PD-L1 expression in lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements

Heterogeneity in PD-L1 expression between primary and metastatic lymph nodes: a predictor of EGFR-TKI therapy response in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

There is inconclusive evidence to suggest that the expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a putative predictor of response to EGFR-TKI therapy in advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the heterogeneity in PD-L1 expression in the primary lung site and metastatic lymph nodes to analyze the association between PD-L1 expression and response for patients treated with EGFR-TKI.

METHODS

This study reviewed 184 advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations who received first-generation EGFR-TKI as first-line treatment from 2020 to 2021 at Shanghai Chest Hospital. The patients were divided into the primary lung site group (n = 100) and the metastatic lymph nodes group (n = 84) according to the biopsy site. The patients in each group were divided into TPS < 1%, TPS 1-49%, and TPS ≥ 50% groups according to PD-L1 expression.

RESULTS

The median PFS was 7 (95% CI: 5.7-8.3) months, and the median OS was 26 (95% CI: 23.5-28.5) months for all patients. No correlation existed between PFS or OS and PD-L1 expression. The median PFS in the primary lung site group was 11 months (95% CI: 9.6-12.4) in the TPS < 1% group, 8 months (95% CI: 6.6-9.4) in TPS 1-49% group, and 4 months (95% CI: 3.2-4.8) in TPS ≥ 50% group, with statistically significant differences (p = 0.000). The median OS of the TPS < 1% group and TPS ≥ 50% group showed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.008) in the primary lung site group. In contrast, PD-L1 expression in the lymph nodes of EGFR-mutant patients was unrelated to PFS or OS after EGFR-TKI therapy.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression from the primary lung site might predict clinical benefit from EGFR-TKI, whereas PD-L1 from metastatic lymph nodes did not.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Chest Hospital (ID: IS23060) and performed following the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 (revised 2008).

Comparing Genomic Profiles of ALK Fusion-Positive and ALK Fusion-Negative Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Background  Anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK ) fusion events account for 3 to 7% of genetic alterations in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to explore the landscape of ALK fusion-positive and ALK fusion-negative in a large cohort of NSCLC patients. Methods  The formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens of NSCLC patients who underwent next-generation sequencing from 2020 to 2023 in Yinfeng Gene Technology Co., Ltd. Clinical laboratory were included in this study. Results  In the current study, a total of 180 (3.20%) patients tested positive for ALK fusions in 5,622 NSCLC samples. Within the ALK -positive cohort, a total of 228 ALK fusions were identified. Furthermore, five novel ALK fusion partners, including DAB1-ALK , KCMF1-ALK , KIF13A-ALK , LOC643770-ALK , and XDH-ALK were identified. In cases with ALK fusion-positive, TP53 alterations were the most prevalent (26.3%), followed by CDKN2A (8.4%), epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR , 5.6%), and ALK (5.6%). By contrast, EGFR alterations were most prevalent (51%) in patients with ALK fusion-negative NSCLC, followed by TP53 (42.7%), KRAS (11.6%), and CDKN2A (11.3%). A total of 10 cases where ALK fusion co-occurred with EGFR mutations were also identified. Notably, the ALK fusion positivity rate was higher in younger patients ( p  < 0.0001) and in female patients ( p  = 0.0429). Additionally, positive ALK test results were more prevalent in patients with high programmed death-ligand 1 expression, especially when applying a 50% cutoff. Conclusions  Collectively, these findings offer valuable genomic insights that could inform the personalized clinical care of patients with NSCLC harboring ALK fusions within the context of precision medicine.

Association of PD-L1 expression and clinical outcomes in ROS1 - rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with crizotinib

Background

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is more readily expressed in ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to NSCLC cases lacking driver gene mutations. Prior research has established a link between PD-L1 expression and reduced effectiveness of EGFR or ALK inhibitors in EGFR or ALK-positive NSCLC. Nonetheless, the relationship between initial PD-L1 levels and the clinical impact of first-line crizotinib therapy in ROS1-rearranged NSCLC is still uncertain.

