1
|
Abisi S, Zayed H, Frigatti P, Furlan F, Simonte G, Isernia G, Kuczmik W, Fattoum M, Halak M, Silverberg D, Gkoutzios P, Saha P. Medium-term outcomes of EXTra-design engineering inner-branch ENdografts for the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms from a multicenter collaboration. J Vasc Surg 2024; 80:336-343. [PMID: 38467204 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to present the medium-term outcomes of Extra-Design engineering endografts with inner branches (EDE-iBEVARs, Artivion) in endovascular aortic repairs of complex aneurysms building upon promising early results. METHODS A retrospective, international, multi-center study was conducted including consecutive patients who underwent complex endovascular aortic repairs using EDE-iBEVARs between 2018 and 2022. Patient demographics, aneurysm anatomical features, procedural details, reinterventions, complications, and endograft failures during follow-up were assessed. The primary outcome was aneurysm-related mortality. Secondary outcome measures included the freedom from all-cause mortality and reintervention, technical and clinical success, and late related complications including branch instability, endoleaks, and serious adverse events. RESULTS Our study encompassed a total of 260 patients across 13 European centers. The cohort included patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (n = 116), suprarenal or juxta-renal aneurysms (n = 95), and those who had previous open repair or previous endovascular aortic repair with type 1A endoleak (n = 49). Of 982 possible inner branches (937 antegrade and 45 retrograde), 962 (98%) were successfully cannulated and bridged with covered stents during the index procedure. Overall, the endograft was successfully deployed in 98% of patients, and 93% were discharged from hospital following surgery. At 3 years, freedom from aneurysm-related mortality was 97%, whereas the freedom of all-cause mortality was 89%. Freedom from reinterventions was 91% and 76% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. The rate of late complications such as endoleaks or branch instability events was 12% (n = 30). The late branch occlusion rate during follow-up was 1.5% (n = 15), of which 12 were renal branches. CONCLUSIONS EDE-iBEVARs demonstrate satisfactory medium-term outcomes with reintervention rates comparable to other endografts. Encouragingly, rates of branch patency were high, and major adverse events were low. This technology could expand the treatment options for patients with challenging complex aortic conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Said Abisi
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Hany Zayed
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Panos Gkoutzios
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Prakash Saha
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Santos-Venâncio M, Rocha-Neves J, Spath P, Oliveira-Pinto J. Complications and Technical Success on Upper Limb Vascular Access for Endovascular Repair of Complex Abdominal and Thoraco-abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 109:433-443. [PMID: 39059630 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Revised: 06/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Catheterization of target vessels (TV) represented by renal visceral vessels are the crucial aspect during fenestrated and branched endovascular repair. This study aims to assess the efficacy and complications associated with upper limb catheterization during complex aneurysm endovascular surgery repair. METHODS A systematic review was conducted after Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, involving a search across PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Primary endpoint was represented by 30-day stroke. Secondary endpoints were target vessels' (TVs) technical success, 30-day mortality, and local access-related complications. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS Sixteen observational studies encompassing 4,137 patients were included. The 30-day stroke incidence for upper limb access was 1.4% (95% CI 1.0-1.8%), which was slightly higher than lower limb, despite not statistically significant. Mortality varied between 0 and 6.8%, and local access-related complications occurred in 3.2% (95% CI 1.9-4.4%). Technical success in TV catheterization was 99.2% (95% CI 98.4-100.0%). CONCLUSIONS This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate the safety and efficacy of upper limb access for Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair (f/b-EVAR), with low stroke risk, mortality rates, and minimal local complications. Despite the risk of bias, the findings suggest that upper limb access may be beneficial, especially in bailout situations when femoral access fails, offering valuable insights for clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - João Rocha-Neves
- Department of Biomedicine - Unit of Anatomy, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal; RISE@Health, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Paolo Spath
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital "Infermi" Rimini, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy; Vascular Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen, Vascular Surgery Marchionisteße Munchen, Bayern, Germany
| | - José Oliveira-Pinto
- RISE@Health, Porto, Portugal; Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Goyal A, Fatima L, Jain H, Tariq MD, Mushtaq F, Suheb MZK, Lu E, Khan R, Sohail AH. Comparison of Outcomes Between Right and Left Upper Extremity Access in Endovascular Aortic Repair for Patients with Thoracoabdominal and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cardiol Rev 2024:00045415-990000000-00278. [PMID: 38814082 DOI: 10.1097/crd.0000000000000734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Traditionally, left-sided upper extremity (LUE) access has been preferred in patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) to manage aortic aneurysms and decrease the risk of cerebrovascular adverse events. Recently, right-sided upper extremity access (RUE) has gained popularity owing to its greater maneuverability and ergonomics. However, synthesized data comparing the safety and efficacy of RUE and LUE accesses are limited. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on various databases from inception to September 2023 to retrieve all studies that compared RUE and LUE access in EVAR. Data on stroke, 30-day mortality, technical success, access-site complications, total time required for fluoroscopy, and contrast agent requirement were extracted, pooled, and analyzed. Forest plots were generated using a random-effects model on review manager by pooling the risk ratios (RRs) and standard mean differences (SMDs). Ten observational studies with a total of 3994 patients were included in our analysis with 1186 patients in the RUE and 2808 patients in the LUE access groups. EVAR using RUE access was associated with a significantly lower amount of contrast agent requirement than the LUE access group [SMD, -0.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.45 to -0.02; P = 0.03]. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of the risk of stroke (RR, 1.62; 95% CI, 0.81-3.22; P = 0.17), 30-day mortality (RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.50-4.06; P = 0.51), rate of technical success (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.95-1.01; P = 0.18), risk of access-site complications (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.72-1.39; P = 0.99), and total time required for fluoroscopy (SMD, 0.07; 95% CI, -0.39 to 0.26; P = 0.69). The use of RUE access in EVAR appears to be comparable to LUE access in terms of the risk of stroke, access-related complications, all-cause mortality, technical success rate, and fluoroscopy duration. The RUE group required a lower volume of contrast agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aman Goyal
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Laveeza Fatima
- Department of Internal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Hritvik Jain
- Department of Internal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Muhammad Daoud Tariq
- Department of Internal Medicine, Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Fiza Mushtaq
- Department of Internal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan
| | | | - Eileen Lu
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Rozi Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Amir Humza Sohail
- Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico Health Sciences, Albuquerque, NM
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Goyal A, Fatima L, Mushtaq F, Tariq MD, Kamran A, Sohail AH, Chunawala Z, Sulaiman SA, Shrestha AB, Sheikh AB, Belur AD. Comparison between the outcomes of transfemoral access and transfemoral access with adjunct upper extremity access in patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair: A pilot systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2024; 103:982-994. [PMID: 38584518 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.31048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
Endovascular aortic repair is an emerging novel intervention for the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. It is crucial to compare the effectiveness of different access sites, such as transfemoral access (TFA) and upper extremity access (UEA). An electronic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases. The primary endpoint was the incidence of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), while the secondary endpoints included technical success, access-site complications, mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), spinal cord ischemia, among others. Forest plots were constructed for the pooled analysis of data using the random-effects model in Review Manager, version 5.4. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Our findings in 9403 study participants (6228 in the TFA group and 3175 in the UEA group) indicate that TFA is associated with a lower risk of stroke/TIA [RR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.40-0.75; p = 0.0002], MI [RR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.38-0.69; p < 0.0001], spinal cord ischemia [RR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.32-0.53, p < 0.00001], and shortens fluoroscopy time [SMD: -0.62; 95% CI: -1.00 to -0.24; p = 0.001]. Moreover, TFA required less contrast agent [SMD: -0.33; 95% CI: -0.61 to -0.06; p = 0.02], contributing to its appeal. However, no significant differences emerged in technical success [p = 0.23], 30-day mortality [p = 0.48], ICU stay duration [p = 0.09], or overall hospital stay length [p = 0.22]. Patients with TFA had a lower risk of stroke, MI, and spinal cord ischemia, shorter fluoroscopy time, and lower use of contrast agents. Future large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm and strengthen these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aman Goyal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Laveeza Fatima
- Department of Internal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Fiza Mushtaq
- Department of Internal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Daoud Tariq
- Department of Internal Medicine, Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Aemen Kamran
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Amir Humza Sohail
- Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico Health Sciences, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Zainali Chunawala
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Samia Aziz Sulaiman
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | | | - Abu Baker Sheikh
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Agastya D Belur
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Al Adas Z, Uceda D, Mazur A, Zehner K, Agrusa CJ, Wang G, Schneider DB. Safety and learning curve of percutaneous axillary artery access for complex endovascular aortic procedures. J Vasc Surg 2024; 79:487-496. [PMID: 37918698 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.10.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous axillary artery access is increasingly used for large-bore access during interventional vascular and cardiac procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and learning curve of percutaneous axillary artery access in patients undergoing complex endovascular aortic repair (fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair [FBEVAR]) requiring large-bore upper extremity access and to discuss best practices for technique and complication management. METHODS One-hundred forty-six patients undergoing large-bore percutaneous axillary artery access during FBEVAR in a prospective, nonrandomized, Investigational Device Exemption study between September 2017 and January 2023 were analyzed. Ultrasound guidance and micropuncture were used to access the second portion of the axillary artery and 2 Perclose Proglide or Prostyle devices (Abbott Vascular) were predeployed before the insertion of the large-bore sheath. Completion angiography was performed in all patients to verify hemostatic closure. Axillary artery patency was also assessed on follow-up computed tomography angiography. Patient-related, procedural, and postoperative variables were collected and analyzed. RESULTS One-hundred forty-five patients underwent successful percutaneous axillary artery access; 1 patient failed axillary access and alternative access was established. The left axillary artery was accessed in 115 patients (79%), and the right axillary artery was accessed in 30 patients (21%). The largest profile sheath was 14 F in 4 patients (2.8%), 12F in 133 patients (91.7%), and 8F in 8 patients (5.5%). Ten patients (6.9%) required covered stent placement (Viabahn, W. L. Gore & Associates) for failure to achieve hemostasis; there were no conversions to open surgical repair. Additional adverse events included transient upper extremity weakness in two patients (1.3%) and transient upper extremity paresthesias in two patients (1.3%). Three patients (2%) suffered postoperative strokes, including one unrelated hemorrhagic stroke and two possibly access-related embolic strokes. On follow-up, axillary artery patency was 100%. There was a trend toward decreased closure failure over time, with seven patients (10%) in the early cohort and three (4%) in the late cohort. There was a significant negative correlation between the cumulative complication rate and the cumulative experience. CONCLUSIONS Large-bore percutaneous axillary artery access provides safe upper extremity large-bore access during FBEVAR, achieving successful closure in >90% of patients with a low incidence of access-related complications. There was a trend toward better closure rates with increasing experience, suggesting a learning curve effect. Application of best practices including ultrasound guidance and angiography may ensure safe application of the technique of percutaneous large-bore axillary artery access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziad Al Adas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Domingo Uceda
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alexa Mazur
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kiera Zehner
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christopher J Agrusa
- Division of Vascular Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill, Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Grace Wang
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Darren B Schneider
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nana P, Koelemay MJW, Leone N, Brodis A, van den Berg JC, de Bruin JL, Geelkerken RH, Spanos K. A Systematic Review of Endovascular Repair Outcomes in Atherosclerotic Chronic Mesenteric Ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 66:632-643. [PMID: 37451604 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Chronic mesenteric ischaemia (CMI) treatment focuses on symptom relief and prevention of disease progression. Endovascular repair represents the main treatment modality, while data on the associated antiplatelet regimen are scarce. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the early and midterm outcomes of endovascular repair in patients with CMI. DATA SOURCES Randomised controlled trials and observational studies (1990 - 2022) reporting on early and midterm endovascular repair outcomes in patients with atherosclerotic CMI. REVIEW METHODS The PRISMA guidelines and PICO model were followed. The protocol was registered to PROSPERO (CRD42023401685). Medline, Embase (via Ovid), and Cochrane databases were searched (end date 21 February 2023). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for risk of bias assessment, and GRADE for evidence quality assessment. Primary outcomes were technical success, 30 day mortality, and symptom relief, assessed using prevalence meta-analysis. The role of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was investigated using meta-regression analysis. RESULTS Sixteen retrospective studies (1 224 patients; mean age 69.8 ± 10.6 years; 60.3% female) reporting on 1 368 target vessels (57.8% superior mesenteric arteries) were included. Technical success was 95.0% (95% CI 93 - 97%, p = .28, I2 19%, low certainty), the 30 day mortality rate was 2.0% (95% CI 2 - 4%, p = .93, I2 36%, low certainty), and immediate symptom relief was 87.0% (95% CI 80 - 92%, p < .010, I2 85%, very low certainty). At mean follow up of 28 months, the mortality rate was 15.0% (95% CI 9 - 25%, p = .010, I2 86%, very low certainty), symptom recurrence 25.0% (95% CI 21 - 31%, p < .010, I2 68%, very low certainty) and re-intervention rate 26.0% (95% CI 17 - 37%, p < .010, I2 92%, very low certainty). Single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) and DAPT performed similarly in the investigated outcomes. CONCLUSION Endovascular repair for CMI appears to be safe as first line treatment, with a low peri-operative mortality rate and acceptable immediate symptom relief. During midterm follow up, symptom recurrence and need for re-intervention are not uncommon. SAPT appears to be equal to DAPT in post-operative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- Vascular Surgery Department, University Hospital of Larissa, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
| | - Mark J W Koelemay
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicola Leone
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Alexandros Brodis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Jos C van den Berg
- Centro Vascolare Ticino, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, sede Civico, Lugano and Universitätsinstitut für Diagnostische, Interventionelle und Pädiatrische Radiologie Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jorg L de Bruin
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert H Geelkerken
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Gastrointestinal Ischaemia, Enschede, the Netherlands; Multi-Modality Medical Imaging group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- Vascular Surgery Department, University Hospital of Larissa, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Patel RJ, Sibona A, Malas MB, Lane JS, Al-Nouri O, Barleben AR. Upper Extremity Access Has Worse Outcomes in F/BEVAR Using the VQI Dataset. Ann Vasc Surg 2023; 97:184-191. [PMID: 37574045 PMCID: PMC10841218 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physician-modified endografts and custom-manufactured devices use branched and fenestrated techniques (F/BEVAR) to repair complex aneurysms. Traditionally, many of these are deployed through a combination of upper and lower extremity access. However, with newer steerable sheaths, you can now simulate upper extremity (UEM) access from a transfemoral approach. Single-institution studies have demonstrated increased risks of access site complications and stroke when UEM access is used. This study compares outcomes after F/BEVAR in a national database between total transfemoral (TTF) access and mixed UEM access. METHODS This study is an analysis of the Vascular Quality Initiative for all patients who underwent F/BEVAR from 2014 to 2021. Patients were stratified based on a TTF delivery of all devices versus any UEM access for deployment of target vessel stents. Primary outcomes included stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and perioperative death. Secondary outcomes included access site hematoma, occlusion or embolization, operative time, fluoroscopy time, and technical success. Multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS Three thousand one hundred forty six patients underwent an F/BEVAR: 2,309 (73.4%) TTF and 837 (26.6%) UEM. Logistic regression analysis indicated a two-fold increased risk of death and MI and a three-fold increased risk of stroke in the UEM group. Furthermore, there is decreased operative time (221 vs. 297 min, P < 0.001) and fluoroscopy time (62 vs. 80 min, P < 0.001) in the TTF group and no difference in technical success between groups (96% vs. 97%, P = 0.159). Finally, there was a decrease in access site hematoma 2.54% vs. 4.31% (P = 0.013), access site occlusion 0.61% vs. 1.91% (P = 0.001), and extremity embolization 2.17% vs. 3.58% (P = 0.026) in the TTF versus UEM group. CONCLUSIONS This study using Vascular Quality Initiative data demonstrates that patients who undergo an F/BEVAR using UEM access have an increased risk of perioperative MI, death, and stroke compared to TTF access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohini J Patel
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Agustin Sibona
- Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - John S Lane
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Omar Al-Nouri
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Andrew R Barleben
