Percutaneous treatment of symptomatic central venous stenosis angioplasty

The outcome of sharp recanalization of chronic central venous occlusions in patients undergoing hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Patients on hemodialysis are particularly vulnerable to central venous occlusion (CVO). Endovascular treatment has gained wide acceptance for the treatment of CVO. However, difficulties in crossing the occluded segment can be encountered during conventional endovascular management. Sharp recanalization has been adopted when conventional endovascular methods could not recanalize the obstructed region. This study aimed to assess the outcome of the sharp venous recanalization technique with angioplasty and stenting in the treatment of CVO in Egyptian patients undergoing hemodialysis.

METHODS

This retrospective study is based on data from a prospectively maintained department database of patients under regular hemodialysis who underwent the sharp venous recanalization technique for CVO. Routinely, the patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months with a clinical examination. The primary outcomes were technical success and primary patency. Secondary outcomes included complication rates and clinical success.

RESULTS

This study included 40 patients. Thirty-six patients (90%) achieved technical and clinical success. Seven patients (17.5%) had immediate postoperative complications. Four cases had minor complications (10%) and three patients had major complications (7.5%): hemothorax in two patients (5.1%) and pneumothorax in one patient (2.6%). At the 1-year follow-up, reintervention was required in nine patients (22.5%), with primary patency rate of 77.5% and a secondary patency rate of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Sharp recanalization offers a solution for patients undergoing hemodialysis who developed CVO and failed to be recanalized using the conventional endovascular method. It offered promising technical success, clinical improvement, and good primary patency rates.

Objective Performance Goals Based on a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes for Bare-Metal Stents and Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for Hemodialysis-Related Central Venous Obstruction

PURPOSE

To use safety and efficacy outcomes following treatment with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and/or stent placement for thoracic central venous obstruction in hemodialysis-dependent patients to establish objective performance goals (OPGs).

METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted for articles published between January 1, 2000, and August 31, 2021. Efficacy outcomes included primary patency rates at 6 and 12 months, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) categorized as access loss, procedure-related AEs, and serious AEs (SAEs). OPGs were derived from the upper and lower bounds of the 95% confidence intervals for primary patency and SAE rates.

RESULTS

Of 66 articles reviewed, 17 met the inclusion criteria (PTA, n = 4; stent placement, n = 5; PTA/stent, n = 8). The 6- and 12-month primary patency rates for PTA were 50.9% and 36.7%, respectively. Based on these findings, the proposed 6- and 12-month primary patency OPGs identifying superiority against PTA were 66.5% and 52.6%, respectively, and those for noninferiority were 39.0% and 25.7%, respectively. For stent placement, the 6- and 12-month primary patency rates were 69.7% and 47.9%, respectively. The proposed 6- and 12-month primary patency OPGs identifying superiority were 82.1% and 64.1%, respectively, and those for noninferiority were 59.3% and 35.8%, respectively. SAE rates for PTA and stent placement were 3.8% and 8.1%, respectively. Proposed safety OPGs for noninferiority versus superiority for PTA and stent placement were 10.1% versus 1.4% and 13.6% versus 4.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The OPGs derived from real-world studies of PTA and stent placement may serve as a benchmark for future interventions indicated for this patient population.

Spectrum of Interventional Procedures During Hybrid Central Line Placement in Pediatric Intestinal Rehabilitation Patients With End-Stage Vascular Access

Background

Loss of available central vein access sites for parenteral nutrition delivery represents one of the main indications for intestinal transplantation in children with intestinal failure. Placement of central venous catheters can be challenging in advanced loss of patent venous pathways. We recently described the hybrid technique (interventional plus surgical approach) of central line placement in children. The aim of this study was to describe and analyze the interventions used during the hybrid procedures regarding feasibility, safety and outcome.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the course of all children in our intestinal rehabilitation program undergoing hybrid central line placement. We evaluated patients' conditions, interventional techniques and surgical peculiarities as well as outcome.

Results

203 children were treated in our intestinal rehabilitation program between 2010 and 2021. Due to loss of venous access, hybrid technique was performed in 53 children during 76 interventions. In 40 cases the same vessel was reused via Seldinger technique. Among the 30 ultrasound-guided new vessel punctures, 12 were performed by puncture of collateral vessels. Extended interventions due to thoracic central venous obstruction and/or thrombosis requiring additional access via a femoral vein for rehabilitation of the vascular system was performed during 29 procedures including catheter extraction (1), angioplasties (18), stent placement (1), revascularization (5) and thrombectomy (4). Placement of a central line was not possible in 6 children which eventually underwent extended thoracic/vascular surgery: in three children the previously placed catheter could not be removed, in one child, placement of a thrombectomy-catheter was not possible because of inferior vena cava occlusion, and in two children, revascularization failed. Intestinal transplantation was considered in one patient because of impending loss of vascular access. Two self-limiting minor extravasations and one intervention-associated pericardial effusion occurred.

