1
|
Merry E, Kesmez RT, Yu T, Flynn M, Ledermann J, Lockley M, Macdonald N, McCormack M, Nicum S, Crusz S, Miller R. A multicenter retrospective study to assess feasibility, safety and efficacy of first-line carboplatin-paclitaxel versus carboplatin monotherapy in a frail, elderly epithelial ovarian cancer population. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024:ijgc-2024-005394. [PMID: 39231541 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/06/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Underrepresentation of elderly ovarian cancer patients in clinical trials has led to lack of clarity regarding optimal first-line chemotherapy in this cohort. The Elderly Women with Ovarian Cancer (EWOC)-1 trial demonstrated that 3-weekly carboplatin (3wC) resulted in worse survival and feasibility compared with standard 3-weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel (3wCP) in frail, elderly ovarian cancer patients. Our retrospective study compares feasibility, safety, and efficacy of first-line 3wCP and 3wC in a frail ovarian cancer cohort. METHODS Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed for newly-diagnosed, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III/IV, ≥70-year-old epithelial ovarian cancer patients, treated by clinician choice with 3wC or 3wCP at two London cancer centers over a 2 year period. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status provided surrogate markers of frailty. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 graded toxicity. RESULTS A total of 107 patients were treated with 3wC (n=30) and 3wCP (n=77). Age, performance status, and CCI were significantly different between cohorts, with 3wC patients older (84 vs 75 years, p<0.001), with more comorbidities (median CCI 4 vs 3, p<0.001) and worse performance status (47% vs 17% PS ≥2, p=0.015). Surgical outcomes differed significantly between cohorts, with 20 (67%) 3wC patients not undergoing surgery, compared with 22 (29%) 3wCP patients (p<0.001). Median follow-up was 45.8 months (IQR 38.7-56.3 months). While we observed improved progression-free (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.90, p=0.017) and overall survival (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.73, p=0.001, log-rank test) in a univariate cox proportional hazards comparison between 3wCP and 3wC, this was not significant on multivariate analysis. Completion of six planned chemotherapy cycles was achieved by the majority, with similar discontinuation rates between groups (13% 3wC vs 8% 3wCP, p>0.05). Overall grade ≥3 hematological toxicity rates were similar between regimens (33% 3wC vs 44% 3wCP, p=0.37) with grade ≥3 neutropenia (p=0.019) and grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia (p=0.006) more common with 3wCP and 3wC, respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION Our data demonstrates that standard 3wCP is a well-tolerated, feasible first-line treatment for frail, elderly ovarian cancer patients. Improved survival with 3wCP was not significant when corrected for established clinical prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Merry
- Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Tamara Yu
- Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Michael Flynn
- Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Ledermann
- Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Michelle Lockley
- Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Bart's Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Nicola Macdonald
- Gynaecological Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mary McCormack
- Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Shibani Nicum
- Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Rowan Miller
- Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lund CM, Nielsen DL, Schultz M, Dolin TG. Physical decline, falls, and hospitalization among vulnerable older patients in the trajectory of colorectal cancer treatment. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101820. [PMID: 38955634 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Resilience to anticancer treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) among older patients varies. Many experience weight loss, physical decline, falls, and hospitalization during treatment, often leading to early discontinuation of otherwise effective chemotherapy. Screening for vulnerability might help to identify patients at risk of these adverse outcomes in older adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a secondary analysis from the GERICO trial. Patients aged ≥70 years assessed for chemotherapy for CRC were screened for eligibility for the GERICO trial with the geriatric-8 (G8) frailty screening tool. The present study population comprised patients who were (1) screened with G8 but for reasons not included in the GERICO study and (2) patients who were randomized to the GERICO control group. We evaluated whether patients identified as vulnerable with G8 (≤14/17) or retrospectively constructed mG8 (≥6/35) had higher risk of experiencing decline in performance status (PS), falls, and unplanned hospitalization during treatment. The association between frailty status and the adverse outcomes was analyzed with univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The discriminative ability of G8/mG8 to predict outcomes was analyzed using the area under the curve for receiver operating characteristics curves. RESULTS In total, 238 patients (median age 74 years [range 70-91]) were included in this analysis. More vulnerable than fit patients experienced decline in PS (G8: 41% vs. 14%, p = 0.006 and mG8: 28% vs. 17%, p = 0.04) during treatment. Furthermore, more vulnerable than fit patients experienced falls (G8 14% vs. 6% p = 0.04) and unplanned hospitalization (G8: 31% vs. 14%, p = 0.009 and mG8: 34% vs. 13%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed an association between G8 vulnerability and decline in PS, falls, and hospitalization. DISCUSSION Patients with G8 or mG8 vulnerability were more likely to experience decline in PS and unplanned hospitalization during chemotherapy for CRC than fit patients. More G8 vulnerable patients experienced falls compared with fit patients. Appropriate interventions should be offered to older patients with CRC assessed as vulnerable with G8 or mG8 to maintain PS during chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia M Lund
- Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark; CopenAge, Copenhagen Center for Clinical Age Research, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Denmark.
| | - Dorte L Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Denmark
| | - Martin Schultz
- Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark; CopenAge, Copenhagen Center for Clinical Age Research, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Denmark
| | - Troels G Dolin
- Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark; CopenAge, Copenhagen Center for Clinical Age Research, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Giger AKW, Ditzel HM, Ewertz M, Ditzel H, Jørgensen TL, Pfeiffer P, Lund C, Ryg J. Effect of comprehensive geriatric assessment on hospitalizations in older adults with frailty initiating curatively intended oncologic treatment: The PROGNOSIS-RCT study. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101821. [PMID: 39034167 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2024] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Frailty constitutes a risk for unplanned hospitalizations in older adults with cancer. This study examines whether comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) as an add-on to standard oncologic care can prevent unplanned hospitalizations in older adults with frailty and cancer who initiate curative oncological treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS This randomized controlled trial included older adults aged ≥70 with frailty (Geriatric 8 [G8] ≤14), and solid cancers who initiated curative oncological treatment. Participants were randomized 1:1 to either standard oncologic care (control) or standard oncologic care supplemented with CGA-guided interventions (intervention). Baseline characteristics were retrieved prior to randomization. The primary endpoint, the between-group rate ratio of unplanned hospitalizations within six months of treatment initiation, was analyzed using negative binominal regression. Analyses were performed using an intention-to-treat approach, followed by per-protocol analysis, including participants receiving CGA within 30 days of randomization, and preplanned subgroup analyses based on treatment modality and Geriatric 8 screening. Secondary endpoints included acute hospital contacts, treatment adherence, and toxicity. RESULTS From November 1, 2020 to May 31, 2023, 173 participants were enrolled. Median age was 75 (interquartile range 72-79), 51.5% were female, 58% had a G8 score > 12, and 84% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. The most common cancer sites were lung (23%), upper gastrointestinal (15%), and breast (13%). The rate (per person-years) of unplanned hospitalization was 1.32 in the intervention group and 1.81 in the control group, with a between-group rate ratio of 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-1.23, P = 0.25) favoring the intervention. The between-group rate ratio increased in the per-protocol analysis (0.64 [95% CI 0.37-1.10, P = 0.10]). Similarly, no significant between group differences were found in treatment adherence, rate of acute hospital contacts, or toxicity. DISCUSSION In this study, CGA did not significantly reduce the rate of unplanned hospitalizations. Furthermore, no between-group differences were found in treatment adherence, toxicity lead hospitalizations, or treatment completion in older adults with cancer and frailty. However, per-protocol analysis suggests that increasing adherence to CGA may improve the outcome. Larger studies ensuring higher CGA adherence are warranted to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Kristine Weber Giger
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Fionavej 36, 5230 Odense, Denmark; OPEN, Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws vej 9A, 5000 Odense, Denmark, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
| | - Helena Møgelbjerg Ditzel
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Fionavej 36, 5230 Odense, Denmark; OPEN, Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws vej 9A, 5000 Odense, Denmark, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Marianne Ewertz
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Fionavej 36, 5230 Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Henrik Ditzel
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Fionavej 36, 5230 Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Trine Lembrecht Jørgensen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Fionavej 36, 5230 Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Per Pfeiffer
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Fionavej 36, 5230 Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Cecilia Lund
- Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls vej 1, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3b, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark; CopenAge, Copenhagen Center for Clinical Age research, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3b, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jesper Ryg
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Fionavej 36, 5230 Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dorner TE, Smeikal M, Unseld M, Gisinger C. Predicting future medical needs and mortality risk in geriatric long-term care patients : Development and validation of the Nascher score and revised Nascher score. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2024; 136:515-522. [PMID: 39102051 PMCID: PMC11390801 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-024-02410-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Choosing the right intensity of medical care is a huge challenge particularly in long-term geriatric care. The Nascher score was developed to assess future medical care needs. The aim of this study was to determine whether the Nascher score and a revised version can predict future medical needs. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, 396 residents in long-term care hospitals, who were admitted over a period of two years and followed up to two and a half yeare, were analysed. Outcome parameters were: (1) number of medication changes, (2) number of ward doctor documentations and (3) number of acute illnesses treated with antibiotics, and mortality risk. Based on the first results, an alternative scoring of the Nascher score with 12 instead of 26 items was developed, called the revised Nascher score. RESULTS The Nascher score significantly correlated with the number of medication changes, the number of ward doctor documentations, and the number of acute ilnesses treated with antibiotics with Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.30, 0.26, and 0.15, respectively. The revised Nascher score showed a higher correlation with correlation coefficients of 0.36, 0.26, and 0.21, respectively. Residents with a Nascher score in the highest quartile had a significantly higher mortality risk than residents in the lowest quartile (hazard ratio, HR 2.97, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.80-4.34). The corresponding values for the revised Nascher score were HR 3.03, 95% CI 2.03-4.54 in the highest and HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.24-2.60 in the middle quartiles. CONCLUSION The Nascher score and even more so the revised Nascher score are well suited to predicting the various parameters of future medical needs and mortality risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas E Dorner
- Academy for Ageing Research, Haus der Barmherzigkeit, Seeböckgasse 30a, 1160, Vienna, Austria.
- Center for Public Health, Department for Social and Preventive Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- Karl Landsteiner Institute for Health Promotion Research, Haus der Barmherzigkeit Clementinum, Kirchstetten, Austria.
