1
|
Do papers (really) match journals’ “aims and scope”? A computational assessment of innovation studies. Scientometrics 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04327-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
2
|
Sui GL, Yao B. Quantitative assessment of academic value and demand of journals and determination of core journals for a discipline. LIBRARY MANAGEMENT 2019. [DOI: 10.1108/lm-02-2019-0008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to propose an approach of quantitative assessment of academic value and demand of journals for a discipline.
Design/methodology/approach
This study defines relative citation rate (RCR) and utilization rate (UR) of journals cited by a discipline with a case of inorganic chemistry discipline in Jilin University, ranks the journals in decreasing order of RCR and UR, and analyzes the RCR and UR curves with mathematical statistics and physics.
Findings
The RCR and UR curves can be expressed as: RCR(n)=N1exp(−n/t(N1))+N2exp(−n/t(N2))=64.54exp(−n/1.98)+31.14exp(−n/23.11) and UR(n)=Y1exp(−n/t(Y1))+Y2exp(−n/t(Y2))=85.06exp(−n/108.6)+12.94exp(−n/705.8). The parameters t(N1), t(N2), t(Y1) and t(Y2) can be used to assess quantitatively academica value and demand of journal for a discipline and to determine core journals of the discipline.
Research limitations/implications
This approach is used to quantitatively assess academic value and demand of journals for a discipline.
Practical implications
This approach may provide useful information for journal management of library.
Originality/value
The present work is original.
Collapse
|
3
|
Building journal’s long-term impact: using indicators detected from the sustained active articles. Scientometrics 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03196-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
4
|
Walters WH. Do subjective journal ratings represent whole journals or typical articles? Unweighted or weighted citation impact? J Informetr 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
5
|
Ryan Haley M. On the normalization and distributional adjustment of journal ranking metrics: A simple parametric approach. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/asi.23663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M. Ryan Haley
- Department of Economics; University of Wisconsin Oshkosh; Oshkosh WI 54901
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Does an expert-based evaluation allow us to go beyond the Impact Factor? Experiences from building a ranking of national journals in Poland. Scientometrics 2017; 111:417-442. [PMID: 28386153 PMCID: PMC5362673 DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2261-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2016] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
This article discusses the Polish Journal Ranking, which is used in the research evaluation system in Poland. In 2015, the ranking, which represents all disciplines, allocated 17,437 journals into three lists: A, B, and C. The B list constitutes a ranking of Polish journals that are indexed neither in the Web of Science nor the European Reference Index for the Humanities. This ranking was built by evaluating journals in three dimensions: formal, bibliometric, and expert-based. We have analysed data on 2035 Polish journals from the B list. Our study aims to determine how an expert-based evaluation influenced the results of final evaluation. In our study, we used structural equation modelling, which is regression based, and we designed three pairs of theoretical models for three fields of science: (1) humanities, (2) social sciences, and (3) engineering, natural sciences, and medical sciences. Each pair consisted of the full model and the reduced model (i.e., the model without the expert-based evaluation). Our analysis revealed that the multidimensional evaluation of local journals should not rely only on the bibliometric indicators, which are based on the Web of Science or Scopus. Moreover, we have shown that the expert-based evaluation plays a major role in all fields of science. We conclude with recommendations that the formal evaluation should be reduced to verifiable parameters and that the expert-based evaluation should be based on common guidelines for the experts.