Methods

From January 2016 to December 2021, a total of 246 patients with ROS1 positive tumors were collected. Out of these, 82 patients with advanced ROS1-rearranged NSCLC, who were treated with crizotinib as their initial therapy, were selected for the study. The study aimed primarily to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), and secondarily to assess disease control rate (DCR) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Of the 82 advanced ROS1-rearranged NSCLC patients, 38 exhibited PD-L1 positivity, subdivided into 11 with high and 27 with low expression levels, while the remaining 44 showed no PD-L1 expression. The ORR for all included patients was 80.5%. No statistically significant variance in ORR was observed among ROS1-rearranged NSCLC patients across differing PD-L1 expression statuses. However, there was a statistically significant difference in DCR between PD-L1 negative group (100%) and high expression group (90.9%) (p=0.04). The median PFS spanned 26.4 months for the PD-L1 negative group, 16.6 for the low expression group, and 13.7 for the high expression group (p=0.001). Additionally, a notable statistical disparity was also observed in median PFS between the PD-L1 negative and positive groups (p=0.02). For the entire study population, the median OS was 53.0 months (95% CI 43.8 - 62.2). In the PD-L1-negative group, the median OS reached 57.2 months, compared to 53.0 months in the PD-L1-positive group, a difference lacking statistical significance (p=0.43).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that for ROS1-positive NSCLC patients receiving crizotinib as first-line therapy, PD-L1 expression may serve as a negative prognostic marker for PFS rather than OS.

Prospective observational study to explore genes and proteins predicting efficacy and safety of brigatinib for ALK-gene rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer: study protocol for ABRAID study (WJOG11919L)

Background

ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) are effective for treating non-small-cell lung cancer with ALK gene rearrangement; however, resistance is inevitable. Brigatinib is a unique ALK-TKI that is effective against many resistance mutations. However, data on factors associated with its efficacy and resistance mechanisms are limited.

Objectives

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of brigatinib in the real world and explore factors related to its efficacy, safety, and resistance mechanisms.

Design

Prospective observational study.

Ethics

This study is approved by the Ethics Committee of Wakayama Medical University. Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients before study-related procedures.

Methods and analysis

This study comprises three cohorts. Cohorts A, B, and 0 will enroll patients receiving alectinib as the first ALK-TKI, receiving alectinib as the first ALK-TKI and subsequently cytotoxic agents and/or lorlatinib after alectinib, and without a history of ALK-TKI, respectively. Overall, 100, 30, and 50 patients will be enrolled in Cohorts A, B, and 0, respectively. Circulating tumor DNA before starting brigatinib and at disease progression will be analyzed in all cohorts using a hypersensitive next-generation sequencing (NGS) PGDx Elio plasma resolve panel. Serum protein levels will be analyzed using the Milliplex xMAP assay system with a Luminex 200 (Luminex, Austin, USA). The enrollment period is 31 months and the patients will be observed for 2 years after enrollment. Archived tissues will be collected for NGS analysis, gene expression analysis, and immunohistochemistry staining 1 year after completion of registration. Quality of life and safety evaluation using electronic patient-reported outcomes will be investigated.

Discussion

This study will elucidate predictors of ALK-TKI efficacy and resistance mechanisms and evaluate the efficacy and safety of brigatinib in a real-world setting. The results will provide crucial information for establishing treatment strategies, discovering novel biomarkers, and developing new therapeutic agents.

Trial registration

UMIN000042439.

Evaluating the Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Exon 20 Insertions

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion (EGFR ex20ins), an uncommon mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), can induce poor patient response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). However, the clinical features and prognosis of patients with EGFR ex20ins are not clearly understood. This study investigated the clinical characteristics and prognosis of advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins.

METHODS

Advanced NSCLC patients treated at Fujian Cancer Hospital were consecutively recruited from June 1, 2014 to December 20, 2021 and retrospectively examined. EGFR ex20ins was identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or next-generation sequencing (NGS). The clinical characteristics, treatment methods, and patient outcomes were retrieved from the hospital database. The progression-free survival (PFS)  and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen mutation subtypes of EGFR ex20ins were identified in the 24 enrolled patients, with EGFR ex20ins mutation more prevalent in non-smoking women. A763_Y764insFQEA and A767_V769dup (12.5% for both) were the most common mutation subtypes. Notably, no significant differences in PFS and OS were found between the first-line targeted therapy group [PFS: 257 days, 95% confidence interval (CI): 116-397 days; OS: not reached] and chemotherapy-based combination therapy group (PFS: 182 days, 95% CI: 156-207 days; OS: 998 days, 95% CI: 674-1321 days). TP53 mutation was the commonest concomitant mutation (62%), followed by EGFR amplification (25%). Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy improved the prognosis of patients with high PD-L1 expression.

CONCLUSION

For NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins, limited therapeutic benefits can be gleaned from either EGFR-TKIs or chemotherapy-based combination therapy.

