Racial Disparities in Complications, Length of Stay, and Costs Among Patients Receiving Orthognathic Surgery in the United States

Surgical Outcomes for Patients With Trisomy 21 and Hirschsprung's Disease: An NSQIP-Pediatric Study

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have demonstrated worse outcomes for Hirschsprung's disease (HD) procedures in Trisomy 21 (T21) patients. Using a large national database, we sought to investigate surgical outcomes in HD patients with T21 compared to non-T21 patients.

METHODS

We utilized the deidentified National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database from 2012 to 2021. Using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes, children <18 y old with HD were included and stratified by T21 diagnosis. Demographics, Current Procedural Terminology codes, case characteristics, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 3456 HD patients, 12.0% (n = 413) patients had a concurrent diagnosis of T21. Pull-through (PT) procedures accounted for 54.9% of surgeries (n = 1896), of which 10.0% (n = 189) had T21. T21 patients who underwent PT had a younger gestational age (P < 0.0001), cardiac risk factors (P < 0.0001), hematologic disorders (P < 0.0001), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P < 0.0001), and were older at their index operation (P = 0.03). Though operative times were similar, T21 patients had a longer total length of stay (P = 0.0263), postoperative length of stay (P = 0.0033), and more unplanned reoperations (P = 0.0094). Though only significant in unadjusted analyses, T21 patients had more postoperative complications after PT (P = 0.0034), specifically deep surgical site infections (P = 0.009), organ/space surgical site infections (P = 0.004), wound disruption (P < 0.001), and sepsis (P = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

We confirm significant differences exist between T21 and non-T21 patients undergoing HD procedures, particularly increased total length of stay, postoperative length of stay, and unplanned reoperations. Understanding these differences will lead to more optimal treatment plans for this unique patient population.

A New Method to Design and Manufacture a Low-Cost Custom-Made Template for Mandible Cut and Repositioning Using Standard Plates in BSSO Surgery

In this study, a new methodology for designing and creating a custom-made template for maxillofacial surgery has been developed. The custom-made template can be used both for cutting and repositioning of the mandible arches for executing a BSSO (bilateral sagittal split osteotomy) treatment. The idea was developed in order to give the possibility of using a custom-made template with standard plates, thus reducing long times, high costs and low availability of custom-made plates; this represents the proof of novelty of the proposed template, based on a well-established methodology. The methodology was completely developed in the CAD virtual environment and, after the surgeons' assessment, an in-vitro experiment by a maxillofacial surgeon was performed in order to check the usability and the versatility of the system, thanks to the use of additive manufacturing technologies. When computer-aided technologies are used for orthognathic surgery, there are significant time and cost savings that can be realised, as well as improved performance. The cost of the whole operation is lower than the standard one, thanks to the use of standard plates. To carry out the procedures, the proposed methodology allows for inexpensive physical mock-ups that enable the BSSO procedure to be performed.

Incomes to Outcomes: A Global Assessment of Disparities in Cleft and Craniofacial Treatment

OBJECTIVE

Recent investigations focused on health equity have enumerated widespread disparities in cleft and craniofacial care. This review introduces a structured framework to aggregate findings and direct future research.

DESIGN

Systematic review was performed to identify studies assessing health disparities based on race/ethnicity, payor type, income, geography, and education in cleft and craniofacial surgery in high-income countries (HICs) and low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Case reports and systematic reviews were excluded. Meta-analysis was conducted using fixed-effect models for disparities described in three or more studies.

SETTING

N/A.

PATIENTS

Patients with cleft lip/palate, craniosynostosis, craniofacial syndromes, and craniofacial trauma.

INTERVENTIONS

N/A.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-seven articles were included (80% cleft, 20% craniofacial; 48% HIC-based). Studies in HICs predominantly described disparities (77%,) and in LMICs focused on reducing disparities (42%). Level II-IV evidence replicated delays in cleft repair, alveolar bone grafting, and cranial vault remodeling for non-White and publicly insured patients in HICs (Grades A-B). Grade B-D evidence from LMICs suggested efficacy of community-based speech therapy and remote patient navigation programs. Meta-analysis demonstrated that Black patients underwent craniosynostosis surgery 2.8 months later than White patients (P < .001) and were less likely to undergo minimally-invasive surgery (OR 0.36, P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Delays in cleft and craniofacial surgical treatment are consistently identified with high-level evidence among non-White and publicly-insured families in HICs. Multiple tactics to facilitate patient access and adapt multi-disciplinary case in austere settings are reported from LMICs. Future efforts including those sharing tactics among HICs and LMICs hold promise to help mitigate barriers to care.

