Can the radiological scale "iNPH Radscale" predict tap test response in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus?

Diffusion tensor imaging helps identify shunt-responsive normal pressure hydrocephalus patients among probable iNPH cohort

The aim of this study was to investigate whether white matter changes as measured by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can help differentiate shunt-responsive idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) patients from patients with other causes of gait disturbances and/or cognitive decline with ventriculomegaly whose clinical symptoms do not improve significantly after cerebrospinal fluid derivation (non-iNPH). Between 2017 and 2022, 85 patients with probable iNPH underwent prospective preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and comprehensive clinical workup. Patients with clinical symptoms of iNPH, positive result on lumbar infusion test, and gait improvement after 120-h lumbar drainage were diagnosed with iNPH and underwent shunt-placement surgery. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) values for individual regions of interest were extracted from preoperative MRI, using the TBSS pipeline of FSL toolkit. These FA and MD values were then compared to results of clinical workup and established diagnosis of iNPH. An identical MRI protocol was performed on 13 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers. Statistically significant differences in FA values of several white matter structures were found not only between iNPH patients and healthy controls but also between iNPH and non-iNPH patients. ROI that showed best diagnostic ability when differentiating iNPH among probable iNPH cohort was uncinate fasciculus, with AUC of 0.74 (p < 0.001). DTI methods of white matter analysis using standardised methods of ROI extraction can help in differentiation of iNPH patients not only from healthy patients but also from patients with other causes of gait disturbances with cognitive decline and ventriculomegaly.

Imaging Markers for Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: An Overview

Idiopathic bormal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurological syndrome that clinically presents with Hakim's triad, namely cognitive impairment, gait disturbances, and urinary incontinence. The fact that iNPH is potentially reversible makes its accurate and early diagnosis of paramount importance. Its main imaging characteristic is the dilation of the brain's ventricular system and the imaging parameters are also included in its diagnostic criteria along with clinical data. There is a variety of different modalities used and a great number of imaging markers that have been described while assessing iNPH patients. The present literature review attempts to describe the most important of these imaging markers and to shed some light on their role in diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and possibly prognosis of this potentially reversible neurological syndrome.

Value of MRI-based semi-quantitative structural neuroimaging in predicting the prognosis of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus after shunt surgery

OBJECTIVES

To explore the value of structural neuroimaging in predicting the prognosis of shunt surgery for idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) using two different standard semi-quantitative imaging scales.

METHODS

A total of 47 patients with iNPH who underwent shunt surgery at our hospital between 2018 and 2020 were included in this study. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and iNPH grading scale (iNPHGS) were used to evaluate and quantify the clinical symptoms before and after shunt surgery. The disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus (DESH) and iNPH Radscale scores were used to evaluate the preoperative MR images. The primary endpoint was improvement in the mRS score a year after surgery, and the secondary endpoint was the iNPHGS after 1 year. The preoperative imaging features of the improved and non-improved groups were compared.

RESULTS

The rates of the primary and secondary outcomes were 59.6% and 61.7%, respectively, 1 year after surgery. There were no significant differences in preoperative DESH score, iNPH Radscale, Evans' index (EI), or callosal angle (CA) between the improved and non-improved groups. Significant correlations were observed between the severity of gait disorder and EI and the CA.

CONCLUSIONS

The value of structural neuroimaging in predicting the prognosis of shunt surgery is limited, and screening for shunt surgery candidates should not rely only on preoperative imaging findings.

KEY POINTS

• Early shunt surgery can significantly improve the clinical symptoms and prognosis of patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). • Structural imaging findings have limited predictiveness for the prognosis of patients with iNPH after shunt surgery. • Patients should not be selected for shunt surgery based on only structural imaging findings.

CSF tap test in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: still a necessary prognostic test?

Objective

To assess whether gait, neuropsychological, and multimodal MRI parameters predict short-term symptom reversal after cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tap test in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH).

