Value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress perfusion testing for the detection of coronary artery disease in women

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

The clinical utility of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in stable chest pain is still debated, and the low-risk period for adverse cardiovascular (CV) events after a negative test result is unknown.

Objective

To provide contemporary quantitative data synthesis of the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of stress CMR in stable chest pain.

Data Sources

PubMed and Embase databases, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were searched for potentially relevant articles from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2021.

Study Selection

Selected studies evaluated CMR and reported estimates of diagnostic accuracy and/or raw data of adverse CV events for participants with either positive or negative stress CMR results. Prespecified combinations of keywords related to the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of stress CMR were used. A total of 3144 records were evaluated for title and abstract; of those, 235 articles were included in the full-text assessment of eligibility. After exclusions, 64 studies (74 470 total patients) published from October 29, 2002, through October 19, 2021, were included.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Diagnostic odds ratios (DORs), sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), odds ratio (OR), and annualized event rate (AER) for all-cause death, CV death, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) defined as the composite of myocardial infarction and CV death.

Results

A total of 33 diagnostic studies pooling 7814 individuals and 31 prognostic studies pooling 67 080 individuals (mean [SD] follow-up, 3.5 [2.1] years; range, 0.9-8.8 years; 381 357 person-years) were identified. Stress CMR yielded a DOR of 26.4 (95% CI, 10.6-65.9), a sensitivity of 81% (95% CI, 68%-89%), a specificity of 86% (95% CI, 75%-93%), and an AUROC of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.89) for the detection of functionally obstructive coronary artery disease. In the subgroup analysis, stress CMR yielded higher diagnostic accuracy in the setting of suspected coronary artery disease (DOR, 53.4; 95% CI, 27.7-103.0) or when using 3-T imaging (DOR, 33.2; 95% CI, 19.9-55.4). The presence of stress-inducible ischemia was associated with higher all-cause mortality (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.69-2.31), CV mortality (OR, 6.40; 95% CI, 4.48-9.14), and MACEs (OR, 5.33; 95% CI, 4.04-7.04). The presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was associated with higher all-cause mortality (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.99-2.47), CV mortality (OR, 6.03; 95% CI, 2.76-13.13), and increased risk of MACEs (OR, 5.42; 95% CI, 3.42-8.60). After a negative test result, pooled AERs for CV death were less than 1.0%.

Conclusion and Relevance

In this study, stress CMR yielded high diagnostic accuracy and delivered robust prognostication, particularly when 3-T scanners were used. While inducible myocardial ischemia and LGE were associated with higher mortality and risk of MACEs, normal stress CMR results were associated with a lower risk of MACEs for at least 3.5 years.

Multimodality Imaging in the Detection of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women

Women with coronary artery disease tend to have a worse short and long-term prognosis relative to men and the incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is increasing. Women are less likely to present with classic anginal symptoms when compared with men and more likely to be misdiagnosed. Several non-invasive imaging modalities are available for diagnosing ischemic heart disease in women and many of these modalities can also assist with prognostication and help to guide management. Selection of the optimal imaging modality to evaluate women with possible ischemic heart disease is a scenario which clinicians often encounter. Earlier modalities such as exercise treadmill testing demonstrate significant performance variation in men and women, while newer modalities such as coronary CT angiography, myocardial perfusion imaging and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are highly specific and sensitive for the detection of ischemia and coronary artery disease with greater parity between sexes. Individual factors, availability, diagnostic performance, and female-specific considerations such as pregnancy status may influence the decision to select one modality over another. Emerging techniques such as strain rate imaging, CT-myocardial perfusion imaging and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging present additional options for diagnosing ischemia and coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Multi-centre study of whole-heart dynamic 3D cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve: gender based analysis of diagnostic performance

Aims

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in women and non-invasive testing for CAD in women can be more challenging than in men. This study compared the diagnostic performance of whole-heart dynamic 3D cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) stress perfusion imaging in female and male patients with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) as reference tests.

Methods and results

Four hundred sixteen patients with suspected or known CAD were enrolled in five European centres. CMR imaging was performed prior to clinically indicated coronary angiography. QCA was performed in all patients and FFR in 357 of 416 patients. Whole-heart dynamic 3D CMR first-pass perfusion imaging was conducted at rest and during adenosine stress. All CMR analyses were operated by experienced investigators blinded to all clinical data. One hundred nineteen female and 297 male patients were included and successfully examined (mean age 65 ± 11 and 63 ± 11 years, respectively). FFR was performed in 106 female and 251 male patients. Sensitivity and specificity of whole-heart dynamic 3D CMR stress perfusion imaging were 89% (95% CI: 77-96) and 82% (95% CI: 70-90) in the female population and 83% (95% CI: 77-86) and 79% (95% CI: 71-86) in the male population relative to QCA (P = 0.474 and P = 0.83, P-values for comparison between genders). Sensitivity and specificity were 95% (95% CI: 82-99) and 84% (95% CI: 73-92) in the female population and 83% (95% CI: 76-89) and 82% (95% CI: 74-88) in the male population when using FFR as the reference (P = 0.134 and P = 0.936, P-values for comparison between genders). Diagnostic accuracy in females was 92% (95% CI: 85-96) and 86% (95% CI: 81-90) in males when using FFR as the reference. The prevalence of CAD as defined by FFR (<0.8) was 36% in females and 53% in males.

Conclusion

Whole-heart dynamic 3D CMR stress perfusion imaging has a high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of significant CAD irrespective of gender and is therefore a suitable non-invasive testing tool to detect myocardial ischaemia in both genders.

