Chlorhexidine dressings could reduce external ventricular drain infections: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis

Effectiveness of a multimodal strategy to reduce external ventricular drain-associated infection: A quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND

Infection is a serious complication in neurosurgical patients who undergo external ventricular drain (EVD) insertion.

METHODS

We conducted a quasi-experimental study in patients who underwent EVD insertion to evaluate the impact of a multi-modal strategy to reduce the incidence of external ventricular drain associated infections (EVDAIs). The study was divided into 2 periods; (1) the pre-intervention period when techniques for EVD insertion and maintenance were up to the discretion of the neurosurgeons and (2) the post-intervention after implementation of a multi-modal strategy (cefazolin antibiotic prophylaxis, preoperative chlorhexidine showers, application of postoperative chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing, limited manipulation of the EVD, and meticulous EVD management). The primary outcome was the incidence rate of EVDAIs; secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality rate, the hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

In total, 135 patients were included. The incidence rate of EVDAIs was significantly reduced in the post-intervention period (5.6 cases/1,000 EVD-days) compared with the pre-intervention period (18.2 cases/1,000 EVD-days; P=0.026). There were no differences in all secondary outcomes analyzed. This multi-modal strategy was associated with high satisfaction among health care personnel.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a multi-modal strategy was associated with a reduction in the incidence of EVDAIs. This was in line with our goal of promoting a new culture of safety despite being in a resource-limited setting.

Management of external ventricular drain: to wean or not to wean?

PURPOSE

External ventricular drain (EVD) is one of the most frequent procedures in neurosurgery and around 15 to 30% of these patients require a permanent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion. The optimal EVD weaning strategy is still unclear. Whether gradual weaning compared to rapid closure, reduces the rate of permanent CSF diversion remains controversial. The aim of this trial is to compare the rates of permanent CSF diversion between gradual weaning and rapid closure of an EVD.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study including patients between 2010 to 2020. Patients were divided into a weaning (WG) and non-weaning (NWG) group. The primary outcome was permanent CSF diversion rates, secondary outcomes included hospitalization time, EVD-related morbidity, and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Out of 412 patients, 123 (29.9%) patients were excluded due to early death or palliative treatment. We registered 178 (61.6%) patients in the WG and 111 (38.4%) in the NWG. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The VPS rate was comparable in both groups (NWG 37.8%; WG 39.9%, p = 0.728). EVD related infection (13.5% vs 1.8%, p < 0.001), as well as non-EVD related infection rates (2.8% vs 0%, p < 0.001), were significantly higher in the WG. Hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the NWG (WG 24.93 ± 9.50 days; NWG 23.66 ± 14.51 days, p = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Gradual EVD weaning does not seem to reduce the need for permanent CSF diversion, while infection rates and hospitalization time were significantly higher/longer. Therefore, direct closure should be considered in the clinical setting.

Single institution series describing external ventricular drain (EVD) placement and short- and long-term complications related to placement accuracy

Background

The placement of an external ventricular drain (EVD) for the treatment of acute hydrocephalus is one of the most common life-saving procedures that neurosurgeons perform worldwide. There are many well-known complications associated with EVD placement, including tract hemorrhages, intra-parenchymal and subdural hemorrhages, infection, and catheter misplacement. Given the variety of complications associated with EVD placement and the inconsistent findings on the relationship of accuracy to complications, the present study reviewed short- and long-term complications related to EVD placement at our institution.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted for all consecutive patients who underwent bedside EVD placement for any indication between December 2020 and December 2021. Collected variables included demographic information, etiology of disease state, pre-and post-operative head computed tomography measurements, and post-procedural metrics (immediate and delayed complications).

Results

A total of 124 patients qualified for inclusion in our study. EVDs that were non-functioning/exchanged were not significantly related to age, accuracy, ventriculomegaly, sex, disposition, laterality, type of EVD used, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), etiology, or Kakarla Grade (KG) (all P > 0.17). The need for a second EVD was similarly not related to age, accuracy, ventriculomegaly, sex, disposition, location, laterality, type of EVD used, IVH, etiology, or KG (all P > 0.130). Patients who died, however, were significantly more likely to have a second contralateral EVD placed (18.2% vs. 4.9% P = 0.029). We also found that left-sided EVDs were significantly more likely to fail within seven days of placement (29.4% vs 13.3%, P = 0.037; relative risk (RR) 1.93, 95% confidence interval: 1.09-3.43), unrelated to age, sex, etiology, type of EVD, IVH, location of the procedure, or accuracy (all P > 0.07). This remained significant when using a binary logistic regression to control for ventriculomegaly, accuracy, mortality, age, sex, and etiology (P = 0.021, B = 3.43).

Conclusion

In our cohort, although a clear relationship between inaccuracy and complication rates was not found, our data did demonstrate that left-sided EVDs were more likely to fail within the immediate postoperative time point, and patients who died were more likely to have a second, contralateral EVD placed.

Prevention of device-related infections in patients with cancer: Current practice and future horizons

Over the past several years, multifaceted advances in the management of cancer have led to a significant improvement in survival rates. Throughout patients' oncological journeys, they will likely receive one or more implantable devices for the administration of fluids and medications as well as management of various comorbidities and complications related to cancer therapy. Infections associated with these devices are frequent and complex, often necessitating device removal, increasing health care costs, negatively affecting quality of life, and complicating oncological care, usually leading to delays in further life-saving cancer therapy. Herein, the authors comprehensively review multiple evidence-based recommendations along with best practices, expert opinions, and novel approaches for the prevention of diverse device-related infections. The authors present many general principles for the prevention of these infections followed by specific device-related recommendations in a systematic manner. The continuous involvement and meaningful cooperation between regulatory entities, industry, specialty medical societies, hospitals, and infection control-targeted interventions, along with primary care and consulting health care providers, are all vital for the sustained reduction in the incidence of these preventable infections.

Predictors of ventriculostomy-associated infections: A retrospective study of 243 patients

OBJECTIVE

Risk factors of ventriculostomy-associated infection (VAI) reported in the literature are variable due to heterogeneity of external ventricular drainage (EVD) procedures and management. This study aimed to assess the rate of VAI and its risk factors.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients older than 18 years who received EVD catheterizations between January 2015 and December 2020.

RESULTS

Among 243 patients with 355 catheters, twenty-three VAIs were identified, yielding VIA rates of 9.5% per patient and 6.5% per catheter. VAI was associated with a longer total EVD duration (29.2 days vs. 15.8 days, P < 0.001), a longer procedural time (72 minutes vs. 40 minutes, P < 0.001), intraoperative ventriculostomy (39.1% vs. 9.1%, P < 0.001), craniotomy (87.0% vs. 60.9%, P = 0.014), and other systemic infections (30.4% vs. 8.2%, P = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, a longer total EVD duration (OR = 1.086, P < 0.001), intraoperative ventriculostomy (OR = 6.119, P = 0.001), and other systemic infections (OR = 4.620, P = 0.015) were associated with VAI. There was no statistical difference between the VAI rates of patients with and without prophylactic EVD exchanges at mean 12.6 days (7.1% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.401).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative ventriculostomy was independently associated with VAI. Prophylactic EVD exchange at 12.6 days did not lower VAI rate.