1
|
Hortalà C, Selva C, Sola I, Selva A. Experience and satisfaction of participants in colorectal cancer screening programs: a qualitative evidence synthesis. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:2293. [PMID: 39180046 PMCID: PMC11342476 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19678-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Experience and satisfaction of colorectal cancer screening program participants are among the key factors that determine adherence to these programs. Understanding them is crucial to ensure future participation. OBJECTIVES To explore and gain understanding on the experience and satisfaction of the average-risk population participating in colorectal cancer screening programs. METHODS A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis. We conducted a literature search up to April 2023 in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis. We independently selected the studies for their inclusion, assessed their methodological quality (with CASP tool) and extracted data. Disagreements were solved by consensus. We thoroughly read the selected studies, and analyzed the data following a thematic synthesis approach. We evaluated the confidence in our findings with CERQUAL. RESULTS We included six studies: four had an appropriate quality, and two had some methodological limitations. We identified five main findings across studies: (1) Variability in the concerns about the results; (2) Challenges regarding procedure logistics; (3) Care received from the healthcare professionals; (4) Being adequately informed; (5) Expectations and experience with the program. All findings had a moderate level of confidence. CONCLUSIONS Our qualitative review provides a picture of the experience and satisfaction of the average-risk population participating in colorectal cancer screening programs. Despite some logistical and expectation management issues, the overall satisfaction with the programs is high. More research is needed on the topic, as there are still important gaps in knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Clara Selva
- Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Ivan Sola
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcleona, Catalonia, Spain
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Anna Selva
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcleona, Catalonia, Spain.
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
- Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Screening, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari. Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT_CERCA), Sabadell, Spain.
- Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Screening, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Parc Taulí, 1, Sabadell, 08208, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pohontsch NJ, Hense H, Lentsch V. [Introduction to qualitative evidence synthesis - Variants and application]. DIE REHABILITATION 2024; 63:238-246. [PMID: 38588694 DOI: 10.1055/a-2263-1270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
Qualitative evidence syntheses (QES) are still uncommon in German rehabilitation research, although robust syntheses of qualitative evidence may lead to more strongly scientifically based decisions in health care. This article introduces the topic of qualitative evidence synthesis by describing three different synthesis methods - thematic synthesis, meta-ethnography, and grounded theory synthesis - and illustrating them with examples from rehabilitation research. This is followed by guidance on selecting the appropriate QES-method and reflections on the challenges of QES that are associated with the literature search and quality assessment of the studies to be included in the synthesis. Likewise considerations on quality criteria and their application are taken into account. GRADE-CERQual provides guidance for assessing confidence of findings from QES. Finally the value of QES for rehabilitation research is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helene Hense
- Zentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung (ZEGV), Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus der Technischen Universität Dresden
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Silveira Bianchim M, Caes L, Forbat L, Jordan A, Noyes J, Thomson K, Turley R, Uny I, France EF. Understanding how children and young people with chronic non-cancer pain and their families experience living with pain, pain management and services: a meta-ethnography. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2024; 12:1-218. [PMID: 39046284 DOI: 10.3310/utpm7986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
Background Childhood chronic pain is a widespread public health issue. We need to understand how children with chronic pain and their families experience chronic pain and its management. Objectives To conduct a meta-ethnography on the experiences and perceptions of children with chronic pain and their families of chronic pain, treatments and services. We investigated how children and their families conceptualise and live with chronic pain; what they think of and want from health and social care services; and what they conceptualise as 'good' pain management. Design Meta-ethnography with stakeholder and patient and public involvement in the design, search and sampling strategies, analysis and dissemination. Review strategy: comprehensive searches of 12 bibliographic databases and supplementary searches in September 2022, to identify qualitative studies with children aged 3 months to 18 years with chronic non-cancer pain and their families. We included studies with rich explanatory data; appraised methodological limitations using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool; and extracted, analysed and synthesised studies' findings. We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-confidence in the evidence from reviews of qualitative research to assess confidence in review findings. We integrated findings with 14 Cochrane treatment effectiveness reviews on children's chronic non-cancer pain. Results We synthesised 43 studies sampled from 170 eligible studies reported in 182 publications. Studies had minor (n = 24) or moderate (n = 19) methodological limitations. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-confidence in the evidence from reviews of qualitative research assessments of review findings were high (n = 22), moderate (n = 13) or very low confidence (n = 1). Moderate and severe chronic pain had profound adverse impacts on family members' well-being, autonomy and self-identity; family dynamics; parenting approaches; friendships and socialising; children's education and parental paid employment. Most children and families sought a biomedical cure for pain. They experienced difficulties seeking and receiving support from health services to manage pain and its impacts. Consequently, some families repeatedly visited health services. Cochrane reviews of intervention effects and trials did not measure some outcomes important to children and families, for example effects of pain on the family and resolution of pain. Reviews have mainly neglected a biopsychosocial approach when considering how interventions work. Limitations There were limited data on common pain conditions like migraine/headache, abdominal pain; some rarer conditions; children with learning disabilities and under-fives; siblings; fathers and experiences of treatments/services. We excluded studies on cancer, end-of-life pain and experiences of healthcare professionals. Conclusions We developed the family-centred theory of children's chronic pain management, integrating health and social care with community support. Future work Future research should explore families' experiences of services and treatments, including opioids, and social care services; experiences of children with autism and learning disabilities, under 5 years old and with certain common pain conditions. We need development and testing of family-centred interventions and services. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO (CRD42019161455) and Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care (623). Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128671) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 17. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayara Silveira Bianchim
- Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Line Caes
- Division of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Liz Forbat
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Abbie Jordan
- Department of Psychology and Bath Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Jane Noyes
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Katie Thomson
- Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Ruth Turley
- Freelance Researcher, Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Isabelle Uny
- Institute of Social Marketing, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Emma F France
- Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sekhon M, de Thurah A, Fragoulis GE, Schoones J, Stamm TA, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Esbensen BA, Lempp H, Bearne L, Kouloumas M, Pchelnikova P, Swinnen TW, Blunt C, Ferreira RJO, Carmona L, Nikiphorou E. Synthesis of guidance available for assessing methodological quality and grading of evidence from qualitative research to inform clinical recommendations: a systematic literature review. RMD Open 2024; 10:e004032. [PMID: 38886002 PMCID: PMC11184179 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-004032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To understand (1) what guidance exists to assess the methodological quality of qualitative research; (2) what methods exist to grade levels of evidence from qualitative research to inform recommendations within European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR). METHODS A systematic literature review was performed in multiple databases including PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, COCHRANE and PsycINFO, from inception to 23 October 2020. Eligible studies included primary articles and guideline documents available in English, describing the: (1) development; (2) application of validated tools (eg, checklists); (3) guidance on assessing methodological quality of qualitative research and (4) guidance on grading levels of qualitative evidence. A narrative synthesis was conducted to identify key similarities between included studies. RESULTS Of 9073 records retrieved, 51 went through to full-manuscript review, with 15 selected for inclusion. Six articles described methodological tools to assess the quality of qualitative research. The tools evaluated research design, recruitment, ethical rigour, data collection and analysis. Seven articles described one approach, focusing on four key components to determine how much confidence to place in findings from systematic reviews of qualitative research. Two articles focused on grading levels of clinical recommendations based on qualitative evidence; one described a qualitative evidence hierarchy, and another a research pyramid. CONCLUSION There is a lack of consensus on the use of tools, checklists and approaches suitable for appraising the methodological quality of qualitative research and the grading of qualitative evidence to inform clinical practice. This work is expected to facilitate the inclusion of qualitative evidence in the process of developing recommendations at EULAR level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandeep Sekhon
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Annette de Thurah
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Jan Schoones
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Directorate of research Policy, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Tanja A Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Theodora P M Vliet Vlieland
- Dept of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Bente Appel Esbensen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (Copecare), Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Lindsay Bearne
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Thijs Willem Swinnen
- Division of Rheumatology, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chris Blunt
- London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Ricardo J O Ferreira
- Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Nursing School of Lisbon (ESEL), Lisbon, Portugal
- Instituto de Saúde Ambiental (ISAMB), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Thrower NE, Berry K, Johnston I, Morris L. Understanding the Factors That Contribute to Creating a Collaborative Psychological Formulation: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Clin Psychol Psychother 2024; 31:e2998. [PMID: 38890793 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Creating a formulation is one of the key competencies of a clinical psychologist and is understood to be important for guiding therapeutic input and understanding client distress. However, client experience of formulations can vary, with some reporting it is unhelpful and distressing. This novel review explores the experiences of clinicians and clients when creating a formulation, specifically the barriers and facilitators to collaborating on a formulation. This ultimately aims to improve client experience and engagement in formulation. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO and EMBASE was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO. This search was conducted using terms related to 'psychological formulation' and 'experience'. Nineteen qualitative papers met inclusion criteria and were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Findings that pertained to formulation were thematically synthesised. RESULTS Three analytical themes were identified: toleration of the formulation process-'a necessary evil', which highlights the potential emotional impact of formulation on the client and indicates the importance of responding to client readiness and expectations of formulation; development of the therapeutic relationship-'it's like a two way thing, isn't it?', which suggests that client empowerment, adapting to client needs and clinicians creating a safe and containing environment facilitated the formulation process; systemic factors-'walking a tightrope', which highlights the constraints of resources and team dynamics in therapists' ability to engage in collaborative formulation. CONCLUSION Facilitators to a collaborative formulation include the following: simple formulations, thorough assessment and preparation for formulation, 'doing with' activities such as timelines and diagrams and working environments that include supportive colleagues and time for reflection and training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi E Thrower
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Katherine Berry
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Research and Innovation, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Greater Manchester, Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Isobel Johnston
- Research and Innovation, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Greater Manchester, Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Lydia Morris
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Park A, van Draanen J. Community-Partnered Research appraisal tool for conducting, reporting and assessing community-based research. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e081625. [PMID: 38670613 PMCID: PMC11057323 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to develop an appraisal tool to support and promote clear, accurate and transparent standards and consistency when conducting, reporting and assessing community-based research. Design Current recommendations for developing reporting guidelines was used with three key differences: (1) an analysis of existing guides, principles and published literature about community engagement, involvement and participation in research using situational and relational maps; (2) feedback and pilot-testing by a community-based research team; and (3) testing the utility and usability of the appraisal tool. Results After a series of iterative revisions, the resulting Community-Partnered Research (CPR) appraisal tool emerged into three products: an elaborate prospective format, a basic retrospective format, and a supplemental checklist format. All three versions of the CPR appraisal tool consist of 11 main question items with corresponding prompts aimed to facilitate awareness, accountability, and transparency about processes and practices employed by professional researchers and community co-researchers throughout four phases of research: (1) partnership and planning, (2) methods, (3) results and (4) sustainment. Conclusion We hope that introducing this tool will contribute to shifting individual and systematic processes and practices towards equitable partnerships, mutual trustworthiness and empowerment among professional researchers and community co-researchers and, in turn, improving the quality of co-created knowledge that benefits communities and creates social change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avery Park
- University of Washington - Seattle Campus, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jenna van Draanen