Collapse
|
7
|
Bertoli-Barsotti L, Lando T. A theoretical model of the relationship between the h-index and other simple citation indicators. Scientometrics 2017; 111:1415-1448. [PMID: 28596626 PMCID: PMC5438441 DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2351-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Of the existing theoretical formulas for the h-index, those recently suggested by Burrell (J Informetr 7:774-783, 2013b) and by Bertoli-Barsotti and Lando (J Informetr 9(4):762-776, 2015) have proved very effective in estimating the actual value of the h-index Hirsch (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:16569-16572, 2005), at least at the level of the individual scientist. These approaches lead (or may lead) to two slightly different formulas, being based, respectively, on a "standard" and a "shifted" version of the geometric distribution. In this paper, we review the genesis of these two formulas-which we shall call the "basic" and "improved" Lambert-W formula for the h-index-and compare their effectiveness with that of a number of instances taken from the well-known Glänzel-Schubert class of models for the h-index (based, instead, on a Paretian model) by means of an empirical study. All the formulas considered in the comparison are "ready-to-use", i.e., functions of simple citation indicators such as: the total number of publications; the total number of citations; the total number of cited paper; the number of citations of the most cited paper. The empirical study is based on citation data obtained from two different sets of journals belonging to two different scientific fields: more specifically, 231 journals from the area of "Statistics and Mathematical Methods" and 100 journals from the area of "Economics, Econometrics and Finance", totaling almost 100,000 and 20,000 publications, respectively. The citation data refer to different publication/citation time windows, different types of "citable" documents, and alternative approaches to the analysis of the citation process ("prospective" and "retrospective"). We conclude that, especially in its improved version, the Lambert-W formula for the h-index provides a quite robust and effective ready-to-use rule that should be preferred to other known formulas if one's goal is (simply) to derive a reliable estimate of the h-index.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucio Bertoli-Barsotti
- Department of Management, Economics and Quantitative Methods, University of Bergamo, via dei Caniana 2, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Tommaso Lando
- Department of Management, Economics and Quantitative Methods, University of Bergamo, via dei Caniana 2, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
- Department of Finance, VŠB -TU Ostrava, Sokolskà 33, 70121 Ostrava, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shen CC, Hu YH, Lin WC, Tsai CF, Ke SW. Research impact of general and funded papers. ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW 2016. [DOI: 10.1108/oir-08-2015-0249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to focus on examining the research impact of papers written with and without funding. Specifically, the citation analysis method is used to compare the general and funded papers published in two leading international conferences, which are ACM SIGIR and ACM SIGKDD.
Design/methodology/approach
– The authors investigate the number of general and funded papers to see whether the number of funded papers is larger than the number of general papers. In addition, the total citations and the number of highly cited papers with and without funding are also compared.
Findings
– The analysis results of ACM SIGIR papers show that in most cases the number of funded papers is larger than the number of general papers. Moreover, the total captions, the average number of citations per paper, and the number of highly cited papers all reveal the superiority of funded papers over general papers. However, the findings are somewhat different for the ACM SIGKDD papers. This may be because ACM SIGIR began much earlier than ACM SIGKDD, which relates to the maturity of the research problems addressed in these two conferences.
Originality/value
– The value of this paper is the first attempt at examining the research impact of general and funded research papers by the citation analysis method. The research impact of other research areas can be further investigated by other analysis methods.
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
Abstract
Purpose
– Although journal rankings are important for authors, readers, publishers, promotion, and tenure committees, it has been argued that the use of different measures (e.g. the journal impact factor (JIF), and Hirsch’s h-index) often lead to different journal rankings, which render it difficult to make an appropriate decision. A hybrid ranking method based on the Borda count approach, the Standardized Average Index (SA index), was introduced to solve this problem. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach
– Citations received by the articles published in 85 Health Care Sciences and Services (HCSS) journals in the period of 2009-2013 were analyzed with the use of the JIF, the h-index, and the SA index.
Findings
– The SA index exhibits a high correlation with the JIF and the h-index (γ
>
0.9, p
<
0.01) and yields results with higher accuracy than the h-index. The new, comprehensive citation impact analysis of the 85 HCSS journals shows that the SA index can help researchers to find journals with both high JIFs and high h-indices more easily, thereby harvesting references for paper submissions and research directions.
Originality/value
– The contribution of this study is the application of the Borda count approach to combine the HCSS journal rankings produced by the two widely accepted indices of the JIF and the h-index. The new HCSS journal rankings can be used by publishers, journal editors, researchers, policymakers, librarians, and practitioners as a reference for journal selection and the establishment of decisions and professional judgment.
