1
|
Hyland KA, Amaden GH, Diachina AK, Miller SN, Dorfman CS, Berchuck SI, Winger JG, Somers TJ, Keefe FJ, Uronis HE, Kelleher SA. mHealth Coping Skills Training for Symptom Management (mCOPE) for colorectal Cancer patients in early to mid-adulthood: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2023; 33:101126. [PMID: 37077935 PMCID: PMC10106511 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in early to mid-adulthood (≤50 years) are challenged by high symptom burden (i.e., pain, fatigue, distress) and age-related stressors (e.g., managing family, work). Cognitive behavioral theory (CBT)-based coping skills training interventions reduce symptoms and improve quality of life in cancer patients. However, traditional CBT-based interventions are not accessible to these patients (e.g., in-person sessions, during work day), nor designed to address symptoms within the context of this stage of life. We developed a mobile health (mHealth) coping skills training program for pain, fatigue and distress (mCOPE) for CRC patients in early to mid-adulthood. We utilize a randomized controlled trial to test the extent to which mCOPE reduces pain, fatigue and distress (multiple primary outcomes) and improves quality of life and symptom self-efficacy (secondary outcomes). Methods/Design Patients (N = 160) ≤50 years with CRC endorsing pain, fatigue and/or distress are randomized 1:1 to mCOPE or standard care. mCOPE is a five-session CBT-based coping skills training program (e.g., relaxation, activity pacing, cognitive restructuring) that was adapted for CRC patients in early to mid-adulthood. mCOPE utilizes mHealth technology (e.g., videoconference, mobile app) to deliver coping skills training, capture symptom and skills use data, and provide personalized support and feedback. Self-report assessments are completed at baseline, post-treatment (5-8 weeks post-baseline; primary endpoint), and 3- and 6-months later. Conclusions mCOPE is innovative and potentially impactful for CRC patients in early to mid-adulthood. Hypothesis confirmation would demonstrate initial efficacy of a mHealth cognitive behavioral intervention to reduce symptom burden in younger CRC patients.
Collapse
|
2
|
Porter LS, Weiner DK, Ramos K, Barnes DE, Schmader KE, Gwyther L, Ritchie CS, Keefe FJ. Partnering to cope with pain: A pilot study of a caregiver-assisted pain coping skills intervention for patients with cognitive impairment and dementia. Palliat Support Care 2022; 20:785-793. [PMID: 36942584 PMCID: PMC10032330 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951521001747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a new caregiver-assisted pain coping skills training protocol specifically tailored for community-dwelling persons with cognitive impairment and pain, and assess its feasibility and acceptability. METHOD In Phase I, we conducted interviews with 10 patient-caregiver dyads to gather feedback about intervention content and delivery. Phase II was a single-arm pilot test to evaluate the intervention's feasibility and acceptability. Dyads in the pilot study (n = 11) completed baseline surveys, received five intervention sessions, and then completed post-intervention surveys. Analyses focused on feasibility and acceptability. RESULTS Dyads responded positively to the pain coping skills presented in the interviews; their feedback was used to refine the intervention. Findings from the pilot study suggested that the intervention was feasible and acceptable. 69% of eligible dyads consented, 82% completed all five intervention sessions, and 100% completed the post-treatment assessment. Caregivers reported high satisfaction ratings. They also reported using the pain coping skills on a regular basis, and that they found most of the skills helpful and easy to use. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS These preliminary findings suggest that a caregiver-assisted pain coping skills intervention is feasible and acceptable, and that it may be a promising approach to managing pain in patients with cognitive impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura S Porter
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Debra K Weiner
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Katherine Ramos
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Deborah E Barnes
- University of San Francisco, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, San Francisco, CA
| | - Kenneth E Schmader
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine and GRECC, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Lisa Gwyther
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Christine S Ritchie
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Francis J Keefe
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stalls JM, Bovbjerg DH, Somers TJ, Plumb Vilardaga JC, Kimmick GG, McAuliffe PF, Keefe FJ, Posluszny DM, Sullivan MJL, Erkanli A, Reed SD, Sutton L, Owen L, Massa L, Shelby RA. Improving well-being for individuals with persistent pain after surgery for breast cancer, lobular carcinoma in situ, or ductal carcinoma in situ: A randomized clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 122:106934. [PMID: 36152791 PMCID: PMC10001426 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
>276,000 Americans will be diagnosed with invasive breast cancer, lobular carcinoma in situ, or ductal carcinoma in situ this year and most will undergo breast surgery as part of their care. Although prognosis is excellent, many patients experience persistent post-surgical pain (PSP), which has no satisfactory pharmacological treatment. The causal contributions of pain-associated psychological factors (e.g., catastrophic thoughts about pain, psychological flexibility, self-efficacy) to the continuing burden of PSP have not yet been determined and may be opportune intervention targets. The randomized trial described here will compare the benefits of three manualized behavioral interventions for individuals with PSP. Participants will receive either: 1) self-guided health education (SGHE); 2) interventionist-guided health education (IGHE); or 3) interventionist-guided pain coping skills training with elements of acceptance and commitment therapy that specially target catastrophic thoughts about pain, self-efficacy, and psychological flexibility (CST-PSP). Participants will prospectively complete validated assessments of primary outcomes (PSP severity and interference) at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3-, 6-, and 12-months later. Validated measures of emotional distress and cancer-specific distress will be assessed as secondary outcomes. To test their roles as drivers of PSP, catastrophic thoughts about pain, self-efficacy, and psychological flexibility, will be assessed and statistically analyzed as mediators of hypothesized beneficial effects. The interventions' impacts on pain sensitivity and central sensitization will be investigated to test these physiological pathways as proximal drivers of PSP. To better characterize the patient experience, additional validated measures will be explored for associations with PSP, along with demographic and clinical factors. Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04225585, registered January 13, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliann M Stalls
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Dana H Bovbjerg
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Tamara J Somers
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | | | - Gretchen G Kimmick
- Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Priscilla F McAuliffe
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Francis J Keefe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Donna M Posluszny
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | | | - Alaattin Erkanli
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Shelby D Reed
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Linda Sutton
- Duke Cancer Network, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Lynda Owen
- Duke Cancer Network, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Lisa Massa
- Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Rebecca A Shelby
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Porter LS, Ramos K, Baucom DH, Steinhauser K, Erkanli A, Strauman TJ, Zafar SY, Check DK, Leo K, Liu E, Keefe FJ. Evaluating a couple communication skills training (CCST) intervention for advanced cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:712. [PMID: 36028908 PMCID: PMC9419413 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06656-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients and their intimate partners, advanced cancer poses significant challenges that can negatively impact both individuals and their relationship. Prior studies have found evidence that couple-based communication skills interventions can to be beneficial for patients and partners. However, these studies have been limited by reliance on in-person treatment delivery and have not targeted couples at high risk for poor outcomes. This study tests the efficacy of a Couples Communication Skills Training (CCST) intervention delivered via videoconference for couples reporting high levels of holding back from discussing cancer-related concerns, a variable associated with poorer psychological and relationship functioning. METHODS This RCT is designed to evaluate the efficacy of CCST in improving patient and partner relationship functioning (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes include patient and partner psychological functioning and patient symptoms and health care use. We also examine the role of objective and self-reported communication behaviors as mediators of treatment effects. Two hundred thirty patients with advanced lung, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and breast cancer and their partners will be randomized to CCST or an education control intervention. Participants in both conditions complete self-reported outcome measures at baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and 3 months post-treatment. Objective measures of communication are derived from video-recorded couple conversations collected at baseline and post-treatment. An implementation-related process evaluation (assessing implementation outcomes and potential barriers to/facilitators of implementation) will be conducted to inform future efforts to implement CCST in real-world settings. DISCUSSION This trial can yield important new knowledge about effective ways to improve patient and partner adjustment to advanced cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (Trial # NCT04590885); registration date: October 19, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura S Porter
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC 102506, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| | - Katherine Ramos
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC 102506, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Donald H Baucom
- Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Karen Steinhauser
- Population Health Sciences Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Alaattin Erkanli
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - S Yousuf Zafar
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Devon K Check
- Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Karena Leo
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC 102506, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Evan Liu
- Trinity College of Arts & Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Francis J Keefe
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC 102506, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhu S, Yang C, Chen S, Kang L, Li T, Li J, Li L. Effectiveness of a perioperative support programme to reduce psychological distress for family caregivers of patients with early-stage lung cancer: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e064416. [PMID: 35998958 PMCID: PMC9403120 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Family caregivers play a key role in providing ongoing long-term care and assistance to their loved ones during cancer treatment. However, family caregivers of patients with lung cancer are frequently unprepared for their roles and they may undergo psychological distress, thus reducing their own quality of life while affecting patients' health outcomes. Interventions that specifically target this population are lacking. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a perioperative support programme on family caregivers of patients with early-stage lung cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study is guided by the Stress-Coping Model. Family caregivers of patients diagnosed with early-stage lung cancer and those who are scheduled for lung resection treatment will be invited to participate. Participants will be randomised to groups that either receive the perioperative support programme or usual care. The intervention consists of four face-to-face intervention sessions during the hospital stay and two weekly telephone follow-up sessions after discharge. Primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed at baseline and at 4 and 12 weeks after the intervention. Primary outcomes will include psychological distress and secondary outcomes will include caregiving burden, quality of life, coping style and social support. Generalised estimation equation model will be used to analyse the intervention effects. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (LYG2022003). The authors will disseminate the study's findings by publishing them in international scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ChiCTR2200058280.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Song Zhu
- Clinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Chen Yang
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Shihao Chen
- Clinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Lu Kang
- Clinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Tong Li
- Clinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jina Li
- Clinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Lezhi Li
- Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sak-Dankosky N, Sherwood P, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Kvist T. Interventions improving well-being of adult cancer patients' caregivers: A systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2022; 78:2747-2764. [PMID: 35696332 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to determine what kind of psychosocial interventions aimed at improving the well-being of adult cancer patient caregivers were developed, and to describe the methodological characteristics and clinical effectiveness of the interventions which could be included in the nursing care plans. DESIGN Systematic review DATA SOURCES: A systematic search of three databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed papers published between years 2004-2019. REVIEW METHODS The review was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute manual for systematic reviews. Data were extracted and appraised by three reviewers using standardized checklists. Narrative synthesis was used to analyse the data. RESULTS A total of 37 studies underwent analysis. Most of the studies described psychoeducational interventions, designed for patient-caregiver dyads, delivered face-to-face. There was a great variety in caregiver outcomes and measurement tools used. Even though most studies used a randomized controlled design and standardized intervention protocols, many reported problems with recruitment and attrition. Most studies reported that the intervention improved caregiver outcomes, yet the majority of them failed to report effect sizes. CONCLUSION There are currently a plethora of successful interventions available for cancer patient caregivers which can be included to the nursing care plan. Psychoeducational online interventions which include a social support component may have the best potential in supporting caregivers. It is important to address specific caregiver needs at different cancer stages rather than general needs of caregivers in future interventions. IMPACT This review suggests that despite a large number of different interventions which can be included in the nursing care plan to improve the support offered to caregivers, some issues should be addressed while designing an intervention study. The emphasis should be placed on reporting effect sizes, focusing on specific caregiver needs and improving recruitment, retention strategies and sustainability of caregiver interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paula Sherwood
- School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Tarja Kvist
