Long-term clinical outcomes and technical factors with the Wallstent for treatment of chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction

Interventional treatment for post-thrombotic chronic venous obstruction: Progress and challenges

Chronic venous obstruction, including nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions and post-thrombotic syndrome, presents a significant burden on patients' quality of life and health care systems. Venous recanalization and stenting have emerged as promising minimally invasive approaches, yet challenges in patient selection, procedural techniques, and long-term outcomes persist. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the interventional treatment of post-thrombotic syndrome, focusing on the evolution of endovascular techniques and stenting. Patient selection criteria, procedural details, and the characteristics of dedicated venous stents are discussed. Particular emphasis is given to the role of inflow and other anatomical considerations, along with postoperative management protocols for an optimal long-term outcome.

Indications, technical aspects, and outcomes of stent placement in chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction

BACKGROUND

Iliofemoral venous stent placement (IVS) has evolved to a well-established endovascular treatment modality for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction (CIVO). Dedicated venous stents gained approval from the US Food and Drug Administration in 2019 and solidified IVS as a defined intervention with clear indications, contraindications, risks, benefits, and procedural management principles. This review focuses on the indications, technical aspects and outcomes of stenting for CIVO. Other aspects pertaining to IVS are covered in other articles that are a part of this series.

METHODS

This study conducted a literature search limited to English articles. Three search strategies were used, and references were managed in Covidence software. Four investigators screened and evaluated articles independently, excluding meta-analyses, clinical trial protocols, and nonrelevant studies. Eligible studies, focused on clinical outcomes and stent patencies, underwent thorough review.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 1704 studies, with 147 meeting eligibility criteria after screening and evaluation. Exclusions were based on duplicates, irrelevant content, and noniliac vein stent placement.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful IVS for CIVO relies on meticulous patient selection, consistent use of intravascular ultrasound examination during procedures and attention to the technical details of IVS.

A comprehensive study on venous endovascular management and stenting in deep veins occlusion and stenosis: A review study

Background

Patients with deep venous disease can be classified into two distinct categories: those with disease resulting from known deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which may subsequently lead to post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), and those with disease caused by compressive factors or non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVL). The major factor causing the symptoms in patients with PTS and NIVL is venous hypertension which happens due to venous stenosis or venous obstruction. Nowadays Venous stenting offers a noninvasive approach for treatment of NIVL and PTS demonstrating high patency rate.

Methods

We comprehensively reviewed relevant published papers from 2008 to 2023 that surveyed various influencing factors including the site of occlusion and etiology of occlusions, proper diagnostic imaging, ideal characteristics of venous stents, different dedicated venous stents, pre-operative, concomitant, and post-operative interventions and factors that challenge stenting in both PTS and NIVL patients. The papers were identified by searching the keywords "venous stenting", "PTS", "NIVL", "occlusion", and "stenosis" in PubMed central library MEDLINE and Google Scholar.

Results

Patency rates, post-stent complications, and relevant data according to the patient's quality of life were included and analyzed from 476 identified studies. There is no validated protocol and guideline for using stents in patients with PTS and NIVL.

Conclusion

As there is no validated protocol and guideline for using stents in patients with PTS and NIVL, our study may provide comprehensive information to assist researchers interested in writing the protocol and give them insight.

Iliocaval and iliofemoral venous stenting for obstruction secondary to tumor compression

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients with pelviabdominal masses can suffer from lower extremity symptoms due to venous compression. The effectiveness of venous stenting has been established in extrinsic venous compression in benign conditions like May-Thurner syndrome. In this retrospective study we evaluate the efficacy and safety of caval, iliocaval and iliofemoral venous stenting for cases of extrinsic venous compression caused by malignant masses in cancer patients.