Methods

Thirty patients (79.3 ± 5.9 years, 12 women) with a diagnosis of probable iNPH and 46 healthy controls (74.7 ± 5.4 years, 35 women) underwent comprehensive neuropsychological, quantitative gait, and multimodal MRI assessments of brain morphology, periventricular white-matter microstructure, cortical and subcortical blood perfusion, default mode network function, and white-matter lesion load. Responders were defined as an improvement of at least 10% in walking speed or timed up and go test 24 h after tap test. Univariate and multivariable tap test outcome prediction models were evaluated with logistic regression and linear support vector machine classification.

Results

Sixteen patients (53%) respondedpositively to tap test. None of the gait, neuropsychological, or neuroimaging parameters considered separately predicted outcome. A multivariable classifier achieved modest out-of-sample outcome prediction accuracy of 70% (p = .028); gait parameters, white-matter lesion load and periventricular microstructure were the main contributors.

Conclusions

Our negative findings show that short-term symptom reversal after tap test cannot be predicted from single gait, neuropsychological, or MRI parameters, thus supporting the use of tap test as prognostic procedure. However, multivariable approaches integrating non-invasive multimodal data are informative of outcome and may be included in patient-screening procedures. Their value in predicting shunting outcome should be further explored, particularly in relation to gait and white-matter parameters.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-022-11168-x.

Callosal Angle Sub-Score of the Radscale in Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Is Associated with Positive Tap Test Response

The aim of the present study was the implementation of the composite imaging “Radscale” in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) and the evaluation of its score, as well as absolute stroke volume and peak flow velocity of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in aqueduct as indicators of a positive response following a tap test. Forty-five patients with iNPH were included. Clinical evaluation involved the 10 m timed walk test before and every 24 h for 3 consecutive days after evacuative lumbar puncture (LP). Neuropsychological evaluation comprised a mini mental state examination (MMSE), frontal assessment battery (FAB), 5-word test (5WT) and CLOX drawing test 1 and 2, which were carried out before and 48 h after LP. The tap test’s response was defined as a ≥20% improvement in gait and/or a ≥10% improvement in neuropsychological tests. All scores of neuropsychological and clinical variables, except for immediate 5WT and CLOX-1, differed significantly before and 48 h after LP. Improvement in time and steps of a 10 m timed walk test differed significantly between female and male patients. Out of 45 total patients, 19 were tap test responders and 26 non-responders. The total score of Radscale and CSF flow parameters did not differ between responders and non-responders. However, “Callosal angle” sub-score differed significantly between these two groups. A greater “callosal angle” sub-score, meaning more acute callosal angle, was associated with a positive tap test response, rendering it a useful measurement in the stratification of iNPH patients that will potentially respond to CSF shunting.

Can Shunt Response in Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Be Predicted from Preoperative Brain Imaging? A Retrospective Study of the Diagnostic Use of the Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale in 119 Patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale is a combined scoring of 7 different structural imaging markers on preoperative brain CT or MR imaging in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: callosal angle, Evans Index, Sylvian fissure dilation, apical sulcal narrowing, mean temporal horn diameter, periventricular WM lesions, and focal sulcal dilation. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the performance of the Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale in distinguishing idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus shunt responders from nonresponders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The preoperative MR imaging and CT scans of 119 patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus were scored using the Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale. A summary shunt-response score assessed within 6 months from ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery, combining the effect on cognition, gait, and urinary incontinence, was used as a reference. The difference between the mean Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale for responders and nonresponders was tested using the Student t test. The area under the curve was calculated for the Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale to assess shunt response. To ascertain reproducibility, we assessed the interobserver agreement between the 2 independent observers as intraclass correlation coefficients for the Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale for 74 MR imaging scans and 19 CT scans.

RESULTS

Ninety-four (79%) of 119 patients were shunt responders. The mean Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale score for shunt responders was 8.35 (SD, 1.53), and for nonresponders, 7.48 (SD, 1.53) (P = .02). The area under the curve for the Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale was 0.66 (range, 0.54-0.78). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale was 0.86 for MR imaging and 0.82 for CT.

CONCLUSIONS

The Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale showed moderate discrimination for shunt response but cannot, on its own, be used for selecting patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus for shunt surgery.