Technical aspects of cardiac PET/MRI

PET/MRI is a novel modality that enables to combine PET and MR images, and has significant potential to evaluate various cardiac diseases through the combination of PET molecular imaging and MRI functional imaging. Precise management of technical issues, however, is necessary for cardiac PET/MRI. This article describes several technical points, including patient preparation, MR attenuation correction, parallel acquisition of PET with MRI, clinical aspects, and image quality control.

Measurement of myocardial native T1 in cardiovascular diseases and norm in 1291 subjects

BACKGROUND

Native T1-mapping provides quantitative myocardial tissue characterization for cardiovascular diseases (CVD), without the need for gadolinium. However, its translation into clinical practice is hindered by differences between techniques and the lack of established reference values. We provide typical myocardial T1-ranges for 18 commonly encountered CVDs using a single T1-mapping technique - Shortened Look-Locker Inversion Recovery (ShMOLLI), also used in the large UK Biobank and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Registry study.

METHODS

We analyzed 1291 subjects who underwent CMR (1.5-Tesla, MAGNETOM-Avanto, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) between 2009 and 2016, who had a single CVD diagnosis, with mid-ventricular T1-map assessment. A region of interest (ROI) was placed on native T1-maps in the "most-affected myocardium", characterized by the presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), or regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) on cines. Another ROI was placed in the "reference myocardium" as far as possible from LGE/RWMA, and in the septum if no focal abnormality was present. To further define normality, we included native T1 of healthy subjects from an existing dataset after sub-endocardial pixel-erosions.

RESULTS

Native T1 of patients with normal CMR (938 ± 21 ms) was similar compared to healthy subjects (941 ± 23 ms). Across all patient groups (57 ± 19 yrs., 65% males), focally affected myocardium had significantly different T1 value compared to reference myocardium (all p < 0.001). In the affected myocardium, cardiac amyloidosis (1119 ± 61 ms) had the highest native T1 compared to normal and all other CVDs, while iron-overload (795 ± 58 ms) and Anderson-Fabry disease (863 ± 23 ms) had the lowest native reference T1 (all p < 0.001). Future studies designed to detect the large T1 differences between affected and reference myocardium are estimated to require small sample-sizes (n < 50). However, studies designed to detect the small T1 differences between reference myocardium in CVDs and healthy controls can require several thousand of subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide typical T1-ranges for common clinical cardiac conditions in the largest cohort to-date, using ShMOLLI T1-mapping at 1.5 T. Sample-size calculations from this study may be useful for the design of future studies and trials that use T1-mapping as an endpoint.

Fractal analysis of the ischemic transition region in chronic ischemic heart disease using magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVES

To introduce a novel hypothesis and method to characterise pathomechanisms underlying myocardial ischemia in chronic ischemic heart disease by local fractal analysis (FA) of the ischemic myocardial transition region in perfusion imaging.

METHODS

Vascular mechanisms to compensate ischemia are regulated at various vascular scales with their superimposed perfusion pattern being hypothetically self-similar. Dedicated FA software ("FraktalWandler") has been developed. Fractal dimensions during first-pass (FD_first-pass) and recirculation (FD_{recirculation}) are hypothesised to indicate the predominating pathomechanism and ischemic severity, respectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients with evidence of myocardial ischemia in 108 ischemic myocardial segments on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were analysed. The 40th and 60th percentiles of FD_first-pass were used for pathomechanical classification, assigning lesions with FD_first-pass ≤ 2.335 to predominating coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and ≥2.387 to predominating coronary artery disease (CAD). Optimal classification point in ROC analysis was FD_first-pass = 2.358. FD_{recirculation} correlated moderately with per cent diameter stenosis in invasive coronary angiography in lesions classified CAD (r = 0.472, p = 0.001) but not CMD (r = 0.082, p = 0.600).

CONCLUSIONS

The ischemic transition region may provide information on pathomechanical composition and severity of myocardial ischemia. FA of this region is feasible and may improve diagnosis compared to traditional noninvasive myocardial perfusion analysis.

KEY POINTS

• A novel hypothesis and method is introduced to pathophysiologically characterise myocardial ischemia. • The ischemic transition region appears a meaningful diagnostic target in perfusion imaging. • Fractal analysis may characterise pathomechanical composition and severity of myocardial ischemia.

Comparison of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) with stress nuclear perfusion for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

To assess the diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance (stress CMR) vs stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain.

BACKGROUND

SPECT imaging is the most utilized outpatient procedure in the United States. The diagnostic accuracy of SPECT can be limited by soft tissue attenuation and low spatial resolution. Stress CMR has much higher spatial resolution and without the susceptibility to soft tissue attenuation.

METHODS

Eighty-seven patients without a history of CAD presenting to the ED with chest pain were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent both stress CMR and stress SPECT imaging within 12 hours of presentation. Both the stress imaging tests were interpreted immediately for clinical purposes and coronary angiography was performed if either was abnormal. Patients were considered to have significant CAD if identified by angiography (≥50%) or if a cardiac event (cardiac death, myocardial infarction or revascularization) occurred during follow-up (mean 2.6 ± 1.1 years).

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were referred for coronary angiography; 29 due to a positive stress test and eight patients for persistent chest pain despite two negative stress tests. There were 22 patients who had significant CAD (≥50%). The remaining patients were followed for 2.6 ± 1.1 years. At the conclusion of the follow-up period, there were four clinical events. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of CMR are 85%, 93%, and 89%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of stress SPECT are 84%, 91%, and 88%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Stress CMR has similar diagnostic accuracy as stress SPECT in diagnosis of CAD.

