An open-label randomized controlled trial of low-dose corticosteroid plus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium versus standard corticosteroid treatment for minimal change nephrotic syndrome in adults (MSN Study)

Relapse treatment with low-dose steroids in steroid-sensitive minimal change disease

Background

The treatment of minimal change disease (MCD) consists of a high dose of steroids for several months, implying significant drug toxicity. Nevertheless, relapses of steroid-sensitive MCD usually respond to lower doses of steroids.

Methods

The objective of this study was to analyze whether a low dose of steroids (LDS) is effective for the treatment of MCD relapses. Since 2018, new relapses of steroid-sensitive adult patients with MCD in three Spanish centers have been treated with LDS. The cumulative dose of steroids, the time to remission, and the relapse-free time were compared between relapses treated with LDS and previous relapses of the same patients treated with a standard dose of steroids (SDS).

Results

A total of 51 relapses in 31 patients were treated with LDS and compared with 48 historical relapses of the same patients treated with SDS. The mean doses of prednisone adjusted by weight for the initial treatment were 0.45 mg/kg (0.40-0.51 mg/kg) in the relapses treated with LDS and 0.88 mg/kg (0.81-1.00 mg/kg) in those treated with SDS. The mean cumulative doses of prednisone in LDS- and SDS-treated relapses were 1,191 mg (801-1,890 mg) and 3,700 mg (2,755-5,800 mg), respectively. The duration of treatment was 63 days (42-117 days) in the LDS group and was 140 days (65-195 days) in the SDS group. All patients achieved complete remission within 1 month after steroid therapy in both groups. The times to remission of the LDS and SDS groups were 19.10 ± 12.80 and 18.93 ± 12.98 days, respectively (p = 0.95).

Conclusion

Among the steroid-sensitive patients with MCD, relapse therapy with LDS (0.5 mg/kg) appears effective and allows minimization of the steroid cumulative dose.

Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium therApy versus cyclophosphamide for induction of Remission in Microscopic PolyAngiitis (EMSAR-MPA trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Several studies have demonstrated that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may be an excellent alternative to cyclophosphamide (CYC) or rituximab for the induction of remission in non-life-threatening anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies associated vasculitis because of its strong immunosuppressive potency and low toxicity profile. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) was introduced to reduce gastrointestinal adverse reactions of MMF. This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of EC-MPS combined with glucocorticoid in patients with active and non-life-threatening microscopic polyangiitis (MPA).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. A total of 110 patients with active and non-life-threatening MPA from 11 hospitals in Shanxi Province of China will be recruited and randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either EC-MPS or CYC. All patients will receive the same glucocorticoid plan. We will compare oral EC-MPS (720-1440 mg/day) with intravenous pulsed CYC (7.5-15 mg/kg) administered for 3-6 months. All patients will be switched from their assigned treatment (EC-MPS or CYC) to oral azathioprine (2 mg/kg/day) after remission has been achieved, between 3 and 6 months. Azathioprine will be continued until the study ends at 18 months. The primary end point of efficacy is the remission rate at 6 months. Follow-up will continue for 18 months in order to detect an influence of induction regimen on subsequent relapse rates.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has received approval from the Ethics Committee of the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University (2022YX-026). All participants are required to provide written informed consent and no study-related procedures will be performed until consent is obtained. The results of this trial will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2200063823.

Glomerular Diseases Across Lifespan: Key Differences in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches

Glomerular diseases are common causes of chronic kidney disease in childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. The epidemiology of glomerular diseases differs between different age groups, with minimal change disease being the leading cause of nephrotic syndrome in childhood, while membranous nephropathy and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis are more common in adulthood. IgA vasculitis is also more common in childhood. Moreover, there is a difference in disease severity with more children presenting with a relapsing form of nephrotic syndrome and a more acute presentation of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis and concomitant glomerulonephritis, as highlighted by the higher percentage of cellular crescents on kidney biopsy specimens in comparison with older patients. There is also a female preponderance in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis and more children present with tracheobroncholaryngeal disease. This article aims to summarize differences in the presentation of different glomerular diseases that are encountered commonly by pediatric and adult nephrologists and potential differences in the management.