The impact of race and ethnicity in outpatient breast reconstruction decision-making and postoperative outcomes: A propensity score-matched NSQIP analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent literature has established outpatient breast reconstruction (BR) to be a safe alternative to inpatient BR. However, the impact of race and ethnicity on BR patient decision-making and postsurgical outcomes remains unexplored. This study aims to assess the impact of race and ethnicity on outpatient BR timing and postoperative complication rates.

METHODS

The 2013-2020 ACS-NSQIP database was utilized to identify women undergoing outpatient BR. Propensity score-matched analysis was conducted to generate balanced cohorts based on race and ethnicity. t-tests and Fisher's exact tests were used to assess group differences. Logistic regressions were modeled to evaluate differences in complications between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 63,526 patients underwent outpatient BR. After propensity score matching, 7664 patients and 3948 patients were included in the race and ethnicity-based analysis, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in the timing of BR patients received across cohorts. NW patients had lower rates of immediate BR (IBR) compared with White patients (47% vs. 53%, p < 0.001), and this also was seen in Hispanic patients (97% vs. 3%, p = 0.018). Subsequently, there were higher rates of delayed BR (DBR) in the NW cohort (55% vs. 45%, p < 0.001) and in the Hispanic cohort (95% vs. 5%, p = 0.018). There were no significant differences in the rates of 30-day postoperative complications across cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultimately, our findings suggest that minority patients are more likely to undergo DBR than nonminority patients. However, there were no differences in 30-day postoperative outcomes across race or ethnicity. Future studies to elucidate patients' decision-making process in choosing optimal BR types and timing are necessary to better understand the impact of the observed differences in patient care.

Socioeconomic Disparities in Surgical Care for Congenital Hand Differences

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of socioeconomic factors on access to congenital hand surgery care, hospital admission charges, and analyze these geographic trends across regions of the country.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study was conducted of congenital hand surgery performed in the United States from 2010 through 2020 using the Pediatric Health Information System. Multivariate regression was used to analyze the impact of socioeconomic factors.

RESULTS

During the study interval, 5531 pediatric patients underwent corrective surgery for congenital hand differences, including syndactyly repair (n = 2439), polydactyly repair (n = 2826), and pollicization (n = 266). Patients underwent surgery at significantly earlier age when treated at above-median case volume hospitals (P < .001). Patients with above-median income (P < .001), non-white race (P < .001), commercial insurance (P < .001), living in an urban community (P < .001), and not living in an underserved area (P < .001) were more likely to be treated at high-volume hospitals. Nearly half of patients chose to seek care at a distant hospital rather than the one locally available (49.5%, n = 1172). Of those choosing a distant hospital, most patients chose a higher-volume facility (80.9%, n = 948 of 1172). On multivariate regression, white patients were significantly more likely to choose a more distant, higher-volume hospital (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomic and geographic factors significantly contribute to disparate access to congenital hand surgery across the country. Patients with higher socioeconomic status are more likely to be treated at high-volume hospitals. Treatment at hospitals with higher case volume is associated with earlier age at surgery and decreased hospital admission charges.

