Assessment of HPV-mRNA test to predict recurrent disease in patients previously treated for CIN 2/3

Treatment characteristics, HPV genotype distribution and risk of subsequent disease among women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Europe: A systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

High-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), a premalignant lesion of the uterine cervix, is caused by persistent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection. CIN can be identified through screening programs and high-grade CIN is usually treated by ablation or excision. This study aimed to summarize the clinical management and outcomes among women with high-grade CIN in Europe.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify treatment methods and their frequency of use, report HPV genotype prevalence and distribution and summarize patterns for subsequent lesions after primary treatment, among women with high-grade CIN in Europe. Embase®, MEDLINE® and Cochrane databases were searched (1st January 2012 to 30th August 2022), along with relevant conference proceedings (2018-2022), inclusive. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) compliant methodology was adopted. Eligibility criteria included non-immunosuppressed female patients with CIN2+ from Europe (published in English).

RESULTS

In total, n = 55 studies were included. CIN excisional therapy was the most received treatment approach (15.8-100 %, loop electrosurgical excision procedure/large loop excision of the transformation zone most common), followed by ablative therapies (1-43.3 %, cold coagulation most common). Other approaches included 'wait and watch' (4.8-52.6 %) and hysterectomy (4.8-16.2 %). HPV positivity rates ranged from 67.8-100 % pre-conization and 4.7-32.8 % post-conization. The most prevalent HPV genotypes reported (both pre- and post-treatment) were HPV16 and HPV18. In patients who received excisional or ablative procedures subsequent CIN was most frequently diagnosed ≤6 months after treatment. The overall rate of subsequent CIN reported was 0.5-20.9 %.

CONCLUSION

Conization and ablation were the most common techniques, however, these procedures were associated with sub-optimal outcomes. Close clinical follow-up is important due to the risk of subsequent CIN or invasive cancer. This review serves as a reference point for the comparison of future treatment patterns as they evolve across Europe, following improved implementation of prophylactic HPV vaccination and screening.

Possible role of negative human papillomavirus E6/E7 mRNA as a predictor of regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 lesions in hr-HPV positive women

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the regression rate of CIN2 p16 positive lesions in women over 25 years of age and identify possible predictors of regression.

Methods

A total of 128 CIN2 p16 positive patients over 25 years old were considered. The women met the following inclusion criteria: HPV genotype 16, 18, 31, 33, 45 positive, HPV E6 / E7 mRNA test positive, without immune system pathologies, not pregnant and had completed at least two years of follow-up. At each follow-up examination patients were examined by colposcopy, HPV test, E6/E7mRNA, targeted biopsy and p16 protein detection. The final state after the two years of follow-up was classified as progression if the histology showed a CIN3, persistence if the lesion was a CIN2, regression if negative or LSIL. The predicted regression factors evaluated were: HPV E6/E7mRNA, protein p16.

Results

Overall, we had 35.1% (45 cases) of progression to CIN3, 41.4% (53 cases) of persistence and 23.4% (30 cases) of regression. The regression rate was higher in women with negative mRNA 92.8% (26/28), OR 312 (34.12–1798.76) p = 0.0001, while women with p16 negative had a regression of 22.6% (7/31), OR 0.94 (95% CI 0.36–2.46), p was not significant. We found no significant difference in regression between p16 positive (23.7%) and p16 negative (22.6%) CIN2 p16 lesions. p16 had a VPN of 22.6 (CI 95% 0.159–0.310), indicating that a p16 negative lesion does not exclude a CIN2 + .

Conclusions

We had a regression rate of 23.4%, which was low if we consider that in the literature the regression rates vary from 55 to 63%. The discrepancy in the results may indeed be explained by the fact that all lesions in our study were hr-HPV positive and belonged to “older women” reflecting a more "high-risk" population. As regression factors we studied p16 and HPV E6/E7 mRNA. The results of our study show that HPV mRNA, if negative, appears to be able to identify CIN2 lesions with a higher probability of regression and underlines how a p16 negative is not an indicator of regression.

