An assessment of proximal humerus density with reference to stemless implants

Clinical and radiological results of the SIMPLICITI* stemless shoulder arthroplasty: a twenty five patients retrospective cohort

PURPOSE

For preserving the humeral bone stock, some surgeons proposed a stemless humeral prosthetic component. This study reports the functional and radiologic results of the stemless anatomic prosthesis Simpliciti*(Tornier, Wright, Stryker), with the hypothesis that it can achieve a good metaphyseal fixation.

METHODS

28 patients underwent 30 shoulder replacements with the Simpliciti* humeral prosthesis followed for an average of three years (2 months to 8 years). The clinical outcome used the Constant-Murley score and the Bankes resistance and force evaluation. The radiologic assessment looked after radiolucent lines, signs of implant migration, osteolysis or loosening.

RESULTS

The Constant score improved from 19.03 preoperatively to 54.03 points post operatively. Radiographic analysis showed one early component loosening, and at the longer follow-up, one radiolucent line. All the other implants appeared well fixed.

CONCLUSION

This study verified the quality of the metaphyseal fixation of this stemless implant, with achieving a significant functional improvement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Case Series, Treatment Study.

Preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography bone density measures provide objective bone quality classifications for stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Reproducible methods for determining adequate bone densities for stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) are currently lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging for assessing the bone density of the proximal humerus for supportive differentiation in the decision making for stemless humeral component implantation. It was hypothesized that preoperative 3-dimensional (3-D) CT bone density measures provide objective classifications of the bone quality for stemless aTSA.

METHODS

A 3-part study was performed that included the analysis of cadaveric humerus CT scans followed by retrospective application to a clinical cohort and classification with a machine learning model. Thirty cadaveric humeri were evaluated with clinical CT and micro-CT (μCT) imaging. Phantom-calibrated CT data were used to extract 3-D regions of interest and defined radiographic scores. The final image processing script was applied retrospectively to a clinical cohort (n = 150) that had a preoperative CT and intraoperative bone density assessment using the "thumb test," followed by placement of an anatomic stemmed or stemless humeral component. Postscan patient-specific calibration was used to improve the functionality and accuracy of the density analysis. A machine learning model (Support vector machine [SVM]) was utilized to improve the classification of bone densities for a stemless humeral component.

RESULTS

The image processing of clinical CT images demonstrated good to excellent accuracy for cylindrical cancellous bone densities (metaphysis [ICC = 0.986] and epiphysis [ICC = 0.883]). Patient-specific internal calibration significantly reduced biases and unwanted variance compared with standard HU CT scans (P < .0001). The SVM showed optimized prediction accuracy compared with conventional statistics with an accuracy of 73.9% and an AUC of 0.83 based on the intraoperative decision of the surgeon. The SVM model based on density clusters increased the accuracy of the bone quality classification to 87.3% with an AUC of 0.93.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative CT imaging allows accurate evaluation of the bone densities in the proximal humerus. Three-dimensional regions of interest, rescaling using patient-specific calibration, and a machine learning model resulted in good to excellent prediction for objective bone quality classification. This approach may provide an objective tool extending preoperative selection criteria for stemless humeral component implantation.

Implications of humeral short-stem diametral sizing on implant stability

Background

Shoulder arthroplasty humeral stem design has evolved to include various shapes, coatings, lengths, sizes, and fixation methods. While necessary to accommodate patient anatomy characteristics, this creates a surgical paradox of choice. The relationship between the surgeon's selection of short-stem implant size and construct stiffness, resistance to subsidence and micromotion has not been assessed.

Methods

Eight paired cadaveric humeri were reconstructed with surgeon-selected (SS) and 2-mm diametrically larger (SS+2) short-stemmed press-fit implants. Each reconstruction was subjected to 2000 cycles of 90° forward flexion loading, and stem subsidence and micromotion were measured using optical tracking. Compressive stiffness of the stem-bone reconstruction was then assessed by applying a load in-line with the stem axis that resulted in 5 mm of stem subsidence.