National Trends in Microtia Repair Cost and Hospital Length of Stay

Microtia can have deleterious impacts on the functional, psychological, and aesthetic outcomes of affected young children. Reconstructive procedures can alleviate these negative outcomes and significantly improve the quality of life for patients; however, the cost and length of hospital stay (LOS) for such procedures and the factors that impact them have not been well-characterized. This study seeks to understand the hospital-level (institution type, size, and geographic region) and patient-level factors (race, age, and insurance status) that impact cost and LOS in patients who undergo microtia reconstructive surgery. A retrospective data analysis was conducted utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for the years 2008 to 2015. Inclusion criteria included patients who had an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnostic code for microtia (744.23) as well as a procedure for microtia correction (186×/187×). A total of 714 microtia repair cases met the inclusion criteria and were sampled from the NIS database. Microtia repair cost was significantly increased on the West Coast compared with the Northeast ($34,947 versus $29,222, P =0.020), increased with patient age ($614/y, P =0.012), and gradually increased from 2008 to 2015 ($25,897-$48,985, P <0.001). Microtia LOS was significantly increased with government-controlled hospitals compared with private hospitals (1.93 versus 1.39 d, P =0.005), increased with patients on Medicaid compared with private insurance (2.33 versus 2.00 d, P =0.036), and overall decreased with patient age (-0.07 d/y, P =0.001). The results not only identify the multifactorial impacts that drive cost and LOS in microtia repair but provide insights into the financial and medical considerations patients and their families must navigate.

Racial Inequity in Pediatric Anesthesia

Purpose of Review

Minority health disparities have received renewed attention in the USA following several highly publicized racial injustices in 2020. Though the focus has been largely on adults, children are not immune to these inequities. By reviewing racial disparities in pediatric perioperative care, we aim to engage the anesthesia community in the fight against systemic racism.

Recent Findings

Minority children have higher rates of anesthetic and surgical morbidity compared to White children, including respiratory events, length of stay, hospital costs, and even death. These inequities occur across surgical specialties and environments.

Summary

Racial disparities in the perioperative health and management of children are ubiquitous. Herein, we will summarize recent pediatric health disparity literature, discuss some important contributors to persistent inequities, and propose avenues for anesthesiologists to impact the pursuit of equitable healthcare outcomes.

Racial differences in time to blood pressure control of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients: A single-institution study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage occurs in approximately 30,000 patients annually in the United States. Uncontrolled blood pressure is a major risk factor for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Clinical guidelines recommend maintaining blood pressure control until definitive aneurysm securement occurs. It is unknown whether racial differences exist regarding blood pressure control and outcomes (HLOS, discharge disposition) in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Here, we aim to assess whether racial differences exist in 1) presentation, 2) clinical course, and 3) outcomes, including time to blood pressure stabilization, for aSAH patients at a large tertiary care medical center.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of adult aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage cases from 2013 to 2019 at a single large tertiary medical center. Data extracted from the medical record included sex, age, race, insurance status, aneurysm location, aneurysm treatment, initial systolic and diastolic blood pressure, Hunt Hess grade, modified Fisher score, time to blood pressure control (defined as time in minutes from first blood pressure measurement to the first of three consecutive systolic blood pressure measurements under 140mmHg), hospital length of stay, and final discharge disposition.

RESULTS

194 patients met inclusion criteria; 140 (72%) White and 54 (28%) Black. While White patients were more likely than Black patients to be privately insured (62.1% versus 33.3%, p < 0.001), Black patients were more likely than White patients to have Medicaid (55.6% versus 15.0%, p < 0.001). Compared to White patients, Black patients presented with a higher median systolic (165 mmHg versus 148 mmHg, p = 0.004) and diastolic (93 mmHg versus 84 mmHg, p = 0.02) blood pressure. Black patients had a longer median time to blood pressure control than White patients (200 minutes versus 90 minutes, p = 0.001). Black patients had a shorter median hospital length of stay than White patients (15 days versus 18 days, p < 0.031). There was a small but statistically significant difference in modified Fisher score between black and white patients (3.48 versus 3.17, p = 0.04).There were no significant racial differences present in sex, Hunt Hess grade, discharge disposition, complications, or need for further interventions.

CONCLUSION

Black race was associated with higher blood pressure at presentation, longer time to blood pressure control, but shorter hospital length of stay. No racial differences were present in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage associated complications or interventions.

Early Outcomes and Risk Factors in Orthognathic Surgery for Mandibular and Maxillary Hypo- and Hyperplasia: A 13-Year Analysis of a Multi-Institutional Database

BACKGROUND

Orthognathic surgery (OS) is a frequently performed procedure for the correction of dentofacial deformities and malocclusion. Research on OS is mostly limited to single-surgeon experience or single-institutional reports. We, therefore, retrospectively analyzed a multi-institutional database to investigate outcomes of OS and identify risk factors for peri- and postoperative complications.

