Which surgical procedure is effective for refractory chronic subdural hematoma? Analysis of our surgical procedures and literature review

ARISE I Consensus Statement on the Management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma

ARISE (Aneurysm/AVM/cSDH Roundtable Discussion With Industry and Stroke Experts) organized a one-and-a-half day meeting and workshop and brought together representatives from academia, industry, and government to discuss the most promising approaches to improve outcomes for patients with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). The emerging role of middle meningeal artery embolization in clinical practice and the design of current and potential future trials were the primary focuses of discussion. Existing evidence for imaging, indications, agents, and techniques was reviewed, and areas of priority for study and key questions surrounding the development of new and existing treatments for cSDH were identified. Multiple randomized, controlled trials have met their primary efficacy end points, providing high-level evidence that middle meningeal artery embolization is a potent adjunctive therapy to the standard (surgical and nonsurgical) management of neurologically stable cSDH patients in terms of reducing rates of disease recurrence. Pooled data analyses following the formal conclusion and publication of these trials will form a robust foundation upon which guidelines can be strengthened for cSDH treatment modalities and optimal patient selection, as well as delineate future lines of investigation.

Safety and efficacy comparison of embolic agents for middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy of middle meningeal artery embolization in terms of both clinical and radiographic outcomes, when performed with different embolic agents.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of embolic agents on outcomes for middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization. The use of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) with or without (±) coils, N-butyl cyanoacrylate (n-BCA) ± coils, and Onyx alone were separately evaluated. Primary outcome measures were recurrence, the need for surgical rescue and in-hospital periprocedural complications.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies were identified with a total of 1,134 patients, with 786 receiving PVA, 167 receiving n-BCA, and 181 patients receiving Onyx. There was no difference in the recurrence rate (5.5% for PVA, 4.5% for n-BCA, and 6.5% for Onyx, with P=0.71) or need for surgical rescue (5.0% for PVA, 4.0% for n-BCA, and 6.9% for Onyx, with P=0.89) based on the embolic agent. Procedural complications also did not differ between embolic agents (1.8% for PVA, 3.6% for n-BCA, and 1.6% for Onyx, with P=0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of recurrence, need for surgical rescue, and periprocedural complication following MMA embolization are not impacted by the type of embolic agent utilized. Ongoing clinical trials may be used to further investigate these findings.

Analysis of middle meningeal artery embolization for the treatment of chronic, acute on chronic, and subacute subdural hematomas

Background

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common sequela of traumatic brain injury. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has shown promising results as an emerging minimally invasive alternative treatment. The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of MMAE performed in patients with cSDH, acute-on-chronic, and subacute SDH with a traumatic etiology.

Methods

This retrospective study included cases performed at a Level II Trauma Center between January 2019 and December 2020 for MMAE of cSDHs. Data collected included patient demographic characteristics and comorbidities, SDH characteristics, complications, and efficacy outcomes. The lesion measurements were collected before the procedure, 4-6 weeks and 3-6 months post-procedure.

Results

In our patient population, 78% (39) either had lesions improve or completely resolved. The sample included 50 patients with a mean age of 74 years old. Statistically significant reductions in lesion size were found from pre- to post-procedure in the left lesions, right lesions, and midline shifts. The left lesions decreased from 13.88 ± 5.70 mm to 3.19 ± 4.89 mm at 3-6 months with P < 0.001. The right lesions decreased from 13.74 ± 5.28 mm to 4.93 ± 7.46 mm at 3-6 months with P = 0.02. Midline shifts decreased from 3.78 ± 3.98 mm to 0.48 ± 1.31 mm at 3-6 months with P = 0.02. No complications were experienced for bleeding, hematoma, worsening SDH, pseudoaneurysm, or stroke.

Conclusion

Our pilot study from a single center utilizing MMAE demonstrates that MMAE is successful without increasing treatment-related complications not only for cSDH but also in acute-on-cSDH and SDH with a subacute component.

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Refractory Chronic Subdural Hematoma Associated with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Case Report

Objective

We describe a patient with leukemia-related chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) who was successfully treated using the combination of surgical evacuation and middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization.

Case Presentation

A 73-year-old man without apparent head trauma history was admitted to our hospital because of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Head CT on admission revealed mild CSDH on both sides. Medical treatment options, including chemotherapy, were started. Since a decrease in platelet count and disseminated intravascular coagulation were observed on day 4, recombinant thrombomodulin was administered. As the patient exhibited signs of altered consciousness due to the enlargement of the right CSDH on day 10, we performed surgical drainage. Despite subsequent platelet transfusion and administration of goreisan, the right CSDH recurred within a short period. On day 17, we performed the second surgery and MMA embolization in one stage. The postoperative clinical course was favorable without recurrence of the hematoma. The patient eventually died on day 123 from a deterioration of his general condition.

Conclusion

Although MMA embolization has recently been recognized as an effective treatment option for recurrent CSDH, there are no published reports addressing the efficacy of MMA embolization for refractory CSDH associated with hematological malignancies. Findings from the management of this case suggest that MMA embolization can be the effective treatment option for CSDH in patients with severe hemorrhagic diathesis due to AML.

Immediate procedural safety of adjunctive proximal coil occlusion in middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematomas: Experience in 137 cases

BACKGROUND

Endovascular embolization of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) has emerged as an adjunctive and stand-alone modality for the management of chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH). We report our experience utilizing proximal MMA coil embolization to augment cSDH devascularization in MMA embolization.

METHODS

MMA embolization cases with adjunctive proximal MMA coiling were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained IRB-approved database of the senior authors.

RESULTS

Of the 137 cases, all patients (n = 89, 100%) were symptomatic and underwent an MMA embolization procedure for cSDH. 50 of the patients underwent bilateral embolizations, with 53% (n = 72) for left-sided and 47% (n = 65) for right-sided cSDH. The anterior MMA branch was embolized in 19 (14%), posterior in 16 (12%), and both in 102 (74.5%) cases. Penetration of the liquid embolic to the contralateral MMA or into the falx was present in 38 (28%) and 31 (23%) cases, respectively, and 46 (34%) cases had ophthalmic or petrous collateral (n = 41, 30%) branches. MMA branches coiled include the primary trunk (25.5%, n = 35), primary and anterior or posterior MMA trunks (20%, n = 28), or primary with the anterior and posterior trunks (54%, n = 74). A mild ipsilateral facial nerve palsy was reported, which remained stable at discharge and follow-up. Absence of anterograde flow in the MMA occurred in 137 (100%) cases, and no cases required periprocedural rescue surgery for cSDH evacuation. The average follow-up length was 170 ± 17.9 days, cSDH was reduced by 4.24 ± 0.5(mm) and the midline shift by 1.46 ± 0.27(mm). Complete resolution was achieved in 63 (46.0%) cases.

CONCLUSION

Proximal MMA coil embolization is a safe technique for providing additional embolization/occlusion of the MMA in cSDH embolization procedures. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential added efficacy of this technique.

The Effect of Japanese Herbal Medicines (Kampo) Goreisan and Saireito on the Prevention of Recurrent Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Prospective Randomized Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) sometimes recurs after surgical treatment and requires reoperation. In Japan, Japanese herbal medicines (Kampo), such as Goreisan and Saireito, have been used as adjunctive therapies to prevent the recurrence of CSDH. However, no prospective randomized study has proven the efficacy of Kampo medicine in all patients. To investigate whether Goreisan and Saireito reduce the postoperative recurrence of CSDH in a prospective randomized study.

METHODS

Between April 2017 and July 2019, a total of 118 patients who underwent initial burr hole surgery for CSDH were randomly assigned to the following 3 groups: (1) Goreisan for 3 months (Group G), (2) Saireito for 3 months (Group S), and (3) no medication (Group N). The primary end point was symptomatic recurrence within 3 months postoperatively, and the secondary end point was complications associated with the administration of Kampo medicine.

RESULTS

Among 118 patients, 114 (Group N, n = 39; Group G, n = 37; and Group S, n = 38) were included in our analysis. In this study, byakujutsu (containing Atractylodes rhizome ) Goreisan and Saireito were used, unlike other prospective randomized studies in which sojutsu (containing Atractylodes lancea rhizome) Goreisan was used. The overall recurrence rate was 11.4% (13/114: 10 for Group N, 2 for Group G, and 1 for Group S). The recurrence rate of Group G was significantly lower than that of Group N (5.4% vs 25.6%; P = .043). The recurrence rate of Group S was also significantly lower than that of Group N (2.6% vs 25.6%; P = .02). No patients developed complications associated with the administration of Kampo medicine.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to show that Kampo medicine reduced the recurrence rate of CSDH in an overall population. This study demonstrated that byakujutsu Goreisan and Saireito may have favorable effects, unlike other studies, because byakujutsu has stronger anti-inflammatory activity than sojutsu.