- Child, Family, and Population Health Nursing; Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Adsul N, Tyagi J, Bhaumik S. Community health workers for health systems resilience during COVID-19: protocol for qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e074920. [PMID: 38531568 PMCID: PMC10973548 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION COVID-19 exposed the fragility of health systems, where even the most basic health services in high-income and low-income and middle-income nations could not withstand the health systems shock due to the pandemic. Community health workers (CHWs) can contribute to improving the resilience of health systems, specifically to withstand shocks and emergencies and to avoid disruptions of routine service delivery. We aim to explore and understand the 'individual' and 'systems-level' resilience factors that shaped the involvement of CHWs in the COVID-19 response. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will search five electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL and SciELO (Spanish)) and conduct citation screening to identify studies on CHWs' response during the COVID-19 pandemic. Two review authors will independently screen the studies for inclusion and to extract data. The software Rayyan will be used to assist in screening the relevant literature. A thematic analysis approach will be followed to analyse and synthesise the qualitative evidence. The quality of the included studies will be critically assessed using the Critical Skills Appraisal Programme Tool. We will use the GRADE CERQual(Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations - Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research) approach to assess certainty in the synthesised findings of the qualitative evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study will be conducted on published evidence, with no living participants; thus, no ethical approval is required. The final review will be submitted and published in a peer-reviewed journal. We will also develop a policy brief to communicate the review findings to the stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neha Adsul
- Meta-research and Evidence Synthesis Unit, The George Institute for Global Health India, New Delhi, India
| | - Jyoti Tyagi
- Meta-research and Evidence Synthesis Unit, The George Institute for Global Health India, New Delhi, India
| | - Soumyadeep Bhaumik
- Meta-research and Evidence Synthesis Unit, The George Institute for Global Health India, New Delhi, India
- The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 7: Qualitative evidence synthesis for emerging themes in primary care research: Scoping review, meta-ethnography and rapid realist review. Eur J Gen Pract 2023; 29:2274467. [PMID: 37902265 PMCID: PMC10990260 DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2023.2274467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
This article, the seventh in a series aiming to provide practical guidance for qualitative research in primary care, introduces qualitative synthesis research for addressing health themes in primary care research. Qualitative synthesis combines rigorous processes and authorial judgement to present the collective meaning of research outputs; the findings of qualitative studies - and sometimes mixed-methods and quantitative research - are pooled. We describe three exemplary designs: the scoping review, the meta-ethnography and the rapid realist review. Scoping reviews aim to provide an overview of the evidence/knowledge or to answer questions regarding the nature and diversity of the evidence/knowledge available. Meta-ethnographies intend to systematically compare data from primary qualitative studies to identify and develop new overarching concepts, theories, and models. Rapid realist reviews aim to provide a knowledge synthesis by looking at complex questions while responding to time-sensitive and emerging issues. It addresses the question, 'what works, for whom, in what circumstances, and how?'We discuss these three designs' context, what, why, when and how. We provide examples of published studies and sources for further reading, including manuals and guidelines for conducting and reporting these studies. Finally, we discuss attention points for the research team concerning the involvement of necessary experts and stakeholders and choices to be made during the research process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albine Moser
- Faculty of Health Care, Research Centre Autonomy and Participation of Chronically Ill People, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Department of Family Medicine and Department of Health Service Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Irene Korstjens
- Faculty of Health Care, Research Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
France E, Uny I, Turley R, Thomson K, Noyes J, Jordan A, Forbat L, Caes L, Silveira Bianchim M. A meta-ethnography of how children and young people with chronic non-cancer pain and their families experience and understand their condition, pain services, and treatments. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 10:CD014873. [PMID: 37795766 PMCID: PMC10552070 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014873.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic non-cancer pain in childhood is widespread, affecting 20% to 35% of children and young people worldwide. For a sizeable number of children, chronic non-cancer pain has considerable negative impacts on their lives and quality of life, and leads to increased use of healthcare services and medication. In many countries, there are few services for managing children's chronic non-cancer pain, with many services being inadequate. Fourteen Cochrane Reviews assessing the effects of pharmacological, psychological, psychosocial, dietary or physical activity interventions for managing children's chronic non-cancer pain identified a lack of high-quality evidence to inform pain management. To design and deliver services and interventions that meet the needs of patients and their families, we need to understand how children with chronic non-cancer pain and their families experience pain, their views of services and treatments for chronic pain, and which outcomes are important to them. OBJECTIVES 1. To synthesise qualitative studies that examine the experiences and perceptions of children with chronic non-cancer pain and their families regarding chronic non-cancer pain, treatments and services to inform the design and delivery of health and social care services, interventions and future research. 2. To explore whether our review findings help to explain the results of Cochrane Reviews of intervention effects of treatments for children's chronic non-cancer pain. 3. To determine if programme theories and outcomes of interventions match children and their families' views of desired treatments and outcomes. 4. To use our findings to inform the selection and design of patient-reported outcome measures for use in chronic non-cancer pain studies and interventions and care provision to children and their families. The review questions are: 1. How do children with chronic non-cancer pain and their families conceptualise chronic pain? 2. How do children with chronic non-cancer pain and their families live with chronic pain? 3. What do children with chronic non-cancer pain and their families think of how health and social care services respond to and manage their child's chronic pain? 4. What do children with chronic non-cancer pain and their families conceptualise as 'good' chronic pain management and what do they want to achieve from chronic pain management interventions and services? SEARCH METHODS Review strategy: we comprehensively searched 12 bibliographic databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo and grey literature sources, and conducted supplementary searches in 2020. We updated the database searches in September 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA To identify published and unpublished qualitative research with children aged 3 months to 18 years with chronic non-cancer pain and their families focusing on their perceptions, experiences and views of chronic pain, services and treatments. The final inclusion criteria were agreed with a patient and public involvement group of children and young people with chronic non-cancer pain and their families. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We conducted a qualitative evidence synthesis using meta-ethnography, a seven-phase, systematic, interpretive, inductive methodology that takes into account the contexts and meanings of the original studies. We assessed the richness of eligible studies and purposively sampled rich studies ensuring they addressed the review questions. Cochrane Qualitative Methods Implementation Group guidance guided sampling. We assessed the methodological limitations of studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. We extracted data on study aims, focus, characteristics and conceptual findings from study reports using NVivo software. We compared these study data to determine how the studies related to one another and grouped studies by pain conditions for synthesis. We used meta-ethnography to synthesise each group of studies separately before synthesising them all together. Analysis and interpretation of studies involved children with chronic non-cancer pain and their families and has resulted in theory to inform service design and delivery. Sampling, organising studies for synthesis, and analysis and interpretation involved our patient and public involvement group who contributed throughout the conduct of the review. We used the GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach to assess our confidence in each review finding. We used a matrix approach to integrate our findings with existing Cochrane Reviews on treatment effectiveness for children's chronic non-cancer pain. MAIN RESULTS We synthesised 43 studies sampled from 170 eligible studies reported in 182 publications. Included studies involved 633 participants. GRADE-CERQual assessments of findings were mostly high (n = 21, 58%) or moderate (n = 12, 33%) confidence with three (8%) low or very low confidence. Poorly managed, moderate or severe chronic non-cancer pain had profound adverse impacts on family dynamics and relationships; family members' emotions, well-being, autonomy and sense of self-identity; parenting strategies; friendships and socialising; children's education and future employment prospects; and parental employment. Most children and parents understood chronic non-cancer pain as having an underlying biological cause and wanted curative treatment. However, families had difficulties seeking and obtaining support from health services to manage their child's pain and its impacts. Children and parents felt that healthcare professionals did not always listen to their experiences and expertise, or believe the child's pain. Some families repeatedly visited health services seeking a diagnosis and cure. Over time, some children and families gave up hope of effective treatment. Outcomes measured within trials and Cochrane Reviews of intervention effects did not include some outcomes of importance to children and families, including impacts of pain on the whole family and absence of pain. Cochrane Reviews have mainly neglected a holistic biopsychosocial approach, which specifies the interrelatedness of biological, psychological and social aspects of illness, when selecting outcome measures and considering how chronic pain management interventions work. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We had high or moderate confidence in the evidence contributing to most review findings. Further research, especially into families' experiences of treatments and services, could strengthen the evidence for low or very low confidence findings. Future research should also explore families' experiences in low- to middle-income contexts; of pain treatments including opioid use in children, which remains controversial; and of social care services. We need development and testing of family-centred interventions and services acceptable to families. Future trials of children's chronic non-cancer pain interventions should include family-centred outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma France
- NMAHP Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Isabelle Uny
- Institute of Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Ruth Turley
- Development Directorate, Cochrane Central Executive, Cochrane, London, UK
| | - Katie Thomson
- Occupational Therapy, Human Nutrition & Dietetics, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jane Noyes
- Centre for Health-Related Research, Fron Heulog, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Abbie Jordan
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
- Bath Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Liz Forbat
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Line Caes
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Mayara Silveira Bianchim
- NMAHP Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
- Centre for Population Health and Wellbeing Research, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Davoren N, McEleney A, Corcoran S, Tierney P, Fortune DG. Refugees and asylum seekers who have experienced trauma: Thematic synthesis of therapeutic boundary considerations. Clin Psychol Psychother 2023. [PMID: 37658701 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Therapeutic boundaries are limits to appropriate behaviours within a therapist-client relationship (e.g. related to accepting gifts, self-disclosures, therapist neutrality and advocacy). Therapeutic boundary considerations are fundamental in the care of refugees and asylum seekers. Research on the experiences of therapists navigating such boundaries is sparse and warrants further exploration. The aim of this qualitative systematic review was to thematically synthesise literature regarding therapists' (psychologists, psychotherapists, counsellors) experiences of implementing flexible therapeutic boundaries with refugee and asylum seeker clients and determine how such applications have been helpful for therapeutic interventions. METHOD Six databases were searched. Following full-text screening, 21 papers were included in the analysis. Boundary theory underpinned the analysis. RESULTS Three major themes were developed: (i) Changes to Therapeutic Practice & Therapeutic Intervention, (ii) Re-Conceptualisation of Therapy as 'Clinical Political' and Re-Conceptualisation of Therapist Identity and (iii) Careful Monitoring of Personal Boundaries-Not becoming 'Hardened' or 'Haunted'. Papers described how, when used in a reflective, considerate way, flexible therapeutic boundaries can strengthen the therapist-client alliance and positively impact therapeutic interventions. Many therapists acknowledged making conscious efforts to re-conceptualise therapeutic work with refugee and asylum seeker clients from advocacy standpoints. However, systemic constraints, and lack of guidance, made this difficult to navigate and contributed to therapist burn-out. CONCLUSIONS Boundary considerations manifested as interpersonal, structural and cultural changes to practice. These have implications for clinical practice and developing guidelines on boundary practices with refugees and asylum seekers. Future research should explore promoting therapist well-being and training needs for therapists supporting this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niamh Davoren
- Department of Psychology, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Alice McEleney
- Department of Psychology, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Santhi Corcoran
- Department of Psychology, Mary Immaculate College, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Phelim Tierney
- Department of Psychology, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Dónal G Fortune
- Department of Psychology, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Service Executive, Mid-West Region, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stelle I, Kinshella MLW, Moore SE. Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 2023; 26:1907-1916. [PMID: 37349869 PMCID: PMC10478058 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980023001246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Efficacy studies show early nutrition interventions improving infant nutrition status, but understanding caregiver acceptability is required for implementation of such interventions. This systematic review examines caregivers' perceptions of nutrition interventions in young children. DESIGN We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO from date of online journal inception through December 2020. Interventions included oral (powder/liquid/tablet) and/or intravenous supplementation, food fortification and nutrition counselling. Inclusion criteria included primary research, data presented on caregiver perception and studies published in English. Quality assessment was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Studies underwent narrative synthesis using inductive thematic analysis. SETTING No restriction. PARTICIPANTS Caregivers of children under 24 months of age. RESULTS Of 11 798 records identified, thirty-seven publications were included. Interventions included oral supplementation, food fortification and nutrition counselling. Caregivers included mothers (83 %), fathers, grandparents and aunts. Perceptions were gathered through individual interviews, focus group discussions, questionnaires, surveys and ratings. Totally, 89 % of studies noted high acceptability (n 33 most notably increased appetite (n 17). In total, 57 % of studies (n 21) cited low acceptability, commonly from side effects (n 13) such as gastrointestinal issues, appetite loss and stained teeth. CONCLUSIONS Positive perceptions and enthusiasm for interventions were frequently reported. Key to implementation was the increased appetite noted by caregivers. A substantial proportion of studies reported negative perceptions, mainly due to side effects. In future interventions, mitigation and education around common side effects are crucial for acceptability. Understanding both positive and negative caregiver perceptions is important for informing future nutrition interventions and strengthening sustainability and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Stelle
- Department of Women and Children’s Health, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, Westminster Bridge Rd, LondonSE1 7EH, UK
| | - Mai-Lei Woo Kinshella
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, VancouverBC, Canada
| | - Sophie E Moore
- Department of Women and Children’s Health, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, Westminster Bridge Rd, LondonSE1 7EH, UK
- Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tay KLY, Osman AR, Yeoh EEX, Luangboriboon J, Lau JF, Chan JJA, Yousif M, Tse BYH, Horgan G, Gamble DT, Myint PK. Ultrafiltration versus Diuretics on Prognostic Cardiac and Renal Biomarkers in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2023; 12:2793. [PMID: 37109130 PMCID: PMC10141346 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12082793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Existing systematic reviews have insufficiently delineated the differing cardiac and renal profile of ultrafiltration compared to diuretics as a method of decongestion in acute decompensated heart failure. This meta-analysis will investigate the impact of ultrafiltration compared to diuretics on prognostic cardiac and renal biomarkers. We searched PubMed Central, Ovid MEDLINE®, Ovid Embase, all EBM reviews, and Web of Science Core Collection for randomised controlled trials published before 21 July 2022. Our main outcome measures were cardiac (brain natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide) and renal biomarkers (serum creatinine, serum sodium, and blood urea nitrogen). A total of 10 randomised trials were included in our analysis after screening. An inverse-variance random effects meta-analysis of the pooled results demonstrated no significant difference between ultrafiltration and diuretics for brain natriuretic peptide, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, creatinine, sodium and long-term blood urea nitrogen. However, ultrafiltration produced statistically greater increases in blood urea nitrogen in the short-term (mean difference, 3.88; 95% confidence interval 0.59-7.17 mg/dL). Overall, ultrafiltration produces a similar impact on prognostic cardiac and renal biomarkers when compared to diuretic therapy. We highlight ultrafiltration's significant impact on short-term BUN and recommend further research to investigate more optimal protocols of ultrafiltration administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsty Luo-Yng Tay
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Abdel Rahman Osman
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Esyn Ee Xin Yeoh
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Jasmine Luangboriboon
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Jie Fei Lau
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Joanne Jia An Chan
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Majed Yousif
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Benjamin Yi Hong Tse
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Graham Horgan
- Biomathematics & Statistics Scotland, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - David T. Gamble
- Ageing Clinical & Experimental Research (ACER) Team, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
- Aberdeen Cardiovascular & Diabetes Centre (ACDC), Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Phyo Kyaw Myint
- Ageing Clinical & Experimental Research (ACER) Team, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
- Aberdeen Cardiovascular & Diabetes Centre (ACDC), Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Battista S, Lazzaretti A, Coppola I, Falsiroli Maistrello L, Rania N, Testa M. Living with migraine: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1129926. [PMID: 37057143 PMCID: PMC10086165 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
IntroductionMigraine is one of the top ten causes of disability worldwide. However, migraine is still underrated in society, and the quality of care for this disease is scant. Qualitative research allows for giving voice to people and understanding the impact of their disease through their experience of it. This study aims at synthesising the state of the art of qualitative studies focused on how people with migraine experience their life and pathology.MethodsMEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library were consulted up to November 2021 for qualitative studies. Studies to be eligible had to focus on adults (age > 18 years) with a diagnosis of primary episodic or chronic migraine following the International Classification of Headache. The quality of the study was analysed using the CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) tool. The synthesis was done through a thematic analysis. CERQual (Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach was used to assess the confidence in retrieved evidence.ResultsTen studies were included, counting 262 people with migraine. Our synthesis produced four main themes. (1) “Negative impact of migraine symptoms on overall life” as migraine negatively impacts people's whole life. (2) “Impact of migraine on family, work and social relationship” as migraine reduces the possibility to focus at work and interact with people. (3) “Impact of migraine on emotional health” as people with migraine experience psychological distress. (4) “Coping strategies to deal with migraine” such as keep on living one's own life, no matter the symptoms.ConclusionsMigraine negatively impacts people's whole life, from private to social and work sphere. People with migraine feel stigmatised as others struggle with understanding their condition. Hence, it is necessary to improve awareness among society of this disabling condition, and the quality of care of these people, tackling this disease from a social and health-policy point of view.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Battista
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Savona, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopaedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Arianna Lazzaretti
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Savona, Italy
| | - Ilaria Coppola
- Department of Education Sciences, School of Social Sciences, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Luca Falsiroli Maistrello
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Savona, Italy
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, AULSS9 Scaligera, G. Fracastoro Hospital, San Bonifacio, Verona, Italy
| | - Nadia Rania
- Department of Education Sciences, School of Social Sciences, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Marco Testa
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Savona, Italy
- *Correspondence: Marco Testa
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
van Draanen J, Jamula R, Karamouzian M, Mitra S, Richardson L. Pathways connecting socioeconomic marginalization and overdose: A qualitative narrative synthesis. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2023; 113:103971. [PMID: 36822011 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.103971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This qualitative narrative synthesis sought to identify pathways connecting socioeconomic marginalization (SEM) and overdose for people who use drugs. METHODS We included studies with qualitative examination of SEM and fatal and non-fatal overdose published in English between 2000 and 2021. Studies were systematically identified and screened by searching MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Google Scholar, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Cochrane Drug and Alcohol Group (CDAG) Specialized Registry, citations, and contacting experts. Risk of bias and quality assessments were performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist and the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research approach. Data were synthesized using a thematic synthesis approach. RESULTS The primary search strategy found 5909 articles that met the initial screening criteria. The review and screening process led to a final dataset of 27 qualitative articles. The four key findings of this narrative synthesis revealed aspects of SEM which shaped drug poisoning risk for people who use drugs: (1) resource insufficiency, labor market exclusion and deindustrialization, (2) homelessness and housing, (3) policing, criminalization, and interactions with emergency services, and (4) gendered and racialized dimensions of inequality. Findings led to creating a typology that includes material, behavioral, psychological, social, and environmental pathways that contain multiple mechanisms connecting SEM to overdose. This review revealed reciprocal connections between overdose and SEM via institutional pathways with reinforcing mechanisms, and interrelationships present within and between pathways. Quality assessments indicated moderate confidence in three of four findings (Findings 2,3, and 4 above) and high confidence in one finding (Finding 1). CONCLUSION SEM is strongly linked to drug poisoning, and the mechanisms establishing these connections can be classified within four pathways. The interconnectedness of these mechanisms can lead to intensification of overdose risk and reinforcement of SEM itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna van Draanen
- BC Centre on Substance Use, 400 - 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada; University of British Columbia, Faculty of Arts, Department of Sociology, 6303 NW Marine Drive, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada; Department of Child, Family, and Population Health Nursing; School of Nursing; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Health Systems and Population Health; School of Public Health; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ryan Jamula
- BC Centre on Substance Use, 400 - 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada; University of British Columbia, Faculty of Arts, Department of Sociology, 6303 NW Marine Drive, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada
| | - Mohammad Karamouzian
- BC Centre on Substance Use, 400 - 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada; Brown School of Public Health, Brown University, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA; HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, 7616913555, Iran; Centre On Drug Policy Evaluation, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sanjana Mitra
- BC Centre on Substance Use, 400 - 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada; University of British Columbia, Interdisciplinary Studies Graduate Program, 270, 2357 Main Mall, H. R. MacMillan Building, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada; Centre On Drug Policy Evaluation, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lindsey Richardson
- BC Centre on Substance Use, 400 - 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada; University of British Columbia, Faculty of Arts, Department of Sociology, 6303 NW Marine Drive, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
“I Always Knew I Was Different”: Experiences of Receiving a Diagnosis of Autistic Spectrum Disorder in Adulthood—a Meta-Ethnographic Systematic Review. REVIEW JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s40489-023-00356-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
AbstractA broadening of diagnostic criteria and increased awareness of autism has led to a large number of individuals whose difficulties remained undetected until adulthood. This systematic review aimed to synthesise empirical evidence of the experience of individuals who received their diagnosis of autism in adulthood. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. A meta-ethnographic approach was used to synthesise the findings. Analysis revealed two meta-themes: feeling “like an alien” and the “not guilty” verdict, each with three associated subthemes. The findings indicate the need for timely diagnosis and provision of post-diagnostic support to alleviate the mental health implications of not having a framework to understand one’s experiences and to support the process of adjustment to the diagnosis.
Collapse
|
16
|
Fraser SDS, Stannard S, Holland E, Boniface M, Hoyle RB, Wilkinson R, Akbari A, Ashworth M, Berrington A, Chiovoloni R, Enright J, Francis NA, Giles G, Gulliford M, Macdonald S, Mair FS, Owen RK, Paranjothy S, Parsons H, Sanchez-Garcia RJ, Shiranirad M, Zlatev Z, Alwan N. Multidisciplinary ecosystem to study lifecourse determinants and prevention of early-onset burdensome multimorbidity (MELD-B) - protocol for a research collaboration. JOURNAL OF MULTIMORBIDITY AND COMORBIDITY 2023; 13:26335565231204544. [PMID: 37766757 PMCID: PMC10521301 DOI: 10.1177/26335565231204544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
Background Most people living with multiple long-term condition multimorbidity (MLTC-M) are under 65 (defined as 'early onset'). Earlier and greater accrual of long-term conditions (LTCs) may be influenced by the timing and nature of exposure to key risk factors, wider determinants or other LTCs at different life stages. We have established a research collaboration titled 'MELD-B' to understand how wider determinants, sentinel conditions (the first LTC in the lifecourse) and LTC accrual sequence affect risk of early-onset, burdensome MLTC-M, and to inform prevention interventions. Aim Our aim is to identify critical periods in the lifecourse for prevention of early-onset, burdensome MLTC-M, identified through the analysis of birth cohorts and electronic health records, including artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced analyses. Design We will develop deeper understanding of 'burdensomeness' and 'complexity' through a qualitative evidence synthesis and a consensus study. Using safe data environments for analyses across large, representative routine healthcare datasets and birth cohorts, we will apply AI methods to identify early-onset, burdensome MLTC-M clusters and sentinel conditions, develop semi-supervised learning to match individuals across datasets, identify determinants of burdensome clusters, and model trajectories of LTC and burden accrual. We will characterise early-life (under 18 years) risk factors for early-onset, burdensome MLTC-M and sentinel conditions. Finally, using AI and causal inference modelling, we will model potential 'preventable moments', defined as time periods in the life course where there is an opportunity for intervention on risk factors and early determinants to prevent the development of MLTC-M. Patient and public involvement is integrated throughout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon DS Fraser
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, Southampton, UK
| | - Sebastian Stannard
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Emilia Holland
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Michael Boniface
- School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Rebecca B Hoyle
- School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Ashley Akbari
- Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Mark Ashworth
- School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Ann Berrington
- Department of Social Statistics and Demography, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Roberta Chiovoloni
- Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | | | - Nick A Francis
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Gareth Giles
- Public Policy Southampton, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Martin Gulliford
- School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sara Macdonald
- School of Health and Wellbeing, General Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Frances S Mair
- School of Health and Wellbeing, General Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Rhiannon K Owen
- Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Shantini Paranjothy
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- NHS Grampian Health Board, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Heather Parsons
- Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Ruben J Sanchez-Garcia
- School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK
| | - Mozhdeh Shiranirad
- School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Zlatko Zlatev
- School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Nisreen Alwan
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
- Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Exploring experiences and needs of perinatal women in digital healthcare: A meta-ethnography of qualitative evidence. Int J Med Inform 2023; 169:104929. [PMID: 36435014 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this review is to identify, appraise, and synthesize the available qualitative evidence on the experiences and needs of perinatal women by using digital technologies in healthcare. METHODS This review was consolidated following the eMERGe meta-ethnography reporting guidance. We conducted a comprehensive search in eight databases from inception to 12 October 2021. Published and unpublished qualitative and mixed-method studies published in English were included. The methodological quality was assessed using the critical appraisal skill program checklist. A meta-ethnographic synthesis was used according to Noblit and Hare's seven-step iterative process. RESULTS A total of 3,843 articles were retrieved, and 27 qualitative studies pertaining to 3,775 perinatal women from 13 countries across different ethnicities were included. Four overarching themes emerged for the aspect of experiences: (1) normalization of experience, (2) attainment of valuable knowledge, (3) empowerment and self-confidence boosting, and (4) beneficial features of digital platforms. For the aspect of needs, the derived themes included the following: (1) necessity of credible resources, (2) importance of personalization, (3) concern about cybersecurity, and (4) urging additional support. Our line-of-argument for interpreting the perinatal women's experiences can offer a much greater engagement in digital healthcare, while the findings on the perinatal women's needs can add value for improving the design of digital healthcare in the future. CONCLUSION This review offers a deeper understanding of the perinatal women's experiences and needs when using digital technologies in healthcare. Our findings provide meaningful recommendations for clinical practice and future research.