Noninvasive Imaging to Evaluate Women With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

Declines in cardiovascular deaths have been dramatic for men but occur significantly less in women. Among patients with symptomatic ischemic heart disease (IHD), women experience relatively worse outcomes compared with their male counterparts. Evidence to date has failed to adequately explore unique female imaging targets and their correlative signs and symptoms of IHD as major determinants of IHD risk. We highlight sex-specific anatomic and functional differences in contemporary imaging and introduce imaging approaches that leverage refined targets that may improve IHD risk prediction and identify potential therapeutic strategies for symptomatic women.

Impact of arrhythmia on diagnostic performance of adenosine stress CMR in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic performance of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with arrhythmias presenting for work-up of suspected or known CAD is largely unknown, since most CMR studies currently available exclude arrhythmic patients from analysis fearing gating problems, or other artifacts will impair image quality. The primary aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of adenosine stress CMR for detection of significant coronary stenosis in patients with arrhythmia presenting for 1) work-up of suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), or 2) work-up of ischemia in known CAD.

METHODS

Patients with arrhythmia referred for work-up of suspected CAD or work-up of ischemia in known CAD undergoing adenosine stress CMR were included if they had coronary angiography within four weeks of CMR.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-nine patients were included (n = 64 atrial fibrillation, n = 87 frequent ventricular extrasystoles, n = 8 frequent supraventricular extrasystoles). Of these, n = 72 had suspected CAD, and n = 87 had known CAD. Diagnostic accuracy of the adenosine stress CMR for detection of significant CAD was 73 % for the entire population (sensitivity 72 %, specificity 76 %). Diagnostic accuracy was 75 % (sensitivity 80 %, specificity 74 %) in patients with suspected CAD, and 74 % (sensitivity 71 %, specificity 79 %) in the group with known CAD. For different types of arrhythmia, diagnostic accuracy of CMR was 70 % in the atrial fibrillation group, and 79 % in patients with ventricular extrasystoles. On a per coronary territory analysis, diagnostic accuracy of CMR was 77 % for stenosis of the left and 82 % for stenosis of the right coronary artery.

CONCLUSION

The present data demonstrates good diagnostic performance of adenosine stress CMR for detection of significant coronary stenosis in patients with arrhythmia presenting for work-up of suspected CAD, or work-up of ischemia in known CAD. This holds true for a per patient, as well as for a per coronary territory analysis.

Multi-modality imaging for the assessment of myocardial perfusion with emphasis on stress perfusion CT and MR imaging

High-quality and non-invasive diagnostic tools for assessing myocardial ischemia are necessary for therapeutic decisions regarding coronary artery disease. Myocardial perfusion has been studied using myocardial contrast echo perfusion, single-photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and, more recently, computed tomography. The addition of coronary computed tomography angiography to myocardial perfusion imaging improves the specificity and overall diagnostic accuracy of detecting the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis. This study reviews the benefits, limitations, and imaging findings of various imaging modalities for assessing myocardial perfusion, with particular emphasis on stress perfusion computed tomography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Detection of coronary artery disease in postmenopausal women: the significance of integrated stress imaging tests in a 4-year prognostic study

BACKGROUND

The present prospective study investigated whether a combined approach integrating two different stress imaging modalities may improve the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic impact of non-invasive coronary artery disease (CAD) tests in postmenopausal women. In women non-invasive tests for detecting CAD are less accurate than in men, leading to a high proportion of unnecessary coronary angiographies (CAs).

METHODS

424 consecutive postmenopausal women (mean 61 ± 7 years, mean Reynolds Risk Score 13 ± 3 %) with symptoms suggestive of CAD were prospectively included and followed up for 4 ± 1 years. Each patient underwent CA, stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) by adenosine, dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) within 7 ± 3 days.

RESULTS

Anatomically obstructive coronary artery disease (≥50 % diameter stenosis) was present in 157 women (37 %). The combination of two stress imaging modalities significantly increased the positive predictive values (PPV) to 90 ± 3, 88 ± 3 and 87 ± 2 % for CMR/DSE, DSE/SPECT and CMR/SPECT, respectively. For patients with negative combined test results, the survival analysis showed a 4-year cumulative event-free survival rate of 96-97 % for all combinations. This new approach is cost effective due to the resulting reduction in unnecessary CAs (with potential side effects and corresponding therapies) as well as reducing hospitalization time.

CONCLUSIONS

In symptomatic postmenopausal women, combination of two negative stress imaging results significantly increases the PPV for detection of CAD and excludes future cardiovascular events with high accuracy. This approach may be applied to improve the prognostic precision of non-invasive CAD tests and to avoid unnecessary CAs.

Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease from the Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary Heart Disease (CE-MARC) Trial

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of death in women, and underdiagnosis contributes to the high mortality. This study compared the sex-specific diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 235 women and 393 men with suspected angina underwent CMR, SPECT, and x-ray angiography as part of the Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary Heart Disease (CE-MARC) study. CMR comprised adenosine stress/rest perfusion, cine imaging, late gadolinium enhancement, and magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Gated adenosine stress/rest SPECT was performed with (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin. For CMR, the sensitivity in women and men was similar (88.7% versus 85.6%; P=0.57), as was the specificity (83.5% versus 82.8%; P=0.86). For SPECT, the sensitivity was significantly worse in women than in men (50.9% versus 70.8%; P=0.007), but the specificities were similar (84.1% versus 81.3%; P=0.48). The sensitivity in both the female and male groups was significantly higher with CMR than SPECT (P<0.0001 for both), but the specificity was similar (P=0.77 and P=1.00, respectively). For perfusion-only components, CMR outperformed SPECT in women (area under the curve, 0.90 versus 0.67; P<0.0001) and in men (area under the curve, 0.89 versus 0.74; P<0.0001). Diagnostic accuracy was similar in both sexes with perfusion CMR (P=1.00) but was significantly worse in women with SPECT (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In both sexes, CMR has greater sensitivity than SPECT. Unlike SPECT, there are no significant sex differences in the diagnostic performance of CMR. These findings, plus an absence of ionizing radiation exposure, mean that CMR should be more widely adopted in women with suspected coronary artery disease.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL

http://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN77246133.