Comparative study on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of chronic subdural hematomas treated by middle meningeal artery embolization and conventional treatment: a national cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The authors compared the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) and conventional treatment for chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH).

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmissions Database of 9963 patients (27.2% women) with cSDH between 2016 and 2020 was analyzed. Finally, 9532 patients were included (95.7%, treated conventionally; 4.3%, treated with MMAE). Baseline demographics, comorbidities, adverse events, treatment strategies, and outcomes were compared between patients treated with MMAE and conventional treatment. After propensity score matching, the authors compared primary outcomes, including the 90-day treatment rate, functional outcome, length of hospital stays, and cost. A Markov model estimated lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with different treatments. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to evaluate the base-case scenario. One-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the uncertainty in the results.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, MMAE had a lower 90-day retreatment rate (2.6 vs. 9.0%, P =0.001), shorter length of hospital stays (4.61±6.19 vs. 5.73±5.76 days, P =0.037), similar functional outcomes compared (favorable outcomes, 80.9 vs. 74.8%, P =0.224) but higher costs ($119 757.71±90 378.70 vs. $75 745.55±100 701.28, P <0.001) with conventional treatment. MMAE was associated with an additional cost of US$19 280.0 with additional QALY of 1.3. Its ICER was US$15199.8/QALY.

CONCLUSION

MMAE is more effective in treating cSDH than conventional treatment. Based on real-world data, though MMAE incurs higher overall costs, the Markov model showed it to be cost-effective compared to conventional treatment under the American healthcare system. These comparative and economic analyses further support the consideration of a paradigm shift in cSDH treatment.

A systematic review of middle meningeal artery embolization for minimally symptomatic chronic subdural haematomas that do not require immediate evacuation

Introduction

Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (EMMA) is an emerging treatment option for patients with Chronic Subdural Haematoma (CSDH).

Questions

(1) Can EMMA change the natural history of untreated minimally symptomatic CSDH which do not require immediate evacuation? (2) What is the role of EMMA in the prevention of recurrence following surgical treatment? (3) Can the procedure be performed under local anaesthetic?

Material and methods

Systematic literature review. No randomised clinical trials available on EMMA for meta-analysis.

Results

Six unique large cohorts with more than 50 embolisations were identified (evidence: 3b-4). EMMA can control the progression of surgically naïve CSDH in 91.1-100% of the patients, in which haematoma expansion is halted, or the lesion decreases and resolves. Treatment failure requiring surgery occurs in 0-4.1% of the patients having EMMA as the primary and only treatment. Treatment failure requiring surgery goes up slightly to 6.8% if post-surgical patients are included. When EMMA is used as postsurgical adjunctive the risk of recurrence is 1.4-8.9% compared to 10-20% in surgical series. EMMA has minimal morbidity and it is feasible under local anaesthesia or slight sedation in the majority of cases.

Conclusion

There is cumulative low-quality evidence in the literature that EMMA may be able to modify the natural course of the disease. It appears effective in controlling progression of CSDHs in patients having it as a primary standing alone treatment and it reduces the risk of recurrence and the need for surgical intervention in refractory postsurgical cases or as a postsurgical adjunctive treatment with minimal morbidity (recommendation: C).

Comparison of different surgical techniques for chronic subdural hematoma: a network meta-analysis

Background

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a neurosurgical condition with high prevalence. Many surgical approaches are recommended for treating CSDH, but there needs to be a consensus on the optimal technique. This network meta-analysis (NMA) compared the efficacy and safety of different surgical treatments for CSDH.

Methods

Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, were searched for relevant studies up to February 2023. An NMA was performed to compare the outcomes of patients with CSDH treated by single-hole or double-hole craniotomy (SBHC and DBHC, respectively), twist-drill craniotomy (TDC), mini-craniotomy, and craniotomy. The NMA protocol was registered at INPLASY (registration no. 202320114).

Results

The NMA included 38 studies with 7,337 patients. For efficacy outcomes, DBHC showed the highest surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) values for recurrence (96.3%) and reoperation (87.4%) rates. DBHC differed significantly from mini-craniotomy in recurrence rate (odds ratio [OR] = 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35, 0.97) and from SBHC (OR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25, 0.91) and TDC (OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.20, 0.82) in reoperation rate. For operative time, TDC was superior to SBHC (mean difference [MD] = -2.32, 95% CI: -3.78 to -0.86), DBHC (MD = -3.61, 95% CI: -5.55, -1.67), and mini-craniotomy (MD = -3.39, 95% CI: -5.70, -1.08). Patients treated by TDC had a shorter hospital stay than those treated by SBHC (MD = -0.82, 95% CI: -1.51, -0.12). For safety outcomes, there were no significant differences between groups in mortality and complication rates; however, mini-craniotomy (79.8%) and TDC (78.1%) had the highest SUCRAs.

Conclusion

DBHC may be the most effective surgical treatment for CSDH based on the low recurrence and reoperation rates, although all examined techniques were relatively safe.

Systematic review registration

https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2023-2-0114/.

Recurrent Subdural Hematoma: An Institutional Experience

Background Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common neurosurgical problem, which offers a good outcome following surgery. In many cases, burr hole irrigation and drainage under local anesthesia can provide satisfactory results. However, recurrence can be a cause for concern for both the surgeon and the patient. While recurrence is not a frequent phenomenon, studies have reported rates of up to 31.6%. Aims and objectives In this study, our objective is to examine a comprehensive range of potential risk factors and provide valuable insights into identifying patients at a higher risk of recurrence to aid in surgical decision-making. Methodology This study employed a prospective and retrospective design, conducted between 2017 and 2021, at Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research. The study received ethical approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. The research aimed to assess patients who underwent surgery for CSDH, with a particular focus on those who experienced recurrence. Results The average age of patients with recurrence was 71.5 years compared to 65.2 years in the no-recurrence group, but this difference did not show a significant statistical correlation. A significant male predominance was observed, with 27 men and four women affected (out of a total of 147 men and 73 women in the study), resulting in a statistically significant p-value of 0.01. On multivariate analysis, heterogenous subtypes were a significant predictor of recurrence (OR: 8.88, 95% CI: 6.96-16.54, p = 0.01). The mean midline shift in those with recurrence was 11.4 mm compared to 7.09 mm in those without recurrence. This was a statistically significant correlation with a p-value of 0.02. Regarding those with recurrence, 24 patients underwent evacuation using two burr holes, with one placed in the frontal region and another in the parietal region. All of these patients had a subdural drain placed, which was removed on postoperative day 2. The remaining eight patients underwent a mini-craniotomy for evacuation. We had four cases of refractory CSDH, all of whom underwent the second evacuation using burr holes. Three of them underwent evacuation via craniotomy, while the family of the fourth patient did not give consent for the procedure. Conclusion Patient-related factors such as gender, bilateral presentation, and the presence of hypertension and radiological factors such as the presence of heterogenous subtype and a significant midline shift are clues toward a higher chance of recurrence.

Surgical techniques for evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma: a mini-review

Chronic subdural hematoma is one of the most common neurosurgical pathologies with over 160,000 cases in the United States and Europe each year. The current standard of care involves surgically evacuating the hematoma through a cranial opening, however, varied patient risk profiles, a significant recurrence rate, and increasing financial burden have sparked innovation in the field. This mini-review provides a brief overview of currently used evacuation techniques, including emerging adjuncts such as endoscopic assistance and middle meningeal artery embolization. This review synthesizes the body of available evidence on efficacy and risk profiles for each critical aspect of surgical technique in cSDH evacuation and provides insight into trends in the field and promising new technologies.

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization Versus Conventional Management for Patients With Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The results from studies that compare middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization vs conventional management for patients with chronic subdural hematoma are varied.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on studies that compared MMA embolization vs conventional management.