Collapse
|
18
|
Zary N, Healy D, Barry M, Brennan A, Redfern S, Houghton C, Casey D. Key Stakeholders' Experiences and Perceptions of Virtual Reality for Older Adults Living With Dementia: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis. JMIR Serious Games 2022; 10:e37228. [PMID: 36563042 PMCID: PMC9823606 DOI: 10.2196/37228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technology is increasingly being used and evolving in the dementia care landscape. One such technology that has gained traction over the last decade is virtual reality (VR). VR is being applied in many areas of dementia care, including cognitive assessment and training, reminiscence therapy, music therapy, and other recreational VR applications. Despite the plethora of applications, they are often not shaped by the experiences and perceptions of older adults living with dementia. Currently, there is no qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) to explore this area. This review aimed to provide qualitative evidence supporting existing systematic reviews in this area. OBJECTIVE The aim of this QES was to explore key stakeholders' experiences and perceptions of VR for older adults living with dementia. It aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to VR use and provide recommendations for future design and implementation. METHODS QES was used, which involved a systematic search of 6 databases to identify studies that qualitatively explored key stakeholders' experiences and perceptions of VR for older adults living with dementia. Thematic synthesis was used to integrate the findings of 14 studies (from 15 reports). The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. The confidence placed in the review findings was assessed using the GRADE-CERQUAL (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research). RESULTS A total of 15 reports from 14 studies were included in the review, consisting of a range of levels of VR immersion, stages of dementia, and care contexts. Three analytical themes were generated: stepping into virtuality, a virtual world, and returning to reality. The results indicate the importance of sensitively designing and introducing VR to this population, as older adults living with dementia often have no prior experience of using this technology. VR can be a positive experience for older adults living with dementia and can provide meaningful interactions, positive expressions, and long-term impacts on everyday functioning. However, it should be acknowledged that some negative associations must be accounted for before, during, and after use. CONCLUSIONS This review highlights the positive implications as well as negative associations of VR use. It emphasizes the need for VR design and implementation driven by the needs and views of older adults living with dementia as well as with other key stakeholders. Future research needs to explore the vital role that older adults living with dementia can play in the design process and how they can be empowered to meaningfully design and use this technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Healy
- School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Marguerite Barry
- School of Information and Communication Studies, ADAPT Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Attracta Brennan
- Engineering and Informatics, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Sam Redfern
- Engineering and Informatics, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | | | - Dympna Casey
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Aras Moyola, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
France E, Noyes J, Forbat L, Uny DI, Jordan A, Caes L, Turley R. A meta-ethnography of how children and young people with chronic non-cancer pain and their families experience and understand their condition, pain services, and treatments. Hippokratia 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Emma France
- NMAHP Research Unit; University of Stirling; Stirling UK
| | - Jane Noyes
- Centre for Health-Related Research, Fron Heulog; Bangor University; Bangor UK
| | - Liz Forbat
- Faculty of Social Sciences; University of Stirling; Stirling UK
| | - Dr Isabelle Uny
- Institute of Social Marketing; University of Stirling; Stirling UK
| | - Abbie Jordan
- Department of Psychology; University of Bath; Bath UK
- Bath Centre for Pain Research; University of Bath; Bath UK
| | - Line Caes
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences; University of Stirling; Stirling UK
| | - Ruth Turley
- People Services Team; The Cochrane Collaboration; London UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mukuria C, Connell J, Carlton J, Peasgood T, Scope A, Clowes M, Rand S, Jones K, Brazier J. Qualitative Review on Domains of Quality of Life Important for Patients, Social Care Users, and Informal Carers to Inform the Development of the EQ-HWB. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:492-511. [PMID: 35365298 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify the themes to inform the content of a new generic measure, the EQ-HWB (EQ Health and Wellbeing), that can be used in economic evaluation across health, social care, and public health, based on the views of users and beneficiaries of these services including informal carers. METHODS A qualitative review was undertaken. Systematic and citation searches were undertaken focusing on qualitative evidence of the impact on quality of life from reviews for selected health conditions, informal carers, social care users, and primary qualitative work used in the development of selected measures. A subset of studies was included in the review. Framework analysis and synthesis were undertaken based on a conceptual model. RESULTS A total of 42 reviews and 24 primary studies were selected for inclusion in the review. Extraction and synthesis resulted in 7 high-level themes (with subthemes): (1) feelings and emotions (sadness, anxiety, hope, frustration, safety, guilt/shame); (2) cognition (concentration, memory, confusion, thinking clearly); (3) self-identity (dignity/respect, self-esteem); (4) "coping, autonomy, and control" relationships; (5) social connections (loneliness, social engagement, stigma, support, friendship, belonging, burden); (6) physical sensations (pain, discomfort, sleep, fatigue); and (7) activity (self-care, meaningful activities, mobility, communication, hearing, vision). Apart from physical sensations, most of the other themes and subthemes were relevant across both health and social care, including for informal carers. CONCLUSIONS The findings from this broad review identified themes that go beyond health and that are relevant to patients, informal carers, and social care users. The themes and subthemes informed the domains for the EQ-HWB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - Janice Connell
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Jill Carlton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Tessa Peasgood
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Alison Scope
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Mark Clowes
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, England, UK
| | - Karen Jones
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, England, UK
| | - John Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fernandez Piciochi C, Bimbela Pedrola JL, Sarria Santamera A, Martín Saborido C. Effective transdisciplinarity in diabetes care: PRECEDE Diagnosis. ENDOCRINOL DIAB NUTR 2022; 69:231-233. [PMID: 35353688 DOI: 10.1016/j.endien.2020.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Antonio Sarria Santamera
- Nazarbayev University School of Medicine, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan; REDISSEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wray A, Seymour J, Greenley S, Boland JW. Parental terminal cancer and dependent children: a systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2022:bmjspcare-2021-003094. [PMID: 35091436 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When a parent has terminal cancer, their children are part of that experience. Parents often want to protect their children from their disease and prognosis. Knowledge of dependent children's experience will help ensure they receive appropriate support. To date, there is lack of synthesis of this evidence examining children's perspectives. OBJECTIVES To systematically search and synthesise the qualitative literature exploring the experiences of dependent children when their parent has terminal cancer. METHODS Databases of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Assia and the Cochrane library were searched systematically from inception to July 2020 to determine eligible studies. Included studies were appraised for quality and thematically synthesised using Thomas and Harden's thematic synthesis framework. RESULTS Fourteen studies were included, which interviewed children about their experiences (n=654 children aged 4-18 years at the time of parental death), from six countries. Five descriptive themes were identified, further categorised into two broad themes: (1) finding out about parental cancer and its impact on the family and (2) coping with life with parental cancer, death and beyond. CONCLUSION Children want to be involved in their parent's cancer experience and to help support the family. Healthcare professionals are ideally placed to support and encourage parents to include their children. They should reassure parents that children can cope well and that maintaining normality will help, and explain the benefits of honest and open communication and how they can include dependent children from diagnosis and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Wray
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, Univeristy of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Julie Seymour
- Institiute of Clinical Applied Health Research, Hull York Medical School, Univeristy of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Sarah Greenley
- Institute of Clinical and Applied Health Research, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Jason W Boland
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
- Palliative Medicine, Care Plus Group and St Andrew's Hospice, NE Lincolnshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Roslan NS, Yusoff MSB, Morgan K, Ab Razak A, Ahmad Shauki NI. What Are the Common Themes of Physician Resilience? A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:469. [PMID: 35010729 PMCID: PMC8744634 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
In the practice of medicine, resilience has gained attention as on of the ways to address burnout. Qualitative studies have explored the concept of physician resilience in several contexts. However, individual qualitative studies have limited generalizability, making it difficult to understand the resilience concept in a wider context. This study aims to develop a concept of resilience in the context of physicians' experience through a meta-synthesis of relevant qualitative studies. Using a predetermined search strategy, we identified nine qualitative studies among 450 participants that reported themes of resilience in developed and developing countries, various specialties, and stages of training. We utilized the meta-ethnography method to generate themes and a line-of-argument synthesis. We identified six key themes of resilience: tenacity, resources, reflective ability, coping skills, control, and growth. The line-of-argument synthesis identified resilient physicians as individuals who are determined in their undertakings, have control in their professional lives, reflect on adversity, utilize adaptive coping strategies, and believe that adversity provides an opportunity for growth. Resilient physicians are supported by individual and organizational resources that include nurturing work culture, teamwork, and support from the medical community and at home. Our findings suggest that resilience in physicians is dynamic and must be supported not only by physician-directed interventions but also by organization-directed interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nurhanis Syazni Roslan
- Department of Medical Education, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian 16150, Malaysia
| | - Muhamad Saiful Bahri Yusoff
- Department of Medical Education, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian 16150, Malaysia
| | - Karen Morgan
- Perdana University-Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland School of Medicine, Kuala Lumpur 50490, Malaysia
- Department of Health Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, D02 YN77 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Asrenee Ab Razak
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia and Hospital USM, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian 16150, Malaysia
| | - Nor Izzah Ahmad Shauki
- Institute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health, Shah Alam 40170, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gisselbaek M, Hudelson P, Savoldelli GL. A systematic scoping review of published qualitative research pertaining to the field of perioperative anesthesiology. Can J Anaesth 2021; 68:1811-1821. [PMID: 34608588 PMCID: PMC8563559 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-021-02106-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Qualitative research (QR) take advantage of a wide range of methods and theoretical frameworks to explore people’s beliefs, perspectives, experiences, and behaviours and has been applied to many areas of healthcare. The aim of this review was to explore how QR has contributed to the field of perioperative anesthesiology. Source We performed a systematic scoping review of published QR studies pertaining to the field of perioperative anesthesiology in three databases (CINAHL, Pubmed, and Embase), published between January 2000 and June 2018. We extracted data regarding publication and researchers’ characteristics, main study objectives, and methodological details. Descriptive statistics were generated for each data extraction category. Principal findings A total of 107 articles fulfilled our inclusion criteria. We identified 13 main research topics addressed by the included studies. Topics such as “patient safety,” “barriers to evidence-base medicine,” “patient experiences under local/regional anesthesia,” “training in practice,” “experiences of care,” and “implementation of changes in clinical practice” were commonly tackled. Others, such as “interprofessional communication”, “work environment,” and “patients’/healthcare professionals’ interactions” were less common. Qualitative research was often poorly reported and methodological details were frequently missing. Conclusion Qualitative research has been used to explore an array of issues in perioperative anesthesiology. Some areas may benefit from further primary research, such as interprofessional communication or patient-centred care, while other areas may deserve a detailed systematic knowledge synthesis. We identified suboptimal reporting of qualitative methods and their link to study findings. Increased attention to quality criteria and reporting standards in QR is called for. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12630-021-02106-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia Gisselbaek
- Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Patricia Hudelson
- Department of Primary Care, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Georges L Savoldelli
- Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.,Unit of Development and Research in Medical Education (UDREM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Curran E, Chong TWH, Godbee K, Abraham C, Lautenschlager NT, Palmer VJ. General population perspectives of dementia risk reduction and the implications for intervention: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0257540. [PMID: 34534250 PMCID: PMC8448319 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence for the potential prevention of dementia through lifestyle risk factor modification is growing and has prompted examination of implementation approaches. Understanding the general population's perspectives regarding dementia risk reduction is key to implementation. This may provide useful insights into more effective and efficient ways to help people change relevant beliefs, motivations and behaviour patterns. We conducted a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence to develop an integrated model of general population dementia risk reduction perspectives and the implications for intervention in research and implementation contexts. METHODS AND FINDINGS We searched electronic databases, supplemented by lateral search techniques, to identify studies published since 1995 reporting qualitative dementia risk reduction perspectives of the non-expert general population who do not have dementia. Thematic synthesis, incorporating an expert panel discussion, was used to identify overarching themes and develop an integrated model to guide intervention to support individuals to adopt and maintain dementia risk reduction behaviour patterns. Quality of included studies and confidence in review findings were systematically appraised. We included 50 papers, reflecting the views of more than 4,500 individuals. Main themes were: 1) The need for effective education about a complex topic to prevent confusion and facilitate understanding and empowerment; 2) Personally relevant short- and long-term benefits of dementia risk reduction behaviour patterns can generate value and facilitate action; 3) Individuals benefit from trusted, reliable and sensitive support to convert understanding to personal commitment to relevant behaviour change; 4) Choice, control and relevant self-regulatory supports help individuals take-action and direct their own progress; 5) Collaborative and empowering social opportunities can facilitate and propagate dementia risk reduction behaviour change; 6) Individual behaviour patterns occur in social contexts that influence beliefs through heuristic processes and need to be understood. Findings indicate that, for intervention: 1) education is key, but both content and delivery need to be tailored; 2) complementary interventions to support self-regulation mechanisms and social processes will increase education effectiveness; 3) co-design principles should guide intervention design and delivery processes; 4) all interventions need to be supported by context-specific data. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review and thematic synthesis provides a comprehensive, integrated model of the dementia risk reduction perspectives of the general population and intervention approaches to support behaviour change that can be applied in clinical trial and real-world implementation settings. Findings extend existing knowledge and may assist more effective intervention design and delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Curran
- Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- NorthWestern Mental Health, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Kew, Victoria, Australia
| | - Terence W. H. Chong
- Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- NorthWestern Mental Health, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Kew, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kali Godbee
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Charles Abraham
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicola T. Lautenschlager
- Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- NorthWestern Mental Health, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Victoria J. Palmer
