Generation and Validation of the PROMIS Itch Questionnaire - Child to Measure the Impact of Itch on Life Quality

Improved patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes distinguish tacrolimus 0.03% from crisaborole in children with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin disease that affects 20% of children worldwide and is associated with low patient-reported quality of life (QoL). Crisaborole (CRIS) and tacrolimus 0.03% (TAC) are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved topical treatments for mild to moderate AD with similar clinical efficacy. Utilization of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may provide meaningful data on the impact of AD treatments on patients and caregivers. This study used PROs to monitor the impact of crisaborole (CRIS) and tacrolimus 0.03% (TAC) on children with mild/moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) and caregiver burden.

METHODS

This open-label study randomized 47 child-caregiver dyads to CRIS or TAC for 12 weeks. Disease severity, child quality of life (QoL), itch, pain interference, anxiety, depression, sleep, caregiver burden and caregiver QoL were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 36 dyads completed the study. Children (mean age = 8.0 ± 3.9 years) had mild baseline AD and were diverse by race (39% white; 36% Black) and gender (53% males). Caregivers were mostly female (78%; mean age = 37 ± 7.6 years). Both arms improved disease severity (Eczema Area and Severity Index) from baseline to 12 weeks (CRIS = -2.4 vs. TAC = -1.9). Within-arm analyses comparing baseline to 12 weeks revealed TAC, but not CRIS, improved all child and caregiver PROs except sleep (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated that topical treatment for 12 weeks was more beneficial than 6 weeks, with TAC improving more PROs than CRIS. Future trials should implement PROs to fully understand the impact of AD treatments.

Burden of impaired sleep and its improvement through topical treatment in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis

INTRODUCTION

Patients with chronic inflammatory skin diseases often suffer from sleep disturbances. However, objective data on sleep architecture, especially to evaluate potential overall influences under therapy, are lacking.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pilot study on sleep quality changes including psoriasis and atopic dermatitis patients before and 2 weeks after intensive topical treatment. In addition to disease activity rating, patient-rated outcomes for itch severity and sleep quality and polygraphy was performed before and after topical therapy.

RESULTS

14 psoriasis, eleven atopic dermatitis patients (10 female, 15 male) with a mean age of 49 years were included. Disease activity scores (EASI and PASI) were significantly reduced with topical therapy after 2 weeks (p < 0.001). Pruritus intensity (NRS) showed a significant influence on deep sleep, which resolved after therapy. Insomnia severity significantly decreased (r > 0.50, p < 0.05) and daytime sleepiness showed a significant reduction in 40% of patients. N3 (deep sleep) and REM sleep significantly improved, showing a strong effect (r > 0.50). The apnea-hypopnea index decreased in one of four patients independent of the individual BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Through polygraphy, we demonstrated impaired sleep patterns in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis patients with itch as a relevant factor and beyond that, rapid sleep improvement under 2 weeks of topical treatment.

Belastung durch gestörten Schlaf und dessen Verbesserung durch topische Behandlung bei Psoriasis und atopischer Dermatitis

INTRODUCTION

Patients with chronic inflammatory skin diseases often suffer from sleep disturbances. However, objective data on sleep architecture, especially to evaluate potential overall influences under therapy, are lacking.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pilot study on sleep quality changes including psoriasis and atopic dermatitis patients before and 2 weeks after intensive topical treatment. In addition to disease activity rating, patient-rated outcomes for itch severity and sleep quality and polygraphy was performed before and after topical therapy.

RESULTS

14 psoriasis, eleven atopic dermatitis patients (10 female, 15 male) with a mean age of 49 years were included. Disease activity scores (EASI and PASI) were significantly reduced with topical therapy after 2 weeks (p < 0.001). Pruritus intensity (NRS) showed a significant influence on deep sleep, which resolved after therapy. Insomnia severity significantly decreased (r > 0.50, p < 0.05) and daytime sleepiness showed a significant reduction in 40% of patients. N3 (deep sleep) and REM sleep significantly improved, showing a strong effect (r > 0.50). The apnea-hypopnea index decreased in one of four patients independent of the individual BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Through polygraphy, we demonstrated impaired sleep patterns in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis patients with itch as a relevant factor and beyond that, rapid sleep improvement under 2 weeks of topical treatment.

