Posterior capsule opacification after implantation of CeeOn Edge 911A, PhacoFlex SI-40NB, and AcrySof MA60BM lenses

"Comparing outcomes of advanced nurse practitioners to ophthalmologists performing posterior YAG capsulotomy, a six-year study of 6308 eyes"

PURPOSE

To primarily report the baseline characteristics and visual acuity (VA) outcomes of advanced nurse practitioners (ANP) compared to ophthalmologists following YAG posterior capsulotomy (YAGPC). We secondarily looked to characterise the risk factors that lead to a repeated YAGPC.

METHOD

Retrospective consecutive case series of 6,308 eyes attending the Birmingham and Midlands Eye Centre.

RESULTS

ANPs performed 33.1% of YAGPC compared to 66.9% ophthalmologists. Compared to ophthalmologists, ANPs performed YAGPC in lower proportion of patients with ocular co-morbidities (p < 0.001) and had lower proportion of patients requiring further YAGPC compared to ophthalmologists (p < 0.001). Median pre, post-operative and LogMAR gain in VA of 0.48 (IQR 0.30-0.78), 0.18 (IQR 0.10-0.40) and 0.30 (0.08-0.48) LogMAR units, respectively. Multivariate regression showed that ANPs had a significantly lower rate of repeat YAGPC compared to ophthalmologists even when adjusting for age, ethnicity, training grade and ocular co-morbidities. No difference in visual outcomes was found between operator grade and ethnicity on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

YAGPC leads to excellent visual outcomes. ANPs can deliver safe and effective YAGPC.

Intraocular lens optic edge design for the prevention of posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery

BACKGROUND

Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) is a clouding of the posterior part of the lens capsule, a skin-like transparent structure, which surrounds the crystalline lens in the human eye. PCO is the most common postoperative complication following modern cataract surgery with implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL). The main symptoms of PCO are a decrease in visual acuity, 'cloudy', blurred vision and reduced contrast sensitivity. PCO is treated with a neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser to create a small opening in the opaque capsule and regain a clear central visual axis. This capsulotomy might cause further ocular complications, such as raised intraocular pressure or swelling of the central retina (macular oedema). This procedure is also a significant financial burden for health care systems worldwide. In recent decades, there have been advances in the selection of IOL materials and optimisation of IOL designs to help prevent PCO formation after cataract surgery. These include changes to the side structures holding the lens in the centre of the lens capsule bag, called IOL haptics, and IOL optic edge designs.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of different IOL optic edge designs on PCO after cataract surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS), the ISRCTN registry, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) up to 17 November 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different types of IOL optic edge design. Our prespecified primary outcome was the proportion of eyes with Nd:YAG capsulotomy one year after surgery. Secondary outcomes included PCO score, best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) and quality of life score at one year. Due to availability of important long-term data, we also presented data at longer-term follow-up which is a post hoc change to our protocol.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methods expected by Cochrane and the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 studies (1065 people, 1834 eyes) that compared sharp- and round-edged IOLs. Eight of these studies were within-person studies whereby one eye received a sharp-edged IOL and the fellow eye a round-edged IOL. The IOL materials were acrylic (2 studies), silicone (4 studies), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA, 3 studies) and different materials (1 study). The studies were conducted in Austria, Germany, India, Japan, Sweden and the UK. Five studies were at high risk of bias in at least one domain. We judged two studies to be at low risk of bias in all domains. There were few cases of Nd:YAG capsulotomy at one year (primary outcome): 1/371 in sharp-edged and 4/371 in round-edged groups. The effect estimate was in favour of sharp-edged IOLs but the confidence intervals were very wide and compatible with higher or lower chance of Nd:YAG capsulotomy in sharp-edged compared with round-edged lenses (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.30, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.74; I² = 0%; 6 studies, 742 eyes). This corresponds to seven fewer cases of Nd:YAG capsulotomy per 1000 sharp-edged IOLs inserted compared with round-edged IOLs (95% CI 9 fewer to 7 more). We judged this as low-certainty evidence, downgrading for imprecision and risk of bias. A similar reduced risk of Nd:YAG capsulotomy in sharp-edge compared with round-edge IOLs was seen at two, three and five years but as the number of Nd:YAG capsulotomy events increased with longer follow-up this effect was more precisely measured at longer follow-up: two years, risk ratio (RR) 0.35 (0.16 to 0.80); 703 eyes (6 studies); 89 fewer cases per 1000; three years, RR 0.21 (0.11 to 0.41); 538 eyes (6 studies); 170 fewer cases per 1000; five years, RR 0.21 (0.10 to 0.45); 306 eyes (4 studies); 331 fewer cases per 1000. Data at 9 years and 12 years were only available from one study. All studies reported a PCO score. Four studies reported the AQUA (Automated Quantification of After-Cataract) score, four studies reported the EPCO (Evaluation of PCO) score and two studies reported another method of quantifying PCO. It was not possible to pool these data due to the way they were reported, but all studies consistently reported a statistically significant lower average PCO score (of the order of 0.5 to 3 units) with sharp-edged IOLs compared with round-edged IOLs. We judged this to be moderate-certainty evidence downgrading for risk of bias. The logMAR visual acuity score was lower (better) in eyes that received a sharp-edged IOL but the difference was small and likely to be clinically unimportant at one year (mean difference (MD) -0.06 logMAR, 95% CI -0.12 to 0; 2 studies, 153 eyes; low-certainty evidence). Similar effects were seen at longer follow-up periods but non-statistically significant data were less fully reported: two years MD -0.01 logMAR (-0.05 to 0.02); 2 studies, 311 eyes; three years MD -0.09 logMAR (-0.22 to 0.03); 2 studies, 117 eyes; data at five years only available from one study. None of the studies reported quality of life. Very low-certainty evidence on adverse events did not suggest any important differences between the groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review provides evidence that sharp-edged IOLs are likely to be associated with less PCO formation than round-edged IOLs, with less Nd:YAG capsulotomy. The effects on visual acuity were less certain. The impact of these lenses on quality of life has not been assessed and there are only very low-certainty comparative data on adverse events.

