Complications of bladder closure in cloacal exstrophy: Do osteotomy and reoperative closure factor in?

Updates on the Care of Cloacal Exstrophy

Cloacal exstrophy is the most severe congenital anomaly of the exstrophy-epispadias complex and is characterized by gastrointestinal, genitourinary, neurospinal, and musculoskeletal malformations. Individualized surgical reconstruction by a multidisciplinary team is required for these complex patients. Not infrequently, patients need staged surgical procedures throughout childhood and adolescence. Following significant improvements in medical care and surgical reconstructive techniques, nearly all patients with cloacal exstrophy now survive, leading to an increased emphasis on quality of life. Increased attention is given to gender identity and the implications of reconstructive decisions. Long-term sequelae of cloacal exstrophy, including functional continence and sexual dysfunction, are recognized, and many patients require ongoing complex care into adulthood.

Fixation with lower limb immobilization in primary and secondary exstrophy closure: A saving grace

PURPOSE

A pivotal factor in the success of bladder closure in patients with classic bladder exstrophy (CBE) is the postoperative immobilization of the pelvis and lower extremities after pelvic osteotomy. This study investigates the outcomes of closure among patients with lower limb immobilization using many techniques. The authors hypothesize that the addition of external fixation (pelvic immobilization) in patients with any form of limb immobilization will be associated with improved outcomes.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained institutional exstrophy-epispadias complex database of 1415 patients was reviewed for patients with CBE who had undergone closure with available immobilization and osteotomy data. Association between closure outcomes and immobilization techniques were determined. Univariate analysis was performed using Chi-Square or Fischer-Exact test as appropriate for categorical variables. Multivariate analysis via binomial logistic regression was used to identify factors leading to successful closure.

RESULTS

A total of 747 closure events matching the inclusion criteria were identified. Patients included 508 males and 239 females. There were 597 primary closures (79.9%) with 150 reclosure events (20.1%). Limb immobilization was used in 627 (83.9%) of closure events. Successful closures were associated with osteotomy use (p < 0.0001) and limb immobilization (p < 0.0001); specifically, the combined anterior innominate with posterior vertical iliac osteotomy and modified Buck's traction with external fixation (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001). Among the group of 33 patients who received external fixation alone and no other type of immobilization, the failure rate was 33.3%, comparatively, patients with any form of combined immobilization (external fixation with lower limb immobilization) had a failure rate of 7.1% ( Table 1). Among patients immobilized with mummy wrap, spica casting, or knee immobilizers, external fixation was associated with 3.76 increased odds of successful closure (p = 0.0005, 95% CI 1.79-7.90). In a unique group of 67 patients without pelvic osteotomy or any form of pelvic or limb immobilization, the failure rate was 74.6%.

DISCUSSION

This study confirms, in a larger series, previous findings of improved outcomes when patients are immobilized with modified Buck's traction and external fixation. The authors apply this technique in most all closures and recommend this technique be utilized whenever feasible. However, regardless of the manner of lower limb immobilization, external fixation is a critical factor to optimize closures and ensure success.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study clearly suggest the use of external fixation can be protective against bladder closure failure. The use of pelvic immobilization, in addition to post-operative lower limb immobilization should be strongly considered.

Orthopedic complications after osteotomy in patients with classic bladder exstrophy and cloacal exstrophy: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

The addition of pelvic osteotomy to the armamentarium of tools for correction of classic bladder exstrophy (CBE) and cloacal exstrophy (CE) has undeniably served as one of the most effective advancements in improving the likelihood of successful primary bladder closure. Osteotomy-related complications have been studied and documented extensively in patients with CBE, yet evaluation remains limited in CE concordant with its relative rarity.

OBJECTIVE

To compare orthopedic complications in patients with CBE and CE who underwent primary bladder closure with osteotomy.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained, IRB-approved database of 1401 exstrophy-epispadias patients was reviewed for patients with CBE or CE after primary closure and pelvic osteotomy performed at a single institution from 1975 to 2021. Failed closure was defined as dehiscence, bladder prolapse, or vesicocutaneous fistula at any point. Surgery or anesthesia-related complications were captured within 6 weeks of osteotomy or closure.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients were included in the analysis with 109 and 37 patients with CBE and CE, respectively. Between the CBE and CE cohorts, there were significant differences in median age at primary closure (68 days [IQR 10-260] vs 597 [448-734]; p < 0.001), diastasis width (4 cm IQR [3.8-4.6] vs 6.1 [5.0-7.2]; p < 0.001), osteotomy at time of closure (99.1% vs 75.7%; p < 0.001), and utilization of external hip fixation (67.9% vs 89.2%; p = 0.011). There was no significant difference by gender, osteotomy technique, or hip immobilization technique. Regarding exstrophy closure outcomes, there were 5 failures in the CBE group and 1 in the CE group (p = 1.000). Complications were experienced in 38.5% and 56.8% of CBE and CE patients (p = 0.054) with a significant difference in orthopedic complications (primarily consisting of superficial pin-site infections) between the cohorts (4.6% vs 16.2%, p = 0.031). There was no significant difference in grade 3 or higher complications between cohorts (5.5% vs 13.5%, p = 0.147).