Stress cardiac MR imaging compared with stress echocardiography in the early evaluation of patients who present to the emergency department with intermediate-risk chest pain

PURPOSE

To compare the utility and efficacy of stress cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and stress echocardiography in an emergency setting in patients with acute chest pain (CP) and intermediate risk of coronary artery disease (CAD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board for research ethics. Sixty patients without history of CAD presented to the emergency department with intermediate-risk acute CP and were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent both stress cardiac MR imaging and stress echocardiography in random order within 12 hours of presentation. Stress imaging results were interpreted clinically immediately (blinded interpretation was performed months later), and coronary angiography was performed if either result was abnormal. CAD was considered significant if it was identified at angiography (narrowing >50% ) or if a cardiac event (death or myocardial infarction) occurred during follow-up (mean, 14 months ± 5 [standard deviation]). McNemar test was used to compare the diagnostic accuracy of techniques.

RESULTS

Stress cardiac MR imaging and stress echocardiography had similar specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values (92% vs 96%, 93% vs 88%, 67% vs 60%, and 100% vs 91%, respectively, for clinical interpretation; 90% vs 92%, 90% vs 88%, 58% vs 56%, and 98% vs 94%, respectively, for blinded interpretation). Stress cardiac MR imaging had higher sensitivity at clinical interpretation (100% vs 38%, P = .025), which did not reach significance at blinded interpretation (88% vs 63%, P = .31). However, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed stress cardiac MR imaging to be the strongest independent predictor of significant CAD (P = .002).

CONCLUSION

In patients presenting to the emergency department with intermediate-risk CP, adenosine stress cardiac MR imaging performed within 12 hours of presentation is safe and potentially has improved performance characteristics compared with stress echocardiography. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Cost-effectiveness of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of coronary heart disease: an economic evaluation using data from the CE-MARC study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for coronary heart disease (CHD) derived from the CE-MARC study.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision analytic model to compare eight strategies for the diagnosis of CHD.

SETTING

Secondary care out-patients (Cardiology Department).

PATIENTS

Patients referred to cardiologists for the further evaluation of symptoms thought to be angina pectoris.

INTERVENTIONS

Eight different strategies were considered, including different combinations of exercise treadmill testing (ETT), single-photon emission CT (SPECT), cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and coronary angiography (CA).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Costs expressed as UK sterling in 2010-2011 prices and health outcomes in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The time horizon was 50 years.

RESULTS

Based on the characteristics of patients in the CE-MARC study, only two strategies appear potentially cost-effective for diagnosis of CHD, both including CMR. The choice is between two strategies: one in which CMR follows a positive or inconclusive ETT, followed by CA if CMR is positive or inconclusive (Strategy 3 in the model); and the other where CMR is followed by CA if CMR is positive or inconclusive (Strategy 5 in the model). The more cost-effective of these two rests on the threshold cost per QALY gained below which health systems define an intervention as cost-effective. Strategy 3 appears cost-effective at the lower end of the threshold range used in the UK (£20 000 per QALY gained), while Strategy 5 appears cost-effective at the higher end of the threshold range (£30 000 per QALY). The results are robust to various sources of uncertainty although prior likelihood of CHD requiring revascularisation and the rate at which false negative patients are eventually appropriately identified do impact upon the results.

CONCLUSIONS

The CE-MARC study showed that CMR had superior diagnostic accuracy to SPECT and concluded that CMR should be more widely used in the investigation of patients with CHD. The economic evaluation results show that using CMR is also a cost-effective strategy and supports the wider adoption of this modality.

MR myocardial perfusion imaging

Contrast material-enhanced myocardial perfusion imaging by using cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has, during the past decade, evolved into an accurate technique for diagnosing coronary artery disease, with excellent prognostic value. Advantages such as high spatial resolution; absence of ionizing radiation; and the ease of routine integration with an assessment of viability, wall motion, and cardiac anatomy are readily recognized. The need for training and technical expertise and the regulatory hurdles, which might prevent vendors from marketing cardiac MR perfusion imaging, may have hampered its progress. The current review considers both the technical developments and the clinical experience with cardiac MR perfusion imaging, which hopefully demonstrates that it has long passed the stage of a research technique. In fact, cardiac MR perfusion imaging is moving beyond traditional indications such as diagnosis of coronary disease to novel applications such as in congenital heart disease, where the imperatives of avoidance of ionizing radiation and achievement of high spatial resolution are of high priority. More wide use of cardiac MR perfusion imaging, and novel applications thereof, are aided by the progress in parallel imaging, high-field-strength cardiac MR imaging, and other technical advances discussed in this review.

Reproducibility of myocardial perfusion reserve - variations in measurements from post processing using commercially available software

PURPOSE

Adenosine stress first pass cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is a rapidly evolving tool in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease (IHD). The rest and stress first pass myocardial perfusion data may be interpreted using commercially available software for calculation of time intensity curves in order to generate a numeric value of the segmental or whole heart myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI). The objective of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the data generated by standard commercially available software.

METHODS

Data from 20 adenosine stress CMRI (1.5 T) studies were analyzed using commercially available CAAS MRV 3.3 software (Pie Medical Imaging B.V., Netherlands) for calculation of the MPRI. The stress CMRI was performed using a standardized protocol in 20 women including 10 women with angina and the absence of obstructive CAD and 10 healthy volunteers. MPRI calculation was made in a standardized manner on separate occasions by two independent observers. A single observer repeated the calculation of MPRI three months later, without reference to the prior data. Basal, mid, and apical segments, for the whole myocardium, sub-endocardium, and sub-epicardium were analyzed. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), repeatability coefficients (RC), and coefficients of variation (CoV) were determined.

