Osteochondral resurfacing (OCRPRC) for capitate chondrosis in proximal row carpectomy

The use of resurfacing capitate pyrocarbon implants (RCPI) in chronic diseases of the wrist: outcomes of more than 100 cases

INTRODUCTION

In advanced chronic post-traumatic wrist pathology, the goal of surgery has always been to reduce pain while trying to preserve the function of the wrist itself as much as possible; numerous interventions have been developed to achieve these goals (partial arthrodesis, 4-angle arthrodesis, the use of prosthetic implants…).

PURPOSES

The purpose of the study is to evaluate outcomes and complications rate of proximal row carpectomy associated with the resurfacing capitate pyrocarbon implant (RCPI) for chronic diseases of the wrist.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the patients operated on between June 2004 and March 2021 was performed. Pain, wrist range of motion in flexion, extension, radial and ulnar deviation and grip strength were compared preoperatively and at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months. Complications and additional procedures were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients underwent surgery for proximal row carpectomy and placement of RCPI with a mean follow-up of 6.6 years. Between the preoperative and the 2-year follow-up, a reduction in pain (VAS from 7.3 to 0.5), an increase in grip strength (from 8 to 17 kg) and an increase in ROM in all planes (flexion from 19° to 44°, extension from 20° to 46°, radial deviation from 7° to 14° and ulnar deviation from 13° to 28°) were recorded. Ten (8.9%) patients required additional surgery, with only 2 (1.8%) patients requiring revision of the implant.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal row carpectomy associated with RCPI is an excellent surgical strategy to relieve pain and to improve wrist range of motion and grip strength in patients with chronic diseases of the wrist.

Proximal row carpectomy or scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis for treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse arthritis

Degenerative wrist conditions, such as scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse, often require salvage procedures to reduce pain and improve function. For early stages of disease, both proximal row carpectomy and scaphoid excision four-corner arthrodesis are viable motion-preserving options. There remains controversy on which technique is superior. Selection is a nuanced decision that requires consideration of patient characteristics and stage of disease. The traditional notion that proximal row carpectomy should be reserved for older individuals with low demands has been challenged; long-term studies in younger populations demonstrate similar patient-reported outcomes, pain relief and survivorship without conversion to total wrist arthrodesis between proximal row carpectomy and four-corner arthrodesis. The existing evidence suggests proximal row carpectomy has advantages of greater range of motion, fewer complications and lower costs. Advancements such as arthroscopic techniques for both procedures show potential, although mastery involves a steep learning curve.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Open and Arthroscopically-Assisted Mini Open Proximal Row Carpectomy for Lichtman Stage IIIB and IIIC Kienböck Disease

PURPOSE

Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) can be performed in the late stages of Kienböck disease using the traditional open technique or arthroscopically. In this study, we describe the arthroscopically-assisted mini-open PRC technique. The aim of the study was to compare the functional results with the open PRC technique in advanced-stage Kienböck disease.

METHODS

The medical records of patients with Kienböck disease who underwent open PRC between 2006-2010 (Cohort A) and arthroscopically-assisted PRC (AAPRC) between 2010-2018 (Cohort B) were analyzed. The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, visual analog scale, and Modified Mayo Wrist Scores were compared, which were obtained at the early postoperative (third month) and final follow-up.

RESULTS

Cohort A had 14 and Cohort B 21 patients. The preoperative, early, and final mean visual analog scale scores were 7, 3, and 0.3, respectively, for Cohort A, and 7, 0.3, and 0.1, respectively, for Cohort B. The preoperative mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores decreased from 69 to 34 at the third-month and 6.1 on the final follow-up visit for Cohort A and from 77 to 18, and 5 for Cohort B. The final Mayo wrist scores were excellent in 4, good in 4, and moderate in 6 of the Cohort A patients, and excellent in 11, good in 8, and moderate in 2 of the Cohort B patients. Mean flexion increased to 52° from 43° for Cohort A and to 62° from 41° for Cohort B.