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Torrealba J, Grandi A, Nana P, Panuccio G, Rohlffs F, Kölbel T. Transfemoral Access to Implant Iliac Branch Devices After Previous Aortic Grafts. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231208657. [PMID: 37902437 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231208657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report on the outcomes of patients undergoing an iliac branch device implantation after previous open or endovascular aorto-biliac repair, using exclusively femoral access for catheterization and delivery of the covering stent to the hypogastric artery. METHODS Single-center retrospective study in which all patients in whom an iliac branch device was implanted after previous open or endovascular aorto-biliac repair were identified. Patients in whom the hypogastric artery catheterization and delivery of the bridging cover stent were achieved via exclusive femoral access were included. Different techniques were used based on surgeon preference. Technical success and access-related complications, as well as iliac branch device endoleak or occlusions during follow-up, were evaluated. RESULTS From 2015 to 2021, 28 patients with a prior open or endovascular aorto-biliac repair underwent 34 iliac branch device implantations. Most (71%) had juxtarenal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, 82% had common iliac artery aneurysms, and 25% had hypogastric artery aneurysms. Bilateral iliac branch device implantations were performed in 21% of the patients, and in 26% of cases, landing in the superior gluteal artery was obtained. An "up-and-over" technique from the contralateral groin was used in 65% of the cases, and a steerable sheath in 35%. Technical success was 94%, with no complications related to access or technique to catheterize and deliver the stents in the hypogastric artery. The cohort had 20% of major complications, with 3 perioperative deaths. Kaplan-Meier estimated an iliac branch device freedom from occlusion and endoleak was 92% and 83% at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS The implantation of an iliac branch device over previous aortic or open endografts involving the aortic bifurcation is feasible and safe. We suggest using a femoral approach as the primary access of choice. CLINICAL IMPACT In this study we present 28 patients with previous aortoiliac grafts in which iliac branch devices were performed as a subsequent step.We demonstrated the feasibility of the technique despite the difficulty of crossing a neobifurcation, with a steep angle, without complications associated with the technique. Based on our experience, we recommend transfemoral access as the first option for bypassing the hypogastric artery stent, preserving upper extremity access and its possible complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Torrealba
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alessandro Grandi
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Petroula Nana
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nana P, Houérou TL, Guihaire J, Gaudin A, Fabre D, Haulon S. Early Outcomes on Triple-Branch Arch Device With Retrograde Left Common Carotid Branch: A Case Series. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231195758. [PMID: 37635649 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231195758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endovascular aortic arch repair using multibranch devices has been applied in patients considered at high risk for open repair. The aim of this case series was to report the early outcomes in patients managed with a new design 3 branch arch custom-made device, including a retrograde left common carotid artery (LCCA) branch. METHODS The Preferred Reporting Of CaSe Series in Surgery (PROCESS) guidelines were followed. All consecutive patients undergoing endovascular repair of an aortic arch lesion with a custom-made triple-branch device, including a retrograde LCCA branch (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA), between October 27, 2022, and February 28, 2023, were included. The presence of an arch aneurysm (degenerative or post-dissection) with diameter ≥55 mm and high risk for a conventional open repair set the indication for treatment. The primary outcomes were technical success and mortality at 30 days. Early morbidity and reinterventions were considered as secondary outcomes. RESULTS Eight elective patients (87.5% men, mean age 72.3±27.0 years) were included. Five of them (62.5%) had undergone a previous ascending aorta repair of an acute type A aortic dissection. All patients were asymptomatic, except one, with left recurrent laryngeal nerve compression. The mean maximum aortic diameter was 70.4±21.0 mm. Percutaneous femoral and axillary access was used in all cases except three in which a cut down for right carotid access was performed. Technical success was 100%. Femoral access to the LCCA and implantation of the bridging stent was performed without technical challenges. No death nor cerebrovascular event was recorded during the 30 day follow-up. Five patients (62.5%) presented major complications, 3 related to access needing reintervention and the remaining related to congestive heart failure (CHF), which were managed successfully with medical treatment. Follow-up (range 1-4 month) was uneventful, except for one patient who presented a secondary type Ia endoleak. CONCLUSIONS According to our early experience, the presence of a retrograde branch facilitated the revascularization of the LCCA through femoral access, decreasing the risk of cerebrovascular morbidity. Further analyses with longer follow-up are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the device. CLINICAL IMPACT Data arising mainly from the retrograde branch for the revascularization of the LSA are encouraging from a variety of devices. The premiminary experience with a triple-branched arch device, with a retrograde branche for the LSA but also for the LCCA, was associated with no 30 day mortality and 100% technical success.The device's design allowed swift catheterization and completion of the LCCA revascularization using femoral access exclusively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- Aortic Center, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Le Houérou
- Aortic Center, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Julien Guihaire
- Aortic Center, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Antoine Gaudin
- Aortic Center, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Fabre
- Aortic Center, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Stéphan Haulon
- Aortic Center, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mario D, Alessandro G, Giovanni P, Gianbattista P, Rocco G, Mauro G, Nicola M, Roberto C, Sandro L, Luca B. Total Transfemoral Branched Endovascular Thoracoabdominal Aortic Repair (TORCH2): Short-term and 1-Year Outcomes From a National Multicenter Registry. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231179864. [PMID: 37326371 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231179864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The use of steerable sheaths to allow total transfemoral access (TFA) of branched endovascular repair (BEVAR) of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms has been proposed as an alternative to upper extremity access (UEA); however, multicenter results from high-volume aortic centers are lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Total Transfemoral Branched Endovascular Thoracoabdominal Aortic Repair (TORCH2) study is a physician-initiated, national, multicenter, retrospective, observational registry (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04930172) of patients undergoing BEVAR with a TFA for the cannulation of reno-visceral target vessels (TV). The study endpoints, classified according to Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards, were (1) technical success; (2) 30-day peri-operative major adverse events; (3) 30-day and midterm clinical success; (4) 30-day and midterm branch instability and TV-related adverse events (reinterventions, type I/III endoleaks). RESULTS Sixty-eight patients (42 males; median age: 72 years) were treated through a TFA. All the centers included their entire experience with TFA: 18 (26%) used a homemade steerable sheath, and in 28 cases (41%), a stabilizing guidewire was employed. Steerable technical success was achieved in 66 patients (97%) with an overall in-hospital mortality of 6 patients (9%, 3 elective cases [3/58, 5%] and 3 urgent/emergent cases [3/12, 25%]) and major adverse event rate of 18% (12 patients). Overall, 257 bridging stents were implanted; of these, 225 (88%) were balloon-expandable and 32 (12%) were self-expanding. No strokes were observed among the patient completing the procedure from a TFA. One patient (2%) who failed to be treated completely from a TFA and needed a bailout UEA suffered an ischemic stroke on postoperative day 2. There were 10 (15%) major access-site complications. At 1-year follow-up, overall survival was 80%, and the rate of branch instability was 6%. CONCLUSIONS A TFA for TV cannulation is a safe and feasible option with high technical success preventing the stroke risk of UEA. Primary patency at midterm seems comparable to historical controls, and future larger studies will be needed to assess potential differences with alternative options. CLINICAL IMPACT Using a transfemoral approach for retrograde cannulation of reno-visceral branches is feasiable, safe and effective, thereby representing a reliable alternative for BEVAR interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D'Oria Mario
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste ASUGI, Trieste, Italy
| | - Grandi Alessandro
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pratesi Giovanni
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Parlani Gianbattista
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Giudice Rocco
- UOC di Chirurgia Vascolare, Dipartimento Cardiovascolare, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni-Addolorata, Rome, Italy
| | - Gargiulo Mauro
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), S. Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mangialardi Nicola
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ospedale San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiesa Roberto
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, "Vita-Salute" San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Lepidi Sandro
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste ASUGI, Trieste, Italy
| | - Bertoglio Luca
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, "Vita-Salute" San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical and Clinical Sciences, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bertoglio L, Oderich G, Melloni A, Gargiulo M, Kölbel T, Adam DJ, Di Marzo L, Piffaretti G, Agrusa CJ, Van den Eynde W. Multicentre International Registry of Open Surgical Versus Percutaneous Upper Extremity Access During Endovascular Aortic Procedures. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 65:729-737. [PMID: 36740094 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.01.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate access failure (AF) and stroke rates of aortic procedures performed with upper extremity access (UEA), and compare results of open surgical vs. percutaneous UEA techniques with closure devices. METHODS A physician initiated, multicentre, ambispective, observational registry (SUPERAXA - NCT04589962) was carried out of patients undergoing aortic procedures requiring UEA, including transcatheter aortic valve replacement, aortic arch, and thoraco-abdominal aortic endovascular repair, pararenal parallel grafts, renovisceral and iliac vessel repair. Only vascular procedures performed with an open surgical or percutaneous (with a suture mediated vessel closure device) UEA were analysed. Risk factors and endpoints were classified according to the Society for Vascular Surgery and VARC-3 (Valve Academic Research Consortium) reporting standards. A logistic regression model was used to identify AF and stroke risk predictors, and propensity matching was employed to compare the UEA closure techniques. RESULTS Sixteen centres registered 1 098 patients (806 men [73.4%]; median age 74 years, interquartile range 69 - 79 years) undergoing vascular procedures using open surgical (76%) or percutaneous (24%) UEA. Overall AF and stroke rates were 6.8% and 3.0%, respectively. Independent predictors of AF by multivariable analysis included pacemaker ipsilateral to the access (odds ratio [OR] 3.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 - 12.1; p = .026), branched and fenestrated procedure (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.2 - 9.6; p = .019) and introducer internal diameter ≥ 14 F (OR 6.6, 95% CI 2.1 - 20.7; p = .001). Stroke was associated with female sex (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.3 - 9.0; p = .013), vessel diameter > 7 mm (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.1 - 13.8; p = .037), and aortic arch procedure (OR 7.3, 95% CI 1.7 - 31.1; p = .007). After 1:1 propensity matching, there was no difference between open surgical and percutaneous cohorts. However, a statistically significantly higher number of adjunctive endovascular procedures was recorded in the percutaneous cohort (p < .001). CONCLUSION AF and stroke rates during complex aortic procedures employing UEA are non-negligible. Therefore, selective use of UEA is warranted. Percutaneous access with vessel closure devices is associated with similar complication rates, but more adjunctive endovascular procedures are required to avoid surgical exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Bertoglio
