Risk factors for local recurrence after total en bloc spondylectomy for metastatic spinal tumors: A retrospective study

Total En Bloc Spondylectomy in a Case of Solitary Metastatic Breast Carcinoma With Intact Neurology: A Case Report

The management of spinal metastasis varies from patient to patient, depending on the type of lesion, stage of the disease, extension into the spinal canal, associated fractures, and life expectancy. We present a case of solitary metastasis with intact neurology in a 48-year-old lady who underwent a radical mastectomy for T2 N3 M0 breast carcinoma 34 months ago. Total en bloc spondylectomy in a neurologically intact patient is a challenging one. In all posterior approaches, there is a high chance of postoperative neurodeficiency. In our case, a combined approach seems to be a much safer procedure with easy accessibility to remove the total D8 vertebra.

The Perioperative Effects of Preoperative Radiotherapy in Metastatic Spinal Tumor Patients

OBJECTIVE

Radiotherapy is one of the important treatment options for metastatic spinal tumors but is not the definite intervention in all cases, as there are patients who still require surgical treatment because of severe pain or neurologic events after this treatment. We evaluated the perioperative effects of preoperative radiotherapy in these cases as a future guide for surgeons on critical considerations in this period.

METHODS

We included 328 patients in this study who had undergone decompression and fusion surgery for metastatic spinal tumors. Patients who underwent surgery with preoperative radiotherapy were designated as the radiotherapy group (group RT, n = 81), and cases of surgery without preoperative radiotherapy were assigned to the non-radiotherapy group (group nRT, n = 247). We compared the demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative factors between these 2 groups.

RESULTS

In terms of intraoperative factors, statistically significant differences were evident in operation time, estimated blood loss, and transfusion (RT vs. nRT: 188.1 ± 80.7 minutes vs. 231.2 ± 106.1 minutes, 607.2 ± 532.7 mL vs. 830.1 ± 1324.7 mL, and 30.9% vs. 43.3%, P < 0.001, P < 0.031, and P < 0.048, respectively). With regard to postoperative factors, the incidence of infection, wound problems, and local recurrence were statistically higher in group RT (RT vs. nRT: 6.2% vs. 0.8%, 12.3% vs. 0.8%, 23.4% vs. 13.7%, P = 0.004, P < 0.001, and P = 0.038, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative radiotherapy has the intraoperative advantages of reducing bleeding and shortening the operating time, but postoperative caution is needed because of the possibility of infection, wound problems, and local recurrence increases.

A new era in the management of spinal metastasis

Despite the recent advances in cancer treatment, the incidence of patients with spinal metastases continues to grow along with the total number of cancer patients. Spinal metastases can significantly impair activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QOL), compared with other types of bone metastases, as they are characterized with severe pain and paralysis caused by skeletal-related events. Reduced ADL can also lead to treatment limitations as certain anticancer agents and radiation therapy are not compatible treatments; thus, leading to a shorter life expectancy. Consequently, maintaining ADLs in patients with spinal metastases is paramount, and spine surgeons have an integral role to play in this regard. However, neurosurgeon, orthopedic and spinal surgeons in Japan do not have a proactive treatment approach to spinal metastases, which may prevent them from providing appropriate treatment when needed (clinical inertia). To overcome such endemic inertia, it is essential for 1) spine surgeons to understand and be more actively involved with patients with musculoskeletal disorders (cancer locomo) and cancer patients; 2) the adoption of a multidisciplinary approach (coordination and meetings not only with the attending oncologist but also with spine surgeons, radiologists, rehabilitation specialists, and other professionals) to preemptive treatment such as medication, radiotherapy, and surgical treatment; and 3) the integration of the latest findings associated with minimally invasive spinal treatments that have expanded the indications for treatment of spinal metastases and improved treatment outcomes. This heralds a new era in the management of spinal metastases.