CONCLUSIONS

AAPRC, compared to the open PRC, resulted in increased wrist motion and increased Mayo wrist scores in the long-term. Also, the third-month patient-related outcomes revealed favorable results in the AAPRC group. We attribute these findings to the earlier initiation of postoperative wrist motion and the less invasive character of the AAPRC procedure.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Proximal Row Carpectomy Modifications for Capitate Arthritis: A Systematic Review

Introduction  Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is a motion-sparing procedure for radiocarpal arthritis with reliable results. Traditionally, proximal capitate arthritis is a contraindication to PRC; however, PRC with modifications are proposed to circumvent this contraindication. PRC modifications can be broadly grouped into capitate resurfacing (CR) and capsular interposition (CI) procedures which could expand PRC indications. Our primary question was to characterize the outcomes achievable with various PRC modifications. Our secondary question was to determine which PRC modification was the optimal procedure when capitate arthritis was present. Methods  A systematic review was conducted to examine the outcomes of modified PRC procedures. Independent reviewers appraised multiple databases for PRC studies with modifications for capitate arthritis in adult patients (age >18 years) with a minimum of three cases and extractable outcomes. Modified PRC procedures included capsular/allograft interposition, resurfacing capitate pyrocarbon implants, and osteochondral grafting. Pertinent outcomes included patient demographics, range-of-motion, grip strength, patient-reported outcomes, and complications, including salvage rates. Results  Overall, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria-10 studies ( n  = 147) on CI and 8 studies on CR ( n  = 136). PRC with CI had the greatest flexion-extension arc and grip strength. Complications were marginally higher in the CR group (4%), while the CI group had a higher conversion to total wrist arthrodesis (10%). Conclusion  Techniques to address capitate arthritis center around resurfacing or soft tissue interposition. PRC modifications with CI produces better range-of-motion and grip strength but higher conversion to total wrist arthrodesis. Higher conversion rates may be attributable to longer follow-up periods in studies examining CI compared with CR. Level of Evidence  This is a Level III study.

Modified Graner's Technique with\without Vascularized Capitate Lengthening for Kienböck Disease Stage IIIb-A Pilot Study

Background  Intercarpal fusions are used to treat stage IIIb Kienböck disease. They increase force transfer across the radioscaphoid articulation with predisposition to arthritis. Description of Technique  This technique is excision of lunate followed by proximal transfer of capitate, with scaphocapitate and triquetrocapitate fusion to increase area of load transfer mimicking wrist hemiarthroplasty. Our purpose is to evaluate mid-term results of this technique. Patients and Methods  A prospective case series study was conducted on 11 patients with stage IIIb and IIIc. In seven cases, transfer of the capitate was performed by osteotomizing the capitate just distal to its waist, proximal migration to replace the excised lunate then bone grafting. In four cases, proximal transfer of vascularized pedicled capitate was done. Clinical outcome measures included pain (visual analog scale), grip strength, range of motion, and functional evaluation by modified Mayo wrist score and scoring system of Evans. Radiological outcome measures included healing of fusion mass, progression of the disease, and occurrence of avascular necrosis to the capitate. Results  Follow-up period averaged 54 months. Scaphocapitate fusion healing averaged 11 weeks. Union of the lengthened capitate occurred in 10 patients only. There was postoperative improvement in pain scores, grip, Evans, and modified Mayo wrist score. There was postoperative decrease in wrist flexion and extension. One patient showed resorption of the capitate head with progressive radioscaphoid arthritis-necessitated wrist fusion. Conclusion  The mid-term results of this technique may be satisfactory due to low incidence of degenerative arthritis in the radioscaphoid joint. However, longer follow-up with recruiting larger number of patients is needed.

Proximal Row Carpectomy Using Decellularized Dermal Allograft: Preliminary Results

