Surgical and Reproductive Outcomes after Hysteroscopic Removal of Retained Products of Conception: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Application of narrow-band imaging combined with hysteroscopic 7Fr cold knife in the treatment of missed early miscarriage

PURPOSE

The application of narrow-band imaging for missed early miscarriage treatment remains unclear. This study determined the application advantages of NBI combined with hysteroscopic 7Fr cold knife embryo removal for treating missed early miscarriage.

METHODS

A retrospective selection of 208 patients who were hospitalized for missed early miscarriage at Hubei Provincial Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2023 to June 2023 were included. The patients were divided into three groups according to the treatment methods: Group A (medical abortion), Group B (NBI combined with hysteroscopic 7Fr cold knife), and Group C (ultrasound-guided vacuum aspiration). The clinical data of the three groups were analyzed, and endometrial recovery after treatment was compared to identify risk factors affecting complications after treatment for missed early miscarriage.

RESULTS

The endometrial thickness was greatest in Group A and thinnest in Group C two weeks post-treatment. Group B had the earliest menstrual recovery and the lowest intrauterine residual and intrauterine adhesion incidences. The pregnancy termination method was the only independent risk factor for intrauterine adhesions after treatment. The time to menstrual recovery after treatment, the serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin level at 2 weeks post-treatment, and the endometrial thickness had predictive value for intrauterine retention. The combined prediction of the above indicators showed high accuracy.

CONCLUSION

The use of NBI combined with hysteroscopic 7Fr cold knife embryo removal in patients with missed early miscarriage results in a lower risk of intrauterine residuals and IUA than ultrasound-guided vacuum aspiration and medical abortion. This approach leads to earlier menstrual recovery and protects the endometrium.

Hysteroscopic Treatment of Retained Products of Conception Using See and Treat Operative Office Hysteroscopy Without Anesthesia

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical efficacy of office operative hysteroscopic treatment of retained products of conception (RPOC) without anesthesia.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A tertiary care academic medical center between April 2019 to March 2023.

PATIENTS

A total of 175 patients with confirmed RPOC underwent see-and-treat operative office hysteroscopy without anesthesia in our outpatient clinic.

INTERVENTIONS

Hysteroscopic removal of RPOC without anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In 163 cases, the removal of RPOC in the office was attempted, and in 155 cases (95.1%), complete removal of the RPOC without complications was achieved, although it sometimes required a second procedure in clinic. In 12 cases, office operative hysteroscopy was not attempted due to physician decision based on the appearance and vascularity of RPOC, or due to pain during the diagnostic hysteroscopy, or both. The average size of RPOC for patients treated in the clinic was 15 ± 8.4 mm (range 4-47 mm). One hundred twenty-eight cases were performed using a Truclear Elite 6 mm device, and 35 cases using a mini-Bettocchi 4.2 mm device. Eighteen cases were unsuccessful on the first attempt; 12 underwent a second procedure in the clinic, which was completed in 10 (83.3%) cases. Of the patients, 105 (71.4%) patients attended a follow-up hysteroscopy, 8 of them (7.6%) required separation of adhesions that were performed in the clinic, and 8 patients were referred to a surgical procedure under anesthesia due to persistent RPOC.

CONCLUSION

Operative office hysteroscopy is feasible and highly effective for patients with RPOC, with a total success rate of 95.1% complete evacuation in clinic. A follow-up hysteroscopy is important, especially after treatment of large RPOC.

Embryoscopy and targeted embryo biopsy for the management of early abortion

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety, accuracy, and effectiveness of embryoscopy for the management of early abortion and to test the hypothesis that targeted embryo and chorionic villi sampling avoids maternal cell contamination (MCC) for genetic testing of products of conception (POC).

METHODS

This ambispective study included 74 consecutive patients presenting with early abortion. Gestations between 5 and 9 weeks, obtained either spontaneously or through assisted reproductive technologies were included. Embryoscopies were performed under transabdominal ultrasound guidance using a 5-mm hysteroscope and forceps and scissors for sampling and resection of the gestational sac. Primary outcomes were the feasibility of the technique, the diagnostic accuracy as measured by absence of maternal cell contamination and the complication rate. The secondary outcome was the comparison between array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) in a subgroup of 20 patients.

RESULTS

Seventy-four consecutive procedures were performed, with no cases of maternal contamination and no complications. In 60 patients, a follow-up sonohysterography was performed which showed a normal cavity. The remaining 14 patients had a normal transvaginal ultrasound 1 month after the embryoscopy. In the subgroup of 20 patients analyzed by both aCGH and NGS, we had one case of MCC with aCGH and none with NGS. Differences were found in the detection of mosaicism and triploidy.

CONCLUSION

Embryoscopy for uterine evacuation minimizes maternal contamination and post-operative complications. Safe and rapid embryoscopy furnishes prompt and reliable genetic analysis of POC that is of great importance in clinical management of early pregnancy failure.

The HYsteroscopic Miscarriage MaNagement (HYMMN) pilot randomized-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of performing a full-scale, adequately powered, multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing the effectiveness of office hysteroscopy (OH) for the treatment of retained pregnancy tissue (RPT) after miscarriage, compared with standard treatment (ST) (expectant/medical/surgical), on future pregnancy outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center pilot RCT performed at Birmingham Women's Hospital, UK. Patients opting for non-surgical miscarriage management at ≤14 weeks gestation who wanted to conceive as soon as possible were recruited and offered a transvaginal ultrasound scan (TVUS) eight weeks later to check for the presence of RPT. Patients with RPT were randomized in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated online random allocation sequence to either OH (performed using the TruClear 5.0 hysteroscopic tissue retrieval system) or ST (the type of which was recommended based on symptoms, urinary pregnancy test and scan findings).

RESULTS

158 participants were approached for inclusion into the trial, of which 149 (94.3%) agreed. Of the 126 that underwent TVUS, RPT were diagnosed in 42 patients (33.3%). 21 patients were randomized to OH, of whom 18 underwent the procedure because three fell pregnant after their TVUS. OH was deemed acceptable to all patients without any serious complications. 21 patients were randomized to ST where 16 patients (76%) were recommended expectant management and five (24%) were recommended surgical management. 115 patients (91%) were able to provide pregnancy data, however, the study was not powered to show a clinically significant difference.

CONCLUSION

A full-scale, adequately powered, randomized clinical trial investigating OH against ST for the treatment of RPT following miscarriage is clinically relevant and feasible owing to high rates of participation, acceptability and satisfaction and low rates of attrition associated with the proposed interventions.

Incidence and risks of excessive distension absorption in hysteroscopic surgery using 5% mannitol solution: a retrospective descriptive study

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the incidence of excessive distension absorption in hysteroscopic surgery using 5% mannitol solution, evaluate the associated risks, and help to establish a safe fluid deficit threshold for such complication.

DESIGN

Retrospective descriptive study.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Ten thousand six hundred ninety-three patients underwent inpatient hysteroscopic surgery with 5% mannitol perfusion using a monopolar electrosurgical instrument from Jan. 2015 to Sep. 2020.