Collapse
|
11
|
Ennas G, Biggio B, Di Guardo MC. Data-driven journal meta-ranking in business and management. Scientometrics 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1751-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
12
|
Liu XL, Gai SS, Zhang SL, Wang P. An Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Scores and Impact Factors with Different Citation Time Windows: A Case Study of 28 Ophthalmologic Journals. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0135583. [PMID: 26295157 PMCID: PMC4546661 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2015] [Accepted: 07/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An important attribute of the traditional impact factor was the controversial 2-year citation window. So far, several scholars have proposed using different citation time windows for evaluating journals. However, there is no confirmation whether a longer citation time window would be better. How did the journal evaluation effects of 3IF, 4IF, and 6IF comparing with 2IF and 5IF? In order to understand these questions, we made a comparative study of impact factors with different citation time windows with the peer-reviewed scores of ophthalmologic journals indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) database. METHODS The peer-reviewed scores of 28 ophthalmologic journals were obtained through a self-designed survey questionnaire. Impact factors with different citation time windows (including 2IF, 3IF, 4IF, 5IF, and 6IF) of 28 ophthalmologic journals were computed and compared in accordance with each impact factor's definition and formula, using the citation analysis function of the Web of Science (WoS) database. An analysis of the correlation between impact factors with different citation time windows and peer-reviewed scores was carried out. RESULTS Although impact factor values with different citation time windows were different, there was a high level of correlation between them when it came to evaluating journals. In the current study, for ophthalmologic journals' impact factors with different time windows in 2013, 3IF and 4IF seemed the ideal ranges for comparison, when assessed in relation to peer-reviewed scores. In addition, the 3-year and 4-year windows were quite consistent with the cited peak age of documents published by ophthalmologic journals. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS Our study is based on ophthalmology journals and we only analyze the impact factors with different citation time window in 2013, so it has yet to be ascertained whether other disciplines (especially those with a later cited peak) or other years would follow the same or similar patterns. ORIGINALITY/ VALUE We designed the survey questionnaire ourselves, specifically to assess the real influence of journals. We used peer-reviewed scores to judge the journal evaluation effect of impact factors with different citation time windows. The main purpose of this study was to help researchers better understand the role of impact factors with different citation time windows in journal evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue-Li Liu
- Periodicals Publishing House, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan Province, China
- Henan Research Center for Science Journals, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan Province, China
- * E-mail:
| | - Shuang-Shuang Gai
- Henan Research Center for Science Journals, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan Province, China
| | - Shi-Le Zhang
- Henan Research Center for Science Journals, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan Province, China
| | - Pu Wang
- Xiamen University Tan Kan Kee College Library, Zhangzhou, Fujian Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wan X, Liu F. WL-index: Leveraging citation mention number to quantify an individual's scientific impact. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 2014. [DOI: 10.1002/asi.23151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaojun Wan
- Institute of Computer Science and Technology; the MOE Key Laboratory of Computational Linguistics; Peking University; Beijing China
| | - Fang Liu
- Institute of Computer Science and Technology; the MOE Key Laboratory of Computational Linguistics; Peking University; Beijing China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tsai CF. Citation impact analysis of top ranked computer science journals and their rankings. J Informetr 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
15
|
A proposal for a novel impact factor as an alternative to the JCR impact factor. Sci Rep 2013; 3:3410. [PMID: 24296521 PMCID: PMC3847704 DOI: 10.1038/srep03410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2013] [Accepted: 11/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
One disadvantage of the JCR impact factor, the most commonly used assessment tool for ranking and evaluating scientific journals, is its inability in distinguishing among different shapes of citation distribution curves, leading to unfair evaluation of journals in some cases. This paper aims to put forward an alternative impact factor (IF′) that can properly reflect citation distributions. The two impact factors are linearly and positively correlated, and have roughly the same order of magnitude. Because of the ability of IF′ in distinguishing among different shapes of citation distribution curves, IF′ may properly reflect the academic performance of a scientific journal in a way that is different from the JCR impact factor with some unique features that reward journals with highly cited papers. Therefore, it is suggested that IF′ could be used to complement the JCR impact factor.
Collapse
|
16
|
Bojović S, Matić R, Popović Z, Smiljanić M, Stefanović M, Vidaković V. An overview of forestry journals in the period 2006–2010 as basis for ascertaining research trends. Scientometrics 2013. [DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1171-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
17
|
The suitability of h and g indexes for measuring the research performance of institutions. Scientometrics 2013. [DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1026-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
18
|
Abramo G, D'Angelo CA, Viel F. Assessing the accuracy of the h- and g-indexes for measuring researchers' productivity. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/asi.22828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Abramo
- Institute for System Analysis and Computer Science-National Research Council of Italy (IASI-CNR); Laboratory for Studies of Research and Technology Transfer; University of Rome “Tor Vergata,”; School of Engineering Via del Politecnico 1; 00133; Rome; Italy
| | - Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo
- Laboratory for Studies of Research and Technology Transfer; University of Rome “Tor Vergata,”; School of Engineering Via del Politecnico 1; 00133; Rome; Italy
