Mobile Smartphone Thermal Imaging Characterization and Identification of Microvascular Flow Insufficiencies in Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Free Flaps

Free Flap Monitoring Using Infrared Thermography: An Objective Adjunct to Clinical Monitoring

Background  Early detection of free flap compromise is critical for salvage of the flap. Various methods of free flap monitoring have been described, but clinical assessment is the standard method for among all. In this study, role of infrared thermography is evaluated for free flap monitoring. Materials and Methods  In patients undergoing free flap surgery, monitoring was done using standard clinical parameters and infrared thermography as per our institutional protocol. Mean temperature difference (∆T) between the flap and the surrounding skin was calculated using the temperature readings from the thermal images intra- and postoperatively. The accuracy of infrared thermography in flap monitoring was assessed in comparison to the standard clinical protocol. Results  Forty-one flaps were included in the analysis, out of which five flaps got compromised. It was observed that the mean temperature difference was higher (mean ∆T 0.20-0.59 vs. 2.38-3.32) when there was a flap compromise, and this temperature difference was evident even before the development of clinical signs. The temperature difference in venous thrombosis (mean ∆T 1.0-2.7) was found to be slightly lower than in arterial insufficiency (mean ∆T 2.1-4.4). For a ∆T cutoff value of 2°C, the thermal camera had a sensitivity of 88.6%, specificity of 98.9%, positive predictive value of 93.9%, and negative predictive value of 97.7%. Conclusion  Infrared thermography is a valuable and noninvasive objective tool in free flap monitoring, which can detect flap compromise (increasing value of ∆T) even before it becomes clinically evident.

The Utility of Smartphone-Based Thermal Imaging in the Management and Monitoring of Microvascular Flap Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Smartphone-based thermal imaging (SBTI) has been reported in the literature to be an easy-to-use, contactless, cost-friendly alternative to standard imaging modalities in identifying flap perforators, monitoring flap perfusion, and detecting flap failure. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate SBTI's accuracy in perforator identification and secondarily evaluate SBTI's utility in flap perfusion monitoring as well as ability to predict flap compromise, failure, and survival.

METHODS

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, a systematic review was performed using PubMed from inception to 2021. Articles were uploaded into Covidence and, following duplicate deletion, were initially screened for use of SBTI in flap procedures through title and abstract screening followed by full-text review. The following data points, if provided, were extracted from each included study: study design, number of patients, patient demographics, perforator number and location, flap number and location, room temperature, cooling method, imaging distance, time from cloth removal, primary (SBTI's accuracy in perforator identification), and secondary outcomes (prediction of flap compromise/failure/survival and cost analysis). Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan v.5.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 153 articles. Eleven applicable studies with a total of 430 flaps from 416 patients were ultimately included. The SBTI device assessed in all included studies was FLIR ONE. Four studies assessed the SBTI's perforated detection ability and were included in meta-analysis. Smartphone-based thermal imaging correctly identified 378 (93.3%; n = 405) perforators, and computed tomography angiography (CTA) correctly identified 402 (99.2%; n = 402), although in one study SBTI found additional perforators not detected on CTA. A random-effects model was used (I2 = 65%), and no significant difference in perforator detection ability was found between SBTI and CTA (P = 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis supports SBTI as user- and cost-friendly ($229.99), contactless imaging modality with perforator detection ability comparable to current criterion-standard CTA. Postoperatively, SBTI outperformed Doppler ultrasound in early detection of microvascular changes causing flap compromise, allowing for prompt tissue salvage. With a minimal learning curve, SBTI seems to be a promising method of postoperative flap perfusion monitoring able to be used by all hospital ranks. Smartphone-based thermal imaging could thus increase flap monitoring frequency and lower complication rates, although further study is warranted.

[Application of infrared thermography technique to assist peroneal artery perforator flap in the repair of oral and maxillofacial defects]

Objective

To explore the application value of infrared thermography (IRT) technique assisted peroneal artery perforator flap in repairing oral and maxillofacial defects.

