An evaluation of community pharmacies' actions under value-based payment

Pharmacy-Led Management of Atrial Fibrillation: Improving Treatment Adherence and Patient Outcomes

The world's population is ageing, with the number of those over 60 years expected to represent a fifth of the total population by 2050. Increases in chronic long-term health conditions (LTCs) associated with ageing, and requiring regular but often avoidable medical intervention, are pressurising already overloaded, health and social care systems. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an LTC, which is most frequently diagnosed in the elderly. An often, asymptomatic condition, AF is associated with a 3- to 5-fold increased risk of severe ischemic stroke. Stroke prevention, with risk-stratified oral anticoagulants (OACs) is the standard recommended care for patients with AF. Stroke avoidance is, however, dependent on persistent adherence to OAC medication, with an adherence rate of >80% considered necessary to achieve optimal health outcomes. Suboptimal adherence to OACs is common, with a third of all AF patients not taking their medication as prescribed. This combined with the short half-life of OACs can result in poor clinical outcomes for patients. Policy makers now consider improving adherence to prescribed medicines for LTCs, a public health priority, to ensure better health outcomes for patients, whilst minimising unnecessary health system costs. Prescribing medicines to treat LTCs, such as AF, is not enough, particularly when the patient may not experience any measurable benefit to the treatment and may instead, experience medication-associated adverse events, including a risk of bleeding. Pharmacists who are experts in medicines management are ideally placed to support medication adherence, to educate, and to improve health outcomes for patients with AF. In this review, I will consider the evidence for poor medication adherence in LTCs and in particular adherence to OACs in patients with AF and highlight the role that pharmacists can play in ensuring optimal adherence and showcase pharmacist-led interventions that effectively address this problem.

Flip the Pharmacy's impact on comprehensive medication management performance

BACKGROUND

Clinically integrated networks of community pharmacies are expanding partnerships with health care payers for sustainable provision of patient care services. The Pennsylvania Pharmacists Care Network (PPCN), a part of CPESN USA, launched its first payer program in 2017 with a Medicaid managed care organization for comprehensive medication management (CMM). Some PPCN pharmacy teams have participated in Flip the Pharmacy, a national practice transformation initiative.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine whether pharmacy participation in Flip the Pharmacy was associated with a greater rate of CMM encounters than in nonparticipating pharmacies within a statewide clinically integrated network.

METHODS

This project was a retrospective quantitative study. CMM encounter data including total number of encounters and total number of eligible members were extracted from monthly reports. Generalized estimating equations were used to assess the association between Flip the Pharmacy participation and CMM encounter rates.

RESULTS

Of 103 pharmacies that participated in the CMM program in 2019 and 2020, 77.7% of pharmacies (n = 80) were included in analyses. Of these, 31.3% (n = 25) participated in Flip the Pharmacy. Overall, 80 pharmacies documented 8460 patient encounters through the CMM program. On average, pharmacies participating in Flip the Pharmacy recorded 1.67 times the rate of encounters compared with non-Flip the Pharmacy pharmacies (95% CI 1.10-2.54), controlling for single versus multiple pharmacy sites and weekend hours. On average, pharmacies participating in Flip the Pharmacy recorded 1.18 times the rate of initial encounters (95% CI 0.84-1.59) and 2.06 times the rate of follow-up encounters (95% CI 1.22-3.48) compared with non-Flip the Pharmacy pharmacies.

CONCLUSION

Participation in Flip the Pharmacy in Pennsylvania was associated with greater engagement and completion of encounters within a payer program for CMM. Continued practice transformation efforts are needed to ensure the sustainability of community pharmacy practice as it continues to expand into payment for patient care services.

Medication-Related Problems and Interventions Identified and Addressed by Pharmacists Conducting Enhanced Medication Therapy Management Services

Pharmacists identify, resolve, and document medication-related problems (MRPs) in community pharmacies. Enhanced medication therapy management (eMTM) targets specific situations, such as high-risk medications, while continuous medication monitoring (CoMM) occurs for every patient and is integrated into the dispensing process. This study describes types and frequencies of MRPs and interventions for health plan-directed eMTM and pharmacist-identified CoMM for a cohort of Medicare Part D patients. Pharmacy dispensing and clinical records from one independent community pharmacy in the Midwest were reviewed for patients eligible for eMTM in 2019. Data were coded for medication-related problems and interventions; descriptive statistics were calculated. Forty-seven patients were included in the study, resulting in 439 health plan-directed and 775 pharmacist-identified MRPs and corresponding interventions for a total of 1214 over 12 months. The average age of the patients was 77; they received an average of about 14 medications dispensed over 25 dates. Nonadherence was the most common MRP overall, as well as for the two categories separately. Patient Counseling and Lab Values Needed MRPs were found more often by pharmacists. Continue to Monitor was the most common intervention flagged overall. Medication Discontinued was found more often in health plan-directed interventions; Patient Counseling occurred more frequently in pharmacist-identified interventions. Using pharmacists to identify MRPs can complement health plan-driven eMTM, which can provide more complete medication management. Future work is needed to determine if this approach is reproducible in other pharmacies.

Evaluation of financial outcomes under a value-based payment program for community pharmacies

BACKGROUND: Value-based payment models have been shown to limit health care spending and waste while improving quality of care. Evidence from value-based pharmacy programs (VBPPs) is needed to guide the use of these mechanisms in health care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate financial outcomes of a VBPP implemented in 73 community pharmacies for about 40,000 commercial beneficiaries of Wellmark, Inc. METHODS: Beneficiaries were attributed to pharmacies based on the number of prescriptions dispensed. The VBPP paid community pharmacies a per capita payment based on their performance on a set of metrics to deliver care the pharmacists believed was necessary to optimize the beneficiaries' medication therapy and associated outcomes. Financial outcome variables were analyzed for the calendar year of 2018, including total cost of care, hospital admissions, and emergency department (ED) visits. Hospital admissions and ED visits were identified through claims data. Generalized linear models were used to test the effect of the VBPP on each of the outcome variables by comparing outcomes for beneficiaries attributed to the pharmacies participating in the VBPP (73 pharmacies) to Wellmark's beneficiaries attributed to nonparticipating pharmacies (847 pharmacies). Independent variables used in the models to control for possible confounding included beneficiary demographics and complexity scores, region code, accountable care organization (ACO) attribution, beneficiary product type (health maintenance organization (HMO), preferred provider organization (PPO), and several disease indicator variables. RESULTS: Analyses showed in 2018 that the per beneficiary per month total costs of care for the beneficiaries going to the VBPP pharmacies (N = 15,463) was $30.48 (4.5%; 95% CI = -6.2% to -2.7%) lower than that of the non-VBPP group (N = 140,717). The hospital admission rate for the VBPP group was 5.1% lower but was not statistically significant (95% CI = -12.9% to 3.3%). Similarly, the ED visit rate for the VBPP group was 2.1% lower than the non-VBPP group but did not reach statistical significance (95% CI = -8.6% to 3.3%). CONCLUSIONS: With the growing need for solutions to improve quality of care while reducing health care costs and waste, a value-based payment program using performance-determined capitated payments to community pharmacies offering enhanced clinical services significantly reduced total costs of care in a commercial population with one or more chronic conditions. Future work with this promising model is encouraged. DISCLOSURES: No external funding was obtained to support this study. Devolder and Heggen are employed by Wellmark, Inc. Doucette is supported by the Deborah K. Veale Professorship in Healthcare Policy at the University of Iowa. The authors have no other potential conflicts of interest to disclose.