Interventions for minimal change disease in adults with nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Steroids have been used widely since the early 1970s for the treatment of adult-onset minimal change disease (MCD). Recently, newer agents have been used in adult MCD aiming to reduce the risk of adverse effects. The response rates to immunosuppressive agents in adult MCD are more variable than in children. The optimal agent, dose, and duration of treatment for the first episode of nephrotic syndrome, or for disease relapse(s) have not been determined. This is an update of a review first published in 2008.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to 1) evaluate the benefits and harms of different agents, including both immunosuppressive and non-immunosuppressive agents, in adults with MCD causing the nephrotic syndrome; and 2) evaluate the efficacy of interventions on 'time-to-remission' of nephrotic syndrome, in adults with MCD causing the nephrotic syndrome.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 21 July 2021 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of any intervention for MCD with nephrotic syndrome in adults over 18 years were included. Studies comparing different types, routes, frequencies, and duration of immunosuppressive agents and non-immunosuppressive agents were assessed.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random-effects model and results were expressed as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, or mean difference (MD) for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen RCTs (769 randomised participants) were identified; four studies evaluated different prednisolone regimens, eight studies evaluated the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) (tacrolimus or cyclosporin), two studies evaluated enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and one study evaluated levamisole. In all but two studies of non-corticosteroid agents, reduced-dose prednisolone was given with the treatment agent and the comparator was high-dose prednisolone. In the risk of bias assessment, 11 and seven studies were at low risk of bias for sequence generation and allocation concealment, respectively. No studies were at low risk of performance bias and eight studies were at low risk of detection bias. Thirteen, 10 and six studies were at low risk of attrition bias, reporting bias and other bias, respectively. Compared with no specific treatment, it is uncertain whether prednisolone increases the number with complete remission (1 study, 28 participants: RR 1.44, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.19), complete or partial remission (1 study, 28 participants: RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.95), subsequent relapse (1 study, 28 participants: RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.17), or reduces the adverse effects because the certainty of the evidence is very low. Compared with oral prednisolone alone, it is uncertain whether intravenous methylprednisolone and prednisolone increase the number with complete remission (2 studies, 35 participants: RR 1.76, 95% CI 0.17 to 18.32; I² = 90%), relapse (two studies, 19 participants. RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.15; I² = 0%) or adverse events because the certainty of the evidence is very low. Compared with prednisolone alone, CNIs with reduced-dose prednisolone or without prednisolone probably make little or no difference to the number achieving complete remission (8 studies; 492 participants: RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.05; I² = 0%), complete or partial remission (4 studies, 269 participants: RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.05; I² = 0%), or relapse (7 studies; 422 participants: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.03; I² = 0%) (moderate certainty evidence), may reduce the risk of obesity or Cushing's Syndrome (5 studies; 388 participants: RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.59; I² = 45%) and the risk of acne (4 studies; 270 participants: RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.67; I² = 0%) (low certainty evidence); and had uncertain effects on diabetes or hyperglycaemia, hypertension, and acute kidney injury (AKI) (low certainty evidence). Compared with prednisolone alone, EC-MPS with reduced-dose prednisolone probably make little or no difference to the number undergoing complete remission at 4 weeks (1 study, 114 participants: RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.50), and at 24 weeks probably make little or no difference to the number undergoing complete remission (2 studies, 134 participants: RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.38; I² = 0%) (moderate certainty evidence), complete or partial remission (2 studies 134 participants: RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.12; I² = 0%), relapse (2 studies, 83 participants: RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.07 to 3.74; I² = 56%) (low certainty evidence); or to the adverse events of new-onset glucose intolerance, death, or AKI (low certainty evidence). One study (24 participants) compared levamisole and prednisolone with prednisolone in patients with relapsing disease. The authors identified no differences in mean relapse rate or adverse effects but no standard deviations were provided.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This updated review has identified evidence for the efficacy and adverse effects of CNIs and EC-MPS with or without reduced-dose prednisolone compared with prednisolone alone for the induction of remission in adults with MCD and nephrotic syndrome with some reductions in steroid-associated adverse events. RCT data on the efficacy and adverse effects of rituximab in adults with MCD are awaited. Further, adequately powered RCTs are required to determine the relative efficacies of CNIs and EC-MPS and to evaluate these medications in patients with relapsing or steroid-resistant disease.

