The Bucket Test Improves Detection of Stroke in Patients With Acute Dizziness

Vestibular syndromes, diagnosis and diagnostic errors in patients with dizziness presenting to the emergency department: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine the frequency of vestibular syndromes, diagnoses, diagnostic errors and resources used in patients with dizziness in the emergency department (ED).

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients presenting with dizziness.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

We collected clinical data from the initial ED report from July 2015 to August 2020 and compared them with the follow-up report if available. We calculated the prevalence of vestibular syndromes and stroke prevalence in patients with dizziness. Vestibular syndromes are differentiated in acute (AVS) (eg, stroke, vestibular neuritis), episodic (EVS) (eg, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, transient ischaemic attack) and chronic (CVS) (eg, persistent postural-perceptual dizziness) vestibular syndrome. We reported the rate of diagnostic errors using the follow-up diagnosis as the reference standard.

RESULTS

We included 1535 patients with dizziness. 19.7% (303) of the patients presented with AVS, 34.7% (533) with EVS, 4.6% (71) with CVS and 40.9% (628) with no or unclassifiable vestibular syndrome. The three most frequent diagnoses were stroke/minor stroke (10.1%, 155), benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (9.8%, 150) and vestibular neuritis (9.6%, 148). Among patients with AVS, 25.4% (77) had stroke. The cause of the dizziness remained unknown in 45.0% (692) and 18.0% received a false diagnosis. There was a follow-up in 662 cases (43.1%) and 58.2% with an initially unknown diagnoses received a final diagnosis. Overall, 69.9% of all 1535 patients with dizziness received neuroimaging (MRI 58.2%, CT 11.6%) in the ED.

CONCLUSIONS

One-fourth of patients with dizziness in the ED presented with AVS with a high prevalence (10%) of vestibular strokes. EVS was more frequent; however, the rate of undiagnosed patients with dizziness and the number of patients receiving neuroimaging were high. Almost half of them still remained without diagnosis and among those diagnosed were often misclassified. Many unclear cases of vertigo could be diagnostically clarified after a follow-up visit.

Ocular lateral deviation as a vestibular sign to improve detection of posterior circulation strokes: A review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Posterior circulation stroke can present with dizziness/vertigo without other general neurological symptoms or signs, making it difficult to detect, and missed stroke can deteriorate. Therefore, a sign that can be easily identified during an examination would be helpful to improve the detection of this type of stroke.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to highlight an ocular sign that is seen in posterior circulation strokes called ocular lateral deviation (OLD). OLD is mostly seen in dorsolateral medullary strokes, and it is also seen in pontine and cerebellar strokes. OLD is detected by asking a patient to look straight ahead and then briefly close their eyes. Upon re-opening their eyes, the examiner will see that the eyes have deviated to one side; the patient's eyes will then make corrective saccade(s) to return to looking straight ahead. Complete eye deviation is a central sign of posterior circulation stroke.

DISCUSSION

OLD is an under-recognized vestibular ocular sign of central vestibulopathies including posterior circulation stroke. The most common location is in the dorsolateral medulla, where one-third of such strokes have complete OLD. Eye deviation can also be appreciated on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. OLD can be detected up to 6 months after a posterior circulation stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

Checking for the sign of complete eye deviation in patients with dizziness/vertigo could be a simple, quick method for detecting posterior circulation stroke, and a means to improving the patients' outcome.

Fatal posterior circulation stroke with persistent hiccups, sinus arrest and post-hiccup syncope: A case report

RATIONALE

Diagnosis of posterior circulation stoke is difficult, and magnetic resonance imaging especially diffusion-weighted imaging is superior to computed tomography. Persistent hiccups, sinus arrest, and post-hiccup syncope are extremely rare symptoms of posterior circulation stroke. However, there is no effective treatment for persistent hiccup.

PATIENT CONCERN AND DIAGNOSIS

We describe a case of a 58-year-old hypertensive woman diagnosed with acute posterior circulation stroke who presented with persistent hiccups, sinus arrest, and post-hiccup syncope. Diffusion-weighted imaging revealed a high-intensity signal involving the left middle cerebellar peduncle and several spotted areas in the right occipital lobe.

INTERVENTIONS

Permanent pacemaker was implanted and metoclopramide was used to treat persistent hiccups.

OUTCOME

The patient developed aspiration pneumonia and morbid dysphoria, and eventually died.

LESSONS

Posterior circulation stroke can cause cardiovascular and respiratory dysfunction. Consequently, physicians should pay more attention to posterior circulation lesions in patients with arrhythmia and syncope. An effective method to treat persistent hiccups is urgently needed.

Binocular Alignment Changes Between Sitting and Supine Positions in Patients with Dizziness

Vertical and torsional ocular misalignment can occur from mild traumatic brain injury or inner ear pathology, which may vary depending on head position. Here, we evaluate differences in a behavioral measure of binocular alignment in both upright and supine head position. Ocular perception of vertical and torsional alignment was measured using the torsional and vertical alignment nulling (TAN, VAN) task in N = 52 veterans with dizziness (N = 38 with traumatic brain injury), N = 41 civilians with vestibular schwannoma resection (UVD), and N = 33 healthy controls for both positions. The interquartile range within each group, regardless of head position, was greater for torsional compared to vertical misalignment. We use generalized estimating equations to compare average TAN (torsional) scores and VAN (vertical) scores between groups and test position. Compared to the healthy controls, TAN was significantly increased by + 0.4186° in veterans (P = 0.030) and by + 0.5747° in UVD (P = 0.010), but there was no difference with head position. For VAN, no difference was found between the three groups, but the misalignment did worsen by 0.0888° (P = 0.0070) as the head position moved from upright to supine. Head position had negligible effects on this behavioral measure of vertical and torsional binocular misalignment, and torsional misalignments were worse than controls in both veterans with dizziness and patients with vestibular nerve resection although neither reported torsional diplopia. Our data suggests that the tolerance for roll misalignment may be abnormally large in patients with dizziness. Alternatively, perceptual roll misalignments may be a manifest cause for dizziness, and therefore a useful proxy for distinguishing differences in putative otolith function in veterans with dizziness.