Objective  The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of patients undergoing proximal row carpectomy (PRC) with interposition arthroplasty using a decellularized dermal allograft. Methods  Patients with a minimum of 1-year follow-up after undergoing a PRC using decellularized dermal allograft were contacted for clinical evaluation, radiographs, and postoperative outcome questionnaires, including the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire as well as the modified Likert scale for patient satisfaction. Nine of ten (90%) consecutive patients who were treated using this surgical technique were available for follow-up. Results  At a mean follow-up of 18 months, a total of nine patients achieved a mean flexion-extension arc of 113 degrees, pronosupination of 170.5 degrees, grip strength of 68 Ibs and pinch strength of 17 Ibs. Relative to the contralateral side, these values were 95, 100, 84 and 82%, respectively. There was significant improvement in the mean DASH score from 63.5 preoperatively to 23.8 postoperatively. Patient satisfaction postoperatively achieved a mean modified Likert score of 1.5. There was no evidence of radiocarpal joint space degeneration or dislocation in any of the patients. No patient suffered wound-related issues, foreign-body reaction to the graft, or other complications. Conclusion  PRC with interposition arthroplasty using a decellularized dermal allograft in patients with degenerative changes at the lunate fossa or capitate demonstrates short-term outcomes comparable to what has been reported for routine PRC in patients without degenerative changes affecting the radiocapitate joint. This method of interposition arthroplasty expands the indications for PRC and may help avoid salvage, motion-sacrificing procedures in select patients with late-stage wrist arthritis. Level of Evidence  This is a level IV, therapeutic study.

Resurfacing Capitate Pyrocarbon Implant Without Capitate Pole Resection to Improve Clinical Results in the Treatment of Chronic Wrist Arthritis

Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is a long-time, well-accepted, easy-to-reproduce procedure for the treatment of several painful degenerative conditions of the wrist, when capitate pole and radius lunate fossa are preserved. It has been reported to relieve pain and preserve a substantial wrist range of motion, although a partial loss of strength has to be expected because of the decreased length of the carpus. Since 2010, a new technique has been described in the literature using the resurfacing capitate pyrocarbon implant, combined with PRC. This implant has been designed to perform PRC even in the presence of degenerate joint surfaces, and thus resolves the limited indications of this procedure; however, if a resection of the capitate pole is performed to set up the implant, similar to PRC it may not positively influence the recovery of strength. The authors propose an resurfacing capitate pyrocarbon implant technique without any capitate bone resection, to preserve as much as possible the carpus length and so to improve the functional recovery. The surgical technique, is described in detail and preliminary results are discussed.

Management of scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse without proximal row carpectomy or four corner fusion

Four corner arthrodesis and proximal row carpectomy are the most common techniques for the management of advanced radiocarpal arthritis due to longstanding scapholunate instability and scaphoid nonunion. The advantages and short comings of each technique have been well defined in the literature. Advancements in joint replacement and arthroscopic surgery have resulted in new operations to manage radiocarpal and midcarpal arthritis. Most of these new procedures are modifications of the two classical operations, but some use modern implants and newer materials. New individualized options, like osteochondral grafting in combination with proximal row carpectomy or (arthroscopic) distal resection of the scaphoid, allowed us to improve our treatment and offer patients less invasive but equally effective procedures. We consider that four corner arthrodesis and proximal row carpectomy should not always be standard management for advanced radiocarpal arthritis.

Medial femoral trochlea flap reconstruction: Clinical outcomes and perspectives

INTRODUCTION

We report our experience with use of the medial femoral trochlea (MFT) osteochondral flap for carpal applications.

METHODS

Outcomes of all patients treated with MFT flaps were reviewed. Healing, range of motion, grip strength, carpal alignment, pain, and complication data were collected.

RESULTS

MFT flaps were performed on seven patients with a mean age of 26.1 (range, 17-42) years. Indications included scaphoid proximal pole nonunion (n = 3), Kienböck's disease (n = 3), and Preiser's disease (n = 1). The mean follow-up was 32.3 (range, 5-70) months. Union was achieved in five patients at a mean of 12 (range 6-22) weeks. All five patients had increased grip strength and absence of pain at follow-up. There were two failures due to graft resorption.

CONCLUSIONS

The MFT osteochondral flap is a technically challenging yet powerful tool to replace the loss of both carpal articular cartilage and adjacent bone.

Resurfacing capitate pyrocarbon implant after proximal row carpectomy: A litterature review

Up to a decade ago, to treat patients with chronic wrist pain due to advanced stages of arthritis, surgeons had four main solutions: partial or total wrist arthrodesis, total wrist prosthesis and proximal row carpectomy (PRC). Since 2010, a new technique has been described in literature using the Resurfacing Capitate Pyrocarbon Implant (RCPI), combined to PRC. The aim of this article is to review the literature and determine the indications, outcomes and complications associated with RCPI. An electronic literature research was carried out and pertinent articles were selected. Surgical technique, results and complications described in those articles are presented. From this review of the literature, authors conclude that Resurfacing Capitate Pyrocarbon Implant can be considered as a good alternative to arthrodesis and total wrist arthroplasty, at any ages, when proximal row carpectomy alone would not be indicated.