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pinnock H, Murphie P, Vogiatzis I, Poberezhets V. Telemedicine and virtual respiratory care in the era of COVID-19. ERJ Open Res 2022; 8:00111-2022. [PMID: 35891622 PMCID: PMC9131135 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00111-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The World Health Organization defines telemedicine as “an interaction between a health care provider and a patient when the two are separated by distance”. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced a dramatic shift to telephone and video consulting for follow up and routine ambulatory care for reasons of infection control. Short Message Service (“text”) messaging has proved a useful adjunct to remote consulting allowing transfer of photographs and documents. Maintaining non-communicable diseases care is a core component of pandemic preparedness and telemedicine has developed to enable (for example) remote monitoring of sleep apnoea, telemonitoring of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, digital support for asthma self-management, remote delivery of pulmonary rehabilitation. There are multiple exemplars of telehealth instigated rapidly to provide care for people with COVID-19, to manage the spread of the pandemic, or to maintain safe routine diagnostic or treatment services.Despite many positive examples of equivalent functionality and safety, there remain questions about the impact of remote delivery of care on rapport and the longer-term impact on patient/professional relationships. Although telehealth has the potential to contribute to universal health coverage by providing cost-effective accessible care, there is a risk of increasing social health inequalities if the “digital divide” excludes those most in need of care. As we emerge from the pandemic, the balance of remote versus face-to-face consulting, and the specific role of digital health in different clinical and healthcare contexts will evolve. What is clear is that telemedicine in one form or another will be part of the “new norm”.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ahmad MM, Al-Daken LI. Clinical Trial on Mindfulness with Family Caregivers for Patients with Cancer. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2022; 37:304-310. [PMID: 32578037 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01812-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
To examine the effectiveness of a brief mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) and educational interventions (EI) on self-efficacy and burden among family caregivers (FCs) of patients with cancer in Jordan. A quasi-experimental design was conducted. Two interventions were performed: the brief MBIs and the EIs were applied. A sampling of 138 FCs completed the study interventions. The FCs in the mindfulness group demonstrated a significant improvement in measures of self-efficacy and reduction in burden scores. Furthermore, in the EI group, only self-efficacy was significantly higher in the post-test. Burden reduction was significantly higher in the EI group than the mindfulness group. Appropriate supportive interventions should be directed to improve self-efficacy and reduce burden to assist FCs to carry out their crucial role in providing care for their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muayyad M Ahmad
- Clinical Nursing Department, School of Nursing, The University of Jordan, Amman, 11942, Jordan.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Smith TO, Pearson M, Smith MJ, Fletcher J, Irving L, Lister S. Effectiveness of caregiver interventions for people with cancer and non-cancer-related chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Pain 2022; 16:71-83. [PMID: 35111316 PMCID: PMC8801680 DOI: 10.1177/20494637211022771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with chronic pain frequently have difficulties in completing everyday tasks to maintain independence and quality of life. Informal caregivers may provide support to these individuals. However, the effectiveness of interventions to train and support these individuals in caregiving remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the evidence to determine the effectiveness of caregiver interventions to support informal caregivers of people with chronic pain. METHODS A systematic review of published and unpublished literature databases was undertaken (9 April 2021). Trials reporting clinical outcomes of caregiver interventions to train informal caregivers to support community-dwelling people with chronic pain were included. Meta-analysis was undertaken and each outcome was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. RESULTS Twenty-seven studies were eligible (N = 3427 patients). Twenty-four studies assessed patients with cancer pain and three with musculoskeletal pain. No other patient groups were identified. There was very low-quality evidence that caregiver interventions were beneficial for caregiver health-related quality of life (standardised mean difference = 0.26, 95% confidence interval = 0.01 to 0.52; N = 231). There was moderate-quality evidence that caregiving interventions were effective in reducing pain in the short-term (standardised mean difference = 0.16, 95% confidence interval = -0.29 to -0.03). There was low-quality evidence that caregiving interventions had no beneficial effect over usual care for psychological outcomes, fatigue, coping or physical function in the long-term. CONCLUSION Caregiving interventions may be effective for patients and caregivers but only in the shorter-term and for a limited number of outcomes. There is insufficient evidence examining the effectiveness of caregiver interventions for people with non-cancer-related pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toby O. Smith
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Matthew Pearson
- Dynamic Health, Cambridgeshire Community Services, Huntingdon, UK
| | | | - Jessica Fletcher
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lisa Irving
- Physiotherapy Department, Sunderland Royal Hospital, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | - Sarah Lister
- Physiotherapy Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lung Cancer and Self-Management Interventions: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19010536. [PMID: 35010796 PMCID: PMC8744740 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer is the most common cancer worldwide. Evidence suggests self-management (SM) interventions benefit cancer patients. This review aims to determine the effectiveness of SM interventions for lung cancer patients. Method: Searches occurred in PubMed, Cinahl, ProQuest, Psych Info, Scopus, and Medline, using predefined criteria, assessing randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Results: Five hundred and eighty-seven studies were yielded, 10 RCTs met criteria. Of the total patient pool, 1001 of 1089 had Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Six studies tested home-based SM exercise, two studies SM education, and one each for diary utilisation and symptom reporting. Fatigue was the most targeted function. Other functions targeted included exercise capacity, anxiety, depression, quality of life (QoL), sleep quality, and symptom burden. Six studies met their primary endpoints (five SM exercise, one SM education). Positive outcomes are described for fatigue, anxiety/depression, sleep quality, self-efficacy, and exercise capacity. With exception to fatigue, early-stage NSCLC, younger age, female, never smokers, partnered patients experienced increased treatment effect. Conclusions: SM interventions improve outcomes among some lung cancer patients. Interventions targeting fatigue yield benefit despite histology, stage or gender and could encourage broader cohort engagement. Consideration of patient characteristics may predict SM effect. Effectiveness of home-based SM exercise by NSCLC stage and SM tailored to sociodemographic variables requires further research.
Collapse
|
11
|
Matthews M, Reid J, McKeaveney C, Noble H. Knowledge Requirements and Unmet Needs of Informal Caregivers of Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) Receiving Haemodialysis: A Narrative Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 10:healthcare10010057. [PMID: 35052221 PMCID: PMC8775298 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10010057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Patients with end-stage kidney disease receiving haemodialysis rely heavily on informal caregivers to support them living at home. Informal caregiving may exact a toll on caregivers’ physical, emotional, and social well-being, impacting negatively on their overall quality of life. The aim of this narrative review is to report knowledge requirements and needs of informal caregivers of patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) receiving haemodialysis. Methods: The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). Five electronic databases were searched: Web of Science, PsycINFO, Embase, Medline, and CINAHL to identify the experiences and unmet needs of informal caregivers of patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) receiving haemodialysis. Results: Eighteen papers were included in the review and incorporated a range of methodological approaches. There are several gaps in the current literature around knowledge and informational needs and skills required by informal caregivers, such as signs and symptoms of potential complications, dietary requirements, and medication management. Although most research studies in this review illustrate the difficulties and challenges faced by informal caregivers, there is a paucity of information as to which support mechanisms would benefit caregivers. Conclusion: Informal caregivers provide invaluable assistance in supporting people with ESKD undergoing haemodialysis. These informal caregivers however experience multiple unmet needs which has a detrimental effect on their health and negatively influences the extent to which they can adequately care for patients. The development of supportive interventions is essential to ensure that informal caregivers have the requisite knowledge and skills to allow them to carry out their vital role.
Collapse
|
12
|
Howell D. Enabling patients in effective self-management of breathlessness in lung cancer: the neglected pillar of personalized medicine. Lung Cancer Manag 2021; 10:LMT52. [PMID: 34899992 PMCID: PMC8656340 DOI: 10.2217/lmt-2020-0017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Globally, engagement of patients in the self management of disease and symptom problems has become a health policy priority to improve health outcomes in cancer. Unfortunately, little attention has been focused on the provision of self-management support (SMS)in cancer and specifically for complex cancer symptoms such as breathlessness. Current management of breathlessness, which includes treatment of underlying disease, pharmacological agents to address comorbidities and opiates and anxiolytics to change perception and reduce the sense of breathing effort, is inadequate. In this perspective paper, we review the rationale and evidence for a structured, multicomponent SMS program in breathlessness including four components: breathing retraining, enhancing positive coping skills, optimizing exertional capacity and reducing symptom burden and health risks. The integration of SMS in routine lung cancer care is essential to improve breathlessness, reduce psychological distress, suffering and improve quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doris Howell
- Princess Margaret Cancer Research Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kassir ZM, Li J, Harrison C, Johnson JT, Nilsen ML. Disparity of perception of quality of life between head and neck cancer patients and caregivers. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1127. [PMID: 34670507 PMCID: PMC8527693 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08865-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Caregivers are invaluable sources of support for individuals recovering from head and neck cancer (HNC). Accordingly, minimizing caregiver distress is essential to promote the well-being of both caregivers and their patients. This study assessed if psychosocial distress (i.e., anxiety and depression) among HNC caregivers is associated with a difference in how caregivers and their patients perceive patients’ quality of life (QOL) after treatment completion. Methods Caregivers’ and patients’ perceptions of patient QOL were assessed using the University of Washington QOL Questionaire (UWQOL), a validated HNC-specific health-related QOL questionnaire. The survey is interpreted in terms of its two composite scores: a physical QOL score and a social-emotional QOL score with higher scores indicating better QOL. Caregiver anxiety was assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Questionaire-7 (GAD-7) and caregiver depression was assessed using the Patient Health Questionaire 8 (PHQ-8). Patients completed the UWQOL as part of clinic intake while caregivers were asked to complete the UWQOL for their patients in addition to the PHQ-8 and GAD-7 in private. Linear regression was used to analyze the association between differences in caregivers’ and patients’ QOL scores (both social-emotional and physical QOL subscale scores) and GAD-7 and PHQ-8 scores. Results Of 47 caregivers recruited, 42.6% (n = 20) viewed patients’ social-emotional QOL more negatively than patients themselves, while 31.9% viewed patients’ physical QOL more negatively. After controlling for covariates, differences in perception of social-emotional QOL (p = .01) and differences in perception of physical QOL (p = .007) were significantly associated with caregiver depression, but not anxiety. Caregivers who disagreed with patients regarding patients’ social-emotional QOL scored 6.80 points higher on the PHQ8 than agreeing caregivers. Caregivers who disagreed regarding patients’ physical QOL scored 6.09 points higher. Conclusion Caregivers commonly view patients’ QOL more negatively than patients themselves. These caregivers tend to have greater psychosocial distress than caregivers who agree with their patients. Interventions designed to identify and aid at-risk caregivers are critically needed. We propose screening for differences in perception of patient QOL as a way of identifying distressed caregivers as well as provider-facilitated communication between patients and caregivers as possible interventions that should be examined in future research. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08865-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary M Kassir
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Eye & Ear Institute, 203 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Jinhong Li
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, 130 De Soto Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA
| | - Christine Harrison
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Eye & Ear Institute, 203 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Jonas T Johnson
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Eye & Ear Institute, 203 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Marci L Nilsen
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Eye & Ear Institute, 203 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. .,Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, 318A Victoria Building, 3500 Victoria Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sakuma H, Hasuo H, Fukunaga M. Effect of handholding on heart rate variability in both patients with cancer and their family caregivers: a randomized crossover study. Biopsychosoc Med 2021; 15:14. [PMID: 34556144 PMCID: PMC8461863 DOI: 10.1186/s13030-021-00217-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many family caregivers of patients with cancer feel guilty about self-care. A meaningful relationship with patients reduces such negative feelings and functions as self-care for family caregivers. Moreover, handholding improves autonomic functions in non-cancer patients. However, the effects of handholding on both patients with cancer and family caregivers remain unknown. METHODS We evaluated the effects of handholding on heart rate variability (HRV) in patients with cancer and their family caregivers. This randomized crossover study divided patients with cancer and their family caregivers into two trial groups: Handholding trial (the family caregiver holds the patient's hand for five minutes) and Beside trial (the family caregiver stays beside the patient without holding their hand). The study included 37 pairs of patients with cancer who received treatment in the cancer department of a university hospital in Japan and their family caregivers (n = 74). The primary end-point was the change in HRV before and during the intervention. RESULTS The median performance status of the patients was 3. An interaction was observed between trials in the standard deviation of the normal-to-normal interval (SDNN) of HRV for family caregivers (F = 7.669; p = 0.006), and a significant difference in time course was observed between the trials (before p = 0.351; during p = 0.003). No interaction was observed between trials in the SDNN for patients (F = 0.331; p = 0.566). Only a main effect in time course (F = 6.254; p = 0.014) was observed. SDNN increased significantly during the intervention in both trials (Handholding trial: p = 0.002, Beside trial: p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS Handholding improves autonomic functions of family caregivers and may function as self-care for family caregivers. TRIAL REGISTRATION UMIN000020557 . Registered on January 15, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroko Sakuma
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Shinmachi 2-5-1, Osaka, 573-1090, Hirakata, Japan
| | - Hideaki Hasuo
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Shinmachi 2-5-1, Osaka, 573-1090, Hirakata, Japan.