Clinical Outcomes of Total En Bloc Spondylectomy for Previously Irradiated Spinal Metastases: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Study

This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) for spinal metastases previously treated with radiotherapy (RT). This study enrolled 142 patients who were divided into two groups: those with and those without an RT history. Forty-two patients were selected from each group through propensity score matching, and postoperative complications, local recurrence, and overall survival rates were compared. The incidence of postoperative complications was significantly higher in the group with an RT history than in the group without an RT history (57.1% vs. 35.7%, respectively). The group with an RT history had a higher local recurrence rate than the group without an RT history (1-year rate: 17.5% vs. 0%; 2-year rate: 20.8% vs. 2.9%; 5-year rate: 24.4% vs. 6.9%). The overall postoperative survival tended to be lower in the group with an RT history; however, there was no significant difference between the two groups (2-year survival: 64.3% vs. 66.7%; 5-year survival: 47.3% vs. 57.1%). When planning a TES for irradiated spinal metastases, the risk of postoperative complications and local recurrence should be fully considered.

The Impact of Frailty on Postoperative Complications in Total En Bloc Spondylectomy for Spinal Tumors

Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is an effective treatment for spinal tumors. However, its complication rate is high, and the corresponding risk factors remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify the risk factors for postoperative complications after TES, including the patient's general condition, such as frailty and their levels of inflammatory biomarkers. We included 169 patients who underwent TES at our hospital from January 2011-December 2021. The complication group comprised patients who experienced postoperative complications that required additional intensive treatments. We analyzed the relationship between early complications and the following factors: age, sex, body mass index, type of tumor, location of tumor, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, physical status, frailty (categorized by the 5-factor Modified Frailty Index [mFI-5]), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, preoperative chemotherapy, preoperative radiotherapy, surgical approach, and the number of resected vertebrae. Of the 169 patients, 86 (50.1%) were included in the complication group. Multivariate analysis showed that high mFI-5 scores (odds ratio [OR] = 2.99, p < 0.001) and an increased number of resected vertebrae (OR = 1.87, p = 0.018) were risk factors for postoperative complications. Frailty and the number of resected vertebrae were independent risk factors for postoperative complications after TES for spinal tumors.

Treatment of cervical spine metastasis with minimally invasive cervical spondylectomy: A case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Cervical spondylectomy for the treatment of cervical tumors is traumatic, causes bleeding, and is risky. This study reports on the experience with minimally invasive cervical spondylectomy for a cervical metastasis and reviewed the literature on cervical spondylectomy. The purpose was to reduce the risk and trauma of spondylectomy.

CASE SUMMARY

A 60-year-old woman presented with cervical pain and radiating pain in the left upper limb for more than 2 mo. Preoperative diagnosis was C4 metastasis of thyroid cancer. Preoperative visual analogue scale score was 5. American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) grade was E. Tomita classification was 7. Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini (WBB) classification was A-D, 3-9. Tomita score was 5. Modified Tokuhashi score was 9. Spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) was 13. The patient underwent minimally invasive cervical spondylectomy on September 28, 2017. The operative time was 200 min; the estimated blood loss was 1200 mL. The operation was successful, without complications. The postoperative visual analogue scale score was 0. The patient remained classified as ASIA grade E at the last follow-up. She accepted regular iodine-131 therapy postoperatively. The serum thyroglobulin (Tg) level of this patient was 299.02 ng/mL at 1 mo after the operation and was 13.57 ng/mL at the last follow-up. There was no local recurrence at the 25-mo follow-up, according to images, single-photon emission computed tomography, and serum Tg levels. Obvious ossification and solid fusion of C3-C5 were found at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive cervical spondylectomy with tubular retractor could minimize soft tissue trauma, intraoperative traction injury, and paraspinal muscle injury, accelerating postoperative recovery. This technique requires a rich experience in cervical spine surgery with tubular retractors, so that surgeons can visualize the anatomical structure in a small field.

Radiation Disrupts the Protective Function of the Spinal Meninges in a Mouse Model of Tumor-induced Spinal Cord Compression

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in multidisciplinary treatments for various cancers have extended the survival period of patients with spinal metastases. Radiotherapy has been widely used to treat spinal metastases; nevertheless, long-term survivors sometimes undergo more surgical intervention after radiotherapy because of local tumor relapse. Generally, intradural invasion of a spinal tumor seldom occurs because the dura mater serves as a tissue barrier against tumor infiltration. However, after radiation exposure, some spinal tumors invade the dura mater, resulting in leptomeningeal dissemination, intraoperative dural injury, or postoperative local recurrence. The mechanisms of how radiation might affect the dura have not been well-studied.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

To investigate how radiation affects the spinal meninges, we asked: (1) What is the effect of irradiation on the meningeal barrier's ability to protect against carcinoma infiltration? (2) What is the effect of irradiation on the meningeal barrier's ability to protect against sarcoma infiltration? (3) What is the effect of irradiation on dural microstructure observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM)? (4) What is the effect of irradiation on dural microstructure observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM)?

