1
|
Carter HM, Beard DJ, Leighton P, Moffatt F, Smith BE, Webster KE, Logan P. 'Going through the motions'; a rich account of the complexity of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction pathway, a UK qualitative study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e079468. [PMID: 39289010 PMCID: PMC11409353 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to understand the lived experiences of patients on the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) pathway up to 3 months before, 3 months after and 1 year after surgery. Study objectives were to explore (1) patient experiences of preoperative and postoperative treatment, (2) views of/involvement in prehabilitation and (3) sources and consistency of healthcare advice. DESIGN Semi-structured interviews analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. SETTING Midlands, England. PARTICIPANTS Purposive sample of 18 participants aged 18-45. Three identified as female and 15 as male. Participants' ethnic origin was white (n=14), Indian (n=2), British Asian (n=1) and Pakistani (n=1). 10 participants were awaiting ACLR, six were 3months postsurgery and two were 1 year postsurgery. RESULTS Participants gave a rich account of ACLR pathway experiences discussing negative impacts of the injury, difficulties with navigating the pathway and making decisions about surgery. Interacting with healthcare professionals and managing the variety of resources, advice and opinions were also highlighted as challenges. Participants reflected on their preoperative journey accounting a wide spectrum of expectations and realities of returning to work and physical activity postoperatively. Prehabilitation was perceived to offer an advantage to recovery, mental well-being, injury knowledge, postoperative rehabilitation and supports a faster return to physical activity. Five themes were identified:Injury experience, impact and support.Navigating the treatment pathway.Sense making in the preoperative period.Uncertainty, expectations and reality of the postsurgical period.Balancing resources, advice and opinions. CONCLUSION This study has illuminated patient experiences of the National Health Service (NHS) ACLR pathway, novel to the evidence base.The results highlight the perceived shortcomings in patient support. They also demonstrate the difficulty patients face when navigating the NHS system, communicating with clinicians, making decisions about treatment and managing conflicting sources of healthcare advice. These problems are more prominent than previously recognised in the literature. REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05529511.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley M Carter
- Physiotherapy Outpatients, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - David J Beard
- Surgical Intervention Trials Unit, Botnar Research Centre, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul Leighton
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Fiona Moffatt
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, UK
| | - Benjamin E Smith
- Physiotherapy Outpatients, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Phillipa Logan
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Carter H, Beard D, Leighton P, Moffatt F, Smith BE, Webster KE, Logan P. Development of an intervention for patients following an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: an online nominal group technique consensus study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e082387. [PMID: 39025812 PMCID: PMC11261705 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES (1) To develop an intervention for to support patients diagnosed with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture with decision-making regarding treatment. (2) To define evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of patients following an ACL rupture. DESIGN Nominal group technique consensus study. SETTING Online meetings with patients and key stakeholders working and receiving treatment in the National Health Service, UK. PARTICIPANTS Consensus meetings composed of eight voting participants and five non-voting facilitators. Voting participants included five clinicians, one outpatient therapy manager and two patients with experience in an ACL rupture and reconstructive surgery. Non-voting facilitators supported group discussions and/or observed study procedures. This included a clinical academic expert, two methodology experts and two patient representatives. METHOD Two online meetings were held. Pre-elicitation material was distributed ahead of the first meeting. Premeeting voting was conducted ahead of both meetings. A draft of the shared decision-making intervention and recommendations were shared ahead of the second meeting. Components were discussed and ranked for inclusion based on a 70% agreement threshold. RESULTS The meetings led to the development of a shared decision-making intervention to support treatment decision-making following an ACL rupture. The intervention includes two components: (1) a patient information leaflet and key questions diagram and (2) option grid. The evidence-based recommendations encompass core components of treatment reaching the 70% threshold agreed by the group. The recommendations cover: (1) advice and education, (2) exercise guidance, (3) intervention delivery, (4) outcome measure use and (5) shared decision-making. CONCLUSION This study has successfully developed a shared decision-making intervention to support ACL treatment decision-making, ready for testing in a future feasibility study. Evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of patients following ACL injury, ready for testing in a National Health Service (UK) setting, are also presented. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05529511.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley Carter
- Physiotherapy Outpatients, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - David Beard
- Surgical Intervention Trials Unit, Botnar Research Centre, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul Leighton
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Fiona Moffatt
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Benjamin E Smith
- Physiotherapy Outpatients, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kate E Webster
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Phillipa Logan
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yu F, Xiao LE, Wang T, Hu Y, Xiao J. Nurse-Assisted Rehabilitation Protocols Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Orthop Nurs 2024; 43:163-178. [PMID: 38861747 DOI: 10.1097/nor.0000000000001030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite significant advancements in surgical instruments and operation skills, short- and long-term outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remain unsatisfactory, as many patients fail to return to their pre-injury level of sports. Inadequate ACL rehabilitation is the primary cause of poor outcomes. Nurses have become a crucial element in the rehabilitation process. Although there is no consensus regarding the optimal post-operative rehabilitation protocols, restoring muscle strength and neuromuscular control are consistently the primary goals. This literature review presents nurse-assisted rehabilitation protocols aiming at improving muscle strength and neuromuscular control. The review discusses postoperative rehabilitation, including home-based and supervised rehabilitation, open and closed kinetic chain exercises, eccentric and concentric training, blood flow restriction training, and plyometric training. Each training protocol has its benefits and drawbacks, and should be used cautiously in specific stages of rehabilitation. Neuromuscular training, such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation, neuromuscular control exercises, and vibration therapy, is considered crucial in rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Yu