An in vitro system to investigate IOL: Lens capsule interaction

Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) is the most common complication associated with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Unfortunately, current in vitro models cannot be used to assess the potential of PCO due to their failure to simulate the posterior curvature of the lens capsule (LC) and IOL, a factor known to affect PCO pathogenesis in clinic. To overcome such a challenge, a new system to study IOL: LC interaction and potentially predict PCO was developed in this effort. It is believed that the interactions between an IOL and the lens capsule may influence the extent of PCO formation. Specifically, strong adhesion force between an IOL and the LC may impede lens epithelial cell migration and proliferation and thus reduce PCO formation. To assess the adhesion force between an IOL and LC, a new in vitro model was established with simulated LC and a custom-designed micro-force tester. A method to fabricate simulated LCs was developed by imprinting IOLs onto molten gelatin to create simulated three dimensional (3D) LCs with curvature resembling the bag-like structure that collapses on the IOL post implantation. By pushing the LC mold vertically downward, while measuring the change in position of the bending bar with respect to its start position, the adhesion force between the IOLs and LCs was measured. An in vitro system that can measure the adhesion force reproducibly between an IOL and LC with a resolution of ~1 μN was established in this study. During system optimization, the 10% high molecular weight gelatin produced the best LC with the highest IOL: LC adhesion force with all test lenses that were fabricated from acrylic foldable, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and silicone materials. Test IOLs exerted different adhesion force with the 3D simulated LCs in the following sequence: acrylic foldable IOL > silicone IOL > PMMA IOL. These results are in good agreement with the clinical observations associated with PCO performance of IOLs made of the same materials. This novel in vitro system can provide valuable insight on the IOL: LC interplay and its relationship to clinical PCO outcomes.

Evaluation of Nd:YAG Laser Capsulotomy Rates in a Real-Life Population

Objective

The objective of this study was to assess the rate of posterior capsule opacification (PCO), under “real-life” conditions, as measured by rates of Nd:YAG laser intervention, rather than from a controlled study from which patients with conditions predisposing to PCO have been excluded.

Methods and Analysis

This was a retrospective, multicenter study in an unselected consecutive cohort of patients undergoing surgery for senile cataract. Patients aged 18 years and older, previously implanted with the CT LUCIA 611P IOL, were contacted at 12, 18 and 24 months to ascertain if they had received Nd:YAG laser treatment. There was an additional assessment at 36 months at the Austrian centre.

Results

A total of 200 patients were recruited at two centers. Laser capsulotomy rates were 4.5% at 1 year and 10% by year 2 and 12% by year 3. Three Nd:YAG capsulotomies, carried out at other external centers, were performed for reasons other than PCO, including astigmatism, epiretinal membrane and ARMD. If these patients are excluded, the true rate of Nd:YAG carried out for PCO at 1 year was 3.5% and at 2 years was 8.5%.

Conclusion

It is critical to ensure that Nd:YAG capsulotomies are being performed only for the correct clinical reason. Carrying out unnecessary procedures places the patient at risk of adverse events, is a cost to the healthcare system, and is likely to have no direct visual benefit for the patient. In PCO studies, it should be a requirement to document the fibrosis grade to confirm that Nd:YAG capsulotomy was correctly indicated.

Intraindividual comparison of capsule behavior of 2 hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses during a 5-year follow-up

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the 5-year postoperative anterior (ACO) and posterior capsule opacification (PCO), the occurrence of glistenings, and the level of anterior capsule retraction after implantation of 2 designs of 1-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOLs.

SETTING

Hospital St. John, Vienna, Austria.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled prospective case series.

METHODS

Patients had an Acrysof SA60AT IOL (Group A) implanted in 1 eye and a Tecnis ZCB00 IOL (Group B) implanted in the fellow eye. At 1, 3, and 5 years, the PCO level was evaluated with the Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification software. The level of ACO and capsule retraction was graded subjectively. Glistenings were scored as present or not present.

RESULTS

Fifty eyes of 25 patients were evaluated after 5 years. No significant differences in PCO scores were found between the 2 groups at all follow-up visits (1 year: 0.06 ± 0.12 [SD] versus 0.07 ± 0.13, P = .35; 3 years: 0.23 ± 0.36 versus 0.22 ± 0.32, P = .66; 5 years: 0.36 ± 0.41 versus 0.36 ± 0.54, P = .98). A significant increase in PCO score was found between 3 and 5 years (P < .01). Anterior capsule opacification was present in Group A and Group B in 18.0% and 2.7% of eyes (P = .03), in 92.0% and 24.0% of eyes, and in 100% and 52% of eyes (P < .01) at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Glistenings (5 years 100%) were observed in Group A.

CONCLUSION

Both IOLs had a comparable PCO rate 5 years after surgery, although more ACO and retraction as well as glistenings were observed in Group A.

A meta-analysis of Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates for two hydrophobic intraocular lens materials

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to estimate and compare neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy rates for AcrySof ^® and Clareon^® intraocular lens (IOL) materials using historical data from the medical literature and Alcon-sponsored clinical studies.

Methods

Clinical trials that involved the implantation of AcrySof or Clareon monofocal IOLs in subjects with cataract or presbyopia were extracted from the literature and a company repository of clinical studies. The study duration, number of eyes, and cumulative percent of Nd:YAGs for posterior capsule opacification were extracted. Bayesian random effects meta-analyses were conducted to estimate and compare outcomes for the 2 different IOL materials.

Results

A Bayesian random effects, meta-analysis was performed that combined a literature review of published AcrySof Nd:YAG posterior capsulotomy rates and Nd:YAG rates observed in Alcon-sponsored clinical studies of AcrySof and Clareon. Sixteen Alcon studies contained Nd:YAG data suitable for meta-analysis. Three of these Alcon studies contained results for the Clareon material (2 one-year studies, and 1 three-year study). The literature review included 50 papers from 1998 to 2015. In combination, 30,891 eyes were available for analysis and 2040 Nd:YAG procedures were reported in studies with a follow-up duration ranging in length from 4 months to 10 years. The overall probability of performing a Nd:YAG capsulotomy within a year of implant for AcrySof was 1.44% (1.11% to 1.83%) and 0.62% (0.21% to 1.38%) for Clareon. There was small improvement in the probability of Nd:YAG within a year of implant for Clareon lenses of about 0.82% with a 95% credible interval of (0.07% to 1.36%) at 1 year. Results were similar for incidence rates per 100 surgeries in a year: 0.62 (0.21 to 1.40) for Clareon, 1.46 (1.12 to 1.87) for AcrySof, and the difference was 0.84 (0.07 to 1.39) favoring Clareon. At 3 years, the overall probability of performing a Nd:YAG capsulotomy for AcrySof was 4.19% (3.24% to 5.30%) compared with only 1.82% (0.63% to 4.02%) for Clareon.