RESULTS

The MPRI results by repeated software measurements were highly correlated, with potentially important variations in measurement observed. The myocardial inter-observer ICC was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.57, 0.92) with a CoV of 7.5%, and intra-observer ICC was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.77, 0.95) with a CoV of 3.6%. The mid-ventricular level MPRI was most reproducible, with intra-observer ICC at 0.91 (95% CI, 0.77, 0.97); intra-observer measurement was more reproducible than inter-observer measurement.

CONCLUSIONS

There is variation in measurement of MPRI observed in post processing of perfusion data when using a standardized approach and commercially available software. This has implications in the interpretation of data obtained for clinical and research purposes.

Superior diagnostic performance of perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus SPECT to detect coronary artery disease: The secondary endpoints of the multicenter multivendor MR-IMPACT II (Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary Artery Disease Trial)

BACKGROUND

Perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is generally accepted as an alternative to SPECT to assess myocardial ischemia non-invasively. However its performance vs gated-SPECT and in sub-populations is not fully established. The goal was to compare in a multicenter setting the diagnostic performance of perfusion-CMR and gated-SPECT for the detection of CAD in various populations using conventional x-ray coronary angiography (CXA) as the standard of reference.

METHODS

In 33 centers (in US and Europe) 533 patients, eligible for CXA or SPECT, were enrolled in this multivendor trial. SPECT and CXA were performed within 4 weeks before or after CMR in all patients. Prevalence of CAD in the sample was 49% and 515 patients received MR contrast medium. Drop-out rates for CMR and SPECT were 5.6% and 3.7%, respectively (ns). The study was powered for the primary endpoint of non-inferiority of CMR vs SPECT for both, sensitivity and specificity for the detection of CAD (using a single-threshold reading), the results for the primary endpoint were reported elsewhere. In this article secondary endpoints are presented, i.e. the diagnostic performance of CMR versus SPECT in subpopulations such as multi-vessel disease (MVD), in men, in women, and in patients without prior myocardial infarction (MI). For diagnostic performance assessment the area under the receiver-operator-characteristics-curve (AUC) was calculated. Readers were blinded versus clinical data, CXA, and imaging results.

RESULTS

The diagnostic performance (= area under ROC = AUC) of CMR was superior to SPECT (p = 0.0004, n = 425) and to gated-SPECT (p = 0.018, n = 253). CMR performed better than SPECT in MVD (p = 0.003 vs all SPECT, p = 0.04 vs gated-SPECT), in men (p = 0.004, n = 313) and in women (p = 0.03, n = 112) as well as in the non-infarct patients (p = 0.005, n = 186 in 1-3 vessel disease and p = 0.015, n = 140 in MVD).

CONCLUSION

In this large multicenter, multivendor study the diagnostic performance of perfusion-CMR to detect CAD was superior to perfusion SPECT in the entire population and in sub-groups. Perfusion-CMR can be recommended as an alternative for SPECT imaging.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT00977093.

Comparison of exercise electrocardiography and stress perfusion CMR for the detection of coronary artery disease in women

BACKGROUND

Exercise electrocardiography (ECG) is frequently used in the work-up of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), however the accuracy is reduced in women. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) stress testing can accurately diagnose CAD in women. To date, a direct comparison of CMR to ECG has not been performed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively enrolled 88 consecutive women with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of CAD. Patients underwent a comprehensive clinical evaluation, exercise ECG, a CMR stress test including perfusion and infarct imaging, and x-ray coronary angiography (CA) within 24 hours. CAD was defined as stenosis ≥70% on quantitative analysis of CA.Exercise ECG, CMR and CA was completed in 68 females (age 66.4 ± 8.8 years, number of CAD risk factors 3.5±1.4). The prevalence of CAD on CA was 29%. The Duke treadmill score (DTS) in the entire group was -3.0±5.4 and was similar in those with and without CAD (-4.5±5.8 and -2.4±5.1; P=0.12). Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for CAD diagnosis was higher for CMR compared with exercise ECG (sensitivities 85% and 50%, P=0.02, specificities 94% and 73%, P=0.01, and accuracies 91% and 66%, P=0.0007, respectively). Even after applying the DTS the accuracy of CMR was higher compared to exercise ECG (area under ROC curve 0.94±0.03 vs 0.56±0.07; P=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In women with intermediate-to-high risk for CAD who are able to exercise and have interpretable resting ECG, CMR stress perfusion imaging has higher accuracy for the detection of relevant obstruction of the epicardial coronaries when directly compared to exercise ECG.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial

BACKGROUND

In patients with suspected coronary heart disease, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is the most widely used test for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia, but its diagnostic accuracy is reported to be variable and it exposes patients to ionising radiation. The aim of this study was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of a multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocol with x-ray coronary angiography as the reference standard, and to compare CMR with SPECT, in patients with suspected coronary heart disease.

METHODS

In this prospective trial patients with suspected angina pectoris and at least one cardiovascular risk factor were scheduled for CMR, SPECT, and invasive x-ray coronary angiography. CMR consisted of rest and adenosine stress perfusion, cine imaging, late gadolinium enhancement, and MR coronary angiography. Gated adenosine stress and rest SPECT used (99m)Tc tetrofosmin. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of CMR. This trial is registered at controlled-trials.com, number ISRCTN77246133.