Conclusions

Hybrid interventions for central venous catheter placement and vascular rehabilitation enable a high success rate in children with intestinal failure and end-stage vascular access, circumventing the need for intestinal transplantation or advanced surgery. The relevant procedures are complex and require a foresighted and individualized approach with a wide range of interventional techniques. If performed with expertise, this combined interventional/surgical approach is feasible and safe.

Endovascular treatments of tunneled central venous catheter-induced superior vena cava complete occlusion via through-and-through technique

BACKGROUND

Superior vena cava occlusion (SVCO) induced by tunneled central venous catheter (tCVC) is an uncommon but challenging complication of hemodialysis patients. The aim of this study was to access the efficacy, safety, and patency of stents in tCVC-related SVCO via through-and-through technique.

METHOD

We retrospectively identified seven patients with benign SVCO secondary to tCVC treated with endovascular approaches successfully between 1 March 2013 and 31 October 2019. Patients' demographic data, clinical signs and symptoms, and imaging data were followed up and recorded.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in all cases. All the patients were performed with percutaneous transcatheter angioplasty (PTA) and subsequently stent placement via the through-and-through technique. During follow-up, four patients underwent secondary interventions, including PTA and/or stent placement. The primary patency after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months was 100%, 100%, 86% and 86%, and secondary patency after 12 months was 100%. No procedure-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular management of SVCO is a safe and effective approach. CT examination can provide a direction for endovascular treatment and periodic surveillance.

Efficacy of stent-graft placement to salvage central vein stents with recalcitrant restenosis in patients with arteriovenous fistulas

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness and permanency of stent-graft placement to salvage stents with recalcitrant restenosis due to central vein stenosis (CVS). Between May 2014 and February 2016, VIABAHN stent-grafts were deployed in patients with functioning arteriovenous (AV) fistulas who underwent previous bare metal stent (BMS) placement and had recalcitrant stent restenosis that did not respond to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). Surveillance was carried out at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months with diagnostic fistulography. Fourteen patients initially underwent 15 BMS placements. In the follow-up period (range, 118-976 days), patients presented with symptomatic venous hypertension; subsequently, a total of 52 unsuccessful repeat PTAs for BMS restenosis were undertaken, and the median primary access survival of PTAs was 66 ± 43 days. For salvage, 14 stent-grafts were placed in segments with recalcitrant restenosis of a CVS stent. Within 1.25 ± 0.72 days after stent-graft placement, patients who initially presented with symptomatic venous hypertension reported complete resolution. The median primary access survival (mean, 1183 ± 312 days) was longer than PTAs alone (P < .01). No major or minor complications were associated with stent-graft deployment or any of the subsequent interventions in the study period. The primary patency rate at 6, 12, and 18 months was 100%, and it was 85.7% at 24 months. The secondary access patency rate was 92.9% at 24 months. In conclusion, stent-graft placement to salvage CVS stents with recalcitrant restenosis in patients with AV fistulas is safe and effective if PTAs fails to maintain luminal patency.

The effect of angioplasty of single arteriovenous fistula-associated stenosis on arteriovenous fistula blood flow rate

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous balloon angioplasty of arteriovenous fistula-associated stenosis is performed for a variety of indications. Successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is expected to increase in arteriovenous fistula blood flow rate (Qa). A validated approach to predicting changes in Qa based upon stenosis characteristics is not available.

METHODS

Three baseline parameters were determined in a group of patients with a single arteriovenous fistula-associated stenosis undergoing PTA. These were percent estimated stenosis, stenosis minimum luminal diameter, and baseline Qa. The relationship between these parameters and changes in Qa following PTA was analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation and linear regression.

RESULTS

113 patients (total group) were studied. Of these,106 had peripheral stenosis (total peripheral subgroup) and 7 had central stenosis. For the total group and total peripheral subgroup, a highly significant inverse correlation was seen between changes in Qa and baseline Qa. A weaker correlation was seen between changes in Qa and minimum luminal diameter, but no correlation was seen with percent estimated stenosis. A minimum luminal diameter ⩽2.0 mm was predictive of ⩾300-mL/min increases in Qa, whereas a minimum luminal diameter >4.5 mm was associated with <300-mL/min increases in Qa. PTA of Central vein stenosis was not associated with significant changes in Qa.

CONCLUSION

Baseline Qa is the best predictor for change in Qa following PTA. Stenosis minimum luminal diameter cutoffs of ⩽2.0 and >4.5 mm are useful in predicting the magnitude of changes in Qa. Percent estimated stenosis is not predictive of change in Qa. PTA of central veins does not seem to change Qa.