Conclusion

A meta-analysis of Clareon multi-piece and single-piece clinical data predicts that the cumulative Clareon Nd:YAG probability will be ≤ AcrySof by 2.37% (0.18% to 3.91%) at 3 years. The results indicate that Clareon is likely to perform as well as, and possibly better than, AcrySof in terms of Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates.

Glistenings, anterior/posterior capsular opacification and incidence of Nd:YAG laser treatments with two aspheric hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses - a long-term intra-individual study

PURPOSE

To compare two hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) regarding long-term anterior/posterior capsular opacification (ACO/PCO) development and need for neodymium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Nd:YAG) laser treatment due to visually disturbing PCO, and to study development of glistenings in the IOL materials.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, intra-individual, comparative trial, 50 cataract patients received either an AcrySof IQ^® SN60WF (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA) or a Tecnis^® ZCB00 (Abbott Medical Optics, Santa Ana, CA, USA) IOL in the first operated eye, and the second eye received the IOL type not implanted in the first eye. Anterior/posterior capsular opacification (ACO/PCO) and fibrosis were monitored with slit-lamp photography and semi-automated digital analysis 2 and 3 years postoperatively. Glistenings were semi-quantitatively assessed in slit-lamp photographs. Nd:YAG laser treatment for visually disturbing PCO was monitored.

RESULTS

Visual outcomes were similar for the two IOLs. Anterior capsular fibrosis and/or opacification developed more often in SN60WF eyes. Mean PCO area percentage was larger in ZCB00 eyes 3 years after surgery, but severity score did not differ with statistical significance between the two IOLs. Six ZCB00 eyes and 2 SN60WF eyes underwent Nd:YAG laser treatment during a mean of 4 years 8 months after surgery. This difference was not statistically significant. A high amount of glistenings developed in most SN60WF IOLs, while only few ZCB00 IOLs displayed a low degree of glistenings.

CONCLUSION

Visual outcomes, PCO development over time and need for Nd:YAG laser treatment were similar for the two IOLs. Anterior capsule fibrosis/contraction and glistenings were more pronounced with the SN60WF IOL.

Long-term follow-up of posterior capsule opacification after AquaLase and NeoSoniX phacoemulsification

AIM

To compare the degree of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after AquaLase and NeoSoniX phacoemulsification methods during an 8-year follow-up period using two types of software.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

AquaLase was used in the right eye and NeoSoniX in the left eye of each patient with bilateral cataract.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were analyzed 1 year, 46 patients 3 years, and 37 patients 8 years after cataract surgery. Mean EPCO 2000 values were for the AquaLase group 0.324 ± 0.305 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.298 ± 0.341 (P = 0.53) 1 year after surgery, for the AquaLase group 0.582 ± 0.506 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.594 ± 0.515 (P = 0.87) 3 years after surgery, and for the AquaLase group 0.648 ± 0.567 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.673 ± 0.542 (P = 0.30) 8 years after surgery. The OSCA results were for the AquaLase group 0.7097 ± 0.3778 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.8584 ± 0.4323 (P = 0.046) 1 year after surgery, for the AquaLase group 0.9667 ± 0.736 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.9540 ± 0.5250 (P = 0.91) 3 years after surgery, and for the AquaLase group 1,035 ± 0,952 and for the NeoSoniX group 1,103 ± 0,741 (P = 0.44) 8 years after surgery.

CONCLUSION

There was minimal PCO difference between these 2 approaches, AquaLase and NeoSoniX. Neither AquaLase nor NeoSoniX technique was able to prevent a natural progression of PCO.

Epidemiological evaluation of YAG capsulotomy incidence for posterior capsule opacification in various intraocular lenses in Japanese eyes

Background and objective

We investigated the yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) capsulotomy rates in various intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Study design/patients and methods

We retrospectively analyzed 23,440 eyes implanted with either MA60BM, MA60AC, VA-60BB, CeeOnEdge, Clariflex, Technis Z9002, SI-40NB, or UV26T IOLs. We calculated the YAG capsulotomy rates at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years post lens implantation.

Results

YAG capsulotomy rates at 3 years postimplantation for the eight groups of IOLs were, respectively, 3.7%, 3.9%, 23.7%, 3.4%, 4.5%, 4.7%, 10.4%, and 21.0%. YAG capsulotomy rates at 10 years postimplantation for the MA60BM and SI-40NB IOLs were, respectively, 9.1% and 15% (P<0.05). The average YAG rates for all sharp-edged and round-edged IOLs at 5 years postimplantation were, respectively, 5.2%±0.7% and 25.6%±9.0% (P<0.05).

Conclusion

In all studied IOLs, posterior capsule opacification prevention seemed to be associated with the posterior optic sharp-edge design. Round-edged silicone IOLs may also retard posterior capsule opacification formation, though not as much as sharp-edged IOLs. As the follow-up period progressed, round-edged silicone IOLs showed significantly higher YAG rates than sharp-edged IOLs.

Prospective Randomized Intraindividual Comparison of Posterior Capsule Opacification After Implantation of an IOL With and Without Heparin Surface Modification

PURPOSE

To compare posterior capsule opacification (PCO) of a hydrophobic acrylic heparin surface modified intraocular lens (HSM-IOL) and an uncoated IOL (UC-IOL) 1 year after implantation.

