1
|
Haupt EC, Sharma I, Nguyen HQ. Symptom Burden and Survival in Patients Receiving Outpatient and Home-Based Palliative Care. J Palliat Med 2023; 26:843-848. [PMID: 36917220 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Symptom burden assessment with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) has been widely studied among patients in outpatient palliative care (OPC), but fewer reports in home-based palliative care (HBPC), and none has assessed the prognostic value of ESAS scores in HBPC. Methods: This retrospective cohort study compares symptom burden and its prognostic value in adult patients receiving OPC and HBPC services between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2021. Results: Patients completed the ESAS at the first OPC consultation (n = 4086) and at admission to HBPC (n = 4087). OPC patients were younger, more likely to have cancer, less likely to have had a recent hospitalization, and had higher adjusted median ESAS scores (28.1 vs. 22.9) compared with HBPC patients (all p < 0.001). ESAS was prognostic of survival in both settings (Hazard ratio 1.18-1.64, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Symptom burden is an independent prognosticator of survival in HBPC and OPC in this community-based setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric C Haupt
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - Ishita Sharma
- Department of Geriatric, Palliative Medicine and Continuing Care, Kaiser-Downey Medical Center, Downey, California, USA
| | - Huong Q Nguyen
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ullrich A, Schulz H, Goldbach S, Hollburg W, Rommel A, Müller M, Kirsch D, Kopplin-Förtsch K, Messerer J, König L, Schulz-Kindermann F, Bokemeyer C, Oechsle K. Need for additional professional psychosocial and spiritual support in patients with advanced diseases in the course of specialist palliative care - a longitudinal observational study. BMC Palliat Care 2021; 20:182. [PMID: 34823535 PMCID: PMC8613968 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00880-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated the need for additional professional support and associated factors in patients (pts) at initiation and in the course of in- and outpatient specialist palliative care (I-SPC/O-SPC). METHODS Pts entering an urban SPC network consecutively completed questionnaires on psychosocial/spiritual problems and support needs within 72 h (T0) as well as within the first 6 weeks (T1) of SPC. Hierarchical linear regression analysis was used to investigate the impact of sociodemographic / disease-related variables, psychological / physical burden, social support, and SPC setting on the extent of support needs. RESULTS Four hundred twenty-five pts (70 years, 48% female, 91% cancer, 67% O-SPC) answered at T0, and 167 at T1. At T0, main problems related to transportation, usual activities, and dependency (83-89%). At T1, most prevalent problems also related to transportation and usual activities and additionally to light housework (82-86%). At T0, support needs were highest for transportation, light housework, and usual activities (35-41%). Cross-sectional comparisons of SPC settings revealed higher problem scores in O-SPC compared to I-SPC at T0 (p = .039), but not at T1. Support need scores were higher in O-SPC at T0 (p < .001), but lower at T1 (p = .039). Longitudinal analyses showed a decrease of support need scores over time, independent from the SPC setting. At T0, higher distress (p = .047), anxiety/depression (p < .001), physical symptom burden (p < .001) and I-SPC (p < .001) were associated with higher support need scores (at T1: only higher distress, p = .037). CONCLUSION Need for additional professional psychosocial/spiritual support was identified in up to 40% of pts. with higher need at the beginning of O-SPC than of I-SPC. During SPC, this need decreased in both settings, but got lower in O-SPC than in I-SPC over time. Support need scores were not only associated with psychological, but also physical burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneke Ullrich
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Holger Schulz
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sven Goldbach
- Specialist Outpatient Palliative Care Team "PalliativPartner Hamburg GbR", Hamburg, Germany
| | - Wiebke Hollburg
- Specialist Outpatient Palliative Care Team "PalliativPartner Hamburg GbR", Hamburg, Germany
| | - Annette Rommel
- Specialist Outpatient Palliative Care Team "Das Palliativteam", Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marten Müller
- Palliative Care Ward, Asklepios Hospital Rissen, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Denise Kirsch
- Specialist Outpatient Palliative Care Team "PCT Hamburg-West", Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Julia Messerer
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Louise König
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karin Oechsle
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|