- Fang Yu, BD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
- Li-En Xiao, BD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
- Tao Wang, PhD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
- Yong Hu, PhD, Department of Joint Surgery, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, GuangZhou City, GuangDong Province, China
- Jun Xiao, PhD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
| | - Li-En Xiao
- Fang Yu, BD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
- Li-En Xiao, BD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
- Tao Wang, PhD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
- Yong Hu, PhD, Department of Joint Surgery, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, GuangZhou City, GuangDong Province, China
- Jun Xiao, PhD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
| | - Tao Wang
- Fang Yu, BD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
- Li-En Xiao, BD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
- Tao Wang, PhD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
- Yong Hu, PhD, Department of Joint Surgery, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, GuangZhou City, GuangDong Province, China
- Jun Xiao, PhD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
| | - Yong Hu
- Fang Yu, BD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
- Li-En Xiao, BD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
- Tao Wang, PhD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
- Yong Hu, PhD, Department of Joint Surgery, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, GuangZhou City, GuangDong Province, China
- Jun Xiao, PhD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
| | - Jun Xiao
- Fang Yu, BD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
- Li-En Xiao, BD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
- Tao Wang, PhD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
- Yong Hu, PhD, Department of Joint Surgery, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, GuangZhou City, GuangDong Province, China
- Jun Xiao, PhD, Department of Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of GanZhou City, GanZhou City, JiangXi Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alshehri YS. Current views on preoperative rehabilitation practice after anterior cruciate ligament injury among licensed physical therapists in Saudi Arabia: An online-based cross-sectional survey. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e37861. [PMID: 38640285 PMCID: PMC11029962 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000037861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2024] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Preoperative rehabilitation is an important stage to both physically and mentally prepare patients for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and postoperative rehabilitation. This study aimed to investigate the current preoperative rehabilitation practice after anterior cruciate ligament injury among licensed physical therapists in Saudi Arabia. This was an online-based cross-sectional survey. A total of 114 physical therapists completed the survey. The survey consisted of 16 mandatory questions about management strategies, prescribed exercises, patients' physical and psychological concerns, and discussions about nonoperative management. The majority of the respondents used the following preoperative interventions: education (89.5%), closed kinetic chain exercises (66.7%), stretches (63.2%), open kinetic chain exercises (61.4%), proprioceptive exercises (59.6%), cold (56.1%), and activity modification advice (52.6%). More than half of the respondents would recommend patients awaiting ACLR to complete the exercises 2 to 4 times weekly (56.1%) for up to 8 weeks (80.7%) before ACLR. The respondents (73.7%) reported that patients awaiting ACLR did not receive preoperative rehabilitation due to 2 primary factors: the orthopedic team did not refer patients to rehabilitation specialists, and there was a lack of awareness about preoperative rehabilitation. Most therapists (86%) would discuss conservative management if a patient returned to their preinjury level of function before surgery. The surveyed physical therapists reported using various interventions and preoperative rehabilitation lengths with patients awaiting ACLR. The majority of the therapists indicated that patients awaiting ACLR did not receive preoperative rehabilitation. Future studies are needed to establish a consensus on the optimal preoperative rehabilitation program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasir S. Alshehri
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carter HM, Lewis GN, Smith BE. Preoperative predictors for return to physical activity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR): a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:471. [PMID: 37296390 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06489-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rates of return to physical activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery are sub-optimal. Optimising presurgical treatment may improve return rates. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify modifiable preoperative predictors for return to physical activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. METHODS Seven electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE and SPORTDiscus via EBSCOhost, AMED, PsycINFO and EMBASE via OVID and Web of Science) were searched from inception to 31 March 2023. The population of focus was adults aged 18-65 who had undergone primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Studies needed to identify at least one potential modifiable preoperative predictor variable and the relationship between the predictor(s) and return to physical activity. All time-points of assessment and study designs were included. Data extraction was completed by one reviewer and verified by a second reviewer. Two reviewers completed the risk of bias assessment using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. RESULTS The search identified 2281 studies, eight met the inclusion criteria. Five studies scored 'high', and three studies scored 'moderate' risk-of-bias. All preoperative predictors were of very low-quality evidence. Five different outcome measures were used to assess return to physical activity including Tegner, Marx, Physical Activity Scale, return to play at the elite level and return to preinjury level (undefined). This was measured between 1- and 10-years post-surgery. Nine preoperative physical, six psychosocial and five demographic/clinical factors were assessed and four were found to be predictive. These included quadriceps strength, psychological profile, patient estimated ability to return and graft type (patella tendon, BPTB). CONCLUSION Very-low level evidence suggests that increasing quadriceps strength, managing patient expectations of their treatment outcomes, improving motivation to resume preinjury activity levels and considering the use of a BPTB graft will support return to physical activity after ACLR. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was prospectively registered in PROSPERO: CRD 42020222567.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley M Carter
- Department of Physiotherapy, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Florence Nightingale Community Hospital, Derby, UK.
- Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
| | - Gwyn N Lewis
- Auckland University of Technology, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Benjamin E Smith
- Department of Physiotherapy, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Florence Nightingale Community Hospital, Derby, UK
- Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Irving L, Smith TO, Mandalia VI, Pratt A, Dowen D. Surgeon and physiotherapist approaches to operative or non-operative management of people with recurrent patellar dislocation: A case-based UK survey. Musculoskeletal Care 2023; 21:434-443. [PMID: 36398738 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physiotherapists are often key decision-makers on when to refer patients with recurrent patellar dislocation for surgical opinion. Limited guidance exists to aid this decision. Differences in orthopaedic surgeons' and physiotherapists' views on which patients and when to refer people for surgical consideration or non-operative care may affect outcome. This study aimed to explore orthopaedic surgeons and physiotherapists decision-making surrounding treatment opinions for patients with recurrent patellar dislocation. METHODS An online survey performed. UK registered and practicing orthopaedic surgeons and physiotherapists were invited to participate. The survey utilised two vignettes and a series of related questions to ascertain respondents' views on decision-making to surgical referral for people with recurrent patellar dislocation. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and inferential statistical tests to explore factors related to responses. RESULTS Eighty four respondent surveys were analysed (38 surgeons, 46 physiotherapists). Overall, there was a low level of agreement amongst respondents for the management of the vignettes (k = 0.215, p = < 0.0005). Some disparity existed between the professions on the definition of recurrent patellar dislocations and the clinical features which may require an early surgical assessment. Physiotherapists were three times more likely to delay a surgical opinion for the vignettes presented in this study than the surgeons. CONCLUSION This is the first study to investigate orthopaedic surgeons' and physiotherapists' views on decision-making around surgical or non-operative management for recurrent patellar dislocations. High-quality research is required to underpin explicit guidance on decision-making regarding management of recurrent patellar dislocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Irving
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Sunderland Royal Hospital, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | - Toby O Smith
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Vipul I Mandalia
- Exeter Knee Reconstruction Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - Arthur Pratt
- Translational and Clinical Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Daniel Dowen
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Sunderland Royal Hospital, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Piedade SR, Leite Arruda BP, de Vasconcelos RA, Parker DA, Maffulli N. Rehabilitation And Advances In Surgical Reconstruction For Anterior Cruciate Ligament Insufficiency: What Has Changed Since The 1960s? - State Of The Art. J ISAKOS 2022:S2059-7754(22)00094-3. [PMID: 36410671 DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2022.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency can be disabling, given the physical and sports activity constraints that negatively impact the quality of life. Consequently, surgery is the main approach for most active patients. Nonetheless, ACL reconstruction (ACLR) cannot be successful without adequate preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation. Since the 1960s, post-ACLR rehabilitation has evolved, mainly from advances in surgery, coupled with a better understanding of the biological concepts of graft revascularization, maturation and integration, which have impacted ACL postoperative rehabilitation protocols. However, new technologies do involve a definite learning curve which could affect rehabilitation programs and produce inconsistent results. The development of rehabilitation protocols cannot be defined without an accurate diagnosis of ACL injury and considering the patient's main physical demands and expectations. This article discusses how postoperative rehabilitation following ACLR has changed from the 1960s to now, focussing on surgical technique (type of tendon graft, fixation devices, and graft tensioning), biological concepts (graft maturation and integration), rehabilitation protocols (prevention of ACL injuries, preoperative rehabilitation, postoperative rehabilitation), criteria to return to sports, patient's reported outcomes and outcome. Although rehabilitation plays an essential role in managing ACL injuries, it cannot be fully standardised preoperatively or postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation should be based on an accurate clinical diagnosis, patients' understanding of their injury, graft tissue biology and biomechanics, surgical technique, the patient's physical demands and expectations, geographical differences in ACL rehabilitation and future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio R Piedade
- Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedics, Rheumatology, and Traumatology, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, 13083-887, Brazil.