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- The Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Waddell A, Lennox A, Spassova G, Bragge P. Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospitals from policy to practice: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2021; 16:74. [PMID: 34332601 PMCID: PMC8325317 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01142-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Involving patients in their healthcare using shared decision-making (SDM) is promoted through policy and research, yet its implementation in routine practice remains slow. Research into SDM has stemmed from primary and secondary care contexts, and research into the implementation of SDM in tertiary care settings has not been systematically reviewed. Furthermore, perspectives on SDM beyond those of patients and their treating clinicians may add insights into the implementation of SDM. This systematic review aimed to review literature exploring barriers and facilitators to implementing SDM in hospital settings from multiple stakeholder perspectives. Methods The search strategy focused on peer-reviewed qualitative studies with the primary aim of identifying barriers and facilitators to implementing SDM in hospital (tertiary care) settings. Studies from the perspective of patients, clinicians, health service administrators, and decision makers, government policy makers, and other stakeholders (for example researchers) were eligible for inclusion. Reported qualitative results were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify behavioural barriers and facilitators to SDM. Results Titles and abstracts of 8724 articles were screened and 520 were reviewed in full text. Fourteen articles met inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 12) were conducted in the last four years; only four reported perspectives in addition to the patient-clinician dyad. In mapping results to the TDF, the dominant themes were Environmental Context and Resources, Social/Professional Role and Identity, Knowledge and Skills, and Beliefs about Capabilities. A wide range of barriers and facilitators across individual, organisational, and system levels were reported. Barriers specific to the hospital setting included noisy and busy ward environments and a lack of private spaces in which to conduct SDM conversations. Conclusions SDM implementation research in hospital settings appears to be a young field. Future research should build on studies examining perspectives beyond the clinician-patient dyad and further consider the role of organisational- and system-level factors. Organisations wishing to implement SDM in hospital settings should also consider factors specific to tertiary care settings in addition to addressing their organisational and individual SDM needs. Trial Registration The protocol for the review is registered on the Open Science Framework and can be found at https://osf.io/da645/, DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/DA645. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-021-01142-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Waddell
- Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, 8 Scenic Boulevard, Clayton Campus, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia. .,Safer Care Victoria, 50 Lonsdale St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
| | - Alyse Lennox
- Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, 8 Scenic Boulevard, Clayton Campus, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia
| | - Gerri Spassova
- Department of Marketing, Monash Business School, Level 6, Building S, Caulfield Campus 26 Sir John Monash Drive, Caulfield East, VIC, 3145, Australia
| | - Peter Bragge
- Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, 8 Scenic Boulevard, Clayton Campus, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Chesnel MJ, Healy M, McNeill J. The experiences of trained breastfeeding support providers that influence how breastfeeding support is practised: A protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0254445. [PMID: 34324535 PMCID: PMC8321120 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many women stop breastfeeding before they intend to as they cannot overcome breastfeeding difficulties. Breastfeeding support, as an evidence-based intervention by trained lay or professional breastfeeding support providers, can prevent early unintended cessation. Yet some women report dissatisfaction with support and reluctantly stop breastfeeding despite receiving this intervention. Understanding the experiences which shape how support is provided can inform effective implementation of breastfeeding support interventions. This review aims to synthesise experiences of trained breastfeeding support providers in high income settings and how these may influence their breastfeeding support practices. METHODS A qualitative systematic review of trained breastfeeding supporters' experiences of supporting women to breastfeed, as part of a generic healthcare role or focused breastfeeding support role, will be conducted. A systematic search will be performed of the databases: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL +), MEDLINE ALL, Maternity and Infant Care, EMBASE, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science and Scopus. Title and abstract screening using eligibility criteria will be conducted using Covidence software. Eligible papers will be agreed by the review team following full text screening and reported using PRISMA guidelines. CASP and COREQ tools will assess study methodological quality and quality of reporting. Data will be extracted using a bespoke form and coded, using Excel software for data management. Analysis will involve the three stages of thematic synthesis: initial free coding, development of descriptive and subsequent analytical themes. Confidence in findings will be assessed using the CERQual framework. DISCUSSION This review is the first to date to synthesise qualitative evidence on experiences which influence how trained lay and professional providers support women with breastfeeding. Findings will enable deeper understanding of the underpinning mechanisms of breastfeeding support provision and inform the development of tailored interventions to improve breastfeeding rates. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020207380.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Jo Chesnel
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Maria Healy
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Jenny McNeill
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Vasudevan L, Glenton C, Henschke N, Maayan N, Eyers J, Fønhus MS, Tamrat T, Mehl GL, Lewin S. Birth and death notification via mobile devices: a mixed methods systematic review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 7:CD012909. [PMID: 34271590 PMCID: PMC8785898 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012909.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ministries of health, donors, and other decision-makers are exploring how they can use mobile technologies to acquire accurate and timely statistics on births and deaths. These stakeholders have called for evidence-based guidance on this topic. This review was carried out to support World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. OBJECTIVES Primary objective: To assess the effects of birth notification and death notification via a mobile device, compared to standard practice. Secondary objectives: To describe the range of strategies used to implement birth and death notification via mobile devices and identify factors influencing the implementation of birth and death notification via mobile devices. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, the Global Health Library, and POPLINE (August 2, 2019). We searched two trial registries (August 2, 2019). We also searched Epistemonikos for related systematic reviews and potentially eligible primary studies (August 27, 2019). We conducted a grey literature search using mHealthevidence.org (August 15, 2017) and issued a call for papers through popular digital health communities of practice. Finally, we conducted citation searches of included studies in Web of Science and Google Scholar (May 15, 2020). We searched for studies published after 2000 in any language. SELECTION CRITERIA: For the primary objective, we included individual and cluster-randomised trials; cross-over and stepped-wedge study designs; controlled before-after studies, provided they have at least two intervention sites and two control sites; and interrupted time series studies. For the secondary objectives, we included any study design, either quantitative, qualitative, or descriptive, that aimed to describe current strategies for birth and death notification via mobile devices; or to explore factors that influence the implementation of these strategies, including studies of acceptability or feasibility. For the primary objective, we included studies that compared birth and death notification via mobile devices with standard practice. For the secondary objectives, we included studies of birth and death notification via mobile device as long as we could extract data relevant to our secondary objectives. We included studies of all cadres of healthcare providers, including lay health workers; administrative, managerial, and supervisory staff; focal individuals at the village or community level; children whose births were being notified and their parents/caregivers; and individuals whose deaths were being notified and their relatives/caregivers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS For the primary objective, two authors independently screened all records, extracted data from the included studies and assessed risk of bias. For the analyses of the primary objective, we reported means and proportions, where appropriate. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of the evidence and we prepared a 'Summary of Findings' table. For the secondary objectives, two authors screened all records, one author extracted data from the included studies and assessed methodological limitations using the WEIRD tool and a second author checked the data and assessments. We carried out a framework analysis using the Supporting the Use of Research Evidence (SURE) framework to identify themes in the data. We used the GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach to assess our confidence in the evidence and we prepared a 'Summary of Qualitative Findings' table. MAIN RESULTS For the primary objective, we included one study, which used a controlled before-after study design. The study was conducted in Lao People's Democratic Republic and assessed the effect of using mobile devices for birth notification on outcomes related to coverage and timeliness of Hepatitis B vaccination. However, we are uncertain of the effect of this approach on these outcomes because the certainty of this evidence was assessed as very low. The included study did not assess resource use or unintended consequences. For the primary objective, we did not identify any studies using mobile devices for death notification. For the secondary objective, we included 21 studies. All studies were conducted in low- or middle-income settings. They focussed on identification of births and deaths in rural, remote, or marginalised populations who are typically under-represented in civil registration processes or traditionally seen as having poor access to health services. The review identified several factors that could influence the implementation of birth-death notification via mobile device. These factors were tied to the health system, the person responsible for notifying, the community and families; and include: - Geographic barriers that could prevent people's access to birth-death notification and post-notification services - Access to health workers and other notifiers with enough training, supervision, support, and incentives - Monitoring systems that ensure the quality and timeliness of the birth and death data - Legal frameworks that allow births and deaths to be notified by mobile device and by different types of notifiers - Community awareness of the need to register births and deaths - Socio-cultural norms around birth and death - Government commitment - Cost to the system, to health workers and to families - Access to electricity and network connectivity, and compatibility with existing systems - Systems that protect data confidentiality We have low to moderate confidence in these findings. This was mainly because of concerns about methodological limitations and data adequacy. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We need more, well-designed studies of the effect of birth and death notification via mobile devices and on factors that may influence its implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lavanya Vasudevan
- Center for Health Policy and Inequalities Research, Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Tigest Tamrat
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Garrett L Mehl
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Simon Lewin
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
McArthur C, Bai Y, Hewston P, Giangregorio L, Straus S, Papaioannou A. Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based guidelines in long-term care: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Implement Sci 2021; 16:70. [PMID: 34243789 PMCID: PMC8267230 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01140-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The long-term care setting poses unique challenges and opportunities for effective knowledge translation. The objectives of this review are to (1) synthesize barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based guidelines in long-term care, as defined as a home where residents require 24-h nursing care, and 50% of the population is over the age of 65 years; and (2) map barriers and facilitators to the Behaviour Change Wheel framework to inform theory-guided knowledge translation strategies. METHODS Following the guidance of the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group Guidance Series and the ENTREQ reporting guidelines, we systematically reviewed the reported experiences of long-term care staff on implementing evidence-based guidelines into practice. MEDLINE Pubmed, EMBASE Ovid, and CINAHL were searched from the earliest date available until May 2021. Two independent reviewers selected primary studies for inclusion if they were conducted in long-term care and reported the perspective or experiences of long-term care staff with implementing an evidence-based practice guideline about health conditions. Appraisal of the included studies was conducted using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklist and confidence in the findings with the GRADE-CERQual approach. FINDINGS After screening 2680 abstracts, we retrieved 115 full-text articles; 33 of these articles met the inclusion criteria. Barriers included time constraints and inadequate staffing, cost and lack of resources, and lack of teamwork and organizational support. Facilitators included leadership and champions, well-designed strategies, protocols, and resources, and adequate services, resources, and time. The most frequent Behaviour Change Wheel components were physical and social opportunity and psychological capability. We concluded moderate or high confidence in all but one of our review findings. CONCLUSIONS Future knowledge translation strategies to implement guidelines in long-term care should target physical and social opportunity and psychological capability, and include interventions such as environmental restructuring, training, and education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin McArthur
- Dalhousie University, 5869 University Avenue, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4R2, Canada. .,GERAS Centre for Aging Research, 88 Maplewood Avenue, Hamilton, Ontario, L8M 1W9, Canada.
| | - Yuxin Bai
- GERAS Centre for Aging Research, 88 Maplewood Avenue, Hamilton, Ontario, L8M 1W9, Canada.,Master University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Patricia Hewston
- GERAS Centre for Aging Research, 88 Maplewood Avenue, Hamilton, Ontario, L8M 1W9, Canada.,Master University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Lora Giangregorio
- University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada.,Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, 150 Laurelwood Drive, Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 0E2, Canada
| | - Sharon Straus
- University of Toronto, 27 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A4, Canada
| | - Alexandra Papaioannou
- GERAS Centre for Aging Research, 88 Maplewood Avenue, Hamilton, Ontario, L8M 1W9, Canada.,Master University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Frandsen TF, Lindhardt CL, Eriksen MB. Performance of conceptual framework elements for the retrieval of qualitative health literature: a case study. J Med Libr Assoc 2021; 109:388-394. [PMID: 34629967 PMCID: PMC8485961 DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective A growing volume of studies address methods for performing systematic reviews of qualitative studies. One such methodological aspect is the conceptual framework used to structure the review question and plan the search strategy for locating relevant studies. The purpose of this case study was to evaluate the retrieval potential of each element of conceptual frameworks in qualitative systematic reviews in the health sciences. Methods The presence of elements from conceptual frameworks in publication titles, abstracts, and controlled vocabulary in CINAHL and PubMed was analyzed using a set of qualitative reviews and their included studies as a gold standard. Using a sample of 101 publications, we determined whether particular publications could be retrieved if a specific element from the conceptual framework was used in the search strategy. Results We found that the relative recall of conceptual framework elements varied considerably, with higher recall for patient/population (99%) and research type (97%) and lower recall for intervention/phenomenon of interest (74%), outcome (79%), and context (61%). Conclusion The use of patient/population and research type elements had high relative recall for qualitative studies. However, other elements should be used with great care due to lower relative recall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christina Louise Lindhardt
- , Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense Denmark. Department of Clinical Institute, University of Southern, Odense, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kuusisto-Gussmann E, Höckelmann C, von der Lühe V, Schmädig R, Baltes M, Stephan A. Patients' experiences of delirium: A systematic review and meta-summary of qualitative research. J Adv Nurs 2021; 77:3692-3706. [PMID: 33991125 DOI: 10.1111/jan.14865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The purpose of this systematic review and meta-summary was the aggregation of the empirical qualitative literature on patients' experiences of delirium in order to support the development and implementation of patient-oriented delirium management and to guide future research. DESIGN We conducted a systematic literature review of qualitative research published between January 1980 and June 2019. DATA SOURCES In June 2019, we searched in Medline, CINAHL, SSCI and PsycInfo to identify relevant reports. In addition, we conducted searches in three dissertation databases (BASE, DART and ProQuest) and Google Scholar. REVIEW METHODS We used methods developed by Sandelowski and Barroso to construct a meta-summary of the findings by extracting them from the reports, abstracting them into meta- findings and calculating their manifest interstudy frequency effect sizes. RESULTS Out of the 742 identified records, 24 reports based on delirium experience accounts of 483 patients met our criteria and were included. One thousand ninety-seven findings were extracted from these reports and abstracted into 92 meta-findings. These were grouped to the five emerging themes 'perception', 'emotions', 'interaction with others', 'dealing with delirium' and 'influence on further life'. CONCLUSION Delirium is commonly perceived as an overall distressing condition, which can accompany and influence patients even after hospital discharge. IMPACT This systematic review and meta-summary is the most comprehensive aggregation of qualitative research of the patient delirium experience to date. It allows us to better understand, extract meaning from, and weigh the qualitative findings in their context by calculating their manifest frequency effect sizes. This can be used to support the development and implementation of delirium management concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eero Kuusisto-Gussmann
