A Preliminary Study of Vocal Health Among Collegiate A Cappella Singers

Vocal Health Care amongst Hindustani Classical Singers- A Mixed Methods, Cross-Sectional Survey

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the present survey was to profile the knowledge, attitude, and practices towards vocal health care amongst Hindustani classical singers.

STUDY DESIGN

Mixed-methods, cross-sectional questionnaire-based study.

METHODS

A self-reported questionnaire was developed and used to gather data on the knowledge, attitude, and practices of Hindustani classical singers towards vocal health care. An online survey link was generated, and responses were collected from self-identified trained Hindustani classical singers. Descriptive statistics was carried out for the closed-ended questions and inductive approach was used to analyse the responses of open-ended questions.

RESULTS

Ninety-four self-identified trained Hindustani classical singers participated in the study. The responses indicate good knowledge towards vocal health measures and positive attitudes towards vocal health care. The open-ended responses were analysed using an inductive approach. Although, 70% were aware about role of a speech language pathologist, only 9.7% reported of consulting one in the event of voice problem. Further, 70% singers reported of following precautions to avoid voice problems while 85.1% considered voice rest as necessary before a performance. The singers reported of using home remedies, vocal and non-vocal measures as a part of vocal health measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study helps to profile the knowledge, attitude, and practices towards vocal health care amongst Hindustani classical singers. It also helps to provide a basis for further studies to establish an empirical basis for the reported practices towards vocal health care.

Potential Risks for Healthcare Disparities Among Individuals With Voice and Upper Airway Disorders: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To assess the potential epidemiological association between various possible risk factors and healthcare disparities specifically related to the access, use and/or quality of speech language pathology services for individuals with voice and upper airway disorders.

METHOD

A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Full text journal articles were identified through PubMed, PsycINFO and Web of Science. The reference sections of included articles were also manually screened and identified four additional studies for consideration of inclusion. Included articles specifically addressed healthcare disparities in voice and upper airway disorders related to speech pathology care. International literature was excluded. Eligible studies were reviewed and data extracted. Risk of bias of each eligible study was performed using the quality assessment tool from National Institute of Health for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. Data from eligible studies were synthesized thematically.

RESULTS

A total of 1,101 resources were retrieved from the search; of these, 133 were duplicates. Titles and abstracts of 968 articles were screened, with 14 selected for full-text review. Eleven articles were considered eligible for inclusion. Voice disorders were the condition most frequently examined followed by only one article addressing upper airways disorders. There was considerable heterogeneity in the methodology and statistical analyses among the eligible papers. There was a lack of standard methodology for collecting and accurately determining patient characteristics as well as variability in measuring confounding variables and providing statistical analyses for such adjustments that may have impacted the findings. The information extracted from these articles revealed healthcare disparities related to sex/gender, age, insurance status/coverage, race/ethnicity, among others including etiology and preferred language.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review highlights the limited research on speech language pathology-specific healthcare disparities for individuals with voice and upper airway disorders. There was significant clinical and methodological heterogeneity between studies which may have contributed to varied results between studies. There is a need for greater methodological rigor and prospectively designed studies to better characterize the impact of disparities in the access to, use of, and quality of speech pathology care for this patient population.

Looking for an Objective Parameter to Identify Early Vocal Dysfunctions in Healthy Perceived Singers

The finding of minimal laryngeal dysfunctions in professional voice users is essential to prevent the onset of organic vocal pathologies. The purpose of this study is to identify an objective parameter that supports the phoniatric evaluation in detecting minimal laryngeal dysfunctions in singers. 54 professional and non-professional singers have been evaluated with laryngostroboscopy, Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP), Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), maximum phonation time (TMF), minimum intensity of sound emission (I-min), maximum frequency (F-max), voice handicap index (VHI), singing voice handicap index (SVHI), manual phonogram and audiometric examination. The SVHI of all the "healthy" singers was on average 23.7 ± 22.5, while that of the "dysfunctional" 20.9 ± 18. No statistically significant difference was found between the SVHI scores of the total of healthy singers compared to the scores of the dysfunctional ones on the VSL (p = 0.6). The between-group comparison of the means of individual parameter values of DSI, TMF, F-max, Jitter, Shimmer, NHR, and SPI was not statistically significant (respectively p = 0.315, 0.2, 0.18, 0.09, 0.2, 0.08, 0.3). The only parameter analyzed that was statistically significant was the I-min (p < 0.05). SVHI is a valid instrument for the evaluation after a therapy but in our experience, it is not useful in distinguishing healthy from dysfunctional patients. The minimum intensity of sound emission measured with the sound level meter (I-low2) resulted a reliable parameter to identify minimal laryngeal dysfunctions and a useful tool in supporting the phoniatric diagnostic-therapeutic process in singers.