| | - Mikihiko Fukunaga
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Shinmachi 2-5-1, Osaka, 573-1090, Hirakata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Song L, Qan'ir Y, Guan T, Guo P, Xu S, Jung A, Idiagbonya E, Song F, Kent EE. The Challenges of Enrollment and Retention: A Systematic Review of Psychosocial Behavioral Interventions for Patients With Cancer and Their Family Caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 62:e279-e304. [PMID: 33933618 PMCID: PMC8419067 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Psychosocial behavioral interventions (PBIs) that target patients with cancer and their caregivers face challenges in participant enrollment and retention. OBJECTIVES 1) Describe characteristics of the patient-caregiver PBI studies; 2) examine participant enrollment and retention rates; 3) identify factors influencing participant enrollment and retention rates; and 4) explore the strategies to promote enrollment and retention rates. METHODS We identified randomized controlled trials that tested PBIs among adult patients with cancer and caregivers in five electronic databases. We conducted narrative and quantitative analyses to synthesize our findings. RESULTS Among 55 qualified studies reviewed, most tested the efficacy of PBIs (n = 42) and used two study arms (n = 48). In-person meeting was the most common PBI delivery mode. The primary outcomes included quality of life, physical health, and symptoms. The average of enrollment rates of patient-caregiver dyads was 33% across studies (range 8%-100%; median = 23%). The average retention rate at the end of follow-ups was 69% (range 16%-100%; median = 70%). The number of study arms, recruitment method, type of patient-caregiver relationship, and intervention duration influenced enrollment rates. Study design (efficacy vs. pilot), follow-up duration, mode of delivery, type of relationship, and intervention duration influenced retention rates. Sixteen studies reported retention strategies, including providing money/gift cards upon study completion and/or after follow-up survey, and excluding patients with advanced cancer. CONCLUSION Researchers need to incorporate effective strategies to optimize enrollment and retention in patient-caregiver PBI trials. Researchers need to report detailed study processes and PBI information to improve research transparency and increase consistency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lixin Song
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
| | - Yousef Qan'ir
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ting Guan
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Social Work, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Peiran Guo
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Shenmeng Xu
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ahrang Jung
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eno Idiagbonya
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Fengyu Song
- West Coast University, General Education, Anaheim, California, USA
| | - Erin Elizabeth Kent
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hovadick AC, Jardim VR, Paúl C, Pagano A, Reis I, Torres H. Interventions to improve the well-being of family caregivers of patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review. PeerJ 2021; 9:e11713. [PMID: 34322322 PMCID: PMC8300494 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The family caregivers of patients on hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) typically experience higher burden than the general population because of the nature of tasks these caregivers need to carry out as a part of homecare. This fact influences both the caregivers’ quality of life and the quality of their care toward the patient. Thus, this study aimed to review the effectiveness and limitations of interventions in improving the well-being of family caregivers of patients on HD and PD. Methodology A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 5.1.0). The Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, MEDLINE, VHL Regional Portal, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched queried for randomized controlled trials that developed interventions aimed at improving the well-being of family caregivers of patients undergoing HD and/or PD from 2009 to 2020. The study protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration no. CRD42020151161). Results Six studies met the inclusion criteria, all of which addressed caregivers of patients undergoing HD. All interventions reported in the included studies were carried out in group sessions, which addressed topics such as patient assistance and care, treatment complications, coping strategies, caregiver self-care practices, problem solving, and self-efficacy. The studies found significant improvement in the caregiver’s well-being. Conclusions Group session interventions are effective in improving the well-being of family caregivers of patients undergoing HD. In regard to PD, there is insufficient evidence to make recommendations for caregivers of patients with this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Carolina Hovadick
- Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Viviane Rodrigues Jardim
- Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Constança Paúl
- Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade de Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Adriana Pagano
- Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Ilka Reis
- Instituto de Ciências Exatas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Heloisa Torres
- Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Thomas Hebdon MC, Coombs LA, Reed P, Crane TE, Badger TA. Self-efficacy in caregivers of adults diagnosed with cancer: An integrative review. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2021; 52:101933. [PMID: 33799022 PMCID: PMC8475617 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer caregivers experience health challenges related to their caregiving role, and self-efficacy can contribute to health outcomes through behavioral, environmental, and personal factors. The purpose of this integrative review was to examine self-efficacy in caregivers of adults diagnosed with cancer, including its association with health factors. METHOD A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, and PsychInfo yielded 560 articles. Following duplicate removal, 232 articles were screened for inclusion criteria with 71 articles remaining for final review. RESULTS Studies were generally quantitative (n = 67), with predominantly female (n = 55), White (n = 36) caregivers, between the ages of 45-60 (n = 48). Self-efficacy was significantly associated with quality of life, caregiver function, social support, hope, depression, anxiety, and burden as a predictor, mediator, and outcome. Physical health and social determinants of health (social support and financial well-being) were addressed among fewer studies than mental and emotional health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Addressing self-efficacy in diverse populations and within physical, mental, and social health contexts will enhance understanding of how self-efficacy impacts caregivers of adults diagnosed with cancer. Nurses and other health care professionals can then effectively address supportive needs of caregivers in the personal, behavioral, and environmental domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lorinda A Coombs
- University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, School of Nursing, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, USA.
| | - Pamela Reed
- University of Arizona College of Nursing, 1305 N. Martin Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
| | - Tracy E Crane
- University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, School of Nursing, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, USA.
| | - Terry A Badger
- University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, School of Nursing, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Graven LJ, Glueckauf RL, Regal RA, Merbitz NK, Lustria MLA, James BA. Telehealth Interventions for Family Caregivers of Persons with Chronic Health Conditions: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Int J Telemed Appl 2021; 2021:3518050. [PMID: 34093704 PMCID: PMC8164532 DOI: 10.1155/2021/3518050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to provide an in-depth analysis of the components and outcomes of telehealth interventions for family caregivers of individuals with chronic health conditions. METHODS A systematic review of 17 databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials published between January 2002 and January 2017. Interventions were analyzed based on type of telecommunication modality, caregiver and care recipient characteristics, intervention components, and caregiver outcomes. RESULTS A total of 57 articles met criteria for inclusion. Telephone was the most frequently used mode of telehealth delivery and focused primarily on caregivers of older adults with dementia and stroke. Skills training was the most prevalent treatment strategy across telephone, web, and combined telephone and web modalities. Improved psychological functioning was reported most frequently across telehealth modalities. CONCLUSION Telehealth is an effective tool in delivering caregiver interventions and leads to significant improvement in caregiver outcomes. Telephone was used most often to deliver cognitive-behavioral and psychoeducational strategies as compared to web and combined telephone and web modalities. Further research is needed to examine the effects of telehealth interventions on caregiving skills and self-efficacy, as well as health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Nancy K. Merbitz
- Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mia L. A. Lustria
- Florida State University College of Communication and Information, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Samuelsson M, Wennick A, Jakobsson J, Bengtsson M. Models of support to family members during the trajectory of cancer: A scoping review. J Clin Nurs 2021; 30:3072-3098. [PMID: 33973285 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To map the existing literature on support models provided to family members during the cancer trajectory. BACKGROUND Cancer diagnosis, treatment and survivorship have a profound influence on the surrounding family members. This scoping review is part of the development of a support model for family members of persons diagnosed with colorectal cancer. DESIGN The method was guided by the Arksey and O'Malley framework, described in the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, and the reporting is compliant with PRISMA-ScR Checklist. Searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL and PsycINFO from November 2019-February 2020 with no limitation in publication year or study design. Complementing searches were conducted in reference lists and for grey literature, followed by an additional search in September 2020. Inclusion criteria were primary research about support provided by health care, to family members, during cancer, of an adult person, in Swedish or English, of moderate or high methodological quality. Quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Data were extracted using a charting form. RESULT A total of 32 studies were included in the review describing 39 support models. CONCLUSION The mapping of the existing literature resulted in the identification of three themes of support models: psychoeducation, caregiver training and psychological support. In addition, that future research should target a specific diagnosis and trajectory phase as well as include family members and intervention providers in model development. RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE Knowledge from the literature on both the needs of the family members and existing support models should be incorporated with the prerequisites of clinical practice. Clinical practice should also be complemented with structured assessments of family members' needs conducted regularly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Samuelsson
- Faculty of Health and Society, Department of Care Science, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Pediatrics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Anne Wennick
- Faculty of Health and Society, Department of Care Science, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Jenny Jakobsson
- Faculty of Health and Society, Department of Care Science, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Mariette Bengtsson
- Faculty of Health and Society, Department of Care Science, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cochrane A, Reid O, Woods S, Gallagher P, Dunne S. Variables associated with distress amongst informal caregivers of people with lung cancer: A systematic review of the literature. Psychooncology 2021; 30:1246-1261. [PMID: 33945184 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Informal caregivers of people with lung cancer often experience a substantial care burden and associated negative consequences due to the often-contracted course of the disease. The objective of this review was to systematically examine the evidence on the factors associated with lung cancer caregiver distress. METHODS Five databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsychINFO and Web of Science) were searched for studies investigating factors associated with distress amongst caregivers of people with lung cancer. Empirical studies published up to July 2020 were included if they measured distress using a valid and reliable measure and examined its association with at least one other factor, with a sample of 50 or more caregivers. RESULTS Thirty publications describing 27 studies (16 cross-sectional; 6 prospective; 8 intervention) involving 3744 caregivers (primarily spouse or adult child) were included. A narrative synthesis of the findings is presented due to heterogeneity in study design, variables measured and analyses conducted. Patient variables associated with greater distress included: stage of cancer and quality of spousal relationship. Caregiver variables associated with higher distress included: social support, coping strategies and self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS Several variables were associated with distress amongst lung cancer caregivers. Understanding these variables could inform the development of interventions that will enable caregivers to care effectively while maintaining their own well-being. Screening for distress among caregivers may identify those caregivers who would benefit from early intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy Cochrane
- School of Psychology, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - Olivia Reid
- School of Psychology, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - Siobhan Woods
- School of Psychology, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | | | - Simon Dunne
- School of Psychology, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Porter LS, Steel JL, Fairclough DL, LeBlanc TW, Bull J, Hanson LC, Fischer S, Keefe FJ. Caregiver-guided pain coping skills training for patients with advanced cancer: Results from a randomized clinical trial. Palliat Med 2021; 35:952-961. [PMID: 33775175 PMCID: PMC8265951 DOI: 10.1177/02692163211004216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain is a major concern among patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers. Evidence suggests that pain coping skills training interventions can improve outcomes, however they have rarely been tested in this population. AIM To test the efficacy of a caregiver-guided pain coping skills training intervention. The primary outcome was caregiver self-efficacy for helping the patient manage pain. DESIGN A randomized controlled trial compared the intervention to an enhanced treatment-as-usual control. Dyads in both conditions received pain education, and those in the intervention received three sessions of pain coping skills training. Caregiver outcomes (self-efficacy; caregiver strain, caregiving satisfaction, psychological distress) and patient outcomes (self-efficacy, pain intensity and interference, psychological distress) were collected at baseline and post-intervention. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Two hundred two patients with stage III-IV cancer and pain and their family caregivers were enrolled from four outpatient oncology clinics and a free-standing hospice/palliative care organization. RESULTS Compared to those in the control arm, caregivers in the intervention reported significant increases in caregiving satisfaction (p < 0.01) and decreased anxiety (p = 0.04). In both conditions, caregivers reported improvements in self-efficacy, and patients reported improvements in self-efficacy, pain severity and interference, and psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to test a pain coping skills intervention targeted to patients and caregivers facing advanced cancer. Findings suggest that pain education provides benefits for patients and caregivers, and coping skills training may be beneficial for caregivers. Further research is needed to optimize the benefits of education and pain coping skills training for improving cancer pain outcomes.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02430467, Caregiver-Guided Pain Management Training in Palliative Care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Janet Bull