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Gustavo Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Centre at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrea Melloni
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Speciality Medicine, University of Bologna, IRCCS S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Centre, University Heart and Vascular Centre, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Donald J Adam
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Luca Di Marzo
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Division, Department of Surgery "Paride Stefanini", Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Piffaretti
- Vascular Surgery and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese, Italy
| | - Christopher J Agrusa
- Division of Vascular Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Centre, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wouter Van den Eynde
- Department of Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chamseddin K, Timaran CH, Oderich GS, Tenorio ER, Farber MA, Parodi FE, Schneider DB, Schanzer A, Beck AW, Sweet MP, Zettervall SL, Mendes B, Eagleton MJ, Gasper WJ. Comparison of upper extremity and transfemoral access for fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:704-711. [PMID: 36257344 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The use of upper extremity (UE) access is an accepted and often implemented approach for fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (F-BEVAR). The advent of steerable sheaths has enabled the performance of F-BEVAR using a total transfemoral (TF) approach without UE access, potentially decreasing the risks of cerebral embolic events. The purpose of the present study was to assess the outcomes of F-BEVAR using UE vs TF access. METHODS Prospectively collected data from nine physician-sponsored investigational device exemption studies at U.S. centers were analyzed using a standardized database. All patients were treated for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (CAAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) using industry-manufactured fenestrated and branched stent grafts between 2005 and 2020. The outcomes were compared between patients who had undergone UE vs total TF access. The primary composite outcome was stroke or transient ischemia attack (TIA) and 30-day or in-patient mortality during the perioperative period. The secondary outcomes included technical success, local access-related complications, and perioperative mortality. RESULTS Among 1681 patients (71% men; mean age, 73.43 ± 7.8 years) who had undergone F-BEVAR, 502 had had CAAAs (30%), 535 had had extent IV TAAAs (32%), and 644 had had extent I to III TAAAs (38%). UE access was used for 1103 patients (67%). The right side was used for 395 patients (24%) and the left side for 705 patients (42%). UE access was preferentially used for TAAAs (74% vs 47%; P < .001). In contrast, TF access was used more frequently for CAAAs (53% vs 26%; P < .01). A total of 38 perioperative cerebrovascular events (2.5%), including 32 strokes (1.9%) and 6 TIAs (0.4%), had occurred. Perioperative cerebrovascular events had occurred more frequently with UE access than with TF access (2.8% vs 1.2%; P = .036). An individual component analysis of the primary composite outcome revealed a trend for more frequent strokes (2.3% vs 1.2%; P = .13) and TIAs (0.54% vs 0%; P = .10) in the UE access group. On multivariable analysis, total TF access was associated with a 60% reduction in the frequency of perioperative cerebrovascular events (odds ratio, 0.39; P = .029). No significant differences were observed between UE and TF access in the technical success rate (96.5% vs 96.8%; P = .72), perioperative mortality (2.9% vs 2.6%; P = .72), or local access-related complications (6.5% vs 5.5%; P = .43). CONCLUSIONS In the present large, multicenter, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, a total TF approach for F-BEVAR was associated with a lower rate of perioperative cerebrovascular events compared with UE access. Although the cerebrovascular event rate was low with UE access, the TF approach offered a lower risk of stroke and TIA. UE access will continue to play a role for appropriately selected patients requiring more complex repairs with anatomy not amenable to the TF approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalil Chamseddin
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Carlos H Timaran
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, John P. and Kathrine G. McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, John P. and Kathrine G. McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Mark A Farber
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - F Ezequiel Parodi
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Darren B Schneider
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Andres Schanzer
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA
| | - Adam W Beck
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Matthew P Sweet
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Sara L Zettervall
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Bernardo Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Matthew J Eagleton
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Warren J Gasper
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tresson P, Faveur A, Mennecart T, André R, Bordet M, Millon A. Percutaneous Axillary Artery Puncture: An Efficient Approach for Upper Extremity Access. Ann Vasc Surg 2023:S0890-5096(23)00052-3. [PMID: 36739081 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.01.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim was to analyze the anatomic feasibility of the percutaneous axillary access (PAXA) using cadaverous models and then to analyze the complications associated with PAXA during Fenestrated or Branched Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (F/BEVAR) procedures. METHODS Cadaverous models were used to analyze axillary pedicle after a PAXA on an initial anatomical investigation. A subclavian approach was performed after puncture to assess the injuries caused by the needle. Then, in an observational study, patients who underwent F/BEVAR using a PAXA between July 2019 and July 2021 were included. PAXA-related events and complications were monitored. RESULTS Eleven dissections were performed on cadavers. The axillary vein was injured twice (18.2%); the puncture site on the axillary artery was found on the arterial proximal part, behind the clavicle. Fifty-three patients underwent a F/BEVAR using a PAXA. The mean (SD) age of patients was 74.5 (9.7) years. Most indications for endovascular repair were para-renal aneurysms (66%). Two Proglide® closure devices served to close arterial access in all procedures. Adjunct balloon inflation was used in 19 (35.8%) patients. There were 5 (9.4%) PAXA-related events included preoperative blush in 2 (3.8%) patients, axillary artery dissection in 2 (3.8%), and 1 (1.9%) axillary artery stenosis. Five patients (9.4%) had a postoperative axillary hematoma without need for additional surgical procedure. No PAXA-related complication was found after discharge (mean [SD] 11.7 [7.4] months following surgery). CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous axillary artery access was an efficient upper extremity access and associated with a low rate of PAXA-related events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Tresson
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Service de chirurgie vasculaire et endovasculaire, Bron, France; Intestinal Stroke Center, Centre rHodANien d'isChemie intEStinale (CHANCES Network, Lyon), Lyon, France.
| | - Adama Faveur
- Officer cadet at the French Military Medical School. École de Santé des Armées, Bron, France; Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (Univ Lyon), Villeurbanne, France
| | - Thibaut Mennecart
- Officer cadet at the French Military Medical School. École de Santé des Armées, Bron, France; Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (Univ Lyon), Villeurbanne, France
| | - Rémi André
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Service de chirurgie vasculaire et endovasculaire, Bron, France; Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (Univ Lyon), Villeurbanne, France
| | - Marine Bordet
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Service de chirurgie vasculaire et endovasculaire, Bron, France; Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (Univ Lyon), Villeurbanne, France
| | - Antoine Millon
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Service de chirurgie vasculaire et endovasculaire, Bron, France; Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (Univ Lyon), Villeurbanne, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
DiBartolomeo AD, Miranda E, Pyun AJ, Fleischman F, Magee GA, Han SM. Utilization of retrograde left subclavian branch portal of Gore TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis for physician modified fenestrated branched endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech 2023; 9:101135. [PMID: 36970139 PMCID: PMC10033987 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
A 75-year-old man who had undergone zone 2 thoracic endovascular repair of a symptomatic penetrating aortic ulcer using a Gore TAG thoracic branch endoprosthesis (TBE) device (W.L. Gore & Associates) 5 years before had presented with an enlarging extent I thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. A physician-modified five-vessel fenestrated-branched endograft repair was performed using preloaded wires. The visceral renal vessels were sequentially catheterized from the left brachial access via the TBE portal, and the endograft was deployed in staggered fashion. At 1 year of follow-up, imaging studies demonstrated a stable aneurysm sac, patent visceral renal branches, and no endoleak. The retrograde portal of Gore TAG TBE can facilitate fenestrated-branched endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.