Case Report: Giant Pelvic Cystic Appearance—An Unusual Feature of Uterine Cervical Adenocarcinoma

Cervical adenocarcinoma can present as a solid, mixed solid, cystic, or multiple cystic cervical mass in the endocervical canal. In this report, we present an extremely rare case of cervical adenocarcinoma with giant cystic lesions. A 37-year-old Chinese woman with a regular menstrual cycle presented to her local doctor complaining of mild abdominal distension. Abdominal ultrasonography suggested an ovarian cyst, whose mean diameter increased from 3 to 8 cm in 3 months. Thereafter, she was referred to our hospital. She had no abnormal vaginal bleeding or discharge. Transvaginal ultrasonography revealed a 95 × 80 mm cyst below the back of the uterus. Computed tomography revealed a 9.8 × 8.5 cm multilocular cyst between the cervix and right ovary. Human papillomavirus (HPV)-E6 and -E7 mRNA tests revealed HPV-16 positivity. The thin-layer, liquid-based cytological test of the cervix showed negative results. No tumor lesions were observed on the cervical biopsy histopathology. The lesion was misdiagnosed as an ovarian cyst prior to the surgery. Intraoperatively, a cyst of the size of a child's head was observed extending from the low posterior wall of the uterus to the posterior lip of the cervix, and the cervical cysts were resected. Histological examination revealed cervical adenocarcinoma. Subsequently, she underwent extensive hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, and pelvic lymphadenectomy. The final diagnosis was stage IB3 cervical adenocarcinoma. After 21 months of follow-up, no clinical or radiological evidence of recurrence has been found.

Diagnostic performance of HPV E6/E7 mRNA testing towards HPV-DNA testing and p16/Ki67 immunostaining as a biomarker of high-risk HPV recurrence in Greek women surgically treated for their cervical lesions

AIM

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of E6/E7 HPV-mRNA overexpression towards HPV-DNA testing and p16/Ki67 immunocytochemistry in a post-op population to verify if this biomarker can be effectively used as indicator of successful cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) treatment.

METHODS

Our study retrospectively analyzed 197 patients of our Colposcopy Clinic between January 2013 and September 2020 coming with an abnormal Pap smear suggestive for colposcopy, and after a series of follow-ups including liquid-based cytology (LBC) and punch-biopsy sampling, there were surgically treated. LBC was used for cytology and molecular analysis of the three HPV-related biomarkers.

RESULTS

Six months after treatment, 93% of the HPV-mRNA-positive women became negative while this applied to only 80.2% of the HPV-DNA-positive women. HPV persistence was 6.9% at 6-12 months after treatment. The comparison among cytology, colposcopy, HPV-DNA test, and HPV-mRNA test after treatment revealed that the last one is the only with a strong correlation with actual severity (histology during treatment) (ρ = 0.345, p = 0.006) implying that clinical cases with more severe CIN may have higher chances of unsuccessful treatment. HPV-mRNA test had higher sensitivity (100%), specificity (96.88%), and positive predictive value (45.45%) for CIN2+ recurrent lesions when compared with HPV-DNA testing (80%, 82.81%, 10.81% respectively) and p16/Ki67 immunocytochemistry (80%, 95.83%, 33.33% respectively) while their negative predictive values were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

E6/E7 mRNA detection has higher diagnostic values for the prediction of treatment failure compared with HPV-DNA testing and p16/Ki67 immunocytochemistry, and as an outcome could be used as predictive indicator of CIN-treatment status.

Analysis of factors affecting the prognosis of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2

According to the 2014 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of Female Reproductive Organs, patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN2) have an equivocal diagnosis, but p16 is considered as the reference index for CIN2. Positive p16 expression in CIN2 is associated with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), whereas p16 negative lesions are low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. The purpose of the present study was to examine the clinical value of p16 and human papillomavirus (HPV) E6/E7 mRNA in the prognostication of patients with CIN2. From January 2013 to January 2016, 108 patients were diagnosed with CIN2 by biopsy and followed up at 6-month intervals at Peking University People's Hospital (Beijing, China). The expression of HPV E6/E7 mRNA was detected by in situ hybridization, while the expression of p16 and Ki-67 proteins was detected by immunohistochemistry. Of the 108 CIN2 cases, 20 progressed to HSIL/CIN3, 36 cases demonstrated persistence with CIN2 after the follow-up and 52 cases achieved regression (≤CIN1). Of the p16-positive 82 cases, 20 cases were detected to have progressed, whereas in the p16-negative group, no progression was observed. There were statistically significant differences among the p16-positive and negative groups (P<0.05). In the HPV E6/E7 mRNA-positive 69 cases, 18 cases were detected to have progressed, whereas in the HPV E6/E7 mRNA-negative 39 cases, progression was detected in only 2 cases. There were statistically significant differences among the HPV E6/E7 mRNA-positive and negative groups (P<0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was plotted; the area under the curve for HPV E6/E7 mRNA was 0.745, that for p16 was 0.546 and that for Ki-67 was 0.501. The detection of HPV E6/E7 mRNA may provide important predictive information for the prognosis of CIN2, however p16 and Ki-67 proteins may provide little value.