INTERVENTION(S)

None. This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A fluid deficit of more than 1000 mL was defined as the diagnostic criteria for excessive distension absorption. The overall incidence of excessive distension absorption in this study was 0.46% (49/10693). The incidence was 2.57% (16/623) for transcervical resection of fibroid (TCRF), 2.36% (9/381) for retained products of conception (RPOC) removal, 1.20% (6/501) for hysteroscopic uterine septum resection (HSR), 0.48% (4/828) for transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE), and 0.53% (14/2621) for transcervical resections of adhesion (TCRA). Excessive distension absorption could occur within seven minutes in HSR. Among the patients diagnosed with excessive distension absorption, 30.77% (12/39) exhibited signs or symptoms related to circulation overload with a fluid deficit under 2500 mL, and 10.26% (4/39) developed pulmonary edema.

CONCLUSION

Excessive distension absorption could happen in all kinds hysteroscopic surgical treatment including RPOC removal and TCRA which were rarely reported. The overall incidence of excessive distension absorption could be low. But it would be five times higher in certain procedures such as TCRF, RPOC removal and TCRA. Resection using a needle electrode in HSR and TCRA may contribute to the short time development of excessive distension absorption. 30.77% of the patients could not tolerate the fluid deficit of less than 2500 mL which was set as a threshold for isotonic distending media and presented with circulation overload related signs or symptoms.

Hysteroscopy: where did we start, and where are we now? The compelling story of what many considered the "Cinderella" of gynecological endoscopy

Hysteroscopy has truly revolutionized the field of diagnostic and operative gynecology. It is presently regarded as the gold standard method for both the diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine diseases and it has fundamentally altered the way gynecologists treat patients with such conditions. These pathologies can now be diagnosed and treated in an outpatient setting, thanks to technological advancements and instrument downsizing. Two hundred years of development and notable innovation are now reflected in the present hysteroscopic practice. This review attempts to trace the boundaries-pushing history of hysteroscopy by highlighting the advancements in technology and the therapeutic and diagnostic benefits offered by this groundbreaking approach.

Emergent Hysteroscopic Removal of Retained Products of Conception Following Laparoscopic Temporary Uterine Artery Ligation

Here, we describe two cases of retained products of conception (RPOC) that were successfully managed with hysteroscopic resection after laparoscopic temporary uterine artery ligation. Both patients were diagnosed with RPOC after early miscarriages. Case 1 was urgently admitted due to massive bleeding and underwent surgery following a blood transfusion. After laparoscopic temporary bilateral uterine artery ligation, the mass was hysteroscopically removed, and the ligation was subsequently released. The patient subsequently achieved an ongoing pregnancy. Case 2 underwent semi-emergency surgery due to intermittent bleeding. Initially, hysteroscopic surgery was planned. However, bleeding resulted in poor visualization of the operative field, and laparoscopic surgery was performed. In many previous reports of RPOC with heavy bleeding, uterine artery embolization was performed. However, there are concerns regarding the effect of a long-term reduction in uterine blood flow on fertility. Our method is not expected to decrease fertility because the ischemic effect is very short.

Emergency and prophylactic uterine artery embolization in gynecology and obstetrics - a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of emergency and prophylactic uterine artery embolization (UAE) in our clinical practice, including technical success, clinical success, and associated complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we analyzed 64 women who underwent emergency (n =18) and prophylactic (n = 46) UAE. Indications for emergency UAE included postpartum hemorrhage or severe hemorrhage during pregnancy termination, while prophylactic UAE was performed prior to surgical removal of retained products of conception (RPOC), delivery with abnormal placental implantation, or pregnancy termination (cervical pregnancy or fetal anomalies accompanied by abnormal placental implantation). Technical success of UAE was defined as complete exclusion of the vascular lesion and contrast stasis on the final angiogram, while clinical success was defined as cessation of bleeding after UAE Termination without a hysterectomy.

RESULTS

The overall clinical success of UAE in our study was 97% (62/64). All embolization procedures were technically and clinically successful in the prophylactic group without life-threatening hemorrhages or hysterectomies (100% success rate, 46/46). However, while 100% technical success was similarly attained in the emergency group, bleeding was successfully controlled in 89% of cases (16/18). In two patients with significant blood loss (over 2000 mL), embolization failed to achieve hemostasis, resulting in persistent bleeding and subsequent hysterectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

UAE is a safe and effective procedure for managing primary postpartum hemorrhage or severe hemorrhage during pregnancy termination and for decreasing the risk of severe hemorrhage during surgical removal of RPOC, delivery with abnormal placental implantation, or pregnancy.

Reproductive and obstetrical outcomes after treatment of retained products of conception: hysteroscopic removal vs ultrasound-guided electric vacuum aspiration, a prospective follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, curettage has been the most widely performed surgical intervention for removing retained products of conception. However, hysteroscopic removal is increasingly performed as an alternative because of the potentially lower risk of intrauterine adhesions and higher rates of complete removal. Until recently, studies comparing curettage with hysteroscopic removal regarding reproductive and obstetrical outcomes were limited, and data conflicting.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess reproductive and obstetrical outcomes in women wishing to conceive after removal of retained products of conception by hysteroscopy or ultrasound-guided electric vacuum aspiration.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective long-term follow-up study, conducted in 3 teaching hospitals and 1 university hospital. Patients were included from April 2015 until June 2022 for follow-up, either in a randomized controlled, nonblinded trial on the risk of intrauterine adhesions after removal of retained products of conception, or in a cohort alongside the randomized trial. Women with an ultrasonographic image suggestive of retained products of conception ranging from 1 to 4 cm were eligible. Surgical procedures in the randomized controlled trial were hysteroscopic morcellation or ultrasound-guided electric vacuum aspiration. In the cohort study, hysteroscopic treatment included hysteroscopic morcellation or cold loop resection compared with ultrasound-guided electric vacuum aspiration.

RESULTS

A total of 261 out of 305 patients (85.6%) were available for follow-up after removal of retained products of conception, resulting in a cohort of 171 women after hysteroscopic removal and 90 women after removal by ultrasound-guided vacuum aspiration. Respectively, 92 of 171 women (53.8%) in the hysteroscopic removal group and 56 of 90 (62.2%) in the electric vacuum aspiration group wished to conceive (P=.192). Subsequent pregnancy rates were 88 of 91 (96.7%) after hysteroscopic removal and 52 of 56 (92.9%) after electric vacuum aspiration (P=.428). The live birth rates were 61 of 80 (76.3%) and 37 of 48 (77.1%) after hysteroscopic removal and electric vacuum aspiration, respectively (P=.914), with 8 of 88 pregnancies (9.1%) in the hysteroscopic removal group and 4 of 52 (7.7%) in the electric vacuum aspiration group still ongoing at follow-up (P=1.00). The median time to conception was 8.2 weeks (interquartile range, 5.0-17.2) in the hysteroscopic removal group and 6.9 weeks (interquartile range, 5.0-12.1) in the electric vacuum aspiration group (P=.262). The overall placental complication rate was 13 of 80 (16.3%) in the hysteroscopic removal group and 11 of 48 (22.9%) in the electric vacuum aspiration group (P=.350).