METHODS

IRB-approved retrospective review of patients who underwent iliofemoral venography with venoplasty and stenting between January 2018 and February 2022 was performed. Patients with extrinsic venous compression caused by malignant masses were included. Data on patient demographics, pre-procedure symptoms, procedural technique, stent characteristics, outcomes and follow-up were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to assess technical success, clinical success, primary stent patency and adverse events of the procedure.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (19 males, 18 females) who underwent 45 procedures were included. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was present in 21 (57%) patients. Twenty-nine patients (78%, 95% CI 62-90%) reported clinical improvement of the presenting symptoms. The median overall survival after the procedure was 4.7 months (95% CI 3.58-5.99). Eight (22%) patients were alive at last follow up with median follow up of 10.33 months (Range 2-25 months). Twenty-six patients had patent stents on their last follow up imaging (70%, 95% CI 61%-91%). Two patients had a small access site hematoma which resolved spontaneously. Two patients developed moderate, and 1 patient developed severe adverse events related to post procedure therapeutic anticoagulation.

CONCLUSION

Venous stenting is a safe procedure and should be considered as part of the palliative care for patients with debilitating lower extremity symptoms related to iliocaval and iliofemoral venous compression.

An Evaluation of the Duration of Oral Anticoagulant Use Among Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatment of Nonthrombotic Iliac Vein Lesions

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes associated with the duration of postoperative direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) therapy in patients with nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 176 consecutive patients who underwent stenting for nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions between March 2018 and December 2021. In total, 99 and 77 patients were discharged on a 3-month and >3-month regimen of DOAC therapy, respectively. The primary cumulative endpoint was a composite of thrombotic complications, bleeding complications, primary patency, primary-assisted patency, and secondary patency within 1 year.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing 3-month and >3-month DOAC therapy were similar in age, sex, lesion site, symptoms, and average stent diameter and length. Upon multivariate analysis, the primary cumulative endpoint did not differ between the 2 groups (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-3.30; P = 0.76). Moreover, the primary patency at 1 year did not differ between the groups (HR: 1.50; 95% CI: 0.14-16.54; P = 0.74). Furthermore, there were no discernible differences in the secondary endpoints of bleeding complications (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.22-1.96; P = 0.45) or thrombotic complications (HR: 1.79; 95% CI: 0.55-5.80; P = 0.34) between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-month regimen of DOAC therapy showed a similar risk of postoperative thrombosis and bleeding when compared to longer DOAC therapy durations over the course of 1 year following endovascular intervention. This could be a preferred option for patients with a higher estimated bleeding risk after venous stenting.

Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Arterial and Deep Venous Interventions: Multidisciplinary Expert Opinion From SCAI/AVF/AVLS/SIR/SVM/SVS

Percutaneous revascularization is the primary strategy for treating lower extremity venous and arterial disease. Angiography is limited by its ability to accurately size vessels, precisely determine the degree of stenosis and length of lesions, characterize lesion morphology, or correctly diagnose postintervention complications. These limitations are overcome with use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). IVUS has demonstrated the ability to improve outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention, and there is increasing evidence to support its benefits in the setting of peripheral vascular intervention. At this stage in its evolution, there remains a need to standardize the use and approach to peripheral vascular IVUS imaging. This manuscript represents considerations and consensus perspectives that emerged from a roundtable discussion including 15 physicians with expertise in interventional cardiology, interventional radiology, and vascular surgery, representing 6 cardiovascular specialty societies, held on February 3, 2023. The roundtable's aims were to assess the current state of lower extremity revascularization, identify knowledge gaps and need for evidence, and determine how IVUS can improve care and outcomes for patients with peripheral arterial and deep venous pathology.

Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Arterial and Deep Venous Interventions: Multidisciplinary Expert Opinion From SCAI/AVF/AVLS/SIR/SVM/SVS

Percutaneous revascularization is the primary strategy for treating lower extremity venous and arterial disease. Angiography is limited by its ability to accurately size vessels, precisely determine the degree of stenosis and length of lesions, characterize lesion morphology, or correctly diagnose postintervention complications. These limitations are overcome with use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). IVUS has demonstrated the ability to improve outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention, and there is increasing evidence to support its benefits in the setting of peripheral vascular intervention. At this stage in its evolution, there remains a need to standardize the use and approach to peripheral vascular IVUS imaging. This manuscript represents considerations and consensus perspectives that emerged from a roundtable discussion including 15 physicians with expertise in interventional cardiology, interventional radiology, and vascular surgery, representing 6 cardiovascular specialty societies, held on February 3, 2023. The roundtable's aims were to assess the current state of lower extremity revascularization, identify knowledge gaps and need for evidence, and determine how IVUS can improve care and outcomes for patients with peripheral arterial and deep venous pathology.