B-Cell Dysregulation in Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome: What We Know and What We Need to Discover

The therapeutic efficacy of B-cell depletion by anti-CD20 treatment in pediatric and, more recently, in adult idiopathic nephrotic syndrome patients suggests a key role of B cells in the pathogenesis of the disease. However, their exact role is still unclear. B cells are able to secrete a large variety of antibodies that can protect against infections. However, B-cell dysregulation is well-established in a variety of autoimmune diseases. In parallel with their ability to produce antibodies, pathogenic B cells display altered effector functions by expressing activating surface molecules, which can strongly modify the immune homeostasis, or by producing specific cytokines, which can directly affect either podocyte structure and functions or modulate T-cell homeostasis. Herein, we report the most relevant clinical and experimental evidences of a pathogenic role of B cells in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. We further highlight similarities and differences between children and adults affected by non-genetic forms of the disease and discuss what needs to be investigated in order to define the exact mechanisms underlying the pathogenic role of B cells and to identify more tailored therapeutic approaches.

Steroid Minimization in Adults with Minimal Change Disease

Background

Minimal change disease (MCD) causes approximately 10% of nephrotic syndrome in adults. While glucocorticoids (GCs) effectively induce remission in MCD, the disease has a high relapse rate (50-75%), and repeated exposure to GCs is often required. The adverse effects of GCs are well recognized and commonly encountered with the high doses and recurrent courses used in MCD.

Summary

In this review, we will discuss the standard therapy of MCD in adults and then describe new therapeutic options in induction therapy and treatment of relapses in MCD, minimizing the exposure to GCs.

Key Messages

Steroid minimization strategies may decrease adverse effects in the treatment of MCD.

Circulating plasmablasts and high level of BAFF are hallmarks of minimal change nephrotic syndrome in adults

BACKGROUND

The recent success achieved with the use of B cell-depleting agents in some patients with minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS) suggests an unexpected role for B lymphocytes in the pathogenesis of this immune-mediated glomerular disease. Nevertheless, no extensive B-cell phenotyping analysis has ever been performed in untreated adult patients soon after MCNS diagnosis.

METHODS

We investigated the distribution of the different B-cell subpopulations in 22 untreated adult patients with biopsy-proven MCNS [MCNS relapse (MCNS-Rel)]. We compared these data with those for 24 healthy controls, 13 MCNS patients in remission (with no specific treatment) and 19 patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN).

RESULTS

Patients with MCNS-Rel or IMN had higher proteinuria and lower serum albumin and gammaglobulin levels (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons) than MCNS patients in remission. Plasmablasts were the only B-cell subsets present at significantly higher levels in MCNS-Rel patients than in the patients of the other three groups (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). The lower albumin levels and higher proteinuria levels were positively correlated with the percentage of circulating plasmablasts (Spearman test's ρ = -0.54, P = 0.01 and ρ = 0.65, P = 0.002, respectively). Similarly, the increase of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and the decrease of IgG levels were significantly associated with the percentage of plasmablasts in MCNS-Rel patients (Spearman's ρ = 0.36, P = 0.01 and Spearman's ρ = -0.60, P = 0.01, respectively). Increased production of interleukin (IL)-21, IL-6 and B-cell activating factor (BAFF) in the serum of MCNS-Rel patients was found significantly correlated with the percentage of plasmablasts (ρ = 0.72, P = 0.0002, ρ = 0.49, P = 0.04 and ρ = 0.62, P = 0.009, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in the proportion of circulating plasmablasts seems to be a hallmark of untreated MCNS in adult patients. Further studies are required to more precisely determine the phenotype and functions of these cells.

Apheresis in Adult With Refractory Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome on Native Kidneys

Background

Apheresis is the gold standard for idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) relapse after transplantation, but it remains unknown whether such treatment is useful for adults with refractory INS on native kidneys.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients older than 16 years with biopsy-proven refractory (persistent nephrotic syndrome on corticosteroids plus at least 1 immunosuppressive drug) INS treated by apheresis and followed for at least 3 months.