CONCLUSION

Hysteroscopic removal and ultrasound-guided electric vacuum aspiration of retained products of conception seem to have no significantly different effects on subsequent live birth rate, pregnancy rate, time to conception, or pregnancy complications. Reproductive and obstetrical outcomes after removal of retained products of conception are reassuring, albeit with a high risk of placental complications.

Fertility and anatomical outcomes following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: An 11-year retrospective cohort study to validate a new classification system for intrauterine adhesions (Urman-Vitale Classification System)

OBJECTIVE

To propose a new classification system (Urman-Vitale Classification System) for intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) and to evaluate anatomical and fertility outcomes after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis accordingly.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients treated over 11 years by a single operator in a tertiary care hospital. Women with sonographic suspicion of IUAs were scheduled for hysterosalpingography (HSG) and hysteroscopy for confirmation and treatment. IUAs were divided into five classes according to symptoms, ultrasound, HSG findings, and postsurgical hysteroscopic appearance. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis was performed using a bipolar cutting electrode in an office setting. Evaluated outcomes were restoration of the uterine cavity, clinical pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and live birth rates.

RESULTS

A total of 227 patients (479 procedures) were included. Mean number of hysteroscopies increased in frequency with class of adhesions from Class 1 to Class 5 (1.0 ± 0.2 vs 2.3 ± 0.5; P = 0.001). Full restoration of the cavity was achieved in 100% of patients with Class 1 compared with 18.5% for Class 5 (43/43 vs 5/27; P = 0.001). Clinical pregnancy (Class 1 vs Class 4: P = 0.034; 1 vs 5: P = 0.006; 2 vs 5: P = 0.024) and live birth (Class 1 vs Class 4: P = 0.001; 1 vs 5: P = 0.006; 2 vs 4: P = 0.007; 2 vs 5: P = 0.0208) rates decreased with increasing severity of IUAs. Pregnancy loss rate was related to IUA severity (Class 1 vs Class 4: P = 0.012; 1 vs 5: P = 0.003: 2 vs 4: P = 0.014; 2 vs 5: P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

A classification based on symptoms, imaging findings, and postsurgical macroscopic appearance of the uterine cavity could be useful in predicting prognosis and fertility in women with IUAs.

Hysteroscopy-assisted suction curettage for early pregnancy loss: does it reduce retained products of conception and postoperative intrauterine adhesions?

OBJECTIVE

To describe the feasibility of hysteroscopy-assisted suction curettage for early pregnancy loss and to investigate whether it reduces the rates of retained products of conception (RPOC) and intrauterine adhesions (IUA).

DESIGN

Prospective single-arm cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

PATIENTS

Women admitted for surgical evacuation of early pregnancy loss were invited to participate in the study.

INTERVENTION

Vaginal misoprostol was administered for cervical ripening preoperatively. Under general anesthesia, a diagnostic hysteroscopy was performed to identify the pregnancy's implantation wall, followed by ultrasound-guided suction and curettage directed to the implantation wall, and then diagnostic hysteroscopy to verify complete uterine cavity emptying. Postoperative IUA were evaluated by follow-up office hysteroscopy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Identification of the pregnancy's implantation wall on hysteroscopy, and intra-, and postoperative complications associated with the procedure. The evaluation of postoperative IUA was limited due to the COVID-19 pandemic-related restrictions on elective procedures.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included in the study group. Their mean age was 34.0 ± 6.6 years, and their mean gestational age was 8.9 ± 1.6 weeks. The implantation wall was clearly visualized on hysteroscopy in 33 out of 40 cases (82.5%). The mean operative time was 17.2 ± 8.8 min, and no intraoperative complications occurred. Suspected RPOC were diagnosed intraoperatively by hysteroscopy and removed in 4 cases, and the histologic examination confirmed the presence of RPOC in three of them. Follow-up office hysteroscopy was performed in nine women: mild IUA was diagnosed in one case and a normal cavity was confirmed in eight cases. A new pregnancy was reported at the time of follow-up in 15 cases, while 12 women declined to attend the follow-up hysteroscopy and four were lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Hysteroscopy-assisted suction curettage for early pregnancy loss is a safe, short, and inexpensive procedure, which allows the identification of the pregnancy's wall in most cases and may reduce the rates of RPOC.

Diode laser use in hysteroscopic surgery: current status and future perspectives

Recent advances in surgical technology and innovative techniques have revolutionized surgical gynecology, including transcervical hysteroscopic procedures. Surgical lasers (Nd-Yag, Argon, diode, and CO2 lasers) have been promoted to remove a variety of gynecological pathologies. For hysteroscopic surgery, the diode laser represents the most versatile and feasible innovation, with simultaneous cut and coagulate action, providing improved hemostasis compared with CO2 laser. The newest diode laser devices exhibit increased power and a dual wavelength, to work precisely with reduced thermal dispersion and minimal damage to surrounding tissues. Their efficacy and safety have been validated both in the hospitals as well as in the office setting. Updated evidence reports that several hysteroscopic procedures, including endometrial polypectomies, myomectomies and metroplasties can be successfully performed with a diode laser. Therefore, this review aimed to give a deeper understanding of the role of laser energy in gynecology and subsequently in hysteroscopy in order to safely incorporate this technology into clinical practice.

Office intrauterine morcellation for retained products of conception

OBJECTIVE

Proposing hysteroscopic morcellation (HM) as a surgical-therapeutic approach in the treatment of retained products of conception (RPOC) to prevent intrauterine adhesions (IUAs).

DESIGN

Prospective analysis.

SETTING

A teaching and university hospital.

PATIENTS

Women with RPOC.

INTERVENTIONS

Office -HM with 'Truclear 5 C'.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-two consecutive patients presenting with trophoblastic residue retention after miscarriage and interruption of pregnancy or placenta remnants after cesarean section or delivery were enrolled. These women underwent office-HM with 'Truclear 5 C'. Primary outcomes were median time and rate of hospitalization. The quality of the specimen was also analyzed. A hysteroscopic second look for IUAs was performed.

RESULTS

Mean procedure time was six minutes (SD ± 5). Tissue samples had a mean collection size 2.5 cm3+0.9. 38% of the samples had spotting or abnormal vaginal discharge. Dilatation of the cervical canal was not performed in any case. Second-look hysteroscopy did not show any de novo IUAs in any of the enrolled patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the hysteroscopic treatment of RPOC, HM is a valid choice in an office setting without the use of cervical dilatation. Removal of RPOC was uneventful in all cases, simple and carried out faster without any adverse outcomes.

