Andraska EA, Phillips AR, Reitz KM, Asaadi S, Ho J, McDonald MM, Madigan M, Liang N, Eslami M, Sridharan N. Young patients without prior vascular disease are at increased risk of limb loss and reintervention after acute limb ischemia.
J Vasc Surg 2022;
76:1354-1363.e1. [PMID:
35709858 PMCID:
PMC9890507 DOI:
10.1016/j.jvs.2022.04.052]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The objective of the present study was to categorize the presentation and treatment of acute limb ischemia (ALI) in young patients and compare the adverse outcomes after revascularization compared with that of older patients.
METHODS
All the patients who had presented to a multi-institution healthcare system with ALI from 2016 to 2020 were identified. The presenting features, operative details, and outcomes were included in the present analysis. Patients with existing peripheral arterial disease (acute on chronic) were analyzed separately from those without (de novo thrombosis or embolus). Within these groups, younger patients (age, ≤50 years) were compared with older patients (age, >50 years). The 3-month major adverse limb event-free survival was the primary outcome.
RESULTS
A total of 232 patients (age, 60 ± 16 years; 44% female sex, 87% white race) were included in the analysis. Of the 232 patients, 119 were in the acute on chronic cohort and 113 were in the de novo thrombosis/embolism cohort. Age did not affect the overall outcomes (P = .45) or the outcomes for the acute on chronic group (P = .17). However, in the de novo thrombosis/embolism cohort, patients aged ≤50 years had worse major adverse limb event-free survival compared with patients aged >50 years (hazard ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-5.68; P = .03) after adjustment for Rutherford class, interval from presentation to the operating room, and smoking status. In the de novo thrombosis/embolism group, the operative approach was similar across the age groups (endovascular, 12% vs 14%; open, 48% vs 41%; hybrid, 41% vs 45%; P = .78). In the younger patients, embolism was more likely from a proximal arterial source (71%). In contrast, in the older patients, the source of embolism was more often a cardiac source (86%). The rates of hypercoagulable disease were equal across the age groups (10% vs 10%; P = .95). The In-hospital mortality was 3% overall (acute on chronic, 5%; de novo, 3%).
CONCLUSIONS
Despite advances in interventional options, for patients with ALI due to de novo thrombosis or embolus, younger age was associated with worse short-term limb-related outcomes.
Collapse