Decreasing Incisional Hernia by Teaching 4:1 Suture to Wound Length Ratio Early in Surgical Education

Educating Residents in Abdominal Wall Closure: An Overview

Background and Aims: Incisional hernia prevention has become an important concept for surgeons operating on the abdominal wall. Several techniques have been proposed to help decrease incisional hernia formation with suture closure of the abdominal wall being one of the cornerstones. Technical details that have been reported to decrease incisional hernia rates include achieving a 4:1 Suture to Wound length ratio and the use of a small bites technique. Despite evidence to support many of these techniques there appears to be a gap in practice patterns amongst practicing surgeons. Introducing and promoting these principles in surgical residency may help to close this gap. This paper reviews our experience with surgical training for abdominal wall closures at our institution. Materials and Methods: Programs and projects related to abdominal wall closure were reviewed from our institution from 2010-Present. Type of project, intervention, and impact on education was evaluated and summarized. Results: Seven projects were identified relating to surgical training and abdominal wall closure. Three projects dealt with skills training using an abdominal wall simulation model and related to suturing techniques. Two projects were clinical studies focused on suture to wound length ratios and improving outcomes with this variable in a residency training program. Two projects dealt with models relating to abdominal wall closure and education. Conclusion: Implementation of educational programs in surgical residency programs can lead to improvements in technique and knowledge around abdominal wall closure and help in research endeavors.

Teaching Small Bite Fascial Closure Technique: Improved Accuracy and Consistency Through Simulation

Despite evidence that small bite closure is beneficial, it is not well documented how accurately and consistently surgeons employ this technique. We created a felt model to simulate fascial closure and educate residents regarding small bites. This study aims to gauge accuracy and consistency of bite size in fascial closure and assess if utilizing a templated model could improve technique. Two 10 cm incisions were made in different pieces of felt. Residents were instructed to suture the incisions to simulate fascial closure by running the incisions closed with 1 cm and 5 mm bites respectively. The process was repeated with templated pieces of felt marking 1 and 0.5 cm to guide bite size. Residents were timed for each closure. The travel and distance from the midline for each bite was measured and analysis performed. 14 residents participated. Paired T-test compared means and standard deviations of bite size. Taking 5 mm bites took more time. Standard deviation of travel and right sided distance from midline were significantly smaller when a template was utilized. Standard deviation of travel as well as right sided distance was also improved when instructed to take 5 mm bites. This study demonstrates that a small bite technique results more closure and that when residents are instructed to take smaller bites. The adage, "aim small, miss small," holds true in fascial closure and may be one reason why small bites improve hernia rates. This study also suggests that the use of a template improves accuracy and consistency of closure regardless of bite size intention.

Effect of Suture Length on the Incidence of Incisional Hernia and Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Midline Laparotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The development of an incisional hernia is a common complication of midline laparotomy. Improper fascial closure techniques have a significant role in its development. It can also lead to poor wound healing and increase the risk of developing surgical site infections (SSI). Upon conducting a thorough literature review, various studies have been conducted on closing abdominal wounds. However, there is a dearth of studies portraying the role of suture length in the prevention of incisional hernia and SSI. The effect of using a greater suture-to-wound length ratio on postoperative outcomes was not clearly analyzed or described. The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of using a suture length to wound length ratio ≥4:1 versus a ratio <4:1 in preventing postoperative complications such as incisional hernia and SSI. This study is a systematic review of randomized controlled trials on abdominal wound closure using a suture length to wound length ratio of ≥4:1 and <4:1. published in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined. The relevant studies identified from 1991 to 2017, were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was the incidence of incisional hernia, and the secondary outcome was the incidence of SSI. This meta-analysis considered five randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of using different suture length to wound length ratios during abdominal closure on incisional hernia and SSI. Participants ranged in size from 100 to 363. The trial follow-up period ranged from a minimum of 10 months to five years. The outcomes studied in the two groups were incisional hernia and SSI. The relative risk of the occurrence of incisional hernia if the suture length to wound length ratio was ≥4:1 was 0.42 with a p-value of <0.001 which was considered significant. This implied that using a suture length of more than four times that of the wound i.e., 4:1, significantly decreases the risk of developing an incisional hernia by more than half. The relative risk of developing a SSI was 0.98 with a p-value of 0.966. Thus, this method of abdominal closure uing a longer suture length to wound length ratio does not contribute to an increased incidence or significant change in the risk of developing SSI.