FINDINGS

In the 752 recruited patients, 39% had significant CHD as identified by x-ray angiography. For multiparametric CMR the sensitivity was 86·5% (95% CI 81·8-90·1), specificity 83·4% (79·5-86·7), positive predictive value 77·2%, (72·1-81·6) and negative predictive value 90·5% (87·1-93·0). The sensitivity of SPECT was 66·5% (95% CI 60·4-72·1), specificity 82·6% (78·5-86·1), positive predictive value 71·4% (65·3-76·9), and negative predictive value 79·1% (74·8-82·8). The sensitivity and negative predictive value of CMR and SPECT differed significantly (p<0·0001 for both) but specificity and positive predictive value did not (p=0·916 and p=0·061, respectively).

INTERPRETATION

CE-MARC is the largest, prospective, real world evaluation of CMR and has established CMR's high diagnostic accuracy in coronary heart disease and CMR's superiority over SPECT. It should be adopted more widely than at present for the investigation of coronary heart disease.

FUNDING

British Heart Foundation.

Stress myocardial perfusion imaging by CMR provides strong prognostic value to cardiac events regardless of patient's sex

OBJECTIVES

The major aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging can provide robust prognostic value in women presenting with suspected ischemia, to the same extent as in men.

BACKGROUND

Compelling evidence indicates that women with coronary artery disease (CAD) experience worse outcomes than men owing to a lack of early diagnosis and management. Numerous clinical studies have shown that stress CMR detects evidence of myocardial ischemia and infarction at high accuracy. Compared to nuclear scintigraphy, CMR is free of ionizing radiation, has high spatial resolution for imaging small hearts, and overcomes breast attenuation artifacts, which are substantial advantages when imaging women for CAD.

METHODS

We performed stress CMR in 405 patients (168 women, mean age 58 ± 14 years) referred for ischemia assessment. CMR techniques included cine cardiac function, perfusion imaging during vasodilating stress, and late gadolinium enhancement imaging. All patients were followed for major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 30 months, MACE occurred in 36 patients (9%) including 21 cardiac deaths and 15 acute myocardial infarctions. In women, CMR evidence of ischemia (ISCHEMIA) demonstrated strong association with MACE (unadjusted hazard ratio: 49.9, p < 0.0001). While women with ISCHEMIA(+) had an annual MACE rate of 15%, women with ISCHEMIA(-) had very low annual MACE rate (0.3%), which was not statistically different from the low annual MACE rate in men with ISCHEMIA(-) (1.1%). CMR myocardial ischemia score was the strongest multivariable predictor of MACE in this cohort, for both women and men, indicating robust cardiac prognostication regardless of sex.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to avoiding exposure to ionizing radiation, stress CMR myocardial perfusion imaging is an effective and robust risk-stratifying tool for patients of either sex presenting with possible ischemia.

Assessment of myocardial ischemia with cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Assessment of myocardial ischemia in symptomatic patients remains a common and challenging clinical situation faced by physicians. Risk stratification by presence of ischemia provides important utility for both prognostic assessment and management. Unfortunately, current noninvasive modalities possess numerous limitations and have limited prognostic capacity. More recently, ischemia assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has been shown to be a safe, available, and potentially cost-effective alternative with both high diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance has numerous advantages over other noninvasive methods, including high temporal and spatial resolution, relatively few contraindications, and absence of ionizing radiation. Furthermore, studies assessing the clinical utility and cost effectiveness of CMR in the short-term setting for patients without evidence of an acute myocardial infarction have also demonstrated favorable results. This review will cover techniques of ischemia assessment with CMR by both stress-induced wall motion abnormalities as well as myocardial perfusion imaging. The diagnostic and prognostic performance studies will also be reviewed, and the use of CMR for ischemia assessment will be compared with other commonly used noninvasive modalities.

Pharmacological stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Over the past decade, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has evolved into a cardiac stress testing modality that can be used to diagnose myocardial ischemia using intravenous dobutamine or vasodilator perfusion agents such as adenosine or dipyridamole. Because CMR produces high-resolution tomographic images of the human heart in multiple imaging planes, it has become a highly attractive noninvasive testing modality for those suspected of having myocardial ischemia. The purpose of this article is to review the clinical, diagnostic, and prognostic utility of stress CMR testing for patients with (or suspected of having) coronary artery disease.

Gender-based prognostic value of pharmacological cardiac magnetic resonance stress testing: head-to-head comparison of adenosine perfusion and dobutamine wall motion imaging

This study evaluated the gender related long-term prognostic value of adenosine perfusion and dobutamine wall motion imaging as assessed during a combined single-session stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination. In 717 patients a combined CMR stress examination was performed. Inducible perfusion deficits and wall motion abnormalities were identified visually. Clinical parameters were assessed at the time of the CMR examination. All patients were contacted to determine the occurrence of hard cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction) during a median follow-up period of 5.3 years. A complete combined CMR examination and follow-up data were available in 679 patients (471 men). A total of 77 hard cardiac events (63 in men) occurred during follow-up. Multivariate analysis revealed the presence of inducible perfusion deficits or wall motion abnormalities as independent predictors of hard cardiac events for both gender with an incremental value over conventional cardiovascular risk factors. In case of a negative stress test result, event-free survival was 100% in women for 4 years and >99% in men for 2 years after the CMR examination. CMR perfusion and wall motion testing are equally suited for cardiac risk stratification in men and women. Stress CMR negative women exhibited very low event rates up to 4 years following the examination, while in men annual event rates increased after the second year. Consequently, the generally proposed 2-year warranty period of non-invasive stress testing may be prolonged to a 4 year level in CMR stress testing negative women.