Accuracy of mRNA HPV tests as a predictor of recurrence of precursor lesions and cervical cancer after conization: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: This systematic review evaluates the accuracy of mRNA HPV biomarker for the identification of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) or cervical cancer during a follow-up after conization, taking histopathology as reference standard. Methods: A search of electronic databases was performed, for studies published until June 2018. As results, after screening, five studies including 1148 patients met the inclusion criteria. Dichotomization was performed by CIN2+ versus CIN1-. By analyzing all five studies, a sensitivity of 62.4% (95% CI: 54.8-69.7), specificity of 91.9% (95% CI: 90.0-93.5) and area under the curve of 0.5685 were revealed. Conclusion: mRNA HPV assay presents a high specificity and is an adequate tool for cervical cancer screening in the follow-up after conization.

Tumor markers of uterine cervical cancer: a new scenario to guide surgical practice?

Since the introduction of Pap smear screening, the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer (CC) have been reduced drastically in USA and in other western states. Nevertheless, CC still remains the main cause of death from gynecological cancer in developing countries where screening programs are scant or inexistent. This evidence highlights the efficacy of screening, and the wide use of Human Papilloma Viruses (HPV) vaccines in developed countries. More and more people are, consequentially, undergoing a screening procedure, usually combined with HPV DNA test, increasing the early diagnosis of intraepithelial HPV-related lesions. The long transit time from early cervical lesion to invasive cancer provides an opportunity to identify pre-cancerous lesions where treatment result is maximum. In fact, when an invasive CC occurs, the overall survival rate strictly depends on stage of disease with an average survival of 70% at 5 years. Under the pressure of this reality, researches have made efforts to individuate cancer markers as indicator of specific cancer events. Some markers were showed to be able to detect those intraepithelial lesions have more chance to evolve to invasive forms (p16^ink4a, p16, E-cadherin, Ki67, pRb, p53). Markers such as CEA, SCC-Ag, CD44, have been developed to detect invasive forms. Although cancer markers actually are not used only for early diagnosis, they may be useful in others fields of application such as evaluation and monitoring of treatments to improve diagnosis and treatment of CC.

RNA extraction method is crucial for human papillomavirus E6/E7 oncogenes detection

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing plays a main role in the management of cervical cancer, however to improve the specificity in cervical screening, there is a need to develop and validate different approaches that can identify women at risk for progressive disease. Nowadays, mRNA expression of viral E6 and E7 HPV oncogenes stands up as a potential biomarker to improve cervical screening. We aimed to validate a method for RNA extraction, detect HPV mRNA expression and, assess the relationship between E6/E7 mRNA expression and pathology of patients' lesions and progression.

METHODS

This study included 50 specimens that had been previously genotyped as HPV16, 18, 31, 33 and/or 45. Cervical swabs were extracted with three different RNA extraction methods -Nuclisens manual extraction kit (bioMérieux), High Pure Viral RNA Kit (Roche) and RNeasy Plus Mini kit (Qiagen)-, and mRNA was detected with NucliSens EasyQ HPV version 1 test (bioMérieux) afterwards. Association of oncogene expression with pathology and lesion progression was analyzed for each extraction method.

RESULTS

E6/E7 mRNA positivity rate was higher in samples analyzed with bioMérieux (62%), followed by Roche (24%) and Qiagen (6%). Women with lesions and lesion progression showed a higher prevalence of viral RNA expression than women that had not lesions or with lesion persistence. While bioMérieux revealed a higher sensitivity (77.27%), Roche presented a higher PPV (75%) and an increased specificity (89.28%).