Efficacy and safety of a mother-child technique for recanalization of chronic central venous occlusive disease in hemodialysis patients

OBJECTIVE

There is no optimal treatment for central vein occlusive disease that remains a major contributor to vascular access impairment. This study aimed to review the outcomes of percutaneous treatment with a mother-child technique in the treatment of symptomatic central venous stenosis (CVS) and central venous occlusion (CVO) in patients on hemodialysis.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively and included all consecutive patients with CVS or CVO who were treated with percutaneous angioplasty and stenting. The occlusive lesions were crossed using the mother-child technique with an angiographic catheter-in-guiding catheter system.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients with symptomatic CVS and 45 patients with total CVO were included. The average age and gender composition were similar between the two groups. Patients with CVO had higher prevalence of diabetic nephropathy than CVS (24.4% vs 5.6%; P < .05). Lesion success, device success, and procedural success were achieved in 36 (100%), 1 (100%), and 36 (100%) patients in the CVS group and in 43 (95.6%), 11 (100%), and 43 (95.6%) patients in the CVO group, respectively. There were no severe complications or procedure-related deaths in either group. During follow-up (median, 6 months), the primary patency rates were 89.7% (CVS) and 81.0% (CVO) at 6 months and were 54.2% (CVS) and 47.1% (CVO) at 12 months. The assisted primary patency rates were 100% (CVS) and 91.2% (CVO) at 6 and 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

With extra backup support of the mother-child technique, percutaneous treatment provides an effective and safe method for recanalization of chronic venous occlusion in patients on hemodialysis.

Angiography and phlebography in a hemodialysis population: A retrospective analysis of interventional results

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the reasons and beneficial effects and duration of arteriovenous fistula patency after radiological interventions in arteriovenous fistula. The patients investigated were referred due to arteriovenous fistula access flow problems.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 174 patients, 522 radiological investigations and endovascular treatments such as percutaneous transluminal angioplasty were analyzed, retrospectively. All investigations were performed due to clinical suspicion of impaired arteriovenous fistula function.

RESULTS

Arterial stenosis was significantly more frequent among patients with diabetic nephropathy (p < 0.001) and interstitial nephritis (p < 0.001). According to the venous stenosis, the diagnosis did not affect the frequency (p = 0.22) or the degree (p = 0.39) of stenosis. The degree of stenosis prior to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty correlated significantly with the degree of remaining stenosis after intervention (p < 0.001). Of the 174 patients, 123 (71%) performed a total of 318 investigations including percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Repeated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was performed significantly more often in patients with diabetic nephropathy. The median times to the first percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and to the subsequent percutaneous transluminal angioplasties were 9.5 and 5 months, respectively. Arteriovenous fistula in patients with diabetic nephropathy performed similar to most other diagnoses, although performing more percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/patient than most other diagnoses.

CONCLUSION

Many patients could maintain long-term patency of arteriovenous fistula, including those with diabetic nephropathy, with repeated interventions; this motivates a closer follow-up for these patients. Clinically significant stenosis should be dilated as meticulously and as soon as possible. Occlusions of the arteriovenous fistula in most instances can be successfully thrombolyzed or dilated upon early diagnosis.

Transposition of external jugular to proximal internal jugular vein for relief of venous thoracic outlet syndrome and maintenance of arteriovenous fistula access for chronic hemodialysis: A new approach

We are reporting a case of venous thoracic outlet syndrome with recurrent subclavian vein thrombosis in the setting of an ipsilateral brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis that was malfunctioning due to the central vein obstruction. The patient also had a concomitant external jugular vein origin stenosis. Given her body habitus and aversion to recovery after traditional first rib resection, we elected for an alternative treatment with an external jugular vein to internal jugular vein transposition with balloon angioplasty of the stenosed external jugular origin segment. The goal of this was to provide simultaneous relief of her outlet obstruction symptoms and salvage her dialysis access with a less invasive technique.

Radiological Central Vein Treatment in Vascular Access

In the last decades, the percutaneous interventional approach for the treatment of central venous obstructions (CVO) has become increasingly popular as the treatment of first choice because of its minimal invasiveness and reported success rates. CVOs are caused by a diverse spectrum of diseases which can be broadly categorized into two principal eliciting genera, either benign or malignant obstructions. The large group of benign venous obstructions includes the increasing number of end-stage renal disease patients with vascular access related complications. Due to the invasiveness and complexity of thoracic surgery for benign CVOs, the less invasive percutaneous interventional therapy can generally be considered the preferred treatment option. Initially, the radiological intervention consisted of balloon angioplasty alone, subsequently additional stent placement was applied. This was advocated as either primary placement or secondary in cases of elastic recoil or residual stenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). The efficacy of angioplasty of CVO in patients with vascular accesses, either with or without stenting, has been addressed by various studies. Overall, reports indicate an initial technical and clinical success rate above 95% and satisfactory patency rates. However, systematic follow-up and frequent re-interventions are necessary to maintain vascular patency to achieve long-term success.

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for central venous stenosis or occlusion in hemodialysis patients

The objectives of central venous percutaneous transluminal angioplasty are to dilate the venous lesion and to extend the life of arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis. It is reasonable to perform percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for central venous lesions if this interventional therapy is required to maintain stable dialysis therapy. However, the presence of large fresh thrombus at central venous lesion site represents a contraindication to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty unless the thrombus can first be removed by thrombectomy. Balloon angioplasty is a basic treatment for central venous lesion, but stent implantation is sometimes required. The self-expandable or balloon-expandable stent is chosen by the lesion location and characteristics. The lesion in subclavian vein is generally treated by self-expandable stent and right brachiocephalic vein is treated by balloon-expandable stent. The organic lesion of innominate vein with plaque is treated by self-expandable stent. Note that the innominate venous stenosis is sometimes caused by compression between the right brachiocephalic artery and the sternum, and this lesion is treated by balloon-expandable stent because the radial force of balloon-expandable stent is stronger than self-expandable stent. It is important to understand the indication and stent selection for central venous percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.