Outpatient hysteroscopic removal of retained products of conception: evaluation of effectiveness, safety and patient satisfaction

OBJECTIVE

To assess effectiveness, safety and patient satisfaction of hysteroscopic removal of retained products of conception using a tissue removal system in the outpatient setting.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective observational study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital over a 10-month period. Fifty-two women who underwent an outpatient hysteroscopy for removal of retained products of conception were included. Effectiveness was evaluated as complete removal of retained products of conception in a one-time procedure. Safety was determined based on the rate of complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Patient satisfaction and pain were assessed using a visual analogue scale survey completed by patients after the procedure.

RESULTS

Complete removal of retained products of conception in a one-time procedure was achieved in 98.1% of cases. The mean morcellation time was 6.0 min. The complication rate recorded in this study was 9.6%; most complications were mild, but there was one case of uterine perforation. A global satisfaction ratio of 8.9 out of 10 was reported by patients. The study did not find any significant differences in complete removal of retained products of conception based on type of hysteroscope, presence of symptoms or Gutenberg classification. Although not significant, a linear relationship was observed between a higher volume of retained products of conception and a higher Gutenberg classification (p=0.229).

CONCLUSION

Outpatient management of retained products of conception using a tissue removal system is effective and safe, and has a high level of patient satisfaction. The results of this study have the potential to alter the standard approach to the management of retained products of conception.

Comparative analysis of the clinical efficacy and reproductive outcomes of the hysteroscopic tissue removal system (MyoSure) and hysteroscopic electroresection in the treatment of benign intrauterine lesions

OBJECTIVE

To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy and reproductive outcomes of the hysteroscopic tissue removal system (MyoSure) and hysteroscopic electroresection in the treatment of benign intrauterine lesions in women of reproductive age.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients with benign intrauterine lesions treated with MyoSure or hysteroscopic electroresection. The primary outcomes were operative time and resection completeness, and reproductive outcomes were followed up and compared. Secondary outcomes included perioperative adverse events and postoperative adhesions seen during second-look hysteroscopy. Data analysis was performed using χ2 and Fisher tests for qualitative variables and Student t-test for quantitative variables.

RESULTS

The operative times of patients with type 0 or I myoma, endometrial polyps, or retained products of conception in the MyoSure group were shorter than those in the electroresection group but were not significantly different for patients with type II myomas. The complete resection rate was lower in the MyoSure group than in the electroresection group. The degree of decrease in the American Fertility Society score of intrauterine adhesion in the MyoSure group was significantly higher (2.90 ± 1.29 points vs 1.31 ± 0.89 points, P = 0.025). The time to pregnancy and the pregnancy rate were higher in the MyoSure group (13.14 ± 7.85 months vs 16.26 ± 8.22 months, P = 0.040; 65.12% vs 54.55%, P = 0.045), but there was no significant difference in the term live birth rate, premature birth rate, or abortion rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

MyoSure has advantages of a shortened operative time and improvement in reproductive outcomes such as pregnancy rate. However, for type II myomas, MyoSure has limitations, and a comprehensive evaluation before the procedure is required.

Risk factors for intrauterine device embedment in postmenopausal women: an analysis of 731 participants undergoing hysteroscopy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the risk factors for intrauterine device (IUD) embedment in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

A total of 731 women who underwent hysteroscopy for IUD removal from January 2019 to December 2021 were included in the trial, of whom 301 were diagnosed with IUD embedment (embedded group) and 430 had a normal IUD location (control group). The following data were collected from electronic medical records: demographic traits, ultrasound findings, IUD shapes, uterine features, and hysteroscopy findings. Bivariate contingency analysis and multiple logistic regression were performed to identify the significant independent variables that affect IUD embedment.

RESULTS

Prior IUD removal failure (14.3% vs 5.1%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.29; 95% CI, 1.90-5.71) and V-shaped IUD (18.9% vs 10.7%; aOR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.33-3.16) were risk factors that were independently linked with IUD embedment. Uterine volume (22.7 [20.9-24.5] cm 3 vs 27.9 [24.8-30.9] cm 3 ; aOR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.982-0.999) was negatively linked with IUD embedment. There were no differences in age, parity, menopause length, years with an IUD in situ, uterine position, or abortion times between the two groups. There were no differences in existing leiomyoma, prior cervical LEEP (loop electrosurgical excision procedure), or myomectomy between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior IUD removal failure, V-shaped IUD, and a smaller uterine volume were risk factors for IUD embedment in menopausal women.

Zishen yutai pill as an adjuvant therapy in threatened Miscarriage:A meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Zishen Yutai Pill combined with western medicine for the treatment of women with threatened miscarriage during the first trimester of pregnancy.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials published before the end of Apr 1, 2023 on Zishen Yutai Pill and threatened miscarriage were systematically retrieved from China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, Sinomed, VIP, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The international clinical trial registration platform and the Chinese clinical trial registration platform of clinical trials was searched from their inception until Apr 1, 2023. Meta analysis of random effect model was used to combine the research data. Chi-squared test and I² statistics were used for heterogeneity test.

Results

Twenty-three trials (enrolling 2411 participants) were included in the review. Zishen Yutai pill combined with western medicine therapy showed significant improvement on human chorionic gonadotropin [MD 19.33 IU/ml, 95% CI (15.84, 22.81)], the total effective rate [RR 1.19, 95% CI (1.15-1.23)], progesterone [MD 7.14 ng/ml, 95% CI (6.14, 8.13)], estradiol [MD 33.69 pg/ml, 95% CI (27.42, 39.96)], duration of abdominal pain [MD -2.36 d, 95% CI (- 3.54, - 1.18)], duration of vaginal bleeding [MD -1.94 d, 95% CI (- 2.93, - 0.94)], and fibrinogen [MD -0.34 g/L, 95% CI (- 0.57, - 0.11)]. There was no significant difference in hematocrit [MD 0.68%, 95% CI (- 0.08, 1.44)] between the experimental and the control group. Zishen Yutai Pill may improve the clinical symptoms in women with threatened miscarriage, such as human chorionic gonadotropin the total effective rate, progesterone, estradiol, duration of abdominal pain, duration of vaginal bleeding, and fibrinogen. Especially for progesterone, the effect of treatment ≦2 weeks is significantly better than treatment of >2 weeks. For estradiol, the effect of treatment >2 weeks is significantly better than treatment of ≦ 2 weeks.

Conclusion

Zishen Yutai Pill, as a complementary therapy, significantly improved human chorionic gonadotropin, the total effective rate, progesterone, estradiol, abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, and fibrinogen in patients with threatened miscarriage in first-trimester pregnancy. However, the systematic review has some limitations, such as degraded information quality, no blinding of patients or doctors, etc. Due to the small sample size and low quality of research, it needs to be further confirmed by large sample and high-quality randomized controlled trials, such as blinding of patients, doctors and outcome assessment should be complemented, clinical follow-up, live birth rate, fetal growth should be supplemented.

Systematic review registration

INPLASY202320039.

Operative Hysteroscopy vs Vacuum Aspiration for Incomplete Spontaneous Abortion: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Vacuum aspiration is commonly used to remove retained products of conception in patients with incomplete spontaneous abortion. Scarring of the uterine cavity may occur, potentially impairing future fertility. A procedural alternative, operative hysteroscopy, has gained popularity with a presumption of better future fertility.

