Bleeding Complications following Image-Guided Percutaneous Biopsies in Patients Taking Clopidogrel—A Retrospective Review

Low Utility of Screening Hematologic Testing for Image-Guided Biopsies in Patients Without Bleeding Risks

OBJECTIVE. This study evaluates the prevalence of an abnormal international normalized ratio (INR) and platelet count before image-guided percutaneous needle biopsies over a 10-year period, comparing data from patients with and those without known conditions predisposing to coagulopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A review of electronic medical records identified patients who were scheduled for a biopsy in a single institution's radiology department for the period of 2007-2016. The following information was recorded: demographic data, patient history of conditions that predispose to bleeding (e.g., liver disease, anticoagulant therapy, history of coagulopathy), and INR and platelet values within 30 days before biopsy. Data were stratified by biopsies that were performed versus those that were cancelled. RESULTS. Over 10 years, 3864 percutaneous biopsies were performed, and 6371 were cancelled. Approximately half of the biopsies (48.2%) were performed in patients without a predisposing condition; of those patients, 0.8% and 0.1% had an INR greater than 1.5 and greater than 1.8, respectively, and 0.4% had a platelet count of 50,000/μL or less (≤ 50 × 10⁹/L). In patients with no known predisposing condition, 0.6% and 0.0% of biopsies cancelled were in patients who had an INR greater than 1.5 and greater than 1.8, respectively, and 0.1% of biopsies cancelled were in patients who had a platelet count of 50,000/μL or less. Ordering prebiopsy testing of patients with no predisposing conditions for the 1864 percutaneous biopsies performed over the 10-year study period resulted in more than $850,000 in laboratory-related health care costs. Our results suggest that the cost of identifying one abnormal INR is nearly $700,000. CONCLUSION. For patients without any known bleeding risks who are scheduled to undergo image-guided percutaneous biopsies, identifying an abnormal INR or abnormal platelet count is rare. Eliminating this testing in patients without predisposing conditions has the potential to create savings in costs and time for both physicians and patients.

Tissue sampling in the era of precision medicine: comparison of percutaneous biopsies performed for clinical trials or tumor genomics versus routine clinical care

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to determine if patients undergoing percutaneous biopsy for genetic profiling are undergoing more biopsies (procedures, passes per procedure), or experiencing more procedure-related complications.

METHODS

60 patients undergoing biopsy procedures for genetic profiling were retrospectively compared with 60 consecutive control patients undergoing routine biopsies. Procedural details and related complications were collected. Results were analyzed using t-tests and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Biopsied organs included mainly lung (n = 31), liver (n = 50), and lymph nodes (n = 18). The average number of core biopsy passes was 3.45 in the study group and 2.18 in the control group (0.73, 1.81; p = 0.0001). The average study patient underwent 1.44 biopsy procedures by radiology from 2016 to 2017, whereas the average control patient underwent 1.08 (0.1657, 0.5010, p = 0.0002). Results were similar when looking at the subset of patients undergoing liver biopsies. In our cohort of 120 patients total, only 6 complications were noted. There were 4 complications in the control patients and 2 complications in the study patients, all of which were pneumothoraces in patients undergoing lung biopsy; only 2 of these required treatment. The odds ratio for a complication occurring from an increase in one core biopsy is 1.07 (0.601, 1.573; p = 0.775), suggesting no significant relationship among the number of biopsies taken and the probability of complication in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients being biopsied for genetic profiling or clinical study enrollment are undergoing more biopsy procedures and more biopsy passes per procedure, but are not experiencing a detectable increased rate of complications in this small cohort, single-center study.

Complications of Percutaneous Renal Biopsy

Percutaneous renal biopsy is widely used for diagnosis, prognosis, and management of nephropathies. Complications may arise after renal biopsy, most commonly in the form of bleeding. Efforts should be taken to optimize modifiable risk factors such as hypertension, thrombocytopenia, and coagulopathy prior to the procedure. Unmodifiable risk factors such as poor renal function, gender, and underlying histologic diagnosis may be used to identify high-risk patients. Delayed presentation of bleeding complications is common, and close clinical follow-up is crucial.

Percutaneous pleural drainage in patients taking clopidogrel: real danger or phantom fear?

Despite being categorized as a procedure associated with a low risk of iatrogenic hemorrhage, percutaneous pleural drainage in patients taking the ubiquitous antiplatelet agent clopidogrel is still commonly perceived as a risky proposition. There is mounting evidence, however, in support of the safety of percutaneous needle procedures in persons receiving this medication. Establishing that these pleural interventions can be performed safely without clopidogrel interruption would be of great clinical significance, especially in those taking it for recent cardiac stenting and therefore in danger of stent thrombosis should antiplatelet therapy (APT) be withheld. The purpose of the present review is to summarize the available data from published studies and series of thoracentesis and chest tube insertion in patients exposed to clopidogrel. Also incorporated into this review are relevant investigations from the thoracic surgery and interventional radiology experience, which contribute indirect evidence and help shape the context for interpreting the safety data reported in the pleural literature. At the end, an attempt is made to synthesize the current knowledge on this topic into conclusions for guiding practice.

Management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing interventional pulmonary procedures

There has been great progress in antithrombotic therapy over the past several years. Its use has increased with the advent of novel anticoagulants, as these medications do not require frequent blood tests for monitoring. Antithrombotic therapy is aimed at reducing the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, deep vein thrombosis, valvular heart disease and pulmonary embolism. These patients are often critically ill and frequently undergo urgent interventions requiring discontinuation of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy which can increase the risk of thrombosis; however, continuing these agents can lead to increased risk of haemorrhage.

The purpose of this article is to summarise the literature surrounding the safety of using antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies in patients undergoing interventional pulmonary procedures.

Available studies suggest some antithrombotic agents may be used in interventional pulmonary procedureshttp://ow.ly/vSF030bRqjt