METHODS

One hundred two eyes of 51 patients underwent routine phacoemulsification with randomized implantation of a HSM-IOL in one eye (the HSM-IOL group) and a UC-IOL in the fellow eye (the UC-IOL group). Morphologic PCO evaluation was performed comparing digital photographs in retroillumination using the Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification (EPCO) system, grading the density of the opacification from 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe). Distance visual acuities, subjective manifest refraction, pupil size, straylight measurements, flare in the anterior chamber using a laser flare meter, and contrast sensitivity were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean total EPCO score was slightly higher in the HSM-IOL group (0.50 ± 0.45) compared to the UC-IOL group (0.45 ± 0.46), but did not reach statistical significance. No statistically significant differences were found in the other main outcome parameters (straylight measurement, distance visual acuities, flare in the anterior chamber, and mesopic and photopic contrast sensitivity) when comparing both IOLs.

CONCLUSION

Although the HSM-IOL showed decreased flare 1 day postoperatively, no statistically significant differences regarding PCO were found 1 year postoperatively.

Intraindividual comparative analysis of capsule opacification after implantation of 2 single-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses models: Three-year follow-up

PURPOSE

To compare the 3-year postoperative anterior (ACO) and posterior (PCO) capsule opacification and the level of anterior capsule retraction after implantation of 2 single-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) models.

SETTING

Hospital of St. John of God, Vienna, Austria.

DESIGN

Comparative randomized controlled double-blind clinical trial.

METHODS

Eyes with bilateral cataract were evaluated. Each patient had an Acrysof SA60AT (interrupted optic edge) IOL implanted in 1 eye (Group A) and a Tecnis ZCB00 (continuous optic edge) IOL implanted in the fellow eye (Group B). One and 3 years postoperatively, PCO was evaluated using Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification software and the ACO level and capsule-retraction level were evaluated and graded subjectively.

RESULTS

The study evaluated 100 eyes of 50 patients ranging from 61 to 80 years. Postoperatively, there were no statistically significant differences in PCO between Group A and Group B at 1 year (0.06 ± 0.12 [SD] and 0.07 ± 0.13, respectively; P = 4.35) or 3 years (0.23 ± 0.36 and 0.22 ± 0.32, respectively; P = .66). In Group A and Group B, ACO was present in 18.0% of eyes and 2.7% of eyes, respectively, at 1 year (P = .03) and in 92.0% and 24.0%, respectively, at 3 years (P < .01). Capsule phimosis (18.0% at 1 year; 30.0% at 3 years) and glistenings (66.0% at 1 year; 86.0% at 3 years) were observed in Group A only.

CONCLUSION

Both IOLs had similarly low PCO rates 3 years postoperatively, although more ACO and capsule retraction were observed in eyes with the interrupted optic edge IOL.

Posterior capsule opacification with 3 intraocular lenses: 12-year prospective study

PURPOSE

To compare posterior capsule opacification (PCO) with 3 intraocular lenses (IOLs) 12 years postoperatively.

SETTING

St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

DESIGN

Randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

Patients having unilateral standard phacoemulsification were randomized to implantation of a round-edged heparin-surface-modified (HSM) poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) IOL, a round-edged silicone IOL, or a sharp-edged hydrophobic acrylic IOL. The neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy rates and timing from surgery were recorded. Survival analysis was used to compare Nd:YAG rates. Retroillumination images were taken to evaluate PCO.

RESULTS

After 12 years, there was no significant difference in the fraction or severity of PCO between the silicone IOL and acrylic IOL. The HSM PMMA IOL had a significantly higher PCO fraction than the silicone IOL (P<.05), but not more than the acrylic IOL. There was no difference in PCO severity between the HSM PMMA IOL and the other 2 IOLs. The silicone IOL had higher median capsulotomy-free survival (>150 months) than the acrylic IOL (108 months) and the HSM PMMA IOL (53 months). Overall survival without Nd:YAG capsulotomy did not differ between the acrylic and silicone IOLs or between the silicone and HSM PMMA IOLs; however, overall survival was significantly better with the acrylic IOL than with the HSM PMMA IOL (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

After 12 years, there was no difference in PCO or overall survival without capsulotomy between the acrylic IOL and the silicone IOL. The HSM PMMA IOL had a significantly higher PCO fraction than the silicone IOL and lower overall survival than the acrylic IOL.

Pathology of 157 human cadaver eyes with round-edged or modern square-edged silicone intraocular lenses: analyses of capsule bag opacification

PURPOSE

To assess the degree of capsular bag opacification in human cadaver eyes with silicone intraocular lenses (IOLs), specifically comparing the differences between round-edged IOLs and modern square-edged IOLs.

SETTING

John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, USA.

DESIGN

Experimental study.

METHODS

The eyes were immersed in 10% formalin on enucleation. They had anterior segment scanning with a very-high-frequency ultrasound (Artemis). After the eyes were sectioned at the equator, gross examination of the anterior segment was performed from the posterior aspect to assess the degree of capsular bag opacification, coverage of the IOL edge by the anterior capsule, and IOL fixation. Selected eyes also had histopathologic examination.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven eyes with a 3-piece round-edged IOL, 43 with a 3-piece square-edged IOL, 26 with a 1-piece plate IOL, and 1 with an accommodating IOL design were included in the analyses of capsular bag opacification. Comparison between 3-piece round-edged IOLs and square-edged IOLs showed statistically significant differences in central posterior capsule opacification (PCO) (P=.0001687) and peripheral PCO (P<.0001). In eyes with square-edged IOLs, PCO had a tendency to start in areas without capsulorhexis coverage of the optic. Twenty-one of 26 eyes with a silicone plate IOL had a neodymium:YAG posterior capsulotomy for dense PCO.

CONCLUSIONS

This first study using pseudophakic human cadaver eyes that includes a significant number of modern 3-piece silicone IOLs with square optic edges confirmed the role of this design in the prevention of PCO.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Interventions for preventing posterior capsule opacification

BACKGROUND

Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) remains the most common long-term complication after cataract surgery. It can be treated by Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy, however this may lead to other complications and laser treatment is not available in large parts of the developing world. Therefore, many studies try to find factors influencing the development of PCO.