Comparison of comfortable and maximum walking speed in the 10-meter walk test during the cerebrospinal fluid tap test in iNPH patients: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The 10-meter walking test (10 MWT) is widely used during a cerebrospinal fluid tap test (CSFTT) for idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). However, various previous studies and guidelines do not specify whether to adopt a comfortable walking speed or maximum walking speed when implementing the 10 MWT. In this study, we analyzed the values of comfortable and maximum walking speeds during the CSFTT in patients who underwent shunt surgery to determine which walking form is desirable for evaluation.

METHODS

The patients were 29 consecutive cases in which a CSFTT was performed, followed by shunting, between October 2012 and April 2019. Data on the 10 MWT comfortable walking speed and maximum walking speed were collected, as were data on the timed up and go (TUG) test and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). We analyzed the rate of change in comfortable walking speed and maximum walking speed before CSFTT and on the first day after CSFTT, and the amount of improvement compared to baseline ability. In addition, diagnostic performance was compared using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients who underwent shunt surgery improved their symptoms and were designated as shunt responders. The remaining patient who underwent surgery was considered a non-responder with no improvement in symptoms. The parameters of the shunt responders that changed were muscle strength, the 10 MWT, and the TUG test, and there was no significant change in cognitive function. The rate of change, amount of change, and sensitivity were large at a comfortable walking speed, but ROC analysis showed that the maximum walking speed had a large area under the curve and excellent specificity. The higher the preoperative gait function, the lower the improvement rate of gait function.

DISCUSSION

The comfortable walking speed is easy to measure, but its specificity is inferior to the maximum walking speed. However, the maximum walking speed may be affected by the ceiling effect and measurement errors. Despite this, we concluded that the maximum walking speed had a better diagnostic performance. Because the causes of gait disturbance in iNPH include decreased muscle output, postural instability, and gait rhythm disorder, and maximum walking speed is strongly related to each of these factors, this accounts for the changes in maximum walking speed.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, although comfortable walking speed was easy to measure in terms of changes and had high sensitivity, the maximum walking speed had the highest specificity and comprehensive diagnostic performance. It is recommended that maximum walking speed be evaluated when making a definitive diagnosis of iNPH.

Clinical predictors of shunt response in the diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Positive shunt response (SR) remains the gold standard for diagnosing idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). However, multiple pathologies mimic iNPH symptoms, making it difficult to select patients who will respond to shunt surgery. Although presenting features, extended lumbar drainage (ELD), infusion test (IT), intracranial pressure monitoring (ICPM), and tap test (TT) have been used to predict SR, uncertainty remains over which diagnostic test to choose.

Objective

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify clinical predictors of shunt responsiveness, evaluate their diagnostic effectiveness, and recommend the most effective diagnostic tests.

Methods

Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, and JSTOR were searched for original studies investigating clinical predictors of SR in iNPH patients. Included studies were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, and eligible studies were evaluated using univariate and bivariate meta-analyses.

Results

Thirty-five studies were included. Nine studies discussed the diagnostic use of presenting clinical features, 8 studies ELD, 8 studies IT, 11 studies ICPM, and 6 studies TT. A meta-analysis of 21 eligible studies was conducted for TT, ELD, IT, and ICPM. ICPM yielded the highest diagnostic effectiveness, with diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) = 50.9 and area under curve (AUC) = 0.836. ELD yielded DOR = 27.70 and AUC = 0.753, IT had DOR = 5.70 and AUC = 0.729, and TT scored DOR = 3.86 and AUC = 0.711.

Conclusion

Intraparenchymal ICPM is statistically the most effective diagnostic test, followed by ELD, IT, and lastly TT. Due to the higher accessibility of TT and IT, they are recommended to be used first line, using a timed-up-and-go improvement ≥ 5.6 s or a Rout cut-off range between 13 and 16 mmHg, respectively. Patients who test negative should ideally be followed up with ICPM, using mean ICP wave amplitude \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\ge$$\end{document}≥ 4 mmHg, or 1- to 4-day ELD with an MMSE cut-off improvement \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\ge$$\end{document}≥ 3. Future research must use standardized methodologies for each diagnostic test and uniform criteria for SR to allow better comparison.