Impact of pre-operative venography on the planning and outcome of vascular access for hemodialysis patients

Objective

Pre-operative venous mapping has increased dramatically in most dialysis units since the Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative (DOQI) guidelines recommended a native arteriovenous venous fistula (AVF) rather than a graft for hemodialysis (HD) access procedures. However, there are conflicting consequences as a result of this policy. Some studies have showed that routine mapping has resulted in a marked increase in maturation rate while others have observed the reverse. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of pre-operative venography on the planning and outcome of AVF for our HD patients.

Patients and methods

A prospective study was performed on all patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who had HD access procedures and pre-operative venography between October 2003 and November 2005. Upper limb venography was done for all patients except those that required primary access and had visible veins. All patients had HD immediately after the venography. Access procedure selection was based on the result of the venography. The complications of venography, the surgical procedure and the outcome were recorded.

Results

One hundred and twenty-nine patients with ESRD who had pre-operative venography were included in this study. They were mostly middle age (mean age ± SD = 41 ± 15.5 yrs) with a high rate of diabetes mellitus (53%). No single complication was reported. A graft was placed in six patients (5%) only. Unsuccessful surgical exploration was 0%. Early failure was in 10 patients (8%).

Conclusion

Pre-operative venography resulted in an increase in the number of AVFs. It can improve the results of HD access procedures by selecting the most suitable veins.

Intra-operative central vein angioplasty during arteriovenous access creation

Central vein stenosis or occlusion due to prior use of central vein hemodialysis catheters may lead to disabling extremity edema or cause early failure after arteriovenous access construction. Our integrated program for arteriovenous access management enables us to identify these stenoses pre-operatively. We carried out intra-operative angiography and angioplasty during arteriovenous access creation in 3 patients with good immediate and long-term results. Intra-operative endovascular therapy is a new application of peripheral vascular surgery techniques for patients with significant central vein stenosis undergoing access surgery, which exploits the high postoperative flow state to maintain patency after angioplasty. It may also be applicable in situations such as proximal arterial stenosis with anticipated steal syndrome and other conditions that may compromise access patency.

Primary Stenting Is Not Necessary in Benign Central Venous Stenosis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate central venous stenosis (CVS) etiologies and presentation within a vascular surgery practice. We evaluated endovascular treatment modalities and the patency rates of our interventions.

METHODS

Five-year retrospective review of endovascular intervention for CVS. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and variables were collected including etiology, indwelling device, previous upper extremity (UE) deep venous thrombosis, long-term UE indwelling device (defined as >30 days), malignancy status, hypercoagulable disorders, history of radiation or mediastinal fibrosis or masses, and anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet therapy. Follow-up variables included symptoms, imaging, and anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet utilization. Living patients without recent follow-up were contacted with a telephone survey regarding current symptoms. Patency was evaluated by imaging or clinically by recurrence of signs or symptoms through January 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 61 patients underwent attempted endovascular CVS interventions from January 2007 to 2013. Forty-seven (83%) patients had successful interventions. There were 22 (36%) end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. The primary etiology in 79% of patients was benign CVS secondary to an indwelling device. Eighty-nine percent of the interventions were primary angioplasty (PTA). The overall primary patency rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 49%, 34%, and 24%, respectively. Secondary patency rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 97%, 93%, and 88%, respectively. There were no statistical differences in demographics or outcomes in patients treated successfully with PTA or those requiring stenting. There was no statistical difference in the patency rates between ESRD and non-ESRD patients. Previous interventions were not a predictor of loss of patency.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supported the rising trend of benign CVS predominantly secondary to indwelling devices. We demonstrated acceptable secondary patency with PTA alone. This study adds further support for a primary angioplasty strategy in treating benign CVS. The optimal endovascular treatment for benign CVS is still undefined.

Endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction as a complication of prolonged hemodialysis - Preliminary experience in a tertiary care center

Background:

Central venous disease is a serious complication in patients undergoing hemodialysis, often presenting with symptoms of venous hypertension. Treatment is aimed to provide symptomatic relief and to maintain hemodialysis access site patency.

Aim:

To describe our initial experience in the endovascular treatment of central venous stenosis or obstruction in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Settings and Design:

This was a retrospective study carried out in a tertiary care center. Study duration was 24 months. Follow-up was variable.

Materials and Methods:

Eleven patients of chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis presented with central vein stenosis or obstruction having ipsilateral vascular access, between July 2012 and July 2014. All the patients underwent endovascular treatment and were analyzed retrospectively.