Objective

To assess the superiority of hysteroscopy to vacuum aspiration for subsequent pregnancy in patients with incomplete spontaneous abortion who intend to have future pregnancy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The HY-PER randomized, controlled, single-blind trial included 574 patients between November 6, 2014, and May 3, 2017, with a 2-year duration of follow-up. This multicenter trial recruited patients in 15 French hospitals. Individuals aged 18 to 44 years and planned for surgery for an incomplete spontaneous abortion with plans to subsequently conceive were randomized in a 1:1 ratio.

Interventions

Surgical treatment by hysteroscopy (n = 288) or vacuum aspiration (n = 286).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was a pregnancy of at least 22 weeks' duration during 2-year follow-up.

Results

The intention-to-treat analyses included 563 women (mean [SD] age, 32.6 [5.4] years). All aspiration procedures were completed. The hysteroscopic procedure could not be completed for 19 patients (7%), 18 of which were converted to vacuum aspiration (8 with inability to completely resect, 7 with insufficient visualization, 2 with anesthetic complications that required a shortened procedure, 1 with equipment failure). One hysteroscopy failed due to a false passage during cervical dilatation. During the 2-year follow-up, 177 patients (62.8%) in the hysteroscopy group and 190 (67.6%) in the vacuum aspiration (control) group achieved the primary outcome (difference, -4.8% [95% CI, -13% to 3.0%]; P = .23). The time-to-event analyses showed no statistically significant difference between groups for the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.71 to 1.07]). Duration of surgery and hospitalization were significantly longer for hysteroscopy. Rates of new miscarriages, ectopic pregnancies, Clavien-Dindo surgical complications of grade 3 or above (requiring surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention or life-threatening event or death), and reinterventions to remove remaining products of conception did not differ between groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

Surgical management by hysteroscopy of incomplete spontaneous abortions in patients intending to conceive again was not associated with more subsequent births or a better safety profile than vacuum aspiration. Moreover, operative hysteroscopy was not feasible in all cases.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02201732.

Surgical management of endocervical and decidual polyps during pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of endocervical and decidual polypectomy on obstetrical outcomes of pregnant women.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scielo, EMBASE, Cochrane Library at the CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, and LILACS were searched from inception to April 2021. No language or geographical restrictions were applied. Inclusion criteria regarded observational studies concerning pregnant women with a cervical lesion who underwent cervical polypectomy. Co-primary outcomes were incidence of late pregnancy loss and preterm birth in women with endocervical or decidual polypectomy as well as polypectomy versus expectant management. Random effect meta-analyses to calculate risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were performed. Quality assessment of included papers was performed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale criteria.

RESULTS

Three studies, with data provided for 3097 women, were included in quantitative analysis, with comparisons between endocervical and decidual polyps extracted from two studies and 156 patients. After a first trimester endocervical or decidual polypectomy, no significant differences were found for late pregnancy losses (RR 0.29 [95% CI 0.05, 1.80], I2 = 11%). Risk for preterm birth was significantly higher for decidual polyps' removal (RR 6.13 [95% CI 2.57, 14.59], I2 = 0%). One paper compared cervical polypectomy vs expectant management, with increased incidence of late pregnancy loss (4/142 vs 5/2799; p < 0.001) and preterm birth (19/142 vs 115/2799; p < 0.001) in women subjected to polypectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence regarding the removal of cervical polyps in pregnancy is extremely limited. However, the removal of either decidual or endocervical polyps seems associated with increased risk of pregnancy loss and preterm birth, with increased preterm birth risk following endocervical rather than decidual polypectomy.

Hysteroscopy for retained products of conception: a single-institution experience

BACKGROUND

Retained products of conception can occur with induced abortion during early-term pregnancy, induction of labor during mid-term pregnancy, drug-induced abortion, miscarriage, cesarean delivery, or full-term normal delivery. Compared with traditional dilation and curettage, hysteroscopy is a safer and more effective treatment method for retained products of conception. This study aimed to report the efficacy of hysteroscopy for treating retained products of conception and to share our new clinical perspectives.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Chengdu, China. We included 36 patients with retained products of conception who underwent hysteroscopy at our hospital.

RESULTS

Our study reported a complete removal rate of 80.5% (29/36) with one procedure. The normal menstruation recovery rate during 1 year of follow-up was 91.6% (33/36). A low rate of postoperative intrauterine adhesions (2.8% [1/36]) was also reported.

CONCLUSION

Our retrospective study elucidated the use of hysteroscopy for retained products of conception. We also shared new perspectives regarding hysteroscopy and optimal surgical methods for treating retained products of conception as well as our experience treating residual products with hysteroscopy. To our knowledge, no other study has shared similar experiences.

Conservative Management for Retained Products of Conception in Late Pregnancy

This retrospective study aims to compare the early manual removal of placenta (MROP) and conservative management of retained products of conception (RPOC) after 34 weeks of gestation. Nineteen cases underwent MROP within 24 h of delivery, of which nine patients had no symptoms requiring emergent treatment. These 9 patients (group M) were compared with 22 patients who were treated conservatively (group C). Massive bleeding was observed in 5 (56%) patients in group M and 11 (50%) patients in group C, with no significant difference in frequency. However, the lowest hemoglobin level within 72 h after massive bleeding was lower in group M (median: 6.7 vs. 7.7 g/dL, p = 0.029), suggesting that massive bleeding occurred in a short period of time. On the other hand, a retained placenta was observed in four patients in group M after the MROP; however, the placenta disappeared more quickly than in group C (median; 1.0 vs. 99.0 days, p = 0.009). In group C, all bleeding and infection occurred within 60 days of delivery, including heavy bleeding in six cases during the placental-extraction trial. Human chorionic gonadotropin in group C fell below the measurable threshold at a median of 67 days postpartum. In conclusion, for RPOC without urgent symptoms, early MROP and conservative treatment have their advantages and disadvantages. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine which of those treatments is superior.

Risk of endometrial cancer in asymptomatic postmenopausal women in relation to ultrasonographic endometrial thickness: systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the risk of endometrial carcinoma and atypical endometrial hyperplasia in asymptomatic postmenopausal women concerning the endometrial thickness measured by stratified threshold categories used for performing subsequent endometrial sampling and histologic evaluation.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, SciELO, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, LILACS, conference proceedings, and international controlled trials registries were searched without temporal, geographic, or language restrictions.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies were selected if they had a crossover design evaluating the risk of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma in postmenopausal asymptomatic women and calculated the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography thresholds (at least 3.0 mm) confirmed by histopathologic diagnosis.