OBJECTIVES

To summarise the effects of different interventions to inhibit PCO. These include modifications of surgical technique and intraocular lens (IOL) design, implantation of additional devices and pharmacological interventions.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS in March 2009 and reference lists of identified trial reports.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only prospective, randomised and controlled trials with a follow-up time of at least 12 months. Interventions included modifications in surgical technique explicitly to inhibit PCO, modifications in IOL design (material and geometry), implantation of additional devices and pharmacological therapy compared to each other, placebo or standard treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data and entered it into RevMan. We compared visual acuity data, PCO scores and YAG capsulotomy rates and performed a meta-analysis when possible.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty six studies were included in the review. The review was divided into three parts. 1. Influence of IOL optic material on the development of PCO. There was no significant difference in PCO development between the different IOL materials (PMMA, hydrogel, hydrophobic acrylic, silicone) although hydrogel IOLs tend to have higher PCO scores and silicone IOLs lower PCO scores than the other materials. 2. Influence of IOL optic design on the development of PCO. There was a significantly lower PCO score (-8.65 (-10.72 to -6.59), scale 0 to 100) and YAG rate (0.19 (0.11 to 0.35)) in sharp edged than in round edged IOLs, however not between 1-piece and 3-piece IOLs. 3. Influence of surgical technique and drugs on the development of PCO. There was no significant difference between different types of intraoperative/postoperative anti-inflammatory treatment except for treatment with an immunotoxin (MDX-A) which led to a significantly lower PCO rate.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Due to the highly significant difference between round and sharp edged IOL optics, IOLs with sharp (posterior) optic edges should be preferred. There is no clear difference between optic materials. The choice of postoperative anti-inflammatory treatment does not seem to influence PCO development.

Comparison of posterior capsule opacification development with 3 intraocular lens types: five-year prospective study

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of hydrophobic acrylic, silicone, and heparin-surface-modified poly(methyl methacrylate) (HSM PMMA) intraocular lenses (IOLs) on posterior capsule opacification (PCO).

METHODS

In this 5-year prospective study, the same surgeon performed standard phacoemulsification in patients who were randomized to implantation of a round-edged HSM PMMA IOL (809C), a round-edged silicone IOL (SI-40NB), or a sharp-edged hydrophobic acrylic IOL (AcrySof MA60BM). The neodymium:YAG capsulotomy rate was recorded. To evaluate PCO and the position of the anterior capsulorhexis, retroillumination digital photographs were taken 5 years postoperatively and analyzed using the POCOman computer-analysis system.

RESULTS

After 5 years, there was no significant difference in the fraction or severity of PCO between the silicone IOLs and acrylic IOLs (both P =1.0). The silicone IOL group had a significantly higher capsulotomy rate (29%) than the acrylic IOL group (8%) (P=.0068). The HSM PMMA IOL group had a significantly higher PCO fraction, severity, and capsulotomy rate (54%) than the silicone and acrylic groups. In all eyes, the fraction (P=.0076) and severity (P=.0081) of PCO were statistically significantly higher when the anterior capsulorhexis was partly decentered than when it was completely on the optic; within each IOL group, there was no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

After 5 years, there was no significant difference in the semiquantitative evaluation of PCO between the sharp-edged acrylic IOL and round-edged silicone IOL. Eyes with the HSM PMMA IOL had more PCO than eyes with the other IOLs.

Three-year follow-up of posterior capsule opacification after AquaLase and NeoSoniX phacoemulsification

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare the degree of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after AquaLase and NeoSoniX phacoemulsification methods during the 3-year follow-up period.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

Setting at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital in Hradec Králové. Patients with bilateral cataract were included. AquaLase was used in the right eye and NeoSoniX in the left eye of each patient. The AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lens (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas, USA) was implanted in all eyes. The Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification (EPCO) 2000 software (Developed by Tetz MR and associates, Berlin, Germany) and the Open-Access Systematic Capsule Assessment (OSCA) system (Devised by Aslam TM, Edinburgh, United Kingdom) were used for PCO assessment 1, 2, and 3 years after cataract surgery.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were analyzed 1 year, 47 patients 2 years, and 46 patients 3 years after cataract surgery. Mean EPCO 2000 values were for the AquaLase group 0.324 +/- 0.305 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.298 +/- 0.341 (P = .53) 1 year after surgery, for the AquaLase group 0.429 +/- 0.322 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.478 +/- 0.337 (P = .30) 2 years after surgery, and for the AquaLase group 0.582 +/- 0.506 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.594 +/- 0.515 (P = .87) 3 years after surgery. The OSCA results were for the AquaLase group 0.7097 +/- 0.3778 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.8584 +/- 0.4323 (P = .046) 1 year after surgery, for the AquaLase group 0.7515 +/- 0.4555 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.8103 +/- 0.4498 (P = .44) 2 years after surgery, and for the AquaLase group 0.9667 +/- 0.736 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.9540 +/- 0.5250 (P = .91) 3 years after surgery. Neodymium-yttrium-aluminun-garnet capsulotomy rate for AquaLase vs NeoSoniX was 0:1 eyes 1 year, 1:3 eyes 2 years, and 1:4 eyes 3 years after surgery. No significant difference between those 2 groups was established, except the OSCA outcomes 1 year postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

There was only minimal PCO difference between these 2 approaches, AquaLase and NeoSoniX. Neither AquaLase nor NeoSoniX technique was able to prevent a natural progression of PCO.

Posterior capsule opacification in silicone and hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses with sharp-edge optics six years after surgery

PURPOSE

To compare posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between 2 three-piece intraocular lenses (IOLs) both with sharp-optic edges and open loop haptics, one made of silicone and the other made of hydrophobic acrylate, 6 years after surgery.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled, patient- and examiner-masked trial with intra-patient comparison.

METHODS

One hundred and six eyes in 53 patients were included initially. Forty-four eyes of 22 patients with age-related bilateral cataract were available for the 6 years follow-up. Each patient had standard cataract surgery and randomly received a silicone (CeeOn 911A; AMO, Santa Ana, California, USA) or hydrophobic acrylic (AcrySof MA60BM; Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas, USA) IOL in the first eye, the other type of IOL in the fellow eye. Follow-up examinations were at 1, 3, and 6 years after surgery. The intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) was assessed using digital retro-illuminated photos and the "automated quantification of after-cataract" (AQUA) software. Neodymium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet-laser capsulotomies (YAG-LC) performed were noted.