Collapse
|
15
|
Mandigers TJ, Lomazzi C, Domanin M, Piffaretti G, van Herwaarden JA, Trimarchi S. Vascular Access Challenges in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Literature Review. Ann Vasc Surg 2022. [PMID: 37534575 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This review aims to comprehensively summarize access challenges in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) by describing vascular access routes, associated risks, outcomes, and complications. METHODS A literature search was conducted utilizing the PubMed (Medline), Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Qualitative and quantitative data from selected studies are extracted and discussed according to available standards for narrative reviews. RESULTS In total, there were 109 eligible studies based on predefined inclusion- and exclusion criteria. There were 39 original articles or reviews and 57 case series or case reports. This article summarizes the evidence from these studies and discusses traditional retrograde access routes and techniques for TEVAR via a femoral or iliac route, with or without the use of conduits. Next, alternative antegrade access routes and techniques via a brachial, axillary, carotid, ascending aorta, transapical, transcaval, or another route are discussed. Vascular access complications are presented with specific attention to the importance of gender and alternative antegrade access routes. CONCLUSIONS Multiple access routes and techniques are currently available to overcome access challenges associated with TEVAR, based on low grade evidence from heterogeneous studies. Future research that compares different access routes and techniques might help in the development of a tailored access protocol for specific patients with challenging TEVAR access.
Collapse
|
16
|
Patel RJ, Mathlouthi A, Al-Nouri O, Lane JS, Malas MB, Barleben AR. A Single Center Review of a Total Transfemoral Approach to Upper Extremity Access in Branched and Fenestrated Physician Modified Endografts. Ann Vasc Surg 2022; 86:117-126. [PMID: 35809740 PMCID: PMC10339283 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.05.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aortic aneurysms are normally treated by an endovascular approach. Due to the lack of devices and increasing experience, there is a growing number of complex aneurysms undergoing repair by physician modified endografts (PMEGs). Previously, our practice was to target visceral vessels exclusively through upper extremity access. We have since then shifted to an all transfemoral approach when possible. This study aims to show the operative benefits of transfemoral only approaches. METHODS Patients who underwent a PMEG at a tertiary center between 2015 and 2020 were included. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on branched vessel approach-transfemoral only versus axillary or composite (axillary and femoral). Forty-one patients had a pararenal or type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) and 15 patients had more complex TAAA. Primary outcomes were operative time, radiation exposure, fluoroscopy time, contrast, and blood loss. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality and major adverse events. Linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between approach type and the main outcomes. RESULTS Fifty-six patients were included with 48% (n = 27) in the transfemoral group and 52% (n = 29) in the axillary/composite group. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Intraoperative outcomes revealed significant increase in the average operative time (418 vs. 246 min, P < 0.001), in radiation exposure (2,755 vs. 1,740 mGy, P = 0.03), in fluoroscopy time (108 vs. 74 min, P = 0.01) and in blood loss (579 vs. 202 cc, P = 0.002) in the axillary/composite group compared to the transfemoral group. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality or major adverse events including stroke. CONCLUSIONS This study shows a transfemoral approach to complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair as opposed to axillary/composite approach has decreased operative time, radiation exposure, and fluoroscopy time and no significant differences in 30-day mortality or major adverse events. When treating complex aneurysms, improving efficiency is important to minimize morbidity to patients and operators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohini J Patel
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Asma Mathlouthi
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Omar Al-Nouri
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - John S Lane
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Andrew R Barleben
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lima GBB, Dias-Neto M, Tenorio ER, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Oderich GS. Endovascular Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysms. Adv Surg 2022; 56:305-319. [PMID: 36096574 DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2022.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) has gained widespread acceptance in patients with complex aortic aneurysms. It has evolved from an alternative to treat elderly and higher risk patients to the first line of treatment in most patients with suitable anatomy, independent of the clinical risk. Currently, these devices are available off-the-shelf (ready to use) and tailored to the patient anatomy with the options of fenestrated, branched and mixed fenestrated, and branched designs. Reports from single and multicenter experiences and systematic reviews have shown lower mortality and morbidity for FB-EVAR compared with historical results of open surgical repair. The main advantages are noted on mortality, respiratory complications, acute kidney injury, and length of hospital stay. The purpose of this article is to review the advances in the endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms exploring the indications for treatment, preoperative evaluation, patient selection, device design, and implantation technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilherme B B Lima
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite 2850, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Marina Dias-Neto
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite 2850, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite 2850, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Aidin Baghbani-Oskouei
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite 2850, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite 2850, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Marques de Marino P, Hagen M, Katsargyris A, Botos B, Verhoeven EL. Outcomes of upper access with surgical exposure of the axillary artery in fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2022; 64:332-338. [PMID: 35963515 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.07.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to assess the safety of upper access with surgical exposure of the axillary artery in fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/B-EVAR), evaluating neurologic and local complications as well as reinterventions associated with this technique. METHODS All patients undergoing a F/B-EVAR procedure with surgical exposure of the axillary artery between January 2010 and March 2020 were included in this retrospective single-centre study. Endpoints were neurological and access-related complications and reinterventions related to the upper extremity access. Complications related to the technique included stroke/transient ischaemic attack, wound infection, peripheral nerve injury and arterial complications. RESULTS 264 patients (192 male, mean age 70 ± 7 years) were included. Upper access was performed over the left axillary artery in 257 (97%) of the cases, and over the right axillary artery in the remaining seven cases. Six (2,2%) patients had early complications related to the arterial access: four with postoperative bleeding and two with acute arm ischaemia. Two patients with postoperative bleeding and both patients with ischaemic complications required reintervention. One of these patients with arm ischaemia died five weeks after the reintervention due to sepsis complications related to patch infection. Sixteen (6%) patients presented transient arm paraesthesia or sensory neurologic deficit postoperatively. The symptoms completely recovered in all cases with no residual deficits. Perioperative ischaemic stroke occurred in three (1%) patients (two minor, one major). No other access related complications were recorded during follow up in any of the patients with no cases of late stenosis/occlusion. CONCLUSIONS Upper access with surgical exposure of the axillary artery is a safe method for antegrade catheterization of fenestrations and branches in complex endovascular aneurysm repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Marques de Marino
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, General Hospital Nuremberg, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
| | - Maike Hagen
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, General Hospital Nuremberg, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
| | - Athanasios Katsargyris
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, General Hospital Nuremberg, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
| | - Balazs Botos
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, General Hospital Nuremberg, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
| | - Eric L Verhoeven
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, General Hospital Nuremberg, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Porras-Colon J, Knowles M, Timaran CH. Outcomes and strategies for utilization of brachial access and preloaded systems during F/BEVAR. Semin Vasc Surg 2022; 35:287-296. [DOI: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2022.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
20
|
Xodo A, D’Oria M, Mendes B, Bertoglio L, Mani K, Gargiulo M, Budtz-Lilly J, Antonello M, Veraldi GF, Pilon F, Milite D, Calvagna C, Griselli F, Taglialavoro J, Bassini S, Wanhainen A, Lindstrom D, Gallitto E, Mezzetto L, Mastrorilli D, Lepidi S, DeMartino R. Peri-Operative Management of Patients Undergoing Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Repair for Juxtarenal, Pararenal and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Preventing, Recognizing and Treating Complications to Improve Clinical Outcomes. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12071018. [PMID: 35887518 PMCID: PMC9317732 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The advent and refinement of complex endovascular techniques in the last two decades has revolutionized the field of vascular surgery. This has allowed an effective minimally invasive treatment of extensive disease involving the pararenal and the thoracoabdominal aorta. Fenestrated-branched EVAR (F/BEVAR) now represents a feasible technical solution to address these complex diseases, moving the proximal sealing zone above the renal-visceral vessels take-off and preserving their patency. The aim of this paper was to provide a narrative review on the peri-operative management of patients undergoing F/BEVAR procedures for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (JAAA), pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (PRAA) or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurism (TAAA). It will focus on how to prevent, diagnose, and manage the complications ensuing from these complex interventions, in order to improve clinical outcomes. Indeed, F/BEVAR remains a technically, physiologically, and mentally demanding procedure. Intraoperative adverse events often require prolonged or additional procedures and complications may significantly impact a patient's quality of life, health status, and overall cost of care. The presence of standardized preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative pathways of care, together with surgeons and teams with significant experience in aortic surgery, should be considered as crucial points to improve clinical outcomes. Aggressive prevention, prompt diagnosis and timely rescue of any major adverse events following the procedure remain paramount clinical needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Xodo
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, “San Bortolo” Hospital, AULSS8 Berica, 36100 Vicenza, Italy; (A.X.); (F.P.); (D.M.)
| | - Mario D’Oria
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (C.C.); (F.G.); (J.T.); (S.B.); (S.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0403994645
| | - Bernardo Mendes
- Gonda Vascular Center, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY 55902, USA; (B.M.); (R.D.)
| | - Luca Bertoglio
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, “Vita-Salute” San Raffaele University, 58-20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Kevin Mani
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Uppsala, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden; (K.M.); (A.W.); (D.L.)