Results

Between September 1997 and January 2020, 21 patients (focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: 12, minimal change nephrotic syndrome: 9, men: 67%, median age: 34 years) were identified. At last follow-up (12 months), 7 of 21 patients were in complete or partial remission. Remission was associated with older age (51 vs. 30 years, P = 0.05), lower proteinuria (3.9 vs. 7.3 g/d, P = 0.03), and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (28.0 vs. 48.5 ml/min per 1.73 m², P = 0.05) at apheresis. The need for dialysis before apheresis (odds ratio [OR] 22.0 [1.00–524], P = 0.026), age ≥50 years (OR: 22.6 [1.00–524], P = 0.006), a marked (>4.5 g/d) decrease in proteinuria (OR: 9.17 [1.15–73.2], P = 0.041), and a short (<12 months) time between diagnosis and apheresis (OR: 10.8 [1–117], P = 0.043) were significantly associated with remission. Three of 7 patients in remission who were initially on dialysis became dialysis-free; by contrast, none of the 14 patients without remission was initially on dialysis, but 5 of 14 had become dialysis-dependent (P = 0.01).

Conclusion

Apheresis may result in remission in adult patients with refractory INS, particularly in those at risk of renal failure, with limited sensitivity to medical treatments, if apheresis is initiated within a year of diagnosis.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus and Low-Dose Corticosteroid with High-Dose Corticosteroid for Minimal Change Nephrotic Syndrome in Adults

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus is used as a steroid-sparing immunosuppressant in adults with minimal change nephrotic syndrome. However, combined treatment with tacrolimus and low-dose steroid has not been compared with high-dose steroid for induction of clinical remission in a large-scale randomized study.

METHODS

In this 24-week open-label noninferiority study, we randomized 144 adults with minimal change nephrotic syndrome to receive 0.05 mg/kg twice-daily tacrolimus plus once-daily 0.5 mg/kg prednisolone, or once-daily 1 mg/kg prednisolone alone, for up to 8 weeks or until achieving complete remission. Two weeks after complete remission, we tapered the steroid to a maintenance dose of 5-7.5 mg/d in both groups until 24 weeks after study drug initiation. The primary end point was complete remission within 8 weeks (urine protein: creatinine ratio <0.2 g/g). Secondary end points included time until remission and relapse rates (proteinuria and urine protein: creatinine ratio >3.0 g/g) after complete remission to within 24 weeks of study drug initiation.

RESULTS

Complete remission within 8 weeks occurred in 53 of 67 patients (79.1%) receiving tacrolimus and low-dose steroid and 53 of 69 patients (76.8%) receiving high-dose steroid; this difference demonstrated noninferiority, with an upper confidence limit below the predefined threshold (20%) in both intent-to-treat (11.6%) and per-protocol (17.0%) analyses. Groups did not significantly differ in time until remission. Significantly fewer patients relapsed on maintenance tacrolimus (3-8 ng/ml) plus tapered steroid versus tapered steroid alone (5.7% versus 22.6%, respectively; P=0.01). There were no clinically relevant safety differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined tacrolimus and low-dose steroid was noninferior to high-dose steroid for complete remission induction in adults with minimal change nephrotic syndrome. Relapse rates were significantly lower with maintenance tacrolimus and steroid compared with steroid alone. No clinically-relevant differences in safety findings were observed.

Rituximab in adult minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis - What is known and what is still unknown?

Primary forms of minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis are rare podocytopathies and clinically characterized by nephrotic syndrome. Glucocorticoids are the cornerstone of the initial immunosuppressive treatment in these two entities. Especially among adults with minimal change disease or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, relapses, steroid dependence or resistance are common and necessitate re-initiation of steroids and other immunosuppressants. Effective steroid-sparing therapies and introduction of less toxic immunosuppressive agents are urgently needed to reduce undesirable side effects, in particular for patients whose disease course is complex. Rituximab, a B cell depleting monoclonal antibody, is increasingly used off-label in these circumstances, despite a low level of evidence for adult patients. Hence, critical questions concerning drug-safety, long-term efficacy and the optimal regimen for rituximab-treatment remain unanswered. Evidence in the form of large, multicenter studies and randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to overcome these limitations.