Iliocaval and Iliofemoral Venous Stenting for Obstruction Secondary to Tumor Compression: Single Center Experience

Background

Cancer patients with pelviabdominal masses can suffer from lower extremity symptoms due to venous compression. The effectiveness of venous stenting has been established in extrinsic venous compression in benign conditions like May-Thurner syndrome. In this retrospective study we evaluate the efficacy and safety of caval, iliocaval and iliofemoral venous stenting for cases of extrinsic venous compression caused by malignant masses in cancer patients.

Methods

IRB-approved retrospective review of patients who underwent iliofemoral venography with venoplasty and stenting between January 2018 and February 2022 was performed. Patients with extrinsic venous compression caused by malignant masses were included. Data on patient demographics, pre-procedure symptoms, procedural technique, stent characteristics, outcomes and follow-up were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to assess technical success, clinical success, primary stent patency and adverse events of the procedure.

Results

Thirty-seven patients (19 males, 18 females) who underwent 45 procedures were included. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was present in 21 (57%) patients. Twenty-nine patients (78%, 95% CI 62-90%) reported clinical improvement of the presenting symptoms. The median overall survival after the procedure was 4.7 months (95% CI 3.58-5.99). Eight (22%) patients were alive at last follow up with median follow up of 10.33 months (Range 2-25 months). Twenty-six patients had patent stents on their last follow up imaging (70%, 95% CI 61%-91%). Two patients had a small access site hematoma which resolved spontaneously. Two patients developed moderate, and 1 patient developed severe adverse events related to post procedure therapeutic anticoagulation.

Conclusion

Venous stenting is a safe procedure and should be considered as part of the palliative care for patients with debilitating lower extremity symptoms related to iliocaval and iliofemoral venous compression.

Case Report: It's not always about the veins; intervention of bilateral May-Thurner Syndrome secondary to iliac aneurysm

May-Thurner Syndrome (MTS) remains evasive because of the insidiousness and variable etiologies by which it can manifest. In this study, we examine a unique presentation of MTS resulting from compression of both common iliac veins by a right common iliac artery aneurysm that required complex endovascular venous and arterial intervention.

Long-term integrity of 53 iliac vein stents after catheter-directed thrombolysis

BACKGROUND

Long-term surveillance data on venous stent integrity is sparse. There is limited knowledge on whether duplex ultrasound (DUS) can detect potential stent deformities such as kinking, straightening, and fracture, which may impact long-term patency of the stented veins.

PURPOSE

To assess venous stent integrity after at least five years of follow-up and to establish the efficacy of DUS as surveillance in patients with venous stent.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 45 patients with acute iliac-femoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) treated with catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) and stenting >5 years before follow-up. Stents were evaluated with 3D volume low dose non-contrast computed tomography (CT) and DUS for kinking, straightening, stent fracture, and patency. Results from CT scans and DUS were compared to assess the overall agreement between the methods.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 13.2 years (mean = 11.2 years; range = 5.2-15.8 years). 3D CT reconstructions showed normal stent configuration in 47 stents (89%). All intact stents were identified by DUS. In the remaining six stents, 3D CT reconstructions showed compression, tapering, kinking, and minor fracture. DUS recognized all stent complications except the minor fracture. Overall agreement between CT and DUS was 98% (kappa = 0.90). Two cases of stent occlusion were found.

CONCLUSION

The long-term physical resilience of iliac vein stents evaluated with 3D CT in patients treated with CDT for iliofemoral DVT was high. Stent deformities were mostly compression, whereas fracture was rarely seen. DUS seems to be sufficient to evaluate venous stent integrity.