Results

Increasing stem size by 2 mm resulted in the construct stiffness more than doubling compared to SS stems (-741 ± 243 N/mm vs. -334 ± 120 N/mm; P = .003; power = 0.971). These larger stems also subsided significantly less than their SS counterparts (SS: 1.2 ± 0.6 mm; SS+2: 0.5 ± 0.5 mm; P = .029; power = 0.66), though there were no significant changes in micromotion (SS: 169 ± 59 μm; SS+2: 187 ± 52 μm; P = .506; power = 0.094).

Conclusions

The results of this study highlight the importance of proper short-stem sizing, as a relatively small 2 mm increase in diametral size was observed to significantly impact construct stiffness, which could increase the risk of stress shielding and implant loosening. Future work should focus on developing tools that objectively quantify bone quality and aid surgeons in selecting the appropriate size short-stem humeral implants for a particular patient.

Stemless shoulder arthroplasty

The concept of stemless shoulder arthroplasty was born in 2005. It is now a valid option in the context of either anatomical or reverse shoulder replacement. Several questions have come up over our 15 years of using this system: How was the stemless shoulder arthroplasty concept born? It was motivated by a desire to have epiphyso-metaphyseal fixation using a corolla-shaped impacted anchor design. What are the features of commercially available stemless shoulder arthroplasty implants? The stemless anatomical implants now available have either a cage or central peg that is impacted or a system that is screwed into the epiphysometaphyseal bone. Several companies have introduced stemless reverse implants, some of which have an onlay configuration. How do the results of stemless implants compare to those of traditional stemmed implants? At a mean follow-up of 10 years, the outcomes of stemless TSA can be superimposed with those of traditional stemmed TSA. What are the advantages of stemless shoulder implants? The advantages are their simple implantation, ability to adapt to patient morphology and any malunions, various orientation angles, no stress-shielding, reduced risk of infection and bleeding and less complex revision surgery (if needed). What are the limitations or drawbacks of using stemless implants? The two main limitations are insufficient metaphyseal bone stock and poor bone quality, especially for reverse configurations. What does the future hold for stemless shoulder arthroplasty? Like with traditional stemmed implants, the longevity of stemless shoulder arthroplasty depends on its tribology, which can still be improved. In the future, a stemless implant will need to be convertible like stemmed humeral implants, and if possible, provide an inlay reverse configuration.

Simple preoperative radiographic and computed tomography measurements predict adequate bone quality for stemless total shoulder arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Although there is increased utilization of stemless humeral implants in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), there are inadequate objective metrics to evaluate bone quality sufficient for fixation. Our goals are to: (1) compare patient characteristics in patients who had plans for stemless TSA but received stemmed TSA due to intraoperative assessments and (2) propose threshold values of bone density, using the deltoid tuberosity index (DTI) and proximal humerus Hounsfield units (HU), on preoperative X-ray and computed tomography (CT) to allow for preoperative determination of adequate bone stock for stemless TSA.

METHODS

This is an observational study conducted at an academic institution from 2019 to 2021, including consecutive primary TSAs templated to undergo stemless TSA based on 3-dimensional CT preoperative plans. Final implant selection was determined by intraoperative assessment of bone quality. Preoperative X-ray and CT images were assessed to obtain DTI and proximal humeral bone density in HU, respectively. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to analyze the potential of preoperative X-ray and CT to classify patients as candidates for stemless TSA.

RESULTS

A total of 61 planned stemless TSAs were included, with 56 (91.8%) undergoing stemless TSA and 5 (8.2%) undergoing stemmed TSA after intraoperative assessment determined that the bone quality was inadequate for stemless fixation. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of gender (P = .640), body mass index (P = .296), and race (P = .580). The stem cohort was significantly older (mean age 69 ± 12 years vs. 59 ± 10 years, P = .029), had significantly lower DTI (1.45 ± 0.13 vs. 1.68 ± 0.18, P = .007), and had significantly less proximal humeral HU (-1.4 ± 17.7 vs. 78.8 ± 52.4, P = .001). The receiver operating characteristic curve for DTI had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86, and bone density in HU had an AUC of 0.98 in its ability to distinguish patients who underwent stemless TSA vs. short-stem TSA. A threshold cutoff of 1.41 for DTI resulted in a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 60%, and a cutoff value of 14.4 HU resulted in a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Older age, lower DTI, and less proximal humeral bone density in HU were associated with the requirement to switch from stemless to short-stem humeral fixation in primary TSA. Preoperative DTI had good ability (AUC of 0.86) and preoperative HU had excellent ability (AUC of 0.98) to categorize patients as appropriate for stemless TSA. This can help surgeons adequately plan humeral fixation using standard preoperative imaging data.