METHODS

We reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database (2008-2020) to identify patients who underwent OS for mandibular and maxillary hypo- and hyperplasia. The postoperative outcomes of interest included 30-day surgical and medical complications, reoperation, readmission, and mortality. We also evaluated risk factors for complications.

RESULTS

The study population included 674 patients, 48% of whom underwent single jaw surgery, 40% double jaw surgery, and 5.5% triple jaw surgery. The average age was 29 ± 11 years, with an equal gender distribution (females: n = 336; 50%, males: n = 338; 50%). Adverse events were relatively rare, with a total of 29 (4.3%) complications reported. The most common surgical complication was superficial incisional infection (n = 14; 2.1%). While the multivariable analysis revealed isolated single lower jaw surgery (p = 0.03) to be independently associated with surgical complication occurrence, it also identified an association between the outpatient setting and the frequency of surgical complications (p = 0.03) and readmissions (p = 0.02). In addition, Asian ethnicity was identified as a risk factor for bleeding (p = 0.003) and readmission (p = 0.0009).

CONCLUSION

Based on the information recorded by the ACS-NSQIP database, our analysis underscored the positive (short-term) safety profile of OS. We found OS of the mandible to be associated with higher complication rates. The calculated risk role of OS in the outpatient setting warrants further investigation. A significant correlation between Asian OS patients and postoperative adverse events was found. Implementation of these novel risk factors into the surgical workflow may help facial surgeons refine their patient selection and improve patient outcomes. Future studies are needed to investigate the causal relationships of the observed statistical correlations.

The Value of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Race and Ethnicity Affecting Patients

Patient race and ethnicity are important factors in health-care inequity, including care for the patient with hand and upper extremity pathologic condition. Physician diversity has been shown to promote better access, improve health-care quality, and improve satisfaction for underserved populations. Concordance, most often defined as a similarity or shared identity between physician and patient, has been shown to have a positive influence on health-care disparities. Although diversity among Hand surgeons is increasing, it is not matching the diversity of the population as a whole. It is imperative that we work to increase and maintain diversity in order to provide the best care for our patients.

The Hospitalized Adolescent

This clinical report provides pediatricians evidence-based information on the developmentally appropriate, comprehensive clinical care for hospitalized adolescents. Included in this report are opportunities and challenges facing pediatricians when caring for specific hospitalized adolescent populations. The companion policy statement, “The Hospitalized Adolescent,” includes detailed descriptions of adolescent hospital admission demographics, personnel recommendations, and hospital setting and design advice, as well as sections on educational services, legal and ethical matters, and transitions to adult facilities.

Association Between Race, Gender, and Pediatric Postoperative Outcomes: An Updated Retrospective Review

INTRODUCTION

There has not been a recent evaluation of the association between racial and gender and surgical outcomes in children. We aimed to evaluate improvements in race- and gender-related pediatric postoperative outcomes since a report utilizing the Kids' Inpatient Database data from 2003 to 2006.

METHODS

Using Kids' Inpatient Database (2009, 2012, 2016), we identified 245,976 pediatric patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis (93.6%), pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis (2.7%), empyema decortication (1.6%), congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair (0.7%), small bowel resection for intussusception (0.5%), or colonic resection for Hirschsprung disease (0.2%). The primary outcome was the development of postoperative complications. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate risk-adjusted associations among race, gender, income, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Most patients were male (61.5%) and 45.7% were White. Postoperative complications were significantly associated with male gender (P < 0.0001) and race (P < 0.0001). After adjustment, Black patients were more likely to experience any complication than White patients (adjusted odds ratio 1.3, confidence interval 1.2-1.4), and males were more likely than females (adjusted odds ratio 1.3, confidence interval 1.2-1.4).

CONCLUSIONS

No clear progress has been made in eliminating race- or gender-based disparities in pediatric postoperative outcomes. New strategies are needed to better understand and address these disparities.