Ischemic heart disease: comprehensive evaluation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Considerable technical advances over the past decade have increased the clinical application of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. A comprehensive CMR examination can accurately measure left and right ventricular size and function, identify the presence and extent of reversible versus irreversible myocardial injury, and detect inducible ischemia. Streamlined protocols allow such a CMR examination to be a time-efficient diagnostic tool in patients with coronary artery disease. Moreover, edema imaging with T2-weighted CMR allows the detection of acute coronary syndromes. In this review, we present the relevant CMR methods and discuss practical uses of CMR in acute and chronic ischemic heart disease.

Influence of adenosine on ventricular function measurements as part of a comprehensive stress perfusion magnetic resonance imaging study

BACKGROUND

Stress-rest perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become one of the major indications for cardiovascular MRI. Standard multibreath hold short-axis image acquisition is the gold standard for LV function assessment and part of a comprehensive stress-rest perfusion MRI study, but takes up to 10 min. The total scan time could significantly be shortened when cine imaging would be performed between stress and rest perfusion.

PURPOSE

To systematically study whether adenosine, albeit its short half-life time, influences LV function measurements in this setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with suspected and/or known coronary artery disease underwent 3-Tesla adenosine (140 µg/min/kg) stress-rest perfusion MRI. A stack of short-axis slices covering the entire ventricles was acquired before and ≥3 min after adenosine infusion using standard multibreath-hold 2D steady-state free precession imaging. LV volumes (EDV, ESV), EF, and mass were calculated by the slice summation method, and wall motion was assessed using a 4-point scoring scale. Reproducibility was assessed by Bland-Altman statistics.

RESULTS

EDV, ESV, EF, and mass were not significantly different between the two imaging time points (before versus after adenosine administration) in all patients (P ≥ 0.346) and patients with impaired LV function (P ≥ 0.718). Wall motion scores did not differ either (P ≥ 0.124). Inter-observer variability before (P ≥ 0.468) and after (P ≥ 0.451) adenosine infusion was low.

CONCLUSION

Short-axis cine imaging for LV function assessment can accurately be performed between stress and rest imaging. These data demonstrate that potential effects of adenosine on LV function are of short duration, and propose a new time-saving imaging protocol without compromising accuracy.

Diagnostic performance of combined cardiac MRI for detection of coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiac MR (CMR) for detecting significant CAD (≥70% narrowing) in comparison with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as a reference standard.

METHODS

Examinations of 54 patients who underwent both stress perfusion CMR and ICA for investigation of CAD between 2007 and 2009 were evaluated. The CMR protocol included dipyridamole stress and rest perfusion, stress and rest cine MRI for assessment of ventricular function and delayed gadolinium enhancement for assessment of myocardial viability and detection of infarction. CMR interpretation was performed by 2 observers blinded to the results of ICA and the clinical history.

RESULTS

From a total of 54 patients, 37 (68.5%) showed significant CAD in 71 coronary territories. A perfusion defect was detected in 35 patients and in 69 coronary territories. Individual stress perfusion CMR evaluation showed the highest accuracy (83%) of the CMR techniques. The combined analysis using all sequences increased the overall accuracy of CMR to 87%.

CONCLUSION

Combination of perfusion and cine-MR during stress/rest, associated to delayed enhancement in the same protocol improves CMRI diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity for patients with significant coronary stenosis, and may therefore be helpful for risk stratification and defining treatment strategies.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in stable ischaemic heart disease

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a new robust versatile non-invasive imaging technique that can detect global and regional myocardial dysfunction, presence of myocardial ischaemia and myocardial scar tissue in one imaging session without radiation, with superb spatial and temporal resolution, inherited three-dimensional data collection and with relatively safe contrast material. The reproducibility of CMR is high which makes it possible to use this technique for serial assessment to evaluate the effect of revascularisation therapy in patients with ischaemic heart disease.

Stress perfusion imaging using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a review

Stress perfusion CMR can provide both excellent diagnostic and important prognostic information in the context of a comprehensive assessment of cardiac anatomy and function. This coupled with the high spatial resolution, and the lack of both attenuation artefacts and ionising radiation, make CMR stress perfusion imaging a highly attractive stress imaging modality. It is now in routine use in many centres, and shows promise in evaluating patients with clinical problems beyond those of epicardial coronary disease.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: choice of the year: which imaging modality is best for evaluation of myocardial ischemia? (MRI-side)

The increasing variety of available cardiac imaging techniques have made the investigation of coronary artery disease more complex. On the one hand, nuclear cardiology or myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) allows accurate and reliable quantitative measurement of myocardial blood flow. On the other hand, a newer technique, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is an attractive alternative for achieving similar purposes without exposing patients to radiation hazards. With a higher spatial resolution, CMR is more sensitive for detecting subendocardial ischemia; small myocardial infarction and/or fibrosis, which cannot be achieved in a nuclear study. Nuclear MPI has dominated clinical practice over the past 3 decades on the basis of an extensive amount of research. More upcoming research on CMR would warrant more evidence-based data of its value for disease diagnosis, prognosis and risk stratification and incorporating it into the clinical diagnostic and management algorithm.

Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease

AIM

Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the diagnosis of significant obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) through meta-analysis of the available data.

METHODOLOGY

Original articles in any language published before July 2009 were selected from available databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and BioMedCentral) using the combined search terms of magnetic resonance, perfusion, and coronary angiography; with the exploded term coronary artery disease. Statistical analysis was only performed on studies that: (1) used a [greater than or equal to] 1.5 Tesla MR scanner; (2) employed invasive coronary angiography as the reference standard for diagnosing significant obstructive CAD, defined as a [greater than or equal to] 50% diameter stenosis; and (3) provided sufficient data to permit analysis.