METHODS

This was a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy and Synthesizing Evidence from Diagnostic Accuracy Tests guidelines. Endometrial thickness thresholds were grouped as follows: from 3.0 to 5.9 mm; between 6.0 and 9.9 mm; between 10.0 and 13.9 mm; and ≥14.0 mm. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Publication bias was quantified using the Deek funnel plot test. Coprimary outcomes were the risk of atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial carcinoma according to the endometrial thickness and diagnostic accuracy of each threshold group.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies provided the data of 10,334 women who were all included in the final analysis. Overall, at an endometrial thickness threshold of at least 3.0 mm, the risk of atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial carcinoma was increased 3-fold relative to women below the cutoff (relative risk, 3.77; 95% confidence interval, 2.26-6.32; I2=74%). Similar degrees of risk were reported for thresholds between 3.0 and 5.9 mm (relative risk, 5.08; 95% confidence interval, 2.26-11.41; I2=0%), 6.0 and 9.9 mm (relative risk, 4.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-11.23; I2=0%), 10.0 and 13.9 mm (relative risk, 4.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-10.87; I2=86%), and ≥14.0 mm (relative risk, 2.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-6.16; I2=78%) with no significant difference among subgroups (P=.885). Regarding diagnostic accuracy, the pooled sensitivity decreased from thresholds below 5.9 mm (relative risk, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.85) to above 14.0 mm (relative risk, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.40). Furthermore, the specificity increased from 0.70 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.78) for endometrial thickness between 3.0 and 5.9 mm to 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.94) when the endometrial thickness is ≥14.0 mm. For 3.0 to 5.9 mm and 10.0 to 13.9 mm thresholds, the highest diagnostic odds ratios of 10 (95% confidence interval, 3-41) and 11 (95% confidence interval, 2-49), with areas under the curve of 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.84) and 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.86), respectively, were retrieved. The summary point analysis revealed that the 3.0 to 5.9 mm cutoff point was placed higher in the summary receiver operator curve space than the other subgroups, indicating increased endometrial carcinoma or atypical endometrial hyperplasia diagnosis using these cutoffs.

CONCLUSION

Both low and high endometrial thickness thresholds in postmenopausal asymptomatic women seem equally effective in detecting endometrial carcinoma and atypical endometrial hyperplasia. However, although using a 3.0 to 5.9 mm cutoff results in a lower specificity, the offsetting improvement in sensitivity may justify using this cutoff for further endometrial evaluation in patients with suspected endometrial malignancy.

Does Hysteroscopic Dissection of Partial Uterine Septum Represent a Risk Factor for Placental Abnormalities in Subsequent Pregnancy Compared with Controls Undergoing Other Hysteroscopic Surgery? Results from a Large Case-Control Analysis

BACKGROUND

Hysteroscopic septum dissection (HSD) is thought to improve fertility and pregnancy outcomes. However, the available literature suggests that uterine surgery can cause placental abnormalities in subsequent pregnancies.

METHODS

A case-control study was performed at the University Medical Center of Ljubljana, Department of Human Reproduction, from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018. The primary outcome was the association between HSD and the occurrence of placental abnormalities. We included women who underwent HSD due to infertility. Age-matched women who underwent hysteroscopic surgery for other issues were considered as controls. In addition, we divided the groups according to conception method. Only singleton pregnancies and first delivery were considered.

RESULTS

A total of 1286 women (746 who underwent HSD and 540 controls) were included in the analysis. HSD had no influence on placental abnormalities since the ratio was comparable regardless of the method of conception (113/746 vs. 69/540; p = 0.515). Infertile women who conceived naturally after HSD had a normal placentation rate comparable to women who did not undergo HSD (380/427 vs. 280/312; p = 0.2104). The rate of placental abnormalities in women who achieved pregnancy with IVF/ICSI procedures following HSD was comparable to that of women who did not undergo HSD (52/319 vs. 33/228; p = 0.5478). Placenta previa occurred significantly more often in infertile women without HSD after IVF/ICSI compared to natural conception (2/312 vs. 7/228; p = 0.0401).

CONCLUSIONS

HSD was not associated with higher rate of placental abnormalities in the first singleton pregnancy compared with other hysteroscopic procedures. A higher rate of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ICSI procedures, which was shown by our research, is corroborated by previous research findings.

Quality of Life, Anxiety and Depression in Women Treated with Hysteroscopic Endometrial Resection or Ablation for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background and Objectives: Hysteroscopic endometrial resection (ER) or global endometrial ablation (GEA) are feasible methods to treat heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to assess patient's quality of life (QoL) in women treated with ER/GEA compared to hysterectomy. Materials and Methods: Electronic searches in MEDLINE Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, PROSPERO and Cochrane CENTRAL were conducted from their inception to July 2022. Inclusion criteria were RCTs of premenopausal women with HMB randomized to conservative surgical treatment (ER/GEA) or hysterectomy. The primary outcome was the evaluation of QoL using the SF-36 score. Results: Twelve RCTs (2773 women) were included in the analysis. Women treated with hysteroscopic ER/GEA showed significantly lower scores for the SF-36 general health perception (mean difference (MD) -8.56 [95% CI -11.75 to -5.36]; I2 = 0%), social function (MD -12.90 [95% CI -23.90 to -1.68]; I2 = 91%), emotional role limitation (MD -4.64 [95% CI -8.43 to -0.85]; I2 = 0%) and vitality (MD -8.01 [95% CI -14.73 to -1.30]; I2 = 74%) domains relative to hysterectomy. Anxiety, depression scores and complication rates were similar between treatments. Relative to uterine balloon therapy, amenorrhea was more common with EA/GER (relative risk 1.51 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.20] I2 = 28%), but posttreatment satisfaction was similar. Conclusions: Women's perception of QoL might be seen to be less improved after hysteroscopic ER/GEA rather than hysterectomy. However, such findings need to be confirmed by additional trials due to the high number of outdated studies and recent improvements in hysteroscopic instrumentation and techniques.

Role of noncoding RNA in the pathophysiology and treatment of intrauterine adhesion

Intrauterine adhesion (IUA) is one of the most common diseases of the reproductive system in women. It is often accompanied by serious clinical problems that damage reproductive function, such as menstrual disorder, infertility, or recurrent abortion. The clinical effect of routine treatment is not ideal, and the postoperative recurrence rate is still very high. Therefore, exploring the pathological mechanism of IUA and finding new strategies for the effective prevention and treatment of IUA are needed. The main pathological mechanism of IUA is endometrial fibrosis and scar formation. Noncoding RNA (ncRNA) plays an important role in the fibrosis process, which is one of the latest research advances in the pathophysiology of IUA. Moreover, the exosomal miRNAs derived from mesenchymal stem cells can be used to improve IUA. This paper reviewed the role of ncRNAs in IUA pathogenesis, summarized the core pathways of endometrial fibrosis regulated by ncRNAs, and finally introduced the potential of ncRNAs as a therapeutic target.

Hysteroembryoscopy and hysteroscopic uterine evacuation of early pregnancy loss: A feasible procedure in selected cases

Hysteroscopic uterine evacuation of early pregnancy loss using tissue removal devices seems to be a safe and feasible procedure in selected cases. The hysteroscopic approach allows the precise localisation of the gestational sac inside the uterine cavity. The endoscopic approach allows one to perform hysteroembryoscopy before uterine evacuation and this technique appears to be more accurate than dilatation & curettage for fetal chromosome karyotyping, with lower maternal cell contamination. This “under vision” procedure may reduce retained products of conception rates and risk of intrauterine adhesions formation.