METHODS

Medline, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched. Primary outcomes were treatment failure and surgical rescue; secondary outcomes were complications, follow-up modified Rankin scale > 2, mortality, complete hematoma resolution, and length of hospital stay (day). The certainty of the evidence was determined using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Nine studies yielding 1523 patients were enrolled, of which 337 (22.2%) and 1186 (77.8%) patients received MMA embolization and conventional management, respectively. MMA embolization was superior to conventional management for treatment failure (relative risk [RR] = 0.34 [0.14-0.82], P = .02), surgical rescue (RR = 0.33 [0.14-0.77], P = .01), and complete hematoma resolution (RR = 2.01 [1.10-3.68], P = .02). There was no difference between the 2 groups for complications (RR = 0.93 [0.63-1.37], P = .72), follow-up modified Rankin scale >2 (RR = 0.78 [0.449-1.25], P = .31), mortality (RR = 1.05 [0.51-2.14], P = .89), and length of hospital stay (mean difference = -0.57 [-2.55, 1.41], P = .57). For MMA embolization, the number needed to treat for treatment failure, surgical rescue, and complete hematoma resolution was 7, 9, and 3, respectively. The certainty of the evidence was moderate to high for primary outcomes and low to moderate for secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

MMA embolization decreases treatment failure and the need for surgical rescue without furthering the risk of morbidity and mortality. The authors recommend considering MMA embolization in the chronic subdural hematoma management.

The efficacy of postoperative middle meningeal artery embolization on chronic subdural hematoma - A multicentered randomized controlled trial

Background

Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization has recently emerged as a potential treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). Numerous retrospective studies have suggested that it can potentially reduce the risk of hematoma recurrence following surgical evacuation. We have conducted a randomized controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of postoperative MMA embolization in reducing recurrence rate, residual hematoma thickness as well as improving functional outcome.

Methods

Patients aged 18 or above were recruited. Following evacuation through burr hole or craniotomy, patients were randomly allocated to undergo either MMA embolization or standard care (monitoring). The primary outcome was symptomatic recurrence requiring redo evacuation. Secondary outcomes include residual hematoma thickness and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6 weeks and 3 months.

Results

Thirty-six patients (41 cSDHs) were recruited between April 2021 and September 2022. Seventeen patients (19 cSDHs) were allocated to the embolization group and 19 patients (22 cSDHs) were in the control group. No symptomatic recurrence was observed in the treatment group while 3 control patients (15.8%) underwent repeat surgery for symptomatic recurrence, however, it was not statistically significant (P = 0.234). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in residual hematoma thickness at 6 weeks or 3 months between the two groups. All patients in the embolization group had a good functional outcome (mRS 0-1) at 3 months, which was significantly higher than the 53% observed in the control group. No complications related to MMA embolization were reported.

Conclusion

Further study with larger sample size is required to evaluate the efficacy of MMA embolization.

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization in the Management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: a Comprehensive Review of Current Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common intracranial hemorrhagic disorder with a high incidence rate among the elderly. While small, asymptomatic cSDH may resolve spontaneously, surgical intervention has been the treatment of choice for larger, symptomatic cases. Surgical evacuation of cSDH may be associated with high rates of recurrence, and even asymptomatic cSDH cases tend to progress. Over the last few years, middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization has proven to be a safe non-invasive treatment of choice with favorable outcomes and a low recurrence rate. The ensuing paper discusses current treatment modalities for cSDH and reviews existing literature on the anatomy of MMA and its embolization as a treatment option for cSDH.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies show that traumatic head injury leading to subdural hemorrhage can induce neovascularization that may initiate a cycle of recurrent subdural hematoma. Distal branches of MMA supply blood to the dural layers. Several studies have revealed that embolization of the MMA can stop the neovascularization process and blood flow. In addition, patients who underwent MMA embolization had a significantly quicker brain re-expansion and lower recurrence rate. Although the management of cSDH is still very much a dilemma, recent research findings bring MMA embolization to light as a promising treatment alternative and adjunctive therapy.

Is information provided within chronic subdural haematoma education resources adequate? A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is becoming increasingly prevalent, due to an aging population with increasing risk factors. Due to its variable disease course and high morbidity, patient centred care and shared decision making are essential. However, its occurrence in frail populations, remote from specialist neurosurgeons who currently triage treatment decisions, challenges this. Education is an important component of enabling shared decisions. This should be targeted to avoid information overload. However, it is unknown what this should be.

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to conduct analysis of the content of existing CSDH educational materials, to inform the development of patient and relative educational resources to facilitate shared decision making.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted (July 2021) of MEDLINE, Embase and grey literature, for all self-specified resources on CSDH education, and narrative reviews. Resources were classified into a hierarchical framework using inductive thematic analysis into 8 core domains: Aetiology, epidemiology and pathophysiology; natural history and risk factors; symptoms; diagnosis; surgical management; nonsurgical management; complications and recurrence; and outcomes. Domain provision was summarised using descriptive statistics and Chi-squared tests.

RESULTS

56 information resources were identified. 30 (54%) were resources designed for healthcare professionals (HCPs), and 26 (46%) were patient-orientated resources. 45 (80%) were specific to CSDH, 11 (20%) covered head injury, and 10 (18%) referenced both acute and chronic SDH. Of 8 core domains, the most reported were aetiology, epidemiology and pathophysiology (80%, n = 45) and surgical management (77%, n = 43). Patient orientated resources were more likely to provide information on symptoms (73% vs 13%, p<0.001); and diagnosis (62% vs 10%, p<0.001) when compared to HCP resources. Healthcare professional orientated resources were more likely to provide information on nonsurgical management (63% vs 35%, p = 0.032), and complications/recurrence (83% vs 42%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The content of educational resources is varied, even amongst those intended for the same audience. These discrepancies indicate an uncertain educational need, that will need to be resolved in order to better support effective shared decision making. The taxonomy created can inform future qualitative studies.

Long-Term Middle Meningeal Artery Caliber Reduction Following Trisacryl Gelatine Microsphere Embolization for the Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma

PURPOSE

Middle meningeal artery (MMA) particle embolization is a promising treatment of chronic subdural hematomas (CSDH). The main purpose of this study is to measure MMA proximal caliber and assess the visibility of the two main MMA branches as a surrogate for long-term distal arterial patency following MMA CSDH embolization with trisacryl gelatine microspheres (TAGM).

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective study. All patients having undergone MMA TAGM only embolization for CSDH treatment between 15 March 2018 and 6 June 2020 with an interpretable follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination and no confounding factors were included. Patients were compared with controls matched for age, sex and MRI machine. Two independent readers analyzed the MRI images.

RESULTS

In this study, 30 patients having undergone embolization procedures using TAGM of 36 MMAs were included. The follow-up MRI scans were performed after a mean delay of 14.8 ± 7.1 months (range 4.9-29.4 months). The mean diameter of TAGM embolized MMAs (1 mm; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.9-1.1) was significantly smaller than the mean diameter of paired control MMAs (1.3 mm; 95% CI 1.3-1.4) (p < 0.001). The mean proximal diameter of the embolized MMAs (0.9 mm; 95% CI 0.7-1.1) was significantly smaller than the mean diameter of the contralateral MMAs in the same patients (1.4 mm; 95% CI 1.3-1.6)(p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Long-term follow-up MRI demonstrated a significant impact of TAGM embolization on MMA proximal caliber as well as on the visibility of the two main MMA branches. All comparisons indicated that there was a probable lasting impact of embolization on the patency of distal branches.

Modified Valsalva maneuver after burr-hole drainage of chronic subdural hematomas: A single-center cohort study

Background

Previous studies on the management of chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) mainly focused on the risk of postoperative recurrence and measures to prevent it. In this study, we propose the use of a non-invasive postoperative treatment method, the modified Valsalva maneuver (MVM), as a means of reducing the recurrence of cSDH. This study aims to clarify the effects of MVM on functional outcomes and recurrence rates.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted at the Department of Neurosurgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology from November 2016 to December 2020. The study included 285 adult patients who underwent burr-hole drainage for the treatment of cSDH and received subdural drains. These patients were divided into two groups: the MVM group (n = 117) and the control group (n = 98). In the MVM group, patients received treatment with a customized MVM device for at least 10 times per hour, 12 h per day. The study's primary endpoint was the recurrence rate of SDH, while functional outcomes and morbidity 3 months after surgery were the secondary outcomes.

Results

In the current study, 9 out of 117 patients (7.7%) in the MVM group experienced a recurrence of SDH, while 19 out of 98 patients (19.4%, p < 0.05) in the HC group experienced a recurrence of SDH. Additionally, the infection rate of diseases such as pneumonia (1.7%) was significantly lower in the MVM group compared to the HC group (9.2%, p < 0.001, odds ratio (OR = 0.1). After 3 months of the surgery, 109 out of 117 patients (93.2%) in the MVM group achieved a favorable prognosis, compared to 80 out of 98 patients (81.6%) in the HC group (p = 0.008, with an OR of 2.9). Additionally, infection rate (with an OR of 0.2) and age (with an OR of 0.9) are independent predictors of a favorable prognosis at the follow-up stage.