Molecular pathology of non-small cell carcinoma

Currently, lung cancer is treated by the highest number of therapeutic options and the benefits are based on multiple large-scale sequencing studies, translational research and new drug development, which has promoted our understanding of the molecular pathology of lung cancer. According to the driver alterations, different characteristics have been revealed, such as differences in ethnic prevalence, median age and alteration patterns. Consequently, beyond traditional chemoradiotherapy, molecular-targeted therapy and treatment with immune check-point inhibitors (ICI) also became available major therapeutic options. Interestingly, clinical results suggest that the recently established therapies target distinct lung cancer proportions, particularly between the EGFR/ALK and PD-1/PD-L1-positive subsets, e.g. the kinase inhibitors target driver mutation-positive tumours, whereas driver mutation-negative tumours respond to ICI treatment. These therapeutic efficacy-related differences might be explained by the molecular pathogenesis of lung cancer. Addictive driver mutations promote tumour formation with powerful transformation performance, resulting in a low tumour mutation burden, reduced immune surveillance, and subsequent poor response to ICIs. In contrast, regular tobacco smoke exposure repeatedly injures the proximal airway epithelium, leading to accumulated genetic alterations. In the latter pathway, overgrowth due to alteration and immunological exclusion against neoantigens is initially balanced. However, tumours could be generated from certain clones that outcompete immunological exclusion and outgrow the others. Consequently, this cancer type responds to immune check-point treatment. These pathogenic differences are explained well by the two-compartment model, focusing upon the anatomical and functional composition of distinct cellular components between the terminal respiratory unit and the air-conducting system.

PDL1-status predicts primary resistance of metastatic, EGFR-mutated non small cell lung cancers to EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the reference treatment for metastatic, EGFR-mutated, non-small-cell lung cancers (EGFRm NSCLCs). However, 16-20% of those tumors progress early (3-6 months) and factors predicting that resistance are unknown. This study was undertaken to examine PDL1 status as such a factor.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included metastatic, EGFRm-NSCLC patients who received first-line 1st-, 2nd- or 3rd-generation EGFR TKIs with PDL1 expression determined in pretreatment biopsies. Kaplan-Meier estimations of probabilities of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared with log-rank test, and logistic-regression analyses.

RESULTS

PDL1 status of the 145 included patients was ≥1% (47%), 1-49% (33%) or ≥50% (14%). For PDL1-positive vs PDL1-negative patients, respectively, median PFS lasted 8 (95% CI: 6-12) vs 12 (95% CI: 11-17) months (p = 0.008), with 18% vs. 8% (NS) of NSCLCs progressing at 3 months, and 47% vs. 18% (HR 0.25 [95% CI 0.10-0.566], p<0.001) at 6 months. Multivariate analysis retained 1st- or 2nd-generation EGFR TKI, brain metastases and albuminemia <35 g/L at diagnosis as significantly associated with shorter PFS, but not PDL1 status, which was independently associated with progression at 6 months (HR 3.76 [1.23-12.63], p = 0.02). PDL1-negative and PDL1-positive patients' OS lasted 27 (95% CI 24-39) and 22 (95% CI 19-41) months, respectively (NS). Multivariate analysis retained only brain metastases or albuminemia <35 g/L at diagnosis as being independently associated with OS.

CONCLUSION

PDL1 expression ≥1% seems to be associated with early progression during the first 6 months of first-line EGFR-TKI treatment of metastatic EGFRm NSCLCs, without impacting OS.

Influence of PD-L1 expression on the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Evidence on the influence of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is at variance.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the influence of PD-L1 expression on the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation. Clinical information was retrieved from electronic medical records. The patients were divided into three subgroups according to PD-L1 expression level: PD-L1 < 1% (negative), PD-L1 1%-49% and PD-L1 ≥ 50%. The clinicopathological features, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and comutation information were collected and compared between the three subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients were included. For PD-L1 < 1%, PD-L1 1%-49% and PD-L1 ≥ 50% group, there were 39 (33.3%), 51 (43.5%) and 27 (23.0%) patients respectively, and the ORR was 43.2%, 64.0%, and 51.9%, respectively (p = 0.162), and the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 22.0 months (95% CI: 14.0-29.9 months), 15.4 months (95% CI: 8.9-21.8 months) and 13.0 months (95% CI: 10.6-15.3 months), respectively (log-rank, p = 0.01). The mPFS was negatively correlated with PD-L1 expression level (r = -0.264, p = 0.041) and PD-L1 expression was an independent risk factor for worse PFS of EGFR-TKIs in multivariate Cox regression. Patients with concurrent TP53 mutation had shorter PFS (p = 0.039) and the patients harboring both mutant TP53 and positive PD-L1 had the shortest PFS (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of EGFR-TKIs was influenced by the baseline PD-L1 expression. Higher PD-L1 expression was associated with shorter PFS. The combined indicators of TP53 and PD-L1 identified subgroups showing divergent benefits from EGFR-TKIs.

