Quality of life and nasal splints after primary cleft lip and nose repair: Prospective assessment of information and tolerance

Use of nasal retainers in the primary management of cleft lip: Current practices in France

BACKGROUND

The primary surgical management of cleft lip (CL) or cleft lip and palate (CLP) aims to achieve harmonious lip and nasal symmetry while ensuring satisfactory ventilation. Postoperative nasal retainers are commonly used, though both duration of use and conformer type used vary widely. This study aimed to establish an inventory of current practices for primary cheilorhinoplasty and nasal retainer use in France.

METHODS

A survey was sent to surgeons within and outside the French National Clefts and Facial Malformations (MAFACE) network. Questions focused on age when primary cleft closure is performed, retainer types used, conformation duration, and estimated patient compliance. Responses were collected March-July 2023.

RESULTS

Thirty-two surgeons responded with substantial variations in practices. For isolated CL, the age for primary cleft closure was 1-6 months, with 28 % performing surgery at 3 months, 12.5 % between 3 and 6 months, 44 % at 6 months. In cases with CLP, 63 % performed simultaneous surgery at 6 months. Two surgeons (6 %) reported preoperative nasoalveolar molding and 30 surgeons (94 %) reported postoperative nasal retainer use. Retainer type used immediately after surgery varied, with equal use of commercial retainers (31 %), silicone sheets (31 %), and in-house retainers (31 %). Duration of retainer prescription was in majority 3-4 months. Notably, 44 % of surgeons reported <70 % adherence rates for the recommended conformation duration, while 25 % reported very good compliance.

CONCLUSION

Primary cheilorhinoplasty and nasal conformation practices are highly diverse in France. Suboptimal patient compliance demonstrates the need for improved retainer design and strategies to enhance compliance.

Biomechanical Property and Biocompatibility of a New Silicone Rubber Nasal Retainer (Nostriloo)

Nasal retainers have been utilized to maintain the position of the nose after primary rhinoplasty in cleft lip patients. However, commercial nasal retainers made from silicone are quite expensive. To address this issue, the authors designed an alternative nasal retainer that is affordable, safe, and has similar biomechanical and biocompatibility properties to other commercial nasal retainers. Three types of nasal retainers were tested: our own (Nostriloo), a commercial nasal retainer from Turkey, and another one from Taiwan. There were 3 samples on each group, with a total sample of 9 retainers. Each sample was tested for biomechanical property and biocompatibility. Elasticity modulus, tensile strength, and direct and indirect toxicity were analyzed. Nostriloo had the least durable tensile strength but showed similar elastic modulus (2.76 ± 0.41 MPa) compared with human lower lateral cartilage (2.09 ± 0.81 MPa). On the basis of direct and indirect toxicity tests, Nostriloo is considered nontoxic. Nostriloo can be utilized for small-scale production and use. Further experiment is needed to produce higher-quality nasal retainers.

Efficacy of Nostril Supportive Splint Treatment for Nasal Septum Deformities after Le Fort I Osteotomy

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of support splint treatment for deformities and deviations of the nasal septum after Le Fort I osteotomy (LFI). Patients were divided into two groups: the retainer group wore a nasal support splint immediately after LFI for 7 days, and the no retainer group did not wear a nasal support splint. Evaluation was performed by measuring the ratio of the difference between the left and right sides of the nasal cavity area (ratio of nasal cavity) and the angle of the nasal septum using three computed tomography frontal images (anterior, middle, and posterior) before and one year postoperatively. Sixty patients were included and divided into two groups, the retainer and no retainer group (n=30 each). Regarding the ratio of nasal cavity on middle images at one year postoperatively, the retainer and no retainer groups differed significantly (0.79±0.13 and 0.67±0.24, respectively; P =0.012). The angle of the nasal septum on anterior images at one year postoperatively was 164.8±11.7° in the retainer group and 156.9±13.5° in the no retainer group, showing a significant difference ( P =0.019). This study suggests that support splint treatment after LFI is effective in preventing post-LFI nasal septal deformation or deviation.

Efficacy of Post-Surgical Nostril Retainer (PSNR) in patients with UCLP Treated with Pre-Surgical NasoAlveolar Molding (NAM) and Primary Cheiloplasty-Rhinoplasty

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this investigation is to determine if the nasal form of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) treated with pre-surgical nasoalveolar molding (NAM) therapy, primary lip-nose surgery, and post-surgical Nostril Retainer (PSNR) is different from patients treated with pre-surgical NAM and primary lip and nose surgery alone.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional, retrospective review of 50 consecutive non-syndromic patients with UCLP: 24 treated with NAM and primary lip-nose surgery followed by PSNR (Group I) compared to 26 patients treated with NAM and primary lip-nose surgery without PSNR (Group II). Polyvinyl siloxane nasal impressions were performed at the average age of 12 months and 6 days. Bilateral measurements of alar width at maximum convexity, total alar base width, nasal tip projection, columella length, and nostril aperture width and height were recorded. Statistical comparison of cleft versus non-cleft side nasal measurements were performed within Group I and Group II, as well as comparison of the difference between the two groups.