Racial Disparities in Charges, Length of Stay, and Complications Following Adult Inpatient Epistaxis Treatment

BACKGROUND

Although recent studies have identified an association between race and adverse outcomes in head and neck surgeries, there are limited data examining the impact of racial disparities on adult inpatient outcomes following epistaxis management procedures.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the association between race and adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients undergoing epistaxis treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort analysis utilized the 2003 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were used to identify cases with a primary diagnosis of epistaxis that underwent a procedure for epistaxis control. Cases with missing data were excluded. Higher total charges and prolonged length of stay (LOS) were indicated by values greater than the 75th percentile. Demographics, hospital characteristics, Elixhauser comorbidity score, and complications were compared among race cohorts using univariate chi-square analysis and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The independent effect of race on adverse outcomes was analyzed using multivariate binary logistic regression while adjusting for the aforementioned variables.

RESULTS

Of the 83 356 cases of epistaxis included, 80.3% were White, 12.5% Black, and 7.2% Hispanic. Black patients had increased odds of urinary/renal complications (odds ratio [OR] 2.148, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.797-2.569, P < .001) compared to White patients. Additionally, Black patients experienced higher odds of prolonged LOS (OR 1.227, 95% CI 1.101-1.367, P < .001) and higher total charges (OR 1.257, 95% CI 1.109-1.426, P < .001) compared to White patients. Similarly, Hispanic patients were more likely to experience urinary/renal complications (OR 1.605, 95% CI 1.244-2.071, P < .001), higher total charges (OR 1.519, 95% CI 1.302-1.772, P < .001), and prolonged LOS (OR 1.157, 95% CI 1.007-1.331, P = .040) compared to White patients.

CONCLUSION

Race is an important factor associated with an increased incidence of complications in hospitalized patients treated for epistaxis.

Trends of Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Pediatric Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), eminently preventable nosocomial infections, are a substantial source of morbidity, mortality, and increased resource utilization in pediatric care. Racial or ethnic disparities in health outcomes have been demonstrated across an array of medical specialties and practices in pediatric patients. However, it is unknown whether disparities exist in the rate of CLABSIs. Our objective was to evaluate the trends in racial and ethnic disparities of CLABSIs over the past 5 years.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using data from Pediatric Health Information System database collected from tertiary children's hospitals in the United States. Participants included 226 802 children (<18 years) admitted to the emergency department or inpatient ward between 2016 and 2021 who required central venous catheter placement. The primary outcome was risk-adjusted rate of CLABSI, occurring during the same admission, across race and ethnicity.

RESULTS

Of the 226 802 children, 121 156 (53.4%) were White, 40 589 (17.9%) were Black, and 43 374 (19.1%) were Hispanic. CLABSI rate decreased in all racial/ethnic groups over the study period, with the rates being consistently higher in Black (relative risk [RR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.37; P < .01) and Hispanic children (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08-1.26; P < .01) than in White children. There was no statistically significant evidence that gaps in CLABSI rate between racial/ethnic groups narrowed over time.

CONCLUSIONS

CLABSI rate was persistently higher among Black and Hispanic children than their White peers. These findings emphasize the need for future exploration of the causes of persistent racial and ethnic disparities in pediatric patients.

Association Between Patient Diversity in Hospitals and Racial/Ethnic Differences in Patient Length of Stay

BACKGROUND

Hospitals serving a disproportionate share of racial/ethnic minorities have been shown to have poorer quality outcomes. It is unknown whether efficiencies in inpatient care, measured by length of stay (LOS), differ based on the proportion patients served by a hospital who are minorities.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between the racial/ethnic diversity of a hospital's patients and disparities in LOS.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

One million five hundred forty-six thousand nine hundred fifty-five admissions using the 2017 New York State Inpatient Database from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project.

MAIN MEASURE

Differences in mean adjusted LOS (ALOS) between White and Black, Hispanic, and Other (Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, and Other) admissions by Racial/Ethnic Diversity Index (proportion of non-White patients admitted to total patients admitted to that same hospital) in quintiles (Q1 to Q5), stratified by discharge destination. Mean LOS was adjusted for patient demographic, clinical, and admission characteristics and for individual intercepts for each hospital.

KEY RESULTS

In both unadjusted and adjusted analysis, Black-White and Other-White mean LOS differences were smallest in the most diverse hospitals (Black-White: unadjusted, -0.07 days [-0.1 to -0.04], and adjusted, 0.16 days [95% CI: 0.16 to 0.16]; Other-White: unadjusted, -0.74 days [95% CI: -0.77 to -0.71], and adjusted, 0.01 days [95% CI: 0.01 to 0.02]). For Hispanic patients, in unadjusted analysis, the mean LOS difference was greatest in the most diverse hospitals (-0.92 days, 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.89) but after adjustment, this was no longer the case. Similar patterns across all racial/ethnic groups were observed after analyses were stratified by discharge destination.