Carnatic Classical Singers' Interest and Knowledge Levels of Vocal Function and Dysfunction: A Cross-sectional Survey

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to determine the interest and knowledge levels of Indian Carnatic classical singers concerning the vocal function and dysfunction.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

METHODS

Self-reporting vocal awareness questionnaire for singers comprising 61 items under nine sections developed by Braum-Janzen and Zeine was adopted and validated to the Carnatic music context. The data was gathered using the snowball sampling method. Each participant spent 10-15 minutes to fill the questionnaire. The 100 participants were divided into two groups based on years of individual singing experience, group 1: Singers with less than 10 years, group 2: Singers with greater than 10 years of individual singing experience.

RESULTS

Few singers reported a thorough understanding in all areas except anatomy and physiology of voice production. As indicated by most of the singers, they were very much interested in expanding their knowledge in (1) the anatomy and physiology of the voice, (2) the role of the speech-language pathologist (SLP) and the voice, (3) the care of the voice, (4) optimal use of the speaking voice, and (5) functional vocal disorders. Further, in both the groups, there was a high number of incorrect and don't know responses. Differences in knowledge levels and interest levels between the two groups were non-significant in all areas (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Overall, the high number of incorrect and don't know responses suggest that many Carnatic singers do not have even basic knowledge of vocal function and dysfunction, and could benefit from education in these areas. Hence, SLPs need to develop education programs for Carnatic singers towards vocal function and dysfunction so that the development of voice problems in Carnatic singers can be prevented.

Vocal Hygiene in Collegiate Singers-Does Formal Training Relate to Practices?

BACKGROUND

Vocal hygiene is vitally important for protecting vocal quality and promoting vocal longevity. It includes adequate hydration, avoidance of environmental irritants, and refraining from phonotraumatic behaviors such as screaming, excessive talking, and throat clearing. Formal singing training in addition to enhancing singing techniques, is also assumed to promote good vocal hygiene. Consequently, we investigated whether collegiate singers with formal training are more likely to practice good vocal hygiene habits than untrained collegiate singers.

METHODS

We completed a prospective cohort study, where collegiate singers at Stanford University were voluntarily enrolled in an annual vocal health clinic. Full laryngeal exams were performed and demographic information, formal vocal training status, and information on vocal hygiene habits were obtained through questionnaires. The results were then analyzed by grouping singers as "untrained" if less than 1 year of formal training, and "trained" if greater than a year.

RESULTS

A total of 82 singers were included for analysis, with 49 (59.8%) having greater than one year of formal training. Trained singers were more likely to employ a primary musical singing style of classical or operatic singing compared to untrained singers who were more likely to utilize "R&B" (P < 0.001). No significant differences were found between groups for hydration practices (P = 0.20), caffeine consumption (P = 0.73), warm up practices (P = 0.08), and phonotraumatic behaviors. Alcohol consumption, smoking tobacco, marijuana, e-cigarette usage was similar between groups. Overall, 11% of our sample reported intermittent less than daily marijuana use, with one singer reporting daily consumption. None of the singers in this sample used e-cigarettes. These rates are noticeably lower than the agematched United States population. Perceptions of cigarettes, marijuana, electronic cigarettes, alcohol, and caffeine were also the same between groups, with the vast majority of singers perceiving these agents as harmful to the voice (64%-100% depending on the agent). No laryngeal pathology was identified during laryngeal examination of any singers.

CONCLUSIONS

Vocal hygiene habits are similar between trained and untrained collegiate singers. This likely relates to a desire for vocal longevity irrespective of prior training. This may dispel the long-held assumption that formal training was necessary to develop good vocal habits. We do however, present a very homogenous, highly educated sample of collegiate singers from Stanford University, having significantly less at-risk behavior than their aged-matched counterparts in the general US population. A lack of laryngeal pathology despite extensive vocal demands may also be reflective of good vocal hygiene habits.