RESULTS

Cleft side nasal dimension was statistically significantly better in Group I than Group II across all measures except nasal projection (P<0.05). Group I showed less difference between the cleft and non-cleft side in all six measurements than Group II (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

There is a significant difference in the nasal shape of patients who underwent PSNR compared to those that did not. The patients who used PSNR showed better nasal shape at the average age of 12 months than the control group.

Optimal application of compressive palatal stents following mesiodens removal in pediatric patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

There is no scientific evidence supporting the choice of a palatal stent in patients who underwent removal of an impacted supernumerary tooth. We aimed to investigate the effects of palatal stents in patients who underwent supernumerary tooth removal through a palatal approach and to suggest the optimal stent thickness and material.

Material and Methods

We recruited 144 patients who underwent extraction of a supernumerary tooth between the maxillary anterior teeth. Subjects were assigned to a control group (CG) or one of four compressive palatal stent groups (CPSGs) classified by the thickness and material of the thermoplastic acrylic stent used. Palatal gingival swelling and objective indices (healing, oral hygiene, gingival, and plaque) were evaluated before surgery and on postoperative days (PODs) 3, 7, and 14; pain/discomfort and the Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP) were assessed as subjective indices of the effects of the stent.

Results

The CPSGs showed faster healing than did the CG on PODs 7 (P<0.001) and 14 (P=0.043); swelling was measured by 1.64±0.88 mm and 4.52±0.39 mm, respectively. Although swelling was least in the 4-mm hard group (0.92±0.33 mm), the difference compared with that in the 2-mm hard group (1.01±0.18 mm) was not significant (P=0.077). The CPSGs showed better COHIP (P<0.001-0.036) and pain scores (P<0.001) than did the CG on PODs 1-3.

Conclusions

Compressive palatal stents reduce discomfort by decreasing pain and alleviating swelling. Although a stent is effective regardless of its thickness and material, 2-mm hard stents maximized such positive effects with minimal discomfort.

Key words:Supernumerary tooth, tooth Extraction, postoperative care, oral Health, pediatric dentistry.

Thermographic analysis of postoperative changes in the nasal breathing efficiency in infants and young children with unilateral cleft lip

PURPOSE

Nowadays, cheilorhinoseptoplasty is one of the most efficient methods of cleft lip primary surgical treatment eliminating both functional and esthetic issues. In this work, we have proposed, developed, and experimentally tested a new thermography-based algorithm for studying the efficiency and symmetry of nasal breathing prior to and after the surgery.

METHODS

To investigate and analyze the external respiration function of an infant with unilateral cleft lip after surgical respiration symmetry restoration followed by anatomically shaped postoperative endonasal retainer installation, we have applied contactless thermal imaging in real time.

RESULTS

The developed algorithm enables effective analysis of the respiratory function in infants before and after the surgery. Its combination with applied surgical technique experimentally demonstrated the potential of this approach for improving further the efficiency and symmetry of the airflows through the patient's nasal passages after the primary cheilorhinoseptoplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study constitute a novel and promising avenue of investigation into the breathing function in infants and young children prior to and after their surgery for unilateral cleft lip. The adaptation of our technique to the conditions of a pediatric hospital will make it a safe and informative tool for noninvasive diagnosing the respiratory function in infants in the early postoperative period.

Nasal Duplication: A Review of Literature and Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Nasal duplication is a rare congenital deformity with many subtypes including supernumerary nostril. The challenge of surgical correction is to achieve nasal symmetry and restore nasal airflow. However, there is no defined protocol for treatment, especially with regard to presurgical therapy.

METHODS

We performed a review of literature of studies reporting on patients with supernumerary nostril to complete this review. We then report on a patient with supernumerary nostril who was treated with nostril expansion therapy prior to surgical intervention.

RESULTS

We identified 59 cases of nostril duplication. Because of the rarity of the condition, treatment protocols varied greatly. For our patient, preoperative nasal appliance therapy was implemented for 3 months prior to surgical intervention. Patient was followed-up regularly for 1 year.

DISCUSSION

Although literature on nasal duplication is scarce, there is a general agreement that early intervention has psychological, anatomic, and functional benefits to the patient. In our case report, nostril expansion therapy was easy to implement and facilitated surgical reconstruction, resulting in aesthetic outcome and expanded airway 1 year postoperatively.

A Simple and Economical Nasal Conformer for Clefts!

Aim

To develop a nasal conformer for cleft lip repair which should be easily available and economical.

Method

We have used 'Luer mount' of the infant feeding tube as a nasal conformer in 14 patients.

Result

Follow-up period ranged from 2 weeks to 3 months. Results were satisfactory in all the patients. No significant complications were noticed in any of the patients.

Conclusion

This nasal conformer is easy to use and cost-effective. Though it is not as soft as silicon-based nasal stent but, it provides good support for maintaining the shape of nasal cartilage.