RESULTS

From the 263 citations identified, 55 relevant original articles were selected. Only 35 fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria, and of these 26 presented data on patient-based analysis. The overall patient-based analysis demonstrated a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI: 88-91%), and a specificity of 80% (95% CI: 78-83%). Adenosine stress perfusion CMR had better sensitivity than with dipyridamole (90% (88-92%) versus 86% (80-90%), P = 0.022), and a tendency to a better specificity (81% (78-84%) versus 77% (71-82%), P = 0.065).

CONCLUSION

Stress perfusion CMR is highly sensitive for detection of CAD but its specificity remains moderate.

Diagnosing coronary artery disease in women: an update on cardiac imaging modalities

Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains the leading cause of death in women. However, there are multiple challenges to the diagnosis of CHD in women, including: 1) women perceive their risk of CHD to be lower than it truly is, 2) women frequently present with atypical cardiac symptoms, 3) traditional stress tests have lower accuracy in women than in men, 4) women have a lower frequency of obstructive CHD detected at angiography than do men, and 5) a high percentage of women without obstructive CHD by invasive angiography have recurrent chest pain. Given the increasing number of options and complexity of noninvasive testing for CHD, it is important for women's health care providers to select the best test for a given patient. Newer imaging modalities such as cardiac computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging offer speed, convenience, and high diagnostic accuracy in women. The goal of this article is to provide practitioners with an overview of the conventional diagnostic tests and to compare these with the newer imaging modalities. The appropriate application of diagnostic tests should allow practitioners to identify accurately and reassure those patients who are at low risk while targeting those who have preclinical or symptomatic atherosclerosis so that they can receive aggressive medical therapy, referral to cardiovascular specialists, or both.

Direct comparison of rest and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion CT with rest and stress SPECT

INTRODUCTION

We have recently described a technique for assessing myocardial perfusion using adenosine-mediated stress imaging (CTP) with dual source computed tomography. SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) is a widely utilized and extensively validated method for assessing myocardial perfusion. The aim of this study was to determine the level of agreement between CTP and SPECT-MPI at rest and under stress on a per-segment, per-vessel, and per-patient basis.

METHODS

Forty-seven consecutive patients underwent CTP and SPECT-MPI. Perfusion images were interpreted using the 17 segment AHA model and were scored on a 0 (normal) to 3 (abnormal) scale. Summed rest and stress scores were calculated for each vascular territory and patient by adding corresponding segmental scores.

RESULTS

On a per-segment basis (n = 799), CTP and SPECT-MPI demonstrated excellent correlation: Goodman-Kruskall gamma = .59 (P < .0001) for stress and .75 (P < .0001) for rest. On a per-vessel basis (n = 141), CTP and SPECT-MPI summed scores demonstrated good correlation: Pearson r = .56 (P < .0001) for stress and .66 (P < .0001) for rest. On a per-patient basis (n = 47), CTP and SPECT-MPI demonstrated good correlation: Pearson r = .60 (P < .0001) for stress and .76 (P < .0001) for rest.

CONCLUSIONS

CTP compares favorably with SPECT-MPI for detection, extent, and severity of myocardial perfusion defects at rest and stress.

The many facets of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: review of background, clinical utility, and increasing use in the community hospital

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR or cardiac MRI) has advanced dramatically in the last ten years and has been proven a reliable and flexible method for cardiac diagnosis. Stress perfusion MRI is a new technique that accurately detects coronary heart disease with high sensitivity and specificity. The role of CMR is also increasing for the evaluation of congestive heart failure and cardiomyopathy. Late gadolinium enhancement highlights areas of myocardial scar and helps predict prognosis. CMR usually complements, but does not fully replace, other diagnostic modalities. Careful patient selection is required to ensure safety in the presence of this powerful magnetic field. MRI gives unique tissue characterization without ionizing radiation. No longer used just for esoteric conditions, CMR is becoming common in the community hospital.

Dobutamine cardiac magnetic resonance results predict cardiac prognosis in women with known or suspected ischemic heart disease

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic utility of dobutamine cardiac magnetic resonance (DCMR) stress test results in women.

BACKGROUND

To date, the preponderance of studies reporting the utility of DCMR stress results for predicting cardiac prognosis have been performed in men. We sought to determine the utility of DCMR results for predicting cardiac prognosis in women.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty-six consecutively referred women underwent DCMR in which left ventricular wall motion (LVWM) was assessed at rest and after intravenous dobutamine and atropine. Inducible LVWM abnormalities were identified during testing. Women were contacted to determine the post-DCMR occurrence of a cardiac event. All events were substantiated according to defined criteria and then were verified after a thorough medical record review by individuals blinded to testing data.

RESULTS

Women were contacted an average of 6.2 +/- 1.6 (median 6.2, range 0.8 to 10.4) years after DCMR; 27% of the women experienced an inducible LVWM abnormality during testing. In those with and without inducible LVWM abnormalities, the proportion of women with cardiac events were 63% versus 30%, respectively, (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8 to 4.3 for the presence of inducible LVWM abnormalities p < 0.0001). The proportion of women with myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiac death were 33.3% and 7.5%, respectively. This resulted in a HR for MI and cardiac death of 4.1 (95% CI: 2.2 to 9.4) for those with versus those without inducible LVWM abnormalities; p < 0.0001. A subgroup analysis was performed in women without a history of coronary artery disease and in those with LVWM abnormalities, DCMR remained an adverse predictor of cardiac events (HR: 4.0, 95% CI: 1.8 to 9.0, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Inducible LVWM abnormalities during DCMR predict cardiac death and MI in women. Similar to men, these results indicate that DCMR is a valuable noninvasive stress imaging modality for identifying cardiac risk in women with known or suspected ischemic heart disease.