Pregnancy and Adverse Obstetric Outcomes After Hysteroscopic Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

Although the randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the efficacy of hysteroscopic resection in women with uterine septum has not shown any significant correlation in recent research, motivation for deeper study remains insufficient. In this study, the objective was to determine pregnancy-related outcomes, along with adverse obstetric outcomes, following hysteroscopic resection and also to determine whether women with hysteroscopic resection bear the same outcomes as women with normal uterine cavities.

Search Methods

From January 1995 to February 2022, a systematic literature review was conducted to identify all studies published concerning the gestation outcomes of women with and without hysteroscopic resection while comparing the gestation outcomes of women after hysteroscopic resection and with a normal uterine cavity. Our primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR). The secondary outcomes were term delivery, preterm delivery, spontaneous miscarriage, malpresentation, cesarean section, and other adverse obstetric outcomes.

Results

22 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The control groups of 14 studies were treated women, and the control groups of the other 8 studies were patients bearing a normal uterine cavity. Hysteroscopic resection was related to a higher rate of term delivery (OR = 2.26, 95% CI, 1.26–4.05), and a lower rate of spontaneous abortion (OR = 0.50, 95% CI, 0.27–0.93), and a lower rate of malpresentation (OR = 0.31, 95% CI, 0.19–0.50). Nevertheless, in comparison with the normal uterus group, the rates of preterm birth, cesarean section, and postpartum hemorrhage after resection did not return to normal levels.

Conclusion

Hysteroscopic resection can effectively reduce the risk of abortion and malpresentation in patients possessing a uterine septum while increasing the term delivery rate. Although well-designed RCTs should confirm our meta-analysis, it still bears recommending to patients

See-and-treat in-office hysteroscopy versus operative hysteroscopy for the treatment of retained products of conception: A retrospective study

AIM

To compare the efficacy and safety of in-office hysteroscopy with a see-and-treat approach with that of operative hysteroscopy for the treatment of retained products of conception (RPOC).

METHODS

We retrospectively identified all consecutive patients who underwent hysteroscopic treatment of RPOC between 2015 and 2019. We excluded patients with RPOC larger than 2 cm at preoperative transvaginal ultrasounds. Between 2015 and 2017, all hysteroscopic removals of RPOC were performed by operative hysteroscopy. Between 2018 and 2019, all cases of RPOC less than 2 cm in size were hysteroscopically removed by the see-and-treat approach in the office setting. Sociodemographic, clinical, and procedure characteristics along with complications were retrieved from medical records.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2019, 119 women underwent hysteroscopic removal of RPOC equal to or smaller than 2 cm: 53 patients by in-office hysteroscopy, and 66 by operative hysteroscopy. The two groups were similar in preoperative characteristics. Although the time required to complete the RPOC removal was similar, the total procedure and assistant time were significantly higher in the operative hysteroscopy group (p < 0.001). Moreover, operative hysteroscopy was associated with a higher proportion of cases complicated by excessive bleeding, cervical tear, or uterine perforation (p = 0.016). Failure to complete the procedure was similarly reported in the two groups (p = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

In-office hysteroscopy with the see-and-treat approach for RPOC equal to or smaller than 2 cm appears as effective as operative hysteroscopy, but safer. In-office hysteroscopy may be considered the first choice for treating RPOC equal to or smaller than 2 cm.

Hysteroscopic resection for management of early pregnancy loss: a case report and literature review

Objective

To report a case of early pregnancy loss successfully managed by hysteroscopic resection, review the literature comparing hysteroscopic resection to dilation and curettage for retained products of conception, and review potential advantages of hysteroscopic resection over dilation and curettage for management of early pregnancy loss.

Design

Case report.

Setting

Private practice.

Patient(s)

One woman with early pregnancy loss.

Intervention(s)

Hysteroscopic resection using a mechanical morcellation device.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Complete uterine evacuation after hysteroscopic resection as demonstrated by a normal transvaginal ultrasound and cessation of bleeding 2 weeks after surgery.

Result(s)

The hysteroscopic fluid deficit was 365 ml, with minimal blood loss. Products of conception were confirmed on pathologic examination. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. A saline infusion sonogram obtained 4 months after surgery demonstrated a normal endometrial cavity with no intrauterine adhesions.

Conclusion(s)

Surgical management of early pregnancy loss may be complicated by retained products of conception (RPOC) or intrauterine adhesion formation, which can lead to adverse fertility outcomes in the future. Hysteroscopic resection of RPOC has been associated with fewer cases of intrauterine adhesions, more cases of complete tissue removal, and earlier time to conception compared with dilation and curettage. Early pregnancy loss can also be characterized as RPOC with potentially similar benefits from hysteroscopic resection. Thus, hysteroscopic resection can be considered as an alternative surgical technique for management of early pregnancy loss. This case report demonstrates the successful application of hysteroscopic resection in a case of early pregnancy loss.

Hysteroscopic management versus ultrasound-guided evacuation for women with first-trimester pregnancy loss, a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the hysteroscopic management of first-trimester pregnancy loss compared to surgical evacuation either blind or under ultrasonographic guidance‎.

METHODS

This clinical trial included ‎315 women with first-trimester pregnancy loss, divided equally into three groups. Group 1 underwent traditional blind surgical evacuation, group 2 underwent ultrasound-guided evacuation, and group 3 underwent hysteroscopic management. All women were assessed for retained products, surgical complications, the need for further management, and pregnancy occurrence after evacuation within 2 years of follow up.

RESULTS

The rate of presence of conception remnants and the need for further ‎treatment was significantly higher in group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3 (4.8% vs. 0% vs. 0%, P = 0.012). The conception rate within 2 years was significantly lower in group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3 (57.4% vs. 73.2% vs. 82.7%, P = 0.002), and the duration needed to conceive was significantly prolonged in group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3 (9.8 vs. 8.3 vs. 6.9 months, P < 0.001). Interestingly, women who underwent hysteroscopic management needed a significantly shorter time to conceive than those who underwent ultrasound-guided evacuation‎ (6.9 vs. 8.3 months, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Hysteroscopic management of first-trimester pregnancy loss was superior to ultrasound-guided surgical evacuation regarding the time interval to conceive. Both techniques were superior to the blind evacuation technique regarding removal of the whole conception remnants, need for further treatment and fertility outcomes. Clinical trial registration: It was first registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 16/03/2017 with registration number NCT03081104.