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Vascular Surgery, IRCCS-University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, DIMES-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (M.G.); (E.G.)
| | - Jacob Budtz-Lilly
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, 161-8200 Aarhus, Denmark;
| | - Michele Antonello
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Padova, DSCTV-University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy;
| | - Gian Franco Veraldi
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (G.F.V.); (L.M.); (D.M.)
| | - Fabio Pilon
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, “San Bortolo” Hospital, AULSS8 Berica, 36100 Vicenza, Italy; (A.X.); (F.P.); (D.M.)
| | - Domenico Milite
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, “San Bortolo” Hospital, AULSS8 Berica, 36100 Vicenza, Italy; (A.X.); (F.P.); (D.M.)
| | - Cristiano Calvagna
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (C.C.); (F.G.); (J.T.); (S.B.); (S.L.)
| | - Filippo Griselli
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (C.C.); (F.G.); (J.T.); (S.B.); (S.L.)
| | - Jacopo Taglialavoro
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (C.C.); (F.G.); (J.T.); (S.B.); (S.L.)
| | - Silvia Bassini
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (C.C.); (F.G.); (J.T.); (S.B.); (S.L.)
| | - Anders Wanhainen
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Uppsala, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden; (K.M.); (A.W.); (D.L.)
| | - David Lindstrom
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Uppsala, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden; (K.M.); (A.W.); (D.L.)
| | - Enrico Gallitto
- Vascular Surgery, IRCCS-University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, DIMES-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (M.G.); (E.G.)
| | - Luca Mezzetto
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (G.F.V.); (L.M.); (D.M.)
| | - Davide Mastrorilli
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (G.F.V.); (L.M.); (D.M.)
| | - Sandro Lepidi
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (C.C.); (F.G.); (J.T.); (S.B.); (S.L.)
| | - Randall DeMartino
- Gonda Vascular Center, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY 55902, USA; (B.M.); (R.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Meertens MM, van Herwaarden JA, de Vries JPPM, Verhagen HJM, van der Laan MJ, Reijnen MMPJ, Schurink GWH, Mees BME. Multicenter Experience of Upper Extremity Access in Complex Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair. J Vasc Surg 2022; 76:1150-1159. [PMID: 35709857 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.04.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Upper extremity access (UEA) for antegrade cannulation of aortic side branches is a relevant part of endovascular treatment of complex aortic aneurysms and can be achieved using several techniques, sites and sides. The purpose of this study was to evaluate different UEA strategies in a multicenter registry of complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS In six aortic centers in the Netherlands, all endovascular aortic procedures from 2006 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received upper extremity access during complex EVAR were included. Primary outcome was a composite endpoint of any access complication, excluding minor hematomas. Secondary outcomes were access characteristics, access complications considered individually, access reinterventions and incidence of ischemic cerebrovascular events. RESULTS 417 patients underwent 437 UEA for 303 fenestrated/branched EVARs, and 114 chimney EVARs. Twenty patients had bilateral, 295 left-sided, and 102 right-sided UEA. 413 approaches were performed surgically and 24 percutaneously. Distal brachial access was used in 89 cases, medial brachial in 149, proximal brachial in 140 and axillary access in 59 cases. No significant differences regarding the composite endpoint of access complications were seen (DBA 11.3% vs. MBA 6.7% vs. PBA 13.6% vs. AA 10.2%; p=.29). Postoperative neuropathy occurred most after proximal brachial access (DBA 1.1% vs. MBA 1.3% vs. PBA 9.3 % vs. AA 5.1%; p=.003). There were no differences in cerebrovascular complications between access sides (right 5.9% vs. left 4.1% vs. bilateral 5%; p=.75). Significantly more overall access complications were seen after a percutaneous approach (29.2% vs. 6.8%; p=.002). In multivariate analysis the risk for access complications after open approach was decreased by male gender (OR 0.27; CI 95% 0.10 - 0.72; p= .009), while an increase in age per year (OR 1.08; CI 95% 1.004 - 1.179; p=.039) and diabetes mellitus type 2 (OR 3.70; CI 95% 1.20 - 11.41; p= .023) increased the risk. CONCLUSION Between the four access localizations, there were no differences in overall access complications. Female gender, diabetes mellitus type 2 and ageing increased the risk for access complications after surgical approach. Furthermore, a percutaneous upper extremity access resulted in higher complication rates than a surgical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M Meertens
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - J A van Herwaarden
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J P P M de Vries
- Department of Vascular Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - H J M Verhagen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M J van der Laan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - M M P J Reijnen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, and Multi-Modality Medical Imaging Group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - G W H Schurink
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, the Netherlands/ Germany
| | - B M E Mees
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, the Netherlands/ Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hauck SR, Eilenberg W, Kupferthaler A, Kern M, Dachs TM, Wressnegger A, Neumayer C, Loewe C, Funovics MA. Use of a Steerable Sheath for Completely Femoral Access in Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair Compared to Upper Extremity Access. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:744-751. [PMID: 35391546 PMCID: PMC9117381 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03064-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare bridging stent graft (BSG) implantation in downward oriented branches in branched endovascular aortic repair (bEVAR), using a commercially available steerable sheath from an exclusively femoral access (TFA) with traditional upper extremity access (UEA). METHODS In a retrospective cohort study, 7 patients with 19 branches in the TFA cohort received BSG insertion using the Medtronic Heli FX steerable sheath from a femoral access, and 10 patients with 32 branches in the UEA cohort from a brachial approach. Technical success, total intervention time, fluoroscopy time, branch cannulation time, and complication rate were recorded. RESULTS Technical success was 19/19 branches in the TFA and 31/32 in the UEA cohort. The mean branch cannulation time was considerably shorter in the TFA group (17 vs. 29 min, p = 0.003), and total intervention time tended to be shorter (169 vs. 217 min, p = 0.176). CONCLUSION Using a commercially available steerable sheath allowed successful cannulation of all branches in this cohort and was associated with significantly shorter branch cannulation times. Potentially, this technique can lower the stroke and brachial puncture site complication risk as well as reduce total intervention time and radiation dose. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2b, retrospective cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven R Hauck
- Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Bioimaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Wolf Eilenberg
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander Kupferthaler
- Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Bioimaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria
- Johannes Kepler University Linz, Medical Faculty, Linz, Austria
| | - Maximilian Kern
- Department of Radiology, Klinik Floridsdorf, Vienna, Austria
| | - Theresa-Marie Dachs
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander Wressnegger
- Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Bioimaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christoph Neumayer
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Loewe
- Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Bioimaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin A Funovics
- Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Bioimaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Scott CK, Driessen AL, Gonzalez MS, Malekpour F, Guardiola GG, Baig MS, Kirkwood ML, Timaran CH. Perioperative neurologic outcomes of right versus left upper extremity access for fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2022; 75:794-802. [PMID: 34597786 PMCID: PMC9013472 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Upper extremity (UE) access is frequently used for fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (F-BEVAR), particularly for complex repairs. Traditionally, left-side UE access has been used to avoid crossing the arch and the origin of the supra-aortic vessels, which could potentially result in cerebral embolization and an increased risk of perioperative cerebrovascular events. More recently, right UE has been more frequently used as it is more convenient and ergonomic. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes and cerebrovascular events after F-BEVAR with the use of right- vs left-side UE access. METHODS During an 8-year period, 453 patients (71% male) underwent F-BEVAR at a single institution. UE access was used in more complex repairs. Left UE access was favored in the past, whereas right UE access is currently the preferred UE access side. Brachial artery cutdown was used in all patients for the placement of a 12F sheath. Outcomes were compared between patients undergoing right vs left UE access. End points included cerebrovascular events, perioperative mortality, technical success, and local access-related complications. RESULTS UE access was used in 361 (80%) patients. The right side was used in 232 (64%) and the left side in 129 (36%) patients for the treatment of 88 (25%) juxtarenal, 135 (38%) suprarenal, and 137 (38%) thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Most procedures were elective (94%). Technical success was achieved in 354 patients (98%). In-patient or 30-day mortality was 3.3%. Five (1%) perioperative strokes occurred in patients undergoing right UE access, of which three were ischemic and two were hemorrhagic. No transient ischemic attacks occurred perioperatively. Two hemorrhagic strokes were associated with permissive hypertension to prevent spinal cord ischemia. No perioperative strokes occurred in patients undergoing left UE access (P = .16). Overall, perioperative strokes occurred with similar frequency in patients undergoing UE (5, 1%) and femoral access only (1, 1%) (P = .99). Arm access-related complications occurred in 15 (5%) patients, 11 (4.8%) on the right side and 4 (6%) on the left side (P = .74). CONCLUSIONS Right UE access can be used for F-BEVAR with low morbidity and minimal risk of perioperative ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attacks. In general, UE access is not associated with an increased risk of perioperative stroke compared with femoral access only. Tight blood pressure control is, however, critical to avoid intracranial bleeding related to uncontrolled hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla K. Scott