| | - Fulvio Viel
- Laboratory for Studies of Research and Technology Transfer; University of Rome “Tor Vergata,”; School of Engineering Via del Politecnico 1; 00133; Rome; Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Petridis K, Malesios C, Arabatzis G, Thanassoulis E. Efficiency analysis of forestry journals: Suggestions for improving journals’ quality. J Informetr 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
20
|
Romero-Torres M, Acosta-Moreno LA, Tejada-Gómez MA. Ranking de revistas científicas en Latinoamérica mediante el índice h: estudio de caso Colombia. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DOCUMENTACION CIENTIFICA 2013. [DOI: 10.3989/redc.2013.1.876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
21
|
Jacsó P. Using Google Scholar for journal impact factors and the h‐index in nationwide publishing assessments in academia – siren songs and air‐raid sirens. ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW 2012. [DOI: 10.1108/14684521211241503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
22
|
Grim tales about the impact factor and the h-index in the Web of Science and the Journal Citation Reports databases: reflections on Vanclay’s criticism. Scientometrics 2012. [DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0769-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
23
|
Vinkler P. The Garfield impact factor, one of the fundamental indicators in scientometrics. Scientometrics 2012. [DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0688-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
24
|
Vanclay JK, Bornmann L. Metrics to evaluate research performance in academic institutions: a critique of ERA 2010 as applied in forestry and the indirect H2 index as a possible alternative. Scientometrics 2012. [DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0618-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
25
|
|
26
|
Vanclay JK. Publication patterns of award-winning forest scientists and implications for the Australian ERA journal ranking. J Informetr 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2011.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
27
|
|
28
|
Serenko A, Dohan M. Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: Example from the field of Artificial Intelligence. J Informetr 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2011.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
29
|
Huang MH, Lin WYC. Probing the effect of author self-citations on h index: A case study of environmental engineering. J Inf Sci 2011. [DOI: 10.1177/0165551511412027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
This study evaluates the impact of author self-citations on h index by exploring 583 authors whose works appear in key periodicals in environmental engineering. The findings show that authors’ h values have high correlation with authors’ article number, total cited count, and their rankings. There is also a high correlation with h index values and rankings of h values. The study indicates that self-citations have little impact on the values of h index and the h index rankings, whether or not articles with authors’ self-citation are included. Further investigations reveal that, for authors with high values in h index, the two h index values are both highly correlated and with significant difference either with self-citations or without. A similar pattern is seen in authors with low h values. The results suggest that there is no need to deliberately exclude self-citations in analysing or evaluating research performance in environmental engineering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mu-Hsuan Huang
- Department of Library and Information Science, National Taiwan University, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Yau Cathy Lin
- Department of Information and Library Science, Tamkang University, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
|
31
|
Norris M, Oppenheim C. Theh‐index: a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator. JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION 2010. [DOI: 10.1108/00220411011066790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
32
|
Bador P, Lafouge T. [Comparative analysis of impact factor and h-index for pharmacology journals]. Therapie 2010; 65:129-37. [PMID: 20478245 DOI: 10.2515/therapie/2009061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2009] [Accepted: 10/09/2009] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Using the strictly same parameters (identical two publication years (2004-2005) and identical one-year citation window (2006)), impact factor (IF) 2006 was compared with h-index 2006 for one sample of "pharmacology and pharmacy" journals computed from the ISI Web of Science. For this sample, the IF and the h-index rankings of the journals are very different. The correlation coefficient between the IF and the h-index is low for "pharmacology and pharmacy" journals. The IF and h-index can be completely complementary when evaluating journals of the same scientific discipline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Bador
- Université de Lyon 1, Equipe ELICO, ISPB, Faculté de Pharmacie, Lyon, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Boell SK, Wilson CS. Journal Impact Factors for evaluating scientific performance: use of h-like indicators. Scientometrics 2010. [DOI: 10.1007/s11192-010-0175-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
34
|
Cabrerizo F, Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. q2-Index: Quantitative and qualitative evaluation based on the number and impact of papers in the Hirsch core. J Informetr 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2009.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
35
|
|
36
|
Egghe L, Liang L, Rousseau R. A relation between h-index and impact factor in the power-law model. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2009. [DOI: 10.1002/asi.21144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
37
|
Alonso S, Cabrerizo F, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. J Informetr 2009. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 492] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
38
|
Comparative analysis between impact factor and h-index for pharmacology and psychiatry journals. Scientometrics 2009. [DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0058-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
39
|
Haddow G, Genoni P. Australian Education Journals: Quantitative and Qualitative Indicators. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2009. [DOI: 10.1080/00048623.2009.10721388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
40
|
Bornmann L, Marx W, Schier H. Hirsch-Type Index Values for Organic Chemistry Journals: A Comparison of New Metrics with the Journal Impact Factor. European J Org Chem 2009. [DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.200801243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|