[Cervical ripening with balloon catheter for scared uterus: a three-year retrospective study]

Predictors of vaginal delivery following balloon catheter for labor induction in women with one previous cesarean

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to estimate predictors for vaginal birth following balloon catheter induction of labor (IOL) in women with one previous cesarean section (CS) and an unfavorable cervix.

METHODS

This 4-year retrospective cohort study was conducted in Longhua District Central Hospital in Shenzhen China, between January 2015 and December 2018. Patients with one previous CS and a current singleton-term pregnancy who underwent balloon catheter cervical ripening and IOL were enrolled. Univariate analysis was used to identify predictive factors associated with vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC). Binary logistic regression was further used to identify which factors were independently associated with the outcome measure. The primary outcome was VBAC, which was a successful trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) following IOL.

RESULTS

A total of 69.57% (208/299) of the women who planned for IOL had VBAC. In the final binary logistic regression equation, lower fetal weight (< 4000 g) (odds ratio [OR]5.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.09,13.27), lower body mass index (BMI,<30 kg/m²) (OR 2.27; CI 1.21, 4.26), Bishop score after cervical ripening > 6 (OR 1.94; CI 1.37, 2.76) remained independently associated with an increased chance of VBAC.

CONCLUSIONS

The influencing factors of VBAC following IOL were fetal weight, BMI, and Bishop score after cervical ripening. Adequate individualized management and assessment of the IOL may help improve the VBAC rate.

Robson's Ten Group Classification System to Evaluate Cesarean Section Rates in Honduras: The Relevance of Labor Induction

OBJECTIVE

 To use the Robson Ten Group Classification (RTGC) to analyze cesarean section (CS) rates in a Honduran maternity hospital, with focus in groups that consider induction of labor.

METHODS

 Cross-sectional study. Women admitted for childbirth (August 2017 to October 2018) were classified according to the RTGC. The CS rate for each group and the contribution to the overall CS rate was calculated, with further analyses of the induction of labor among term primiparous (group 2a), term multiparous (group 4a), and cases with one previous CS (group 5.1).

RESULTS

 A total of 4,356 women were considered, with an overall CS rate of 26.1%. Group 3 was the largest group, with 38.6% (1,682/4,356) of the cases, followed by Group 1, with 30.8% (1,342/4,356), and Group 5, with 10.3% (450/4,356). Considering the contribution to overall CS rates per group, Group 5 contributed with 30.4% (345/1,136) of the CSs and within this group, 286/345 (82.9%) had 1 previous CS, with a CS rate > 70%. Groups 1 and 3, with 26.6% (291/1,136) and 13.5% (153/1,136), respectively, were the second and third larger contributors to the CS rate. Groups 2a and 4a had high induction success, with low CS rates (18.4 and 16.9%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

 The RTGC is a useful tool to assess CS rates in different healthcare facilities. Groups 5, 1, and 3 were the main contributors to the CS rate, and groups 2 and 4 showed the impact and importance of induction of labor. These findings may support future interventions to reduce unnecessary CS, especially among primiparous and in women with previous CS.

Predictive factors for successful cervical ripening using a double-balloon catheter after previous cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE

To identify predictors of successful cervical ripening using double-balloon catheter (DBC) for labor induction among women with previous cesarean delivery (PCD) and unfavorable cervix at term.

METHODS

The present prospective observational study was conducted among women who underwent cervical ripening with DBC at a French tertiary care hospital between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2017. Inclusion criteria were PCD; singleton term fetus; cephalic presentation; and unfavorable cervix (Bishop score <6). Indications for DBC were gestational diabetes mellitus, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, pre-eclampsia, prolonged pregnancy, fetal growth restriction, or prenatal suspicion of macrosomia. The primary outcome was Bishop score of at least six after DBC removal.

RESULTS

Among the 105 patients included, the initial Bishop score was 2.5 ± 1.5; successful cervical ripening occurred among 74 (70.5%) women; and vaginal delivery occurred among 46 (43.8%). The mean time from DBC insertion to delivery was 19.3 ± 6.7 hours. No adverse events were observed. Predictors of successful cervical ripening were initial Bishop score of at least three (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 12.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.78-58.47); PCD during labor (aOR 4.38, 95% CI 1.10-17.45); and internal cervical os open (aOR 4.94, 95% CI 1.44-17.01).

CONCLUSION

Several factors were found to predict successful cervical ripening using DBC.

Double-balloon catheter for induction of labour in women with a previous cesarean section, could it be the best choice?