A Comprehensive Review of Evaluating Donor Site Morbidity and Scar Outcomes in Skin Transfer Techniques

This comprehensive review delves into the intricacies of donor site morbidity and scar outcomes in skin transfer techniques central to the field of reconstructive surgery. The review synthesizes existing literature to illuminate the multifaceted factors influencing outcomes by surveying a broad spectrum of grafting methods, from traditional autografts to cutting-edge tissue engineering approaches. Key findings underscore the complex interplay of graft characteristics, surgical techniques, and patient-specific variables. The implications for clinical practice advocate for a nuanced, patient-centered approach, incorporating emerging minimally invasive procedures and adjuvant therapies. The review concludes with recommendations for future research, emphasizing the importance of longitudinal studies, comparative analyses, patient-reported outcomes, advanced imaging techniques, and exploration of tissue engineering innovations. This synthesis advances our understanding of donor site morbidity and scar outcomes. It provides a roadmap for refining clinical protocols, ultimately enhancing the delicate balance between therapeutic efficacy and patient well-being in reconstructive surgery.

Do socioeconomic factors impact atopic dermatitis outcome? A single-center study

BACKGROUND

Race and socioeconomic status are thought to influence the severity of atopic dermatitis (AD), but findings differ between countries and measures used. The role of social determinants of health versus biologic factors in causing these differences is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that spatially-derived factors correlate with AD severity and patient-reported outcome (PRO) in a pediatric cohort from Chicago, USA.

METHODS

Children with AD and caregivers were enrolled from February 2018 to April 2019 in this single-site cross-sectional study. Severity was self- and physician-assessed using validated measures. Patient addresses were geocoded and linked to census tract IDs. Deprivation index (DI) was calculated using variables of the 2018 American Community Survey.

RESULTS

Among 216 children aged 5-17 years old, 111 (51.4%) lived in urban, 104 (48.1%) suburban, and one (0.5%) in rural areas. Race was self-classified as White in 31.0%, Black 24.5%, other or mixed 25.0%, and Asian 19.4%; 24.5% were Hispanic. Median DI was 0.32 (range 0.03-0.72), with higher scores indicating more deprivation. DI correlated with insurance type, family income, ethnicity, race, and parental education, and weakly with selected PRO T-scores. However, no correlations between any AD severity score and DI, race, ethnicity, income, education, or insurance type were found.

CONCLUSION

The impact of socioeconomic factors on AD severity in our study population was less pronounced than expected. This could be because of regional differences, including access to high-quality care. The role of access as a deciding factor in the impact of socioeconomic status on AD outcome deserves further investigation.

Measuring Atopic Eczema Control and Itch Intensity in Clinical Practice: A Consensus Statement From the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema in Clinical Practice (HOME-CP) Initiative

Importance

Measuring outcomes in clinical practice can aid patient care, quality improvement, and real-world evidence generation. The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) Clinical Practice initiative is developing a list of validated, feasible instruments to measure atopic eczema in clinical care. Prior work identified symptoms and long-term control as the most important domains to measure in clinical practice. The Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) and the Patient-Oriented Scoring Atopic Dermatitis Index (PO-SCORAD) were recommended by consensus to measure symptoms in clinical practice, but a need for instruments to measure itch intensity specifically was recognized. The HOME group also previously decided that long-term control should be captured by repeated measurements of eczema control. Recommended instruments to measure eczema control in clinical practice have not been defined.

Objective

To recommend instruments to measure eczema control and itch intensity in patients with atopic eczema in clinical practice.

Evidence Review

Available instruments to measure eczema control and itch intensity were identified through systematic reviews, informing a consensus process held at the HOME VIII virtual online meeting (October 6 and October 9, 2020). Feasibility aspects were highlighted to optimize instrument selection for the clinical practice. Consensus on an instrument was reached if fewer than 30% of the voters disagreed.

Findings

Of 7 identified instruments, the Recap of Atopic Eczema (RECAP) and Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) were the recommended instruments to measure eczema control (3 of 63 [5%] and 7 of 69 [10%] of voters disagreed, respectively). A single-question patient global assessment garnered support, but the current available instrument did not reach consensus. Six available itch-intensity instruments were identified. Of them, 3 instruments were recommended by consensus: a peak 24-hour numeric rating scale (NRS)-itch, and 1-week NRS-itch instruments from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Itch Questionnaire, measuring average and peak itch (11 of 63 [17%], 14 of 63 [22%], and 16 of 59 [27%] voters disagreed, respectively).