- Four Seasons Compassion for Life, Hendersonville, NC, USA
| | - Laura C Hanson
- Division of Geriatric Medicine & Palliative Care Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hofman A, Zajdel N, Klekowski J, Chabowski M. Improving Social Support to Increase QoL in Lung Cancer Patients. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:2319-2327. [PMID: 33732024 PMCID: PMC7959197 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s278087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer deaths in the world. According to the World Health Organization, over 2 million new lung cancer cases were reported worldwide in 2018, and there were 1.76 million deaths from the disease. Due to its non-specific symptoms, the disease is usually detected at an advanced stage, which gives few treatment options and a short survival rate after diagnosis. That is why improving QoL in the last months of a patient's life is enormously important. The purpose of this study was to analyse original papers in order to determine whether an increase in social support is important in improving QoL for lung cancer patients. Both the direct influence of social support on QoL and indirect influences such as stigma or depression, etc. were taken into consideration. We conducted a review of 22 papers published in English in the period 2005-2020, which were selected using the following keywords: lung cancer, social support, quality of life. Evidence was found for the connections between the improvement of social support and an increase in the QoL of lung cancer patients. It is crucial, and worth whatever effort is required, to increase social support for lung cancer patients, as it is one of the most important factors in improving QoL. According to the studies, a good QoL and minimalised symptoms of the disease are much more important for lung cancer patients than the length of their life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana Hofman
- Student Research Group No 180, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Natalia Zajdel
- Student Research Group No 180, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Jakub Klekowski
- Student Research Group No 180, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Mariusz Chabowski
- Division of Oncology and Palliative Care, Department of Clinical Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.,Department of Surgery, 4th Military Teaching Hospital, Wrocław, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cheng CT, Ho SM, Lai Y, Zhang Q, Wang GL. Coping profiles predict long-term anxiety trajectory in breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:4045-4053. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05936-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
24
|
Acknowledging cancer as a family disease: A systematic review of family care in the cancer setting. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2020; 49:101841. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
25
|
Kumar J, Alam MM, Johnson KC. Nonpharmacological Interventions for Pain Management in Lung Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review. Indian J Palliat Care 2020; 26:444-456. [PMID: 33623305 PMCID: PMC7888434 DOI: 10.4103/ijpc.ijpc_24_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The presence of lung cancer is almost always associated with pain, a symptom that causes severe distress in patients. Although many pharmacological methods are available to manage pain in this oncologic population, the medications often cause undesirable sideeffects and inadequate relief. Nonpharmacological interventions can be used as adjuvants to pharmacological interventions in reducing pain and increasing quality of life. Objectives: The purpose of this review is to compare the efficacy of nonpharmacological interventions in reducing pain in lung cancer patients. Materials and Methods: This is a systematic review study guided by the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol. Interventions identified in the present systematic review have been categorized as physical treatment, technologybased, cognitive behavioral, coping, and coaching. Results: Results indicate that the nonpharmacological interventions such as physical treatment interventions, selfmanagement and coaching interventions, cognitive behavioral interventions, and technologybased interventions or coping skills interventions had limited and shortterm effects on alleviating pain among the patients. However, previous studies have provided limited evidence regarding nonpharmacologic therapy due to the lack of a comparison group, small sample sizes, and lack of longterm followup periods to determine whether sustained effects are feasible. Conclusion: Healthcare professionals should consider additional research on the added advantage of utilizing the nonpharmacological interventions as an adjunct option while managing pain in lung cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayaprakash Kumar
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA
| | - Mohammad Masudul Alam
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, USA
| | - Karen Chandler Johnson
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Exploring the caregiver's experience in an innovative homebound hematopoietic stem cell transplantation program. Palliat Support Care 2020; 19:397-404. [PMID: 33118909 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951520000954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Home care for hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs), an alternative to traditional inpatient or outpatient recovery programs, is safe and feasible but may place greater demand on full-time caregivers. The goal of this study was to characterize the experiences of caregivers in a newly piloted homebound HSCT program as a means of identifying unmet needs and ensuring adequate support. METHOD A qualitative approach was utilized. Participants created self-recorded video diaries guided by open-ended prompts at designated time points throughout recovery and participated in a single follow-up interview within four weeks post-discharge. Diaries and interviews were transcribed, analyzed, and coded to identify recurrent ideas and themes. RESULTS Data were collected from 12 caregivers of homebound HSCT patients. Thematic content analysis yielded four themes: facilitators (external support, sense of normalcy, and patient wellness), challenges (difficulties with transplant care instructions, managing the patient's physical and emotional health, and caregiver psychological distress), roles in recovery (caregiving responsibilities), and analysis of homebound experience (positive outcomes and suggestions for improvement). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS Caregivers perceived the homebound program as offering high-quality medical care in a setting that provided a sense of normalcy, privacy, and greater level of oversight. Unmet needs included lacking preparedness in completing nursing responsibilities and handling caregiver and patient distress. While the homebound program was preferred to routine hospital care, psychotherapeutic support and programming to improve caregiver preparedness in a homebound HSCT recovery program is indicated.
Collapse
|
27
|
van de Wiel M, Derijcke S, Galdermans D, Daenen M, Surmont V, De Droogh E, Lefebure A, Saenen E, Vandenbroucke E, Morel AM, Sadowska A, van Meerbeeck JP, Janssens A. Coping Strategy Influences Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer by Mediating Mood. Clin Lung Cancer 2020; 22:e146-e152. [PMID: 33060059 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with advanced lung cancer experience high physical symptom burden with substantial psychological distress. Depressive and anxiety symptoms are common and associated with worse quality of life (QoL). Early palliative care (EPC) addresses the complex supportive care needs improving QoL and mood. The mechanisms of EPC are uncertain. We examined whether and how coping strategy, a primary component of EPC, influenced QoL in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional study of patients with advanced lung cancer. A total of 125 patients completed assessments of QoL (QLQ-C15-PAL), depressive and anxiety symptoms (HADS), and coping (brief COPE questionnaire). The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics. To determine whether and how coping strategy influences QoL, correlations and logistic regressions were performed. RESULTS Positive reframing correlates significantly with global QoL (r = 0.25, P < .01), emotional well-being (r = 0.33, P < .01), pain (r = -0.30, P < .01), fatigue (r = -0.22, P < .01), loss of appetite (r = -0.22, P < .01) and nausea (r = -0.24, P < .01). Self-blame correlates significantly with worse emotional well-being (r = -0.19, P < .05) and insomnia (r = 0.19, P < .05). Using a 4-step logistic regression model, it was found that anxiety and depressive symptoms fully mediated the relationship between positive reframing and QoL. CONCLUSIONS Patients with advanced lung cancer using positive reframing as coping strategy, experience higher QoL. The mechanism behind it seems that positive reframing goes along with less anxiety and depressive symptoms leading to a better QoL. Self-blame leads to more insomnia and worse emotional well-being. Providing skills to cope effectively could impact QoL in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mick van de Wiel
- University Hospital Antwerp, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Edegem, Belgium.
| | - Sofie Derijcke
- Department of Pulmonology-Thoracic Oncology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Daniella Galdermans
- Department of Pulmonology-Thoracic Oncology, ZNA Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marc Daenen
- Department of Pulmonology, Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - Veerle Surmont
- Department of Pulmonology-Thoracic Oncology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Els De Droogh
- Department of Pulmonology-Thoracic Oncology, ZNA Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Anneke Lefebure
- Department of Pulmonology-Thoracic Oncology, ZNA STER, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Erika Saenen
- Lung diseases/Allergology, AZ Heilige Familie, Reet, Belgium
| | - Elke Vandenbroucke
- Department of Pulmonology-Thoracic Oncology, AZ Monica, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ann-Marie Morel
- Department of Pulmonology, Sint-Jozefkliniek Bornem & Willebroek, Bornem, Belgium
| | - Anna Sadowska
- Department of Pulmonology, Ziekenhuis Maas en Kempen, Campus Maaseik, Maaseik, Belgium
| | - Jan P van Meerbeeck
- University Hospital Antwerp, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Annelies Janssens
- University Hospital Antwerp, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Edegem, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cheng C, Ho RTH, Guo Y, Zhu M, Yang W, Li Y, Liu Z, Zhuo S, Liang Q, Chen Z, Zeng Y, Yang J, Zhang Z, Zhang X, Monroe-Wise A, Yeung SC. Development and Feasibility of a Mobile Health-Supported Comprehensive Intervention Model (CIMmH) for Improving the Quality of Life of Patients With Esophageal Cancer After Esophagectomy: Prospective, Single-Arm, Nonrandomized Pilot Study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e18946. [PMID: 32808933 PMCID: PMC7463393 DOI: 10.2196/18946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Revised: 06/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with esophageal cancer often experience clinically relevant deterioration of quality of life (QOL) after esophagectomy owing to malnutrition, lack of physical exercise, and psychological symptoms. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a comprehensive intervention model using a mobile health system (CIMmH) in patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy. METHODS Twenty patients with esophageal cancer undergoing the modified McKeown surgical procedure were invited to join the CIMmH program with both online and offline components for 12 weeks. The participants were assessed before surgery and again at 1 and 3 months after esophagectomy. QOL, depressive symptoms, anxiety, stress, nutrition, and physical fitness were measured. RESULTS Of the 20 patients, 16 (80%) completed the program. One month after esophagectomy, patients showed significant deterioration in overall QOL (P=.02), eating (P=.005), reflux (P=.04), and trouble with talking (P<.001). At the 3-month follow-up, except for pain (P=.02), difficulty with eating (P=.03), dry mouth (P=.04), and trouble with talking (P=.003), all other QOL dimensions returned to the preoperative level. There were significant reductions in weight (P<.001) and BMI (P=.02) throughout the study, and no significant changes were observed for physical fitness measured by change in the 6-minute walk distance between baseline and the 1-month follow-up (P=.22) or between baseline and the 3-month follow-up (P=.52). Depressive symptoms significantly increased 1 month after surgery (P<.001), while other psychological measures did not show relevant changes. Although there were declines in many measures 1 month after surgery, these were much improved at the 3-month follow-up, and the recovery was more profound and faster than with traditional rehabilitation programs. CONCLUSIONS The CIMmH was feasible and safe and demonstrated encouraging efficacy testing with a control group for enhancing recovery after surgery among patients with esophageal cancer in China. TRIAL REGISTRATION Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-IPR-1800019900); http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=32811.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Cheng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rainbow Tin Hung Ho
- Department of Social Work & Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.,Centre on Behavioral Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yan Guo
- Department of Medical statistics, School of Public Health, Sun-Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Sun Yat-sen Center for Migrant Health Policy, Guangzhou, China.,Sun Yat-sen Center for Global Health, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mengting Zhu
- Department of Medical statistics, School of Public Health, Sun-Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weixiong Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yiran Li
- Department of Medical statistics, School of Public Health, Sun-Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenguo Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuyu Zhuo
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qi Liang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenghong Chen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu Zeng
- Department of Medical statistics, School of Public Health, Sun-Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiali Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhanfei Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xu Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Aliza Monroe-Wise
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Sai-Ching Yeung