Introduction

We analysed the efficacy and safety of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening in women with a previous cesarean section and which were the most important variables associated with an increased risk of repeated cesarean delivery.

Materials and methods

We designed an observational retrospective study of 418 women with unfavourable cervices (Bishop Score <5), a prior cesarean delivery, and induction of labour with a double-balloon catheter. Baseline maternal data and perinatal outcomes were recorded for a descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate analysis. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Most women improved their initial Bishop Score (89.5%) although only a 20.8% of them went into spontaneous active labour. Finally, 51.4% of the women achieved a vaginal delivery. Five cases of intrapartum uterine rupture (1.2%) occurred. After multivariate analysis, main risk factors for repeated cesarean section were dystocia in the previous pregnancy (OR 1.744; CI 95% 1.066–2.846), the absence of previous vaginal delivery (OR 2.590; CI 95% 1.066–6.290), suspected fetal macrosomia (OR 2.410; CI 95% 0.959–6.054), and duration of oxytocin induction period (OR 1.005; CI 95% 1.004–1.006). The area under the curve was 0.789 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Double-balloon catheter seems to be safe and effective for cervical ripening in women with a previous cesarean delivery and unfavourable cervix. In our study, most women could have a vaginal delivery in spite of their risk factors for cesarean delivery. A multivariate model based on some clinical variables has moderate predictive value for intrapartum cesarean section.

A randomised controlled trial comparing 30 mL and 80 mL in Foley catheter for induction of labour after previous Caesarean section

Inducing labour with a Foley balloon catheter rather than using oxytocin or prostaglandins is considered to be less risky if the uterus is scarred.¹ It is not known if more fluid in the balloon is more effective without being more dangerous. Volumes of 80 mL and 30 mL were compared in 154 eligible women. Mode of delivery, duration of labour and delivery within 24 h were similar in both groups. However, the second group required oxytocin more frequently. Though more scar dehiscences occurred in the first group, the difference was not significant.

Double-balloon catheter and sequential vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 alone for induction of labor after previous cesarean section

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of inducing labor using a double-balloon catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) sequentially, in comparison with vaginal PGE2 alone after previous cesarean section.

METHODS

A total of 264 pregnant women with previous cesarean section undergoing labor induction at term were included in this prospective multicentre cohort study. Induction of labor was performed either by vaginal PGE2 gel or double-balloon catheter followed by vaginal PGE2. The primary outcome measure was the cesarean section rate.

RESULTS

The cesarean section rate was 37 % without any statistically significant difference between the two groups (PGE2: n = 41, 37 % vs. balloon catheter/PGE2: n = 41, 42 %; P = 0.438). The median (range) number of applications of PGE2 [2 (1-10) versus 1 (0-8), P < 0.001] and the total amount of PGE2 used in median (range) mg [2 (1-15) vs. 1 (0-14), P = 0.001] was less in the balloon catheter/PGE2 group. Factors significantly increasing risk for cesarean section were "no previous vaginal delivery" (OR 5.391; CI 2.671-10.882) and "no oxytocin augmentation during childbirth" (OR 2.119; CI 1.215-3.695).

CONCLUSIONS

The sequential application of double-balloon catheter and vaginal PGE2 is as effective as the sole use of vaginal PGE2 with less applications and total amount of PGE2.

[Double-balloon device and intravaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in women with unfavourable cervix]

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficiency of a double cervical ripening (mechanical agent and dinoprostone) to a dinoprostone-only ripening in women with an unfavourable cervix.

METHODS

In a retrospective study from January 2008 to October 2013, 96 patients were included with the following criteria: pregnancies over 37 weeks, singleton, vertex presentation, medical indication for induction of labor, no premature rupture of membranes and very unfavourable cervix (Bishop score ≤ 3). Patients were classified into 2 groups: intravaginal dinoprostone for 24h (prostaglandin group, n=38) and double-balloon device for 12h followed by intravaginal dinoprostone for 24h (balloon+prostaglandin group, n=58).

RESULTS

There was no difference in vaginal delivery rates between the 2 groups (balloon+prostaglandin group 51.7%, prostaglandin group 50%, P=0.87). The Bishop score after cervical ripening was significantly higher in the balloon+prostaglandin group (4.4 versus 2.4, P<0.0001), but the interval between the induction and the delivery was longer (33.6h versus 24.9h, P=0.0044). There was no significant difference for maternal and neonatal complications.

CONCLUSION

A double cervical ripening (with mechanical agent and dinoprostone) allows the Bishop score to be improved without increasing the rate of vaginal delivery, for patients with a Bishop score ≤ 3.