Current Concepts in Humeral Component Design for Anatomic and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

The history of humeral component design has evolved from prostheses with relatively long stems and limited anatomic head options to a contemporary platform with short stems and stemless implants with shared instrumentation and the ability to provide optimal shoulder reconstruction for both anatomic and reverse configurations. Contemporary humeral components aim to preserve the bone, but they are potentially subject to malalignment. Modern components are expected to favorably load the humerus and minimize adverse bone reactions. Although there will likely continue to be further refinements in humeral component design, the next frontiers in primary shoulder arthroplasty will revolve around designing an optimal plan, including adequate soft tissue tension and providing computer-assisted tools for the accurate execution of the preoperative plan in the operating room.

Initial Assessments of a Handheld Indentation Probe's Correlation With Cancellous Bone Density, Stiffness, and Strength: An Objective Alternative to “Thumb Testing”

Objective: During shoulder arthroplasty, surgeons must select the optimal implant for each patient. The metaphyseal bone properties affect this decision; however, the typical resection “thumb test” lacks objectivity. This investigation's purposes were to determine the correlation strength between the indentation depth of a handheld mechanism and the density, compressive strength, and modulus of a bone surrogate; as well as to assess how changing the indenter tip shape and impact energy may affect the correlation strengths. Methods: A spring-loaded indenter was developed. Four tip shapes (needle, tapered, flat, and radiused cylinders) and four spring energies (0.13 J–0.76J) were assessed by indenting five cellular foam bone surrogates of varying density, every five times. After each indentation, the indentation depth was measured with a separate probe and correlated with manufacturer specifications of the apparent density, compressive strength, and modulus. Results: indentation depth plateaued as the bone surrogate's material properties increased, particularly for indentation tips with larger footprints and the 0.13 J spring. All tip shapes produced strong (R2≥0.7) power-law relationships between the indentation depth metric and the bone surrogate's material properties (density: 0.70 ≤ R2 ≤ 0.95, strength: 0.75 ≤ R2 ≤ 0.97, modulus: 0.70 ≤ R2 ≤ 0.93); though the use of the needle tip yielded the widest indentation depth scale. Interpretation: these strong correlations suggest that a handheld indenter may provide objective intra-operative evidence of cancellous material properties. Further investigations are warranted to study indenter tip shape and spring energy in human tissue; though the needle tip with spring energy between 0.30 J and 0.76 J seems the most promising.

Long-term survival and failure analysis of anatomical stemmed and stemless shoulder arthroplasties

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical results, long-term survival, and complication rates of stemless shoulder prosthesis with stemmed anatomical shoulder prostheses for treatment of osteoarthritis and to analyze radiological bone changes around the implants during follow-up.

METHODS

A total of 161 patients treated with either a stemmed or a stemless shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 118 months (102 to 158). The Constant score (CS), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, and active range of motion (ROM) were recorded. Radiological analysis for bone adaptations was performed by plain radiographs. A Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was calculated and complications were noted.

RESULTS

The ROM (p < 0.001), CS (p < 0.001), and DASH score (p < 0.001) showed significant improvements after shoulder arthroplasty for both implants. There were no differences between the groups treated with stemmed or stemless shoulder prosthesis with respect to the mean CS (79.2 (35 to 118) vs 74.4 (31 to 99); p = 0.519) and DASH scores (11.4 (8 to 29) vs 13.2 (7 to 23); p = 0.210). The ten-year unadjusted cumulative survival rate was 95.3% for the stemmed anatomical shoulder prosthesis and 91.5% for the stemless shoulder prosthesis and did not differ between the treatment groups (p = 0.251). The radiological evaluation of the humeral components in both groups did not show loosening of the humeral implant. The main reason for revision for each type of arthroplasties were complications related to the glenoid.

