugs in a population with a moderate to severe stage of Alzheimer's disease. The study took place in a French residency for dependent elderly people, treated with at least one of the following treatments: rivastigmine, donepezil, galantamine and/or memantine. Based on multidisciplinary decision, as recommended, patient's anti-dementia treatment have been stopped or not. Criteria have been collected for 6months and compared between the two groups: safety, motivation for discontinuation, score mini-mental state examination (MMSE), psycho-behavior criteria and finally the concomitant prescription of psychotropic drugs. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were included: the revaluation of anti-dementia treatment led to 22 discontinuations and 11 continuations. Motivations to stop antidementia treatment were: too advanced dementia (48%), lack of therapeutic benefit (28%) or too much of psychotropic medications (24%). The sudden discontinuation was well tolerated with no withdrawal syndrome observed. The variation of MMSE at 6months was -1.8 (SD 2.2) in the discontinuation group (n=14) versus -2.2 (SD 2.0) in the continuation group (n=6). The psycho-behavior disorders have not been aggravated. A reduction in number of psychotropic drugs in the discontinuation group was observed. CONCLUSION In this pilot study, the revaluation in accordance with the recommendations of the Haute autorité de santé (HAS) led to the discontinuation of two third of anti-dementia drugs. Safety of sudden discontinuation of MSD remains to be studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laure Peyro Saint-Paul
- Pôle de Recherche et d'Épidémiologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France.
| | - Jocelyne Martin
- EHPAD et SSR Gériatrique, Hôpital de Carentan, Carentan, France
| | - Cathy Gaillard
- Pôle de Recherche et d'Épidémiologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France
| | - Aline Garnier
- Pôle de Recherche et d'Épidémiologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France
| | - Brigitte Mosquet
- Service de Pharmacologie, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France
| | | | - Jean-Jacques Parienti
- Pôle de Recherche et d'Épidémiologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
|
6
|
Morley JE. New Horizons in the Management of Alzheimer Disease. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015; 16:1-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2014] [Accepted: 10/29/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
7
|
Rodríguez D, Formiga F, Fort I, Robles MJ, Barranco E, Cubí D. [Pharmacological treatment of dementia: when, how and for how long. Recommendations of the Working Group on Dementia of the Catalan Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology]. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 2012; 47:228-233. [PMID: 22633250 DOI: 10.1016/j.regg.2012.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2011] [Revised: 01/16/2012] [Accepted: 02/23/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Dementia in general--and Alzheimer's disease (AD) in particular--are bound to loom large among the most acute healthcare, social, and public health problems of the 21st century. AD shows a degenerative progression that can be slowed down--yet not halted--by today's most widely accepted specific treatments (those based on cholinesterase inhibitors as well as those using memantine). There is enough evidence to consider these treatments advisable for the mild, moderate and severe phases of the illness. However, in the final stage of the disease, a decision has to be made on whether to withdraw such treatment or not. In this paper, the Working Group on Dementia for the Catalan Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology reviews the use of these specific pharmacological treatments for AD, and, drawing on the scientific evidence thus gathered, makes a series of recommendations on when, how, and for how long, the currently existing specific pharmacological treatments should be used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Rodríguez
- Equipo de Evaluación Integral Ambulatoria de Trastornos Cognitivos y de la Conducta, Servicio de Geriatría, Hospital St. Llàtzer, Consorcio Sanitario de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tjia J, Givens J. Ethical framework for medication discontinuation in nursing home residents with limited life expectancy. Clin Geriatr Med 2012; 28:255-72. [PMID: 22500542 DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2012.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
A recent editorial by health economist Victor Fuchs summarized the current challenges with health care delivery in this way: “Most physicians want to deliver ‘appropriate’ care. Most want to practice ‘ethically’, but it is difficult to know what is ‘appropriate’ and what is ‘ethical’. This characterization is particularly true for medication use and deprescribing in elderly NH residents with limited life expectancy. Medical ethics sets 4 key principles (beneficence, nonmaleficence, patient autonomy, and justice) to guide practice. However, decisional conflicts will continue between providers and patients, and physicians will continue to struggle with the dilemma of balancing the primacy of patient welfare, values, and beliefs against the desire for promising, but often minimally beneficial and harmful, medications that threaten limited clinical resources. Despite these challenges, physicians should be able to perform systematic medication reviews and monitor discontinuation trials in their NH patients for whom this is consistent with their goals of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Tjia
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Toward Better Terminology of Behavioral Symptoms of Dementia. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2012; 13:3-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2010] [Accepted: 12/07/2010] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
10
|
Burke AD, Yaari R, Fleisher AS, Brand H, Dougherty J, Seward JD, Tariot PN. Mild cognitive impairment: diagnosis and treatment dilemmas. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2011; 13:11alz01241. [PMID: 22132355 DOI: 10.4088/pcc.11alz01241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2011] [Accepted: 06/21/2011] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anna D Burke
- Banner Alzheimer's Institute, 901 E. Willetta St, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Oustric S, Rouge-Bugat ME, Vellas B. Primary Care Practitioners on the Front Line of Alzheimer's Disease Care. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2011; 12:545-546.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2011] [Accepted: 06/28/2011] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
12
|
|
13
|
A Research Agenda for Nursing Homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2011; 12:393-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2011] [Accepted: 04/05/2011] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|