Intravascular ultrasound evaluation during iliofemoral venous stenting is associated with improved midterm patency outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) examination is increasingly used in the treatment of iliofemoral venous disease and provides more sensitive and specific detection of stenotic lesions when compared with traditional multiplanar venography alone. Correlations with deep venous stent patency, however, have not yet been investigated. The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of the use of IVUS examination in addition to multiplanar venography on iliofemoral venous patency.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent stenting for symptomatic thrombotic or nonthrombotic iliofemoral venous lesions (NIVLs) between 2014 and 2020 at a single institution were identified and divided into two groups based on whether IVUS examination was used before stent deployment in addition to multiplanar venography compared with venography alone. A retrospective review of demographic, operative, and follow-up data was performed. Thirty-day and 2-year stent patency were measured as primary end points. χ² analysis, logistic regression models, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to determine outcomes. Technical details and outcomes were additionally examined among patients treated for acute deep venous thrombosis, post-thrombotic syndrome, or NIVLs separately on subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 150 patients (173 limbs, 23 bilateral) who underwent iliofemoral stenting during the study period at our institution (mean age: 48.8 ± 16.8 years, 61% female). Adjunctive IVUS utilization before stent deployment was reported in 69 of 173 (39.9%) treated limbs. IVUS examination was more likely to be used in patients who underwent stenting for NIVLs compared with thrombotic disease (41.0% vs 11.2%, P < .01). There was no difference in the number of stents deployed between IVUS and non-IVUS cohorts. However, IVUS examination was associated with the increased total length of the stent deployed (126 ± 56 vs 112 ± 48 mm, P = .04) and a higher rate of infrainguinal stent extension (17.4% vs 6.7%, P = .03). In addition, mean stent diameter was significantly higher when IVUS examination was performed before stent placement (16.3 ± 3.7 vs 15.2 ± 1.9 mm, P < .01). Both 30-day (98.5% vs 89.4%, P = .02) and 2-year (90.3% vs 78.7%, P = .03) primary patency were significantly higher in the IVUS cohort. Adjunctive IVUS use was found to significantly protect against stent reintervention at 2 years on adjusted Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio: 0.22, 95% confidence interval: 0.07-0.71, P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive IVUS utilization is associated with differences in stent diameter and length selections as well as landing segments in the treatment of thrombotic and nonthrombotic iliofemoral venous disease. IVUS examination before stent deployment significantly protects against 30-day and 2-year stent reintervention when compared with the use of multiplanar venography alone. These data provide stronger evidence for routine IVUS use in addition to venography before iliofemoral venous stenting.

Intravascular ultrasound in peripheral venous and arterial interventions: A contemporary systematic review and grading of the quality of evidence

Although angiography has been the primary imaging modality used in peripheral vascular intervention, this technique has major limitations due to the evaluation of three-dimensional vessels in two dimensions. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is an important adjunctive tool that can address some of these limitations. This systematic review assesses the appropriateness of IVUS as an imaging modality for guiding peripheral intervention through evidence collection and clinical appraisal of studies. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a cohort of 48 studies (29 arterial; 19 venous) detailing IVUS use in peripheral vascular intervention were extracted. Qualitative assessment of the studies evaluated pre- and postprocedure efficacy of IVUS and revealed that IVUS-guided peripheral intervention in arterial and venous diagnosis and treatment was superior to other imaging techniques alone. Each study in the cohort was further assessed for reliability and validity using the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM) level of evidence scale. The majority of both arterial (79.3%) and venous (73.7%) studies received a 2b rating, the second highest level of evidence rating. The evidence to date indicates that IVUS results in better clinical outcomes overall and should be more widely adopted as an adjunctive imaging modality during peripheral intervention. (PROSPERO Registration No.: CRD42021232353).

The Clinical Problem of Pelvic Venous Disorders

Pelvic venous disorders are inter-related pathologic conditions caused by reflux and obstruction in the pelvic veins. It can present a spectrum of clinical features based on the route of transmission of venous hypertension to either distal or caudal venous reservoirs. Imaging can help to visualize pelvic vascular and visceral structures to rule out other gynecologic, gastrointestinal, and urologic diseases. Endovascular treatment, owing to its low invasive nature and high success rate, has become the mainstay in the management of pelvic venous disorders. This article reviews the pathophysiology, clinical presentations, and diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to pelvic venous disorders.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 12-Month Patency After Intervention for Iliofemoral Obstruction Using Dedicated or Non-Dedicated Venous Stents

BACKGROUND

Endovascular stenting of the deep venous system has been proposed as a method to treat patients with symptomatic iliofemoral outflow obstruction. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of this treatment at 1-year following the development of dedicated venous stents.