CONCLUSIONS

Extraction methods based on magnetic beads provided better RNA yield than those based in columns. Both Nuclisens manual extraction kit (bioMérieux) and High Pure Viral RNA Kit (Roche) seemed to be adequate for E6/E7 mRNA detection. However, none of them revealed both high sensitivity and specificity values. Further studies are needed to obtain and validate a standard gold method for RNA expression detection, to be included as part of the routine cervical screening program.

HPV testing in the context of post-treatment follow up (test of cure)

BACKGROUND

Women treated for cervical lesions are at higher risk of subsequent disease compared to the general population. Consequently, post treatment surveillance strategies are required to ensure the success of treatment, so called "test of cure". The high sensitivity and negative predictive value of HPV assays can enhance post-treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVES

To provide an overview of the current data on test of cure strategies with a particular focus on HPV testing and to identify knowledge gaps and areas for further research.

RESULTS

HPV testing is sensitive for the detection of residual or recurrent disease post treatment for CIN2+ and is more sensitive than cytology alone. Co-testing increases sensitivity, marginally and there is a lack of consensus regarding the efficiency and safety to release negative women. Most test of cure studies have applied HPV DNA tests and post treatment positivity rates vary widely depending on assay and potentially, treatment type.

CONCLUSIONS

Globally, an increasing number of test of cure algorithms now incorporate HPV testing although there is heterogeneity of practice with respect to assay, number of post treatment tests, testing intervals, follow up time. While type specific persistence identified through genotyping may identify those at greater risk of disease there is no consensus as to how this may be applied, clinically. Data on HPV testing in women treated for glandular lesions would be welcome as would the performance of different HPV assays and associated biomarkers in this context.

Performance of HPV DNA testing in the follow-up after treatment of high-grade cervical lesions, adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and microinvasive carcinoma

Background

Over the last two decades it has become clear that distinct types of human papillomavirus (HPV), the so-called high-risk types (hrHPV), are the major cause of cervical cancer. The hrHPV-DNA testing has shown excellent performance in several clinical applications from screening to the follow-up of conservatively treated patients.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of the recent literature on the performance of HPV DNA testing in follow-up after treatment of high-grade cervical lesions, adenocarcinoma in situ, and microinvasive carcinoma compared to Pap smear cytology.

Results

Observational studies have demonstrated that the high risk hrHPV-DNA test is significantly more sensitive (95%) compared to follow-up cytology(70%) in detecting post-treatment squamous intraepithelial high-grade lesions. Moreover, in patients treated conservatively for cervical adenocarcinoma in situ, the hrHPV-DNA test is the most significant independent predictor of recurrent disease or progression to invasive cancer, and the combination of viral DNA testing and cytology reaches 90% sensitivity in detecting persistent lesions at the first follow-up visit and 100% at the second follow-up visit. The cause of microinvasive squamous cervical carcinoma is increasingly treated with conservative therapies in order to preserve fertility, and an effective strategy allowing early detection of residual or progressive disease has become more and more important in post-treatment follow-up. Primary results seem to indicate that the median time for viral clearance is relatively longer compared with patients treated for CIN and suggest a prolonged surveillance for these patients. However, the potential clinical value of HPV-DNA testing in this clinical setting needs to be confirmed by further observations.

Conclusions

The excellent sensitivity, negative predictive value, and optimal reproducibility of the hrHPV DNA testing, currently is considered a powerful tool in the clinicians’ hands to better manage post-treatment follow-up either in cervical squamous lesion or in situ adenocarcinoma.

E6/E7 mRNA testing for human papilloma virus-induced high-grade cervical intraepithelial disease (CIN2/CIN3): a promising perspective

Since the introduction of biomolecular testing for the identification of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA (hrHPV-DNA) in cervical cancer preventive strategies, many interesting aspects have emerged in this field; firstly, HPV-DNA testing has been demonstrated to have better sensitivity than conventional cytology in several settings: screening, triage of ASC-US and in follow-up after treatment. Despite this, some limitations of these new technologies have also been underlined: the major issue is the low specificity of the tests, which cannot discriminate between regressive and progressive infections. Thus, recent research has moved the attention towards novel markers of progression that could more precisely detect cases at real risk of cancer development. In view of the fact that progression to cancer is dependable of the E6/E7 proteins integration and transforming action, the overexpression of E6/E7 transcripts has been seen as a valuable marker of this risk. This review aims to summarise the literature data on this topic and to provide a clear view of the emerging perspectives.