Conclusions and Relevance

Clinicians and patients are encouraged to incorporate these well-validated, quick-to-perform, and easy-to-use instruments into their clinic, selecting the instruments that best fit their need. These assessments are meant to enhance, not replace, the patient-clinician encounter, and to support real-world research and health care improvement.

Development, Psychometric Validation and Responder Definition of Worst Itch Scale in Children with Severe Atopic Dermatitis

INTRODUCTION

Itch associated with atopic dermatitis (AD) has a profoundly negative effect on patients of all ages. Therefore, itch is a main target for AD therapeutic approaches, and treatments are perceived as beneficial when they achieve an itch reduction. In the absence of a validated scale for children aged 6-11 years that is suitable for assessing itch intensity in clinical trial settings, the Worst Itch Scale was developed.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews, comprising concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing, were conducted to develop and evaluate the content validity of the Worst Itch Scale. Psychometric assessments used data from the LIBERTY AD PEDS phase 3 trial of dupilumab in patients aged 6-11 years with severe AD. These included test-retest reliability, construct validity, known-groups validity and responsiveness. Thresholds for clinically meaningful change were defined using anchor- and distribution-based methods.

RESULTS

The Worst Itch Scale consisted of two items asking about 'worst itching' experienced 'last night' and 'today'. Worst Itch Scale scores showed large, positive correlations with existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of itch, and weaker correlations with clinician-reported outcome (ClinRO) measures assessing objective signs of AD. Improvements in Worst Itch Scale scores were highly correlated with improvements in other itch PROs and moderately correlated with improvements in ClinROs. The responder definition based on the primary anchor, a 1-point improvement in the Patient Global Impression of Disease, was 2.84. Supportive anchors produced response estimates ranging from 2.43 to 4.80 points.

CONCLUSIONS

The Worst Itch Scale is a fit-for-purpose (e.g. well-defined, reliable, responsive and valid) scale for evaluating worst itch intensity in children aged 6-11 years with severe AD. The within-patient threshold for defining a clinically meaningful response was a ≥ 3-4-point change in the Worst Itch Scale score.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03345914. Video: How can we reliably assess itch intensity in children 6-11 years with severe atopic dermatitis in clinical trial settings?

Psychometric Considerations in Developing PROMIS® Measures for Early Childhood

OBJECTIVE

The early expression of lifespan health and disease states can often be detected in early childhood. Currently, the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) includes over 300 measures of health for individuals ages 5 years and older. We extended PROMIS to early childhood by creating developmentally appropriate, lifespan coherent parent-report measures for 1-5-year-olds. This paper describes the psychometric approaches used for these efforts.

METHODS

2 waves of data from parents of children ages 1-5 were collected via 2 internet panel companies. Wave 1 data (n = 1,400) were used to evaluate item pool unidimensionality, model fit, and initial item parameters. Combined data from wave 1 and wave 2 (reference sample; n = 1,057) were used to estimate final item parameters. Using item response theory methods, we developed and tested 12 item pools: Global Health, Physical Activity, Sleep Disturbance, Sleep-related Impairment, Anger/Irritability, Anxiety, Depressive Symptoms, Positive Affect, Self-Regulation, Engagement, Family Relationships, and Peer Relationships.

RESULTS

Wave 1 analyses supported the unidimensionality of Physical Activity, Positive Affect, Anger/Irritability, Anxiety, Depressive Symptoms, and Global Health. Family Relationships and Peer Relationships were combined to form "Social Relationships"; Sleep Disturbance and Sleep-related Impairment were combined to form "Sleep Problems." Self-Regulation was divided into "Flexibility" and "Frustration Tolerance"; Engagement was divided into "Curiosity" and "Persistence." Short forms were developed for item banks with more than 10 items; and.

CONCLUSIONS

Using rigorous mixed-methods, we successfully extended PROMIS to early childhood (1-5-year-olds). Measures are now publicly available in English and Spanish (www.healthmeasures.net).