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Milbury K, Li Y, Durrani S, Liao Z, Tsao AS, Carmack C, Cohen L, Bruera E. A Mindfulness-Based Intervention as a Supportive Care Strategy for Patients with Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Their Spouses: Results of a Three-Arm Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Oncologist 2020; 25:e1794-e1802. [PMID: 32621630 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although mindfulness-based interventions have been widely examined in patients with nonmetastatic cancer, the feasibility and efficacy of these types of programs are largely unknown for those with advanced disease. We pilot-tested a couple-based meditation (CBM) relative to a supportive-expressive (SE) and a usual care (UC) arm targeting psychospiritual distress in patients with metastatic lung cancer and their spousal caregivers. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-five patient-caregiver dyads completed baseline self-report measures and were then randomized to one of the three arms. Couples in the CBM and SE groups attended four 60-minute sessions that were delivered via videoconference. All dyads were reassessed 1 and 3 months later. RESULTS A priori feasibility benchmarks were met. Although attendance was high in both groups, dyads in the CBM group indicated greater benefit of the sessions than those in the SE group (patients, CBM mean = 2.63, SE mean = 2.20, p = .003; spouses, CBM mean = 2.71, SE mean = 2.00, p = .005). Compared with the UC group, patients in the CBM group reported significantly lower depressive symptoms (p = .05; d = 0.53) and marginally reduced cancer-related stress (p = .07; d = 0.68). Medium effect sizes in favor of the CBM compared with the SE group for depressive symptoms (d = 0.59) and cancer-related stress (d = 0.54) were found. Spouses in the CBM group reported significantly lower depressive symptoms (p < .01; d = 0.74) compared with those in the UC group. CONCLUSION It seems feasible and possibly efficacious to deliver dyadic interventions via videoconference to couples coping with metastatic lung cancer. Mindfulness-based interventions may be of value to managing psychological symptoms in the palliative care setting. Clinical trial identification number. NCT02596490 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The current randomized controlled trial has established that a mindfulness approach to the management of patients' and spouses' psychospiritual concerns is acceptable and subjectively deemed more beneficial than a supportive-expressive treatment for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We also revealed that videoconference delivery, here FaceTime, is an acceptable approach even for geriatric patients with metastatic NSCLC and that patients and their spousal caregivers prefer a dyadic delivery of this type of supportive care strategy. Lastly, this trial has laid the foundation for the role of mindfulness-based interventions in the palliative care setting supporting patients with advanced NSCLC and their spousal caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Milbury
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yisheng Li
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sania Durrani
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Zhongxing Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anne S Tsao
- Department of Head and Neck/Thoracic Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Cindy Carmack
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lorenzo Cohen
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Eduardo Bruera
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ream E, Hughes AE, Cox A, Skarparis K, Richardson A, Pedersen VH, Wiseman T, Forbes A, Bryant A. Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 6:CD007568. [PMID: 32483832 PMCID: PMC7264015 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007568.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with cancer experience a variety of symptoms as a result of their disease and the therapies involved in its management. Inadequate symptom management has implications for patient outcomes including functioning, psychological well-being, and quality of life (QoL). Attempts to reduce the incidence and severity of cancer symptoms have involved the development and testing of psycho-educational interventions to enhance patients' symptom self-management. With the trend for care to be provided nearer patients' homes, telephone-delivered psycho-educational interventions have evolved to provide support for the management of a range of cancer symptoms. Early indications suggest that these can reduce symptom severity and distress through enhanced symptom self-management. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of telephone-delivered interventions for reducing symptoms associated with cancer and its treatment. To determine which symptoms are most responsive to telephone interventions. To determine whether certain configurations (e.g. with/without additional support such as face-to-face, printed or electronic resources) and duration/frequency of intervention calls mediate observed cancer symptom outcome effects. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2019, Issue 1); MEDLINE via OVID (1946 to January 2019); Embase via OVID (1980 to January 2019); (CINAHL) via Athens (1982 to January 2019); British Nursing Index (1984 to January 2019); and PsycINFO (1989 to January 2019). We searched conference proceedings to identify published abstracts, as well as SIGLE and trial registers for unpublished studies. We searched the reference lists of all included articles for additional relevant studies. Finally, we handsearched the following journals: Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Psycho-oncology, Cancer Practice, Cancer Nursing, Oncology Nursing Forum, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, and Palliative Medicine. We restricted our search to publications published in English. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared one or more telephone interventions with one other, or with other types of interventions (e.g. a face-to-face intervention) and/or usual care, with the stated aim of addressing any physical or psychological symptoms of cancer and its treatment, which recruited adults (over 18 years) with a clinical diagnosis of cancer, regardless of tumour type, stage of cancer, type of treatment, and time of recruitment (e.g. before, during, or after treatment). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used Cochrane methods for trial selection, data extraction and analysis. When possible, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, emotional distress, pain, uncertainty, sexually-related and lung cancer symptoms as well as secondary outcomes are reported as standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and we presented a descriptive synthesis of study findings. We reported on findings according to symptoms addressed and intervention types (e.g. telephone only, telephone combined with other elements). As many studies included small samples, and because baseline scores for study outcomes often varied for intervention and control groups, we used change scores and associated standard deviations. The certainty of the evidence for each outcome was interpreted using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MAIN RESULTS Thirty-two studies were eligible for inclusion; most had moderate risk of bias,often related to blinding. Collectively, researchers recruited 6250 people and studied interventions in people with a variety of cancer types and across the disease trajectory, although many participants had breast cancer or early-stage cancer and/or were starting treatment. Studies measured symptoms of anxiety, depression, emotional distress, uncertainty, fatigue, and pain, as well as sexually-related symptoms and general symptom intensity and/or distress. Interventions were primarily delivered by nurses (n = 24), most of whom (n = 16) had a background in oncology, research, or psychiatry. Ten interventions were delivered solely by telephone; the rest combined telephone with additional elements (i.e. face-to-face consultations and digital/online/printed resources). The number of calls delivered ranged from 1 to 18; most interventions provided three or four calls. Twenty-one studies provided evidence on effectiveness of telephone-delivered interventions and the majority appeared to reduce symptoms of depression compared to control. Nine studies contributed quantitative change scores (CSs) and associated standard deviation results (or these could be calculated). Likewise, many telephone interventions appeared effective when compared to control in reducing anxiety (16 studies; 5 contributed quantitative CS results); fatigue (9 studies; 6 contributed to quantitative CS results); and emotional distress (7 studies; 5 contributed quantitative CS results). Due to significant clinical heterogeneity with regards to interventions introduced, study participants recruited, and outcomes measured, meta-analysis was not conducted. For other symptoms (uncertainty, pain, sexually-related symptoms, dyspnoea, and general symptom experience), evidence was limited; similarly meta-analysis was not possible, and results from individual studies were largely conflicting, making conclusions about their management through telephone-delivered interventions difficult to draw. Heterogeneity was considerable across all trials for all outcomes. Overall, the certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes in the review. Outcomes were all downgraded due to concerns about overall risk of bias profiles being frequently unclear, uncertainty in effect estimates and due to some inconsistencies in results and general heterogeneity. Unsubstantiated evidence suggests that telephone interventions in some capacity may have a place in symptom management for adults with cancer. However, in the absence of reliable and homogeneous evidence, caution is needed in interpreting the narrative synthesis. Further, there were no clear patterns across studies regarding which forms of interventions (telephone alone versus augmented with other elements) are most effective. It is impossible to conclude with any certainty which forms of telephone intervention are most effective in managing the range of cancer-related symptoms that people with cancer experience. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Telephone interventions provide a convenient way of supporting self-management of cancer-related symptoms for adults with cancer. These interventions are becoming more important with the shift of care closer to patients' homes, the need for resource/cost containment, and the potential for voluntary sector providers to deliver healthcare interventions. Some evidence supports the use of telephone-delivered interventions for symptom management for adults with cancer; most evidence relates to four commonly experienced symptoms - depression, anxiety, emotional distress, and fatigue. Some telephone-delivered interventions were augmented by combining them with face-to-face meetings and provision of printed or digital materials. Review authors were unable to determine whether telephone alone or in combination with other elements provides optimal reduction in symptoms; it appears most likely that this will vary by symptom. It is noteworthy that, despite the potential for telephone interventions to deliver cost savings, none of the studies reviewed included any form of health economic evaluation. Further robust and adequately reported trials are needed across all cancer-related symptoms, as the certainty of evidence generated in studies within this review was very low, and reporting was of variable quality. Researchers must strive to reduce variability between studies in the future. Studies in this review are characterised by clinical and methodological diversity; the level of this diversity hindered comparison across studies. At the very least, efforts should be made to standardise outcome measures. Finally, studies were compromised by inclusion of small samples, inadequate concealment of group allocation, lack of observer blinding, and short length of follow-up. Consequently, conclusions related to symptoms most amenable to management by telephone-delivered interventions are tentative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Ream
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | | | - Anna Cox
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Katy Skarparis
- Department of Nursing, Midwifery & Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Alison Richardson
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Vibe H Pedersen
- Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Theresa Wiseman
- Health Services Research, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Angus Forbes
- Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew Bryant
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zanini C, Fiordelli M, Amann J, Brach M, Gemperli A, Rubinelli S. Coping strategies of family caregivers in spinal cord injury: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2020; 44:243-252. [PMID: 32449426 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1764638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: To identify the coping strategies used by family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Switzerland in order to develop tailored support programs.Materials and methods: Purposive sample of >18 years participants, speaking an official Swiss language fluently, being family caregivers of persons with SCI for at least 4 years, and perceiving either a high or low burden in relation to caregiving. Data were collected through face-to-face semi-structured interviews (N = 22). Thematic analysis was performed.Results: Four main coping strategies were identified: reappraisal, active acceptance, setting limits to the caregiver role, and seeking support. These strategies can be used one at a time or combined, and at different times of a caregiver pathway. Our analysis highlighted that caregivers need skills to implement these strategies (e.g., self-evaluation skills).Conclusions: Caregivers of persons with SCI develop cognitive coping strategies to make sense of the situation and establish a "new normal" and problem-focused coping strategies to deal with their new tasks and role. These strategies do not seem to be typical only of SCI caregivers. Hence, interventions that worked for caregivers in other fields could be adapted. Rehabilitation centers should systematically integrate programs targeted to caregivers into their offerings.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONHealthcare systems need to develop educational and support measures for both persons with a health condition and their caregivers.Caregivers should become long-term partners in rehabilitation and a regular and structured needs assessment should be offered.Interventions that worked for caregivers in other fields can be adapted to support also caregivers in SCI.Educational and support programs dedicated to caregivers should teach not only how to perform caregiving tasks but also how to balance between responding to the care recipient's needs and their own needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Zanini
- Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.,Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Maddalena Fiordelli
- Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.,Institute of Communication and Health, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Julia Amann
- Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.,Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Health Ethics and Policy Lab, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mirjam Brach
- Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.,Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Armin Gemperli
- Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.,Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Sara Rubinelli
- Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.,Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Shelby RA, Dorfman CS, Arthur SS, Bosworth HB, Corsino L, Sutton L, Owen L, Erkanli A, Keefe F, Corbett C, Kimmick G. Improving health engagement and lifestyle management for breast cancer survivors with diabetes. Contemp Clin Trials 2020; 92:105998. [PMID: 32289471 PMCID: PMC7590108 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer survivors with type 2 diabetes are at high risk for cancer recurrence, serious health complications, more severe symptoms, psychological distress, and premature death relative to breast cancer survivors without diabetes. Maintaining glycemic control is critical for decreasing symptoms and preventing serious health problems. Many breast cancer survivors with type 2 diabetes have difficulty maintaining diabetes self-management behaviors and achieving glycemic control. Both cancer and diabetes-related symptoms (e.g., physical symptoms and psychological distress) are often barriers to engaging in diabetes self-management strategies. This study evaluates a novel diabetes coping skills training (DCST) intervention for improving breast cancer survivors' abilities to manage symptoms and adhere to recommended diabetes self-management behaviors. The telephone-based DCST protocol integrates three key theory-based strategies: coping skills training for managing symptoms, adherence skills training, and healthy lifestyle skills training. A randomized clinical trial will test the DCST intervention plus diabetes education by comparing it to diabetes education alone. Symptoms, distress, diabetes self-management behaviors, and self-efficacy will be assessed at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) will be assessed at baseline, 6, and 12 months. This study addresses a critical gap in the care of breast cancer survivors by evaluating a novel behavioral intervention to improve the management of symptoms, adherence, and glycemic control in breast cancer survivors with type 2 diabetes. Special considerations for this medically underserved population are also provided. The findings of this study could lead to significant improvements in clinical care and beneficial outcomes for breast cancer survivors. Trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02970344, registered 11/22/2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Shelby
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Caroline S Dorfman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Sarah S Arthur