RESULTS

Six years after surgery, the AQUA scores were 2.3 +/- 1.4 for the silicone and 3.8 +/- 2.0 for the acrylic IOLs (P = .0016). The acrylic IOL eyes also had a significant increase in AQUA score from the 3-year to the 6-year follow-up. YAG-LC were performed in 2 silicone and 6 acrylic IOLs (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

An angulated three-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL had more PCO 6 years after surgery than a silicone IOL of otherwise similar design. Apart from an optic material effect, differences in haptic design and the degree of optic edge sharpness may play a role.

Effect of intraocular lens design on posterior capsule opacification

Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) remains the most common long-term complication after cataract surgery. Many studies have attempted to identify factors that influence the development of PCO. The aim of this systematic review based on Cochrane methodology was to summarize the effects of intraocular lens (IOL) geometry, including modifications of the IOL optic (especially optic edge design) and haptics, on the development of PCO. Twenty-six prospective randomized controlled trials with a follow-up of at least 12 months were included. In 5 of 7 studies, visual acuity was better in sharp-edged IOLs than in round-edged IOL. The PCO score was significantly lower with sharp-edged IOLs but did not differ significantly between 1-piece and 3-piece open-loop IOLs. Because of the significant difference in the PCO score, sharp-edged IOL optics should be preferred to round-edged IOL optics.

The Relationship between the Adhesion Characteristics of Acrylic Intraocular Lens Materials and Posterior Capsule Opacification

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between the adhesion characteristics of similarly designed hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) and posterior capsule opacification (PCO).

METHODS

Three similarly shaped hydrophobic acrylic IOLs with a sharp-edged optic were used. Adhesive force of IOLs was measured with a tackiness tester. Human lens epithelial cells (LECs) were grown on each IOL for 48 h. LECs were then stained with crystal violet, which served as an index of the amount of cells attached to IOLs. Cellular migration and proliferation assays were performed using chamber inserts containing a collagen membrane. After 96 h of incubation, the collagen membranes were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for analysis. Three similarly shaped IOLs were implanted in rabbits. The eyes were enucleated 3 weeks later and analyzed for PCO area.

RESULTS

Hydrophobic acrylic IOLs were classified into three groups: A (less adhesive), B (moderately) and C (highly). The migration area of LECs on the collagen membrane was 5.65 +/- 4.5% in group A, 2.83 +/- 2.1% in group B, and 1.41 +/- 1.5% in group C, with a significant difference between groups A and C (p < 0.05). The mean percentage area of PCO in the rabbit eye was 19.4 +/- 16.7% in group A, 17.5 +/- 8.5% in group B, and 5.5 +/- 3.8% in group C, with a significant difference between groups A and C (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Adhesive force of hydrophobic acrylic IOLs may play an important role in preventing PCO. Among the similarly shaped hydrophobic acrylic IOLs, IOLs of highly adhesive material inhibited LEC migration and PCO more than IOLs of less adhesive material.

Influence on posterior capsule opacification and visual function of intraocular lens optic material

PURPOSE

To examine the influence of optic material on posterior capsule opacification (PCO) by comparing PCO and visual functions between eyes with an acrylic intraocular lens (IOLs) and those with a silicone IOL of the same optic design and with the same haptics.

DESIGN

Randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

One hundred patients scheduled for phacoemulsification surgery underwent implantation of an acrylic IOL (AMO Sensar; AR40e) in one eye and implantation of a silicone IOL (ClariFlex) of the same optic design and loops in the fellow eye. Eighty-nine patients (89%) remained for analysis. The PCO value was measured using the Scheimpflug videophotography system at one, three, six, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months postoperatively. The incidence of eyes that required a neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy was examined; visual acuity and contrast sensitivity with and without a glare source were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean PCO value did not increase significantly during follow-up in either the acrylic or silicone IOL group. When comparing the groups, no statistically significant difference was found in the PCO or in the incidence of Nd:YAG capsulotomy, although both tended to be slightly better in the silicone group than in the acrylic group. There was also no significant difference between the groups in visual acuity or in photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity with or without glare.

CONCLUSIONS

When acrylic and silicone IOLs are of the same optic design and with the same haptics, the optic material does not influence the development of PCO enough to impair visual function.

Interventions for preventing posterior capsule opacification

BACKGROUND

Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) remains the most common long-term complication after cataract surgery. It can be treated by Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy, however, this may lead to other complications and laser treatment is not available in large parts of the developing world. Therefore, many studies try to find factors influencing the development of PCO.

OBJECTIVES

To summarise the effects of different interventions to inhibit PCO. These include modifications of surgical technique and intraocular lens (IOL) design, implantation of additional devices and pharmacological interventions.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS in January 2007 and reference lists of identified trial reports.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only prospective, randomised and controlled trials with a follow-up time of at least 12 months. Interventions included modifications in surgical technique explicitly to inhibit PCO, modifications in IOL design (material and geometry), implantation of additional devices, and pharmacological therapy, compared to each other, placebo or standard treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted and entered into Review Manager. Visual acuity data, PCO score and YAG capsulotomy rates were compared and a meta-analysis was performed when possible.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty three studies were included in the review. The review was divided into three parts. (1) Influence of IOL optic material on the development of PCO. Compared to other materials, the meta-analysis of the included studies showed a significantly higher PCO score (overall effect: 12.39 (95% confidence interval: 9.82 to 14.95), scale 0 to 100) and YAG rate (odds ratio: 8.37 (3.74 to 20.36)) only in hydrogel IOLs. (2) Influence of IOL optic design on the development of PCO. There was a significantly lower PCO score (-8.65 (-10.72 to -6.59), scale 0 to 100) and YAG rate (0.19 (0.11 to 0.35)) in sharp edged than in round edged IOLs, however, not between 1-piece and 3-piece IOLs. (3) Influence of surgical technique and drugs on the development of PCO. There was no significant difference between different types of intra-/postoperative anti-inflammatory treatment except for treatment with an immunotoxin (MDX-A) leading to a significantly lower PCO rate.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Due to the highly significant difference between round and sharp edge IOL optics, IOLs with sharp (posterior) optic edges should be preferred. There is no clear difference between optic materials, except for hydrogel IOLs, that showed more PCO than the other materials. The choice of postoperative anti-inflammatory treatment does not seem to influence PCO development.