Conclusions

The use of MVM in the postoperative management of cSDHs has been shown to be safe and effective, resulting in reduced rates of cSDH recurrence and infection following burr-hole drainage. These findings suggest that MVM treatment may lead to a more favorable prognosis at the follow-up stage.

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Primary Treatment of a Chronic Subdural Hematoma in a Pediatric Patient: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Case Report

BACKGROUND

Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization is becoming increasingly studied as a safe, effective treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) in adults. Among pediatric patients, however, MMA embolization for cSDH has been rarely described, and the potential benefit of this approach for pediatric patients remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature and identify cases of pediatric MMA embolization for cSDH. We also report our experience with pediatric MMA embolization.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify cases of pediatric MMA embolization for cSDH. Inclusion criteria included English language availability and pediatric age defined as less than 18 years. A pediatric patient treated with MMA embolization was also identified at our institution.

RESULTS

Five cases of pediatric MMA embolization for cSDH were identified in the literature. Two were associated with arachnoid cysts, 2 with antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy, and 1 with abusive head trauma. There were no adverse events, and all patients demonstrated clinical and radiological improvement on follow-up. At our institution, a previously healthy 8-year-old male was found to have a right-sided acute-on-chronic SDH during a headache evaluation. A diagnostic angiogram was performed to rule out a dural arteriovenous fistula, and right-sided MMA embolization was performed concurrently. Rapid clinical and radiological improvement was observed, with complete resolution by 6 months.

CONCLUSION

MMA embolization may represent a treatment option for pediatric patients with cSDH.

Onyx Versus Particles for Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization in Chronic Subdural Hematoma

BACKGROUND

Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization has recently emerged as a treatment option for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). It is considered a simple and potentially safe endovascular procedure.

OBJECTIVE

To compare between 2 different embolic agents; onyx (ethylene vinyl alcohol) and emboparticles (polyvinyl alcohol particles-PVA) for endovascular treatment of cSDH.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent MMA embolization for cSDH treatment in 2 comprehensive centers between August 2018 and December 2021. Primary outcomes were failure of embolization and need for rescue surgical evacuation.

RESULTS

Among 97 MMA embolizations, 49 (50.5%) received onyx and 48 (49.5%) received PVA. The presence of acute or subacute on cSDH was higher in the PVA group 11/49 (22.5%) vs 30/48 (62.5%), respectively, P < .001. There were no significant differences between both groups regarding failure of embolization 6/49 (12.2%) vs 12/48 (25.0%), respectively, P = .112, and need of unplanned rescue surgical evacuation 5/49 (10.2%) vs 8/48 (16.7%), respectively, P = .354. Hematoma thickness at late follow-up was significantly smaller in the PVA group 7.8 mm vs 4.6 mm, respectively; P = .017.

CONCLUSION

Both onyx and PVA as embolic agents for cSDH can be used safely and have comparable clinical and surgical outcomes.

Middle meningeal artery embolization for treatment of chronic subdural hematoma

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is caused by rupture of bridging intracranial veins located in the subdural space. Predominantly, cSDH is a disease of older adults and other predisposing risk factors include minor head trauma, cerebral atrophy, antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapies, arterial hypertension, cerebrovascular atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, cerebrospinal fluid loss, and excessive alcohol consumption. The incidence of cSDH is rising worldwide due to an aging population and the increased use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications. Clinical manifestations are varied, with altered mental status and focal neurologic deficits among the most common.

METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS

Treatment strategies depend on the symptomatology and extent of hematoma. In general, conservative treatment is sought for patients who are asymptomatic or have only mild symptoms, whereas symptomatic patients are often treated surgically. However, the recurrence rate of cSDH may be as high as 30%. In recent years, middle meningeal artery embolization has emerged as a complementary option to surgery aimed at decreasing the recurrence rate after excision as well as an alternative therapeutic approach to surgical therapy in certain circumstances.

CONCLUSION

Embolization of the middle meningeal artery appears to be a promising treatment for patients with cSDH, both before and after surgical excision.

Middle meningeal artery embolisation for chronic subdural haematomas: the first prospective UK study

Background/Objectives: MMA embolisation has emerged in recent years as a safe endovascular treatment for chronic subdural haematoma. We report the first UK series of endovascular treatment of chronic subdural haematomas.Design: Prospective case series.Subjects: All adult patients referred with midline shift ≤10 mm and GCS ≥13 were considered. Patients had to be mobile with a standard origin of Middle Meningeal and Ophthalmic arteries. Patients with GCS < 13 or profound weakness (MRC grade ≤ 3) were treated with burr hole drainage and placement of subdural drains.Methods: Patients were recruited over a 14-month period from 25 October 2020 to 25 December 21 through our electronic referral system. Patients' demographics, pre-morbid modified Rankin Score (mRS), symptoms; anticoagulation and co-morbidities were prospectively collected. Suitability for endovascular treatment was discussed with the interventional neuroradiologist and neurosurgeon. SQUID-12 embolic material was used for all MMA embolisations, which was performed under general anaesthetic. Baseline CT/MRI characteristics were collected. Further imaging was obtained at 7, 21, 90 and 180 days. Clinical assessment and mRS was completed at three months.Results: Fifteen patients underwent endovascular embolisation of MMA in the study period. Of these 13 were male, median age was 79 years. Median length of stay was four days. Follow-up CT at three months has demonstrated significant reduction in both midline shift (p = 0.002) and maximum thickness of haematoma (p = 0.001). Nine patients had reached the three months' follow-up period. All of them had complete or near-complete resolution of the CSDH. One patient required surgical rescue at two months post procedure due to progression of CSDH. We report one mortality due to COVID-19.Conclusions: For select patients, MMA embolisation is a safe alternative treatment option for chronic subdural haematoma. As we gain more experience, the procedure could be performed under local anaesthetic.

Conservative Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma with Gorei-san

Most asymptomatic patients with chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) are followed conservatively but can require surgical treatment if the hematoma expands. We conducted a retrospective evaluation of the effect of Gorei-san on CSDH. This study included patients treated between April 2013 and March 2015. In total, 289 patients were diagnosed with CSDH and 110 patients received conservative management. Finally, 39 patients who met the requirements were registered. We retrospectively examined the age, gender, medical history, hematoma thickness, clarity of sulci below hematomas, and midline shift of the patients. The primary outcome was the median surgery-free interval, and the secondary results were the rate of CSDH shrinkage and surgery avoidance. A comparison of patient characteristics between the Gorei-san (G) and non-Gorei-san (NG) groups found no significant differences in the percentage of men, average ages, past history, thickness of CSDH (15.0 ± 3.1 mm vs. 15.3 ± 2.6 mm, p = 0.801), or midline shift (2.0 ± 2.7 mm vs. 4.0 ± 5.0 mm, p = 0.230). The median surgery-free interval was significantly different between the G and NG groups [n. r. vs. 41 days (95% CI: 5-79), log-rank p = 0.047]. The CSDH avoidance rate was not significantly different between the two groups (70.0% vs. 34.4%, p = 0.071). Additionally, the CSDH shrinkage rate was significantly different between the two groups (60.0% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.004). This retrospective study demonstrated that CSDH treatment with Gorei-san reduces hematoma significantly more than treatment that does not include Gorei-san.

Sequential Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization after Burr Hole Surgery for Recurrent Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a novel, minimally invasive treatment. The indications and treatment practices for MMAE are variable and remain controversial. This study aimed to evaluate a strategy involving sequential MMAE after burr hole surgery for treating recurrent CSDH. We performed a retrospective analysis of data from consecutive patients who had undergone MMAE using liquid embolic agents within approximately 2 weeks after burr hole surgery for recurrent CSDH from September 2020 to March 2022. We analyzed patient characteristics, procedural details, CSDH recurrence after MMAE, surgical rescue, and complications. Six of the nine patients who underwent MMAE for CSDH recurrence were male, and the median age was 85 (range, 70-94) years. Five of the nine patients were being administered antithrombotic agents. The median duration between the burr hole surgery and MMAE procedure was 10 (range, 3-25) days. Anterior and posterior convexity branches were targeted for embolization using low-concentration N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA), and the abnormal vascular networks with a cotton wool appearance disappeared after embolization in all cases. The NBCA distribution was observed by high-resolution computed tomography during the procedure; in three of nine cases, the NBCA penetrated not only the MMA but also the inner membrane. No recurrence, surgical rescue, or complications were observed in any patient during the median follow-up period of 3 months. As a minimally invasive treatment for recurrent CSDH, sequential MMAE after burr hole surgery may be a safe and effective option for preventing recurrence.

Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Scoping Review

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical entities, especially in the elderly population. Diagnosis is usually established via a head computed tomography, while an increasing number of studies are investigating biomarkers to predict the natural history of cSDH, including progression and recurrence. Surgical evacuation remains the mainstay of treatment in the overwhelming majority of cases. Nevertheless, many controversies are associated with the nuances of surgical treatment. We performed a systematic review of the literature between 2010 and 2022, aiming to identify and address the issues in cSDH surgical management where consensus is lacking. The results show ambiguous data in regard to indication, the timing and type of surgery, the duration of drainage, concomitant membranectomy and the need for embolization of the middle meningeal artery. Other aspects of surgical treatment-such as the use of drainage and its location and number of burr holes-seem to have been adequately clarified: the drainage of hematoma is strongly recommended and the outcome is considered as independent of drainage location or the number of burr holes.

Hematoma cavity separation and neomembrane thickness are potential triggers of recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma

Background

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is the anomalous and encapsulated accumulation of fluid of complex origin consisting of old blood, mostly or totally liquified and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the subdural space usually after a head injury in the elderly. Almost all the research on surgical techniques and endoscopic assisted evacuation of CSDH focused on the just the evacuation and not abnormal anatomical structures that causes recurrences.

Objectives

We investigated abnormal anatomical structures that triggers recurrence of CSDH during craniotomy as well as burr-hole craniostomy with endoscopic assistance.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyzed all patients with CSDH who underwent craniostomy and burr-hole craniotomy with endoscopic assisted evacuation of hematoma between April 2017 and November 2020 at our institution. Clinical data obtained was categorized into patient-related, radiology as well as surgery and endoscopic evaluations.

Results

A total of 143 patients (109 men and 34 women) aged 43–94 years (mean age, 68.35 years) with CSDH were included in this study. We observed a recurrence rate of 4.9% (7/143). Recurrences occurred between 2 and 6 months after the operation in patients with recurrences. Our data revealed that, age, hypertension, history of injury, diabetes, antiplatelet or anticoagulant use were not associated with hematoma recurrence. Nevertheless, all the patients with recurrence of hematoma were males. Interestingly, our univariate and multivariate analyses found neomembrane thickness and hematoma cavity separation as independent risk factors (OR,45.822; 95% CI,2.666-787.711; p = 0.008) for the recurrence of CSDH (p < 0.05). Also, we observed thickened membranes connecting/separating the dura and the thickened arachnoid/pia matters in all the 7 patients with hematoma recurrence.

Conclusions

The treatment of patients with CSDH ought to include the identification and resection of abnormal thickened membranes connecting/separating the dura and the thickened arachnoid/pia matters to avoid recurrence. Comparatively, endoscopy showed hematoma cavity separation or neomembrane thickness just as seen during craniotomy.

Trends and Outcomes of Primary, Rescue, and Adjunct Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematomas

BACKGROUND

Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is an effective minimally invasive treatment for chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs). The authors investigated outcomes of primary, adjunct, and rescue MMAE and primary surgery for the treatment of cSDH using a large-scale national database.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all patients who underwent MMAE and/or surgery to treat cSDH was performed using the TriNetX Analytics Network. Primary MMAE was compared with adjunct and rescue MMAE and primary surgery. Primary outcomes included headache, facial weakness, mortality, and treatment failure, within 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 4274 patients with cSDH met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 209 (4.9%) were treated with primary MMAE, 4050 (94.8%) were treated with primary surgery, 15 (0.35%) were treated using MMAE as an adjunct therapy, and 18 (0.42%) were treated using MMAE as a rescue following a failed surgical intervention. There were no significant differences in headache, facial weakness, and mortality between the groups. Patients who underwent primary MMAE had a significantly higher Charlson comorbidity index (P < 0.0001) than those who underwent primary surgery. The need for surgical rescue was not significantly different between primary MMAE, adjunct MMAE, and rescue MMAE (P > 0.05). Additionally, patients with primary surgery had significantly higher treatment failure than those with primary MMAE (odds ratio = 2.11, 95% confidence interval = 1.11-4.01, P = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests no significant difference in the need for surgical rescue, complication, or mortality between primary MMAE, adjunct MMAE, and rescue MMAE. Additionally, primary MMAE is associated with a significantly lower need for surgical rescue than primary surgery.

Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma in cancer patients with refractory thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVE

Surgical evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma (SDH) in cancer patients is often contraindicated owing to refractory thrombocytopenia. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) recently emerged as a potential alternative to surgical evacuation for patients with chronic SDH. The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MMAE for chronic SDH in cancer patients with refractory thrombocytopenia.

METHODS

A multiinstitutional registry was reviewed for clinical and radiographic outcomes of cancer patients with transfusion-refractory thrombocytopenia and baseline platelet count < 75 K/µl, who underwent MMAE for chronic SDH.

RESULTS

MMAE was performed on a total of 31 SDHs in 22 patients, with a mean ± SD (range) platelet count of 42.1 ± 18.3 (9-74) K/µl. At the longest follow-up, 24 SDHs (77%) had reduced in size, with 15 (48%) showing > 50% reduction. Two patients required surgical evacuation after MMAE. There was only 1 procedural complication; however, 16 patients (73%) ultimately died of cancer-related complications. Median survival was significantly longer in the 16 patients with improved SDH than the 6 patients with worsened SDH after MMAE (185 vs 24 days, p = 0.029). Length of procedure, technical success rate, SDH size reduction, and complication rate were not significantly differ between patients who underwent transfemoral and transradial approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Transfemoral or transradial MMAE is a potential therapeutic option for thrombocytopenic cancer patients with SDH. However, treatment benefit may be marginal for patients with high disease burden and limited life expectancy. A prospective trial is warranted to address these questions.

Efficacy of Neuroendoscopic Treatment for Septated Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Objective: Neuroendoscopic treatment is an alternative therapeutic strategy for the treatment of septate chronic subdural hematoma (sCSDH). However, the safety and efficacy of this strategy remain controversial. We compared the clinical outcomes of neuroendoscopic treatment with those of standard (large bone flap) craniotomy for sCSDH reported in our center. Furthermore, the safety and efficacy of the neuroendoscopic treatment procedure for sCSDH were evaluated. Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 43 patients (37 men and six women) with sCSDH who underwent either neuroendoscopic treatment or standard (large bone flap) craniotomy, such as sex, age, smoking, drinking, medical history, use of antiplatelet drugs, postoperative complications, sCSDH recurrence, length of hospital stay, and postoperative hospital stay. We recorded the surgical procedures and the neurological function recovery prior to surgery and 6 months following the surgical treatment. Results: The enrolled patients were categorized into neuroendoscopic treatment (n = 23) and standard (large bone flap) craniotomy (n = 20) groups. There were no differences in sex, age, smoking, drinking, medical history, antiplatelet drug use, postoperative complications, and sCSDH recurrence between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, the patients in neuroendoscopic treatment group had a shorter length of total hospital stay and postoperative hospital stay as compared with the standard craniotomy group (total hospital stay: 5.26 ± 1.89 vs. 8.15 ± 1.04 days, p < 0.001; postoperative hospital stay: 4.47 ± 1.95 vs. 7.96 ± 0.97 days, p < 0.001). The imaging and Modified Rankin Scale at the 6-month follow-up were satisfactory, and no sCSDH recurrence was reported in the two groups. Conclusions: The findings of this study indicate that neuroendoscopic treatment is safe and effective for sCSDH; it is minimally invasive and could be clinically utilized.

Adjunctive postoperative course of dexamethasone in chronic subdural hematoma: Effect on surgical outcome

Objectives:

To compare the effect of burrhole craniostomy with and without a postoperative course of dexamethasone on recurrence rate of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH).

Methods:

The study was conducted at the Department of Neurosurgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, from September 2017 till May 2018. Adult patients diagnosed with CSDH and advised burrhole craniostomy were enrolled in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized into Group-1 (receiving two weeks dexamethasone), and Group-2 (no dexamethasone). Clinical assessment and Brain CT were done preoperatively, second postoperative day, sixth and twelfth postoperative week, with outcome assessed at twelfth postoperative week. Complications of treatment and recurrence rate were recorded.

