Maximizing Benefit of Virtual Learning: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Perceptions of online surgical-focused learning amongst surgeons during the COVID pandemic: A scoping review 2020-22

INTRODUCTION

During the COVID pandemic many centres adopted e-learning as a tool to adhere to social distancing recommendations while continuing to provide ongoing postgraduate medical education. We aimed to complete this scoping review in order to map experience and perceptions amongst surgeons and surgical trainees to remote learning during the COVID pandemic.

METHODS

Using Arksey and O'Malley's five step model for conducting a scoping review, a systematic search strategy was undertaken across three online databases SCOPUS, MEDLINE and Web of Science. Only original articles in English in the field of postgraduate education in surgery were included.

RESULTS

44 studies were selected for review. Of these 44, 21 were studies of perception of a newly developed e-learning tool/platform. 17 were surveys of surgeon's attitudes towards e-learning during the COVID pandemic. The remaining 6 studies were studies of knowledge or skills acquired through new e-learning, which included a survey of experience. The United States was the most common country of origin with General Surgery the most represented surgical speciality. Response rates across all three study subgroups were on average >60%. Surgeon's experience of e-learning was reported in only positive terms in 86% (n = 38/44) of studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper is informative in that it focuses specifically on surgeons' perceptions of a e-learning tools used in addition to skills or knowledge gained. Positive e-learning experience reported in these studies may lead to more blended learning curriculums being developed, deployed and evaluated going forward.

A narrative medicine intervention in pediatric residents led to sustained improvements in resident well-being

BACKGROUND

Burnout in pediatric residents is widespread. Certain factors are associated with decreased burnout, such as empathy, self-compassion, mindfulness, and resilience, while perceived stress is associated with increased burnout. Narrative medicine may reduce burnout by its impact on protective and exacerbating factors and can be an active tool to promote wellness. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate immediate and delayed benefits of a longitudinal narrative medicine intervention for pediatric residents using qualitative and quantitative measures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We designed a voluntary longitudinal narrative medicine intervention implemented via Zoom teleconferencing software over five months for pediatric residents at Nationwide Children's Hospital. It consisted of six one-hour long sessions where residents engaged with literature, responded to a writing prompt, and shared their reflections. It was evaluated using open-ended survey questions and established quantitative assessment tools of well-being with validity evidence. Results were compared before the intervention, immediately after, and six months later using one-way ANOVA and multiple linear regression. Qualitative data was analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-two (14% of eligible) residents participated in at least one session. After the intervention, the following themes emerged for benefits to resident well-being: the ability to Build Community, have an Outlet for Self-Expression, reap Emotional and Mental Health Benefits, and work on Personal Growth. Benefits were sustained even six months later, which has not been shown previously. While there were significant qualitative findings, between all three time points, there was no change in any quantitative well-being measures.

CONCLUSION

Our longitudinal narrative medicine pilot study showed meaningful sustained qualitative benefits, though no quantitative changes, in measured well-being outcomes that have been previously associated with lower resident burnout. While not a panacea, narrative medicine can be a useful strategy for residency programs to improve pediatric resident well-being even after completion of planned interventions.Key MessageWe used a mixed-methods approach to assess the effects of a longitudinal narrative medicine intervention on well-being in pediatric residents.Open-ended responses indicated that residents found utility in and appreciated the intervention and experienced sustained improvements in their mental and emotional health, though the sample size was likely too small to show quantitative changes in well-being measures.Narrative medicine is not a panacea, but it can be a useful tool to provide to pediatric residents to promote sustained improvements in their well-being through the framework of relationship-centered care.

Shifts in the genetic counseling workforce highlight a need for laboratory fieldwork experience for genetic counseling trainees

As the genetic counseling workforce experiences an increase in genetic counselors (GCs) in non-direct patient care roles, it is essential that genetic counseling students are trained in these settings. The Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling (ACGC) standards regarding laboratory exposure have evolved over time, but laboratory fieldwork experience continues to remain a suggestion for a diversified setting. As more trainees seek laboratory exposure and an increasing number of new graduates opt for laboratory positions, learning firsthand from GCs employed in this setting is a valuable experience that should be available to all trainees. Historically, laboratory educational offerings consisted of onsite rotations for students from local training programs focused on understanding diagnostic testing methodologies and shadowing GCs. Through the years, multiple laboratories have expanded their curriculums to expose students to variant interpretation and report writing, research, client services, marketing, and product development. Alongside the growth of laboratory rotation curriculum grew opportunities for remote rotations. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, GeneDx offered remote education options including both individualized rotations and a webinar series. These offerings expanded due to the pandemic coupled with increased demand and have positive implications for future trainees. The evolution of the rotation also included conscious efforts to incorporate diversity, equity, and inclusion into the curriculum, as well as to improved accessibility to laboratory rotations. Notably, there are inconsistencies in laboratory rotation curricula and requirements, and a standardized evaluation and definition of competencies are lacking. ACGC guidelines defining common core concepts required from laboratory rotations would help ensure students receive an equitable minimum skill set, regardless of training site. Stakeholders in GC education should collaborate to enhance the experiences of future trainees and provide the skills needed by a workforce shifting to remote work and increasing numbers of non-direct patient-facing laboratory roles. Drawing upon our years of experience, GeneDx aims to actively contribute to discussions around these questions. Alongside other laboratories and training programs, we hope to foster further innovation surrounding the training needs of our future GC colleagues. This educational innovation illustrates an approach to helping genetic counseling students achieve competencies related to lab-based roles.

Virtual learning in maxillofacial surgery in the post-COVID world: where are we now?

During the COVID-19 pandemic we developed a post-graduate virtual learning environment (PGVLE) in the West Midlands region for higher trainees in oral and maxillofacial surgery. We continued to develop this following the pandemic and sought to examine the trainee experience with this resource as restrictions eased. The PGVLE comprises a total of nine semesters mapping General Medical Council (GMC) learning objectives in the specialty across a total of 63 events using BigBlueButton™. Webinars are delivered on a weekly basis by subspecialty experts. Trainee feedback was sought using SurveyMonkey™ examining self-assessed confidence levels using visual analogue scores (VAS) and Likert items regarding trainers and content. A focus group was convened and the transcript analysed using grounded theory analysis (GTA). Likert items revealed overwhelmingly positive responses, with 96.2% (n = 281) of responses being positive regarding content and 97.5% (n = 475) agreeing with positive comments regarding faculty. VAS scores improved by an average of 39.0% and improvements were statistically significant for most sessions. The focus group highlighted the relevance of teaching to GMC learning objectives, the achievement of consistently high standards, the potential for conflict with clinical commitments and issues surrounding peer interaction. Satisfaction scores remain high with the PGVLE programme, which is very much here to stay in the post-graduate education of our trainees. With the easing of restrictions, we have moved to a hybrid method of learning with the potential for 'flipped classroom' methodology moving forwards.