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Hayden B Bosworth
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America; Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Leonor Corsino
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nutrition, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Linda Sutton
- Duke Cancer Network, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Lynda Owen
- Duke Cancer Network, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Alaattin Erkanli
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Francis Keefe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Cheyenne Corbett
- Supportive Care and Survivorship Center, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Gretchen Kimmick
- Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Family caregivers are centrally involved in cancer pain management, especially for patients with advanced disease. This issue is becoming ever more important as care shifts to the outpatient setting and home care and as the aging population creates more patients who have multiple illnesses and family caregivers who often live with serious illnesses. This narrative review evaluated current knowledge and literature regarding family caregivers' involvement in cancer pain management and identified areas for future research and clinical practice. There is a need for additional research in this area and for clinical models of support for family caregivers as they provide pain management for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betty R Ferrell
- From the Division of Nursing Research and Education, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Jadalla A, Ginex P, Coleman M, Vrabel M, Bevans M. Family Caregiver Strain and Burden: A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Interventions When Caring for Patients With Cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2020; 24:31-50. [DOI: 10.1188/20.cjon.31-50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
35
|
Porter LS, Baucom DH, Bonner M, Linardic C, Kazak AE. Parenting a child with cancer: a couple-based approach. Transl Behav Med 2020; 9:504-513. [PMID: 31094434 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibz016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Couples co-parenting a child with cancer face significant stressors that can adversely affect their couple relationship. How parents respond as a couple may affect the psychological adjustment of each parent and the child, as well as the ability of the family to cope with the child's illness. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a couple-based intervention for parents of children with cancer. We conducted a randomized pilot intervention study (N = 21 couples randomized with a 2:1 allocation to the couple-based intervention or education control) testing a six-session, telephone-based intervention that trained couples in relationship skills to help them care for their child, strengthen their relationship, and support each other. We examined feasibility and acceptability of the intervention to the parents. In this study, 56% of eligible couples agreed to participate; 82% of randomized couples completed post-intervention surveys, and 62% completed all six sessions. Satisfaction with the intervention was high (mean = 3.3 on a 4-point scale). Changes in both groups were small in magnitude and mixed in direction, with some outcomes favoring the couple-based intervention and other favoring the education condition. Supporting couples is important to optimize individual and parental functioning when a child has cancer. However, there are significant challenges to delivering couple-based interventions to these parents. More research is needed to establish optimal timing and content of couple-based interventions for these parents as well as feasible methods of delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura S Porter
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Donald H Baucom
- Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Melanie Bonner
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Corinne Linardic
- Department of Pediatrics-Hematology/Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Anne E Kazak
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health System, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Wilmington, DE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Li Y, Ling L, Zhanyu P. Effect of Wellness Education on Quality of Life of Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With First-Line Icotinib and on Their Family Caregivers. Integr Cancer Ther 2019; 18:1534735419842373. [PMID: 31043093 PMCID: PMC6498762 DOI: 10.1177/1534735419842373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To examine the effects of a wellness-education intervention on quality of life (QOL) of patients with NSCLC treated with icotinib and on their caregivers. Methods: This feasibility study was a prospective pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate a wellness-education intervention in NSCLC patients and caregivers undergoing icotinib treatment. The participants in the wellness-education group were provided with well-being information over 8 weeks. The Family Environment Scale (FES), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Lung (FACT-L), Caregiver QOL Index–Cancer Scale (CQOLC), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were measured at baseline prior to randomization and after 8 weeks. Patients completed the FACT-L and HADS, caregivers completed the CQOLC and FES. Results: 67 patients/caregivers in the wellness-education group and 71 in the control group could be analyzed. Feasibility targets were the following: (1) >70% study enrollment of eligible patients; (2) >90% of participants completing this study; (3) <10% missing data. Wellness-education group had better change scores at 8 weeks for the emotional well-being subscale of FACT-L (12.8 vs 15.6, P = .014), anxiety subscale of HADS (6.1 vs 6.7, P = .030), adaptation (66.0 vs 54.7, P = .037) and financial subscales of CQOLC (70.8 vs 69.8, P = .044), and the cohesion (7.3 ± 1.8 vs 5.7 ± 1.7, P= .021) and conflict (3.4 ± 1.9 vs 4.5 ± 1.7, P = .031) subscales of the FES. Conclusion: Wellness-education in patients/caregivers with NSCLC treated with icotinib are feasible and could improve patients’ QOL and their relationship with caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanwei Li
- 1 Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Li Ling
- 1 Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Pan Zhanyu
- 1 Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kedia SK, Collins A, Dillon PJ, Akkus C, Ward KD, Jackson BM. Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of lung cancer patients: A systematic review. Psychooncology 2019; 29:251-262. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.5271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 10/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Satish K. Kedia
- Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health University of Memphis Memphis Tennessee
| | - Andy Collins
- Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health University of Memphis Memphis Tennessee
| | - Patrick J. Dillon
- School of Communication Studies Kent State University at Stark North Canton Ohio
| | - Cem Akkus
- Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health University of Memphis Memphis Tennessee
| | - Kenneth D. Ward
- Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health University of Memphis Memphis Tennessee
| | - Bianca M. Jackson
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mosher CE, Secinti E, Hirsh AT, Hanna N, Einhorn LH, Jalal SI, Durm G, Champion VL, Johns SA. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Symptom Interference in Advanced Lung Cancer and Caregiver Distress: A Pilot Randomized Trial. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 58:632-644. [PMID: 31255586 PMCID: PMC6754796 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Revised: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Advanced lung cancer patients typically have a poor prognosis and many symptoms that interfere with functioning, contributing to high rates of emotional distress in both patients and family caregivers. There remains a need for evidence-based interventions to improve functional outcomes and distress in this population. OBJECTIVES This pilot trial examined the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of telephone-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for symptomatic, advanced lung cancer patients and their distressed family caregivers. Primary outcomes were patient symptom interference with functioning and patient and caregiver distress. METHODS Symptomatic, advanced lung cancer patients and distressed caregivers (n = 50 dyads) were randomly assigned to six sessions of ACT or an education/support condition. Patients completed measures of symptom interference and measures assessing the severity of fatigue, pain, sleep disturbance, and breathlessness. Patients and caregivers completed measures of distress and illness acceptance and struggle. RESULTS The eligibility screening rate (51%) and retention rate (76% at six weeks postintervention) demonstrated feasibility. No group differences were found with respect to patient and caregiver outcomes. Both groups showed a small, significant decrease in struggle with the illness over the study period, but did not show meaningful change in other outcomes. CONCLUSION Findings suggest that telephone-based ACT is feasible for many advanced lung cancer patients and caregivers, but may not substantially reduce symptom interference and distress. Low baseline levels of certain symptoms may have contributed to null findings. Next steps include applying ACT to specific, clinically meaningful symptom interference and varying intervention dose and modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine E Mosher
- Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
| | - Ekin Secinti
- Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Adam T Hirsh
- Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Nasser Hanna
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Lawrence H Einhorn
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Shadia I Jalal
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Richard L. Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Gregory Durm
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | - Shelley A Johns
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Milbury K, Li J, Weathers SP, Shih T, Malliaha S, Li Y, Cohen L. A research protocol for a pilot, randomized controlled trial designed to examine the feasibility of a dyadic versus individual yoga program for family caregivers of glioma patients undergoing radiotherapy. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2019; 5:95. [PMID: 31367462 PMCID: PMC6657047 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-019-0479-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the diagnosis and treatment of a primary brain tumor present unique challenges to patients and their family caregivers, evidence-based supportive care interventions are generally lacking. The primary aim of this research protocol is to determine the feasibility of implementing a dyadic yoga (DY) versus a caregiver yoga (CY) intervention or a wait-list control (WLC) group using a randomized controlled trial design. METHODS Seventy-five glioma patients undergoing radiotherapy and their family caregivers are randomized to the DY, CY, or a WLC group. Patient-caregiver dyads in the DY group and caregivers in the CY group receive 15 sessions (45 min each) over the course of patients' standard radiotherapy (6 weeks). Patients and caregivers in all groups complete baseline assessments of symptoms, quality of life (QOL), and health utilization outcomes prior to randomization. Follow-up assessments are performed 6 weeks and then again 3 months later. The primary outcome is feasibility (i.e., ≥ 50% of eligible dyads consent, ≥ 70% of enrolled dyads complete all assessments, and ≥ 50% of all practice sessions are attended). We will also perform primarily descriptive analyses of the self-reported outcomes (e.g., fatigue, overall QOL) and explore potential intervention moderators (e.g., performance status) to inform a larger future trial. CONCLUSION This trial will provide important information regarding the feasibility of a dyadic versus a caregiver yoga intervention regarding symptom, QOL, and health utilization outcomes in glioma patients and their caregivers. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02481349.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Milbury
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Shiao-Pei Weathers
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Tina Shih
- Department of Health Services, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Smitha Malliaha
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Yisheng Li
- Department of Biostatics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Lorenzo Cohen
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation & Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Nightingale CL, Steffen LE, Tooze JA, Petty W, Danhauer SC, Badr H, Weaver KE. Lung Cancer Patient and Caregiver Health Vulnerabilities and Interest in Health Promotion Interventions: An Exploratory Study. Glob Adv Health Med 2019; 8:2164956119865160. [PMID: 31360617 PMCID: PMC6637827 DOI: 10.1177/2164956119865160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Lung cancer patients and their caregivers are at risk for negative health behaviors and poor psychosocial functioning, but few interventions exist that target this population. To inform intervention development, we explored potential targets and interest and concordance in health promotion interventions among lung cancer patients and their caregivers. Methods Lung cancer patients (n = 18) with a smoking history and their caregivers (n = 15) participated in a cross-sectional, observational survey study (an average of 1 month postdiagnosis) to assess health behaviors, psychosocial functioning, and interest in health promotion interventions. Fisher’s exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests examined factors associated with intervention interest. McNemar’s test examined concordance in interest. Results Many caregivers (40%) reported providing care at least 4 days per week, and over half (53.3%) reported a smoking history. Patients reported high cancer self-blame (mean = 3.1, standard deviation = 0.9, range = 1–4). Patients (55.6%) and caregivers (60%) reported clinically significant depressive symptoms. There was high interest and concordance in interest in cancer education (patients, 77.8%; caregivers, 86.7%) and diet and exercise (patients, 66.7%; caregivers, 80%) interventions. Significantly more caregivers were interested in stress reduction (patients, 53.3%; caregivers, 73.3%; P = .05) and yoga (patients, 16.7%; caregivers, 50%; P = .03) than patients. Caregivers interested in stress reduction interventions had higher levels of distress than those not interested. Discussion Health promotion interventions are needed and of interest to lung cancer patients and caregivers. Shared interests in interventions suggest dyadic interventions may be appropriate, yet interventions should also address distinct patient and caregiver needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandylen L Nightingale
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Laurie E Steffen
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Janet A Tooze
- Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - William Petty
- Section on Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Suzanne C Danhauer
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Hoda Badr
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Kathryn E Weaver