Methods

The clinical data of 20 patients with oral and maxillofacial malignant tumors treated with peroneal artery perforator flap between October 2020 and December 2021 were retrospectively analysed. There were 13 males and 7 females, with an average age of 56.5 years (range, 32-76 years). There were 8 cases of tongue cancer, 5 cases of parotid gland cancer, 4 cases of buccal cancer, and 3 cases of mandibular gingival cancer; and 12 cases of squamous cell carcinoma, 3 cases of adenoid cystic carcinoma, and 5 cases of mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) and IRT technique were performed before operation to locate the peroneal artery perforator and assist in the design of the flap. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CDU and IRT technique were compared with the actual exploration during operation. The accuracy of CDU and IRT technique in detecting the number of peroneal artery perforator and the most viable perforating points was compared. The patients were followed up regularly to observe the recovery of donor and recipient sites, the occurrence of complications, and the recurrence and metastasis of tumors.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of peroneal artery perforators detected by IRT technique before operation were 72.22%, 50.00%, 92.86%, and 16.67% respectively, which were higher than those by CDU (64.17%, 33.33%, 84.62%, and 14.29% respectively). Forty-five peroneal artery perforators were found by CDU before operation, and 35 were confirmed during operation, with an accuracy rate of 77.8%; 43 "hot spots" were found by IRT technique, and 32 peroneal artery perforators were confirmed within the "hot spots" range during operation, with an accuracy rate of 74.4%; there was no significant difference between the two methods ( χ²=0.096, P=0.757). The accuracy rates of the most viable perforating points found by CDU and IRT technique were 80.95% (17/21) and 94.74% (18/19), respectively, and there was no significant difference between them ( χ²=0.115, P=0.734). The localization errors of CDU and IRT technique were (5.12±2.10) and (4.23±1.87) mm, respectively, and there was no significant difference between them ( t=1.416, P=0.165). All the perforator flaps survived, and the incisions of donor and recipient sites healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 5-18 months, with an average of 11 months. The skin flap was soft and had good blood supply, and the lower limb scar was concealed and the lower limb had good function. No lower limb swelling, pain, numbness, ankle instability, or other complications occurred, and no tumor recurrence and metastasis were found during the follow-up.

Conclusion

Compared with the CDU, using the IRT technique to assist the preoperative peroneal artery perforator flap design to repair the oral and maxillofacial defects has a high clinical application value.

Characterization of Baseline Temperature Characteristics Using Thermography in The Clinical Setting

BACKGROUND

Thermography is a diagnostic method based on the ability to record infrared radiation emitted by the skin and is unique in its ability to accurately show physiological and/or pathological cutaneous temperature changes in a non-invasive way. This method can be used to indirectly assess changes or impairments in cutaneous perfusion. Significant technological advancements have allowed thermography to be more commonly utilized by clinicians, yet a basic consensus of patient characteristics that may affect temperature recordings is not established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated cutaneous temperature in a cohort of outpatients to understand what factors, including tobacco use and other high-risk characteristics, contribute to cutaneous tissue perfusion as measured by thermography. Participants were prospectively enrolled if they were a combustible cigarette smoker, an electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) user, or a never smoker. Standardized thermographic images of the subject's facial profiles, forearms, and calves were taken and demographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, and tobacco product use were assessed. These variables were statistically tested for associations with temperature at each anatomic site.

RESULTS

We found that gender had a significant effect on thermographic temperature that differed by anatomic site, and we found a lack of significant difference in thermographic temperature by race. Our regression analysis did not support significant differences in thermographic temperatures across smoking groups, while there was a trend for decreased perfusion in smokers relative to non-smokers and e-cigarette users relative to non-smokers.

CONCLUSION

Thermographic imaging is a useful tool for clinical and research use with consideration of sex and other perfusion-affecting characteristics.