METHODS

Eighty-four 10-week-old female ddY mice were randomly divided into eight groups: mouse mammary tumor (MMT) implantation 6 weeks after 0-Gy irradiation (nonirradiation) (n = 11), MMT implantation 6 weeks after 20-Gy irradiation (n = 10), MMT implantation 12 weeks after nonirradiation (n = 10), MMT implantation 12 weeks after 20-Gy irradiation (n = 11), mouse osteosarcoma (LM8) implantation 6 weeks after nonirradiation (n = 11), LM8 implantation 6 weeks after 20-Gy irradiation (n = 11), LM8 implantation 12 weeks after nonirradiation (n = 10), and LM8 implantation 12 weeks after 20-Gy irradiation (n = 10); female mice were used for a mammary tumor metastasis model and ddY mice, a closed-colony mice with genetic diversity, were selected to represent interhuman diversity. Mice in each group underwent surgery to generate a tumor-induced spinal cord compression model at either 6 weeks or 12 weeks after irradiation to assess changes in the meningeal barrier's ability to protect against tumor infiltration. During surgery, the mice were implanted with MMT (representative of a carcinoma) or LM8 tumor. When the mice became paraplegic because of spinal cord compression by the growing implanted tumor, they were euthanized and evaluated histologically. Four mice died from anesthesia and 10 mice per group were euthanized (MMT-implanted groups: MMT implantation occurred 6 weeks after nonirradiation [n = 10], 6 weeks after irradiation [n = 10], 12 weeks after nonirradiation [n = 10], and 12 weeks after irradiation [n = 10]; LM8-implanted groups: LM8 implantation performed 6 weeks after nonirradiation [n = 10], 6 weeks after irradiation [n = 10], 12 weeks after nonirradiation [n = 10], and 12 weeks after irradiation [n = 10]); 80 mice were evaluated. The spines of the euthanized mice were harvested; hematoxylin and eosin staining and Masson's trichrome staining slides were prepared for histologic assessment of each specimen. In the histologic assessment, intradural invasion of the implanted tumor was graded in each group by three observers blinded to the type of tumor, presence of irradiation, and the timing of the surgery. Grade 0 was defined as no intradural invasion with intact dura mater, Grade 1 was defined as intradural invasion with linear dural continuity, and Grade 2 was defined as intradural invasion with disruption of the dural continuity. Additionally, we euthanized 12 mice for a microstructural analysis of dura mater changes by two observers blinded to the presence of irradiation. Six mice (three mice in the 12 weeks after nonirradiation group and three mice in the 12 weeks after 20-Gy irradiation group) were quantitatively analyzed for defects on the dural surface with SEM. The other six mice (three mice in the 12 weeks after nonirradiation group and three mice in the 12 weeks after 20-Gy irradiation group) were analyzed for layer structure of collagen fibers constituting dura mater by TEM. In the SEM assessment, the number and size of defects on the dural surface on images (200 μm × 300 μm) at low magnification (× 2680) were evaluated. A total of 12 images (two per mouse) were evaluated for this assessment. The days from surgery to paraplegia were compared between each of the tumor groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The scores of intradural tumor invasion grades and the number of defects on dural surface per SEM image were compared between irradiation group and nonirradiation group using the Mann-Whitney U test. Interobserver reliabilities of assessing intradural tumor invasion grades and the number of dural defects on the dural surface were analyzed using Fleiss'κ coefficient. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the median (range) time to paraplegia among the MMT implantation 6 weeks after nonirradiation group, the 6 weeks after irradiation group, the 12 weeks after nonirradiation group, and the 12 weeks after irradiation group (16 days [14 to 17] versus 14 days [12 to 18] versus 16 days [14 to 17] versus 14 days [12 to 15]; χ2 = 4.7; p = 0.19). There was also no difference in the intradural invasion score between the MMT implantation 6 weeks after irradiation group and the 6 weeks after nonirradiation group (8 of 10 Grade 0 and 2 of 10 Grade 1 versus 10 of 10 Grade 0; p = 0.17). On the other hand, there was a higher intradural invasion score in the MMT implantation 12 weeks after irradiation group than the 12 weeks after nonirradiation group (5 of 10 Grade 0, 3 of 10 Grade 1 and 2 of 10 Grade 2 versus 10 of 10 Grade 0; p = 0.02). Interobserver reliability of assessing intradural tumor invasion grades in the MMT-implanted group was 0.94. There was no difference in the median (range) time to paraplegia among in the LM8 implantation 6 weeks after nonirradiation group, the 6 weeks after irradiation group, the 12 weeks after nonirradiation group, and the 12 weeks after irradiation group (12 days [9 to 13] versus 10 days [8 to 13] versus 11 days [8 to 13] versus 9 days [6 to 12]; χ2 = 2.4; p = 0.50). There was also no difference in the intradural invasion score between the LM8 implantation 6 weeks after irradiation group and the 6 weeks after nonirradiation group (7 of 10 Grade 0, 1 of 10 Grade 1 and 2 of 10 Grade 2 versus 8 of 10 Grade 0 and 2 of 10 Grade 1; p = 0.51), whereas there was a higher intradural invasion score in the LM8 implantation 12 weeks after irradiation group than the 12 weeks after nonirradiation group (3 of 10 Grade 0, 3 of 10 Grade 1 and 4 of 10 Grade 2 versus 8 of 10 Grade 0 and 2 of 10 Grade 1; p = 0.04). Interobserver reliability of assessing intradural tumor invasion grades in the LM8-implanted group was 0.93. In the microstructural analysis of the dura mater using SEM, irradiated mice had small defects on the dural surface at low magnification and degeneration of collagen fibers at high magnification. The median (range) number of defects on the dural surface per image in the irradiated mice was larger than that of nonirradiated mice (2 [1 to 3] versus 0; difference of medians, 2/image; p = 0.002) and the median size of defects was 60 μm (30 to 80). Interobserver reliability of assessing number of defects on the dural surface was 1.00. TEM revealed that nonirradiated mice demonstrated well-organized, multilayer structures, while irradiated mice demonstrated irregularly layered structures at low magnification. At high magnification, well-ordered cross-sections of collagen fibers were observed in the nonirradiated mice. However, disordered alignment of collagen fibers was observed in irradiated mice.