CONCLUSION

Mean adjusted LOS differences between White and Black patients, and White and patients of Other race was smallest in most diverse hospitals, but not differences between Hispanic and White patients. These findings may reflect specific structural factors which affect racial/ethnic differences in patient LOS.

Race-Based Differences in the Utilization and Timing of Secondary Cleft Procedures in the United States

Primary CL/P repair, revisions, and secondary procedures-cleft rhinoplasty, speech surgery, and alveolar bone grafting (ABG)-performed from 2014-2018 were identified from the Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Utilization estimates were derived via univariable and multivariable logistic regression. A Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test and multivariable linear regression were used to assess differences in timing for each procedure cohort.

The primary outcome measures were the odds of a patient being a certain race/ethnicity, and the age at which patients of different race/ethnicity receive surgery.

There were 23 780 procedures analyzed. After controlling for sex, diagnosis, and functional status, there were significant differences in utilization estimates across procedure groups. Primarily, utilization was lowest in patient who were Black for cleft rhinoplasty (OR = 0.70, P = .023), ABG (OR = 0.44, P < .001) and speech surgery (OR = 0.57, P = .012), and highest in patients who were Asian patients in all surgery cohorts (OR 2.05-4.43). Timing of surgery also varied by race, although differences were minimal.

CONCLUSIONS

Estimates of utilization and timing of secondary cleft procedures varied by race, particularly among patients who were Black (poor utilization) or Asian (high utilization). Further studies should identify the causes and implications of underutilized and/or delayed cleft care.

Is Cleft Lip or Palate a Risk Factor for Perioperative Complications in Orthognathic Surgery?

PURPOSE

Perioperative outcomes following cleft orthognathic surgery are not well established. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of orthognathic specific complications (OSCs) in patients with and without cleft lip and/or palate.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program adult and pediatric databases were used to enroll patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. The primary predictor variable was a prior diagnosis of cleft lip and/or palate: cleft versus noncleft. The primary outcome variable was OSCs (yes/no) within 30 days of the index operation. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were computed to measure the association between cleft status and OSCs.

RESULTS

The study sample was composed of 1,149 subjects: 98 in the cleft group and 1,051 in the noncleft group. The incidence of OSCs was 6.1 and 4.7% for the cleft and noncleft groups, respectively (P = .461). After adjusting for age, cleft status, bone grafting, segmentation of the maxilla, and history of bleeding disorder, classification as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) III (P = .002, odds ratio [OR] = 3.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.63-9.40), ASA IV (P = .039, OR = 9.47, 95% CI 1.12-80.4), and isolated mandibular osteotomies (P = .006, OR = 3.23, 95% CI 1.40-7.48) were independent predictors of OSCs. Length of stay was 1.66 ± 1.14 days compared to 1.37 ± 3.74 days for the cleft and noncleft groups, respectively (P = .443).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative OSCs and length of hospital stay between cleft and noncleft patients. Cleft status was not an independent predictor of OSCs; instead, greater ASA classification and isolated mandibular osteotomies were the only predisposing factors. Patients with clefts undergoing orthognathic surgery do not have an increased risk of short-term OSCs within the limitations of this study.

The Impact of Social Determinants of Health in Facial and Craniomaxillofacial Reconstruction: Can We Do Better?

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are integral to consider when delivering craniomaxillofacial and facial reconstructive care for patients. The American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) has instituted a formalized multidisciplinary care team model that recognizes such determinants and has aggregated patient-led organizations to strengthen patients' education and support system. This review discusses the need for all surgeons engaged in facial and craniomaxillofacial reconstruction to consider SDOH in their practice. Additionally, we explore how factors such as race, insurance status, education level, cost, and access to follow-up care, impact surgical care for craniosynostosis, facial trauma, orthognathic surgery, head and neck cancer, and facial paralysis. We propose that the ACPA team model be applied to other societies that care for the broader scope of patients in need of facial and craniomaxillofacial reconstruction to strengthen the communication, collaboration, and standardization of care delivery that is personalized to the needs of each patient.