| | - Michael Smeikal
- Academy for Ageing Research, Haus der Barmherzigkeit, Seeböckgasse 30a, 1160, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Unseld
- Academy for Ageing Research, Haus der Barmherzigkeit, Seeböckgasse 30a, 1160, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christoph Gisinger
- Academy for Ageing Research, Haus der Barmherzigkeit, Seeböckgasse 30a, 1160, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Magnuson A, Loh KP, Stauffer F, Dale W, Gilmore N, Kadambi S, Klepin HD, Kyi K, Lowenstein LM, Phillips T, Ramsdale E, Schiaffino MK, Simmons JF, Williams GR, Zittel J, Mohile S. Geriatric assessment for the practicing clinician: The why, what, and how. CA Cancer J Clin 2024. [PMID: 39207229 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Revised: 07/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Older adults with cancer heterogeneously experience health care, treatment, and symptoms. Geriatric assessment (GA) offers a comprehensive evaluation of an older individual's health status and can predict cancer-related outcomes in individuals with solid tumors and those with hematologic malignancies. In the last decade, randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the benefits of GA and GA management (GAM), which uses GA information to provide tailored intervention strategies to address GA impairments (e.g., implementing physical therapy for impaired physical function). Multiple phase 3 clinical trials in older adults with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies have demonstrated that GAM improves treatment completion, quality of life, communication, and advance care planning while reducing treatment-related toxicity, falls, and polypharmacy. Nonetheless, implementation and uptake of GAM remain challenging. Various strategies have been proposed, including the use of GA screening tools, to identify patients most likely to benefit from GAM, the systematic engagement of the oncology workforce in the delivery of GAM, and the integration of technologies like telemedicine and mobile health to enhance the availability of GA and GAM interventions. Health inequities in minoritized groups persist, and systematic GA implementation has the potential to capture social determinants of health that are relevant to equitable care. Caregivers play an important role in cancer care and experience burden themselves. GA can guide dyadic supportive care interventions, ultimately helping both patients and caregivers achieve optimal health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Magnuson
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Fiona Stauffer
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - William Dale
- Department of Supportive Care, City of Hope, Antelope Valley, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Nikesha Gilmore
- Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Sindhuja Kadambi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Heidi D Klepin
- Section on Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kaitlin Kyi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Lisa M Lowenstein
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tanyanika Phillips
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics, City of Hope, Antelope Valley, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Erika Ramsdale
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Melody K Schiaffino
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - John F Simmons
- Cancer and Aging Research Group SCOREboard, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Grant R Williams
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Jason Zittel
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Supriya Mohile
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hosoi T, Yamana H, Matsumoto S, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Akishita M, Yasunaga H, Ogawa S. Implementation status of comprehensive geriatric assessment among older inpatients: A nationwide retrospective study. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024. [PMID: 39105664 DOI: 10.1111/ggi.14953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2024] [Revised: 07/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
AIM The importance of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is increasing in aging societies worldwide. However, there are few comprehensive studies on CGA, resulting in a limited understanding of its implementation rate, temporal changes and factors associated with its implementation. We aimed to investigate the implementation status of CGA and its regional variance in Japan. METHODS Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we investigated CGA trends, and identified the patient, hospital and regional factors associated with its implementation. We identified patients aged ≥65 years who were admitted for the first time between 2016 and 2020 with a diagnosis of stroke, heart failure, pneumonia, bone fracture or colorectal cancer. We examined the CGA implementation rate according to patient and hospital characteristics. We also investigated temporal changes and tendencies to carry out CGA in different prefectures. RESULTS A total of 1 974 817 patients were analyzed, of whom 570 696 (28.9%) underwent CGA. The implementation trend increased steadily from 25.3% in fiscal year 2016 to 33.4% in fiscal year 2019. The implementation rate also increased with patient age (30.3% in patients aged ≥95 years). Regional variations in its implementation status were observed, with a higher tendency to be implemented in areas near major metropolitan regions. A trend toward carrying out CGA for colorectal cancer, but not for other diseases, has been observed in eastern Japan. CONCLUSION Although CGA is increasingly carried out, considerable regional differences remain in its implementation status. Initiatives to reduce variations are necessary. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; ••: ••-••.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuya Hosoi
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hayato Yamana
- Data Science Center, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoya Matsumoto
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Matsui
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fushimi
- Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Akishita
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideo Yasunaga
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sumito Ogawa
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Seghers PALN, Rostoft S, O'Hanlon S, O'Donovan A, Schulkes K, Montroni I, Portielje JEA, Wildiers H, Soubeyran P, Hamaker ME. How to incorporate chronic health conditions in oncologic decision-making and care for older patients with cancer? A survey among healthcare professionals. Eur Geriatr Med 2024; 15:1055-1067. [PMID: 38507039 PMCID: PMC11377634 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-023-00919-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE A substantial proportion of patients with cancer are older and experience multimorbidity. As the population is ageing, the management of older patients with multimorbidity including cancer will represent a significant challenge to current clinical practice. METHODS This study aimed to (1) identify which chronic health conditions may cause change in oncologic decision-making and care in older patients and (2) provide guidance on how to incorporate these in decision-making and care provision of older patients with cancer. Based on a scoping literature review, an initial list of prevalent morbidities was developed. A subsequent survey among healthcare providers involved in the care for older patients with cancer assessed which chronic health conditions were relevant and why. RESULTS A list of 53 chronic health conditions was developed, of which 34 were considered likely or very likely to influence decision-making or care according to the 39 healthcare professionals who responded. These conditions were further categorized into five patient profiles. From these conditions, five patient profiles were developed, namely, (1) a somatic profile consisting of cardiovascular, metabolic, and pulmonary disease, (2) a functional profile, including conditions that cause disability, dependency or a high caregiver burden, (3) a psychosocial profile, including cognitive impairment, (4) a nutritional profile also including digestive system diseases, and finally, (5) a concurrent cancer profile. All profiles were considered likely to impact decision-making with differences between treatment modalities. The impact on the care trajectory was generally considered less significant, except for patients with care dependency and psychosocial health problems. CONCLUSIONS Chronic health conditions have various ways of influencing oncologic decision-making and the care trajectory in older adults with cancer. Understanding why specific chronic health conditions may impact the oncologic care trajectory can aid clinicians in the management of older patients with multimorbidity, including cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A L Nelleke Seghers
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Bosboomstraat 1, 3572 KE, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Siri Rostoft
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0424, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318, Oslo, Norway
| | - Shane O'Hanlon
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, D04 T6F4, Ireland
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland
| | - Anita O'Donovan
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity (ARTT), Discipline of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Karlijn Schulkes
- Department of Pulmonology, Diakonessenhuis, 3582 KE, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Isacco Montroni
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci, Viale Randi 5, 48121, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Johanneke E A Portielje
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center-LUMC, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Wildiers
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Pierre Soubeyran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Inserm U1312, SIRIC BRIO, Université de Bordeaux, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - Marije E Hamaker
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Bosboomstraat 1, 3572 KE, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Holstein Y, Mooijaart SP, van Oevelen M, van Deudekom FJ, Vojinovic D, Bizzarri D, van den Akker EB, Noordam R, Deelen J, van Heemst D, de Glas NA, Holterhues C, Labots G, van den Bos F, Beekman M, Slagboom PE, van Munster BC, Portielje JEA, Trompet S. The performance of metabolomics-based prediction scores for mortality in older patients with solid tumors. GeroScience 2024:10.1007/s11357-024-01261-6. [PMID: 38963649 DOI: 10.1007/s11357-024-01261-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Prognostic information is needed to balance benefits and risks of cancer treatment in older patients. Metabolomics-based scores were previously developed to predict 5- and 10-year mortality (MetaboHealth) and biological age (MetaboAge). This study aims to investigate the association of MetaboHealth and MetaboAge with 1-year mortality in older patients with solid tumors, and to study their predictive value for mortality in addition to established clinical predictors. This prospective cohort study included patients aged ≥ 70 years with a solid malignant tumor, who underwent blood sampling and a geriatric assessment before treatment initiation. The outcome was all-cause 1-year mortality. Of the 192 patients, the median age was 77 years. With each SD increase of MetaboHealth, patients had a 2.32 times increased risk of mortality (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.59-3.39). With each year increase in MetaboAge, there was a 4% increased risk of mortality (HR 1.04, 1.01-1.07). MetaboHealth and MetaboAge showed an AUC of 0.66 (0.56-0.75) and 0.60 (0.51-0.68) for mortality prediction accuracy, respectively. The AUC of a predictive model containing age, primary tumor site, distant metastasis, comorbidity, and malnutrition was 0.76 (0.68-0.83). Addition of MetaboHealth increased AUC to 0.80 (0.74-0.87) (p = 0.09) and AUC did not change with MetaboAge (0.76 (0.69-0.83) (p = 0.89)). Higher MetaboHealth and MetaboAge scores were associated with 1-year mortality. The addition of MetaboHealth to established clinical predictors only marginally improved mortality prediction in this cohort with various types of tumors. MetaboHealth may potentially improve identification of older patients vulnerable for adverse events, but numbers were too small for definitive conclusions. The TENT study is retrospectively registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR), trial number NL8107. Date of registration: 22-10-2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yara van Holstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Simon P Mooijaart
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
- LUMC Center for Medicine for Older People, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mathijs van Oevelen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Floor J van Deudekom
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, OLVG Hospitals Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dina Vojinovic
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section of Molecular Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniele Bizzarri
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section of Molecular Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Delft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Erik B van den Akker
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section of Molecular Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Delft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Raymond Noordam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Joris Deelen
- Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing, Cologne, Germany
- Cologne Excellence Cluster On Cellular Stress Responses in Ageing-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Diana van Heemst
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke A de Glas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cynthia Holterhues
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Labots
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Frederiek van den Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marian Beekman
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section of Molecular Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - P Eline Slagboom
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section of Molecular Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara C van Munster
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Stella Trompet
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Faour E, Guo S, Puts M. Geriatric Assessment in the Era of Targeted and Immunotherapy. Drugs Aging 2024; 41:577-582. [PMID: 38914823 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01126-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
Cancer is a disease that mostly affects older adults and because of the aging of the population, the number of older adults diagnosed with cancer will increase significantly around the world. With increasing age, more older adults are living with frailty, and this may impact the tolerability of cancer treatments. International guidelines, such as the American Society for Clinical Oncology geriatric oncology guideline, recommend a geriatric assessment and management for all older adults with cancer to support the treatment decision-making process as well as develop a plan for supportive care interventions to support the older adults during cancer treatments. While there is clinical trial evidence to support a geriatric assessment and management for older adults receiving chemotherapy, there is less evidence to support a geriatric assessment for older adults starting immunotherapy. There are increasing numbers of new immunotherapies and targeted therapies available for older adults with cancer but often few older adults have been included in the clinical trials, leaving less evidence for clinicians to guide treatment decisions. In this current opinion, we review the current evidence on the use of a geriatric assessment and management in the context of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. We review how a geriatric assessment could support older adults making treatment decisions for immunotherapy, review how geriatric assessment parameters are linked with outcomes and provide guidance on how geriatric assessment can guide the supportive care plan during immunotherapy treatment.
Collapse
|
10
|
Selwood L. The 7th Symposium on primary breast cancer in older women. Theme: involving the caregivers (Held: 1 March 2024). Future Oncol 2024:1-3. [PMID: 38913596 DOI: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2362615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
The 7th Symposium on Primary Breast Cancer in Older Women, hosted by the University of Nottingham in association with the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG), was held in the Jubilee Conference Centre in Nottingham on 1 March 2024. With the theme of 'involving the caregivers', topics included: barriers to clinical trial participation among older women, the use of geriatric assessment tools to tailor treatments to individual patient's level of frailty and interventions such as medication review and de-prescription to reduce toxicity and increase compliance with treatment.The symposium began with an upbeat introduction from the symposium chair, Kwok-Leung Cheung (Professor of Breast Surgery and Medical Education, University of Nottingham, Consultant Breast Surgeon, Royal Derby Hospital; UK National Representative, SIOG). Cheung welcomed attendees and contributors from a wide range of disciplines including surgeons, geriatricians, clinical nurse specialists, pharmacists and patient representatives.Cheung outlined how this biennial symposium, the only one of its kind to focus on primary breast cancer in older women, had grown in both size and ambition since its inception in 2010. For the first time, this year's proceedings included a dedicated multidisciplinary team discussion of geriatric breast cancer cases submitted by delegates.The main theme of the day's proceedings "involving the caregivers" was also emphasized in the introductory comments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Selwood
- Taylor & Francis, 240 Blackfriars Road, London, SE1 8BU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Slaaen M, Røyset IM, Saltvedt I, Grønberg BH, Halsteinli V, Døhl Ø, Vossius C, Kirkevold Ø, Bergh S, Rostoft S, Oldervoll L, Bye A, Melby L, Røsstad T, Eriksen GF, Sollid MIV, Rolfson D, Šaltytė Benth J. Geriatric assessment with management for older patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy: a cluster-randomised controlled pilot study. BMC Med 2024; 22:232. [PMID: 38853251 PMCID: PMC11163782 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03446-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Geriatric assessment and management (GAM) improve outcomes in older patients with cancer treated with surgery or chemotherapy. It is unclear whether GAM may provide better function and quality of life (QoL), or be cost-effective, in a radiotherapy (RT) setting. METHODS In this Norwegian cluster-randomised controlled pilot study, we assessed the impact of a GAM intervention involving specialist and primary health services. It was initiated in-hospital at the start of RT by assessing somatic and mental health, function, and social situation, followed by individually adapted management plans and systematic follow-up in the municipalities until 8 weeks after the end of RT, managed by municipal nurses as patients' care coordinators. Thirty-two municipal/city districts were 1:1 randomised to intervention or conventional care. Patients with cancer ≥ 65 years, referred for RT, were enrolled irrespective of cancer type, treatment intent, and frailty status, and followed the allocation of their residential district. The primary outcome was physical function measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (QLQ-C30). Secondary outcomes were overall quality of life (QoL), physical performance, use and costs of health services. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. Study registration at ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03881137. RESULTS We included 178 patients, 89 in each group with comparable age (mean 74.1), sex (female 38.2%), and Edmonton Frail Scale scores (mean 3.4 [scale 0-17], scores 0-3 [fit] in 57%). More intervention patients received curative RT (76.4 vs 61.8%), had higher irradiation doses (mean 54.1 vs 45.5 Gy), and longer lasting RT (mean 4.4 vs 3.6 weeks). The primary outcome was completed by 91% (intervention) vs 88% (control) of patients. No significant differences between groups on predefined outcomes were observed. GAM costs represented 3% of health service costs for the intervention group during the study period. CONCLUSIONS In this heterogeneous cohort of older patients receiving RT, the majority was fit. We found no impact of the intervention on patient-centred outcomes or the cost of health services. Targeting a more homogeneous group of only pre-frail and frail patients is strongly recommended in future studies needed to clarify the role and organisation of GAM in RT settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marit Slaaen
- The Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Box 68, 2312, Ottestad, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Pb 1171 Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway
| | - Inga Marie Røyset
- The Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Box 68, 2312, Ottestad, Norway.
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), N-7491, Trondheim, Norway.