Podocytopathies

Podocytopathies are kidney diseases in which direct or indirect podocyte injury drives proteinuria or nephrotic syndrome. In children and young adults, genetic variants in >50 podocyte-expressed genes, syndromal non-podocyte-specific genes and phenocopies with other underlying genetic abnormalities cause podocytopathies associated with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome or severe proteinuria. A variety of genetic variants likely contribute to disease development. Among genes with non-Mendelian inheritance, variants in APOL1 have the largest effect size. In addition to genetic variants, environmental triggers such as immune-related, infection-related, toxic and haemodynamic factors and obesity are also important causes of podocyte injury and frequently combine to cause various degrees of proteinuria in children and adults. Typical manifestations on kidney biopsy are minimal change lesions and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions. Standard treatment for primary podocytopathies manifesting with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions includes glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressive drugs; individuals not responding with a resolution of proteinuria have a poor renal prognosis. Renin-angiotensin system antagonists help to control proteinuria and slow the progression of fibrosis. Symptomatic management may include the use of diuretics, statins, infection prophylaxis and anticoagulation. This Primer discusses a shift in paradigm from patient stratification based on kidney biopsy findings towards personalized management based on clinical, morphological and genetic data as well as pathophysiological understanding.

Systemic safety analysis of mycophenolate in Graves' orbitopathy

PURPOSE

The dual antiproliferative mechanism of mycophenolate appears to be beneficial in Graves' orbitopathy (GO).

METHODS

Safety data from the two published mycophenolate trials and the original database of the European Group on Graves' Orbitopathy (EUGOGO) trial were systematically analyzed. Treatment efficacy stratified by individual visual parameters of activity and severity were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 129 adverse events (AE) involving 50 patients (29.4%) were noted among all mycophenolate-treated patients. Mycophenolate sodium plus intravenous glucocorticoid (MPS + GC) group of the EUGOGO trial recorded significantly more AE (55.4% versus 4.6% of patients affected) and serious adverse events (SAE) (12.5% versus 0%) than mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) group of the Chinese trial. None of those SAE was side effect (SE). Most SE in MPS + GC group were mild. Gastrointestinal disorders, infection and liver dysfunction affected 8.8%, 7.1% and 1.2% of all mycophenolate-treated patients (versus 5.4%, 5.4% and 1.2% of all patients on GC monotherapy, respectively). MPS + GC did not significantly increase the risk of infection or liver dysfunction when compared to GC monotherapy. No cytopenia, serious infection or treatment-related mortality was reported. The much higher AE rates of mycophenolate trials in other autoimmune diseases or transplantations suggested that major mycophenolate toxicities were mostly dose- and duration dependent. Mycophenolate, either as monotherapy or as combination, achieved better overall response than GC monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The risk-benefit ratio of low-dose mycophenolate treatment in active moderate-to-severe GO is highly favorable given its reassuring safety profile with low rate of mild-to-moderate SE and promising efficacy.

Outcomes of Older Patients (≥60 years) with New-Onset Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome Receiving Immunosuppressive Regimen: A Multicentre Study of 116 Patients

Because of its rarity, renal presentation and outcomes of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS; minimal changes disease or focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis) has poorly been described in elderly patients, precluding an individualized therapy procedure. Whether immunosuppressive regimens formerly designed in children and young adults are safe and efficient in elderly remains elusive. In a large multicentric retrospective study that included 116 patients with INS and onset ≥ 60 years of age, we showed that cumulative incidence of renal response was 95% after frontline therapy, with an age-dependent median time-to-response (60 days before 70 years of age at the onset vs. 120 days after; p = 0.03). Cumulative incidence of relapse was 90% at 7 years, with relapse occurring continuously over time. After a median follow-up of 34 months (IQR (12; 57)), 7 patients had died (6%) and 5 reached end-stage renal disease. Complications were highly prevalent: diabetes mellitus (23.3%), hypertension (24.1%), infection requiring hospitalization (21.6%) and acute kidney injury (9.5%). Thus, in older patients with INS and receiving steroids, renal response is delayed and relapse is the rule. Alternative immunosuppressive regimens, including B-cells depleting agents as frontline therapy, should be tested in this subset of patients to improve the mid- to long-term outcomes.