METHOD AND RESULTS

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies evaluating the effectiveness of venous stent placement. Data were extracted by disease pathogenesis: non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVL), acute thrombotic (DVT), or post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Main outcomes included technical success, stent patency at 1 year and symptom relief. A total of 49 studies reporting outcomes in 5154 patients (NIVL, 1431; DVT, 950; PTS, 2773) were included in the meta-analysis. Technical success rates were comparable among groups (97%-100%). There were no periprocedural deaths. Minor bleeding was reported in up to 5% of patients and major bleeding in 0.5% upon intervention. Transient back pain was noted in 55% of PTS patients following intervention. There was significant heterogeneity between studies reporting outcomes in PTS patients. Primary and cumulative patency at 1 year was: NIVL-96% and 100%; DVT-91% and 97%; PTS (stents above the ligament)-77% and 94%, and; PTS (stents across the ligament)-78% and 94%. There were insufficient data to compare patency outcomes of dedicated and nondedicated venous stents in patients with acute DVT. In NIVL and PTS patients, stent patency was comparable at 1 year. There was inconsistency in the use of validated tools for the measurement of symptoms before and after intervention. When reported, venous claudication, improved in 83% of PTS patients and 90% of NIVL patients, and ulcer healing occurred in 80% of PTS patients and 32% of NIVL patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The first generation of dedicated venous stents perform comparably in terms of patency and clinical outcomes to non-dedicated technologies at 1 year for the treatment of patients with NIVL and PTS. However, significant heterogeneity exists between studies and standardized criteria are urgently needed to report outcomes in patients undergoing deep venous stenting.

Female Gender is a Predictor of Lower Iliac Vein Stenting Patency Rates

BACKGROUND

Iliac venous stenting (IVS) for thrombotic and nonthrombotic venous disease is increasingly used as evidence of the safety, efficacy and durability of these interventions increases. Female gender has been implicated as a predictor of failure in arterial endovascular interventions. We hypothesize that female gender could be predictive of patency rates of iliac vein stenting.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent IVS for thrombotic or nonthrombotic venous disease at our institution from 2007 until 2019 were identified and divided into groups based on gender. Operative notes, venograms, and the electronic health record were then queried to obtain operative details, co-morbid conditions, postoperative outcomes and stent patency. Study outcome was long term patency rate. The data was analyzed using chi-square, logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis as appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 200 consecutive patients (231 limbs) were identified in our retrospective analysis, with a mean age of 48.8 ± 17.3, and BMI of 31.6 ± 8.6. Of those, 119 (59.5%) patients, (131 [56.8%] limbs) were female. Comparisons between the gender groups revealed no difference in age, BMI, or preoperative comorbidities. There was no difference in type of venous disease between male (85% thrombotic, 15% nonthrombotic) and female (84% thrombotic, 16% nonthrombotic), P= 0.830. The male cohort was more likely to present with leg ulceration (17% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.002), and the female cohort was more likely to present with leg edema (98.5% vs. 93.0%, P= 0.03). The male cohort had a higher rate of caval (48% vs. 33.6%, P= 0.027) and infrainguinal stent extension. (11% vs. 6.9%, P= 0.02). Females had a higher rate of left sided stenting (80.9% vs. 66/0%, P= 0.010). There was no difference in the median stent diameter used between the cohorts. Primary patency at 5 years was significantly higher for the male cohort (94.1% vs. 74.4%, P= 0.01) On adjusted multivariable cox regression female gender was a predictor of loss of primary patency within 5 years (HR, 4.04; P= 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single center retrospective analysis of IVS, male patients were found to have better primary stent patency compared to female.

Long-term outcome of dedicated venous stents in management of chronic iliofemoral obstruction

OBJECTIVE

To study the long-term outcomes in patients with occlusive Iliofemoral chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) of benign etiology treated by dedicated venous stents (Zilver Vena stents; Cook, Bloomington, Ind) placed at a single center.