DISCUSSION

This was the first study comparing orthopedic complications after osteotomy between CBE and CE, providing valuable insight into which factors vary among cohorts and which are associated with increased complication rates. Despite availability of high case numbers for these rare disorders, the analysis continued to be limited sample size and missing data for retrospective analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

While exstrophy closure success and overall complications rates are similar in patients with CBE and CE, patients with CE experience more superficial pin-site infections after pelvic osteotomy. External hip fixation may be associated with the increase in orthopedic complications, though further research is required to elucidate the underlying cause of these complications.

An evaluation of perioperative surgical procedures and complications in classic bladder exstrophy patients Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric (NSQIP-P)

INTRODUCTION

Classic bladder exstrophy (CBE) repair report wide variation in success. Given the complexity of CBE care, benefit would be derived from validation of reported outcomes. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric (NSQIP-P) data, this manuscript evaluates surgical complications for bladder closure and advanced urologic reconstruction in CBE patients.

AIM

The primary aim of this study was to determine complication rates in the CBE population for bladder closure and advanced urologic reconstruction in national studies compared to single-institutional studies.

STUDY DESIGN

Pediatric cases and complications were identified in the 2012-2019 NSQIP-P database in CBE patients who had either bladder closure or advanced urologic reconstruction. Bladder closure was further defined as early (<7 days) or delayed (>7 days). Differences were assessed using Fisher's exact test and analysis was conducted using SPSS with significance defined as p-value <0.05.

RESULTS

302 patients were included; 152 patients underwent bladder closure, and 150 patients underwent advanced urologic reconstruction. The 30-day complication rate for bladder closure is 30.3% and for advanced urologic reconstruction is 24.0% in the CBC cohort. No differences were found in the rates of NSQIP complications between early and delayed bladder closure, though significant differences (p < 0.001) were found in the rates of blood transfusion (17.9 vs 65.3%). This may be due to the different rates of osteotomy (25.0 vs 48.3%) between early and delayed bladder closure. Rates of readmission are 14.7% and rates of reoperation are 8.0% for advanced urologic reconstruction procedures. Both bladder closure and advanced urologic reconstruction had infectious issues in greater than 10% of the population.

DISCUSSION

CBE surgeries nationally carry a higher risk of complications than is reported in most institutional studies. Infectious complications occur greater than 10% of the time in both bladder closure and advanced urologic reconstruction, which should be the source of additional study given the inverse relationship infections pose to surgical success in BE patients. A limitation of this study is that the data is derived from Children's hospitals that elect to participate and includes only data from 30 days after a procedure.

CONCLUSION

CBE complication data for both bladder closure and advanced urologic reconstruction may be underrepresented in the literature.

The failed bladder closure in cloacal exstrophy: Management and outcomes

PURPOSE

Cloacal exstrophy (CE) is the most severe presentation of the Exstrophy-Epispadias Complex (EEC) and is associated with an omphalocele, making the bladder and abdominal wall closure difficult. If the bladder closure fails, a secondary closure is necessary. The objective of this study is to identify patient or surgical factors associated with a successful secondary closure.

METHODS

The institution's EEC database was reviewed for CE patients between 1975 and 2015. Inclusion criteria included a failed primary bladder closure with a secondary closure. Patient demographics, surgical factors and outcomes of the secondary bladder closure were reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients met inclusion criteria. 8/8 patients had a successful two-staged closure at the author's institution (100%); 2/16 patients had a successful closure at an outside institution (12.5%). Older median age at secondary closure was associated with outcome, p = 0.045. Pelvic osteotomy was associated with successful secondary closure, p = 0.013. Using Buck's immobilization with external fixation was associated with a higher proportion of successful secondary closures compared to Spica cast, p = 0.012.

CONCLUSION

Successful reclosure in CE patients is associated with the use of osteotomy as well as Buck's immobilization with external fixation. While successful reclosure can be achieved, it is often at the cost of multiple procedures and, therefore, all efforts should be expended to achieve a successful primary closure.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prognostic.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Predictors of a successful primary bladder closure in cloacal exstrophy: A multivariable analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the factors affecting primary bladder closure in cloacal exstrophy (CE). A successful primary closure is important for optimizing reconstructive outcomes, and it is a critical first-step in the reconstruction of CE. The authors' hypothesize that a smaller diastasis and use of an osteotomy are independent predictors of a successful closure.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database of 1332 exstrophy-epispadias complex (EEC) patients was reviewed for CE patients closed between 1975 and 2015. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify significant factors associated with CE primary bladder closure.

RESULTS

Of 143 CE patients identified, 99 patients met inclusion criteria. Median follow-up time was 8.82 [IQR 5.43-14.26] years. In the multivariable model, the odds of having a successful closure are about 4 times greater for the staged cloacal approach compared to the 1-stage approach (OR, 3.7; 95% CI 1.2-11.5; p-value = 0.023). Also, having an osteotomy increases the chance of a successful closure by almost six-fold (OR, 5.8; 95% CI 1.7-19.6; p-value = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Using the staged approach with a pelvic osteotomy is paramount to a successful primary closure in CE. The authors strongly recommend using the staged approach and osteotomy as these factors independently increase the chance for a successful primary bladder closure.

STUDY TYPE

Therapeutic study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Retrospective comparative study.