Common driver mutations and programmed death-ligand 1 expression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer in smokers and never smokers

BACKGROUND

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there may be a relationship between programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, driver mutations and cigarette smoking.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, the relationship between common driver mutations (EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement) and PD-L1 expression in advanced NSCLC according to the patients' smoking history was examined. Light, moderate and heavy smokers had smoked < 20, 20-39, and ≥ 40 pack-years, respectively. The level of PD-L1 expression, assessed using Ventana SP263 monoclonal antibody assay, was defined by the tumor proportion score (TPS) as high expression (TPS ≥ 50%), low expression (TPS 1%-49%) and no expression (TPS < 1%).

RESULTS

101 (52.9%) of 191 advanced NSCLC patients were never smokers. EGFR mutations were more common in never smokers (64.4%) than in smokers (17.8%) with advanced NSCLC (P < 0.0001). A higher proportion of smokers (26.7%) had high PD-L1 expression compared to never smokers (13.9%) (P = 0.042). There was a trend for a higher proportion of male NSCLC patients [28 of 115 (24.3%)] than female patients [10 of 76 (13.2%)] to have high PD-L1 expression (P = 0.087]. High PD-L1 expression was seen in 32 of 110 (29.1%) patients with EGFR wild-type NSCLC but only in 6 of 81 (7.4%) patients with EGFR-mutant tumors (P < 0.0001). Among the 90 smokers with NSCLC, a higher proportion of heavy smokers (35.8%) than non-heavy smokers (13.5%) had high PD-L1 expression (P = 0.034). In patients with adenocarcinoma, high PD-L1 expression was seen in 25 of 77 (32.5%) patients with EGFR wild-type tumors but only in 4 of 70 (5.7%) patients with EGFR-mutant tumors (P < 0.0001). Among patients with adenocarcinoma, a significantly higher proportion of ever smokers (29.3%) than never smokers (13.5%) had high PD-L1 expression (P = 0.032). Among smokers with adenocarcinoma, a significantly higher proportion of heavy smokers (44.1%) than non-heavy smokers (8.3%) had high PD-L1 expression (P = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for gender and smoking status, heavy smoking and EGFR wild-type tumors remained significantly associated with high PD-L1 expression in NSCLCs and also in adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Heavy smoking and EGFR wild-type tumors were significantly associated with high PD-L1 expression in NSCLCs and also in adenocarcinoma.

Management of Oncogene Driven Locally Advanced Unresectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

The current standard of care of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiation, followed by consolidation durvalumab. However, there is evidence that the efficacy of chemoradiation and also immunotherapy in many oncogene-positive LA-NSCLC are attenuated, and dependent on the subgroup.

AREAS COVERED

We will firstly review the outcomes of standard-of-care therapy in oncogene-driven LA-NSCLC. We looked at various oncogene driven subgroups and the tumor microenvironment that may explain differential response. Finally, we review the role of targeted therapy in the treatment of LA-NSCLC.

EXPERT OPINION

Each oncogene-positive subgroup should be treated as its own entity, and continued efforts should be undertaken to incorporate targeted therapy, which is likely to yield superior survival outcomes if trial design can be optimized and toxicities can be managed.

Regulation of PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer by interleukin-1β

Introduction

Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a biomarker for prediction of the clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in various cancer types. The role of cytokines in regulation of PD-L1 expression in tumor cells has not been fully characterized, however. Here we show that interleukin-1β (IL-1β) plays a key role in regulation of PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We performed comprehensive screening of cytokine gene expression in NSCLC tissue using available single-cell RNA-Sequence data. Then we examined the role of IL-1β in vitro to elucidate its induction of PD-L1 on NSCLC cells.

Results

The IL-1β gene is highly expressed in the tumor microenvironment, particularly in macrophages. The combination of IL-1β and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) induced a synergistic increase in PD-L1 expression in NSCLC cell lines. IL-1β and IFN-γ also cooperatively activated mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling and promoted the binding of downstream transcription factors to the PD-L1 gene promoter. Furthermore, inhibitors of MAPK signaling blocked upregulation of PD-L1 by IL-1β and IFN-γ.