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Anna L. Driessen
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Marilisa Soto Gonzalez
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Fatemeh Malekpour
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Gerardo G. Guardiola
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Mirza S. Baig
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Melissa L. Kirkwood
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Carlos H. Timaran
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Percutaneous transAXillary access for endovascular aortic procedures in the multicenter international PAXA registry. J Vasc Surg 2021; 75:868-876.e3. [PMID: 34600031 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of a suture-mediated vascular closure device to perform hemostasis after an axillary artery access during endovascular procedures on the aortic valve, the aorta and its side branches. METHODS A physician-initiated, international, multicenter, retrospective registry was designed to evaluate the success rate (VARC-2 reporting standards) of percutaneous transaxillary access closure with a suture-mediated closure device. Secondary end points were minor access vascular complications, transient peripheral nerve injury, stroke, and influence on periprocedural outcomes of puncture technique. RESULTS Three hundred thirty-one patients (median age, 76 years; 69.2% males) in 11 centers received a percutaneous transaxillary access during endovascular cardiac (n = 166) or vascular (n = 165) procedures. The closure success rate was 84.6%, with 5 open conversions (1.5%), 45 adjunctive endovascular procedures (13.6%), and 1 nerve injury (0.3%). Secondary closure success was obtained in 325 patients (98%) after 7 bare stenting, 37 covered stenting, and 1 thrombin injection. Introducer sheaths 16F or larger (odds ratio, 3.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-11.42) and balloon-assisted hemostasis (odds ratio, 4.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-15.68) were associated with closure failure. A threshold of five percutaneous axillary accesses was associated with decreased rates of open conversion, but not with increased primary closure success. Primary closure success was 90.3% in the 175 patients with sheaths smaller than 16F, performed after the first 5 procedures in each center. Temporary nerve injury and stroke were observed in 2% and 4% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous transaxillary aortic procedures, in selected patients, can be performed with low rates of open conversion. The need for additional endovascular bailout procedures is not negligible when introducers sheaths 16F or larger are required.
Collapse
|
25
|
Kölbel T, Spanos K, Jama K, Behrendt CA, Panuccio G, Eleshra A, Rohlffs F, Jakimowicz T. Early outcomes of the t-Branch off-the-shelf multi-branched stent graft in 542 patients for elective and urgent aortic pathologies - a retrospective observational study. J Vasc Surg 2021; 74:1817-1824. [PMID: 34171424 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.05.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The t-Branch, a standardized off-the-shelf multi-branched stent graft has been used for the treatment of elective and urgent cases in aortic disease. The aim of this study was to assess the early outcomes in terms of technical success, mortality, and morbidity in >500 patients being treated with the t-Branch device. METHODS A two-center retrospective observational study was undertaken including patients treated using the t-Branch (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN) in elective or urgent settings for complex abdominal aortic aneurysm and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm between 2014 and 2019 (early experience 2014-2016; late experience 2017-2019). Primary endpoints were technical success and early (30-day) mortality, and secondary endpoints were early morbidity, endoleak, and target vessel patency rates. Multivariable regression models were used to determine the independent association of risk factors with (1) mortality and (2) spinal cord ischemia. RESULTS A total of 542 patients (mean age, 70.5 ± 8.5 years; 388 men [72%]; mean aneurysm diameter, 7.5 ± 2.5 cm) were included (63% elective; 90% thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm). The technical success rate was 97% (526/542) (elective, 96.7% [328/339] vs urgent, 97.6% [208/213]). The total 30-day mortality rate was 12.3% (8.5% in elective, 15% in symptomatic, and 30% in contained rupture). After multivariate regression analysis, the mortality rate was associated with older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.11; P < .001) and with lower baseline glomerular filtration rate (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99; P < .001). In elective cases, the mortality rate was associated with a history of coronary artery disease (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09-0.73; P < .011) and higher body mass index (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; P < .027). In urgent cases, the mortality rate was associated with older age, (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13; P < .010) and lower baseline glomerular filtration rate (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99; P < .001). The spinal cord ischemia rate was 10.5% (6.5% temporary, 4% permanent) and was associated with the early study period (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.03-3.89; P < .038). The renal impairment rate was 13%, the stroke rate was 2.5%, and the myocardial infarction rate was 1.8%, whereas the access complications rate was 7.7%. On early computed tomography angiography, the primary patency rate for the right renal artery was 99.6%, for the left renal artery was 100%, for the superior mesenteric artery was 99.4%, and for the coeliac trunk was 99.8%. The endoleak I and III rates were 2.7% (15/542) and 2.7% (15/542), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Elective and urgent use of the t-Branch multi-branched off-the shelf stent graft showed high technical success and early target vessel patency rates. Early mortality and morbidity rates were acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany; Departments of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
| | - Katarzyna Jama
- Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Christian-Alexander Behrendt
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ahmed Eleshra
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tomasz Jakimowicz
- Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abisi S, Gkoutzios P, Carmichael M, Patel S, Sallam M, Donati T, Zayed H. The Early Outcomes of BeGraft Peripheral Plus in Branched Endovascular Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther 2021; 28:707-715. [PMID: 34160322 DOI: 10.1177/15266028211025019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE No bridging stent-graft (BSG) has been specifically designed for branched endovascular aortic repair (BEVAR) and therefore different "off-label" stent-grafts have been used. Recently, a third generation of balloon-expandable stent-graft has become available. Here we evaluate the outcomes of the BeGraft Peripheral Plus (B+) used as a BSG for internal/externalor inner branches during BEVAR. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing BEVAR using B+ as a BSG since its release in 2017 were included into the study. The primary endpoints were technical success and target vessel patency during follow-up. Secondary endpoints included the need for adjunct extension and relining of the BSG, branch instability rate, including occlusion, reinterventions for restonosis, kink, fracture, or endoleak (types 1 and 3). RESULTS A total of 163 visceral branches in 46 patients were included with a median follow-up 15 months (4-36 months). Primary technical success was achieved in all visceral branches (69 inner branches and 94 internal/external branches) with the exception of 1 BSG that required serial dilatation until full expansion was achieved with overall branch patency was 98% at 2 years. An additional stent-graft was necessary in 35 branches (21%) following deployment of a B+ BSG to cover a longer bridging distance and optimize the distal and proximal sealing. Relining of B+ BSG was not routinely carried out during the index procedure and a self-expanding uncovered nitinol stent was necessary in only 3% of branches to smooth the distal transition zone between the BSG and target vessel. There were 4 events (2.4%) of branch related instability, including 2 occlusions and 2 late reinterventions for a partial in-stent-graft thrombosis. CONCLUSION Our study findings show satisfactory early outcomes of B+ as a BSG in BEVAR with low occlusion and reintervention rates. Extensions of BSG might be required to achieve adequate seal in the target vessels but routine relining BSG in branches was not required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Said Abisi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Panos Gkoutzios
- Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Michelle Carmichael
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sanjay Patel
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Morad Sallam
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Tommaso Donati
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hany Zayed