Results and Conclusion:

A total of 11 patients (4 male and 7 female) underwent 18 interventions for 13 stenotic segments during a time period of 2 years. Eight stenotic segments were in brachiocephalic vein, three in subclavian vein, and two in axillary veins. The technical success rate for endovascular treatment was 81.8%. Two patients underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) alone and presented with restenosis later. Balloon angioplasty followed by stenting was done in seven patients, two of which required reintervention during follow-up. We found endovascular treatment safe and effective in treating central venous disease.

Wandering stent within the pulmonary circulation

To present a case of a wandering stent within the pulmonary circulation that was managed conservatively with the "wait-and-see" strategy. Accidental dislodgement of a left brachiocephalic vein stent into the left lower lobe pulmonary artery occurred in an 83-year-old patient suffering from end-stage renal disease during placement of a left jugular vein catheter. The following day, a second X-ray revealed migration of the stent from the left to the right lower lobe pulmonary artery. Our patient was managed conservatively with low-molecular-weight heparin and was discharged on clopidogrel. The patient remained asymptomatic with regard to the migrated stent for four and a half years and died of old age. This is the first case of a wandering stent within the pulmonary circulation reported in the literature, supporting the "wait-and-see" policy in the management of such patients.

Reported outcomes after the endovascular treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency

Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) has recently been implicated as a potential causal factor in the development of multiple sclerosis (MS). The treatment of jugular and azygous vein stenoses, characteristic of CCSVI, has been proposed as a potential component of therapy for MS. In the few short years since Dr. Paulo Zamboni published "A Prospective Open label Study of Endovascular Treatment of Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency", there has been tremendous patient-driven demand for treatment. Concurrently, there have been numerous publications since 2009 addressing CCSVI and its association with MS. The purpose of this article is to present a brief review of CCSVI and its association with MS and to review the available literature to date with a focus on outcomes data.

Central vein stenosis in an Asian hemodialysis population

Objective and background: Central vein stenosis occurs commonly after instrumentation of the major thoracic veins. We aimed to investigate factors that contributed to this condition in an Asian hemodialysis population, and the results of intervention.

Patients and methods: Hemodialysis patients diagnosed with central vein stenosis between January 2003 and December 2008, were identified from the records of the National University Hospital, Singapore. Eligible controls had a minimum of 2 years of hemodialysis via an arteriovenous fistula and/or central venous catheter, without clinical or radiological evidence of central vein stenosis.

Results: Central vein stenosis was diagnosed in 108 patients. The most common presenting features were arm swelling (32%) and failed hemodialysis catheter insertion (28%). The median frequency of permanent hemodialysis catheter insertion in those who subsequently developed venous stenosis (1.44 per patient per year) was 4 times that of controls (0.36 per patient per year; p < 0.001). Ischemic heart disease ( p = 0.03) and in certain patients, arteriovenous fistula surgery were associated with the development of central vein stenosis; whereas line sepsis, diabetes, and hypertension were not. Central vein angioplasty was attempted in 53 patients; the primary patency was 52% at 1 year.

Conclusion: Central vein stenosis is associated with a higher frequency of hemodialysis catheter insertion and access surgery. Efforts to decrease permanent hemodialysis catheter use should reduce the incidence of central vein stenosis.

Killing Two Birds with One Stone: Subclavian Vein Bypass Graft for Relief of Venous Obstruction and Haemodialysis Access

Subclavian and brachio-cephalic vein stenosis or occlusion occurs, most commonly, as an iatrogenic complication of the placement of central venous catheter. This occurrence can cause ipsilateral arm swelling in a newly-created arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Critical central vein stenoses are often successfully managed by endovascular approach; occasionally, complete occlusion with symptomatic severe arm swelling and pain that does not respond to angioplasty requires ligation of the dialysis access. We report successful surgical management of an end-stage-renal-failure (ESRF) patient with symptomatic subclavian vein occlusion refractory to angioplasty in an ipsilateral arm with an existing functional brachio-basilic transposition arteriovenous fistula by performing a basilic to internal jugular vein (IJV) bypass graft, relieving both the arm swelling and salvaging the existing vascular access for future haemodialysis.

Ipsilateral jugular to distal subclavian vein transposition to relieve central venous hypertension in rescue vascular access surgery: a surgical report of 3 cases

Central venous thrombosis may often arise following central venous cannulation for temporary haemodialysis access. Venous thrombosis may be clinically asymptomatic due to the presence of collateral circulation. However, if an arteriovenous (AV) fistula is prepared below the obstructed venous segment, then symptoms may occur. Central venous hypertension interferes with dialysis, compromises limb function and threatens its safety. Percutaneous treatment is mostly used. However, in some cases endovascular treatment may not be as easy and long term patency uncertain.We report our experience on 3 patients on chronic hemodialysis treatment presenting with a patent AV fistula and ipsilateral subclavian vein chronic fibrotic obstruction. They were treated by ipsilateral internal jugular to distal subclavian vein transposition. Two separate surgical incisions were performed to expose the subclavian vein distally to the occlusion and the jugular vein that was distally ligated and transposed. There was no mortality nor significant postoperative complications. Resolution of hypertensive symptoms was achieved within 3-4 weeks in all patients. The AV fistula was used for dialysis treatment starting from the first postoperative day. At follow-up (mean 13 months), there was no recurrence of upper limb venous hypertension.In patients with subclavian occlusion and ipsilateral low flow, patent AV fistula, jugular to distal subclavian vein transposition may prove useful in cases when percutaneous angioplasty is technically not feasible or long term patency is not expected.