Efficacy of different intraocular lens materials and optic edge designs in preventing posterior capsular opacification: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of different intraocular lens (IOL) materials and optic edge designs in preventing posterior capsular opacification (PCO).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Pertinent studies were selected through an electronic search of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Embase. The randomized controlled trials meeting the predefined criteria were reviewed systematically by meta-analysis. The treatment effects were measured as risk difference, and the pooled estimates were computed according to a random effect model.

RESULTS

In total, 23 randomized controlled trials were included in the present meta-analysis. The pooled risk differences of Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rates were -24% (95% confidence interval [CI], -29% to -20%) comparing acrylic with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) lenses; -9% (95% CI, -17% to -1%) comparing silicone with PMMA lenses; 14% (95% CI, -8% to 36%) comparing hydrogel with PMMA lenses; 4% (95% CI, -2% to 10%) comparing silicone with acrylic lenses; 19% (95% CI, 8% to 30%) comparing hydrogel with acrylic lenses; and 28% (95% CI, 10% to 46%) comparing hydrogel with silicone lenses. The pooled risk differences of PCO rates were -39% (95% CI, -47% to -31%) comparing acrylic with PMMA lenses; -14% (95% CI, -29% to 0%) comparing silicone with acrylic lenses; 56% (95% CI, 36% to 75%) comparing hydrogel with acrylic lenses; and 48% (95% CI, 31% to 64%) comparing hydrogel with silicone lenses. When comparing sharp with rounded-edge designs, pooled risk differences of capsulotomy rates were -47% (95% CI, -77% to -17%) in PMMA lenses, -22% (95% CI, -47% to 2%) in acrylic lenses, and -9% (95% CI, -17% to 0%) in silicone lenses; pooled risk differences of PCO rates were -28% (95% CI, -50% to -7%) in acrylic lenses and -37% (95% CI, -46% to -27%) in silicone lenses.

CONCLUSIONS

The rates of PCO and Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy may be influenced by different IOL biomaterials and optic edge designs. The lenses made by acrylic and silicone and those with sharp optic edges are superior in lowering the rates of PCO and laser capsulotomy.

Influence of 360-degree enhanced optic edge design of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification

PURPOSE

To compare the rate of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) with the single-piece hydrophilic acrylic foldable Rayner Centerflex 570H intraocular lens (IOL), which has a sharp optic edge design excluding the optic-haptic junction, and the Rayner C-flex 570C IOL, which has an improved 360-degree sharp edge.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

METHODS

As part of a multicenter U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) study, 42 patients who had implantation of a C-flex IOL in 1 eye after uneventful phacoemulsification were enrolled. Six and 12 months postoperatively, PCO was evaluated by retroillumination photographs using Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification (EPCO) 2000 image-analysis software. The data were then compared with those in a matched group of patients with a Centerflex IOL who participated in a previous FDA study.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients with the C-flex IOL was 71.5 years +/- 8.2 (SD) There was a statistically significant difference in EPCO scores between the C-flex group and Centerflex group. Six months after surgery, the mean EPCO value (total IOL optic) was 0.07 +/- 0.17 in the C-flex group (n = 37) and 0.20 +/- 0.20 in the Centerflex group (n = 36) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test). By 12 months, the mean had increased to 0.16 +/- 0.20 in the C-flex group (n = 37) and 0.35 +/- 0.22 in the Centerflex group (n = 31) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test).

CONCLUSIONS

The C-flex IOLs showed good functional results and significantly lower PCO formation than the earlier model Centerflex IOL. The enhanced edge of the C-flex IOL seemed to improve PCO prevention clinically.

Cumulative neodymium:YAG laser rates after bag-in-the-lens and lens-in-the-bag intraocular lens implantation

PURPOSE

To study the cumulative neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser rate after bag-in-the-lens implantation (Morcher 89A) and lens-in-the-bag implantation (Morcher 92S) of 2 intraocular lenses (IOLs) of the same biomaterial.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.

METHODS

This study comprised 100 eyes of 87 patients who had the bag-in-the-lens IOL implantation between January 2000 and August 2004. The postoperative follow-up ranged between 17 and 72 months. One hundred eyes of 94 patients of the same age and with the same follow-up period received the lens-in-the-bag IOL. The cumulative Nd:YAG laser frequency rates in both groups were calculated, and the cumulative incidence rates were defined by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

No Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy was performed in eyes having bag-in-the-lens IOL implantation. A laser capsulotomy was performed in 20 eyes having lens-in-the-bag IOL implantation; the cumulative frequency in this group was 2% at 1 year and 20% at 71 months, with a plateau beginning at 42 months. The cumulative incidence rate of Nd:YAG posterior capsulotomy was approximately 2% at 1 year, increasing to approximately 28% at 42 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The cumulative Nd:YAG laser rate after bag-in-the-lens implantation was zero. A zero rate has not been reported with lens-in-the-bag implantation of an IOL of the same biomaterial or of other biomaterials, as published in the literature. Thus, it can be concluded that the bag-in-the-lens implantation technique has 100% effectiveness against posterior capsule opacification.

Quantitative Nachstarevaluierung von Acrylat- und Silikonintraokularlinsen mit scharfem Kantendesign

BACKGROUND

At the Department of Ophthalmology, Heidelberg, Germany, posterior capsule opacification (PCO) of a silicone and an acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) with a sharp optic edge design was evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective study either the AMO ClariFlex silicone IOL or the Sensar AR40e hydrophobic acrylic IOL were implanted in 47 patients following uneventful phacoemulsification. Mean patient age was 76.2+/-7.8 (ClariFlex) and 73.4+/-12.9 years (AR40e), respectively. The mean follow-up time was 19.7+/-5.34 in the ClariFlex and 21.9+/-1.89 months in the AR40e group. PCO development was evaluated postoperatively using the EPCO 2000 analysis software (scale 0-4). Areas of interest were the total IOL optic, the central 3-mm zone as well as the capsulorhexis.

