Outcomes following non operative management for proximal humerus fractures

Conservative Versus Operative Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures in Older Individuals

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the frequency and results of conservative treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) in older individuals.

METHODS

Billing data of the BARMER health insurance carrier for all patients of age ≥ 65 for the years 2005-2021 were retrospectively analyzed with multivariable Cox regression models, taking account of the patients' age, sex, and individual comorbidity profiles. The defined primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), major adverse events (MAE), thromboembolic events (TE), and complications of surgery or of trauma. Multivariable p-values for the effect of treatment on all primary endpoints were jointly adjusted using the Bonferroni-Holm method.

RESULTS

Of 81 909 patients, 54% were treated conservatively. Conservative treatment was more common in those who received their diagnosis as outpatients (79.5%, vs. 37.2% for inpatients). Operative treatment was associated with significantly longer overall survival (long-term hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [0.86; 0.91]), fewer MAE (0.90 [0.88; 0.92]), and fewer TE (0.89 [0.87; 0.92]), but more complications due to surgery or trauma (1.66 [1,.4; 1.78]; all p < 0.001). By 6 months after diagnosis, 3.1% of the patients who were initially treated conservatively had undergone surgery. Risk factors for failure of conservative treatment were alcohol abuse, obesity, cancer, diabetes mellitus, Parkinson disease, and osteoporosis.

CONCLUSION

The conservative treatment of PHF is associated with a lower overall rate of complications due to surgery or trauma, but also with more MAE, more TE, and higher mortality. These findings underline the need for individualized and risk-adjusted treatment recommendations.

Clinical outcomes of conservative versus surgical treatment for patients with proximal humeral fracture before physiotherapy

Fear of movement, pain, and loss of shoulder function are the most common problems irrespective of their approach to management after proximal humeral fracture (PHF). However, it has been unclear whether there could be differences between both treatments in early clinical outcomes. It can help physiotherapists to guide in choosing treatment approaches. This study aimed to compare kinesiophobia, pain, range of motion (ROM), shoulder function, and Quality of life (QoL) in patients treated with either conservative (CT) versus surgical (ST) after PHF. In addition, it aimed to determine correlations between fear of movement and seconder outcome measures. This cross-sectional study enrolled the patients having 5-6 weeks (being permitted active movement) after being treated either CT or ST and receiving no physical therapy. Pain, passive and active ROMs, shoulder function, fear of movement, and QoL were evaluated. 42 patients were recruited. Kinesiophobia scores were similar (p=0.55) and moderate in both groups. There was a significant difference in degrees of shoulder active flexion, active and passive abduction in favor of the CT group (p=0.05, p=0.02, p=0.04, respectively). However, there was no difference between groups regarding the remaining clinical outcomes. Furthermore, kinesiophobia showed a moderate negative correlation with energy/fatigue, social functioning, and general health. These findings showed that patients treated surgically did not have more kinesiophobia, less function, and QoL before starting physiotherapy, despite having soft tissue damage and different types of fractures. However, surgically treated patients had significantly less range of motion.

Study on proximal humerus evaluation of effective treatment (SPHEER) - what is the effect of rehabilitation compliance on clinical outcomes of proximal humerus fractures

INTRODUCTION

Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are 3rd commonest fragility fractures and cause significant functional impairment. This paper sought to determine impact of rehabilitation compliance on the clinical outcomes for non-surgically managed PHFs, while ascertaining reasons for non-compliance which can be addressed to improve compliance.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of patients undergoing non-surgical treatment for PHFs from August 2017 to April 2020 in a tertiary trauma centre was performed. Data was collected via questionnaire: patient demographic data, PHF injury details, clinical outcome measures, therapist-reported (Sport Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale [SIRAS]) and patient-reported (subjective compliance, frequency of exercise) rehabilitation compliance measures. Data was analysed using multiple linear regression model to account for confounding variables.

RESULTS

107 participants attended physical therapy follow-up for mean 137.8 days. 6-week SIRAS strongly predicted 3-month Constant score (p = 0.023; 95%CI = 0.265,3.423), OSS (p = 0.038; 95%CI = 0.049,1.634), flexion ROM (p < 0.001; 95%CI = 2.872,8.982), extension ROM (p = 0.035; 95%CI = 0.097,2.614), abduction ROM (p = 0.002;95%CI = 1.995,8.466) and achievement of functional active ROM at 3-months (p = 0.049; 95%CI = 1.001,1.638). Pain was the top reason impairing rehabilitation compliance from therapist (43.9% at 6-weeks and 20.6% at 3-months) and patient-perspective (33.6% at 6-weeks, 24.3% at 3-months). Author-developed patient-reported compliance measures had good correlation with validated SIRAS score (subjective compliance: p < 0.001 frequency of exercise: p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Rehabilitation compliance predicts short-term clinical outcomes up to 3-months and potentially 1-year outcomes. Pain control should be optimised to maximise rehabilitation compliance and improve PHF outcomes. There is lack of consensus definition for rehabilitation compliance measures; patient-reported measures used have good correlation to existing validated measures and could serve as a steppingstone for further research.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, cohort study.

Rehabilitation following proximal humeral fracture in the UK National Health Service: A survey of publicly facing information

INTRODUCTION

Proximal humeral fractures (PHF) are a common injury in the older population but there is limited research evaluating rehabilitation following PHF. The aim of this study was to understand current National Health Service (NHS) practice for rehabilitation following PHF as a platform for conducting future research.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently undertook electronic searches for publicly available information sheets (PIS) from websites of NHS Trusts that included detail about rehabilitation following PHF, for example, duration of immobilisation. One reviewer extracted data and a second reviewer verified this.

RESULTS

Seventeen PIS from 17 different NHS trusts were identified. All provided some information on the method of immobilisation but only six provided guidance on duration of immobilisation with the median time being 2 weeks (range 0-6). The median time to commencement of passive exercise was 2 weeks (range 0-4) and 9 weeks (range 6-12) for active exercise. Only one PIS reported on the time for commencement of resisted exercises and this was reported as 6 weeks. The median time recommended return to work was 7.5 weeks (range 6-12).

CONCLUSION

This study found limited publicly available information for rehabilitation following PHF in the NHS but offers some insight into current approaches. Our results will facilitate development of relevant information for patients and evaluation of rehabilitation strategies in future research.

Trends in the Characterization of the Proximal Humerus in Biomechanical Studies: A Review

Proximal humerus fractures are becoming more common due to the aging of the population, and more related scientific research is also emerging. Biomechanical studies attempt to optimize treatments, taking into consideration the factors involved, to obtain the best possible treatment scenario. To achieve this, the use of finite element analysis (FEA) is necessary, to experiment with situations that are difficult to replicate, and which are sometimes unethical. Furthermore, low costs and time requirements make FEA the perfect choice for biomechanical studies. Part of the complete process of an FEA involves three-dimensional (3D) bone modeling, mechanical properties assignment, and meshing the bone model to be analyzed. Due to the lack of standardization for bone modeling, properties assignment, and the meshing processes, this article aims to review the most widely used techniques to model the proximal humerus bone, according to its anatomy, for FEA. This study also seeks to understand the knowledge and bias behind mechanical properties assignment for bone, and the similarities/differences in mesh properties used in previous FEA studies of the proximal humerus. The best ways to achieve these processes, according to the evidence, will be analyzed and discussed, seeking to obtain the most accurate results for FEA simulations.