Efficacy of covered stent placement for central venous occlusive disease in hemodialysis patients

OBJECTIVES

Covered stents have been proposed as an endovascular option for recalcitrant cases of hemodialysis-related central venous occlusive disease (CVOD). This study evaluated the efficacy and durability of covered stents in treating CVOD to preserve a functional dialysis access circuit.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all patients with clinically significant CVOD who were treated by placement of covered stents from April 2007 to September 2010. Demographics, lesion locations and anatomic characteristics, stent graft, and access patency rates were determined. Complications, reinterventions, and factors influencing their outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

In 25 patients (56% men; mean age, 57 ± 29 years) with CVOD, covered stents were used in 20 to treat symptomatic venous hypertension or in 5 at the time of access creation to enable functionality. The target lesion was accessed via the dialysis access site or the common femoral vein. The Viabahn endoprosthesis (W. L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) was used in 24 patients (average size and length, 11 mm × 5 cm) and a 13-mm × 5-cm Fluency covered stent (Bard Peripheral Vascular, Tempe, Ariz) was implanted in 1 patient. Technical success was 100%, and resolution of arm edema occurred after covered stent deployment in symptomatic patients. Two postprocedural cases (8%) of thrombosis occurred, one within 30 days and another at 3 months. Both required percutaneous thrombectomy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). Three additional patients (12%) required PTA due to restenosis in one of the ends of the device. Covered stent primary patency (PP), assisted primary patency (APP), and secondary patency (SP) were 56%, 86%, and 100% at 12 months, respectively. Access patency rates at 12 months were 29%, 85%, and 94% for PP, APP, and SP, respectively, in patients that received a covered stent for access salvage; patency rates were 74%, 85%, and 94% for PP, APP, and SP, respectively, in patients in whom the access was created after the venous outflow restoration.

CONCLUSIONS

Placement of covered stents for hemodialysis-related CVOD is safe, effective in relieving symptoms, and enabled functionality of new dialysis access circuits. Further prospective and randomized studies are necessary to determine whether covered stents provide superior long-term results to those achieved with PTA and bare metal stents.

Stent placement in hemodialysis access: historical lessons, the state of the art and future directions

Vascular access stenosis in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis is a major issue that is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and cost of medical care. Recent data have emphasized that endovascular stents could be used in the treatment of central as well as peripheral stenotic lesions. In general, a peripheral or central vein lesion that is elastic or recurs within a three-month period after an initially successful balloon angioplasty or a stenosis where surgical revision is not possible are some indications for intravascular stent placement. Recent reports have expanded the role of stents in the management of pseudoaneurysms associated with dialysis access. In this context, the utilization of these devices must take into account a fair comparison with the traditional (surgical) approaches regarding effectiveness as well as costs. This report describes the role of stents in arteriovenous dialysis access. In addition, some of the recent advances in the structure and complicating issues such as stent fracture, migration, and infection, as well cannulation through the stent, are discussed.

Percutaneous treatment of central venous stenosis in hemodialysis patients: long-term outcomes

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of endovascular treatment of central venous stenosis in patients with arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) for hemodialysis. Five hundred sixty-three patients with AVFs who were referred for a fistulogram were enrolled in this study. Among them, 44 patients showed stenosis (n = 35) or occlusions (n = 9) in the central vein. For the initial treatment, 26 patients underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and 15 patients underwent stent placements. Periods between AVF formation and first intervention ranged from 3 to 144 months. Each patient was followed for 14 to 60 months. Procedures were successful in 41 of 44 patients (93.2%). Primary patency rates for PTA at 12 and 36 months were 52.1% and 20.0%, and assisted primary patency rates were 77.8% and 33.3%, respectively. Primary patency rates for stent at 12 and 36 months were 46.7% and 6.7%, and assisted primary patency rates were 60.0% and 20.0%, respectively. Fifteen of 26 patients with PTAs underwent repeated interventions because of restenosis. Fourteen of 15 patients with a stent underwent repeated interventions because of restenosis and combined migration (n = 1) and shortening (n = 6) of the first stent. There was no significant difference in patency between PTAs and stent placement (p > 0.05). Average AVF patency duration was 61.8 months and average number of endovascular treatments was 2.12. In conclusion, endovascular treatments of central venous stenosis could lengthen the available period of AVFs. There was no significant difference in patency between PTAs and stent placement.

