Benefit on optimal cerebral perfusion pressure targeted treatment for traumatic brain injury patients

Cerebrovascular reactivity (PRx) and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in elderly with traumatic brain injury

PURPOSE

Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) guidance by cerebral pressure autoregulation (CPA) status according to PRx (correlation mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and intracranial pressure (ICP)) and optimal CPP (CPPopt = CPP with lowest PRx) is promising but little is known regarding this approach in elderly. The aim was to analyze PRx and CPPopt in elderly TBI patients.

METHODS

A total of 129 old (≥ 65 years) and 342 young (16-64 years) patients were studied using monitoring data for MAP and ICP. CPP, PRx, CPPopt, and ΔCPPopt (difference between actual CPP and CPPopt) were calculated. Logistic regression analyses with PRx and ΔCPPopt as explanatory variables for outcome. The combined effects of PRx/CPP and PRx/ΔCPPopt on outcome were visualized as heatmaps.

RESULTS

The elderly had higher PRx (worse CPA), higher CPPopt, and different temporal patterns. High PRx influenced outcome negatively in the elderly but less so than in younger patients. CPP close to CPPopt correlated to favorable outcome in younger, in contrast to elderly patients. Heatmap interaction analysis of PRx/ΔCPPopt in the elderly showed that the region for favorable outcome was centered around PRx 0 and ranging between both functioning and impaired CPA (PRx range - 0.5-0.5), and the center of ΔCPPopt was - 10 (range - 20-0), while in younger the center of PRx was around - 0.5 and ΔCPPopt closer to zero.

CONCLUSIONS

The elderly exhibit higher PRx and CPPopt. High PRx influences outcome negatively in the elderly but less than in younger patients. The elderly do not show better outcome when CPP is close to CPPopt in contrast to younger patients.

Lung Injury Risk in Traumatic Brain Injury Managed With Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Guided-Therapy

Introduction

Management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) has to counterbalance prevention of secondary brain injury without systemic complications, namely lung injury. The potential risk of developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) leads to therapeutic decisions such as fluid balance restriction, high PEEP and other lung protective measures, that may conflict with neurologic outcome. In fact, low cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) may induce secondary ischemic injury and mortality, but disproportionate high CPP may also increase morbidity and worse lung compliance and hypoxia with the risk of developing ARDS and fatal outcome. The evaluation of cerebral autoregulation at bedside and individualized (optimal CPP) CPPopt-guided therapy, may not only be a relevant measure to protect the brain, but also a safe measure to avoid systemic complications.

Aim of the study

We aimed to study the safety of CPPopt-guided-therapy and the risk of secondary lung injury association with bad outcome.

Methods and results

Single-center retrospective analysis of 92 severe TBI patients admitted to the Neurocritical Care Unit managed with CPPopt-guided-therapy by PRx (pressure reactivity index). During the first 10 days, we collected data from blood gas, ventilation and brain variables. Evolution along time was analyzed using linear mixed-effects regression models. 86% were male with mean age 53±21 years. 49% presented multiple trauma and 21% thoracic trauma. At hospital admission, median GCS was 7 and after 3-months GOS was 3. Monitoring data was CPP 86±7mmHg, CPP-CPPopt -2.8±10.2mmHg and PRx 0.03±0.19. The average PFratio (PaO2/FiO2) was 305±88 and driving pressure 15.9±3.5cmH2O. PFratio exhibited a significant quadratic dependence across time and PRx and driving pressure presented significant negative association with PFRatio. CPP and CPPopt did not present significant effect on PFratio (p=0.533; p=0.556). A significant positive association between outcome and the difference CPP-CPPopt was found.

Conclusion

Management of TBI using CPPopt-guided-therapy was associated with better outcome and seems to be safe regarding the development of secondary lung injury.

Multimodal Assessment of Cerebral Autoregulation and Autonomic Function After Pediatric Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformation Rupture

BACKGROUND

Management after cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) rupture aims toward preventing hemorrhagic expansion while maintaining cerebral perfusion to avoid secondary injury. We investigated associations of model-based indices of cerebral autoregulation (CA) and autonomic function (AF) with outcomes after pediatric cerebral AVM rupture.

METHODS

Multimodal neurologic monitoring data from the initial 3 days after cerebral AVM rupture were retrospectively analyzed in children (< 18 years). AF indices included standard deviation of heart rate (HRsd), root-mean-square of successive differences in heart rate (HRrmssd), low-high frequency ratio (LHF), and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). CA indices include pressure reactivity index (PRx), wavelet pressure reactivity indices (wPRx and wPRx-thr), pulse amplitude index (PAx), and correlation coefficient between intracranial pressure pulse amplitude and cerebral perfusion pressure (RAC). Percent time of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) below lower limits of autoregulation (LLA) was also computed for each CA index. Primary outcomes were determined using Pediatric Glasgow Outcome Score Extended-Pediatrics (GOSE-PEDs) at 12 months and acquired epilepsy. Association of biomarkers with outcomes was investigated using linear regression, Wilcoxon signed-rank, or Chi-square.

