New Evidence Supporting Cyclosporine Efficacy in Epidermal Necrolysis

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: Updates in pathophysiology and management

ABSTRACT

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are life-threatening conditions characterized by extensive detachment of the epidermis and mucous membranes. These severe disorders carry a high mortality rate, and their pathogenesis remains largely unclear. Furthermore, optimal therapeutic strategies for SJS/TEN remain a subject of ongoing debate. Early diagnosis of SJS/TEN is challenging, and reliable biomarkers for diagnosis or severity prediction have not been firmly established. Certain drugs, such as carbamazepine and allopurinol, have shown a strong association with specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) types. Recently, the potential benefits of HLA screening prior to administering these drugs to reduce the incidence of SJS/TEN have been explored. Epidermal cell death in SJS/TEN lesions is caused by extensive apoptosis, primarily through the Fas-FasL and perforin/granzyme pathways. Our findings suggest that necroptosis, a form of programmed necrosis, also contributes to epidermal cell death. Annexin A1, released from monocytes, interacts with the formyl peptide receptor 1 to induce necroptosis. Several biomarkers, such as CC chemokine ligand (CCL)-27, interleukin-15, galectin-7, receptor-interacting protein kinases 3 (RIP3), and lipocalin-2, have been identified for diagnostic and prognostic purposes in SJS/TEN. Supportive care is recommended for treating SJS/TEN, but the efficacy of various therapeutic options-including systemic corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, cyclosporine, and tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists-remains controversial. Recent studies have investigated the potential benefits of tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the understanding and management of SJS/TEN.

Effectiveness of early treatment with plasma exchange in patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) are potentially fatal medical conditions that lack established treatment. Therapeutic plasma exchange (PE) is a potential treatment option; however, its effectiveness is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PE in patients with SJS/TEN. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Japanese National Administrative Claims database from 2016 to 2021. The analysis included 256 patients diagnosed with SJS/TEN who were admitted to the intensive care unit, of whom 38 received PE and 218 did not. The outcomes of patients who did and did not receive PE within the first 24 h of admission were compared. The risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals of the PE group compared with those of the no-PE group were as follows: in-hospital mortality, 0.983 (0.870-1.155); 30-day mortality rate, 1.057 (0.954-1.217); 50-day mortality rate, 1.023 (0.916-1.186); and length of hospital stay, 1.163 (0.762-1.365). This study does not provide evidence of a benefit of PE in reducing mortality or length of hospital stay in patients with severe SJS/TEN.

[Severe cutaneous drug reactions in children]

Severe cutaneous drug reactions also occur in children and range from reactions with blister forming of skin and mucosa to extensive exanthems with altered differential blood count and involvement of internal organs. The first group includes Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), which are considered as one disease entity with different degrees of severity and are also referred to as "epidermal" or "epithelial necrolysis" (EN). The group of drug reactions with primarily systemic alterations is represented by a condition known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS).Although EN is generally considered as a drug reaction, a causative agent can only be identified in about 50% of all pediatric cases. Once a clear diagnosis is established, specific treatment measures should be carried out, whereby discontinuation of the causative agent plays a decisive role in drug-induced cases. In order to be able to identify and discontinue the drug responsible, a detailed medication history must be obtained. Certain antiepileptic drugs, sulfonamides and sulfasalazine are among the most frequent triggers of EN and DRESS in children. Supportive therapy including appropriate topical treatment, pain management and ophthalmological consultations are of utmost importance in EN but a short-term immunomodulating treatment with cyclosporine A has been shown to be helpful. In contrast, in DRESS middle to long-term systemic treatment with glucocorticosteroids is recommended.

Disease severity and status in Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: Key knowledge gaps and research needs

Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) are on a spectrum of cutaneous drug reactions characterized by pan-epidermal necrosis with SJS affecting < 10% of body surface area (BSA), TEN > 30%, and SJS/TEN overlap between 10 and 30%. Severity-of-illness score for toxic epidermal necrolysis (SCORTEN) is a validated tool to predict mortality rates based on age, heart rate, BSA, malignancy and serum urea, bicarbonate, and glucose. Despite improved understanding, SJS/TEN mortality remains constant and therapeutic interventions are not universally accepted for a number of reasons, including rarity of SJS/TEN; inconsistent definition of cases, disease severity, and endpoints in studies; low efficacy of interventions; and variations in treatment protocols. Apart from mortality, none of the other endpoints used to evaluate interventions, including duration of hospitalization, is sufficiently standardized to be reproducible across cases and treatment centers. Some of the gaps in SJS/TEN research can be narrowed through international collaboration to harmonize research endpoints. A case is made for an urgent international collaborative effort to develop consensus on definitions of endpoints such as disease status, progression, cessation, and complete re-epithelialization in interventional studies. The deficiencies of using BSA as the sole determinant of SJS/TEN severity, excluding internal organ involvement and extension of skin necrosis beyond the epidermis, are discussed and the role these factors play on time to healing and mortality beyond the acute stage is highlighted. The potential role of artificial intelligence, biomarkers, and PET/CT scan with radiolabeled glucose as markers of disease status, activity, and therapeutic response is also discussed.