| | | | | | - David A Parker
- Sydney Orthopaedic Research Institute, Chatswood, NSW 206, Australia
| | - Nicola Maffulli
- Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Mile End Hospital, 275 Bancroft Road, London E1 4DG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sonesson S, Kvist J. Rehabilitation after ACL injury and reconstruction from the patients' perspective. Phys Ther Sport 2021; 53:158-165. [PMID: 34656448 DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe and compare patients' appraisal of the rehabilitation and adherence to the rehabilitation program after acute ACL injury treated with (ACLR) or without (non-ACLR) reconstruction. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS 275 patients (143 females; mean age 25 ± 7 years) with acute ACL injury, of whom 166 patients had ACLR within 24 months. MAIN OUTCOME Adherence to rehabilitation was assessed using the modified Sports Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale (SIRAS). RESULTS Appraisal of rehabilitation was higher in the post-ACLR group compared to the non-ACLR group at 3 months (91% compared to 70% scored rehabilitation as necessary, p = 0.025) and at 6 months (87% compared to 70% scored it as necessary, p = 0.017). SIRAS score did not differ between 3 and 6 months for the non-ACLR group (median (IQR) 13 (2) vs 13 (2)) or the post-ACLR group (14 (1) vs 14 (2), p > 0.05). The post-ACLR group had a higher SIRAS score than the non-ACLR group at 3 and 6 months (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION Patients treated with ACLR reported valuing their rehabilitation more and rated greater adherence to the rehabilitation programme than non-surgically treated patients. As rehabilitation is essential for good knee function, strategies to improve adherence after non-ACLR treatment should be implemented. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prospective cohort study, level II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofi Sonesson
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
| | - Joanna Kvist
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Centre for Medical Image Science and Visualisation (CMIV), Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Current perspectives and clinical practice of physiotherapists on assessment, rehabilitation, and return to sport criteria after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. An online survey of 538 physiotherapists. Phys Ther Sport 2021; 52:103-114. [PMID: 34479178 DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the perspectives and clinical practice of physiotherapists regarding rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). DESIGN Online survey. SETTING Survey platform. PARTICIPANTS Greek physiotherapists. OUTCOME MEASURES The survey consisted of 7 sections: participant demographics, importance of ACLR rehabilitation, clinical measurements, practice, criteria to progress rehabilitation, return to running and return to sport. RESULTS Significant variability in measures and criteria used for clinical decision-making were found including: limb symmetry in strength and function, knee range of motion and effusion, progression, and return to sport criteria. The majority of the practitioners (28.3%) extrapolate knee strength from hop capacity. Return to running ranged from 3 to 5 months post-operatively reflecting that this was tied to physical capacities, not time from surgery. 70.0% of the Greek physiotherapists would allow return to sport ≤9 months after ACLR. Agreement was found in using: physical measures, function, and dynamic stability in ACLR rehabilitation, but the mode and interpretation varied substantially. Less than 29.0% of the physiotherapists reported using patient-reported outcome measures in their decision-making. CONCLUSION Current ACLR rehabilitation practices in Greece are largely not aligned with the contemporary scientific evidence and guidelines.
Collapse
|
10
|
Sonesson S, Gauffin H, Kvist J. Early knee status affects self-reported knee function 1 year after non-surgically treated anterior cruciate ligament injury. Phys Ther Sport 2021; 50:173-183. [PMID: 34052567 DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The primary aim was to assess impact of early knee status on self-reported knee function at 3 and 12 months and on quadriceps strength at 12 months after non-surgically treated ACL injury. The secondary aim was to describe the recovery of muscle strength during the first year after the injury. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS 70 patients (42 males; mean age 27 ± 7 years) with acute ACL injury. MAIN OUTCOME Knee symptoms, knee function and sporting activities were assessed with the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF). Muscle strength was assessed with an isokinetic dynamometer. Clinical assessment performed at baseline was used to evaluate early knee status. RESULTS Global knee function, knee joint stability during ADL, gait pattern and one-legged squat assessed in mean 2 weeks after injury hadimpact on self-reported knee function at 3 and 12 months (r2 0.105-0.267). Mean limb symmetry index (LSI) of muscle strength and jump performance were 91-98% at 12 months. CONCLUSION Early knee symptoms affect self-reported knee function at 3 and 12 months, while other factors are important for gaining muscle strength. Muscle strength recovered during the first year after ACL injury and reached mean LSI above 90%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prospective cohort study, level II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofi Sonesson
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
| | - Håkan Gauffin
- Department of Orthopaedics and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Joanna Kvist
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|