METHODS

We performed retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 58 patients with symptomatic benign lower limb CVI during the period from January 2013 to October 2020. Patients underwent recanalization using Zilver Vena stents at Ain Shams University hospitals. We excluded patients requiring stenting after intervention for acute deep venous thrombosis, CVI due to malignancy or vascular malformations, previous ipsilateral venous interventions, or CVI due to nonobstructive pathology (reflux). Patients were clinically classified at enrollment by the clinical, etiology, anatomy, pathology class, venous disability score, and Villalta score. Primary, assisted primary, and secondary stent patency were assessed. Patients were followed clinically and by duplex, at 1, 3, 6, 12 months and annually for 5 years.

RESULTS

There were 31 males and 27 females, with ages ranging between 25 and 60 years (mean, 43.84 years). All patients had post-thrombotic syndrome with a mean Villalta score of 16.8 (range, 10-31). Patients were treated with dedicated venous stents and had a median follow-up of 60 months. The median venous disability score was 3 at the start of the study with a significant decrease to 1 at 5-year follow-up (P < .001). Twelve-month primary patency, assisted primary patency, and secondary patency were 91.4%, 96.6%, and 98.3%, respectively. At the 5-year follow-up, primary patency was 60.3%, assisted primary patency 65.5%, and secondary patency 81%. There were no instances of stent fracture, migration, or structural deformities.

CONCLUSIONS

Treating iliofemoral venous occlusive disease with a dedicated venous stent is an excellent choice for patients with occlusive post-thrombotic syndrome. The technique has good 1-year and 5-year patency and is associated with significant clinical improvement and few complications.

The impact of venous stenting across the inguinal ligament on primary patency: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Iliac venous stenting is an established treatment option for both post-thrombotic and non-thrombotic iliac venous obstructions. Nonetheless, there is still no consensus on the best medical practice regarding some of these interventions. One area of debate is the safety of extending venous stents across the inguinal ligament (IL), with contradictory results from various authors and overall poor-quality research. This review aims to summarise current knowledge on the effect of venous stent placement across the IL on primary patency.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A literature search was performed on the MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science databases, which returned 531 studies. Eleven studies were included. Data were extracted using piloted forms, and, if necessary, authors were contacted to obtain further information.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Two studies were prospective cohorts, whereas the remaining 9 were retrospective cohorts. Overall study quality was weak. Four studies showed a statistically significant association between stent placement across the IL and decreased primary patency. A multivariate analysis was performed in two of those studies, yet only one maintained statistical significance after multivariate analysis. Two studies reported 4 cases of stent fracture in total, and one study reported 5 cases of stent compression. All cases of stent fracture or compression occurred at the inguinal ligament.

CONCLUSIONS

Although current expert opinion favours stent placement across the IL, there is still insufficient evidence to recommend for or against venous stenting across the IL. Further research is required on comparing alternatives for the treatment of iliac venous lesions that extend into the common femoral vein.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Despite the establishment of venous stenting as a viable treatment option for both post-thrombotic and non-thrombotic iliac venous obstructions, there is an ongoing debate on the safety of extending such stents across the inguinal ligament. There are several publications on this subject, with conflicting results and overall poor-quality research. This is the first systematic review of published clinical evidence on the impact of venous stent placement across the IL on primary patency.

Clinical outcomes and overview of dedicated venous stents for management of chronic iliocaval and femoral deep venous disease

OBJECTIVES

Venous stenting of the lower extremities has grown in popularity and is now considered a key component of the primary treatment strategy for the management of pathologically obstructive or stenotic lesions of the deep venous system. This review aims to provide an overview of the role of venous stenting in the management of chronic conditions affecting the deep venous system of the lower limbs.

METHODS

An overview of venous stents design and current role of stenting procedure in individuals presenting with Chronic Venous Insufficiency (CVI) and presenting the current trials of dedicated venous stenting in management of chronic deep venous lesions. This review provides a focused insight on venous stent design, physical properties and the available dedicated venous stents selected studies with their related patency outcome based on selective literature search of the PubMed database and Cochrane library.

CONCLUSIONS

Dedicated venous stent technology is advancing at a rapid pace alongside the increased undertaking of endovascular deep venous stent reconstruction in the management of iliocaval vein pathologies. The ideal design(s) for venous stents remain unknown, although it is hoped that the presence of new dedicated venous stents in clinical practice will allow the generation of experience and data to advance our understanding in this area.