Use of nitinol stents following recanalization of central venous occlusions in hemodialysis patients

PURPOSE

To retrospectively review the patency of endovascular interventions with nitinol stent placement for symptomatic central venous occlusions in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent endovascular interventions for dysfunctional hemodialysis grafts and fistulas was performed from April 2004 to August 2006. A total of 6 patients presented with arm and/or neck and facial swelling and left brachiocephalic vein occlusion. The study group consisted of 3 men and 3 women with a mean age of 79.5 years (SD 11.2 years). Of these 6 patients, 1 had a graft and 5 had fistulas in the left arm. The primary indication for nitinol stent placement was technical failure of angioplasty following successful traversal of occluded central venous segments. Patency was assessed from repeat fistulograms and central venograms performed when patients redeveloped symptoms or were referred for access dysfunction determined by the ultrasound dilution technique. No patients were lost to follow-up.

RESULTS

Nitinol stent placement to obtain technically successful recanalization of occluded venous segments was initially successful in 5 of 6 patients (83%). In 1 patient, incorrect stent positioning resulted in partial migration to the superior vena cava requiring restenting to prevent further migration. Clinical success was observed in all patients (100%). Over the follow-up period, 2 patients underwent repeat intervention with angioplasty alone. Primary patency was 83.3% (95% CI 0.5-1.2) at 3 months, and 66.7% at 6 and 12 months (0.2-1.1, 0.1-1.2). Secondary patency was 100% at 12 months with 3 patients censored over that time period. Mean primary patency was 10.4 months with a mean follow-up of 12.4 months. No complications related to recanalization of the occluded central venous segments were observed.

CONCLUSION

Our initial experience has demonstrated that use of nitinol stents for central venous occlusion in hemodialysis patients is associated with good mid-term patency and may exceed historical observations with prior use of Wallstents.

Percutaneous stenting of bilateral central venous occlusions in a hemodialysis patient

Upper-extremity central venous obstruction is often first recognized when an arteriovenous fistula is made for hemodialysis at an ipsilateral site. We encountered a case of markedly expanded edema after making an arteriovenous fistula in the left forearm. Systemic venography showed that the bilateral brachiocephalic veins and right subclavian vein were occluded. Implantation of a self-expandable stent in the left brachiocephalic vein relieved the edema. However, recurrence of similar edema and occlusion of the left brachiocephalic vein were noted after 1.5 years. The left brachiocephalic vein was then recanalized by ballooning and additional stent implantation, and a stent was implanted between the superior vena cava and right subclavian vein. Simultaneous reconstruction of the bilateral central venous obstruction by percutaneous intervention rather than surgical repair was suitable for this patient because of previous thoracoplasty. We also believe that this method can provide an opportunity to select the suitable forearm for making an arteriovenous fistula, in which the ipsilateral central vein will exhibit little restenosis.

Treatment of refractory central vein stenosis in hemodialysis patients with stents

Central venous stenosis is a frequent complication in hemodialysis patients, which can manifest clinically with ipsilateral upper extremity edema. When symptomatic, it is usually treated by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. When angioplasty is unsuccessful, stent deployment is a therapeutic option. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the primary and secondary patency of refractory central vein stenosis after treatment with a stent. Using a prospective vascular access database we retrospectively identified 23 patients presenting with unilateral upper extremity edema and a significant (> 50%) central vein stenosis, who underwent stent placement due to refractory stenosis following angioplasty. The primary (unassisted) central vein patency was determined from the initial intervention to the next angioplasty for recurrent central vein stenosis, and the secondary (assisted) patency from the initial intervention to permanent central vein occlusion. An immediate technical success was achieved in all patients after the stent deployment. However, the median primary central vein patency was only 138 days, with a 19% patency at 1 year. Recurrence of ipsilateral edema was always due to in-stent restenosis. The median secondary central vein patency was 1036 days, with a 64% patency at 1 year. In patients with symptomatic central vein stenosis that is refractory to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, stent deployment provides short-term relief of the stenosis and ipsilateral upper extremity edema. However, long-term symptomatic relief can be achieved with multiple subsequent interventions in many patients.

Patency of Endovascular Treatment for Central Venous Stenosis: Is There a Difference Between Dialysis Fistulas and Grafts?

PURPOSE

To determine if there is a difference in intervention patency for central venous stenosis (CVS) and occlusion between patients with autogenous hemodialysis fistulas and those with grafts.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed from March 1998 to September 2005 identifying all patients with autogenous fistulas and synthetic grafts who underwent percutaneous angioplasty and/or stent placement for CVS. This study cohort consisted of 38 patients (22 with fistulas and 16 with grafts). Age, sex, type of access, location and side of the access, location and side of the CVS, presence of diabetes, previous hemodialysis catheter placement, date and type of interventions, and outcomes were recorded. The patency of each intervention was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Univariate and multivariate analysis of the variables were performed.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine interventions were performed; 83 were angioplasties and six were stent placements. Previous catheter placement on the side of the CVS occurred in 29 of the 38 patients (76%). Technical and clinical success of the interventions were 93.3% and 94.4% respectively. The intervention or primary patency rates +/- standard errors at 3, 6, and 9 months in the fistula group were 88.5% +/- 4.8, 59.4% +/- 7.6, and 46% +/- 7.9, respectively. In the graft group, the rates were 78.1% +/- 7.3, 40.7% +/- 9, and 16% +/- 7.3, respectively. With multivariate analysis, intervention patency remained significantly longer for fistulas (P .014) and in patients who did not have a previous catheter (P .001).