RESULTS

Fourteen children were analyzed. Lower AF indices were associated with poor outcomes (BRS [p = 0.04], HRsd [p = 0.04], and HRrmssd [p = 0.00]; and acquired epilepsy (LHF [p = 0.027]). Higher CA indices were associated with poor outcomes (PRx [p = 0.00], wPRx [p = 0.00], and wPRx-thr [p = 0.01]), and acquired epilepsy (PRx [p = 0.02] and wPRx [p = 0.00]). Increased time below LLA was associated with poor outcome (percent time below LLA based on PRx [p = 0.00], PAx [p = 0.04], wPRx-thr [p = 0.03], and RAC [p = 0.01]; and acquired epilepsy (PRx [p = 0.00], PAx [p = 0.00], wPRx-thr [p = 0.03], and RAC [p = 0.01]).

CONCLUSIONS

After pediatric cerebral AVM rupture, poor outcomes are associated with AF and CA when applying various neurophysiologic model-based indices. Prospective work is needed to assess these indices of CA and AF in clinical decision support.

Comparative Study of Novel Noninvasive Cerebral Autoregulation Volumetric Reactivity Indices Reflected by Ultrasonic Speed and Attenuation as Dynamic Measurements in the Human Brain

This is a comparative study of two novel noninvasive cerebrovascular autoregulation (CA) monitoring methods based on intracranial blood volume (IBV) changes in the human brain. We investigated the clinical applicability of the new volumetric reactivity index (VRx2), reflected by intracranial ultrasonic attenuation dynamics for noninvasive CA monitoring. The CA was determined noninvasively on 43 healthy participants by calculating the volumetric reactivity index (VRx1 from time-of-flight of ultrasound, VRx2 from attenuation of ultrasound). The VRx was calculated as a moving correlation coefficient between the arterial blood pressure and noninvasively measured IBV slow waves. Linear regression between VRx1 and VRx2 (averaged per participants) showed a significant correlation (r = 0.731, p < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval [0.501–0.895]) in data filtered by bandpass filtering. On the other hand, FIR filtering demonstrated a slightly better correlation (r = 0.769, p < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval [0.611–0.909]). The standard deviation of the difference by bandpass filtering was 0.1647 and bias −0.3444; and by FIR filtering 0.1382 and bias −0.3669. This comparative study showed a significant coincidence of the VRx2 index compared to that of VRx1. Hence, VRx2 could be used as an alternative, cost-effective noninvasive cerebrovascular autoregulation index in the same way as VRx1 values are used.

Association Between the Cerebral Autoregulation Index (Pressure Reactivity), Patient's Clinical Outcome, and Quality of ABP(t) and ICP(t) Signals for CA Monitoring

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the association between the cerebral autoregulation (CA) index, the pressure reactivity index (PRx), the patient’s clinical outcome, and the quality of arterial blood pressure (ABP(t)) and intracranial blood pressure (ICP(t)) signals by comparing two filtering methods to derive the PRx. Materials and Methods: Data from 60 traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients were collected. Moving averaging and FIR (Finite Impulse Response) filtering were performed on the ABP(t) and ICP(t) signals, and the PRx was estimated from both filtered datasets. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves with the area under the curves (AUCs) were determined using patient outcomes as a reference. The outcome chosen for comparison among the two filtering methods were mortality and survival. Results: The FIR filtering approach, compared with clinical outcome, had a sensitivity of 70%, a specificity of 81%, and a level of significance p = 0.001 with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.78. The moving average filtering method compared with the clinical outcome had a sensitivity of 58%, a specificity of 72%, and a level of significance p = 0.054, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66. Conclusions: The FIR (optimal) filtering approach was found to be more sensitive for discriminating between two clinical outcomes, namely intact (survival) and impaired (death) cerebral autoregulation for TBI treatment decision making.

Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure: Targeted Treatment for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Identification of individual therapy targets is critical for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Clinical outcomes depend on cerebrovascular autoregulation (CA) impairment. Here, we compare the effectiveness of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (CPPopt)-targeted therapy in younger (<45 years of age) and elderly (≥45 years of age) TBI patients. Single-center multi-modal invasive arterial blood pressure(t), intracranial pressure (ICP)(t), cerebral perfusion pressure CPP(t), and CPPopt(t) monitoring (n = 81) was performed. ICM+ software was used for continuous CPPopt(t) status assessment by identification of pressure reactivity index (PRx). The most significant prognostic factors were age, Glasgow Coma Scale, serum glucose, and duration of longest CA ompairment event (LCAI) when PRx(t) >0.5 within 24 h after admission. The modeled accuracies for favorable and unfavorable outcome prediction were 86.5% and 90.9%, respectively. Age above 45 years and averaged ICP during all monitoring time above 21.3 mm Hg was associated with unfavorable outcome of an individual patient. Averaged CPP values close to CPPopt were associated with a better outcome in younger patients. Averaged ΔCPPopt <-5.0 mm Hg, averaged PRx >0.36, and LCAI >100 min were significantly associated with mortality for the younger patients. The critical values of averaged PRx >0.26 and LCAI >61 min were significantly associated with mortality for the elderly group. Autoregulation-guided treatment was important for individual TBI management, especially in younger patients. Further randomized multi-center studies are needed to prove final benefit.