Use of the VENOVO™ and Sinus Obliquus™ venous stents in the treatment of non-thrombotic or post-thrombotic iliac vein lesions - Short-term results from a multi-centre Asian cohort

OBJECTIVES

Deep venous stenting with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance is gaining favour as the treatment modality of choice for symptomatic ilio-femoral venous occlusive disease. The aim was to determine the short-term patency and symptomatic relief gained using the Bard Venovo™ and Optimed Sinus Obliquus™ stents in the endovascular treatment of non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVL) and post-thrombotic venous obstruction (PTO) from two Asian tertiary vascular centres.

METHODS

Sixty patients (males = 21/60 (35.0%); median age 67 years (interquartile range 54-77)) who underwent IVUS interrogation and ilio-femoral stenting (June 2018-May 2019) in two Asian centres were prospectively followed. Clinical improvement was determined by the revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (rVCSS), pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and ulcer healing rate. Patency rates were evaluated using Duplex ultrasound and computer tomography venogram.

RESULTS

Seventy-one legs were interrogated and stented; 11/60 (18.3%) patients had a bilateral procedure. Indications for surgery were PTO (n = 11/71 (15.5%)) and NIVL (n = 60/71 (84.5%)). Twenty-seven of 71 (38.0%) patients had CEAP 6 disease. The median follow-up was 283 (interquartile range 211-370) days. Technical and procedural success was both 100%. Twenty-one of 71 (29.6%) legs had a combination of Venovo™ and Sinus Obliquus™ stents inserted for concurrent ilio-caval and iliac lesions. There were no major post-operative complications. Six-month primary, assisted primary and secondary patency rates were 94.1, 97.1 and 100%, respectively. There were no stent fractures. Mean rVCSS and VAS improved from 12.26 (±3.31) to 4.33 (±2.78) and 6.97 (±1.38) to 2.03 (±1.65), respectively, at three months (p < 0.01). Complete ulcer healing was seen in 27/27 (100%) patients at three months.

CONCLUSION

Use of Venovo™ and Sinus Obliquus™ stents for symptomatic ilio-femoral venous disease showed excellent six-month primary patency rate with no stent fractures. There were significant clinical improvement and low-device-related complications. Longer follow-up is awaited to see how these dedicated venous stents perform.

Side-by-Side Stenting Repair of a Traumatic Pseudoaneurysm at a Venous Confluence

OBJECTIVES

The incidence and prevalence of iatrogenic vascular trauma in the United States is staggering. This has led to the advent and implementation of more efficient and effective vascular repair methods. Although open surgical repair may still be considered gold standard, new endovascular solutions have emerged as other viable options. When using an endovascular approach, proper stent sizing is vital to a successful repair.

METHODS

We present a case of a traumatic injury and pseudoaneurysm formation at the confluence of the right internal jugular and right subclavian veins during a central line placement. This iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm was treated with endovascular placement of side-by-side stents. A mathematical formula, which we have designated "Matteo's law," was utilized to select properly sized stent grafts to reconstruct the confluence and prevent infolding and endoleaks.

RESULTS

After deployment of kissing stents at the confluence of the right internal jugular and right subclavian veins, a venogram was performed, which demonstrated successful exclusion of the pseudoaneurysm and no endoleaks. Clinical follow-up confirms continued wide open flow through the reconstructed venous confluence at 8 months post-procedure.

CONCLUSION

In reconstruction of a venous confluence, selection of properly sized stent grafts is paramount to preventing infolding and endoleaks. Matteo's law states that the circumference of the native receiving vessel must equal the sum of the circumferences of both kissing stent grafts, subtracting the redundant material where the 2 stents interface.

The 2020 appropriate use criteria for chronic lower extremity venous disease of the American Venous Forum, the Society for Vascular Surgery, the American Vein and Lymphatic Society, and the Society of Interventional Radiology

BACKGROUND

Stimulated by published reports of potentially inappropriate application of venous procedures, the American Venous Forum and its Ethics Task Force in collaboration with multiple other professional societies including the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS), American Vein and Lymphatic Society (AVLS), and the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) developed the appropriate use criteria (AUC) for chronic lower extremity venous disease to provide clarity to the application of venous procedures, duplex ultrasound imaging, timing, and reimbursements.