Results:

Ninety-two (n=92, 46 in each group) patients were enrolled. Improvement in neurological (95.7% vs 93.5%; P=0.646) and radiological outcome (95.7% vs 93.5%; P=0.646) was similar in both groups. Complication rate was higher in Group-1 but not significantly different (58.7% vs 43.5%; P=0.535). Most frequent complication was pneumocephalus, with mortality rate equal (n=one). Recurrence was observed in 2.2% (n=1/46) patients in Group-1 and 4.3% (n=2/46) in Group-2 (P=0.557), which was not statistically significant.

Conclusions:

Neurological and radiological outcome, and mortality rates were similar in both groups. The recurrence rate was lower and complications slightly higher in Group-1 but these were not statistically significant.

Nationwide trends in middle meningeal artery embolization for treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: A population-based analysis of utilization and short-term outcomes

Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization represents a promising novel treatment modality for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH), yet utilization and efficacy data are limited. This study evaluates the utilization and short-term outcomes of MMA embolization for cSDH treatment in a large national inpatient registry. cSDH patients treated with MMA embolization and/or surgical evacuation (craniotomy/burr hole drainage) were identified using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) during 2012-2018 period. Temporal trends, complications, and discharge disposition were evaluated, and propensity score matching was implemented for adjusted comparisons and to mitigate confounding by indication. Among 60,045 cSDH patients identified, 390 (0.6%) underwent MMA embolization. Embolized patients presented more with high acute illness severity subclasses in comparison with surgically evacuated patients (53% vs. 34%, p = 0.004) yet did not experience any procedure-related hemorrhagic or ischemic complications. Although discharge disposition did not differ from those surgically managed, embolized patients had longer mean hospital stays (13 vs. 8 days, p = 0.023) and accrued greater hospital charges (p < 0.001). Following propensity adjustment, length of stay and charges remained greater in the embolization cohort, yet rates of routine discharge increased appreciably (40% vs. 30%, p = 0.141) relative to surgically treated cSDH patients. The utilization of embolization increased exponentially after 2015, reaching an apex in 2018 (3.7% of treated cSDH). This population-based national assessment demonstrates exponential increases in utilization of MMA embolization for cSDH treatment in recent years. Embolized patients had uncomplicated clinical courses and similar discharge dispositions as surgical evacuation patients. Large-scale prospective trials are warranted to further assess the efficacy of this modality.

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization and the Treatment of a Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common pathology that typically affects the elderly. It is believed to occur due to injury to the dural border cells, which creates an inflammation/proliferation reaction. Ineffective repair leads to the formation of a new external layer of cells and fragile capillaries, which damage easily and can worsen the condition. Conventionally, asymptomatic cSDH is managed by observation, and symptomatic cases are treated by surgical evacuation. Unfortunately, recurrence rates of the SDH following surgical evacuation can be high. One treatment option for SDH involves embolization of the middle meningeal artery (MMA). The MMA provides blood supply to the dura mater and feeds the membrane capillaries covering the SDH. MMA embolization blocks the blood flow to this system and can promote hematoma resolution. In this paper, we review the existing literature on MMA embolization and discuss the underlying pathophysiology of cSDH.

[Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural haematoma. Case series and literature review]

Middle meningeal artery embolization as primary method for treatment of chronic subdural hematomas became more popular in past decade. There are few large case series (>150 patients) and literature reviews characterizing advantages and drawbacks of endovascular treatment and technical features of surgeries. In this manuscript, the authors report 11 patients with chronic subdural hematoma scheduled for middle meningeal artery embolization and review the literature data on this issue.

History and current progress of chronic subdural hematoma

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is characterized by an encapsulated collection of old blood. Although CSDH has become the most frequent pathologic entity in daily neurosurgical practice, there are some unresolved research questions. In particular, the causes and recurrent risk factors of CSDH remain as an object of debate. The split of the dural border layer forms a few tiers of dural border cells over the arachnoid layer. Tissue plasminogen activator plays an important role as a key factor of defective coagulation. Historically, CSDH has often been treated via burr hole craniostomy using a closed drainage system. Several different operative strategies and peri-operative strategies such as the addition of burr holes, addition of cavity irrigation, position of drain, or postural position, have been described previously. Although the direction of the drainage tube, residual air, low intensity of T1-weighted images on MRI, and niveau formation have been reported as risk factors for recurrence, antiplatelet or anticoagulant drug use has not yet been verified as a risk factor. Recently, pharmaceutical strategies, including atorvastatin, significantly improved the neurological function in CSDH patients. Many case series, without randomization, have been reported; and given its promising result, several randomized clinical trials using pharmaceutical as well as operative and perioperative strategies were initiated to obtain sufficient data. In contrast, relatively fewer basic studies have achieved clinical applications in CSDH, although it is one of the most common clinical entities. Further scientific basic research may be essential for achieving a novel treatment strategy for CSDH.

A propensity-adjusted comparison of middle meningeal artery embolization versus conventional therapy for chronic subdural hematomas

OBJECTIVE

Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization is a promising treatment strategy for chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs). However, studies comparing MMA embolization and conventional therapy (surgical intervention and conservative management) are limited. The authors aimed to compare MMA embolization versus conventional therapy for cSDHs using a propensity-adjusted analysis.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all patients with cSDH who presented to a large tertiary center over a 2-year period was performed. MMA embolization was compared with surgical intervention and conservative management. Neurological outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). A propensity-adjusted analysis compared MMA embolization versus surgery and conservative management for all individual cSDHs. Primary outcomes included change in hematoma diameter, treatment failure, and complete resolution at last follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 231 patients with cSDH met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 35 (15%) were treated using MMA embolization, and 196 (85%) were treated with conventional treatment. On the latest follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in the percentage of patients with worsening mRS scores. Of the 323 total cSDHs found in 231 patients, 41 (13%) were treated with MMA embolization, 159 (49%) were treated conservatively, and 123 (38%) were treated with surgical evacuation. After propensity adjustment, both surgery (OR 12, 95% CI 1.5-90; p = 0.02) and conservative therapy (OR 13, 95% CI 1.7-99; p = 0.01) were predictors of treatment failure and incomplete resolution on follow-up imaging (OR 6.1, 95% CI 2.8-13; p < 0.001 and OR 5.4, 95% CI 2.5-12; p < 0.001, respectively) when compared with MMA embolization. Additionally, MMA embolization was associated with a significant decrease in cSDH diameter on follow-up relative to conservative management (mean -8.3 mm, 95% CI -10.4 to -6.3 mm, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This propensity-adjusted analysis suggests that MMA embolization for cSDH is associated with a greater extent of hematoma volume reduction with fewer treatment failures than conventional therapy.

To drill or not to drill, that is the question: nonsurgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma in the elderly. A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical pathologies, typically affecting the elderly. Its incidence is expected to grow along with the aging population. Surgical drainage represents the treatment of choice; however, postoperative complications and the rate of recurrence are not negligible. For this reason, nonsurgical alternatives (such as middle meningeal artery embolization, steroids, or tranexamic acid administration) are gaining popularity worldwide and need to be carefully evaluated, especially in the elderly population.

METHODS

The authors performed a systematic review according to PRISMA criteria of the studies analyzing the nonsurgical strategies for CSDHs. They collected all papers in the English language published between 1990 and 2019 by searching different medical databases. The chosen keywords were "chronic subdural hematoma," "conservative treatment/management," "pharmacological treatment," "non-surgical," "tranexamic acid," "dexamethasone," "corticosteroid," "glucocorticoid," "middle meningeal artery," "endovascular treatment," and "embolization."

RESULTS

The authors ultimately collected 15 articles regarding the pharmacological management of CSDHs matching the criteria, and 14 papers included the endovascular treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that surgery still represents the mainstay in cases of symptomatic patients with large CSDHs; however, adjuvant and alternative therapies can be effective and safe in a carefully selected population. Their inclusion in new guidelines is advisable.

Endovascular Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematomas through Embolization: A Pilot Study with a Non-Adhesive Liquid Embolic Agent of Minimal Viscosity (Squid)

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular embolization using non-adhesive agents (e.g., ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer with suspended micronized tantalum dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide; Squid, Balt Extrusion) is an established treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations, dural arteriovenous fistulas, and hypervascular neoplasms. Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization is a relatively new concept for treating chronic subdural hematomas (CSDH). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the use of Squid in the endovascular treatment of CSDH.