Mechanism of Lethal Skin Toxicities Induced by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors and Related Treatment Strategies

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors are widely used to treat various types of cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer. Adverse reactions such as skin toxicity, interstitial lung disease, hepatotoxicity, ocular toxicity, hypomagnesemia, stomatitis, and diarrhea may occur during treatment. Because the EGFR signaling pathway is important for maintaining normal physiological skin function. Adverse skin reactions occurred in up to 90% of cancer patients treated with EGFR inhibitors, including common skin toxicities (such as papulopustular exanthemas, paronychia, hair changes) and rare fatal skin toxicities (e.g., Stevens–Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis). This has led to the dose reduction or discontinuation of EGFR inhibitors in the treatment of cancer. Recently, progress has been made about research on the skin toxicity of EGFR inhibitors. Here, we summarize the mechanism of skin toxicity caused by EGFR inhibitors, measures to prevent severe fatal skin toxicity, and provide reference for medical staff how to give care and treatment after adverse skin reactions.

A contemporary snippet on clinical presentation and management of toxic epidermal necrolysis

Introduction

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is one of the most severe cutaneous adverse reactions with a mortality rate of 30%. Due to a lack of consensus regarding the treatment and management of TEN, therapy is individualized on a case-to-case basis.

Purpose

The scientific literature about Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and TEN is summarized and assessed to aid and assist in determining the optimal course of treatment.

Methods

PubMed and Google Scholar, among others, were searched with the keywords: “Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis”, “corticosteroids”, “cyclosporine”, “etanercept”, “intravenous immunoglobulin”, “Stevens-Johnson syndrome” and filtered by year. The research articles generated by the search, and their references, were reviewed.

Results

TEN is a severe dermatological condition that is mainly caused by medicines. World-wide guidelines differ in care plans. As there is no consensus on the management of TEN, this article aims to summarize the efficacy and feasibility of the management aspect of TEN from previous studies. Supportive care is highly accepted, along with early discontinuation of all medicines (hydration & electrolytes). Corticosteroids and cyclosporine have been used in therapy. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is currently being administered; however, their efficacy by themselves and in combination remains uncertain.

Conclusion

Current evidence predominantly from retrospective studies suggests no individual treatment has sufficient efficacy and a multi-faceted regimen stands to be favored. Therapeutic regimens from corticosteroids to IVIG are under constant evaluation. The life-threatening nature of TEN warrants further confirmation with more extensive, robust randomized, controlled trials.

Lay Summary

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a serious skin reaction with a 30% chance of mortality. Commonly TEN is caused by medicines and results in a burn like appearance and sensation in patients. Usually administered medicine is cleared effectively by the human body but when the clearance of few metabolites from medicine is disrupted due to few genes, it leads to an ominous response by the body. This response involves several intermediate chemicals that primarily attack skin cells. Treatment guidelines differ globally. Supportive care is highly accepted, along with early discontinuation of all medicine. Currently, a multi-faceted treatment regimen is favored. Treatments like corticosteroids to immunoglobulins are under constant evaluation. Identification of the perfect combination of treatment needs confirmation from robust randomized controlled trials.

Drug eruptions with novel targeted therapies - immune checkpoint and EGFR inhibitors

Given the increasing use of novel targeted therapies, dermatologists are constantly confronted with novel cutaneous side effects of these agents. A rapid diagnosis and appropriate management of these side effects are crucial to prevent impairment of the patients' quality of life and interruptions of essential cancer treatments. Immune checkpoint and EGFR inhibitors are frequently used targeted therapies for various malignancies and are associated with a distinct spectrum of cutaneous adverse events. Exanthematous drug eruptions represent a particular diagnostic challenge in these patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors can elicit a plethora of immune-related exanthemas, most commonly maculopapular, lichenoid, and psoriasiform eruptions. Additionally, autoimmune bullous dermatoses and exanthemas associated with connective tissue diseases may arise. In cases of severe, atypical or therapy-resistant presentations an extensive dermatological investigation including a skin biopsy is recommended. Topical and systemic steroids are the mainstay of treatment. Papulopustular eruptions represent the major cutaneous adverse effect of EGFR inhibitor therapy, occurring in up to 90 % of patients within the first two weeks of therapy, depending on the agent. Besides topical antibiotics and steroids, oral tetracyclines are the first choice in systemic treatment and can also be used as prophylaxis.

Recent advances in managing and understanding Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are life-threatening diseases characterized by detachment of the epidermis and mucous membrane. SJS/TEN are considered to be on the same spectrum of diseases with different severities. They are classified by the percentage of skin detachment area. SJS/TEN can also cause several complications in the liver, kidneys, and respiratory tract. The pathogenesis of SJS/TEN is still unclear. Although it is difficult to diagnose early stage SJS/TEN, biomarkers for diagnosis or severity prediction have not been well established. Furthermore, optimal therapeutic options for SJS/TEN are still controversial.