RESULTS

In both groups, all patients achieved a BCVA of 20/32 (AR40e) and 20/25 (ClariFlex), respectively. There was a very low incidence of PCO development with a mean EPCO score of 0.07+/-0.2 (ClariFlex and 0.15+/-0.2 (AR40e). Within the 3-mm zone and the capsulorhexis, there was a tendency for even lower EPCO scores in both groups. We calculated a statistically significant difference for the two lens materials for all investigated IOL areas (Wilcoxon's test, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both IOLs with a sharp edge design showed good functional results, a stable position in the capsular bag as well as a low incidence of PCO development. However, the silicone IOL showed statistically significantly lower PCO scores.

Tilt and decentration of three-piece foldable high-refractive silicone and hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses with 6-mm optics in an intraindividual comparison

PURPOSE

Intraindividual comparison of tilt and decentration of three-piece foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) with 6-mm optics and different edge design and material.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized study.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with senile cataract (group I) received a foldable silicone, sharp optic edge IOL in one eye and a silicone, rounded optic edge IOL in the other eye. Group II (n = 28) received the foldable silicone, sharp optic edge IOL in one eye and an acrylate, sharp optic edge IOL in the other eye. Scheimpflug photography was performed after the procedure with an anterior eye segment analysis system. Tilt and decentration of the IOL optic were measured 1 week, 6 months, and 12 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

In group I, the foldable silicone, sharp optic edge IOL showed a mean optic tilt of 3.03 +/- 1.79 degrees and an optic decentration of 0.24 +/- 0.13 mm; the silicone, rounded optic edge IOL showed a tilt of 3.26 +/- 1.69 degrees and a decentration of 0.23 +/- 0.13 mm. In group II, the foldable silicone, sharp optic edge IOL showed an average tilt of 2.34 +/- 1.81 degrees and a decentration of 0.29 +/- 0.21 mm after 12 months; the acrylate, sharp optic edge IOL had a tilt of 2.32 +/- 1.41 degrees and a decentration of 0.24 +/- 0.10 mm. There were no significant differences in either group.

CONCLUSION

The examined IOLs showed a stable position regarding tilt and decentration in the first 12 postoperative months, independent of material and edge design. Slight deviations from the optical axis might affect the outcome in aspheric or multifocal IOLs.

Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates after use of the AcrySof acrylic three piece and one piece intraocular lenses

BACKGROUND/AIM

Acrylic lens size and shape may influence the rate of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and need for Nd:YAG capsulotomy. The aim of this study is to compare the Nd:YAG capsulotomy rate of the three piece acrylic/PMMA AcrySof MA series lens with the one piece acrylic AcrySof SA series lens.

METHODS

434 eyes of 329 patients who had cataract extraction and implantation of one of four types of intraocular lenses (IOLs) were evaluated for rate of Nd:YAG capsulotomy. 176 eyes received the acrylic AcrySof MA30AC IOL, 71 eyes the acrylic AcrySof MA60AC IOL, 45 eyes the acrylic AcrySof SA30AL IOL, and 142 eyes the acrylic AcrySof SA60AT IOL.

RESULTS

The rates of Nd:YAG capsulotomy with the three piece IOL (MA30AC/MA60AC) and the one piece IOL (SA30AL/SA60AT) were 1.2% and 2.1% at 6 months, 2.8% and 5.9% at 12 months, and 3.6% and 7.5% at 24 months, respectively. The incidence of Nd:YAG capsulotomy was higher in patients who received the one piece IOL (p=0.01, log rank test). There was no difference in Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates when comparing lens optic size, age, sex, history of pars plana vitrectomy, and diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows a greater incidence of Nd:YAG capsulotomy in patients who receive one piece acrylic AcrySof lenses when compared to those who receive three piece acrylic AcrySof lenses.

Sudden Reversible Vitritis After Keratoprosthesis

PURPOSE

To report our experience with late vitritis associated with keratoprosthesis (KPro).

METHODS

Between 1990 and 2003, 218 patients underwent an all-polymethylmethacrylate, collar button-shaped KPro surgery. Eight patients developed a total of 12 episodes of sudden, massive vitritis. Five of these patients had an Ahmed shunt implant, 3 had anterior vitrectomy during surgery, and 4 had a soft contact lens in place. Preoperative diagnoses were multiple graft failures, chemical burn, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, or ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. All patients were maintained on prophylactic topical ofloxacin 0.3% or polymyxin-B/trimethoprim, as well as prednisolone acetate 1% (in 2 cases, medroxyprogesterone 1%), at least twice daily. Vancomycin (14 mg/mL) was also given twice daily in 2 patients.

RESULTS

Vitritis occurred in 8 patients (12 episodes), 2 to 23 months postoperatively. All patients presented with sudden, very marked decrease in vision, with little or no pain, tenderness, conjunctival redness, or discharge. Eight of the 12 events were subjected to vitreous tap and injection of antibiotics and steroids on the day of presentation. Cultures grew Staphylococcus epidermidis, only in liquid (broth) media, in 3 cases; the other 5 showed no growth. The vitritis episodes resolved after 2 to 9 weeks. Full recovery to pre-episode status of a quiet eye with clear vitreous was seen in all patients. Visual acuity recovered almost completely or completely (mental debilitation in one patient made accurate assessment uncertain).

CONCLUSIONS

This phenomenon of sudden vitritis after KPro, with few other symptoms and with complete recovery, would be uncharacteristic of a bacterial endophthalmitis. It may represent a uveitic immune phenomenon.

[Influence of intraocular lens material and design on the development of posterior capsule opacification]

Based on the literature of 1999-2005, we attempted to clarify the influence of material and design of an intraocular lens (IOL) on the development of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and identify the future problems to be solved. The sharp edge design of an IOL has significantly reduced PCO in recent years. Histopathological studies showed that a sharp capsular bend was formed at the sharp posterior optic edge, and the migration of lens epithelial cells was obviously inhibited at the site. Experimental and clinical studies suggest that the sharper the edge is, the sharper the capsular bend, and the greater the preventive effect, regardless of IOL material. The sharp capsule bend appears to represent a physical hindrance, which may induce contact inhibition of cell movement. How material participates in the preventive effect should be clarified in a future study. Thus, at the moment, the formation of capsular bend at the posterior optic edge appears to be the decisive criterion to evaluate the influence of IOL material and design on the development of PCO. Optimization of design and material of an IOL, which facilitates capsular bend formation as sharply and quickly as possible, may reduce PCO to a clinically negligible level.