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Clinic of Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Box 3250 Torgarden , Trondheim, NO-7006, Norway.
| | - Ingvild Saltvedt
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), N-7491, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Clinic of Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Box 3250 Torgarden , Trondheim, NO-7006, Norway
| | - Bjørn Henning Grønberg
- Department of Oncology, St. Olav Hospital, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Box 3250 Torgarden , Trondheim, NO-7006, Norway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Vidar Halsteinli
- Regional Center for Health Care Improvement, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Box 3250 Torgarden , Trondheim, NO-7006, Norway
| | - Øystein Døhl
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), N-7491, Trondheim, Norway
- Trondheim Municipality, Trondheim Kommune, Postboks , Trondheim, Norway
| | - Corinna Vossius
- The Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Box 68, 2312, Ottestad, Norway
- Centre for Age-Related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Øyvind Kirkevold
- The Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Box 68, 2312, Ottestad, Norway
- Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Postboks , Tønsberg, 2136, 3103, Norway
- Department of Health Sciences in Gjøvik, NTNU, Box 191, N-2802, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Sverre Bergh
- The Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Box 68, 2312, Ottestad, Norway
- Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Postboks , Tønsberg, 2136, 3103, Norway
| | - Siri Rostoft
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Pb 1171 Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Pb , Nydalen, Norway
| | - Line Oldervoll
- Center for Crisis Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, 7807, 5020, Bergen, PB, Norway
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, 8905, 7491, Trondheim, PB, Norway
| | - Asta Bye
- Oslo Metropolitan University (Oslomet), Postboks 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130, Oslo, Norway
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Oslo, and, Oslo University Hospital, Nydalen, Norway
| | - Line Melby
- Department of Health Sciences in Gjøvik, NTNU, Box 191, N-2802, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Tove Røsstad
- Trondheim Municipality, Trondheim Kommune, Postboks , Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, 8905, 7491, Trondheim, PB, Norway
| | - Guro Falk Eriksen
- The Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Box 68, 2312, Ottestad, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Pb 1171 Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hamar Hospital, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Skolegata 32, 2318, Hamar, Norway
| | - May Ingvild Volungholen Sollid
- The Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Box 68, 2312, Ottestad, Norway
- Department of Health Sciences in Gjøvik, NTNU, Box 191, N-2802, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Darryl Rolfson
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Clinical Sciences Building, University of Alberta, 1-19811350 83 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P4, Canada
| | - Jūratė Šaltytė Benth
- The Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Box 68, 2312, Ottestad, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Campus Ahus, P.O.Box 1171, 0318, Blindern, Norway
- Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, P.O.Box 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
O’Donnell CDJ, Hubbard J, Jin Z. Updates on the Management of Colorectal Cancer in Older Adults. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1820. [PMID: 38791899 PMCID: PMC11120096 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant global health challenge. Notably, the risk of CRC escalates with age, with the majority of cases occurring in those over the age of 65. Despite recent progress in tailoring treatments for early and advanced CRC, there is a lack of prospective data to guide the management of older patients, who are frequently underrepresented in clinical trials. This article reviews the contemporary landscape of managing older individuals with CRC, highlighting recent advancements and persisting challenges. The role of comprehensive geriatric assessment is explored. Opportunities for treatment escalation/de-escalation, with consideration of the older adult's fitness level. are reviewed in the neoadjuvant, surgical, adjuvant, and metastatic settings of colon and rectal cancers. Immunotherapy is shown to be an effective treatment option in older adults who have CRC with microsatellite instability. Promising new technologies such as circulating tumor DNA and recent phase III trials adding later-line systemic therapy options are discussed. Clinical recommendations based on the data available are summarized. We conclude that deliberate efforts to include older individuals in future colorectal cancer trials are essential to better guide the management of these patients in this rapidly evolving field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor D. J. O’Donnell
- Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Education, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Building, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Joleen Hubbard
- Allina Health Cancer Institute, Minneapolis, MN 55407, USA
| | - Zhaohui Jin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Guven DC, Martinez-Cannon BA, Testa GD, Martins JC, Velasco RN, Kalsi T, Gomes F. Immunotherapy use in older adults with cancer with frailty: A young SIOG review paper. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101742. [PMID: 38472009 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became a treatment option in most tumor types and improved survival in patients with cancer in the last decade. Older patients with cancer are underrepresented in the pivotal clinical trials with ICIs. Older patients with cancer often have significant comorbidities and geriatric syndromes like frailty, which can complicate cancer care and treatment decisions. Frailty is among the most prevalent geriatric syndromes in patients with cancer and could lead to inferior survival and a higher risk of complications in patients treated with chemotherapy. However, the effect of frailty on the efficacy and safety of ICIs is understudied. This review focuses on the available evidence regarding the association between frailty and ICI efficacy and safety. Although the survival benefits of ICIs have generally been shown to be independent of age, the available real-world data has generally suggested higher rates of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and treatment discontinuation in older patients. While international organizations recommend conducting a comprehensive geriatric assessment CGA to assess and address frailty before the start of anti-cancer therapies, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or higher is frequently used in clinical practice as synonymous with frailty, albeit with significant limitations. The available data has generally demonstrated diminished ICI efficacy in patients with an ECOG 2 or higher compared to patients with better performance status, while the incidence of high-grade irAEs were similar. Whilst evidence regarding outcomes with ICI in older patients and in those with sub-optimal performance status is growing, there is very limited data specifically evaluating the role of frailty with ICIs. These studies found a shortened overall survival, yet no evidence of a lower response rate to ICIs. These patients experienced more AEs, but they did not necessarily have a higher incidence of irAEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deniz Can Guven
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Health Sciences University, Elazig City Hospital, Elazig, Turkey.
| | | | - Giuseppe Dario Testa
- Division of Geriatric and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Florence and Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50139 Florence, Italy
| | | | - Rogelio N Velasco
- Clinical Trial and Research Division, Philippine Heart Center, Quezon City, Philippines
| | - Tania Kalsi
- Department of Ageing and Health, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Fabio Gomes
- Medical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Voorend CG, Berkhout-Byrne NC, van Bodegom-Vos L, Diepenbroek A, Franssen CF, Joosten H, Mooijaart SP, Bos WJW, van Buren M. Geriatric Assessment in CKD Care: An Implementation Study. Kidney Med 2024; 6:100809. [PMID: 38660344 PMCID: PMC11039322 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Rationale & Objective Older people with progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) have complex health care needs. Geriatric evaluation preceding decision making for kidney replacement is recommended in guidelines, but implementation is lacking in routine care. We aimed to evaluate implementation of geriatric assessment in CKD care. Study Design Mixed methods implementation study. Setting & Participants Dutch nephrology centers were approached for implementation of geriatric assessment in patients aged ≥70 years and with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≤20 mL/min/1.73 m2. Quality Improvement Activities/Exposure We implemented a consensus-based nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment: a patient questionnaire and professionally administered test set comprising 16 instruments covering functional, cognitive, psychosocial, and somatic domains and patient-reported outcome measures. Outcomes We aimed for implementation in 10 centers and 200 patients. Implementation was evaluated by (i) perceived enablers and barriers of implementation, including integration in work routines (Normalization Measure Development Tool) and (ii) relevance of the instruments to routine care for the target population. Analytical Approach Variations in implementation practices were described based on field notes. The postimplementation survey among health care professionals was analyzed descriptively, using an explanatory qualitative approach for open-ended questions. Results Geriatric assessment was implemented in 10 centers among 191 patients. Survey respondents (n = 71, 88% response rate) identified determinants that facilitated implementation, ie, multidisciplinary collaboration (with geriatricians) -meetings and reports and execution of assessments by nurses. Barriers to implementation were patient illiteracy or language barrier, time constraints, and patient burden. Professionals considered geriatric assessment sufficiently integrated into work routines (mean, 6.7/10 ± 2.0 [SD]) but also subject to improvement. Likewise, the relevance of geriatric assessment for routine care was scored as 7.8/10 ± 1.2. The Clinical Frailty Score and Montreal Cognitive Assessment were perceived as the most relevant instruments. Limitations Selection bias of interventions' early adopters may limit generalizability. Conclusions Geriatric assessment could successfully be integrated in CKD care and was perceived relevant to health care professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlijn G.N. Voorend
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Noeleen C. Berkhout-Byrne
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Leti van Bodegom-Vos
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Adry Diepenbroek
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Casper F.M. Franssen
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke Joosten
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section Geriatric Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Simon P. Mooijaart
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- LUMC Center for Medicine for Older People, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Willem Jan W. Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn van Buren
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Paredero-Pérez I, Jimenez-Fonseca P, Cano JM, Arrazubi V, Carmona-Bayonas A, Covela-Rúa M, Fernández-Montes A, Martín-Richard M, Gironés-Sarrió R. State of the scientific evidence and recommendations for the management of older patients with gastric cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101657. [PMID: 37957106 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Gastric cancer is one of the most frequent and deadly tumours worldwide. However, the evidence that currently exists for the treatment of older adults is limited and is derived mainly from clinical trials in which older patients are poorly represented. In this article, a group of experts selected from the Oncogeriatrics Section of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), the Spanish Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours (TTD), and the Spanish Multidisciplinary Group on Digestive Cancer (GEMCAD) reviews the existing scientific evidence for older patients (≥65 years old) with gastric cancer and establishes a series of recommendations that allow optimization of management during all phases of the disease. Geriatric assessment (GA) and a multidisciplinary approach should be fundamental parts of the process. In early stages, endoscopic submucosal resection or laparoscopic gastrectomy is recommended depending on the stage. In locally advanced stage, the tolerability of triplet regimens has been established; however, as in the metastatic stage, platinum- and fluoropyrimidine-based regimens with the possibility of lower dose intensity are recommended resulting in similar efficacy. Likewise, the administration of trastuzumab, ramucirumab and immunotherapy for unresectable metastatic or locally advanced disease is safe. Supportive treatment acquires special importance in a population with different life expectancies than at a younger age. It is essential to consider the general state of the patient and the psychosocial dimension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Paredero-Pérez
- Lluís Alcanyís de Játiva Hospital, Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, Valencia, Spain
| | - Paula Jimenez-Fonseca
- Asturias Central University Hospital (HUCA), Health Research Institute of the Principality of Asturias (ISPA), Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours (TTD), Oviedo, Spain
| | - Juana María Cano
- Ciudad Real University Hospital, Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, Ciudad Real, Spain.