Proximal Row Carpectomy with Resurfacing Capitate Pyrocarbon Implant with Bone Graft for Scaphoid Nonunion Advanced Collapse III Wrist with Total Intramedullary Bone Resorption of the Capitate: A Case Report

Introduction:

One treatment of advanced carpal collapse with osteoarthritis of the midcarpal joint can be proximal row carpectomy (PRC) with pyrocarbon prosthesis implant, replacing the head of the capitate. We report a case of scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) III wrist with intramedullary bone resorption of the capitate.

Case Report:

A 55-year-old man had major functional impotence of the wrist and right hand with an extremely evolved SNAC III wrist with completely intramedullary bone resorption of the capitate. On the basis of this diagnosis and due to refractory severe pain that did not respond to conservative treatment, we discussed 3 therapeutic options: PRC with resurfacing capitate pyrocarbon implant (RCPI) in case of a possible large bone graft intraoperatively, a pyrocarbon intermediate prosthesis like adaptative proximal scaphoid implant which is interposed between the radius and the second carpal row, or a complete arthrodesis of the wrist. He was successfully managed by capitate pyrocarbon prosthesis associated with capitate bone graft. The patient presented no pain and was satisfied with the operation. The X-ray showed a stable prosthesis.

Conclusion:

Treatment of advanced carpal collapse with osteoarthritis of the midcarpal joint can be PRC with RCPI. However, when bone resorption of the capitate exists, surgical treatment usually is a wrist arthrodesis which is a good pain relief but blocks all movements. PRC with RCPI with bone graft can be a good alternative solution with pain relief and preservation of wrist mobility.

Nonvascularized Cartilage Grafts Versus Vascularized Cartilage Flaps: Comparison of Cartilage Quality 6 Months After Transfer

PURPOSE

Subchondral perfusion of osteochondral grafts has been shown to be important in preventing long-term cartilage degeneration. In carpal reconstruction, subchondral perfusion from the graft bed is limited. This study's purpose was to compare the histological characteristics of cartilage in osteochondral grafts supported by synovial imbibition alone to cartilage of vascularized osteochondral flaps that have both synovial and vascular pedicle perfusion.

METHODS

Two adjacent osteochondral segments were harvested on the medial femoral trochlea in domestic 6- to 8-month-old pigs. Each segment measured approximately 12 mm × 15 mm × 17 mm. One segment was maintained on the descending geniculate artery vascular pedicle. The adjacent segment was separated from the pedicle to serve as a nonvascularized graft. A thin layer of methylmethacrylate cement was used to line the harvest site defect to prevent vascular ingrowth to the subsequently replaced specimens. The pigs were maintained on a high-calorie feed and returned to ambulation and full weight-bearing on the surgical legs. The animals were sacrificed after 6 months and the specimens were reharvested, sectioned, and examined. The cartilage was graded by 2 pathologists blinded to the origin of specimens as vascularized flaps or nonvascularized grafts.

RESULTS

All specimens were assigned scores utilizing the International Cartilage Repair Society grading system. Scoring for chondrocyte viability, cartilage surface morphology, and cell and matrix appearance was significantly higher in the vascularized osteochondral group than in the graft group.

CONCLUSIONS

When deprived of subchondral perfusion from underlying bone, osteochondral vascularized flaps in an intrasynovial environment demonstrate superior cartilage quality and survival compared with nonvascularized grafts.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In locations in which perfusion from surrounding bone may be limited (ie, proximal scaphoid or proximal lunate reconstruction), articular reconstruction using vascularized osteochondral flaps will yield superior cartilage organization and architecture than nonvascularized osteochondral grafts. The clinical and functional relevance of this finding requires further study.