METHODS

The AUC were developed using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, a validated method of developing appropriateness criteria in health care. By conducting a modified Delphi exercise and incorporating best available evidence and expert opinion, AUC were developed and scored.

RESULTS

There were 119 scenarios rated on a scale of 1 to 9 by an expert panel, with 1 being never appropriate and 9 being appropriate. The majority of scenarios consisted of symptomatic indications were deemed appropriate for venous intervention. For scenarios with anatomically short segments of reflux and/or no symptoms, the indications were rated less appropriate. For the indication of edema, a wide dispersion of ratings was observed especially for short segments of saphenous reflux or stenting for iliac/ inferior vena cava disease, noting that there are multifactorial causes of edema, some of which could coexist with venous disease and possibly impact effectiveness of treatment. Several scenarios were considered never appropriate, including treatment of saphenous veins with no reflux, iliac vein or inferior vena cava stenting for iliac vein compression as an incidental finding by imaging with minimal or no symptoms or signs, and incentivizing sonographers to find reflux.

CONCLUSIONS

The AUC statements are intended to serve as a guide to patient care, particularly in areas where high-quality evidence is lacking to aid clinicians in making day-to-day decisions for common venous interventions. This may also prove useful when applied on a population level, such as practice patterns, and not necessarily to dictate decision making for individual cases. As a product of a collaborative effort, it is hoped that this could be utilized by physicians and multiple stakeholders committed toward improving patient care and to identify and stimulate future research priorities.

[Antithrombotic therapy after iliac vein stenting]

Stenting for iliac vein stenosis or compression has become a common therapeutic approach in recent years. The antithrombotic therapy after the stent deployment, however, reaches no consensus. Medications strategies and patients' prognoses differ in non-thrombotic, acute thrombotic and chronic thrombotic these three circumstances. Non-thrombotic patients usually possess satisfactory stent patency whatever antithrombotic therapy is used. Anticoagulant is the basic medication for acute thrombotic patients, benefits from additional antiplatelet drug remains to be clarified. In terms of chronic thrombotic patients, their prognoses are unsatisfactory under all antithrombotic therapies. In this review, we outlined the recent progress of antithrombotic therapy after iliac vein stenting, aiming to provide feasible medication plans for each circumstance.

Contralateral deep vein thrombosis after stenting across the iliocaval confluence in chronic venous disease – A systematic review

Objective

Stenting of the iliac veins is increasingly considered in the presence of symptomatic obstructive chronic lesions in the iliac vein segment. However, it is often necessary to extend the stented zone into the inferior vena cava, increasing the risk of contralateral iliac vein thrombosis. This study aims to review the current literature concerning the incidence of contralateral deep vein thrombosis after stenting across the iliocaval confluence.

Methods

A systematic review from potentially relevant published articles reporting contralateral deep vein thrombosis after iliac venous stenting between January 2007 and February 2019 was performed.

Results

A total of 764 references were retrieved initially. Twelve studies reporting events of contralateral deep vein thrombosis were selected for review, with a total of 1864 patients. Contralateral deep vein thrombosis incidence varied between 0% and 15.6%. The post-interventional and follow-up anticoagulation regimens were heterogeneous between studies. The decision to maintain patients on anticoagulation and the duration of treatment was based on the presence of comorbidities, hypercoagulable states, post-thrombotic syndrome and history of recurrent deep vein thrombosis. Patients with non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions were either anticoagulated for three or six months after stenting or received no anticoagulation. Patients with post-thrombotic syndrome were anticoagulated for longer periods. Most studies (eight studies) used an oral vitamin K antagonist agent. The data on compliance with anticoagulation treatment is scarce and few references present data on whether contralateral deep vein thrombosis occurred during anticoagulation treatment. The use of antiplatelet agents in addition to the anticoagulant treatment in the follow-up period was also variable.

Conclusion

The incidence of contralateral deep vein thrombosis due to iliac vein jailing is not negligible and reported being as high as 15.6%. Large-scale studies on the ideal antithrombotic treatment and its impact are necessary. It is possible that patients with stent crossing the iliocaval confluence might benefit from long-term antithrombotic treatment.