CONCLUSION

Intradural tumor invasion and disruptions of the dural microstructure were observed in the meninges of mice after irradiation, indicating radiation-induced disruption of the meningeal barrier.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We conclude that in this form of delivery, radiation is associated with disruption of the dural meningeal barrier, indicating a need to consider methods to avoid or limit Postradiation tumor relapse and spinal cord compression when treating spinal metastases so that patients do not experience intradural tumor invasion. Surgeons should be aware of the potential for intradural tumor invasion when they perform post-irradiation spinal surgery to minimize the risks for intraoperative dural injury and spinal cord injury. Further research in patients with irradiated spinal metastases is necessary to confirm that the same findings are observed in humans and to seek irradiation methods that prevent or minimize the disruption of meningeal barrier function.

Total en bloc resection of primary and metastatic spine tumors

Primary and metastatic tumors of the spine represent a significant cause of patient morbidity, and present a management challenge to treating providers. From a neurosurgical standpoint, resection surgery may be warranted in cases of spinal instability, progressive disease, neurological compromise, or intractable symptoms. Removal of a tumor "en bloc" offers a more aggressive modality over more conservative resection techniques. En bloc resection entails the removal of the entirety of a tumor without violation of its capsule, and may offer improved rates of local control and overall survival in appropriately selected patients. Conversely, this technique carries a higher complication rate, and requires a unique set of technical skills as compared to more traditional resection. Here, we describe the technical aspects of en bloc resection, as well as specific indications and considerations when employing this operative technique.