The effects of the Bethesda System 2014 on endometrial cell reporting and follow-up endometrial biopsies in women 45 years of age and over

Long-term clinical significance of benign endometrial cells identified on routine cervical cytology in women aged more or equal to 45 years

INTRODUCTION

Within the Bethesda System, the recommendation of describing benign-appearing endometrial cells (BECs) has changed over recent years. Since the 2014 revision, their presence in cervical cytology reports has been deemed essential, beginning with age 45. Recent studies have suggested rising the reporting age to 50 years. Does the presence of these cells necessitate further assessment?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients aged between 45 and 65 years in whom BECs were present on cervical cytology between January 2001 and December 2010, with a follow-up at 5 and 10 years. Women who had abnormal cervical cells or atypical endometrial cells on cervical cytology were excluded, as well as women with a history of cervical or endometrial cancer, or a history of hysterectomy and incomplete follow-up data.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-six women were included. Of these, 31% were postmenopausal of which 65% used hormonal substitution therapy. Twenty-eight percent presented with abnormal uterine bleeding at inclusion. During the follow-up period of 10 years, 87.5% had a normal gynecological follow-up and 11.4% underwent a hysterectomy for benign pathology. One percent (2 patients) had been diagnosed with endometrial malignancy, both presenting with postmenopausal bleeding and aged over 60 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed that the presence of BECs is not a reason for concern when no additional clinical indicator is recognized, especially with normal ultrasonographic examination. Further invasive exploration may be controversial. If reporting BECs in cervical cytology continues, we strongly agree on rising the reporting age to 50 years or postmenopausal state.

Sensitivity of cervical cytology in endometrial cancer detection in a tertiary hospital in Spain

Introduction

Cervical cytology is a well‐stablished cervical cancer screening method. However, due to the anatomical continuity of the genital tract, it can also detect signs of endometrial disease. Our aim was to estimate the sensitivity of cervical cytology in endometrial cancer detection and prognosis in a large population over a 30‐year period in a large academic tertiary hospital in Spain.

Methodology

We performed a search for women diagnosed with endometrial cancer from 1990 to 2020, who were surgically treated and had a previous cervical cytology result. Information Technologies Department databases from Bellvitge University Hospital and the Screenwide case–control study's database were used. Cervical cytology results were classified as abnormal when squamous lesions, glandular atypia or malignant cells were identified.

Results

Overall, we evaluated 371 women with endometrial cancer and a documented cervical cytology performed within 3 years previous to surgical treatment. Overall, the sensitivity of cervical cytology for endometrial cancer detection was 25.6%. Several clinico‐pathological characteristics, such as non‐endometrioid histology and a higher stage, were correlated with higher sensitivity.

Discussion

We observed a low sensitivity of cervical cytology to effectively diagnose endometrial cancer. However, recent technological advances using genomics and epigenomics may offer a promising perspective to detect endometrial cancer with high sensitivity in these cervical specimens.

Negative Roche cobas HPV testing in cases of biopsy-proven invasive cervical carcinoma, compared with Hybrid Capture 2 and liquid-based cytology

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to conduct a retrospective analysis of results of cytology and Roche cobas (RC) and Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) human papillomavirus (HPV) screening tests in cases of biopsy-proven invasive cervical carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical data were obtained at a university hospital in New York, NY, between 2004 and 2017. Results of cytology, reported per Bethesda classification system, and HPV screening in 177 identified cases with cytology and biopsy-proven diagnosis of cervical carcinoma were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Two cohorts were analyzed. Of the 177 identified cases, cotesting was performed for 100 patients. Among these 100, cotesting screening results would not trigger immediate colposcopy in 6%; HPV screening results were reported as negative in 16% (16% of all RC, 16% of all HC2, 16% total) and, if HPV was the only screening modality, would not trigger a colposcopy. Of the 177 total cases, 128 patients underwent cytology screening prior to biopsy, with a cytology diagnosis that, alone, would not trigger immediate colposcopy in 14%.

CONCLUSIONS

The HPV DNA screening and cytology screening alone were negative for 16% and 14%, respectively, of patients with biopsy-proven diagnoses of invasive carcinoma of cervical origin, without a significant difference in failure rates between cytology, HC2, and RC. The cotesting approach had a significantly lower failure rate (6%) compared with the 2 other screening modalities alone.