METHODS

Embolization was offered to patients with CSDH with minimal or moderate neurological deficits and patients who had previously undergone open surgery to evacuate their CSDH without a significant effect. Distal catheterization of the MMA was followed by embolization of the hematoma capsule with Squid 12 or Squid 18. Safety endpoints were ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke and any other adverse event of the endovascular procedure. Efficacy endpoints were the feasibility of the intended procedure and a ≥ 50% reduction of the maximum depth of the CSDH confirmed by follow-up computed tomography (CT) after >3 months.

RESULTS

Between November 2019 and July 2021, 10 patients (3 female and 7 male, age range 42-89 years) were enrolled. Five patients had bilateral hematomas, and five patients had previously been operated on with no significant effect and recurrent hematoma formation. The attempted embolization was technically possible in all patients. No technical or clinical complication was encountered. During a post-procedural follow-up (median 90 days), 10 patients improved clinically. A complete resolution of the CSDH was observed in 10 patients. The clinical condition of all enrolled patients during the so-far last contact was rated mRS 0 or 1.

CONCLUSION

A distal catheterization of the MMA for the endovascular embolization of CSDH with Squid allowed for the devascularization of the MMA and the dependent vessels of the hematoma capsule. This procedure resulted in a partial or complete resolution of the CSDH. Procedural complications were not encountered.

Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization has been proposed as a minimally invasive treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare outcomes after MMA embolization versus conventional management for cSDH. We performed a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Oxford Journal, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases from April 1987 to October 2020 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting outcomes after MMA embolization for ≥3 patients with cSDH were included. A meta-analysis comparing MMA embolization with conventional management was performed. The analysis comprised 20 studies with 1416 patients, including 718 and 698 patients in the MMA embolization and conventional management cohorts, respectively. The pooled recurrence, surgical rescue, and in-hospital complication rates in the MMA embolization cohort were 4.8% (95% CI 3.2% to 6.5%), 4.4% (2.8% to 5.9%), and 1.7% (0.8% to 2.6%), respectively. The pooled recurrence, surgical rescue, and in-hospital complication rates in the conventional management cohort were 21.5% (0.6% to 42.4%), 16.4% (5.9% to 27.0%), and 4.9% (2.8% to 7.1%), respectively. Compared with conservative management, MMA embolization was associated with lower rates of cSDH recurrence (OR=0.15 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.75), p=0.02) and surgical rescue (OR=0.21 (0.07 to 0.58), p=0.003). In-hospital complication rates were comparable between the two cohorts (OR=0.78 (0.34 to 1.76), p=0.55). MMA embolization is a promising minimally invasive therapy that may reduce the need for surgical intervention in appropriately selected patients with cSDH. Additional prospective studies are warranted to determine the long-term durability of MMA embolization, refine eligibility criteria, and establish this endovascular approach as a viable definitive treatment for cSDH.

Efficacy and mid-term outcome of middle meningeal artery embolization with or without burr hole evacuation for chronic subdural hematoma compared with burr hole evacuation alone

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common neurosurgical condition with high recurrence rates. Repeated microbleedings from fragile neo-vessels supplied by peripheral branches of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) are believed to be responsible for the growth and recurrence of CSDH. Thus, MMA embolization might be a promising method to prevent re-bleedings and recurrences. This study aims to assess the efficacy, complication rates, and mid-term outcome of MMA embolization with or without burr hole irrigation compared with burr hole irrigation alone.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with CSDH who underwent MMA embolization and/or surgical treatment were retrospectively recruited to this single-center study. The outcome variables were defined as treatment-related complications, clinical outcome at discharge, rate of revision surgery, and CT findings during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients with CSDH were included in the study. The use of antiplatelet/anticoagulant medication was significantly higher in the combined treatment and embolization group (p<0.001). A trend towards fewer revision surgeries was found in the group of patients who received MMA embolization combined with burr hole irrigation (p=0.083). Follow-up was available for 73 patients (55.3%) with a mean follow-up period of 3.4±2.2 months. Eight patients (15.1%) of the surgery group showed hematoma re-accumulation and needed surgical rescue, whereas only one patient (5.0%) of the combined treatment group needed revision surgery. In all patients treated with only MMA embolization, complete hematoma resolution was found.

CONCLUSION

MMA embolization is a safe and efficacious minimal invasive adjuvant and/or alternative procedure for the treatment of CSDH with a reduced recurrence rate.

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A National Database Study of 191 Patients in the United States

BACKGROUND

Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has been used as an effective minimally invasive treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). The demographics and clinical outcomes after MMAE treatment for cSDH have not yet been studied using a national database.

METHODS

We queried all MMAE cases up to October 7, 2020, from the TriNetX Analytics Network. We identified patients >18 years old who underwent MMAE for treatment of cSDH. Patient demographics, baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes were evaluated within 180 days after MMAE. Analyses of 180-day mortality and recurrence were performed after propensity score matching to control for baseline characteristics and comorbidities.

RESULTS

The study included 191 patients (mean age 71.2 ± 13.5 years, 73.3% male, 69.6% White, 13.6% Black/African American, and 16.8% other race). Essential hypertension (71.3%), heart disease (62.8%), type 2 diabetes mellitus (27.2%), nicotine dependence (23.6%), chronic kidney disease (19.4%), and overweight/obesity (19.4%) were among the most prevalent comorbidities. At presentation, 20.4% and 40.3% of patients were on antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy, respectively. Outcomes within 180-day follow-up were 6.3% (1.0%-5.8% when propensity matched) for mortality (12 patients), 7.3% for craniotomy/craniectomy after MMAE (14 patients), 0.52%-5.2% for burr hole procedures (1-10 patients), and no patients with low vision/blindness.

CONCLUSIONS

MMAE is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure for treatment of cSDH. This is the first analysis of patients undergoing MMAE for cSDH using a national database.

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization Versus Conventional Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematomas

BACKGROUND

Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization is an emerging minimally invasive endovascular technique for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). Currently, limited literature exists on its safety and efficacy compared with conventional treatment (open-surgical-evacuation-only).

OBJECTIVE

To compare MMA embolization to conventional treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with cSDHs treated with MMA embolization in a single center from 2018 to 2019 was performed. Comparisons were made with a historical conventional treatment cohort from 2006 to 2016. Propensity score matching analysis was used to assemble a balanced group of subjects.

RESULTS

A total of 357 conventionally treated cSDH and 45 with MMA embolization were included. After balancing with propensity score matching, a total of 25 pairs of cSDH were analyzed. Comparing the embolization with the conventional treatment group yielded no significant differences in complications (4% vs 4%; P > .99), clinical improvement (82.6% vs 83.3%; P = .95), cSDH recurrence (4.3% vs 21.7%; P = .08), overall re-intervention rates (12% vs 24%; P = .26), modified Rankin scale >2 on last follow-up (17.4% vs 32%; P = .24), as well as mortality (0% vs 12%; P = .09). Radiographic improvement at last follow-up was significantly higher in the open surgery cohort (73.9% vs 95.6%; P = .04). However, there was a trend for lengthier last follow-up for the historical cohort (72 vs 104 d; P = .07).

CONCLUSION

There was a trend for lower recurrence and mortality rates in the embolization era cohort. There were significantly higher radiological improvement rates on last follow-up in the surgical only cohort era. There were no significant differences in complications and clinical improvement.

The Mini-Craniotomy for cSDH Revisited: New Perspectives

Background: Chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) are increasingly prevalent worldwide with the increased aging population and anticoagulant use. Different surgical, medical, and endovascular treatments have had varying success rates. Primary neurosurgical interventions include burr hole drainage of the cSDH and mini-craniotomies/craniotomies with or without fenestration of the inner membrane. A key assessment of the success or failure of cSDH treatments has been symptomatic recurrence rates which have historically ranged from 5 to 30%. Pre-operative prediction of the inner subdural membrane by CT scan was used to guide our decision to perform mini-craniotomies. Release of the inner membrane facilitates the expansion of the brain and likely improves glymphatic flow.

Methods: Consecutive mini-craniotomies (N = 34) for cSDH evacuation performed by a single neurosurgeon at a quaternary academic medical center/Level I trauma center from July 2018-September 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics [age, gender, presenting GCS, GOS, initial CTs noting the inner subdural membrane, midline shift (MLS), cSDH width, inner membrane fenestration, cSDH recurrence, post-operative seizures, infections, length of stay] were extracted from the EMR.