CONCLUSION

The use of anatomical stemless shoulder prosthesis yielded good and reliable results and did not differ from anatomical stemmed shoulder prosthesis over a mean period of ten years. The differences in periprosthetic humeral bone adaptations between both implants have no clinical impact during the follow-up. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7):1292-1300.

Regional apparent density correlations within the proximal humerus

Background

Bone quality influences humeral implant selection for shoulder arthroplasty. However, little is known about how well bone near the humeral resection represents more distal cancellous bone. This investigation aimed to quantify the correlations between the apparent density of sites near the humeral head resection plane and cancellous sites throughout the metaphysis.

Methods

Using computed tomography data from 98 subjects, apparent bone density was quantified in 65 regions throughout the proximal humerus. Pearson's correlation coefficient was determined comparing the density between samples from the humeral resection and all supporting regions beneath the resection. Mean correlation coefficients were compared for (i) each sample region with all support regions, (ii) pooling all sample regions within a slice, and (iii) considering sample regions correlated with only the support regions in the same anatomic section.

Results

Stronger correlations existed for bone sampled beneath the resection (0.33 ± 0.10≤ r ≤ 0.88 ± 0.10), instead of from the resected humeral head (0.22 ± 0.10≤ r ≤ 0.66 ± 0.14). None of sample region correlated strongly with all support regions; however, strong correlations existed when sample and support regions both came from the same anatomic section.

Discussion

Assessments of cancellous bone quality in the proximal humerus should be made beneath the humeral resection not in the resected humeral head; and each anatomic quadrant should be assessed independently.

Osseous changes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty combined with latissimus dorsi transfer: a case series

Background

This is the first report on the incidence of proximal humerus osseous changes and associated clinical consequences in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty combined with a latissimus dorsi tendon transfer (RTSA+LDT).

Methods

A multicenter, retrospective review identified all patients who had undergone a primary RTSA+LDT and had at least 3-month radiographic follow-up between 2012 and 2017. Data collection included demographics, oral steroid use, repair technique for LDT fixation, radiographic humeral osseous changes, complications, and need for revision surgery.

Results

Twenty-four patients were included with an average age of 70.7 ± 7.9 years and follow-up of 16.3 (3-50) months. Ten patients (41.7%) developed osseous changes at the transfer location. There was no increased risk of developing osseous changes based on the surgical fixation technique (P = .421). Average time to earliest radiographic detection of osseous changes was 2.7 ± 1.7 months, with all changes occurring at or before 6 months. Two patients developed proximal humerus fractures, of which 1 had osseous changes through which the fracture occurred.

Discussion

RTSA+LDT may place the proximal humeral cortex at greater risk than previously described. Using a long-stem prosthesis in the setting of RTSA+LDT may limit the consequences of this complication.

The effect of stemless humeral component fixation feature design on bone stress and strain response: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Since the advent of stemless implants, several different fixation feature designs have been used to improve primary implant stability. These stemless designs are diverse, and the rationale for their selection and design has not been thoroughly studied. Accordingly, this investigation assessed the effect of stemless implant geometry on the simulated stress and strain response of the proximal humerus.

METHODS

Five humeral finite element models were used to examine 10 generic stemless implants with variable fixation features (2 central, 4 peripheral, and 4 boundary crossing). Loads representing 45° and 75° of shoulder abduction were simulated. Implants were compared based on the percentage of implant-bone surface area that remained in contact, the change in bone stress relative to the intact state, and the simulated potential for bone to resorb, remodel, or remain unchanged after reconstruction.

RESULTS

The implant-bone contact area was greatest for peripheral, followed by central and boundary-crossing designs. All implants elicited similar bone stress variations, which were greatest 0 to 5 mm beneath the resection and laterally. The simulated potential cortical response was also similar for all implants, with the greatest simulated resorbing potential 0 to 15 mm beneath the resection, and very little expected remodeling. Differences between implants were most prominent within the simulated potential trabecular response, with the central implants having the least bone volume percentage expected to resorb.

CONCLUSIONS

Simulated humeral bone response after stemless anatomic shoulder replacement depends on fixation feature geometry. Trade-offs exist between implant types. Centrally pegged implants produced the lowest simulated resorbing potential, whereas peripheral implants had the greatest percentages of implant-bone contact area.