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zymvragoudakis V, Donati T, Gkoutzios P, Abisi S. WILD Sheath Technique: "WIre Loop Directional" Sheath for Retrograde Femoral Access in Branched Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2021; 75:518-522. [PMID: 33823251 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (BEVAR) necessitates upper limb access (ULA) to facilitate the antegrade cannulation of downward directional branches and the placement of the bridging stent grafts. Various technical solutions to avoid ULA have been proposed and successfully applied in a limited number of cases. This can be necessary in specific clinical scenarios such as hostile aortic arch and descending thoracic aortic anatomy, or in the case of previous aortic arch and supra-aortic vessels surgery complicating the conventional approach with ULA in BEVAR. Taking inspiration from the prior description of a precursory technique, we report the application of our technique in BEVAR procedures, using standard introducer sheaths as a directional stable platform to facilitate an "All Femoral Access" (AFA) approach without the need for ULA, snaring or commercial steerable sheaths. Our concept is based on utilizing a wire loop to form a directional sheath (WILD sheath technique).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vassilios Zymvragoudakis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Tommaso Donati
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Panos Gkoutzios
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Said Abisi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Eilenberg W, Kölbel T, Rohlffs F, Oderich G, Eleshra A, Tsilimparis N, Debus S, Panuccio G. Comparison of transfemoral versus upper extremity access to antegrade branches in branched endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg 2020; 73:1498-1503. [PMID: 33248122 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We studied the outcomes of transfemoral access (TFA) vs upper extremity access (UEA) for branched endovascular aortic repair (BEVAR). METHODS From January 2016 to October 2019, 152 consecutive patients underwent BEVAR under general anesthesia at a single institution. In 2018, an alternative approach to the antegrade branches using TFA compared with conventional UEA was introduced. The cohort was divided into TFA and UEA groups according to the access approach. The end points were technical success, adverse events (including perioperative stroke/transient ischemic attack), access complications, operation time, and radiation exposure. RESULTS The TFA group included 60 patients (63% male; median age, 71 years; interquartile range [IQR], 65-76 years). The UEA group included 92 patients (67% male; median age, 73 years; IQR, 66-78 years). The number of target vessels (TVs) was similar in both groups (median, 4.0 TVs per procedure; range, 1-7 TVs for both). Technical success was greater in the TFA group (60 of 60 patients; 209 of 209 TVs) than in the UEA group (87 of 92 patients; 334 of 346 TVs; P < .01). The fluoroscopy time (median, 69 minutes; IQR, 48-87 minutes; vs 88 minutes; IQR, 65-104 minutes; P = .39) and contrast agent volume (median, 141 mL; IQR, 123-165 mL; vs median, 130 mL; IQR, 101-157 mL; P = .34) were similar in both groups. The radiation exposure (221 Gy × cm2; IQR, 138-406 Gy × cm2; vs median, 255 Gy × cm2; IQR, 148-425 Gy × cm2; P = .05) was lower and the operation time (median, 300 minutes; IQR, 240-356 minutes; vs median, 364 minutes; IQR, 290-475 minutes; P = .01) was shorter in the TFA group. Brachial access complications (0 of 60 vs 3 of 92 patients) and perioperative strokes/transient ischemic attacks (0 of 60 vs 8 of 92 patients) only occurred in the UEA group (P = .018). CONCLUSIONS The use of TFA to catheterize antegrade branches was associated with a lower rate of complications in the present study and has become our preferred approach for BEVAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolf Eilenberg
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gustavo Oderich
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
| | - Ahmed Eleshra
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Debus
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Töpel I, Betz T, Steinbauer M, Uhl C. Improved stability of steerable sheath access by femoro-femoral crossover wire in branched stent graft repair of complex thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms. Innov Surg Sci 2020; 5:63-65. [PMID: 33506095 PMCID: PMC7798303 DOI: 10.1515/iss-2020-0006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to describe a technique to catheterize antegrade branches of a branched aortic endograft by using a steerable sheath stabilized by a through-and-through wire via a femoral access. Technique After implantation of a branched endovascular graft, a steerable 8.5 F sheath is advanced from the femoral access. After placing the sheath proximal to the branches, a 0.014″ through-and-through wire is established to the contralateral femoral access which is held under slight traction after the curved tip of the sheath is brought into the 180° position. Then catheterization, wire exchange and deployment of the bridging stent is done in standard fashion. Conclusion The use of a through-and-through wire with a steerable sheath for retrograde femoral access adds stability and precision to this technique. It has the potential to reduce the risk of preoperative stroke in complex aortic endovascular repair by avoiding upper extremity access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingolf Töpel
- Department of Vascular Surgery, KH Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Betz
- Department of Vascular Surgery, KH Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Markus Steinbauer
- Department of Vascular Surgery, KH Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Christian Uhl
- Department of Vascular Surgery, KH Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mirza AK, Tenorio ER, Marcondes GB, Lima GBB, Macedo TA, Mendes BC, Oderich GS. Comparison of Cerebral Embolic Events Between Right and Left Upper Extremity Access During Fenestrated/Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair. J Endovasc Ther 2020; 28:70-77. [DOI: 10.1177/1526602820953511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the incidence and outcomes of cerebral embolic events when using right (RUE) vs left upper extremity (LUE) access for fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair (f/bEVAR). Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 290 consecutive patients enrolled in a physician-sponsored Investigational Device Exemption study to evaluate f/bEVAR between 2013 and 2018. Of these, 270 patients (93%) had an upper extremity access with 12-F sheaths, including 205 patients (mean age 75±8 years; 147 men) with LUE and 65 patients (mean age 73±8 years; 42 men) with RUE access. Outcome measures were technical success, procedural metrics, major adverse events (MAEs), any stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), and mortality. Results: Technical success was higher (p=0.04) for LUE (99.6%) vs RUE access (98.4%). Patients treated via RUE access more often had extent I-III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (57% vs 39%, p=0.03). Procedural metrics were similar for LUE vs RUE sides, including endovascular time (255±80 vs 246±83 minutes, respectively; p=0.23), fluoroscopy time (84±32 vs 90±35 minutes, respectively; p=0.80), and contrast volume (156±57 vs 153±56 mL, respectively; p=0.82). Total radiation exposure was significantly higher for LUE vs RUE access (2463±1912 vs 1757±1494 mGy, respectively; p=0.02). There were 2 deaths (1%) at 30 days or during hospital admission, both unrelated to access site complications. MAEs occurred in 32% of patients who had LUE and 26% of those who had RUE access (p=0.44). Five patients (2%) had embolic stroke and none had TIA. Embolic strokes were ipsilateral to the access side in 4 patients and affected the posterior circulation in 3. Two patients (1%) had hemorrhagic strokes. The incidence of stroke was 3% for LUE and 2% for RUE access (p>0.99). Conclusion: Fenestrated/branched stent-graft repair was associated with low rates of cerebral embolic events and no significant difference between the right vs left upper extremity approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleem K. Mirza
- Advanced Endovascular Aortic Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Emanuel R. Tenorio
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, University of Texas Health Science at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Giulianna B. Marcondes
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, University of Texas Health Science at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Guilherme B. B. Lima
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, University of Texas Health Science at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thanila A. Macedo
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, University of Texas Health Science at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bernardo C. Mendes
- Advanced Endovascular Aortic Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Gustavo S. Oderich
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, University of Texas Health Science at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Trihan JE, Lebuhotel I, Desvergnes M, Schneider F. Delayed severe median nerve palsy due to undiagnosed brachial pseudoaneurysm. VASA 2020; 49:418-421. [PMID: 32364429 DOI: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Post-catheterization pseudoaneurysms are a well-known complication of many endovascular procedures at the site of arterial puncture. However, long-term neurological complications due to undiagnosed compression are rare. A 60-year-old man presented to our unit for round, non-pulsatile, painless swelling in the inner side of his upper arm. Clinical examination showed finger paralysis, associated with amyotrophy of the forearm. Large brachial pseudoaneurysm with median nerve compression was diagnosed. The patient underwent autologous vein bypass, with poor 6-month neurological recovery. Early diagnosis of pseudoaneurysms is paramount because, when associated with nerve compression, the longer the diagnostic delay, the poorer the neurological prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Eudes Trihan
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University hospital center of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Iris Lebuhotel
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University hospital center of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Mathieu Desvergnes
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University hospital center of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Fabrice Schneider
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University hospital center of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| |
Collapse
|