Several drugs, such as carbamazepine and allopurinol, are reported to have a strong relationship with a specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) type. This relationship differs between different ethnicities. Recently, the usefulness of HLA screening before administering specific drugs to decrease the incidence of SJS/TEN has been investigated.

Skin detachment in SJS/TEN skin lesions is caused by extensive epidermal cell death, which has been considered to be apoptosis via the Fas-FasL pathway or perforin/granzyme pathway. We reported that necroptosis, i.e. programmed necrosis, also contributes to epidermal cell death. Annexin A1, released from monocytes, and its interaction with the formyl peptide receptor 1 induce necroptosis. Several diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers for SJS/TEN have been reported, such as CCL-27, IL-15, galectin-7, and RIP3.

Supportive care is recommended for the treatment of SJS/TEN. However, optimal therapeutic options such as systemic corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, cyclosporine, and TNF-α antagonists are still controversial. Recently, the beneficial effects of cyclosporine and TNF-α antagonists have been explored. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the pathophysiology and management of SJS/TEN.

Erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis - diagnosis and treatment

Prior to the first international consensus classification published in 1993, the clinical distinction between erythema multiforme (EM), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) had been subject to uncertainty and controversy for more than a century. Based on this classification, the three conditions are defined by the morphology of the individual lesions and their pattern of distribution. Etiopathogenetically, the majority of EM cases is caused by infections (primarily herpes simplex virus and Mycoplasma pneumoniae), whereas SJS/TEN are predominantly triggered by drugs. The SCORTEN (score of toxic epidermal necrolysis) can and should be used to assess disease prognosis in patients with SJS/TEN. While supportive treatment is generally considered sufficient for EM, there is still uncertainty as to the type of systemic therapy required for SJS/TEN. Given the lack of high-quality therapeutic trials and (in some cases) conflicting results, it is currently impossible to issue definitive recommendations for any given immunomodulatory therapy. While there is always a trade-off between rapid onset of treatment-induced immunosuppression and an uptick in infection risk, there has been increasing evidence that cyclosporine in particular may be able to halt disease progression (i.e. skin detachment) and lower mortality rates. Assistance in diagnosis and management of the aforementioned conditions may be obtained from the Center for the Documentation of Severe Skin Reactions (dZh) at the Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.

EAACI position paper on how to classify cutaneous manifestations of drug hypersensitivity

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are common, and the skin is by far the most frequently involved organ with a broad spectrum of reaction types. The diagnosis of cutaneous DHRs (CDHR) may be difficult because of multiple differential diagnoses. A correct classification is important for the correct diagnosis and management. With these guidelines, we aim to give precise definitions and provide the background needed for doctors to correctly classify CDHR.

Severe Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions: Presentation, Risk Factors, and Management

PURPOSE OF STUDY

Immune-mediated adverse drug reactions occur commonly in clinical practice and include mild, self-limited cutaneous eruptions, IgE-mediated hypersensitivity, and severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCAR). SCARs represent an uncommon but potentially life-threatening form of delayed T cell-mediated reaction. The spectrum of illness ranges from acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) to drug reaction with eosinophilia with systemic symptoms (DRESS), to the most severe form of illness, Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).

RECENT FINDINGS

There is emerging literature on the efficacy of cyclosporine in decreasing mortality in SJS/TEN. The purpose of our review is to discuss the typical presentations of these conditions, with a special focus on identifying the culprit medication. We review risk factors for developing SCAR, including HLA alleles strongly associated with drug hypersensitivity. We conclude by discussing current strategies for the management of these conditions.

SJS/TEN 2017: Building Multidisciplinary Networks to Drive Science and Translation

Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) is a life-threatening, immunologically mediated, and usually drug-induced disease with a high burden to individuals, their families, and society with an annual incidence of 1 to 5 per 1,000,000. To effect significant reduction in short- and long-term morbidity and mortality, and advance clinical care and research, coordination of multiple medical, surgical, behavioral, and basic scientific disciplines is required. On March 2, 2017, an investigator-driven meeting was held immediately before the American Academy of Dermatology Annual meeting for the central purpose of assembling, for the first time in the United States, clinicians and scientists from multiple disciplines involved in SJS/TEN clinical care and basic science research. As a product of this meeting, this article summarizes the current state of knowledge and expert opinion related to SJS/TEN covering a broad spectrum of topics including epidemiology and pharmacogenomic networks; clinical management and complications; special populations such as pediatrics, the elderly, and pregnant women; regulatory issues and the electronic health record; new agents that cause SJS/TEN; pharmacogenomics and immunopathogenesis; and the patient perspective. Goals include the maintenance of a durable and productive multidisciplinary network that will significantly further scientific progress and translation into prevention, early diagnosis, and management of SJS/TEN.