The use of osteochondral flaps in the treatment of carpal disorders

Vascularized osteochondral flaps have been described for use in reconstruction of the wrist, providing the benefits of osteochondral grafts in addition to the benefit of osseous and subchondral perfusion via the microvascular pedicle. Various harvest sites have been described including the medial and lateral femoral trochlea and the proximal third metatarsal. The reconstructed surfaces described include the cartilage surfaces of the scaphoid, lunate, capitate and radius. The ability to transfer analogous osteochondral surfaces poses the possibility for new motion-preserving alternatives for difficult articular problems previously treated with salvage procedures. A description of the procedures and reported outcomes are provided, as well as a discussion of the role of these procedures in the future of wrist surgery.

Update on the operative treatment of scapholunate instability for radiologists. II. Salvage procedures, total wrist arthrodesis, and total wrist arthroplasty

Scapholunate (SL) instability is the most common form of carpal instability. Imaging (especially radiography) plays an important role in the staging, management, and postoperative follow-up of SL instability. In the final stage of SL instability, known as scapholunate advanced collapse, progressive degenerative changes occur at the carpal level. The goals of this article are to review the surgical options available for addressing the different stages of scapholunate advanced collapse, along with an emphasis on normal postoperative imaging and complications associated with each surgical option.

Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 mapping at 3T MRI of the wrist: Feasibility and clinical application

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T₂ mapping for biochemical imaging of the wrist at 3T.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients with wrist pain (mean age, 41.4 ± 13.1 years) including a subgroup with chondromalacia (n = 11) and 15 healthy volunteers (26.0 ± 2.2 years) underwent dGEMRIC and T₂ mapping at 3T. For dGEMRIC, the optimum time window after contrast-injection (gadopentetate dimeglumine) was defined as the plateau of the T₁ curve of repeated measurements 15-90 minutes postinjection and assessed in all volunteers. Reference values of healthy-appearing cartilage from all individuals and values in areas of chondromalacia were assessed using region-of-interest analyses. Receiver-operating-characteristic analyses were applied to assess discriminatory ability between damaged and normal cartilage.

RESULTS

The optimum time window was 45-90 minutes, and the 60-minute timepoint was subsequently used. In chondromalacia, dGEMRIC values were lower (551 ± 84 msec, P < 0.001), and T₂ values higher (63.9 ± 17.7, P = 0.001) compared to healthy-appearing cartilage of the same patient. Areas under the curve did not significantly differ between dGEMRIC (0.91) and T₂ mapping (0.99; P = 0.17). In healthy-appearing cartilage of volunteers and patients, mean dGEMRIC values were 731.3 ± 47.1 msec and 674.6 ± 72.1 msec (P = 0.01), and mean T₂ values were 36.5 ± 5 msec and 41.1 ± 3.2 msec (P = 0.009), respectively.

CONCLUSION

At 3T, dGEMRIC and T₂ mapping are feasible for biochemical cartilage imaging of the wrist. Both techniques allow separation and biochemical assessment of thin opposing cartilage surfaces and can distinguish between healthy and damaged cartilage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:381-389.

[Proximal carpal row carpectomy]

OBJECTIVE

Resection of the proximal carpal row, termed proximal row carpectomy (PRC), is performed in order to treat pathologies of the proximal carpal row or radiocarpal joint between the scaphoid and scaphoid facet. It entails the articulation of the capitate and the lunate facet.

INDICATIONS

Lunate necrosis, carpal collapse, joint infection with concomitant intercarpal ligament lesions.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Severe cartilage lesions of the lunate facet and the capitate, wrist capsule laxity, rheumatoid arthritis, neuromuscular dysbalance of the wrist-covering soft tissue structures.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Dorsal approach to the wrist, incision of the third and fourth extensor compartments, resection and coagulation of the dorsal interosseous nerve, usage of a ligament-sparing capsule incision, identification of the proximal carpal row and inspection of cartilage of the lunate facet and capitate, mobilization and excision of the lunate, scaphoid and triquetrum, articulation of lunate facet and capitate is controlled clinically and fluoroscopically, wound closure, application of plaster slabs.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Immobilization of the wrist on plaster slabs for 2 weeks, removal of sutures after 14 days.

RESULTS

PRC is a surgical procedure with few complications. Satisfactory range of motion and grip strength could be preserved without limiting function of the upper extremity. Postoperative osteoarthritis of capitate and lunate facet did not correlate with the good clinical outcome.