| | - Virginia Arrazubi
- Navarra University Hospital, Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Alberto Carmona-Bayonas
- IMIB Morales Meseguer University Hospital, Murcia University (UMU), Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, Murcia, Spain
| | - Marta Covela-Rúa
- Lucus Agusti University Hospital (HULA), Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, Lugo, Spain
| | - Ana Fernández-Montes
- Ourense University Hospital Complex (CHUO), Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, Orense, Spain
| | - Marta Martín-Richard
- Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) - Duran i Reynals University Hospital, Multidisciplinary Spanish Group of Digestive Cancer (GEMCAD), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Regina Gironés-Sarrió
- Polytechnic la Fe University Hospital, Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lane H, Saunders R, Crookes K, Ang SGM, Bulsara C, Bulsara MK, Ewens B, Gallagher O, Gullick K, Haydon S, Hughes J, Nguyen KH, Seaman K, Etherton-Beer C. Prevalence of frailty and pain in hospitalised cancer patients: implications for older adult care. Intern Med J 2024; 54:671-674. [PMID: 38450876 DOI: 10.1111/imj.16351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
A hospital-wide point prevalence study investigated frailty and pain in patients with a cancer-related admission. Modifiable factors associated with frailty in people with cancer were determined through logistic regression. Forty-eight patients (19%) with cancer-related admissions were 2.65 times more likely to be frail and 2.12 more likely to have moderate pain. Frailty and pain were highly prevalent among cancer-related admissions, reinforcing the need for frailty screening and importance of pain assessment for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Lane
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Rosemary Saunders
- Centre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kate Crookes
- Centre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Seng G M Ang
- Centre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Caroline Bulsara
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Max K Bulsara
- Institute for Health Research, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Beverley Ewens
- Centre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Olivia Gallagher
- Centre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Karen Gullick
- Hollywood Private Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sue Haydon
- Hollywood Private Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jeff Hughes
- Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- PainChek Ltd, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kim-Huong Nguyen
- Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Karla Seaman
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hatlevoll I, Kristensen AK, Solheim TS, Elvebakken H, Salvesen Ø, Oldervoll LM, Wibe A, Hofsli E. Do older patients with colorectal cancer experience more deterioration in health-related quality of life than younger patients during the first year of palliative chemotherapy? A prospective real-world observational study. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101715. [PMID: 38359528 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The primary aim was to evaluate changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a real-life population among younger (< 70 years) and older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) during the first year of palliative chemotherapy. The secondary aims were to assess the impact of chemo-break on HRQoL and to report overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed mCRC, ≥ 18 years, and scheduled for first line palliative chemotherapy were included in this multicentre longitudinal observational study. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (0-100) was filled in at baseline and every second month. Changes or differences in QoL scores of >20, 10-20, and 5-10 points were considered to be of large, moderate, and small clinical magnitude, respectively. Comparing means of different QoL scores between groups or over time, a threshold of 5-10 was considered the minimally important difference (MID). Treatments, patient characteristics, and tumour characteristics were prospectively registered. RESULTS A total of 214 patients were included, and 146 were alive after one year. Four months after start of treatment, large deteriorations in fatigue and physical functioning were reported by 40% and 25% of the patients, respectively. Changes in global QoL, physical functioning, role functioning, fatigue, pain, and nausea/vomiting were not significantly different between the age groups and reached baseline levels after one year. Patients on chemo-break reported significant improvements in several HRQoL domains. Median OS was 17.5 months [95% confidence interval 14.4-20.5] with no difference between younger and older patients. DISCUSSION Older patients did not experience more deterioration in HRQoL than younger patients during the first year of palliative chemotherapy. Measures to mitigate the deteriorations in fatigue and physical functioning observed during the first months of palliative treatment are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02395224, March 23, 2015, retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingunn Hatlevoll
- Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Oncology, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
| | | | - Tora S Solheim
- Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Oncology, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Hege Elvebakken
- Department of Oncology, Ålesund Hospital, Møre og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Øyvind Salvesen
- Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Line M Oldervoll
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Center for Crisis Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - Arne Wibe
- Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Surgery, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Eva Hofsli
- Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Oncology, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Daviu Cobián C, Oreskov JO, Blaakaer J, Jespersen E, Jørgensen TL, Ryg J, Herrstedt J, Høgdall C, Lund CM, Seibæk L, Vinther A, Ekmann-Gade AW, Schnack TH. Impact of FRAilty screening and Geriatric assessment and INtervention in older patients with epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A multicenter randomized clinical trial protocol (FRAGINOC). J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101713. [PMID: 38326125 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radical surgery combined with chemotherapy is the only potential curative treatment of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, 43% of older Danish patients with EOC are not referred to surgery due to frailty, age, or fear of complications. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has demonstrated ability to reduce frailty in older patients, but there is a knowledge gap regarding its effect before or during treatment in older adults with EOC. This protocol presents a randomized controlled trial (RCT), which evaluates the effect of CGA-based interventions including individualized physical exercise therapy in older adults with EOC during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). MATERIALS AND METHODS This RCT will include patients aged ≥70 years with primary EOC referred to NACT. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to intervention or standard of care, along with neoadjuvant antineoplastic treatment. Stratification for performance status and center of inclusion will be performed. In the intervention arm, a geriatrician will perform CGA and corresponding geriatric interventions and patients will undergo an individualized home-based exercise program managed by a physiotherapist. All patients will be evaluated with Geriatric-8, modified Geriatric-8, clinical frailty scale, and physical tests at randomization. Predictive values (positive/negative) will be evaluated for CGA detected impairments. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients referred to interval debulking surgery (IDS). Secondary endpoints include the proportion who complete oncological treatment, improvements in physical tests, quality of life measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life questionnaires at inclusion, after three cycles of chemotherapy, and at end of chemotherapy treatment. Furthermore, the association between results of geriatric screening tests, CGA, and physical tests with complication rate and progression free survival will be examined. The primary outcome will be analyzed with logistic regression in the intention-to-treat population. Power calculations reveal the need to enroll 216 patients. DISCUSSION The present study examines whether CGA-based interventions including individualized physical exercise can increase the referral rate for potential curative IDS in older patients with EOC. If successful, this will result in more patients undergoing surgery and completing chemotherapy, preventing complications, and ultimately improving quality of life and survival. The study setup may establish the basis for direct clinical implementation if proven effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Daviu Cobián
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Jakob O Oreskov
- Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Jan Blaakaer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Eva Jespersen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Trine L Jørgensen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Jesper Ryg
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Jørn Herrstedt
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Claus Høgdall
- Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Cecilia M Lund
- Department of Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Denmark
| | - Lene Seibæk
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anders Vinther
- Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark; Hospital Secretariat and Communications, Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Anne Weng Ekmann-Gade
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Tine H Schnack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Guo S, Monginot S, Jin R, Alibhai SMH, Norman R. Improving timeliness to initial assessment in a geriatric oncology clinic: A quality improvement project. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101707. [PMID: 38326124 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Selynne Guo
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada.
| | - Susie Monginot
- Department of Nursing, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Rana Jin
- Department of Nursing, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Shabbir M H Alibhai
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network/Sinai Health System, Canada; University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Richard Norman
- University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Health Network/Sinai Health System, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ioffe D, Bhatia-Patel SC, Gandhi S, Hamad EA, Dotan E. Cardiovascular Concerns, Cancer Treatment, and Biological and Chronological Aging in Cancer: JACC Family Series. JACC CardioOncol 2024; 6:143-158. [PMID: 38774000 PMCID: PMC11103051 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2024.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer are leading causes of death globally, particularly among the rapidly growing population of older adults (OAs). CVD is a leading cause of mortality among cancer survivors, often accelerated by cancer treatments associated with short- or long-term cardiotoxicity. Moreover, there is a dynamic relationship among CVD, cancer, and aging, characterized by shared risk factors and biological hallmarks, that plays an important role in caring for OAs, optimizing treatment approaches, and developing preventive strategies. Assessment of geriatric domains (eg, functional status, comorbidities, cognition, polypharmacy, nutritional status, social support, psychological well-being) is critical to individualizing treatment of OAs with cancer. The authors discuss considerations in caring for an aging population with cancer, including methods for the assessment of OAs with CVD and/or cardiovascular risk factors planned for cancer therapy. Multidisciplinary care is critical in optimizing patient outcomes and maintaining quality of life in this growing vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Ioffe
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Sakshi Gandhi
- Department of Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Eman A. Hamad
- Department of Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Efrat Dotan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Strohschein FJ, Qi S, Davidson S, Link C, Watson L. A Retrospective Age Analysis of the Ambulatory Oncology Patient Satisfaction Survey: Differences in Satisfaction across Dimensions of Person-Centred Care and Unmet Needs among Older Adults Receiving Cancer Treatment. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:1483-1503. [PMID: 38534946 PMCID: PMC10969488 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31030113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2024] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Over half of all new cancer cases in Alberta are diagnosed among people aged 65+ years, a group that encompasses vast variation. Patient-reported experience measures are routinely collected within Cancer Care Alberta; however, the specific consideration of the needs and concerns of older Albertans with cancer is lacking. In 2021, 2204 adults who had received treatment at a cancer centre in Alberta completed the Ambulatory Oncology Patient Satisfaction Survey (AOPSS). In this study, we explored the age differences in satisfaction across six dimensions of person-centred care and in the proportions of unmet needs across eight types of issues, with specific attention to older adults. Using three age groups (18-39, 40-64, 65+), only the physical comfort dimension showed significantly lower satisfaction among those aged 65+ years. Using five age groups (18-39, 40-64, 65-74, 75-84, 85+), significantly lower levels of satisfaction were found related to 'physical comfort' for those aged 65-74 and 75-84, 'coordination and continuity of care' for those aged 75-84 and 85+, and 'information, communication, and education' for those aged 85+. Therefore, grouping together all older adults aged 65+ years obscured lower levels of satisfaction with some dimensions of person-centred care among those aged 75-84 and 85+ years. Unmet needs generally increased with age for all types of issues, with significant differences across age groups for emotional, financial, social/family, and sexual health issues. The lower levels of satisfaction and higher proportions of unmet needs call for tailored interventions to promote optimal care experiences and outcomes among older adults receiving cancer care in Alberta and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fay J. Strohschein
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
- Cancer Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB T5J 3E4, Canada
| | - Siwei Qi
- Applied Research & Patient Experience, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada
| | - Sandra Davidson
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Claire Link
- Applied Research & Patient Experience, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada
| | - Linda Watson
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
- Applied Research & Patient Experience, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mizutani T, Cheung KL, Hakobyan Y, Lane H, Decoster L, Karnakis T, Puts M, Calderon O, Jørgensen TL, Boulahssass R, Wedding U, Karampeazis A, Chan WWL, Banerjee J, Falci C, van Leeuwen BL, Fonseca V, Gironés Sarrió R, Vetter M, Dougoud V, Naeim A, Ashman J, Musolino N, Kanesvaran R. Leave no one behind: A global survey of the current state of geriatric oncology practice by SIOG national representatives. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101709. [PMID: 38310661 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations include a commitment to "leave no one behind" as a universal goal. To achieve this in geriatric oncology (GO) worldwide, it is important to understand the current state of GO at an international level. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) has several National Representatives (NRs) who act as SIOG's delegates in their respective countries. The NRs took part in this international survey exploring the state of GO practice, identifying barriers and solutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS The NRs answered open-ended questions by email from February 2020 to October 2022. The questionnaire domains included the demographic information of older adults for their countries, and the NRs' opinions on whether GO is developing, what the barriers are to developing GO, and proposed actions to remove these barriers. The demographic data of each country reported in the survey was adjusted using literature and database searches. RESULTS Twenty-one of thirty countries with NRs (70%) participated in this questionnaire study: 12 European, four Asian, two North American, two South American, and one Oceanian. The proportion of the population aged ≥75 years varied from 2.2% to 15.8%, and the average life expectancy also varied from 70 years to 86 years. All NRs reported that GO was developing in their country; four NRs (18%) reported that GO was well developed. Although all NRs agreed that geriatric assessment was useful, only three reported that it was used day-to-day in their countries' clinical practice (14%). The major barriers identified were the lack of (i) evidence to support GO use, (ii) awareness and interest in GO, and (iii) resources (time, manpower, and funding). The major proposed actions were to (i) provide new evidence through clinical trials specific for GO patients, (ii) stimulate awareness through networking, and (iii) deliver educational materials and information to healthcare providers and medical students. DISCUSSION This current survey has identified the barriers to GO and proposed actions that could remove them. Broader awareness seems to be essential to implementing GO. Additional actions are needed to develop GO within countries and can be supported through international partnerships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomonori Mizutani
- Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kwok-Leung Cheung
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Yervand Hakobyan
- Hematology Center after Prof. Yeolyan, Hematology and Transfusion Medicine department of NIH Armenia, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Heather Lane
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Geriatric and Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Perth, Australia
| | - Lore Decoster
- UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Medical Oncology, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Theodora Karnakis
- The Cancer Institute of the State of São Paulo/University, Division of Geriatric Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Martine Puts
- University of Toronto, Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, Toronto, Canada
| | - Oscar Calderon
- Clínica Alemana de Santiago and Complejo Asistencial Dr. Sótero del Río, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Santiago, Chile
| | | | | | - Ulrich Wedding
- University Hospital Jena, Department of Palliative Care, Jena, Germany
| | | | | | - Joyita Banerjee
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Geriatric Medicine, New Delhi, India
| | - Cristina Falci
- Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Barbara L van Leeuwen
- University medical center Groningen, Department of Surgery, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Vasco Fonseca
- Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Department of Oncology, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Regina Gironés Sarrió
- Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La FE, Department of Medical Oncology, Valencia, Spain
| | - Marcus Vetter
- Affiliation Cancer Center Baselland, Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland
| | - Vérène Dougoud
- The HFR Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Arash Naeim
- UCLA and Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, Departments of Medicine and Bioengineering, Calfornia, United States
| | - Jed Ashman
- Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham City Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; International Society of Geriatric Oncology, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Najia Musolino
- International Society of Geriatric Oncology, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ravindran Kanesvaran
- National Cancer Centre Singapore, Department of Medical Oncology, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Stevens S, Nindra U, Shahnam A, Wei J, Bray V, Pal A, Yip PY, Linton A, Blinman P, Nagrial A, Lee J, Boyer M, Kao S. Real world efficacy and toxicity of consolidation durvalumab following chemoradiotherapy in older Australian patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101705. [PMID: 38290173 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Consolidation durvalumab following platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) significantly improved overall survival for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the PACIFIC trial. However, older patients were underrepresented in PACIFIC, and subsequent analyses suggested trends toward poorer survival and increased toxicity in patients aged ≥70 years old. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of consolidation durvalumab following CRT in older Australian patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective observational study was conducted across seven sites in Sydney, Australia between January 2018 and September 2021. All adult patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who received platinum-based chemoradiotherapy followed by at least one cycle of consolidation durvalumab were included. Older patients were defined as being ≥70 years old. RESULTS Of 152 patients included in the analysis, 42.8% (n = 67) patients were 70 years or older. Median follow-up was 26.1 months. The two-year overall survival and median PFS was similar between older and younger patients. At two years, 74.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 65.4-84.2%) of patients <70 years old and 65.2% (95% CI: 53.4-77.0%) of older patients were alive (p = 0.07; hazard ratio [HR] 1.64, 95% CI: 0.95-2.81). Median progression-free survival (PFS) in patients <70 years was 30.3 months (95% CI: 22.2-38.4 months) compared with 26.7 months (95% CI: 12.8-40.6 months) in older patients (p = 0.22; HR 1.46, 95% CI: 0.80-2.65). Toxicity was also similar, with 11.5% of patients <70 years old and 18.5% of older patients experiencing grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs; p = 0.23); 16.1% and 24.6% of the patients, respectively, discontinued treatment due to toxicity (p = 0.19). Grade 3-4 AEs and treatment discontinuation were associated with Charlson Comorbidity Index >5 (p = 0.011) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis at presentation (p = 0.002), respectively. DISCUSSION Older Australian patients receiving consolidation durvalumab following CRT experienced comparable outcomes to their younger peers. Comorbidity burden may be more important determinants of treatment tolerance than chronological age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Stevens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, 119-143 Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Concord Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Hospital Road, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia; School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.