CONCLUSION

Longer intervention-free survival for CVS was observed in patients with autogenous fistulas compared with grafts and in patients who did not previously undergo hemodialysis catheter insertion.

Effect of Secondary Interventions on Patency of Vascular Access Sites for Hemodialysis

PURPOSE

To determine the impact of secondary procedures performed to maintain arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and arteriovenous graft (AVG) patency.

METHODS

There hundred and eighty six vascular access procedures were retrospectively evaluated. 156 (40.4%) patients required radiological interventions to treat acute thrombosis, swelling of the extremity with the access site, insufficient hemodialysis, or stenosis at an anastomotic site.

RESULTS

The 386 cases comprised 106 AVGs and 280 AVFs. In 138 of the 156 cases, which required a radiological intervention, the treatment was successful and saved the vascular access site. The unassisted post-intervention patency time for these 138 successful cases was 13.1 +/- 12 months (range, 1-65 months). Twenty-nine (63%) of the 46 access sites treated with surgical thrombectomy were saved.

CONCLUSIONS

Frequent, regular follow-up of hemodialysis patients with vascular access sites is the best way to diagnose problems early and allow the best chance of long-term function.

In Preparation for a Treatment Guideline for Suitable Vascular Access Repair in Japan

In cases of vascular access (VA) for hemodialysis including arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous graft, venipuncture and hemostasis are usually repeated three times a week. Accordingly, it is assumed that VA vascular disorders are worsened following long-term hemodialysis. In particular, angiostenosis frequently occurs and results in insufficient blood flow or increased venous pressure. Additionally, stenosis is a major cause of VA occlusion. While VA intervention treatment is mainstream for VA stenosis, its major advantage lies in its less invasiveness because it is a percutaneous treatment. A further advantage of this treatment procedure is that the existing VA can be preserved intact. For practical use of VA intervention treatment, however, compliance with the therapeutic indication guideline is required. In K/DOQI of the United States, such a guideline has already been formulated based on evidence and specialist opinion, while the guideline of the European Vascular Access Society is presented in the form of a flowchart. The Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy is currently preparing a guideline for the construction and maintenance of VA, which introduces the timing and principles of repair of VA in the following six categories: (i) stenosis; (ii) occlusion; (iii) venous hypertension; (iv) steal syndrome; (v) excess blood flow; and (vi) infection. Except for infection, most of the treatments for these events involve VA intervention, thus the need for the guideline for VA intervention treatment is becoming widely recognized.

Inflow stenoses in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulae and grafts

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study is to prospectively determine the incidence of inflow stenoses in dysfunctional hemodialysis access arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) and grafts (AVGs).

METHODS

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) was performed of 66 dysfunctional AVFs and 35 AVGs in 56 men and 45 women (mean age, 62 years; age range, 31 to 86 years). Complete inflow (from the subclavian artery), shunt region, and complete outflow (including subclavian vein) were shown at CE-MRA. In addition to standard digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of the shunt region and outflow, DSA of the complete inflow was obtained through access catheterization of all cases in which CE-MRA showed an inflow stenosis. Vascular stenosis is defined as greater than 50% decrease in luminal diameter compared with an uninvolved vascular segment located adjacent to the stenosis. Endovascular intervention of stenoses was performed in connection with DSA.

RESULTS

CE-MRA showed 19 arterial stenoses in 14 patients (14%). DSA confirmed 18 of these lesions in 13 patients and showed no additional inflow lesions. Of the 13 patients, 7 patients had arterial stenoses only and 6 patients had accompanying stenoses in the shunt region and/or outflow. Referral criteria for the 13 patients to undergo access evaluation had been decreased flow rates (9 patients), steal symptoms (2 patients), and insufficient access maturation (2 patients). Access flow of the 9 patients with a low-flow access improved from 477 +/- 74 mL/min to 825 +/- 199 mL/min after angioplasty. One patient with steal symptoms became symptom free after angioplasty. Endovascular intervention in 3 patients proved to be unsuccessful.

CONCLUSION

Inflow stenoses are not uncommon in dysfunctional hemodialysis access shunts. We suggest that radiological evaluation comprise assessment of the complete arterial inflow.

Radiological Intervention to Maintain Vascular Access

Stenoses and thromboses of dialysis grafts and fistulae are common problems in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). Timely recognition and treatment of access-related complications are essential to achieve long-term access function. Minimally invasive percutaneous interventions are techniques of growing importance for the interventional community. While stenoses can typically be treated by balloon angioplasty (PTA), thrombotic lesions may necessitate the combination of mechanical devices and/or thrombolytic agents with ancillary PTA. In this article, interventional treatments for the failing arteriovenous (AV) access are presented and reviewed.

Central vein obstruction in vascular access

Central venous obstruction has become a major problem because of the frequent need for central venous catheters in haemodialysis patients. This article discusses the epidemiology and clinical features of central venous obstruction and the different surgical and interventional alternatives for its treatment.