Postsurgical barrier strategies to avoid the recurrence of intrauterine adhesion formation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of mechanical strategies to avoid the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions, to evaluate the impact on subsequent fertility after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis and to rank the available antiadhesive options.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, CINAHL, Scielo, EMBASE, PROSPERO, Cochrane Library, conference proceedings, and international controlled trials registries were searched without temporal, geographic, and language restrictions.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomized trials that analyzed the recurrence, reproductive outcomes, or both in women undergoing hysteroscopic adhesiolysis followed by mechanical prevention of intrauterine adhesions were included. The exclusion criteria included the following: quasi-randomized trials and trials without randomization and studies including patients undergoing hysteroscopic surgery that was different from adhesiolysis.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension statement for network meta-analyses guidelines were followed. We performed a network meta-analysis based on the random effects model for mixed multiple treatment comparisons to rank the antiadhesive strategies by surface under the cumulative ranking curve area. Quality assessment was performed using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The primary outcome was the recurrent presence of intrauterine adhesions.

RESULTS

Eleven studies with data for 1596 women were identified as applicable. A copper intrauterine device together with an intrauterine balloon (surface under the cumulative ranking curve area=46.4%) or with cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel (surface under the cumulative ranking curve area=21.3%) seemed effective in preventing adhesions recurrence. Regarding the fecundity, hyaluronic acid gel demonstrated the highest pregnancy rates (surface under the cumulative ranking curve area=79.8%). The greatest degrees of change in the mean adhesions scores were found with the use of hyaluronic acid gel plus an intrauterine device (surface under the cumulative ranking curve area=38.9%). For postsurgical adhesion severity, hyaluronic acid gel plus intrauterine device (surface under the cumulative ranking curve area=49.9%) followed by intrauterine device alone (surface under the cumulative ranking curve area=30.8%) was ranked the highest. Dried amnion graft (surface under the cumulative ranking curve area=53.8%) and uterine balloon (surface under the cumulative ranking curve area=45%) showed the greatest menstrual pattern improvement.

CONCLUSION

Cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel, with or without insertion of a copper intrauterine device, seems to be the most effective approach. However, the lack of a clear best therapy suggests the need for further studies to draw firm conclusions.

In-office hysteroscopic removal of retained or fragmented intrauterine device without anesthesia: a cross-sectional analysis of an international survey

To investigate about the opinions of gynecologists regarding the in-office hysteroscopic removal of retained or fragmented intrauterine device (IUD) without anesthesia. An online survey was made available to gynecologists who routinely performed in-office hysteroscopy. Five areas of interest were analyzed: average number of hysteroscopic procedures performed without anesthesia, availability on their local market of the different types of hormonal and non-hormonal IUDs, reasons for the hysteroscopic removal of the IUD, types of IUDs that were more commonly found retained or fragmented and, overall difficulty of the hysteroscopic removal. A total of 419 surgeons voluntarily responded the survey, of which 19 were excluded for not performing in-office hysteroscopy. The most commonly available IUD was the Levonorgestrel-based Mirena (Bayer Healthcare, Germany) or similar, (399/400, 99.7%), followed by Copper T (Paragard, CooperSurgical INC, United States) (397/400, 99.2%), Multiload (234/400, 58.5%) and Jaydess (Bayer Healthcare, Germany) (227/400, 56.7%). The intracavitary retention of the IUD with (44.5%, 178/400) and without (42.2%, 169/400) visible strings accounted as the most common reason for undergoing hysteroscopic IUD removal. Copper T IUD was the most common intracavitary retained (297/400, 74.2%) as well as fragmented device (236/400, 59.9%). The in-office hysteroscopic removal of the IUD was considered an easy procedure by almost all the operators (386/400, 96.5%). In-office hysteroscopy without anesthesia is seen as a feasible and easy approach to remove retained or fragmented IUDs inside the uterine cavity or cervical canal. While the Levonorgestrel-based IUD is the most commercialized, Copper T IUDs are the most commonly found retained or fragmented.

A novel method for office aspiration curettage in cases of retained products of conception: A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Missed abortion can be treated with medication or aspiration curettage. A Karman aspiration cannula is another option. We evaluated its success in evacuating retained products of conception (RPOC) based on symptoms, endometrial thickness, endometrial irregularity, and blood flow seen on Doppler ultrasound (indicative of placenta).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective, randomized, nonblinded trial was conducted in a university-affiliated medical center. It included 40 women diagnosed with missed abortion and two failed courses of 600 µg buccal misoprostol, one  week apart, randomly assigned to treatment or controls. One week after the second misoprostol course, immediately after evaluating endometrial thickness, endometrial irregularity using Doppler ultrasound, and with blood flow indicative of RPOC, women in the aspiration group underwent endometrial suction with a Karman aspiration cannula. The 5-6 mm cannula attached to a 60 mL syringe was inserted into the uterus under ultrasound guidance. The contents were aspirated until the uterus was empty. Control group patients did not receive additional treatment. All were scheduled for ambulatory, operative hysteroscopy under anesthesia 1 month later (departmental protocol). On that day, all women with RPOC on Doppler ultrasound underwent hysteroscopy. Bleeding days, days with pain, pain according to visual analog scale, length of hospitalization, and infection rate were recorded. NIH clinical trial registration number NCT02917785.

RESULTS

In the study group, 90% did not need hysteroscopy, compared with 50% of controls (p = 0.014). No complications were noted. At all visits, we used Doppler ultrasound to exclude or confirm RPOC. Pathology revealed RPOC in all women who underwent aspiration. Average visual analog scale score for office aspiration (n = 20) was 4.9 ± 3.6. vs. 6.3 ± 3.4 for the first (p = 0.157) and 4.7 ± 3.3 for the second (p = 0.836) misoprostol treatment cycle. The treatment group experienced 6.1 days of bleeding and the control group experienced 1.4 days (p = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our criteria of diagnosing RPOC according to symptoms, endometrial thickness, endometrial irregularity, and blood flow indicative of placental tissue seen on Doppler ultrasound and histo-pathological confirmation, aspiration using Karman cannula can be an effective therapeutic approach. It may be a safe alternative for women with RPOC after misoprostol failure.

Endometrial polyps: diagnosis and treatment options - a review of literature

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Endometrial polyps (EPs) are a common gynecologic condition, associated with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), infertility, and premalignant and malignant conditions. Technologies for diagnosis and treatment of EPs are constantly evolving. We aim to provide an updated review on diagnosis and management options for patients with EPs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted an electronic search in databases including MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register and others. We included 68 publications regarding EPs, their clinical burden, diagnostic modalities, treatment options and new technologies.

RESULTS

Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) is the common modality for EP detection and color doppler increases its diagnostic accuracy. Dilation and curettage (D&C) should be avoided for diagnosis and treatment of EPs. Hysteroscopy shows high diagnostic value in EPs and allows for both histological diagnosis and effective treatment. Office hysteroscopy and see and treat hysteroscopy without anesthesia is feasible and safe for EP diagnosis and treatment, gaining more trained surgeons globally. Effective and safe technological tools for EP resection include Laser, resectoscopes, morcellators, MyoSure, Truclear and scissors\graspers.

CONCLUSIONS

EPs are safely and effectively diagnosed and treated with the hysteroscopic tools reviewed in this article. More research is needed to define the best treatment modality.