| | - Udit Nindra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Cnr Elizabeth and Goulburn Street, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia; School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Level 2, AGSM Building, Gate 11 Botany Street, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Adel Shahnam
- Department of Medical Oncology, Crown Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Cnr Hawkesbury and Darcy Road, Westmead, NSW, Australia, 2145
| | - Joe Wei
- Department of Medical Oncology, Crown Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Cnr Hawkesbury and Darcy Road, Westmead, NSW, Australia, 2145; School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Victoria Bray
- Department of Medical Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Cnr Elizabeth and Goulburn Street, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
| | - Abhijit Pal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Cnr Elizabeth and Goulburn Street, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Sydney, Eldrige Road, Bankstown, NSW 2200, Australia
| | - Po Yee Yip
- Department of Medical Oncology, Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, Therry Road, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia
| | - Anthony Linton
- Department of Medical Oncology, Concord Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Hospital Road, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia; School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Prunella Blinman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Concord Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Hospital Road, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia; School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Adnan Nagrial
- Department of Medical Oncology, Crown Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Cnr Hawkesbury and Darcy Road, Westmead, NSW, Australia, 2145; Department of Medical Oncology, Blacktown Cancer and Haematology Centre, Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, 18 Blacktown Road, Blacktown, NSW 2148, Australia; School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Jenny Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, 119-143 Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; Macquarie Medical School, Macquarie University, Wallumattagal Campus, Macquarie, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Michael Boyer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, 119-143 Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Steven Kao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, 119-143 Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Extermann M, Artz A, Rebollo MA, Klepin HD, Krug U, Loh KP, Mims AS, Neuendorff N, Santini V, Stauder R, Vey N. Treating acute myelogenous leukemia in patients aged 70 and above: Recommendations from the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG). J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101626. [PMID: 37741771 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment is challenging in older patients. There is a lack of evidence-based recommendations for older patients ≥70, a group largely underrepresented in clinical trials. With new treatment options being available in recent years, recommendations are needed for these patients. As such the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) assembled a task force to review the evidence specific to treatment and outcomes in this population of patients ≥70 years. Six questions were selected by the expert panel in domains of (1) baseline assessment, (2) frontline therapy, (3) post-remission therapy, (4) treatment for relapse, (5) targeted therapies, and (6) patient reported outcome/function and enhancing treatment tolerance. Information from current literature was extracted, combining evidence from systematic reviews/meta-analyses, decision models, individual trials targeting these patients, and subgroup data. Accordingly, recommendations were generated using a GRADE approach upon reviewing current evidence by consensus of the whole panel. It is our firm recommendation and hope that direct evidence should be generated for patients aged ≥70 as a distinct group in high need of improvement of their survival outcomes. Such studies should integrate information from a geriatric assessment to optimize external validity and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martine Extermann
- Senior Adult Oncology Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - Andrew Artz
- Division of Leukemia, Department of Hematology & Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Maite Antonio Rebollo
- Institut Català d'Oncologia, Oncohematogeriatrics Unit, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Heidi D Klepin
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Hematology and Oncology, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Utz Krug
- Klinikum Leverkusen, Department of Medicine 3, Leverkusen, Germany
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Alice S Mims
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Nina Neuendorff
- University Hospital Essen, Department of Hematology and Stem-Cell Transplantation, Essen, Germany
| | - Valeria Santini
- MDS Unit, AOUC, Hematology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Reinhard Stauder
- Department of Internal Medicine V (Hematology Oncology), Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Norbert Vey
- Aix-Marseille University, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Hematology Department, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mattila KE, Vihinen H, Heervä E, Nuotio MS, Vihinen P. The impact of prognostic factors and comorbidities on survival in older adults with stage I - III cutaneous melanoma in Southwest Finland: A register study. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101701. [PMID: 38219332 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite being diagnosed with thicker and more often ulcerated melanomas, cancer-specific survival (CSS) is not necessarily inferior in older adults with melanoma compared to younger patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Our aim was to evaluate the impact of baseline melanoma-specific prognostic factors and comorbidities on recurrence-free survival (RFS), CSS, and overall survival (OS) in patients aged 70-79 (n = 474) and ≥ 80 years (n = 286) with resected stage I - III cutaneous melanoma in Southwest Finland between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2020. Patients were restaged according to the 8th edition of TNM classification, and comorbidities were assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). RESULTS Patients aged ≥80 years had thicker and more commonly ulcerated melanomas: 43.0%, 40.9%, and 16.1% of patients aged ≥80 and 56.5%, 25.3%, and 18.1% of patients aged 70-79 years were diagnosed with stage I, II, and III melanoma, respectively. Multiple comorbidities (CCI ≥2) were more common and sentinel lymph node biopsy less frequently performed in patients aged ≥80 years. RFS and CSS were similar in patients aged 70-79 years and ≥ 80 years: median RFS 13.8 years vs not reached, with the hazard ratio of melanoma recurrence or death from melanoma 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-1.71); median CSS was not reached, with the hazard ratio of death from melanoma 1.12 (95%CI: 0.81-1.75). The proportion of patients who were alive with melanoma recurrence or had died from melanoma was similar in both age groups. In multivariable analysis, higher pathological stage was the only independent risk factor for short RFS regardless of age group, sex, CCI, and tumor ulceration. Higher stage and male sex were associated with short CSS. Age ≥ 80 years, stage III disease, and CCI ≥ 2 were associated with short OS and female sex with long OS in multivariable analysis. DISCUSSION Pathological stage was the most influential factor determining RFS and CSS in older adults with resected stage I - III melanoma. Concerning OS, age ≥ 80 years, stage III disease, and multiple comorbidities had a significant negative impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalle E Mattila
- Department of Oncology, Fican West Cancer Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Finland; InFLAMES Research Flagship Center, University of Turku, Finland.
| | - Helmi Vihinen
- Department of Oncology, Fican West Cancer Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Finland; Turku School of Economics, University of Turku, Finland
| | - Eetu Heervä
- InFLAMES Research Flagship Center, University of Turku, Finland
| | - Maria S Nuotio
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Finland
| | - Pia Vihinen
- Department of Oncology, Fican West Cancer Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Li H, Kilgour H, Leung B, Cho M, Pollock J, Culbertson S, Hedges P, Mariano C, Haase KR. Caring for older adults with cancer in Canada: Views from healthcare providers and cancer care allies in the community. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:157. [PMID: 38358430 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08303-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer is common and disproportionately impacts older adults. Moreover, cancer care of older adults is complex, and the current Canadian cancer care system struggles to address all of the dimensions. In this project, our goal was to understand the barriers and facilitators to caring for older adults with cancer from perspectives of healthcare professionals and cancer care allies, which included community groups, seniors' centers, and other community-based supports. METHODS In collaboration with a patient advisory board, we conducted focus groups and interviews with multiple local healthcare professionals and cancer care allies in British Columbia, Canada. We used a descriptive qualitative approach and conducted a thematic analysis using NVivo software. RESULTS A total of 71 participants of various disciplines and cancer care allies participated. They identified both individual and system-level barriers. Priority system-level barriers for older adults included space and staffing constraints and disconnections within healthcare systems, and between healthcare practitioners and cancer care allies. Individual-level barriers relate to the complex health states of older adults, caregiver/support person needs, and the needs of an increasingly diverse population where English may not be a first or preferable language. CONCLUSIONS This study identified key barriers and facilitators that demonstrate aligned priorities among a diverse group of healthcare practitioners and cancer care allies. In conjunction with perspectives from patients and caregivers, these findings will inform future improvements in cancer care. Namely, we emphasize the importance of connections among health systems and community networks, given the outpatient nature of cancer care and the needs of older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Li
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Heather Kilgour
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Bonnie Leung
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Michelle Cho
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Kristen R Haase
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wu TC, Farrell MJ, Karimi-Mostowfi N, Chaballout BH, Akingbemi WO, Grogan TR, Raldow AC. Evaluating the Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Health-Related Quality of Life Disparities in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: A SEER-MHOS National Database Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024; 33:254-260. [PMID: 38015776 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear whether health-related quality of life (HRQOL) disparities exist between racial/ethnic groups in older patients with esophageal cancer, pre- and post-diagnosis. METHODS Using the SEER-MHOS (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare Health Outcomes Survey) national database, we included patients ages 65-years-old or greater with esophageal cancer diagnosed from 1996 to 2017. HRQOL data within 36 months before and after diagnosis were measured by the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores from the SF-36 and VR-12 instruments. Total combined score (TCS) was reflected by both PCS and MCS. RESULTS We identified 1,312 patients, with evaluable data on 873 patients pre-diagnosis and 439 post-diagnosis. On pre-diagnosis cohort MVA, the MCS was better for White over Hispanic patients (54.1 vs. 48.6, P = 0.012). On post-diagnosis cohort MVA, PCS was better for Hispanic compared with White (39.8 vs. 34.5, P = 0.036) patients, MCS was better for Asian compared with White (48.9 vs. 40.9, P = 0.034) patients, and TCS better for Asian compared with White (92.6 vs. 76.7, P = 0.003) patients. CONCLUSIONS In older patients with esophageal cancer, White patients had better mental HRQOL as compared with Hispanic patients pre-diagnosis. However, post-diagnosis, White patients had worse mental and physical HRQOL compared with Asian and Hispanic patients, respectively, suggesting a greater negative impact on self-reported HRQOL in White patients with esophageal cancer. IMPACT To our knowledge, this study is the first to explore HRQOL differences in patients with esophageal cancer of various racial and ethnic groups and warrants further validation in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trudy C Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Matthew J Farrell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Basil H Chaballout
- University of South Carolina, School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, South Carolina
| | | | - Tristan R Grogan
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ann C Raldow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Dufton PH, Tarasenko E, Midgley K, Lee K, Kelly R, Rodrigues J, Yates P, Arulananda S, Parakh S. Implementation of a nurse-led, multidisciplinary model of care for older adults with cancer: a process evaluation protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e077005. [PMID: 38296284 PMCID: PMC10828881 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer is predominantly a disease of older adults, with an increasing number of cancer diagnoses in individuals aged 65 or older. Multiple geriatric factors have been shown to impact patient outcomes in cancer treatment. However, oncology specialists are not well adapted to incorporate geriatric assessment into practice due to a lack of resources and knowledge of the specialty.The primary aim of this study is to implement and evaluate a nurse-led, multidisciplinary model of care for older adults with cancer at two public tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study will aim to assess 200 patients across 2 sites. Both sites will assess individuals with lung cancer; the second site will also include individuals with genitourinary, upper gastrointestinal and colorectal cancers.This process evaluation will use quantitative and qualitative methods to explore the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) of the nurse-led, multidisciplinary model of care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval and local governance approvals have been obtained by Austin Health and Monash Health Human Research Ethics committees. Dissemination will occur via publications, conferences, social medical and local engagement with clinicians, consumers and managers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Polly Hypatia Dufton
- Cancer Services, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elena Tarasenko
- Cancer Services, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Katrina Midgley
- Cancer Services, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kathryn Lee
- Department of Geriatric Medicine/Aged Care Services, Continuing Care Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ray Kelly
- Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeremy Rodrigues
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul Yates
- Department of Geriatric Medicine/Aged Care Services, Continuing Care Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Surein Arulananda
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sagun Parakh
- Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Centre at Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sahakyan Y, Li Q, Alibhai SM, Puts M, Yeretzian ST, Anwar MR, Brennenstuhl S, McLean B, Strohschein F, Tomlinson G, Wills A, Abrahamyan L. Cost-Utility Analysis of Geriatric Assessment and Management in Older Adults With Cancer: Economic Evaluation Within 5C Trial. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:59-69. [PMID: 37871266 PMCID: PMC10730076 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Geriatric assessment (GA) is a guideline-recommended approach to optimize cancer management in older adults. We conducted a cost-utility analysis alongside the 5C randomized controlled trial to compare GA and management (GAM) plus usual care (UC) against UC alone in older adults with cancer. METHODS The economic evaluation, conducted from societal and health care payer perspectives, used a 12-month time horizon. The Canadian 5C study randomly assigned patients to receive GAM or UC. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were measured using the EuroQol five dimension-5L questionnaire and health care utilization using cost diaries and chart reviews. We evaluated the incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) for the full sample and preselected subgroups. RESULTS A total of 350 patients were included, of whom 173 received GAM and 177 UC. At 12 months, the average QALYs per patient were 0.728 and 0.751 for GAM and UC, respectively (ΔQALY, -0.023 [95% CI, -0.076 to 0.028]). Considering a societal perspective, the total average costs (in 2021 Canadian dollars) per patient were $46,739 and $45,177 for GAM and UC, respectively (ΔCost, $1,563 [95% CI, -$6,583 to $10,403]). At a cost-effectiveness threshold of $50,000/QALY, GAM was not cost-effective compared with UC (INMB, -$2,713 [95% CI, -$11,767 to $5,801]). The INMB was positive ($2,984 [95% CI, -$7,050 to $14,179]; probability of being cost-effective, 72%) for patients treated with curative intent, but remained negative for patients treated with palliative intent (INMB, -$9,909 [95% CI, -$24,436 to $4,153]). Findings were similar considering a health care payer perspective. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first cost-utility analysis of GAM in cancer. GAM was cost-effective for patients with cancer treated with curative but not with palliative intent. The study provides further considerations for future adoption of GAM in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeva Sahakyan