Non-invasive Cerebrovascular Autoregulation Assessment Using the Volumetric Reactivity Index: Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

This prospective study of an innovative non-invasive ultrasonic cerebrovascular autoregulation (CA) monitoring method is based on real-time measurements of intracranial blood volume (IBV) reactions following changes in arterial blood pressure. In this study, we aimed to determine the clinical applicability of a non-invasive CA monitoring method by performing a prospective comparative clinical study of simultaneous invasive and non-invasive CA monitoring on intensive care patients.

METHODS

CA was monitored in 61 patients with severe traumatic brain injuries invasively by calculating the pressure reactivity index (PRx) and non-invasively by calculating the volumetric reactivity index (VRx) simultaneously. The PRx was calculated as a moving correlation coefficient between intracranial pressure and arterial blood pressure slow waves. The VRx was calculated as a moving correlation coefficient between arterial blood pressure and non-invasively-measured IBV slow waves.

RESULTS

A linear regression between VRx and PRx averaged per patients' monitoring session showed a significant correlation (r = 0.843, p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval 0.751 - 0.903). The standard deviation of the difference between VRx and PRx was 0.192; bias was - 0.065.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective clinical study of the non-invasive ultrasonic volumetric reactivity index VRx monitoring, based on ultrasonic time-of-flight measurements of IBV dynamics, showed significant coincidence of non-invasive VRx index with invasive PRx index. The ultrasonic time-of-flight method reflects blood volume changes inside the acoustic path, which crosses both hemispheres of the brain. This method does not reflect locally and invasively-recorded intracranial pressure slow waves, but the autoregulatory reactions of both hemispheres of the brain. Therefore, VRx can be used as a non-invasive cerebrovascular autoregulation index in the same way as PRx and can also provide information about the CA status encompassing all intracranial hemodynamics.

Traumatic brain injured patients: primum non nocere

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains an unfortunately common disease with potentially devastating consequences for patients and their families. However, it is important to remember that it is a spectrum of disease and thus, a one 'treatment fits all' approach is not appropriate to achieve optimal outcomes. This review aims to inform readers about recent updates in prehospital and neurocritical care management of patients with TBI.

RECENT FINDINGS

Prehospital care teams which include a physician may reduce mortality. The commonly held value of SBP more than 90 in TBI is now being challenged. There is increasing evidence that patients do better if managed in specialized neurocritical care or trauma ICU. Repeating computed tomography brain 12 h after initial scan may be of benefit. Elderly patients with TBI appear not to want an operation if it might leave them cognitively impaired.

SUMMARY

Prehospital and neuro ICU management of TBI patients can significantly improve patient outcome. However, it is important to also consider whether these patients would actually want to be treated particularly in the elderly population.

Neuroanesthesiology Update

We provide a synopsis of innovative research, recurring themes, and novel experimental findings pertinent to the care of neurosurgical patients and critically ill patients with neurological diseases. We cover the following broad topics: general neurosurgery, spine surgery, stroke, traumatic brain injury, monitoring, and anesthetic neurotoxicity.

Clinical and Basic Evaluation of the Prognostic Value of Uric Acid in Traumatic Brain Injury

Background: As a major antioxidant in serum, uric acid (UA) was once considered only as the leading cause of gout; however, recent studies have validated its neuroprotective role in ischemic stroke. Because the potential protective effects of UA in traumatic brain injury (TBI) remain largely unknown, this study investigated the role of UA in TBI in both clinical patients and experimental animals. Methods: In TBI patients, serum UA concentrations were measured within 3 days after injury. Clinical outcomes at discharge were classified according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale: good outcome (4-5) and poor outcome (1-3). Risk factors for good outcome were identified via backward logistic regression analysis. For the animal study, a controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury model was established in mice. These mice were given UA at different doses intraperitoneally, and subsequent UA concentrations in mouse serum and brain tissue were determined. Neurological function, oxidative stress, inflammatory response, neuronal maintenance, cerebral blood flow, and lesion size were also assessed. Results: The serum UA level was significantly lower in TBI patients who had a good outcome (P<0.01), and low serum UA was an independent predictor of good outcome after TBI (P<0.01; odds ratio, 0.023; 95% confidence interval, 0.006-0.082). Consistently, decreased levels of serum UA were observed in both TBI patients and CCI animals (P<0.05), whereas the UA concentration was increased in CCI brain tissue (P<0.05). Administration of UA further increased the UA level in brain tissue as compared to that in control animals (P<0.05). Among the different doses administered, 16 mg/kg UA improved sensorimotor functional recovery, spatial learning, and memory in CCI mice (P<0.05). Moreover, oxidative stress and the inflammatory response were inhibited by UA treatment (P<0.05). UA treatment also improved neuronal maintenance and cortical blood flow (P<0.05) but not lesion size (P>0.05). Conclusions: UA acted to attenuate neuronal loss, cerebral perfusion impairment and neurological deficits in TBI mice through suppression of neuronal and vascular oxidative stress. Following TBI, active antioxidant defense in the brain may result in consumption of UA in the serum, and thus, a decreased serum UA level could be predictive of good clinical recovery.