Salvage Operations for Wrist Ligament Injuries with Secondary Arthrosis

Wrist ligamentous injuries can be challenging to treat successfully. In some cases the ligament repair or reconstruction fails, resulting in instability and progressive degenerative changes. In other cases the original injury is missed, and the patient presents for the first time with established wrist arthritis. Multiple operations have been devised to treat patients with arthrosis secondary to wrist ligament injuries. This article discusses definitive salvage operations such as intercarpal arthrodeses and proximal row carpectomy, as well as other alternatives such as wrist denervation and radial styloidectomy.

Proximal Row Carpectomy

Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) has earned a respected place in the hand surgeon's armamentarium. Prerequisites for the standard PRC are good cartilage on the proximal pole of capitate and in the lunate fossa of radius. If there is cartilage damage on the proximal pole of capitate, the modification of Salomon and Eaton is a reasonable alternative to the standard PRC. The most important surgical step is preservation of the radioscaphocapitate ligament. Good long-term results can be achieved, and with careful patient selection the operation can be done successfully in people who use their hands for heavy work.

Osteochondral resurfacing with proximal row carpectomy: 8-year follow-up

Degenerative arthrosis of the proximal row remains a challenging problem for both patients and surgeons. Proximal row carpectomy is a motion-preserving treatment option, with studies documenting acceptable long-term outcomes. Proximal row carpectomy is an attractive option because there is no need for fusion to occur between the carpal bones, as in 4-corner fusion. As a result, laborers and smokers may be able to return to work more quickly. However, capitate chondrosis traditionally has been considered a contraindication to proximal row carpectomy. The goal of this study was to review the long-term follow-up of patients who underwent osteochondral resurfacing of capitate chondrosis performed in the same setting as proximal row carpectomy. Final follow-up was obtained in 5 of 8 (63%) patients at an average of 101 months (range, 99-102) after surgery. Grip strength improved at each time point, but wrist flexion and extension decreased. The average Mayo Wrist Score was 74 (range, 65-85) and remained stable or improved in all patients between the 18-month visit and the final visit. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score was unchanged at final follow-up compared with 18-month follow-up (P=.7). This study found that osteochondral resurfacing of the capitate in the setting of proximal row carpectomy for patients with capitate chondrosis offers good outcomes compared with standard proximal row carpectomy in patients without capitate chondrosis on patient-directed outcome tools (DASH, Mayo Wrist Score) at long-term follow-up of 101 months.

The use of a pyrocarbon capitate resurfacing implant in chronic wrist disorders

The present study describes the technique and results of proximal row carpectomy with resection of the head of the capitate and replacement with a pyrocarbon capitate resurfacing implant. The major indication for surgical treatment was arthritic changes on the head of the capitate. Patients were assessed by range of motion, grip strength, pain and functional scoring, and radiographic studies. In most patients, wrist function was improved and pain relief was obtained. This surgical procedure may represent a good alternative to total and partial wrist arthrodesis.

Technique: Osteochondral Grafting of Capitate Chondrosis in PRC

Background Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is a useful treatment option for wrist arthritis, but the operation is contraindicated when there is arthritis of the capitate head. We describe a technique that involves resurfacing of a capitate that has focal chondrosis, using an osteochondral graft harvested from the resected carpal bones. Materials and Methods PRC patients who had a focal area of capitate chondrosis underwent osteochondral grafting of the capitate. Pre- and postoperative pain level, employment status, motion, grip strength, and Modified Mayo Wrist Scores (MMWS) were assessed. Postoperative Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores were also calculated. Description of Technique The articular surface of the capitate is assessed for need for grafting. The proximal row is resected with the lunate removed intact. The arthritic area is prepared. The graft is taken from the lunate and placed in the prepared site of the capitate. Results Eight patients (average age of 53 years) were followed for 18 months. Pain: Preoperatively, moderate to severe in 7 patients; postoperatively, mild to no pain in 7 patients. Motion: Preoperative, 84° (74% of the contralateral side); postoperative 75° (66%). Grip Strength: Preoperative, 29 kg (62%); postoperative, 34 kg (71%). Mayo Wrist Score: Preoperative, 51 (poor); postoperative, 68 (fair). Average postoperative DASH score was 19.5. Follow-up radiographs showed that 75% of patients had mild to no degeneration. Conclusions Osteochondral grafting in PRC offers satisfactory results in terms of pain relief, return to work, motion, and grip strength. Level of Evidence Therapeutic IV, Case series.