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Qixuan Li
- Biostatistics Department, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shabbir M.H. Alibhai
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martine Puts
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shant T. Yeretzian
- Turpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Mohammed R. Anwar
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Brennenstuhl
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bianca McLean
- Department of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
| | - Fay Strohschein
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Cancer Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - George Tomlinson
- Biostatistics Department, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aria Wills
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lusine Abrahamyan
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Giger AKW, Ditzel HM, Ditzel HJ, Ewertz M, Jørgensen TL, Pfeiffer P, Lund CM, Ryg J. Effects of comprehensive geriatric assessment-guided interventions on physical performance and quality of life in older patients with advanced cancer: A randomized controlled trial (PROGNOSIS-RCT). J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101658. [PMID: 37939628 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older patients with frailty starting oncological treatment are at higher risk of experiencing declining physical performance, loss of independence, and quality of life (QoL). This study examines whether comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)-guided interventions added to standard oncological care can prevent declining physical performance and QoL in older patients with frailty initiating palliative treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients aged ≥70 years, with a Geriatric-8 score of ≤14, initiating palliative oncological treatment were enrolled in an open label randomized controlled trial and randomized 1:1 to receive either CGA-guided interventions in addition to oncological standard care or oncological care alone. Baseline characteristics, physical performance measures, and QoL questionnaires were retrieved before group allocation. CGA was performed using a fixed set of domains and validated tests by a geriatrician-led team. The primary endpoint, physical performance, was measured by the 30-s chair stand test (30s-CST) at three months. Additional outcomes included 30s-CST at six months, handgrip strength test, and QoL. Outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed regression models. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.org (NCT04686851). RESULTS From November 1, 2020 to May 31, 2022, 181 patients were included; 88 in the interventional arm and 93 in the control arm. Median age was 77 (interquartile range [IQR] 73-81) years, 69% were male, median Geriatric-8 score was 12 (IQR 10-13), 69% had a Performance Status of 0-1, and the median 30s-CST was 9 (IQR 5-11) repetitions. The between-group difference in 30s-CST at three months was 0.67 (95%CI: -0.94 - 2.29) and 1.57 (95%CI: -0.20 - 3.34) at six months, which were not statistically significant. Subgroup analysis including participants with a baseline Geriatric-8 of 12-14 found borderline significant between-group differences in 30s-CST scores at three and six months of 2.04 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.07 - 4.2, P = 0.06) and 2.25 (95%CI: 0.01-4.5, P = 0.05), respectively. No within-group or between-group differences in the summary score or the Elderly Functional Index score (measuring QoL) were found. DISCUSSION This study did not find significant between-group differences in the 30s-CST in older patients receiving palliative care. However, a tendency towards improved physical performance was seen in the least frail. These patients may represent a target group wherein CGA interventions provide particular benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Kristine W Giger
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; OPEN, Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Helena M Ditzel
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; OPEN, Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Henrik J Ditzel
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Marianne Ewertz
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Trine Lembrecht Jørgensen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Per Pfeiffer
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Cecilia M Lund
- Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Gentofte, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; CopenAge, Copenhagen Center for Clinical Age research, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jesper Ryg
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Carrozzi A, Jin R, Monginot S, Puts M, Alibhai SMH. Defining an Abnormal Geriatric Assessment: Which Deficits Matter Most? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5776. [PMID: 38136321 PMCID: PMC10742229 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
At present, there is no clear definition of what constitutes an abnormal geriatric assessment (GA) in geriatric oncology. Various threshold numbers of abnormal GA domains are often used, but how well these are associated with treatment plan modification (TPM) and whether specific GA domains are more important in this context remains uncertain. A retrospective review of the geriatric oncology clinic database at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Canada, including new patients seen for treatment decision making from May 2015 to June 2022, was conducted. Logistic regression modelling was performed to determine the association between various predictor variables (including the GA domains and numerical thresholds) and TPM. The study cohort (n = 736) had a mean age of 80.7 years, 46.1% was female, and 78.3% had a VES-13 score indicating vulnerability (≥3). In the univariable analysis, the best-performing threshold number of abnormal domains based on area under the curve (AUC) was 4 (AUC 0.628). The best-performing multivariable model (AUC 0.704) included cognition, comorbidities, and falls risk. In comparison, the multivariable model with the sole addition of the threshold of 4 had an AUC of 0.689. Overall, an abnormal GA may be best defined as one with abnormalities in the domains of cognition, comorbidities, and falls risk. The optimal numerical threshold to predict TPM is 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Carrozzi
- Department of Medicine, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Rana Jin
- Department of Nursing, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Susie Monginot
- Department of Nursing, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Martine Puts
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P8, Canada
| | - Shabbir M. H. Alibhai
- Department of Medicine, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Loh KP, Mohile SG. Geriatric assessment and management: is decreasing treatment toxicity good enough? J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:1445-1447. [PMID: 37949100 PMCID: PMC11032707 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kah Poh Loh
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Supriya G Mohile
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Anwar MR, Yeretzian ST, Ayala AP, Matosyan E, Breunis H, Bote K, Puts M, Habib MH, Li Q, Sahakyan Y, Alibhai SMH, Abrahamyan L. Effectiveness of geriatric assessment and management in older cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:1483-1496. [PMID: 37738290 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frailty and multimorbidity among older cancer patients affect treatment tolerance and efficacy. Comprehensive geriatric assessment and management is recommended to optimize cancer treatment, but its effect on various outcomes remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cost-effectiveness studies comparing comprehensive geriatric assessment (with or without implementation of recommendations) to usual care in older cancer patients. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane trials from inception to January 27, 2023, for RCTs and cost-effectiveness studies. Pooled estimates for outcomes were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS A total of 19 full-text articles representing 17 RCTs were included. Average participant age was 72-80 years, and 31%-62% were female. Comprehensive geriatric assessment type, mode of delivery, and evaluated outcomes varied across studies. Meta-analysis revealed no difference in risk of mortality (risk ratio [RR] = 1.08. 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.91 to 1.29), hospitalization (RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.77 to 1.10), early treatment discontinuation (RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.67 to 1.19), initial dose reduction (RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.26), and subsequent dose reduction (RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.70 to 1.09). However, the risk of treatment toxicity was statistically significantly lower in the comprehensive geriatric assessment group (RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.86). No cost-effectiveness studies were identified. CONCLUSION Compared with usual care, comprehensive geriatric assessment was not associated with a difference in risk of mortality, hospitalization, treatment discontinuation, and dose reduction but was associated with a lower risk of treatment toxicity indicating its potential to optimize cancer treatment in this population. Further research is needed to evaluate cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Rashidul Anwar
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Ana Patricia Ayala
- Gerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Henriette Breunis
- Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kathyrin Bote
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Martine Puts
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Qixuan Li
- Biostatistics Research Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yeva Sahakyan
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shabbir M H Alibhai
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lusine Abrahamyan
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Seaman AT, Rowland JH, Werts SJ, Tam RM, Torres TK, Hucek FA, Wickersham KE, Fairman CM, Patel HD, Thomson CA, Hebert JR, Friedman DB. Examining provider perceptions and practices for comprehensive geriatric assessment among cancer survivors: a qualitative study with an implementation science focus. FRONTIERS IN AGING 2023; 4:1305922. [PMID: 38111517 PMCID: PMC10725930 DOI: 10.3389/fragi.2023.1305922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Cancer rates increase with age, and older cancer survivors have unique medical care needs, making assessment of health status and identification of appropriate supportive resources key to delivery of optimal cancer care. Comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGAs) help determine an older person's functional capabilities as cancer care providers plan treatment and follow-up care. Despite its proven utility, research on implementation of CGA is lacking. Methods: Guided by a qualitative description approach and through interviews with primary care providers and oncologists, our goal was to better understand barriers and facilitators of CGA use and identify training and support needs for implementation. Participants were identified through Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network partner listservs and a national cancer and aging organization. Potential interviewees, contacted via email, were provided with a description of the study purpose. Eight semi-structured interviews were conducted via Zoom, recorded, and transcribed verbatim by a professional transcription service. The interview guide explored providers' knowledge and use of CGAs. For codebook development, three representative transcripts were independently reviewed and coded by four team members. The interpretive process involved reflecting, transcribing, coding, and searching for and identifying themes. Results: Providers shared that, while it would be ideal to administer CGAs with all new patients, they were not always able to do this. Instead, they used brief screening tools or portions of CGAs, or both. There was variability in how CGA domains were assessed; however, all considered CGAs useful and they communicated with patients about their benefits. Identified facilitators of implementation included having clinic champions, an interdisciplinary care team to assist with implementation and referrals for intervention, and institutional resources and buy-in. Barriers noted included limited staff capacity and competing demands on time, provider inexperience, and misaligned institutional priorities. Discussion: Findings can guide solutions for improving the broader and more systematic use of CGAs in the care of older cancer patients. Uptake of processes like CGA to better identify those at risk of poor outcomes and intervening early to modify treatments are critical to maximize the health of the growing population of older cancer survivors living through and beyond their disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron T. Seaman
- Department of Internal Medicine - General Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Julia H. Rowland
- Smith Center for Healing and the Arts, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Samantha J. Werts
- Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Rowena M. Tam
- Physical Therapy Program, School of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Tara K. Torres
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, United States
- Department of Psychology, College of Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Freda Allyson Hucek
- Office for the Study of Aging, Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Karen E. Wickersham
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Ciaran M. Fairman
- Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Hiten D. Patel
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Cynthia A. Thomson
- Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - James R. Hebert
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Daniela B. Friedman
- Office for the Study of Aging, Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hormigo-Sanchez AI, Lopez-Garcia A, Mahillo-Fernandez I, Askari E, Morillo D, Perez-Saez MA, Riesco M, Urrutia C, Martinez-Peromingo FJ, Cordoba R, Gonzalez-Montalvo JI. Frailty assessment to individualize treatment in older patients with lymphoma. Eur Geriatr Med 2023; 14:1393-1402. [PMID: 37823983 PMCID: PMC10754742 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-023-00870-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A study analyzing the application of a protocol of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in older patients with lymphoma was carried out to allow frailty-based patient classification and individualized treatment. METHODS Lymphoma patients older than 70 years referred to the Geriatric Clinic at a tertiary hospital between May 2016 and March 2021 were included. The assessment protocol included comorbidity, polypharmacy, nutritional, functional, and mental status, geriatric syndromes, and life expectancy. CGA enabled patient classification into four groups (Type I to Type IV) based on frailty assessment instrument scoring and clinical, functional, and mental status. Variables were compared using parametric and non-parametric statistical tests and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS Ninety-three patients (55.9% women) were included. Median age was 81.1 years (± 5.7). 23 patients (24.7%) were classified as robust (type I), 30 (32.3%) as pre-frail (type II) with potentially reversable deficits, 38 (40.9%) as frail (type III), and 2 (2.2%) as requiring palliative care (type IV). Patients received oncospecific treatment with modifications carried out in 64.5% of cases based on CGA results. Differences in overall survival (p = 0.002), response to treatment (p < 0.001) and likelihood of increased frailty (p = 0.024) were observed, with type III-IV patients showing significantly worse outcomes. CONCLUSION Performance of standardized, systematic CGA by geriatricians permits older lymphoma patients to be classified according to frailty, with significant differences in terms of clinical outcomes across groups. We propose incorporating CGA performed by geriatricians as part of the multidisciplinary care team to optimize therapeutic strategy for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana I Hormigo-Sanchez
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Avenida Reyes Católicos, 2. CP 28040, Madrid, Spain.
- Health Research Institute IIS-FJD, Madrid, Spain.