- Institute for Health and Nursing Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Carolin Höckelmann
- Institute for Health and Nursing Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Verena von der Lühe
- Institute for Health and Nursing Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Roman Schmädig
- Institute for Health and Nursing Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Marion Baltes
- Institute for Health and Nursing Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.,Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Astrid Stephan
- Institute for Health and Nursing Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.,Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lang S, Gibson S, Ng KW, Truby H. Understanding children and young people's experiences pursuing weight loss maintenance using the Socio-ecological Model: A qualitative systematic literature review. Obes Rev 2021; 22:e13172. [PMID: 33331090 DOI: 10.1111/obr.13172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Developing a broader understanding of children and young people's experiences of long-term attempts of weight management may provide insight into both enablers and barriers to successful weight loss maintenance. This review aims to explore children and young people's perceptions of long-term attempts of weight management. Six databases were searched for qualitative studies describing young participants (<25 years, previously or currently above a healthy weight) experiences of weight management for >6 months following intentional weight loss. A thematic synthesis was undertaken. Themes were interpreted using the Socio-ecological Model. Factors supporting attempts to maintain weight loss included having clear motivation for change; developing personal skills to manage the challenges of change; family support/dynamics that encourage healthy lifestyles; and health-promoting cultures in schools/workplaces, communities, and the broader living environment. Conversely, ambivalence, difficulty coping with changes, peer pressure, challenging family dynamics, limited professional support, and unhealthy living environments were barriers to maintaining behavior change. These facilitators and barriers at each level of the Socio-ecological Model informed a model of weight loss maintenance for children and young people. Supporting children, young people, and families to develop the skills to manage the individual, social, and environmental challenges that shape attempts of long-term weight management will help to support their ability to manage their weight long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Lang
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | - Simone Gibson
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ker Wei Ng
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Truby
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pohontsch NJ, Meyer T, Eisenmann Y, Metzendorf MI, Leve V, Lentsch V. Study protocol of a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis using two different approaches: Healthcare related needs and desires of older people with post-stroke aphasia. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e039348. [PMID: 35175215 PMCID: PMC8039218 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stroke is a frequent disease in the older population of Western Europe with aphasia as a common consequence. Aphasia is known to impede targeting treatment to individual patients' needs and therefore may reduce treatment success. In Germany, the postacute care of patients who had stroke is provided by different healthcare institutions of different sectors (rehabilitation, nursing and primary care) with substantial difficulties to coordinate services. We will conduct two qualitative evidence syntheses (QESs) aiming at exploring distinct healthcare needs and desires of older people living with poststroke aphasia. We thereby hope to support the development of integrated care models based on needs of patients who are very restricted to communicate them. Since various methods of QESs exist, the aim of the study embedding the two QESs was to determine if findings differ according to the approach used. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will conduct two QESs by using metaethnography (ME) and thematic synthesis (ThS) independently to synthesise the findings of primary qualitative studies. The main differences between these two methods are the underlying epistemologies (idealism (ME) vs realism (ThS)) and the type of research question (emerging (ME) vs fixed (ThS)).We will search seven bibliographical databases. Inclusion criteria comprise: patients with poststroke aphasia, aged 65 years and older, studies in German/English, all types of qualitative studies concerning needs and desires related to healthcare or the healthcare system. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines and includes three items from the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the synthesis of Qualitative Research checklist. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented on national conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Janis Pohontsch
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Meyer
- School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Yvonne Eisenmann
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Maria-Inti Metzendorf
- Institute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Verena Leve
- Institute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Veronika Lentsch
- Berufsakademie Nord, University of Cooperative Education, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fernandez Piciochi C, Bimbela Pedrola JL, Sarria Santamera A, Martin Saborido C. Effective transdisciplinarity in diabetes care: PRECEDE Diagnosis. ENDOCRINOL DIAB NUTR 2021; 69:S2530-0164(21)00046-X. [PMID: 33750681 DOI: 10.1016/j.endinu.2020.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Antonio Sarria Santamera
- Nazarbayev University School of Medicine, Nur-sultán, Kazajistán; REDISSEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Carmona C, Baxter S, Carroll C. Systematic review of the methodological literature for integrating qualitative evidence syntheses into health guideline development. Res Synth Methods 2021; 12:491-505. [PMID: 33591605 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Revised: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Guidelines produced by local, national and international bodies underpin clinical practice and healthcare services worldwide. For guidelines to be based on the best available evidence, it is critical that syntheses of both qualitative and quantitative evidence are used to inform decision-making. As methods for qualitative evidence syntheses (QES) develop, they are increasingly able to inform health guideline production. However, the process whereby this form of evidence is considered and incorporated tends to be unclear. This systematic review synthesized existing guidance concerning the use of QES in guideline development. Sources published in English that described or prescribed methods for incorporating QES into evidence-based health guidelines were eligible for inclusion. Seventeen relevant papers were identified. The literature indicates that there is a reasonable consensus about many stages of conducting a QES to inform guideline development. Areas needing further exploration include: the way that committees engage with QES; the usefulness of different QES methodologies; and understanding of how expert committees use evidence. Methods for producing QES for guideline committees tend to be similar to quantitative systematic review methods in terms of searching, quality appraisal, systematic management of data, and presentation of results. While this allows transparency and accountability, it could be argued that it is less "true" to the principles of being led by the data, which are fundamental to most qualitative research. Understanding the process of using QES to produce guidelines is critical to determining their validity and applicability, and to ensure that healthcare provision is based on the best available evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Carmona
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Susan Baxter
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Christopher Carroll
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Leggett H, Scantlebury A, Sharma H, Hewitt C, Harden M, McDaid C. Quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e040378. [PMID: 33303449 PMCID: PMC7733194 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lower limb conditions requiring reconstructive surgery can be either congenital or acquired from trauma, infection or other medical conditions. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are often used by healthcare professionals to assess the impact of a patient's condition (and treatment) on quality of life. However, we are not aware of any measures developed specifically for people requiring lower limb reconstructive surgery. Consequently, it is not clear the extent to which current PROMs accurately and specifically measure the outcomes that are important to these patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The 'PROLLIT' (Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Lower Limb Reconstruction) involves three phases: to explore what is important to patients with regard to quality of life (phase 1), ascertain whether current measures adequately capture these experiences (phase 2) and if not begin, the development of a new PROM (phase 3). The population of interest is people requiring, undergoing or after undergoing reconstructive surgery for a lower limb condition. In this paper, we describe phase 1, which aims to develop a conceptual framework to identify and map what is important to this group with regard to social interactions, employment, perceived health and quality of life after condition onset/injury and throughout recovery. The conceptual framework will be developed through three steps: (step A) a qualitative evidence synthesis, (step B) a qualitative study with patients and staff to explore patient's views and experiences of lower limb reconstructive surgery and (step C) a round table discussion with key stakeholders where findings from step A and step B will be brought together and used to finalise the conceptual framework. ETHICS CONSIDERATION AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval has been granted for the qualitative data collection (step B) from South Central Berkshire Research Ethics committee (REF:20/SC/0114). Findings from steps A and B will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication in academic journals, and presented at academic conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019139587. ISRCTN REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN75201623.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hemant Sharma
- Trauma and Orthopedics, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK
| | | | - Melissa Harden
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), University of York, York, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Toledo-Chávarri A, Ramos-García V, Torres-Castaño A, Trujillo-Martín MM, Peñate Castro W, Del Cura-Castro I, Serrano-Aguilar P, Perestelo-Pérez L. Framing the process in the implementation of care for people with generalized anxiety disorder in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:237. [PMID: 33218311 PMCID: PMC7678131 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01307-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Background Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most common mental disorders in primary care (PC). GAD has low remission and high relapse rates over long follow-up periods. Qualitative evidence was synthesized to understand the implementation of care and treatment options for people with GAD in PC. Methods Research published from 2008 to September 2020 was searched in five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, WOS and PsycArticles). Studies that used qualitative methods for data collection and analysis to investigate the implementation of care and treatment options for people with GAD in PC and outpatient settings were included. Non-qualitative studies, mixed methods studies that did not separately report qualitative findings and studies in languages other than English or Spanish were excluded. We used the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (CERQual) framework to assess the overall confidence in the findings. Results The results with a moderate level of confidence showed that the trajectory of care for people with GAD in PC and outpatient settings is long and fluctuates over time, involving multiple difficulties in accessing and maintaining initial treatment or successive treatment options. In addition, there are wide variations in the preferences for and acceptability of different treatment options. The results with a high level of confidence indicated that more information on GAD and its treatment options is needed for PC practitioners, GAD patients and their carers. The results with a low level of confidence suggested that patients use antidepressants for longer than recommended and that the interruption of treatment is not usually planned. Conclusions Initial resistance to new treatments among people with GAD can make access and adherence to treatment difficult. Improving care may require patients to be informed of possible trajectories in stepped care pathways before the initiation of treatment so they are aware that they may need to try a number of options until the most effective treatment for them is found. Increased awareness of and information materials on GAD may facilitate both appropriate diagnosis and long-term care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-020-01307-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Toledo-Chávarri
- Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation, Tenerife, Spain.,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Center for Biomedical Research of the Canary Islands (CIBICAN), Tenerife, Spain.,The Spanish Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment and Services of the National Health System (RedETS), Tenerife, Spain
| | - Vanesa Ramos-García
- Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation, Tenerife, Spain. .,The Spanish Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment and Services of the National Health System (RedETS), Tenerife, Spain.
| | - Alezandra Torres-Castaño
- Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation, Tenerife, Spain.,The Spanish Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment and Services of the National Health System (RedETS), Tenerife, Spain
| | - María M Trujillo-Martín
- Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation, Tenerife, Spain.,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Center for Biomedical Research of the Canary Islands (CIBICAN), Tenerife, Spain.,The Spanish Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment and Services of the National Health System (RedETS), Tenerife, Spain
| | - Wenceslao Peñate Castro
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud - Sección de Psicología, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Isabel Del Cura-Castro
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Unidad de Apoyo a la Investigación, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Madrid, Spain.,Department Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Center for Biomedical Research of the Canary Islands (CIBICAN), Tenerife, Spain.,The Spanish Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment and Services of the National Health System (RedETS), Tenerife, Spain.,Evaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Islands Health Service (SCS), Tenerife, Spain
| | - Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Center for Biomedical Research of the Canary Islands (CIBICAN), Tenerife, Spain.,The Spanish Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment and Services of the National Health System (RedETS), Tenerife, Spain.,Evaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Islands Health Service (SCS), Tenerife, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Pollock A, Campbell P, Cheyne J, Cowie J, Davis B, McCallum J, McGill K, Elders A, Hagen S, McClurg D, Torrens C, Maxwell M. Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 11:CD013779. [PMID: 33150970 PMCID: PMC8226433 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 216] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence from disease epidemics shows that healthcare workers are at risk of developing short- and long-term mental health problems. The World Health Organization (WHO) has warned about the potential negative impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the mental well-being of health and social care professionals. Symptoms of mental health problems commonly include depression, anxiety, stress, and additional cognitive and social problems; these can impact on function in the workplace. The mental health and resilience (ability to cope with the negative effects of stress) of frontline health and social care professionals ('frontline workers' in this review) could be supported during disease epidemics by workplace interventions, interventions to support basic daily needs, psychological support interventions, pharmacological interventions, or a combination of any or all of these. OBJECTIVES Objective 1: to assess the effects of interventions aimed at supporting the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic. Objective 2: to identify barriers and facilitators that may impact on the implementation of interventions aimed at supporting the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic. SEARCH METHODS On 28 May 2020 we searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Global Index Medicus databases and WHO Institutional Repository for Information Sharing. We also searched ongoing trials registers and Google Scholar. We ran all searches from the year 2002 onwards, with no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies in which participants were health and social care professionals working at the front line during infectious disease outbreaks, categorised as epidemics or pandemics by WHO, from 2002 onwards. For objective 1 we included quantitative evidence from randomised trials, non-randomised trials, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series studies, which investigated the effect of any intervention to support mental health or resilience, compared to no intervention, standard care, placebo or attention control intervention, or other active interventions. For objective 2 we included qualitative evidence from studies that described barriers and facilitators to the implementation of interventions. Outcomes critical to this review were general mental health and resilience. Additional outcomes included psychological symptoms of anxiety, depression or stress; burnout; other mental health disorders; workplace staffing; and adverse events arising from interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Pairs of review authors independently applied selection criteria to abstracts and full papers, with disagreements resolved through discussion. One review author systematically extracted data, cross-checked by a second review author. For objective 1, we assessed risk of bias of studies of effectiveness using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. For objective 2, we assessed methodological limitations using either the CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) qualitative study tool, for qualitative studies, or WEIRD (Ways of Evaluating Important and Relevant Data) tool, for descriptive studies. We planned meta-analyses of pairwise comparisons for outcomes if direct evidence were available. Two review authors extracted evidence relating to barriers and facilitators to implementation, organised these around the domains of the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research, and used the GRADE-CERQual approach to assess confidence in each finding. We planned to produce an overarching synthesis, bringing quantitative and qualitative findings together. MAIN RESULTS We included 16 studies that reported implementation of an intervention aimed at supporting the resilience or mental health of frontline workers during disease outbreaks (severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): 2; Ebola: 9; Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS): 1; COVID-19: 4). Interventions studied included workplace interventions, such as training, structure and communication (6 studies); psychological support interventions, such as counselling and psychology services (8 studies); and multifaceted interventions (2 studies). Objective 1: a mixed-methods study that incorporated a cluster-randomised trial, investigating the effect of a work-based intervention, provided very low-certainty evidence about the effect of training frontline healthcare workers to deliver psychological first aid on a measure of burnout. Objective 2: we included all 16 studies in our qualitative evidence synthesis; we classified seven as qualitative and nine as descriptive studies. We identified 17 key findings from multiple barriers and facilitators reported in studies. We did not have high confidence in any of the findings; we had moderate confidence in six findings and low to very low confidence in 11 findings. We are moderately confident that the following two factors were barriers to intervention implementation: frontline workers, or the organisations in which they worked, not being fully aware of what they needed to support their mental well-being; and a lack of equipment, staff time or skills needed for an intervention. We are moderately confident that the following three factors were facilitators of intervention implementation: interventions that could be adapted for local needs; having effective communication, both formally and socially; and having positive, safe and supportive learning environments for frontline workers. We are moderately confident that the knowledge or beliefs, or both, that people have about an intervention can act as either barriers or facilitators to implementation of the intervention. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is a lack of both quantitative and qualitative evidence from studies carried out during or after disease epidemics and pandemics that can inform the selection of interventions that are beneficial to the resilience and mental health of frontline workers. Alternative sources of evidence (e.g. from other healthcare crises, and general evidence about interventions that support mental well-being) could therefore be used to inform decision making. When selecting interventions aimed at supporting frontline workers' mental health, organisational, social, personal, and psychological factors may all be important. Research to determine the effectiveness of interventions is a high priority. The COVID-19 pandemic provides unique opportunities for robust evaluation of interventions. Future studies must be developed with appropriately rigorous planning, including development, peer review and transparent reporting of research protocols, following guidance and standards for best practice, and with appropriate length of follow-up. Factors that may act as barriers and facilitators to implementation of interventions should be considered during the planning of future research and when selecting interventions to deliver within local settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Pollock
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Pauline Campbell
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Joshua Cheyne
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences (CCBS), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Julie Cowie
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Bridget Davis
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jacqueline McCallum
- Department of Nursing and Community Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Kris McGill
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Claire Torrens
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Glasgow, UK
| | - Margaret Maxwell
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Houghton C, Dowling M, Meskell P, Hunter A, Gardner H, Conway A, Treweek S, Sutcliffe K, Noyes J, Devane D, Nicholas JR, Biesty LM. Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 10:MR000045. [PMID: 33026107 PMCID: PMC8078544 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.mr000045.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomised trials (also referred to as 'randomised controlled trials' or 'trials') are the optimal way to minimise bias in evaluating the effects of competing treatments, therapies and innovations in health care. It is important to achieve the required sample size for a trial, otherwise trialists may not be able to draw conclusive results leading to research waste and raising ethical questions about trial participation. The reasons why potential participants may accept or decline participation are multifaceted. Yet, the evidence of effectiveness of interventions to improve recruitment to trials is not substantial and fails to recognise these individual decision-making processes. It is important to synthesise the experiences and perceptions of those invited to participate in randomised trials to better inform recruitment strategies. OBJECTIVES To explore potential trial participants' views and experiences of the recruitment process for participation. The specific objectives are to describe potential participants' perceptions and experiences of accepting or declining to participate in trials, to explore barriers and facilitators to trial participation, and to explore to what extent barriers and facilitators identified are addressed by strategies to improve recruitment evaluated in previous reviews of the effects of interventions including a Cochrane Methodology Review. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Epistemonikos, LILACS, PsycINFO, ORRCA, and grey literature sources. We ran the most recent set of searches for which the results were incorporated into the review in July 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA We included qualitative and mixed-methods studies (with an identifiable qualitative component) that explored potential trial participants' experiences and perceptions of being invited to participate in a trial. We excluded studies that focused only on recruiters' perspectives, and trials solely involving children under 18 years, or adults who were assessed as having impaired mental capacity. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Five review authors independently assessed the titles, abstracts and full texts identified by the search. We used the CART (completeness, accuracy, relevance, timeliness) criteria to exclude studies that had limited focus on the phenomenon of interest. We used QSR NVivo to extract and manage the data. We assessed methodological limitations using the Critical Skills Appraisal Programme (CASP) tool. We used thematic synthesis to analyse and synthesise the evidence. This provided analytical themes and a conceptual model. We used the GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach to assess our confidence in each finding. Our findings were integrated with two previous intervention effectiveness reviews by juxtaposing the quantitative and qualitative findings in a matrix. MAIN RESULTS We included 29 studies (published in 30 papers) in our synthesis. Twenty-two key findings were produced under three broad themes (with six subthemes) to capture the experience of being invited to participate in a trial and making the decision whether to participate. Most of these findings had moderate to high confidence. We identified factors from the trial itself that influenced participation. These included how trial information was communicated, and elements of the trial such as the time commitment that might be considered burdensome. The second theme related to personal factors such as how other people can influence the individual's decision; and how a personal understanding of potential harms and benefits could impact on the decision. Finally, the potential benefits of participation were found to be key to the decision to participate, namely personal benefits such as access to new treatments, but also the chance to make a difference and help others. The conceptual model we developed presents the decision-making process as a gauge and the factors that influence whether the person will, or will not, take part. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This qualitative evidence synthesis has provided comprehensive insight into the complexity of factors that influence a person's decision whether to participate in a trial. We developed key questions that trialists can ask when developing their recruitment strategy. In addition, our conceptual model emphasises the need for participant-centred approaches to recruitment. We demonstrated moderate to high level confidence in our findings, which in some way can be attributed to the large volume of highly relevant studies in this field. We recommend that these insights be used to direct or influence or underpin future recruitment strategies that are developed in a participant-driven way that ultimately improves trial conduct and reduces research waste.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Houghton
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Maura Dowling
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Pauline Meskell
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Andrew Hunter
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Heidi Gardner
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Aislinn Conway
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Katy Sutcliffe
- Department of Social Science, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, London, UK
| | - Jane Noyes
- Centre for Health-Related Research, Fron Heulog, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Declan Devane
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Jane R Nicholas
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Linda M Biesty
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
McCashin D, Coyle D, O'Reilly G. A qualitative evaluation of Pesky gNATs in primary care - The experiences of assistant psychologists providing computer-assisted CBT to children experiencing low mood and anxiety. Internet Interv 2020; 22:100348. [PMID: 32904717 PMCID: PMC7458094 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2020.100348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 08/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Technology-assisted cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is recognized as an evidence-based and cost-effective way to address psychological difficulties in children. Increasingly, these interventions are provided by staff with different levels of psychological training, such as assistant psychologists (APs). However, there is limited qualitative understanding regarding their experiences of providing technology-assisted CBT. METHOD Semi-structured interviews were conducted with APs (n = 14) in primary care settings in Ireland. This qualitative evaluation is part of an ongoing RCT for the CBT game Pesky gNATs (O'Reilly and Coyle, 2015). All data were inductively analysed using qualitative thematic analysis by Braun and Clarke (2006). RESULTS Five overarching themes were identified: 1) positive experiences, 2) integrating Pesky gNATs with traditional CBT, 3) managing parental 'buy-in', 4) implementation complexities, and 5) future perspectives. Two subthemes were reported for each overarching theme: benefits for children, AP professional growth, facilitating engagement, different child characteristics, unclear role for parents, child autonomy, managing waitlists, external factors, design considerations and advice to future APs. CONCLUSIONS Pesky gNATs is well-received by APs in primary care, and is mostly experienced as helpful by both APs and children. However, a number of factors may be impacting the ability of APs to effectively provide the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darragh McCashin
- University College Dublin, School of Psychology, Dublin, Ireland
- Corresponding author.
| | - David Coyle
- University College Dublin, School of Computer Science, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gary O'Reilly
- University College Dublin, School of Psychology, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Long HA, French DP, Brooks JM. Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/2632084320947559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The value of qualitative evidence synthesis for informing healthcare policy and practice within evidence-based medicine is increasingly recognised. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding how to judge the methodological quality of qualitative studies being synthesised and debates around the extent to which such assessment is possible and appropriate. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool is the most commonly used tool for quality appraisal in health-related qualitative evidence syntheses, with endorsement from the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group. The tool is recommended for novice qualitative researchers, but there is little existing guidance on its application. This article considers issues related to the suitability and usability of the CASP tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis in order to support and improve future appraisal exercises framed by the tool. We reflect on our practical experience of using the tool in a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis. We discuss why it is worth considering a study’s underlying theoretical, ontological and epistemological framework and how this could be incorporated into the tool by way of a novel question. We consider how particular features of the tool may impact its interpretation, the appraisal results and the subsequent synthesis. We discuss how to use quality appraisal results to inform the next stages of evidence synthesis and present a novel approach to organising the synthesis, whereby studies deemed to be of higher quality contribute relatively more to the synthesis. We propose tool modifications, user guidance, and areas for future methodological research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah A Long
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - David P French
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Joanna M Brooks
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bastos PDO, Cavalcante ASP, Pereira WMG, de Castro VHS, Ferreira Júnior AR, Guerra PH, da Silva KS, da Silva MRF, Barbosa Filho VC. Health Promoting School Interventions in Latin America: A Systematic Review Protocol on the Dimensions of the RE-AIM Framework. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E5558. [PMID: 32752119 PMCID: PMC7432100 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17155558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Understanding the dimensions of internal and external validities (e.g., using the RE-AIM model: Reach, Effectiveness/Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) of school interventions is important to guide research and practice in this context. The aim of this systematic review protocol is to synthesize evidence on the RE-AIM dimensions in interventions based on the Health Promoting School (HPS) approach from the World Health Organization (WHO) in Latin America. Studies of interventions based on HPS-WHO that were carried out in Latin America involving the population of 5 to 18-year-olds will be eligible. Searches in nine electronic databases, a study repository, the gray literature, and the retrieved articles' reference lists will be performed, without year or publication language limits. Study selection and data extraction will be conducted by independent researchers. Data on intervention implementation will be summarized in categories of HPS-WHO actions: (1) school curriculum, (2) changes in the social and/or physical environment of schools, and (3) actions with families and the community. A previously validated tool will be used to summarize the information on the dimensions of the RE-AIM model. The strengths and limitations of the included studies will be evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) tool, and the confidence level of evidence will be assessed according to the GRADE CERQual tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrícia de Oliveira Bastos
- Post-graduate Program in Collective Health, Ceara State University, Fortaleza 60714-903, Brazil; (P.d.O.B.); (A.S.P.C.); (W.M.G.P.); (V.H.S.d.C.); (A.R.F.J.); (M.R.F.d.S.)
| | - Ana Suelen Pedroza Cavalcante
- Post-graduate Program in Collective Health, Ceara State University, Fortaleza 60714-903, Brazil; (P.d.O.B.); (A.S.P.C.); (W.M.G.P.); (V.H.S.d.C.); (A.R.F.J.); (M.R.F.d.S.)
| | - Wallingson Michael Gonçalves Pereira
- Post-graduate Program in Collective Health, Ceara State University, Fortaleza 60714-903, Brazil; (P.d.O.B.); (A.S.P.C.); (W.M.G.P.); (V.H.S.d.C.); (A.R.F.J.); (M.R.F.d.S.)
| | - Victor Hugo Santos de Castro
- Post-graduate Program in Collective Health, Ceara State University, Fortaleza 60714-903, Brazil; (P.d.O.B.); (A.S.P.C.); (W.M.G.P.); (V.H.S.d.C.); (A.R.F.J.); (M.R.F.d.S.)
| | - Antonio Rodrigues Ferreira Júnior
- Post-graduate Program in Collective Health, Ceara State University, Fortaleza 60714-903, Brazil; (P.d.O.B.); (A.S.P.C.); (W.M.G.P.); (V.H.S.d.C.); (A.R.F.J.); (M.R.F.d.S.)
| | | | - Kelly Samara da Silva
- Research Center for Physical Activity and Health, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis 88040-900, Brazil;
| | - Maria Rocineide Ferreira da Silva
- Post-graduate Program in Collective Health, Ceara State University, Fortaleza 60714-903, Brazil; (P.d.O.B.); (A.S.P.C.); (W.M.G.P.); (V.H.S.d.C.); (A.R.F.J.); (M.R.F.d.S.)
| | - Valter Cordeiro Barbosa Filho
- Post-graduate Program in Collective Health, Ceara State University, Fortaleza 60714-903, Brazil; (P.d.O.B.); (A.S.P.C.); (W.M.G.P.); (V.H.S.d.C.); (A.R.F.J.); (M.R.F.d.S.)
- Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Ceara, Aracati 62800-000, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Goodall G, Taraldsen K, Serrano JA. The use of technology in creating individualized, meaningful activities for people living with dementia: A systematic review. DEMENTIA 2020; 20:1442-1469. [PMID: 32475166 PMCID: PMC8132010 DOI: 10.1177/1471301220928168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
There is a growing interest in using technology to provide meaningful activities for people living with dementia. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and explore the different types of digital technologies used in creating individualized, meaningful activities for people living with dementia. From 1414 articles identified from searches in four databases, 29 articles were included in the review. The inclusion criteria were the study used digital technology to deliver an individually tailored activity to participants with dementia, the process of individualization was described, and findings relating to the mental, physical, social, and/or emotional well-being of the participant were reported. Data extracted from the included studies included participant demographics, aims, methods, and outcomes. The following information on the technology was also extracted: purpose, type, training, facilitation, and the individualization process. A narrative synthesis of the results grouped the various technologies into four main purposes: reminiscence/memory support, behavior management, stimulating engagement, and conversation/communication support. A broad range of technologies were studied, with varying methods of evaluation implemented to assess their effect. Overall, the use of technology in creating individualized, meaningful activities seems to be promising in terms of improving behavior and promoting relationships with others. Furthermore, most studies in this review involved the person with dementia in the individualization process of the technology, indicating that research in this area is adopting a more co-creative and inclusive approach. However, sample sizes of the included studies were small, and there was a lack of standardized outcome measures. Future studies should aim to build a more concrete evidence base by improving the methodological quality of research in this area. Findings from the review indicate that there is also a need for more evidence concerning the feasibility of implementing these technologies into care environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - J Artur Serrano
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Norwegian Centre for eHealth Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bhaumik S, Hunter K, Matzopoulos R, Prinsloo M, Ivers RQ, Peden M. Facilitators and barriers to child restraint use in motor vehicles: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Inj Prev 2020; 26:478-493. [PMID: 32447304 DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2020-043655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Road traffic collisions contribute a significant burden of mortality and morbidity to children globally. The improper or non-use of child restraints can result in children sustaining significant injuries in the event of a collision. Systematic reviews on the effectiveness of various interventions to increase the use of child restraints already exist but to the best of our knowledge, there has been no qualitative evidence syntheses on the facilitators and barriers to child restraint usage. This review aims to fill that gap. METHODS We searched for qualitative studies, which focused on perceptions, values and experiences of children, parents/caregivers or any other relevant stakeholders on the use of restraints for children travelling in motor vehicles in PubMed, EMBASE and Global Health and screened reference lists of all included studies. We assessed the quality of included studies with the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist and used the PROGRESS Plus lens for an equity focused analysis. RESULTS We identified a total of 335 records from searching the databases and five records from other sources. After screening, we identified 17 studies that met our inclusion criteria. All but one study (which had children as participants) focused on the perceptions, attitudes and barriers of parents or caregivers. The included studies were from three high-income (n=14) and one upper-middle income (n=3) country. In addition, although many focused exclusively on participants from culturally and linguistically diverse minorities, the issue of equity was not well addressed. Five major themes emerged from the analysis. (1) perceived risk for injuries and perceived safety benefits of child restraint usage varies in different settings and between different types of caregivers; (2) practical issues around the use of child restraints is a major barrier to its uptake as a child safety measure; (3) restraint use is considered as a mechanism to discipline children rather than as a safety device by parents and as children became older they actively seek opportunities to negotiate the non-usage of restraints; (4) adoption and enforcement of laws shape perceptions and usage in all settings and (5) perceptions and norms of child safety differ among culturally and linguistically diverse groups. CONCLUSION The results of this systematic review should be considered when designing interventions to promote the uptake of child restraints. However, there is a need to conduct qualitative research around the facilitators and barriers to child restraint usage in low-income and middle-income countries. Furthermore, there is a need for more evidence conducted in semiurban and rural areas and to involve fathers, policy-makers, implementers and enforcement agencies in such studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kate Hunter
- Injury Division, George Institute for Global Health, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard Matzopoulos
- School of Public Health & Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
| | - Megan Prinsloo
- Burden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, South Africa
| | - Rebecca Q Ivers
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Ivers, George Institute for Global Health, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Margaret Peden
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia .,George Institute for Global Health UK, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.,Nuffield Department of Womens and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Cancelliere C, Wong JJ, Yu H, Nordin M, Mior S, Pereira P, Brunton G, Shearer H, Connell G, Verville L, Taylor-Vaisey A, Côté P. Postsurgical rehabilitation for adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy who were treated surgically: protocol for a mixed studies systematic review. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036817. [PMID: 32229527 PMCID: PMC7170616 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgical rates for low back pain (LBP) have been increasing in Europe, North America and Asia. Many patients treated surgically will require postsurgical rehabilitation. Little is known about the effectiveness of postsurgical rehabilitation interventions on health outcomes or about patients' experiences with these interventions. OBJECTIVES To conduct a mixed studies systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies regarding: (1) the effectiveness and safety of postsurgical rehabilitation interventions for adults with LBP treated surgically and (2) the experiences of patients, healthcare providers, caregivers or others involved with the rehabilitation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will search MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, the Index to Chiropractic Literature, the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials and the Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine Source for peer-reviewed empirical studies published from inception in any language. Studies using quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies will be included. We will also search reference lists of all eligible articles. Data extraction will include type of presurgical pathology, indication for surgery, surgical procedure, how the intervention was delivered and by whom, context and setting. We will conduct a quality assessment of each study and consider study quality in our evidence synthesis. We will use a sequential approach at the review level to synthesise and integrate data. First, we will synthesise the quantitative and qualitative studies independently, conducting a meta-analysis of the quantitative studies if appropriate and thematic synthesis of the qualitative studies. Then, we will integrate the quantitative and qualitative evidence by juxtaposing the findings in a matrix. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not required for this knowledge synthesis. Findings will be disseminated through knowledge translation activities including: (1) presentations at national and international conferences and scientific meetings; (2) presentations to local and international stakeholders; (3) publications in peer-reviewed journals and (4) posts on organisational websites. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019134607.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol Cancelliere
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jessica J Wong
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
- Epidemiology Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hainan Yu
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Margareta Nordin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Environmental Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Silvano Mior
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
- Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paulo Pereira
- Spine Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ginny Brunton
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
- EPPI-Centre, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK
| | - Heather Shearer
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gaelan Connell
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Leslie Verville
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anne Taylor-Vaisey
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pierre Côté
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Niño de Guzmán E, Martínez García L, González AI, Heijmans M, Huaringa J, Immonen K, Ninov L, Orrego-Villagrán C, Pérez-Bracchiglione J, Salas-Gama K, Viteri-García A, Alonso-Coello P. The perspectives of patients and their caregivers on self-management interventions for chronic conditions: a protocol for a mixed-methods overview. F1000Res 2020; 9:120. [PMID: 35186277 PMCID: PMC8825946 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.22125.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Self-management (SM) interventions are complex interventions and one of the main components of high-quality chronic disease care for which the incorporation of the perspectives of patients and their informal caregivers is crucial. We aim to identify, appraise and synthesise the evidence exploring patients' and caregivers' perspectives on SM interventions. More precisely, we aim to 1) describe how they value the importance of outcomes of SM interventions, and 2) identify the factors that might impact on acceptability and feasibility of SM interventions based on their preferences and experiences. Methods and analysis: We will conduct four mixed-methods overviews as part of COMPAR-EU, a European Union (EU) funded project aimed to identify the most effective and cost-effective SM interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure (HF), obesity, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We will search in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for systematic reviews of studies addressing patients' preferences on outcomes, or their experiences with SM alongside their disease trajectory or with SM interventions, published in English. Selection of studies and data extraction will be conducted in pairs. We will assess the overlap of studies and methodological quality. We will follow a three-step synthesis process: 1) narrative synthesis for quantitative evidence, 2) thematic synthesis for qualitative evidence, and 3) integration of findings in the interpretation phase. Additionally, we will consult on the relevance of findings with patients and their caregivers. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42019117867.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ena Niño de Guzmán
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, 08025, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Martínez García
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, 08025, Spain
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana I. González
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, 08037, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Monique Heijmans
- Netherlands institute for health services research (Nivel), Utrecht, 3513, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Carola Orrego-Villagrán
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, 08037, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Pérez-Bracchiglione
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Studies (CIESAL), Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, 2520000, Chile
| | | | - Andrés Viteri-García
- Universidad UTE, Quito, 170527, Ecuador
- Cochrane Ecuador, Centro de Investigación en Salud Pública y Epidemiología Clínica (CISPEC), Quito, 170527, Ecuador
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, 08025, Spain
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Niño de Guzmán E, Martínez García L, González AI, Heijmans M, Huaringa J, Immonen K, Ninov L, Orrego-Villagrán C, Pérez-Bracchiglione J, Salas-Gama K, Viteri-García A, Alonso-Coello P. The perspectives of patients and their caregivers on self-management interventions for chronic conditions: a protocol for a mixed-methods overview. F1000Res 2020; 9:120. [PMID: 35186277 PMCID: PMC8825946 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.22125.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 08/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Self-management (SM) interventions are complex interventions and one of the main components of high-quality chronic disease care for which the incorporation of the perspectives of patients and their informal caregivers is crucial. We aim to identify, appraise and synthesise the evidence exploring patients' and caregivers' perspectives on SM interventions. More precisely, we aim to 1) describe how they value the importance of outcomes of SM interventions, and 2) identify the factors that might impact on acceptability and feasibility of SM interventions based on their preferences and experiences. Methods and analysis: We will conduct four mixed-methods overviews as part of COMPAR-EU, a European Union (EU) funded project aimed to identify the most effective and cost-effective SM interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure (HF), obesity, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We will search in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for systematic reviews of studies addressing patients' preferences on outcomes, or their experiences with SM alongside their disease trajectory or with SM interventions, published in English. Selection of studies and data extraction will be conducted in pairs. We will assess the overlap of studies and methodological quality. We will follow a three-step synthesis process: 1) narrative synthesis for quantitative evidence, 2) thematic synthesis for qualitative evidence, and 3) integration of findings in the interpretation phase. Additionally, we will consult on the relevance of findings with patients and their caregivers. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42019117867.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ena Niño de Guzmán
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, 08025, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Martínez García
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, 08025, Spain
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana I. González
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, 08037, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Monique Heijmans
- Netherlands institute for health services research (Nivel), Utrecht, 3513, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Carola Orrego-Villagrán
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, 08037, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Pérez-Bracchiglione
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Studies (CIESAL), Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, 2520000, Chile
| | | | - Andrés Viteri-García
- Universidad UTE, Quito, 170527, Ecuador
- Cochrane Ecuador, Centro de Investigación en Salud Pública y Epidemiología Clínica (CISPEC), Quito, 170527, Ecuador
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, 08025, Spain
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Allan S, Mcleod H, Bradstreet S, Beedie S, Moir B, Gleeson J, Farhall J, Morton E, Gumley A. Understanding Implementation of a Digital Self-Monitoring Intervention for Relapse Prevention in Psychosis: Protocol for a Mixed Method Process Evaluation. JMIR Res Protoc 2019; 8:e15634. [PMID: 31821154 PMCID: PMC6930509 DOI: 10.2196/15634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Relapse is common in people who experience psychosis and is associated with many negative consequences, both societal and personal. People who relapse often exhibit changes (early warning signs [EWS]) in the period before relapse. Successful identification of EWS offers an opportunity for relapse prevention. However, several known barriers impede the use of EWS monitoring approaches. Early signs Monitoring to Prevent relapse in psychosis and prOmote Well-being, Engagement, and Recovery (EMPOWER) is a complex digital intervention that uses a mobile app to enhance the detection and management of self-reported changes in well-being. This is currently being tested in a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial. As digital interventions have not been widely used in relapse prevention, little is known about their implementation. Process evaluation studies run in parallel to clinical trials can provide valuable data on intervention feasibility. Objective This study aims to transparently describe the protocol for the process evaluation element of the EMPOWER trial. We will focus on the development of a process evaluation framework sensitive to the worldview of service users, mental health staff, and carers; the aims of the process evaluation itself; the proposed studies to address these aims; and a plan for integration of results from separate process evaluation studies into one overall report. Methods The overall process evaluation will utilize mixed methods across 6 substudies. Among them, 4 will use qualitative methodologies, 1 will use a mixed methods approach, and 1 will use quantitative methodologies. Results The results of all studies will be triangulated into an overall analysis and interpretation of key implementation lessons. EMPOWER was funded in 2016, recruitment finished in January 2018. Data analysis is currently under way and the first results are expected to be submitted for publication in December 2019. Conclusions The findings from this study will help identify implementation facilitators and barriers to EMPOWER. These insights will inform both upscaling decisions and optimization of a definitive trial. Trial Registration ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN99559262; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN99559262 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/15634
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Allan
- Mental Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Hamish Mcleod
- Mental Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Bradstreet
- Mental Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Sara Beedie
- Mental Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Bethany Moir
- Mental Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - John Gleeson
- School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - John Farhall
- Department of Psychology and Counselling, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Emma Morton
- School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Andrew Gumley
- Mental Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Solà I, Trujols J, Ribalta E, Alcaraz S, Robleda G, Selva Olid C, Pérez de los Cobos J. Quality of life and well-being from the perspective of patients on opioid agonist maintenance treatment: study protocol for a systematic review of qualitative research and a scoping review of measures. Syst Rev 2019; 8:299. [PMID: 31787102 PMCID: PMC6886222 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-1237-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 11/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid agonist maintenance treatment (OAMT) is a first-line treatment for heroin dependence, but its effectiveness has been assessed primarily through clinical outcomes with a limited attention to patient perspectives. Despite the increased use of patient reported outcome measures their patient-centeredness is highly questionable. This is the protocol of a systematic review of qualitative research on how OAMT users construct the meaning of their quality of life and well-being and a scoping review of instruments that measure these domains. METHODS We will conduct a systematic review of qualitative research exploring the views of quality of life of patients on OAMT (registration number CRD42018086490). According pre-specified eligibility criteria, we will include studies from a comprehensive search of bibliographical databases from their inception. We will extract data from included studies and assess their risk of bias with the CASP appraisal criteria, and will implement a thematic analysis to generate a set of interpretative analytical themes ascertaining their confidence using the CERQual approach. We will implement similar methods to conduct a scoping review to assess to what extent the existing measures of these domains were focused on user's views, assessing their validity using the COSMIN methodology, and summarizing their characteristics and level of patient centeredness. CONCLUSION The findings from the reviews will contribute to obtain a genuine understanding of the perspective from users on OAMT regarding their perception of well-being and quality of life and will likely lead to greater patient centeredness when assessing such variables, which in turn may contribute to a more patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Solà
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Joan Trujols
- Addictive Behaviours Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Center on Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Barcelona, Spain
- Addictive Behaviors Research Group, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elisa Ribalta
- Addictive Behaviours Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Saul Alcaraz
- Addictive Behaviours Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Robleda
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- Escuela Superior de Enfermería Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut, UPF, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Clara Selva Olid
- PETRO Research Group, Bellaterra, Spain
- Department of Social Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Spain
| | - José Pérez de los Cobos
- Addictive Behaviours Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Center on Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Barcelona, Spain
- Addictive Behaviors Research Group, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Bellaterra, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
A qualitative research synthesis of contextual factors contributing to female overweight and obesity over the life course in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0224612. [PMID: 31682622 PMCID: PMC6827897 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Adult women are disproportionately affected by overweight and obesity in Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. Existing evidence on the sociocultural context remains unconsolidated. In this qualitative research synthesis, we aggregate research literature on contextual factors that potentially predispose adult women and adolescent girls to overweight and obesity to inform research, policies and programs over the life course. Methods PubMed, CINAHL, PsychInfo, ProQuest Central, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched to locate qualitative research articles conducted in SSA countries beginning in the year 2000. After assessment for eligibility and critical appraisal, 17 studies were included in the synthesis. Textual data and quotes were synthesized using meta-aggregation methods proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results The synthesized studies were conducted in South Africa, Ghana, Kenya and Botswana. The three overarching themes across these studies were body size and shape ideals, barriers to healthy eating, and barriers to physical activity, with cultural and social factors as cross-cutting influences within the major themes. Culturally, the supposedly ideal African woman was expected to be overweight or obese, and voluptuous, and this was associated with their identity. Although being overweight or obese was not acceptable to adolescent girls, they desired to be voluptuous. Healthy food choices among women and adolescent girls were hampered by several factors including affordability of nutritious foods and peer victimization. Both adult women and adolescent girls experienced ageism as a barrier to physical activity. Significance This is the first qualitative research synthesis to amplify the voices of women and girls in SSA countries highlighting the challenges they face in maintaining a healthy body weight. Sociocultural, institutional and peer-related factors were powerful forces shaping body size preferences, food choices and participation in physical activity. Our study findings provide insights for the design of contextually appropriate obesity prevention interventions and lay the foundation for further research studies.
Collapse
|