The Opportunity Cost of Resident Involvement in Adult Craniofacial Surgery: An Analysis of Relative Value Units

PURPOSE

Within the academic surgical setting resident involvement may confer longer operative times. The increasing pressures to maximize clinical productivity and decreasing reimbursement rates, however, may conflict with these principles. This study calculates the opportunity cost of resident involvement in craniofacial surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was conducted with patients who underwent craniofacial procedures from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2012. Patients were selected based on relevant Current Procedural Terminology codes for craniofacial pathologies (ie, trauma, head and neck reconstruction, orthognathic surgery, and facial reanimation). Variables included patient demographics, operative time, and presence or absence of resident trainee. Average relative value units were calculated to determine the opportunity cost of resident involvement for each craniofacial procedure.

RESULTS

In total, 2096 patients were identified through the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2012. Resident involvement was associated with a statistically significant higher operative time (P < 0.001) for facial reanimation, facial trauma, orthognathic surgery, and head and neck reconstruction. The opportunity costs per case associated with resident involvement were the highest for head and neck reconstruction ($1468.04), followed by orthognathic surgery ($1247.03), facial trauma ($533.03), and facial reanimation ($358.32). Resident involvement was associated with higher rate of complications for head and neck reconstruction (P < 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Resident involvement is associated with longer operative times, higher complications, and higher re-operations, compared to attending exclusive surgical care. Future studies may consider how reimbursements should align incentives to promote resident education and training.

Early Adverse Events Following Pediatric Mandibular Advancement: Analysis of the ACS NSQIP-Pediatric Database

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess early adverse events and patient factors associated with complications following mandible distraction osteogenesis (MDO).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric (NSQIP-Pediatric) database, years 2012 to 2019, was queried for patients undergoing mandible advancement via relevant Current Procedural Terminology and postoperative diagnosis codes. Thirty-day adverse events and co-morbidities are assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 208 patients were identified with 17.3% (n = 36) experiencing an adverse event, reoperation (n = 14), and readmission (n = 11) being most common. Patients < 365 days old at the time of operation were more likely to experience an adverse event (26.1% vs 10.8%; P = .005). However, among patients less than 1 year of age, differences in the complication rates between patients  ≤ 28 days and >28 days (30.2% vs 22.2%; P = .47) and those weighing  ≤ 4 kg and >4 kg (31.7% vs 11.5%; P = .063) did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse events following mandible advancement are relatively common, though often minor. In our analysis of the NSQIP-Pediatric database, neonatal age ( ≤ 28 days) or weight  ≤ 4 kg did not result in a statistically significant increase in complications among patients less than 1 year of age. Providers should consider early intervention in patients who may benefit from MDO.

Racial Disparities in the Surgical Management of Benign Craniomaxillofacial Bone Lesions

PURPOSE

Racial disparities can influence surgical care in the United States. The purpose of this study was to determine if race and ethnicity were independent risk factors for adverse 30-day outcomes after surgical management of benign craniomaxillofacial bone tumors.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study from 2012 to 2018 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases. Patients undergoing surgical removal of craniomaxillofacial benign lesions based on Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases codes were included. Patients who had unrelated concurrent surgeries, or malignant, skull-based or soft tissue lesions were excluded. Primary outcomes were surgical complications and hospital length of stay (LOS). Univariate analyses were used with race as the independent variable to identify predictors of primary outcomes. Statistically significant factors were added to a multivariable logistic regression model.

RESULTS

This study included 372 patients. Postoperative complications were highest among Black patients, who had a 4-fold increase in minor complications (P = 0.023) and over a 6-fold increase in major complications (P = 0.008) compared to White patients. Black patients also had a mean increase of 2.3 days in LOS compared to White patients (P < 0.001). The multivariate regression model showed higher rates of major complications and longer LOS for Black patients (P = 0.003, P = 0.006, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Even when controlling for other variables, Black race was an independent risk factor for major complications and increased LOS. Further research should seek to identify the root cause of these findings in order to ensure safe and equitable surgery for all patients, regardless of race or ethnicity.