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Autonoma University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Alberto Lopez-Garcia
- Department of Hematology, Fundación Jiménez, Diaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Oncohealth Institute, Fundación Jiménez Diaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Health Research Institute IIS-FJD, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Elham Askari
- Department of Hematology, Fundación Jiménez, Diaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Morillo
- Department of Hematology, Fundación Jiménez, Diaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - María A Perez-Saez
- Department of Hematology, Fundación Jiménez, Diaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miriam Riesco
- Oncohealth Institute, Fundación Jiménez Diaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Celia Urrutia
- Oncohealth Institute, Fundación Jiménez Diaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Raúl Cordoba
- Department of Hematology, Fundación Jiménez, Diaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Oncohealth Institute, Fundación Jiménez Diaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Health Research Institute IIS-FJD, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan I Gonzalez-Montalvo
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Autonoma University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Institute of La Paz University Hospital. IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Othman EH, AlOsta M, Abu-Snieneh HM, Zeilani R, Shamoun SA. The effect of burdensome symptoms and functional status on quality of life among older patients with cancer: A correlational study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2023; 67:102434. [PMID: 37879190 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The current study aimed to assess the effect of burdensome symptoms and functional status on QoL among Jordanian older patients with cancer presenting to outpatient clinics. METHODS A correlational design was implemented to collect data from 165 older patients with cancer visiting outpatient oncology clinics. RESULTS Generally, the participants have a relatively low quality of life (M = 52.22 ± 24.57). The highest needs according to their functional status were difficulty walking a long distance (M = 3.06 ± 1.004; physical functional status), feeling limited in pursuing hobbies or leisure time activities (M = 2.32 ± 1.05; role functional status), feeling nervous (M = 2.36 ± 1.01; emotional functional status), having difficulty concentrating (M = 2.15 ± 1.04; cognitive functional status), and that physical condition or medical treatment interfered with their social activities (M = 2.36 ± 1.10; social functional status). Further, the most common distressing symptom was insomnia (n = 90, 54%), followed by fatigue (n = 79, 47.9%). Lastly, quality of life improved with better functional status (the strongest correlation was with the role functional status: r = 0.503, p < .001) and declined with higher symptom severity (the strongest correlation was with fatigue: r = -0.566, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS To conclude, the current study sheds light on older patients with cancer burdensome symptoms and functional status and their effect on quality of life. The findings suggest that patients suffer from several functional limitations and distressing symptoms that affect their quality of life, necessitating screening and corrective actions from healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elham H Othman
- Faculty of Nursing, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan.
| | - Mohammad AlOsta
- Faculty of Nursing, The University of Jordan, Aqaba Campus, Aqaba, Jordan.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chew J, Chia JQ, Kyaw KK, Fu KJ, Lim C, Chua S, Tan HN. Frailty Screening and Detection of Geriatric Syndromes in Acute Inpatient Care: Impact on Hospital Length of Stay and 30-Day Readmissions. Ann Geriatr Med Res 2023; 27:315-323. [PMID: 37743682 PMCID: PMC10772326 DOI: 10.4235/agmr.23.0124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frailty is prevalent in acute care and is associated with negative outcomes. While a comprehensive geriatric assessment to identify geriatric syndromes is recommended after identifying frailty, more evidence is needed to support this approach in the inpatient setting. This study examined the association between frailty and geriatric syndromes and their impact on outcomes in acutely admitted older adults. METHODS A total of 733 individuals aged ≥65 years admitted to the General Surgery Service of a tertiary hospital were assessed for frailty using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and for geriatric syndromes using routine nursing admission assessments, including cognitive impairment, falls, incontinence, malnutrition, and poor oral health. Multinomial logistic regression and Cox regression were used to evaluate the associations between frailty and geriatric syndromes and their concomitant impact on hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmissions. RESULTS Greater frailty severity was associated with an increased likelihood of geriatric syndromes. Individuals categorized as CFS 4-6 and CFS 7-8 with concomitant geriatric syndromes had 29% and 35% increased risks of a longer LOS, respectively. CFS 4-6 was significantly associated with functional decline (relative risk ratio =1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-2.07) and 30-day readmission (hazare ratio=1.78; 95% CI, 1.04-3.04), whereas these associations were not significant for CFS 7-8. CONCLUSION Geriatric syndromes in frail individuals can be identified from routine nursing assessments and represent a potential approach for targeted interventions following frailty identification. Tailored interventions may be necessary to achieve optimal outcomes at different stages of frailty. Further research is required to evaluate interventions for older adults with frailty in a wider hospital context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Chew
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
- Institute of Geriatrics and Active Ageing, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jia Qian Chia
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
- Institute of Geriatrics and Active Ageing, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Kay Khine Kyaw
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Katrielle Joy Fu
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Celestine Lim
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Shiyun Chua
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Huei Nuo Tan
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Brenner DR, Carbonell C, O’Sullivan DE, Ruan Y, Basmadjian RB, Bu V, Farah E, Loewen SK, Bond TR, Estey A, Pujadas Botey A, Robson PJ. Exploring the Future of Cancer Impact in Alberta: Projections and Trends 2020-2040. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:9981-9995. [PMID: 37999145 PMCID: PMC10670527 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30110725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The impact of cancer in Alberta is expected to grow considerably, largely driven by population growth and aging. The Future of Cancer Impact (FOCI) initiative offers an overview of the present state of cancer care in Alberta and highlights potential opportunities for research and innovation across the continuum. In this paper, we present a series of detailed projections and analyses regarding cancer epidemiological estimates in Alberta, Canada. Data on cancer incidence and mortality in Alberta (1998-2018) and limited-duration cancer prevalence in Alberta (2000-2019) were collected from the Alberta Cancer Registry. We used the Canproj package in the R software to project these epidemiological estimates up to the year 2040. To estimate the direct management costs, we ran a series of microsimulations using the OncoSim All Cancers Model. Our findings indicate that from 2020, the total number of annual new cancer cases and cancer-related deaths are projected to increase by 56% and 49% by 2040, respectively. From 2019, the five-year prevalence of all cancers in Alberta is projected to increase by 86% by 2040. In line with these trends, the overall direct cost of cancer management is estimated to increase by 53% in 2040. These estimates and projections are integral to future strategic planning and investment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren R. Brenner
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | | | | | - Yibing Ruan
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | | | - Vickey Bu
- Cancer Research & Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB T5J 3H1, Canada
| | - Eliya Farah
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Shaun K. Loewen
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Calgary, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
| | - Tara R. Bond
- Cancer Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada
| | - Angela Estey
- Cancer Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada
| | - Anna Pujadas Botey
- Cancer Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Paula J. Robson
- Cancer Research & Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB T5J 3H1, Canada
- Cancer Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ketelaers SHJ, Jacobs A, van der Linden CMJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Tolenaar JL, Rutten HJT, Burger JWA, Bloemen JG. An evaluation of postoperative outcomes and treatment changes after frailty screening and geriatric assessment and management in a cohort of older patients with colorectal cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101647. [PMID: 37862736 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Revised: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adequate patient selection is crucial within the treatment of older patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). While previous studies report increased morbidity and mortality in older patients screened positive for frailty, improvements in the perioperative care and postoperative outcomes have raised the question of whether older patients screened positive for frailty still face worse outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the postoperative outcomes of older patients with CRC screened positive for frailty, and to evaluate changes in treatment after frailty screening and geriatric assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients ≥70 years with primary CRC who underwent frailty screening between 1 January 2019 and 31 October 2021 were included. Frailty screening was performed by the Geriatric-8 (G8) screening tool. If the G8 indicated frailty (G8 ≤ 14), patients were referred for a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Postoperative outcomes and changes in treatment based on frailty screening and CGA were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 170 patients were included, of whom 74 (43.5%) screened positive for frailty (G8 ≤ 14). Based on the CGA, the initially proposed treatment plan was altered to a less intensive regimen in five (8.9%) patients, and to a more intensive regimen in one (1.8%) patient. Surgery was performed in 87.8% of patients with G8 ≤ 14 and 96.9% of patients with G8 > 14 (p = 0.03). Overall postoperative complications were similar between patients with G8 ≤ 14 and G8 > 14 (46.2% vs. 47.3%, p = 0.89). Postoperative delirium was observed in 7.7% of patients with G8 ≤ 14 and 1.1% of patients with G8 > 14 (p = 0.08). No differences in 30-day mortality (1.1% vs. 1.5%, p > 0.99) or one-year and two-year survival rates were observed (log rank, p = 0.26). DISCUSSION Although patients screened positive for frailty underwent CRC surgery less often, those considered eligible for surgery can safely undergo CRC resection within current clinical care pathways, without increased morbidity and mortality. Efforts to optimise perioperative care and minimise the risk of postoperative complications, in particular delirium, seem warranted. A multidisciplinary onco-geriatric pathway may support tailored decision-making in patients at risk of frailty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stijn H J Ketelaers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
| | - Anne Jacobs
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Carolien M J van der Linden
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jip L Tolenaar
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Harm J T Rutten
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Department of GROW, School for Oncology & Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Jacobus W A Burger
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Johanne G Bloemen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Disalvo D, Moth E, Soo WK, Garcia MV, Blinman P, Steer C, Amgarth-Duff I, Power J, Phillips J, Agar M. The effect of comprehensive geriatric assessment on care received, treatment completion, toxicity, cancer-related and geriatric assessment outcomes, and quality of life for older adults receiving systemic anti-cancer treatment: A systematic review. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101585. [PMID: 37573197 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This systematic review aims to summarise the available literature on the effect of geriatric assessment (multidimensional health assessment across medical, social, and functional domains; "GA") or comprehensive geriatric assessment (geriatric assessment with intervention or management recommendations; "CGA") compared to usual care for older adults with cancer on care received, treatment completion, adverse treatment effects, survival and health-related quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PubMed was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials or prospective cohort comparison studies on the effect of GA/CGA on care received, treatment, and cancer outcomes for older adults with cancer. RESULTS Ten studies were included: seven randomised controlled trials (RCTs), two phase II randomised pilot studies, and one prospective cohort comparison study. All studies included older adults receiving systemic therapy, mostly chemotherapy, for mixed cancer types (eight studies), colorectal cancer (one study), and non-small cell lung cancer (one study). Integrating GA/CGA into oncological care increased treatment completion (three of nine studies), reduced grade 3+ chemotherapy toxicity (two of five studies), and improved quality of life scores (four of five studies). No studies found significant differences in survival between GA/CGA and usual care. GA/CGA incorporated into care decisions prompted less intensive treatment and greater non-oncological interventions, including supportive care strategies. DISCUSSION GA/CGA integrated into the care of an older adult with cancer has the potential to optimise care decisions, which may lead to reduced treatment toxicity, increased treatment completion, and improved health-related quality of life scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenica Disalvo
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care, through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Erin Moth
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Sydney NSW, Australia
| | - Wee Kheng Soo
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Victoria, Australia; Department of Aged Medicine, Eastern Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maja V Garcia
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care, through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Prunella Blinman
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Ingrid Amgarth-Duff
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care, through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jack Power
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care, through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane Phillips
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Meera Agar
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care, through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
García-Baztán A, Viguria-Alegria MC, Ramón-Espinoza MF, Tamayo-Rodríguez I, Gonzales-Montejo NJ, Martínez-Velilla N, Oteiza-Olaso J. Hand grip strength, short physical performance battery, and gait speed: key tools for function in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Ann Hematol 2023; 102:2823-2834. [PMID: 37566279 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05397-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to determine which performance assessment tools included in Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) are the most sensitive for the functional approach in the initial evaluation and during the therapy of old adults diagnosed with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). We prospectively recruited 31 patients aged 70 years or older presenting for an initial consultation in the Hematology Clinic of a tertiary hospital. We implemented an updated physical performance evaluation as part of CGA at baseline and during treatment. Baseline characteristics of the sample were compared according to age, Geriatric 8 (G8), frailty, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and sarcopenia measured by hand grip strength (HGS). Functional changes were monitored during the treatment period using HGS, gait speed (GS) and SPPB. The mean age was 79.0 (5.5) years and 51.6% of the sample was frail; 65,5% were treated with standard chemotherapy and 35,5% with a therapeutic regimen with attenuated doses. All the assessment tools included in CGA found functional differences at baseline when the sample was stratified and compared according to frailty, sarcopenia, and SPPB, but not according to G8 score and age. Only SPPB was able to detect functional differences between groups stratified by age at baseline. GS was the only score that identified clinically significant functional changes during the treatment. In conclusion, HGS and SPPB are appropriate performance scores to complete the functional approach in the initial hematologic evaluation, and GS is a promising option to detect functional decline during therapy in old adults with DLBCL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mari Cruz Viguria-Alegria
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Ibai Tamayo-Rodríguez
- Division of Methodology, Biomedical Research Centre of the Government of Navarra (Navarrabiomed), Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios Y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Red de Investigación en Cronicidad, Atención Primaria Y Promoción de La Salud (RICAPPS), Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Nicolás Martínez-Velilla
- Department of Geriatrics, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Biomedical Research Centre of the Government of Navarra (Navarrabiomed), Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Julio Oteiza-Olaso
- Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Dale W, Klepin HD, Williams GR, Alibhai SMH, Bergerot C, Brintzenhofeszoc K, Hopkins JO, Jhawer MP, Katheria V, Loh KP, Lowenstein LM, McKoy JM, Noronha V, Phillips T, Rosko AE, Ruegg T, Schiaffino MK, Simmons JF, Subbiah I, Tew WP, Webb TL, Whitehead M, Somerfield MR, Mohile SG. Practical Assessment and Management of Vulnerabilities in Older Patients Receiving Systemic Cancer Therapy: ASCO Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4293-4312. [PMID: 37459573 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 91.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To update the ASCO guideline (2018) on the practical assessment and management of age-associated vulnerabilities in older patients undergoing systemic cancer therapy. METHODS An Expert Panel conducted a systematic review to identify relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and meta-analyses from January 2016 to December 2022. RESULTS A total of 26 publications met eligibility criteria and form the evidentiary basis for the update. RECOMMENDATIONS The Expert Panel reiterates its overarching recommendation from the prior guideline that geriatric assessment (GA), including all essential domains, should be used to identify vulnerabilities or impairments that are not routinely captured in oncology assessments for all patients over 65 years old with cancer. Based on recently published RCTs demonstrating significantly improved clinical outcomes, all older adults with cancer (65+ years old) receiving systemic therapy with GA-identified deficits should have GA-guided management (GAM) included in their care plan. GAM includes using GA findings to inform cancer treatment decision-making as well as to address impairments through appropriate interventions, counseling, and/or referrals. A GA should include high priority aging-related domains known to be associated with outcomes in older adults with cancer: physical and cognitive function, emotional health, comorbid conditions, polypharmacy, nutrition, and social support. Clinical adaptation of the GA based on patient population, resources, and time is appropriate.The Panel recommends the Practical Geriatric Assessment as one option for this purpose (https://old-prod.asco.org/sites/new-www.asco.org/files/content-files/practice-patients/documents/2023-PGA-Final.pdf; https://youtu.be/jnaQIjOz2Dw; https://youtu.be/nZXtwaGh0Z0).Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Dale
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Heidi D Klepin
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Vani Katheria
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | | | - June M McKoy
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Tanyanika Phillips
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Ashley E Rosko
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Tracy Ruegg
- WellStar School of Nursing, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA
| | | | | | | | - William P Tew
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Tracy L Webb
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston Salem, NC
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rostoft S, Seghers N, Hamaker ME. Achieving harmony in oncological geriatric assessment - Should we agree on a best set of tools? J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101473. [PMID: 36935281 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Siri Rostoft
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Nelleke Seghers
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marije E Hamaker
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Puts M, Waked JAA, Strohschein F, Breunis H, Alqurini N, Berger A, Romanovsky L, Monette J, Mehta R, Li A, Wan-Chow-Wah D, Koneru R, Szumacher E, Mariano C, Hsu T, Brennenstuhl S, Amir E, Krzyzanowska MK, Jang R, Pitters E, Emmenegger U, Menjak IB, Bergman S, Lemonde M, Beland F, Alibhai SMH. Implementing geriatric assessment and management for older Canadians with cancer: Adherence to and satisfaction with the intervention, results of the 5C study. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101586. [PMID: 37459767 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Geriatric assessment and management (GAM) is recommended by professional organizations and recently several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated benefits in multiple health outcomes. GAM typically leads to one or more recommendations for the older adult on how to optimize their health. However, little is known about how well recommendations are adhered to. Understanding these issues is vital to designing GAM trials and clinical programs. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the number of GAM recommendations made and adherence to and satisfaction with the intervention in a multicentre RCT of GAM for older adults with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS The 5C study was a two-group parallel RCT conducted in eight hospitals across Canada. Each centre kept a detailed recruitment and retention log. The intervention teams documented adherence to their recommendations. Medical records were also reviewed to assess which recommendations were adhered to. Twenty-three semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 members of the intervention teams and 11 oncology team members to assess implementation of the study and the intervention. RESULTS Of the 350 participants who were enrolled, 173 were randomized to the intervention arm. Median number of recommendations was seven. Mean adherence to recommendations based on the GAM was 69%, but it varied by type of recommendation, ranging from 98% for laboratory tests to 28% for psychosocial/psychiatry oncology referrals. There was no difference in the number of recommendations or non-adherence to recommendations by sex, level of frailty, or functional status. Oncologists and intervention team members were satisfied with the study implementation and intervention delivery. DISCUSSION Adherence to recommendations was variable. Adherence to laboratory investigations and further imaging were generally high but much lower for recommendations regarding psychosocial support. Further collaborative work with older adults with cancer is needed to understand how to optimize the intervention to be consistent with patient goals, priorities, and values to ensure maximal impact on health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martine Puts
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Jihad Abou Ali Waked
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fay Strohschein
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Henriette Breunis
- Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Naser Alqurini
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Amiri Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Arielle Berger
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Health Network, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lindy Romanovsky
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Health Network, Ontario, Canada
| | - Johanne Monette
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Rajin Mehta
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anson Li
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Doreen Wan-Chow-Wah
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Rama Koneru
- Department of Medical Oncology, R.S. McLaughlin Durham Regional Cancer Centre, Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ewa Szumacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Caroline Mariano
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Tina Hsu
- Division of Medical Oncology, the Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Brennenstuhl
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eitan Amir
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monika K Krzyzanowska
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Raymond Jang
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Pitters
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Urban Emmenegger
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ines B Menjak
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Simon Bergman
- Department of Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Manon Lemonde
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Francois Beland
- Public Health School, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Shabbir M H Alibhai
- Department of Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Seghers PALN, Rostoft S, O'Hanlon S, O'Sullivan B, Portielje JEA, Wildiers H, Soubeyran P, Hamaker ME. Challenges of caring for older patients with multimorbidity including cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101588. [PMID: 37454533 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As the population is ageing, the number of older patients with multimorbidity including cancer continues to increase. To improve care for these patients, the European Union-funded project "Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological evaluation based on IC Technology" (GERONTE) was initiated to develop a new, patient-centred, holistic care pathway. The aim of this paper is to analyse what challenges are encountered in everyday clinical practice according to patients, their informal caregivers, and healthcare professionals as a starting point for the development of the care pathway. MATERIALS AND METHODS An expert panel of cancer and geriatrics specialists participated in an online survey to answer what challenges they experience in caring for older patients with multimorbidity including cancer and what treatment outcomes could be improved. Furthermore, in-depth interviews with older patients and their informal caregivers were organised to assess what challenges they experience. RESULTS Healthcare professionals (n = 36) most frequently mentioned the challenge of choosing the best treatment in light of the lack of evidence in this population and how to handle interactions between the (cancer) treatment and multimorbidities. Twelve patients and caregivers participated, and they most frequently mentioned challenges related to treatment outcomes, such as how to deal with symptoms of disease or treatment and how to maintain quality of life. From the challenges, five main themes emerged that should be taken into account when developing a new care pathway for older patients with multimorbidity including cancer. Two themes focus on decision making aspects such as personalized treatment recommendations and inclusion of non-oncologic information, two focus on patient support and monitoring to maintain quality of life and functioning, and one overarching theme addresses care coordination to prevent fragmentation of care. DISCUSSION In conclusion, the management of older patients with multimorbidity including cancer is complex and although progress has been made on improving aspects of their care, challenges remain and patients are at risk of receiving inappropriate, unnecessary, and potentially harmful treatment. A patient-centred care pathway that integrates solutions to the five main themes and that moves away from a single-disease centred approach is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A L Nelleke Seghers
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht 3582 KE, the Netherlands.
| | - Siri Rostoft
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo 0424, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo 0318, Norway.
| | - Shane O'Hanlon
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin D04 T6F4, Ireland; Department of Geriatric Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin D04 V1W8, Ireland.
| | - Bridget O'Sullivan
- School of Nursing, Psychotherpay, & Community Health, Dublin City Univeristy, Ireland.
| | - Johanneke E A Portielje
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center-LUMC,Leiden 2333 ZA, the Netherlands.
| | - Hans Wildiers
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Pierre Soubeyran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Inserm U1312, SIRIC BRIO, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux 33076, France.
| | - Marije E Hamaker
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht 3582 KE, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Seghers PAL, Alibhai SMH, Battisti NML, Kanesvaran R, Extermann M, O'Donovan A, Pilleron S, Mislang AR, Musolino N, Cheung KL, Staines A, Girvalaki C, Soubeyran P, Portielje JEA, Rostoft S, Hamaker ME, Trépel D, O'Hanlon S. Geriatric assessment for older people with cancer: policy recommendations. Glob Health Res Policy 2023; 8:37. [PMID: 37653521 PMCID: PMC10472678 DOI: 10.1186/s41256-023-00323-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Most cancers occur in older people and the burden in this age group is increasing. Over the past two decades the evidence on how best to treat this population has increased rapidly. However, implementation of new best practices has been slow and needs involvement of policymakers. This perspective paper explains why older people with cancer have different needs than the wider population. An overview is given of the recommended approach for older people with cancer and its benefits on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. In older patients, the geriatric assessment (GA) is the gold standard to measure level of fitness and to determine treatment tolerability. The GA, with multiple domains of physical health, functional status, psychological health and socio-environmental factors, prevents initiation of inappropriate oncologic treatment and recommends geriatric interventions to optimize the patient's general health and thus resilience for receiving treatments. Multiple studies have proven its benefits such as reduced toxicity, better quality of life, better patient-centred communication and lower healthcare use. Although GA might require investment of time and resources, this is relatively small compared to the improved outcomes, possible cost-savings and compared to the large cost of oncologic treatments as a whole.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A L Seghers
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, 3582 KE, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Shabbir M H Alibhai
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti
- Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, London, SM2 5PT, UK
- Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | | | - Martine Extermann
- Department of Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Anita O'Donovan
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity (ARTT), School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sophie Pilleron
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Anna Rachelle Mislang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Najia Musolino
- International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG), International Environmental House 2, Chemin de Balexert 7-9, 1219, Chatelaine, Switzerland
| | | | - Anthony Staines
- School of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Charis Girvalaki
- European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pierre Soubeyran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Inserm U1312, SIRIC BRIO, Université de Bordeaux, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - Johanneke E A Portielje
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center-LUMC, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Siri Rostoft
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0424, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marije E Hamaker
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, 3582 KE, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Dominic Trépel
- Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity Institute of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Shane O'Hanlon
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, D04 T6F4, Ireland.
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Introducing the new point-counterpoint series. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101562. [PMID: 37385937 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
|
48
|
Guedes H, Marinho J, Neto E, Custódio S, Costa A, Veríssimo R. Geriatric Assessment of Older Adults With Cancer During Acute Hospitalizations: Challenges and Opportunities. Cureus 2023; 15:e44940. [PMID: 37818491 PMCID: PMC10561347 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Geriatrics is a discipline that covers all adult healthcare, and oncology is no exception. The global geriatric assessment process plays a crucial role, impacting research, funding, resource allocation, as well as therapeutic decision-making. Thus, greater knowledge of the epidemiology of the frailty and functionality of elderly patients with cancer will allow for the development of a global care strategy. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of geriatric conditions in elderly cancer patients admitted to a medical geriatric unit following unplanned hospitalisation. Methods A retrospective, single-centre cohort study was conducted of patients aged ≥ 75 with an active oncological disease who were admitted to a geriatric medicine unit over a two-year period. Results A total of 65 patients were included. The median age was 85 (IQR 81-88), and 86% were aged ≥ 80. A moderate-to-high functional dependence was found: 67.7% on ≥ 3 basic activities of daily living (Katz ≥ D), with the majority classified as severely dependent based on the Barthel Index (mean 49.0 ± 33.7). Frailty was found in 90.7%. A high prevalence of geriatric syndromes was observed: malnutrition (84.6%), polypharmacy (64.6%), urinary incontinence (58.5%) and pressure ulcers (33.8%). The mortality rate was 36.9% during hospitalisation and 13.8%, 30 days post-discharge. Conclusions The study revealed a high prevalence of geriatric conditions, emphasising the importance of comprehensive assessment in managing elderly patients at different stages of the disease. This multidimensional and multidisciplinary approach optimises patient care throughout admission, hospitalisation and discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Guedes
- Oncology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, PRT
| | - Joana Marinho
- Oncology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, PRT
| | - Ema Neto
- Oncology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, PRT
| | - Sandra Custódio
- Oncology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, PRT
| | - António Costa
- Internal Medicine / Geriatrics, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, PRT
| | - Rafaela Veríssimo
- Internal Medicina / Geriatrics, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, PRT
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Soubeyran P, Bellera C, Paillaud E. Achieving harmony in oncological geriatric assessment - Should we agree on a best set of tools? J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101482. [PMID: 37019752 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Soubeyran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bergonie Institute, Comprehensive Cancer Center, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; Univ. Bordeaux, SIRIC BRIO, Inserm, UMR 1312, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
| | - Carine Bellera
- Univ. Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Epicene team, UMR 1219, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; Inserm CIC1401, Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Center, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Elena Paillaud
- Department of Geriatrics, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), F-75015 Paris, France; IMRB, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Université Paris-Est Créteil, F-94010 Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Williams GR, Hopkins JO, Klepin HD, Lowenstein LM, Mackenzie A, Mohile SG, Somerfield MR, Dale W. Practical Assessment and Management of Vulnerabilities in Older Patients Receiving Systemic Cancer Therapy: ASCO Guideline Questions and Answers. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:718-723. [PMID: 37459585 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Heidi D Klepin
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | - Amy Mackenzie
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - William Dale
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| |
Collapse
|