Results: Twenty nine patients had mini-craniotomies as primary treatment of the cSDH. Mean age = 68.9 ± 19.7 years (range 22–102), mean pre-operative GCS = 14.5 ± 1.1, mean MLS = 6.75 ± 4.2 mm, and mean maximum thickness of cSDH = 17.7 ± 6.0 mm. Twenty four were unilateral, five bilateral, 34 total craniotomies were performed. Thirty three had inner membrane signs on pre-operative head CTs and an inner subdural membrane was fenestrated in all cases except for the one craniotomy that didn't show these characteristic CT findings. Mean operating time = 79.5 ± 26.0 min. Radiographic and clinical improvement occurred in all patients. Mean improvement in MLS = 3.85 ± 2.69. There were no symptomatic recurrences, re-operations, surgical site infections, or deaths during the 6 months of follow-up. One patient was treated for post-operative seizures with AEDs for 6 months.

Conclusion: Pre-operative CT scans demonstrating inner subdural membranes may guide one to target the treatment to allow release of this tension band. Mini-craniotomy with careful fenestration of the inner membrane is very effective for this. Brain re-expansion and re-establishment of normal brain interstitial flow may be important in long term outcomes with cSDH and may be related to the recent interests in brain glymphatics and dural lymphatics.

Middle meningeal artery embolization with subdural evacuating port system for primary management of chronic subdural hematomas

Optimal treatment for chronic subdural hematomas remains controversial and perioperative risks and comorbidities may affect management strategies. Minimally invasive procedures are emerging as alternatives to the standard operative treatments. We evaluate our experience with middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization combined with Subdural Evacuating Port System (SEPS) placement as a first-line treatment for patients with cSDH. A single institution retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing intervention. Patients were stratified by treatment with MMA embolization and SEPS placement, MMA embolization and surgery, SEPS placement only, and surgery only for cSDH from 2017 to 2020, and cohorts were compared against each other. Patients treated with MMA/SEPS were more likely to be older, be on anticoagulation, have significant comorbidities, have shorter length of stay, and less likely to have symptomatic recurrence compared to SEPS only cohort. Thus, MMA/SEPS appears to be a safe and equally effective minimally invasive treatment for cSDH patients with significant comorbidities who are poor surgical candidates.

Modified Computed Tomography Classification for Chronic Subdural Hematoma Features Good Interrater Agreement: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to establish whether our modified Nakaguchi computed tomography (CT) classification improves the interrater agreement of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) classification and prediction of CSDH recurrence relative to 2 other CT classifications.

METHODS

This retrospective study considered 277 consecutive patients with CSDH and 307 hematomas treated with burr-hole surgery between January 2009 and December 2018. Two neurosurgeons blinded to patients' clinical data classified the CT scans of patients with CSDH into 4 or 5 types according to the Nomura classification (high, iso, low, mixed, and layering), Nakaguchi classification (homogenous, laminar, separated, and trabecular), and our modified Nakaguchi classification (homogenous, gradation, laminar, separated, and trabecular). The κ statistic was used to evaluate the interrater agreement of the 3 CT classifications. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to calculate odds ratios for CSDH recurrence.

RESULTS

κ values of the modified, Nakaguchi, and Nomura classification were 0.78, 0.63, and 0.70, respectively. During the 3 months follow-up, the recurrence rate for CSDH was 11.4% (35/307 hematomas). Of the types defined by the modified classification, the gradation type was associated with the highest recurrence (mean recurrence rate, 15.9% ± 0.3%). Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that a gradation-type hematoma, as defined with the modified classification, was an independent risk factor associated with recurrence (odds ratio, 2.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-4.98; P = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified classification was useful for preoperative CT classification of CSDH and the prediction of recurrence, with high agreement between raters.

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Multi-Center Experience of 154 Consecutive Embolizations

BACKGROUND

Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization has emerged as a promising treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and efficacy of MMA embolization.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent MMA embolization for cSDH (primary treatment or recurrence after conventional surgery) at 15 centers were included. Clinical details and follow-up were collected prospectively. Primary clinical and radiographic outcomes were the proportion of patients requiring additional surgical treatment within 90 d after index treatment and proportion with > 50% cSDH thickness reduction on follow-up computed tomography imaging within 90 d. National Institute of Health Stroke Scale and modified Rankin Scale were also clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients were included (mean age: 69.8, 29% female). A total of 15 patients underwent bilateral interventions for 154 total embolizations (66.7% primary treatment). At presentation, 30.4% and 23.9% of patients were on antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy, respectively. Median admission cSDH thickness was 14 mm. A total of 46.1% of embolizations were performed under general anesthesia, and 97.4% of procedures were successfully completed. A total of 70.2% of embolizations used particles, and 25.3% used liquid embolics with no significant outcome difference between embolization materials (P > .05). On last follow-up (mean 94.9 d), median cSDH thickness was 4 mm (71% median thickness reduction). A total of 70.8% of patients had >50% improvement on imaging (31.9% improved clinically), and 9 patients (6.5%) required further cSDH treatment. There were 16 complications with 9 (6.5%) because of continued hematoma expansion. Mortality rate was 4.4%, mostly unrelated to the index procedure but because of underlying comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

MMA embolization may provide a safe and efficacious minimally invasive alternative to conventional surgical techniques.

CTA-Based Patient-Tailored Femoral or Radial Frontline Access Reduces the Rate of Catheterization Failure in Chronic Subdural Hematoma Embolization

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Chronic subdural hematoma embolization, an apparently simple procedure, can prove to be challenging because of the advanced age of the target population. The aim of this study was to compare 2 arterial-access strategies, femoral versus patient-tailored CTA-based frontline access selection, in chronic subdural hematoma embolization procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a monocentric retrospective study. From the March 15, 2018, to the February 14, 2019 (period 1), frontline femoral access was used. Between February 15, 2019, and March 30, 2020 (period 2), the choice of the frontline access, femoral or radial, was based on the CTA recommended as part of the preoperative work-up during both above-mentioned periods. The primary end point was the rate of catheterization failure. The secondary end points were the rate of access site conversion and fluoroscopy duration.

RESULTS

During the study period, 124 patients (with 143 chronic subdural hematomas) underwent an embolization procedure (mean age, 74 [SD, 13] years). Forty-eight chronic subdural hematomas (43 patients) were included during period 1 and were compared with 95 chronic subdural hematomas (81 patients) during period 2. During the first period, 5/48 (10%) chronic subdural hematoma embolizations were aborted due to failed catheterization, significantly more than during period 2 (1/95, 1%; P = .009). The rates of femoral-to-radial (P = .55) and total conversion (P = .86) did not differ between the 2 periods. No significant difference was found regarding the duration of fluoroscopy (P = .62).

CONCLUSIONS

A CTA-based patient-tailored choice of frontline arterial access reduces the rate of catheterization failure in chronic subdural hematoma embolization procedures.

Surgical Procedure in the Treatment of Organized Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Organized chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a special type of CSDH. However, the optimal surgical procedure has not been established. We present our experience here to discuss the surgical procedure in treatment of organized CSDH.

METHODS

 Thirty-three patients with organized CSDH were admitted between January 1, 2008 and January 1, 2018. Age, gender, clinical symptoms, imaging data, type of surgical procedure, Barthel index (BI), and postoperative complications were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The BI was assessed both pre and postoperatively (1 week and 1 month after surgery).

RESULTS

 Overall, 14 patients underwent large craniotomy and 19 patients underwent small craniotomy. No significant differences in gender, age, initial clinical symptoms, and preoperative BI were found between the groups (p > 0.05). Among the 14 patients who underwent large craniotomy, 2 patients developed epilepsy after the operation, while 1 patient had postoperative aphasia. None of the patients had recurrence in 6 months postoperatively. Among the 19 patients who underwent small craniotomy, 1 patient developed an acute subdural hematoma and 1 patient developed aphasia. No obvious complications were found in the remaining 18 patients and none of the 19 patients had recurrence in 6 months postoperatively. BI scores of the small craniotomy group were significantly better than those of the large craniotomy group at 1 week postoperatively (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the 1-month results (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

 According to our single-center experience, a small craniotomy for treating organized CSDH can be considered as an alternative to a larger craniotomy.

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common disease process associated with significant morbidity that occurs most often in elderly patients. Asymptomatic patients are typically treated conservatively, with surgical intervention reserved for patients with symptomatic and/or large hematomas that cause brain compression. However, conservatively managed cSDH cases frequently progress, and surgical evacuation of cSDH is associated with high rates of complication and recurrence. Recently, successful treatment of cSDH via middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization has been reported in small case series and case reports. This article reviews the existing literature on MMA embolization for cSDH and discusses the need for randomized control trials and/or large prospective studies to establish the efficacy of MMA embolization for this disease.