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Xiu D, Fung YL, Lau BHP, Wong DFK, Chan CHY, Ho RTH, So TH, Lam TC, Lee VHF, Lee AWM, Chow SF, Lim FM, Tsang MW, Chan CLW, Chow AYM. Comparing dyadic cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) with dyadic integrative body-mind-spirit intervention (I-BMS) for Chinese family caregivers of lung cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:1523-1533. [PMID: 31280363 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04974-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The study adopted a randomized controlled trial to compare the effect of culturally compatible psychosocial interventions on multiple aspects of quality of life (QoL) for family caregivers of lung cancer patients. METHODS 157 Chinese informal caregivers of lung cancer patients were recruited together with the family members for whom they were providing care, and randomly assigned to either integrative body-mind-spirit intervention (I-BMS) or cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Patient-caregiver dyads attended the same arm of intervention in separate groups for 8 weeks. Assessments of generic QoL, anxiety, depression, perceived stress, insomnia, and caregiving burden were measured before intervention (T0), within 1-week (T1), 8-week (T2), and 16-week (T3) post-intervention. RESULTS Adopting the intention-to-treat analysis, family caregivers in receipt of both I-BMS and CBT exhibited a statistically significant improvement in generic QoL immediately following intervention and at follow-up assessments, with moderate effect size. Improvement of insomnia was found at T1 for both modes, which deteriorated at follow-up; both modes reduced anxiety and perceived stress at follow-up. No intervention effect was observed in depression and domains of caregiving burden. There was no significant interaction effect between intervention type and time. No main or interaction effect between sample background variables and intervention type was found to predict symptomatic changes at T1 and T3. CONCLUSIONS Culturally attuned I-BMS and CBT exhibited equivalent effectiveness in improving psychological distress and generic QoL for family caregivers of lung cancer patients. To improve the evaluation of outcomes, future study could benefit from incorporating a usual care control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daiming Xiu
- Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Yat-Lui Fung
- Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Bobo Hi-Po Lau
- Department of Counselling and Psychology, Hong Kong Shue Yan University, North Point, Hong Kong
| | - Daniel F K Wong
- Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Celia H Y Chan
- Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Rainbow T H Ho
- Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Tsz-Him So
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Tai-Chung Lam
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Victor Ho-Fun Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Anne W M Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | | | | | | | - Cecilia L W Chan
- Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Amy Y M Chow
- Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Treanor CJ, Santin O, Prue G, Coleman H, Cardwell CR, O'Halloran P, Donnelly M. Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 6:CD009912. [PMID: 31204791 PMCID: PMC6573123 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009912.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasingly, cancer is recognised as a chronic condition with a growing population of informal caregivers providing care for cancer patients. Informal caregiving can negatively affect the health and well-being of caregivers. We need a synthesised account of best evidence to aid decision-making about effective ways to support caregivers for individuals 'living with cancer'. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions designed to improve the quality of life (QoL), physical health and well-being of informal caregivers of people living with cancer compared with usual care. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, ProQuest, Open SIGLE, Web of Science from inception up to January 2018, trial registries and citation lists of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing psychosocial interventions delivered to adult informal caregivers of adults affected by cancer on a group or individual basis with usual care. Psychosocial interventions included non-pharmacological interventions that involved an interpersonal relationship between caregivers and healthcare professionals. We included interventions delivered also to caregiver-patient dyads. Interventions delivered to caregivers of individuals receiving palliative or inpatient care were excluded. Our primary outcome was caregiver QoL. Secondary outcomes included patient QoL, caregiver and patient depression, anxiety, psychological distress, physical health status and intervention satisfaction and adverse effects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Pairs of review authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and conducted 'Risk of bias' assessments. We synthesised findings using meta-analysis, where possible, and reported remaining results in a narrative synthesis. MAIN RESULTS Nineteen trials (n = 3, 725) were included in the review. All trials were reported in English and were undertaken in high-income countries. Trials targeted caregivers of patients affected by a number of cancers spanning newly diagnosed patients, patients awaiting treatment, patients who were being treated currently and individuals post-treatment. Most trials delivered interventions to caregiver-patient dyads (predominantly spousal dyads) and there was variation in intervention delivery to groups or individual participants. There was much heterogeneity across interventions though the majority were defined as psycho-educational. All trials were rated as being at 'high risk of bias'.Compared to usual care, psychosocial interventions may improve slightly caregiver QoL immediately post intervention (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.53; studies = 2, 265 participants) and may have little to no effect on caregiver QoL at 12 months (SMD 0.14, 95% CI - 0.11 to 0.40; studies = 2, 239 participants) post-intervention (both low-quality evidence).Psychosocial interventions probably have little to no effect on caregiver depression immediately to one-month post-intervention (SMD 0.01, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.15; studies = 9, 702 participants) (moderate-quality evidence). Psychosocial interventions may have little to no effect on caregiver anxiety immediately post-intervention (SMD -0.12, 95 % CI -0.33 to 0.10; studies = 5, 329 participants), depression three-to-six months (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.38; studies = 5. 379 participants) post-intervention and patient QoL six to 12 months (SMD -0.05, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.26; studies = 3, 294 participants) post-intervention (all low-quality evidence). There was uncertainty whether psychosocial interventions improve patient QoL immediately (SMD -0.03, 95 %CI -0.50 to 0.44; studies = 2, 292 participants) or caregiver anxiety three-to-six months (SMD-0.25, 95% CI -0.64 to 0.13; studies = 4, 272 participants) post-intervention (both very low-quality evidence). Two studies which could not be pooled in a meta-analysis for caregiver physical health status found little to no effect immediately post-intervention and a small intervention effect 12 months post-intervention. Caregiver or patient satisfaction or cost-effectiveness of interventions were not assessed in any studies. Interventions demonstrated good feasibility and acceptability.Psychosocial interventions probably have little to no effect on patient physical health status immediately post-intervention (SMD 0.17, 95 % CI -0.07 to 0.41; studies = 4, 461 participants) and patient depression three to six months post-intervention (SMD-0.11, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.12; studies = 6, 534 participants) (both moderate-quality evidence).Psychosocial interventions may have little to no effect on caregiver psychological distress immediately to one-month (SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.26; studies = 3, 134 participants), and seven to 12 months (SMD 0.08, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.58; studies = 2, 62 participants) post-intervention; patient depression immediately (SMD -0.12, 95% CI -0.31 to 0.07; studies = 9, 852 participants); anxiety immediately (SMD -0.13, 95% CI -0.41 to 0.15;studies = 4, 422 participants), and three to six months (SMD -0.22, 95% CI -0.45 to 0.02; studies = 4, 370 participants); psychological distress immediately (SMD -0.02, 95% CI -0.47 to 0.44; studies = 2, 74 participants) and seven to 12 months (SMD -0.27, 95% CI -0.78 to 0.24; studies = 2, 61 participants); and physical health status six to 12 months (SMD 0.06, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.30; studies = 2, 275 participants) post-intervention (all low-quality evidence).Three trials reported adverse effects associated with the interventions, compared with usual care, including higher distress, sexual function-related distress and lower relationship satisfaction levels for caregivers, higher distress levels for patients, and that some content was perceived as insensitive to some participants.Trials not able to be pooled in a meta-analysis did not tend to report effect size and it was difficult to discern intervention effectiveness. Variable intervention effects were reported for patient and caregiver outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Heterogeneity across studies makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions regarding the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for this population. There is an immediate need for rigorous trials with process evaluations and clearer, detailed intervention descriptions. Cost-effectiveness studies should be conducted alongside future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlene J Treanor
- Queen's University BelfastCentre for Public HealthInstitute of Clinical Sciences Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital SiteGrosvenor RoadBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT12 6BJ
| | - Olinda Santin
- Queen's University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery97 Lisburn RoadBelfastUKBT9 7BL
| | - Gillian Prue
- Queen's University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery97 Lisburn RoadBelfastUKBT9 7BL
| | - Helen Coleman
- Queen's University BelfastCentre for Public HealthInstitute of Clinical Sciences Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital SiteGrosvenor RoadBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT12 6BJ
| | - Chris R Cardwell
- Queen's University BelfastCentre for Public HealthInstitute of Clinical Sciences Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital SiteGrosvenor RoadBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT12 6BJ
| | - Peter O'Halloran
- Queen's University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery97 Lisburn RoadBelfastUKBT9 7BL
| | - Michael Donnelly
- Queen's University BelfastCentre for Public HealthInstitute of Clinical Sciences Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital SiteGrosvenor RoadBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT12 6BJ
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Porter LS, Samsa G, Steel JL, Hanson LC, LeBlanc TW, Bull J, Fischer S, Keefe FJ. Caregiver-guided pain coping skills training for patients with advanced cancer: Background, design, and challenges for the CaringPals study. Clin Trials 2019; 16:263-272. [PMID: 30782014 PMCID: PMC6533140 DOI: 10.1177/1740774519829695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Pain is a major concern of patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. There is strong evidence that pain coping skills training interventions based on cognitive-behavioral principles can reduce pain severity and pain interference. However, few such interventions have been tested for patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers. This study aims to test the efficacy of a caregiver-guided pain coping skills training protocol on patient and caregiver outcomes. METHODS A total of 214 patients age ≥18 with Stage III-Stage IV cancer and moderate to severe pain, along with their family caregivers, are being identified and randomized with a 1:1 allocation to the caregiver-guided pain coping skills training intervention or enhanced treatment-as-usual. Dyads in both conditions receive educational resources on pain management, and the caregiver-guided pain coping skills training intervention includes three weekly 60-min sessions conducted with the patient-caregiver dyad via videoconference. Measures of caregiver outcomes (self-efficacy for helping the patient manage pain, caregiver strain, caregiving satisfaction, psychological distress) and patient outcomes (self-efficacy for pain management, pain intensity and interference, psychological distress) are collected at baseline and post-intervention. Caregiver outcomes are also collected 3 and 6 months following the patient's death. The study is enrolling patients from four tertiary care academic medical centers and one free-standing hospice and palliative care organization. The primary outcome is caregiver self-efficacy for helping the patient manage pain. RESULTS This article describes challenges in the design and implementation of the CaringPals trial. Key issues for trial design include the identification and recruitment of patients with advanced cancer and pain, and the follow-up and collection of data from caregivers following the patient's death. CONCLUSION The CaringPals trial addresses a gap in research in pain coping skills training interventions by addressing the unique needs of patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. Findings from this study may lead to advances in the clinical care of patients with advanced cancer and pain, as well as a better understanding of the effects of training family caregivers to help patients cope with pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gregory Samsa
- 1 Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Laura C Hanson
- 3 Division of Geriatric Medicine & Palliative Care Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Janet Bull
- 4 Four Seasons Compassion for Life, Hendersonville, NC, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Corry M, Neenan K, Brabyn S, Sheaf G, Smith V. Telephone interventions, delivered by healthcare professionals, for providing education and psychosocial support for informal caregivers of adults with diagnosed illnesses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 5:CD012533. [PMID: 31087641 PMCID: PMC6516056 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012533.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maintaining care for ill persons in the community is heavily dependent on support from unpaid caregivers. Many caregivers, however, find themselves in a caring role for which they are ill prepared and may require professional support. The telephone is an easily accessible method of providing support irrespective of geographical location. OBJECTIVES The objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of telephone support interventions, delivered by healthcare professionals, when compared to usual care or non-telephone-based support interventions for providing education and psychosocial support for informal caregivers of people with acute and chronic diagnosed illnesses, and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of telephone interventions in this population. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases from inception to 16 November 2018: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; Embase; PsycINFO; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I; and CINAHL Complete. We also searched 11 caregiver-specific websites, three conference links, and two clinical trial registries. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (including cluster-RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. We excluded cross-over trials because of the high risk of carry-over effects from one intervention to another. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently screened citations against the review's inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the included studies using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. The review's prespecified primary (quality of life and burden) and secondary outcomes (skill acquisition, psychological health, knowledge, health status and well-being, family functioning, satisfaction, and economic outcomes), where reported, were assessed at the end of intervention delivery and at short-term (≤ 3 months), medium-term (> 3 to ≤ 6 months) and longer-term time points (> 6 to 12 months) following the intervention. Where possible, meta-analyses were conducted, otherwise results were reported narratively. MAIN RESULTS We included 21 randomised studies involving 1,690 caregivers; 19 studies compared telephone support interventions and usual care, of which 18 contributed data to the analyses. Two studies compared telephone and non-telephone professional support interventions. Caregiver ages ranged from 19 years to 87 years across studies. The majority of participants were female (> 70.53%), with two trials including females only. Most caregivers were family members, educated beyond secondary or high school level or had the equivalent in years of education. All caregivers were based in the community. Overall risk of bias was high for most studies.The results demonstrated that there is probably little or no difference between telephone support interventions and usual care for the primary outcome of quality of life at the end of intervention (SMD -0.02, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.19, 4 studies, 364 caregivers) (moderate-certainty evidence) or burden at the end of intervention (SMD -0.11, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.07, 9 studies, 788 caregivers) (low-certainty evidence). For one study where quality of life at the end of intervention was reported narratively, the findings indicated that a telephone support intervention may result in slightly higher quality of life, compared with usual care. Two further studies on caregiver burden were reported narratively; one reported that telephone support interventions may decrease burden, the other reported no change in the intervention group, compared with usual care.We are uncertain about the effects of telephone support interventions on caregiver depression at the end of intervention (SMD -0.37, 95% CI -0.70 to -0.05, 9 studies, 792 caregivers) due to very low-certainty evidence for this outcome. Depression was reported narratively for three studies. One reported that the intervention may reduce caregiver depression at the end of intervention, but this effect was not sustained at short-term follow-up. The other two studies reported there may be little or no difference between telephone support and usual care for depression at the end of intervention. Six studies measured satisfaction with the intervention but did not report comparative data. All six reported high satisfaction scores with the intervention. No adverse events, including suicide or suicide ideation, were measured or reported by any of the included studies.Our analysis indicated that caregiver anxiety may be slightly reduced (MD -6.0, 95% CI -11.68 to -0.32, 1 study, 61 caregivers) and preparedness to care slightly improved (SMD 0.37, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.64, 2 studies, 208 caregivers) at the end of intervention, following telephone-only support interventions compared to usual care. Findings indicated there may be little or no difference between telephone support interventions and usual care for all of the following outcomes at the end of intervention: problem-solving, social activity, caregiver competence, coping, stress, knowledge, physical health, self-efficacy, family functioning, and satisfaction with supports (practical or social). There may also be little or no effect of telephone support interventions for quality of life and burden at short-term follow-up or for burden and depression at medium-term follow-up.Litttle or no difference was found between groups for any of the reported outcomes in studies comparing telephone and non-telephone professional support interventions. We are uncertain as to the effects of telephone support interventions compared to non-telephone support interventions for caregiver burden and depression at the end of intervention. No study reported on quality of life or satisfaction with the intervention and no adverse events were reported or noted in the two studies reporting on this comparison. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Although our review indicated slight benefit may exist for telephone support interventions on some outcomes (e.g. anxiety and preparedness to care at the end of intervention), for most outcomes, including the primary outcomes, telephone-only interventions may have little or no effect on caregiver outcomes compared to usual care. The findings of the review were mainly based on studies with overall high risk of bias, and few participants. Further high-quality trials, with larger sample sizes are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margarita Corry
- Trinity College DublinSchool of Nursing and MidwiferyDublinIreland
| | - Kathleen Neenan
- Trinity College DublinSchool of Nursing and MidwiferyDublinIreland
| | - Sally Brabyn
- University of YorkDepartment of Health SciencesHeslingtonYorkUKYO10 5DD
| | - Greg Sheaf
- The Library of Trinity College DublinCollege StreetDublinIreland
| | - Valerie Smith
- Trinity College DublinSchool of Nursing and MidwiferyDublinIreland
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Strategies of Coping with Pain: Differences Associated with the Histological Type of Lung Cancer. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2019; 1222:43-53. [DOI: 10.1007/5584_2019_429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
46
|
Shelby RA, Dorfman CS, Bosworth HB, Keefe F, Sutton L, Owen L, Corsino L, Erkanli A, Reed SD, Arthur SS, Somers T, Barrett N, Huettel S, Gonzalez JM, Kimmick G. Testing a behavioral intervention to improve adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET). Contemp Clin Trials 2019; 76:120-131. [PMID: 30472215 PMCID: PMC6346744 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Revised: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is used to prevent recurrence and reduce mortality for women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Poor adherence to AET is a significant problem and contributes to increased medical costs and mortality. A variety of problematic symptoms associated with AET are related to non-adherence and early discontinuation of treatment. The goal of this study is to test a novel, telephone-based coping skills training that teaches patients adherence skills and techniques for coping with problematic symptoms (CST-AET). Adherence to AET will be assessed in real-time for 18 months using wireless smart pill bottles. Symptom interference (i.e., pain, vasomotor symptoms, sleep problems, vaginal dryness) and cost-effectiveness of the intervention protocol will be examined as secondary outcomes. Participants (N = 400) will be recruited from a tertiary care medical center or community clinics in medically underserved or rural areas. Participants will be randomized to receive CST-AET or a general health education intervention (comparison condition). CST-AET includes ten nurse-delivered calls delivered over 6 months. CST-AET provides systematic training in coping skills for managing symptoms that interfere with adherence. Interactive voice messaging provides reinforcement for skills use and adherence that is tailored based on real-time adherence data from the wireless smart pill bottles. Given the high rates of non-adherence and recent recommendations that women remain on AET for 10 years, we describe a timely trial. If effective, the CST-AET protocol may not only reduce the burden of AET use but also lead to cost-effective changes in clinical care and improve breast cancer outcomes. Trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02707471, registered 3/3/2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Shelby
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Caroline S Dorfman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Hayden B Bosworth
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States; Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Francis Keefe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Linda Sutton
- Duke Cancer Network, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Lynda Owen
- Duke Cancer Network, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Leonor Corsino
- Division of Endocrinology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Alaattin Erkanli
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Shelby D Reed
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States; Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Sarah S Arthur
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Tamara Somers
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Nadine Barrett
- Office of Health Equity and Disparities, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Scott Huettel
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Juan Marcos Gonzalez
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Gretchen Kimmick
- Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Valenta S, Spirig R, Miaskowski C, Zaugg K, Spichiger E. Testing a pain self-management intervention by exploring reduction of analgesics' side effects in cancer outpatients and the involvement of family caregivers: a study protocol (PEINCA-FAM). BMC Nurs 2018; 17:54. [PMID: 30559603 PMCID: PMC6292053 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-018-0323-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pain is one of cancer patients’ most frequent and distressing symptoms; however, analgesics’ side effects often increase symptom burden. Further, with the home rapidly becoming the primary cancer care setting, family caregivers (FCs) commonly play central roles in patients’ pain self-management, but with little or no preparation. One US-tested intervention, the PRO-SELF© Plus Pain Control Program (PCP), designed to support cancer outpatients and their FCs in pain self-management, is currently being tested in the Swiss multi-centre PEINCA study. The current PEINCA-FAM study is a sub-study of PEINCA. The aims of PEINCA-FAM are: a) to test the efficacy of the adapted German PRO-SELF © Plus PCP to reduce side effects of analgesics; b) to enhance patients’/FCs’ knowledge regarding cancer pain; and c) to explore FCs’ involvement in patients’ pain self-management. Methods This mixed methods project combines a multi-centre randomized controlled clinical trial with qualitative data collection techniques and includes 210 patients recruited from three oncology outpatient clinics. FCs involved in patients’ pain self-management are also invited to participate. After baseline evaluation, eligible participants are randomized to a 6-week intervention group and a control group. Both groups complete a daily pain and symptom diary. Intervention group patients/FCs receive the weekly psychoeducational PRO-SELF© Plus PCP interventions; control group patients receive usual care. After completing the six-week study procedures, a subsample of 7–10 patients/FCs per group and hospital (N = 42–60) will be interviewed regarding their pain management experiences. Data collection will take place from April 2016 until December 2018. An intent-to-treat analysis and generalized linear mixed models will be applied. Qualitative data will be analysed by using interpretive description. Quantitative and qualitative results will be combined within a mixed method matrix. Discussion In clinical practice, specially trained oncology nurses in outpatient clinics could apply the intervention to reduce side effects and to enhance patients’/FCs’ self-efficacy and pain management knowledge. Trial registration The PEINCA study is registered in the Clinical Trials.gov site (code: NCT02713919, 08 March 2016).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Valenta
- 1Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.,2Department of Hematology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Rebecca Spirig
- 1Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.,3Department of Nursing Science, University of Witten/ Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| | - Christine Miaskowski
- 4School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, USA
| | - Kathrin Zaugg
- 5Department of Radiation Oncology, Stadtspital Triemli, Zurich, Switzerland.,6Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Elisabeth Spichiger
- 1Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.,7Head Office of Nursing and Allied Health Professionals, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Porter LS, Gao X, Lyna P, Kraus W, Olsen M, Patterson E, Puleo B, Pollak KI. Pilot randomized trial of a couple-based physical activity videoconference intervention for sedentary cancer survivors. Psychol Health 2018; 37:861-865. [PMID: 30138021 PMCID: PMC9840846 DOI: 10.1037/hea0000608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Including partners in interventions to increase physical activity (PA) could promote better adherence and longer-term effects. In preparation for a future large-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT), this randomized pilot trial tested the acceptability of a novel couple-based PA intervention for breast and prostate cancer survivors and the feasibility of conducting an RCT testing the intervention. METHOD Twenty cancer survivors (70% female; mean age = 63.0 years, SD = 8.9) and their partners (35% female; mean age = 62.8 years, SD = 7.7) were randomized to either the intervention or waitlist control. Couples in the intervention received four videoconference sessions including training in communication and support skills and behavior change techniques. Measures of PA and partner support for exercise were collected from survivors and partners before randomization and postintervention. Survivors also completed a physical well-being measure, and intervention participants completed a treatment acceptability measure. RESULTS Recruitment was challenging; approximately 18% of eligible survivors and their partners agreed to participate. Ninety-two percent of randomized participants completed postintervention surveys, and 78% of dyads randomized to the intervention arm completed all 4 sessions. Mean acceptability ratings were moderate to high. Mean difference scores suggested that participants in the intervention arm tended to report greater improvements in PA, partner support, and physical well-being than those in the control arm. CONCLUSIONS These preliminary findings suggest that the couple-based PA intervention was acceptable to survivors and their partners and that a large-scale RCT is likely to be feasible with modified recruitment strategies. Recommendations for improving recruitment and conducting a larger study are presented. (PsycINFO Database Record
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura S Porter
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute
| | - Xiaomei Gao
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute
| | - Pauline Lyna
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute
| | | | - Maren Olsen
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
| | | | - Blair Puleo
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Marzorati C, Renzi C, Russell-Edu SW, Pravettoni G. Telemedicine Use Among Caregivers of Cancer Patients: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20:e223. [PMID: 29914858 PMCID: PMC6028768 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Revised: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of published studies and systematic reviews examining different telehealth interventions targeting patients and their effects on patients' well-being and quality of life have grown in recent decades. However, the use of telemedicine tools aimed at the family members and caregivers of adult cancer patients is less defined. OBJECTIVE We aimed to conduct a systematic review to provide a more complete picture regarding telemedicine tools for informal caregivers (usually family members or close friends) implemented in all phases of cancer care. More specifically, the review aimed to better describe the study samples' characteristics, to analyze measured outcomes and the specific questionnaires used to assess them, and to describe in depth the implemented interventions and their formats. Finally, we examined the role of telehealth, and usability and feasibility trends in supporting patients' caregivers. METHODS We systematically searched the literature in the following databases: Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO. Inclusion criteria were being written in English, published in peer-reviewed journals, describing a telehealth-implemented intervention, and focusing on caregivers of adult cancer patients at any stage of the disease. We selected studies published up to November 2017. We critically appraised included articles using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and graded the quality of evidence by outcome using the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine framework. RESULTS We included 24 studies in the final selection. In 21 of the 24 studies, the patient-caregiver dyad was analyzed, and the study population dealt with different types of cancer at different stages. Included studies considered the caregiver's condition from both an individual and a relational point of view. Along with psychosocial variables, some studies monitored engagement and user satisfaction regarding Web-based platforms or telehealth interventions. All studies reported significant improvements in some of the investigated areas, but they often showed small effect sizes. Two types of telehealth intervention formats were used: Web-based platforms and telephone calls. Some of the included studies referred to the same project, but on study samples with different cancer diagnoses or with new versions of previously developed interventions. CONCLUSIONS Reported outcomes seem to suggest that we are in an exploratory phase. More detailed and targeted research hypotheses are still needed. Clarifying caregivers' needs related to telehealth tools and better defining outcome measures may yield more significant results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Marzorati
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Renzi
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Porter LS, Keefe FJ. Couple-based communication interventions for cancer: moving beyond a 'one size fits all' approach. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:693-695. [PMID: 29219014 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1400687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|