Vascularized medial femoral trochlea osteocartilaginous flap reconstruction of proximal pole scaphoid nonunions

PURPOSE

The descending geniculate artery's branching pattern includes periosteal vessels supplying the cartilage-bearing trochlea of the medial patellofemoral joint. Previous cadaveric studies described anatomic similarities between the greater curvature of the proximal scaphoid and the convex surface of the medial femoral trochlea (MFT). We describe the technique and report our first 16 consecutive cases of vascularized osteocartilaginous arthroplasty for chronic scaphoid proximal pole nonunions using the MFT, with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up.

METHODS

Chart reviews of 16 consecutive cases of osteocartilaginous MFT flap transfers for scaphoid reconstruction were performed at 2 institutions. Follow-up data were recorded at a minimum of 6 months, with an average of 14 months (range, 6-72 mo). Patient age and sex, duration of nonunion, number of previous surgical procedures, surgical technique, achievement of osseous union, preoperative and postoperative scapholunate angles, preoperative and postoperative range of motion, and pain relief were recorded.

RESULTS

Computed tomography imaging confirmed healing in 15 of 16 reconstructed scaphoids. Mean patient age was 30 years (range, 18-47 y). The average number of previous surgical procedures was 1 (range, 0-3). All patients experienced some wrist pain improvement (12/16 complete relief, 4/16 incomplete relief). Wrist range of motion at follow-up averaged 46° extension (range, 28° to 80°) and 44° flexion (range, 10° to 80°), which was similar to preoperative measurements (average 46° extension and 43° flexion). Scapholunate relationship remained unchanged with average scapholunate angles of 52° before surgery and 49° after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteochondral vascularized MFT flaps provide a reliable means of achieving resolution of difficult proximal pole scaphoid nonunions. These flaps allow resection of the proximal portion of the unhealed scaphoid and reconstruction with an anatomically analogous convex segment of cartilage-bearing bone. This technique provides the advantages of vascularized bone and ease of fixation. Early follow-up demonstrates a high rate of union with acceptable motion and pain relief.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Early follow-up suggests that the vascularized MFT osteocartilaginous flap is a valuable tool for treating challenging proximal pole scaphoid nonunions.

Scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrist arthritis

Scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) are the two most common patterns of posttraumatic wrist arthritis. This review discusses the etiology and clinical evaluation, as well as up-to-date treatment options, for both of these conditions. Classic as well as newer innovative techniques are discussed with clinical outcomes in order to provide an evidence-based review of the world's literature on SLAC/SNAC wrist.

Proximal row carpectomy

Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is a motion-preserving treatment for the degenerated wrist. PRC provides painless wrist range of motion with few complications. PRC treats specifically scapholunate advanced collapse, scaphoid non-union advanced collapse, chronic perilunate dislocations, and Kienbock's disease. The best candidates are older than 35 with an intact capitate head and lunate facet of the distal radius. Proximal row carpectomy provides satisfactory postoperative wrist range of motion and grip strength with few complications, especially when there is no capitolunate arthrosis. Postoperative progressive changes at the radiocapitate articulation have been documented, yet these changes tend to remain asymptomatic.

Proximal row carpectomy with capitate osteochondral autograft transplantation

Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is an effective treatment option for degenerative or posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the wrist in conditions such as scapholunate advanced collapse, scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse, Kienbock disease, and chronic fracture dislocations of the carpus. PRC involves excision of the scaphoid, lunate, and triquetrum, and relies on the articulation of the remaining capitate from the distal row to articulate with the lunate fossa. PRC offers the potential advantage of greater range of motion, technical ease, and decreased immobilization, and eliminates specific complications found with other motion-preserving procedures such as nonunion, hardware irritation, and impingement. An established relative contraindication for PRC is the presence of advanced capitolunate arthritis. Many authors have offered modifications of the traditional PRC procedure to account for the presence of capitate arthritis. A PRC technique utilizing an osteochondral autograft, from the carpal bank of excised bones, for transfer to the capitate defect is described.

Scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse arthritis--update on evaluation and treatment

Scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse are common patterns of wrist arthritis. Scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse is caused by trauma, whereas SLAC wrist may also result from chronic pseudogout and can appear bilaterally without a clear history of injury. Surgical treatment for SLAC wrist includes 4-corner arthrodesis, capitolunate arthrodesis, complete wrist arthrodesis, proximal row carpectomy (PRC), denervation, and radial styloidectomy. Scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse wrist has the additional surgical option of excision of the distal ununited scaphoid fragment. Controversy persists over the relative merits of PRC versus 4-corner arthrodesis and whether PRC may be performed in the setting of capitate arthritis.

Vascularized osteochondral graft from the medial femoral trochlea: anatomical study and clinical perspectives

PURPOSE

Few donor sites for vascularized reconstruction of convex joint surfaces have been described. We studied the feasibility of a convex vascularized osteochondral graft harvested from the medial femoral condyle and trochlea, on an anatomical and practical point of view.

METHODS

An injection-corrosion technique was used on 16 fresh cadaver specimens, and completed by a modified Spalteholz clearing. The extra- and intraosseous vascularization of the medial femoral condyle was systematized and the luminal diameter of the arteries was microscopically measured. Radii of curvature of the medial trochlea and of the carpal bones were measured on arthro-CT-scanner reconstructed images.

RESULTS

The periosteal vessels of the medial condyle are responsible for the whole peripheral intraosseous vascularization, without any watershed region. They are fed by the articular branch of the descending genicular artery and/or the superomedial genicular artery. Several constant vascular axes can be found, and may serve as a pedicle for a vascularized osteochondral graft from the medial femoral trochlea. The radii of curvature of this graft do fit those of the proximal carpal row. A simple surgical approach is suggested.

CONCLUSIONS

A vascularized graft harvested on the medial femoral trochlea is a technically feasible procedure that could represent a new reconstructive tool for convex joint surfaces. Osteonecrosis of the proximal pole of the scaphoid or Kienböck's disease are among several situations where such a graft could be beneficial.

Proximal row carpectomy with capsular interposition arthroplasty for advanced arthritis of the wrist

Advanced osteoarthritis of the wrist or the distal articulation of the lunate with the capitate has traditionally been treated surgically by arthrodesis. In order to maintain movement, we performed proximal row carpectomy with capsular interposition arthroplasty as an alternative to arthrodesis in eight patients with advanced arthritis and retrospectively reviewed their clinical and radiographic outcomes after a mean follow-up of 41 months (13 to 53). The visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain at its worst and at rest, and the patient-rated wrist evaluation score improved significantly after surgery, whereas ranges of movement and grip strength were maintained at the pre-operative levels. Progression of arthritis in the radiocapitate joint was observed in three patients, but their outcomes were not significantly different from those without progression of arthritis.

Proximal row carpectomy with capsular interposition arthroplasty is a reasonable option for the treatment of patients with advanced arthritis of the wrist.

Osteochondral autologous transplantation for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the shoulder

We describe the outcome at a mean follow-up of 8.75 years (7.6 to 9.8) of seven patients who had undergone osteochondral autologous transplantation for full-thickness cartilage defects of the shoulder between 1998 and 2000. These patients have been described previously at a mean of 32.6 months when eight were included. One patient has been lost to follow-up. The outcome was assessed by the Constant shoulder score and the Lysholm knee score to assess any donor-site morbidity. Standard radiographs and MR scores were obtained and compared with the pre-operative findings and the results from the previous review.

No patient required any further surgery on the shoulder. The mean Constant score improved significantly until the final follow-up (p = 0.018). The Lysholm score remained excellent throughout. There was a significant progression of osteoarthritic changes from the initial surgery to the first and final follow-up but this did not appear to be related to the size of the defect, the number of cylinders required or the Constant score (p = 0.016). MRI showed that all except one patient had a congruent joint surface at the defect with full bony integration of all osteochondral cylinders.

The results have remained satisfactory over a longer period with very good objective and subjective findings.