Discussion

Our study reports high levels of IL-1β in the tumor microenvironment may cooperate with IFN-γ to induce maximal PD-L1 expression in tumor cells via activation of MAPK signaling, with the IL-1β-MAPK axis being a promising therapeutic target for attenuation of PD-L1-mediated suppression of antitumor immunity.

High PD-L1 Expression Correlates with an Immunosuppressive Tumour Immune Microenvironment and Worse Prognosis in ALK-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

High tumour programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is associated with poor progression-free survival (PFS) after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the characteristics of the tumour microenvironment (TME) and their prognostic values in ALK-rearranged NSCLC are unknown. Here, we collected tumour tissues from pretreated ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients, immunohistochemical staining was used to assess PD-L1 expression, and tumour-infiltrating immune cells were determined via multiplex immunofluorescence staining (mIF). Our data showed that the median values of PFS for the high PD-L1 group and low PD-L1 group who received ALK-TKI treatment were 4.4 and 16.4 months, respectively (p = 0.008). The median overall survival (OS) of the two groups was 24.0 months and not reached, respectively (p = 0.021). Via univariate and multivariate analyses, a high PD-L1 expression and a worse ECOG PS were determined to be independent prognostic factors of OS (HR = 3.35, 95% CI: 1.23-9.11, p = 0.018; HR = 6.42, 95% CI: 1.45-28.44, p = 0.014, respectively). In addition, the high PD-L1 group had increased Tregs and exhausted CD8+ T cells in both the tumour and stroma (all p < 0.05). High PD-L1 expression was an adverse predictive and prognostic biomarker for ALK-rearranged NSCLC. The characteristics of the TME in patients with high PD-L1 expression were shown to have an immunosuppressive status.

Association of PD-L1 expression with efficacy of alectinib in advanced NSCLC patients with ALK fusion

BACKGROUND

Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was found to be a biomarker of inferior efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether PD-L1 expression could also serve as a similar biomarker in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive patients, especially for those treated with front-line alectinib, remains unclear. The aim of the study is to investigate the association of PD-L1 expression and efficacy of alectinib in this setting.

METHODS

From January 2018 to March 2020, 225 patients with ALK-rearranged lung cancer were consecutively collected at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University. Baseline PD-L1 expression was detected using immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 56 patients of advanced ALK-rearranged lung cancer who received front-line alectinib.

RESULTS

Among the 56 eligible patients, 30 (53.6%) were PD-L1 expression negative, 19 (33.9%) patients had TPS 1%-49% and 7 (12.5%) had TPS ≥ 50%.We found no statistically significant associations between PD-L1 positivity and objective response rate (ORR, 90.0% vs. 80.8%, p = 0.274) or progression-free survival (PFS, not reached vs. not reached, HR: 0.98, 95 %CI: 0.37-2.61, p = 0.97) in patients treated with alectinib. Meanwhile, patients with PD-L1 high expression (TPS ≥ 50%) had a trend of longer PFS (not reached vs. not reached, p = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 expression might not serve as a predict biomarker for the efficacy of front-line alectinib in ALK-positive NSCLC patients.

Effect of BIM expression on the prognostic value of PD-L1 in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with EGFR-TKIs

The role of Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in predicting epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKIs) efficacy remains controversial. Recent studies have highlighted that tumor-intrinsic PD-L1 signaling can be modulated by STAT3, AKT, MET oncogenic pathway, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, or BIM expression. This study aimed to investigate whether these underlying mechanisms affect the prognostic role of PD-L1. We retrospectively enrolled patients with EGFR mutant advanced stage NSCLC who received first-line EGFR-TKI between January 2017 and June 2019, the treatment efficacy of EGFR-TKI was assessed. Kaplan-Meier analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) revealed that patients with high BIM expression had shorter PFS, regardless of PD-L1 expression. This result was also supported by the COX proportional hazard regression analysis. In vitro, we further proved that the knockdown of BIM, instead of PDL1, induced more cell apoptosis following gefitinib treatment. Our data suggest that among the pathways affecting tumor-intrinsic PD-L1 signaling, BIM is potentially the underlying mechanism that affects the role of PD-L1 expression in predicting response to EGFR TKI and mediates cell apoptosis under treatment with gefitinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Further prospective studies are required to validate these results.

Response to treatment with an ALK-TKI in a patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with concurrent ALK fusion and high PD-L1 expression: A case report

RATIONALE

Previous studies have shown that PD-L1 TPS ≥50% in lung cancer rarely overlaps with driver oncogenes such as epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). The initial gene detection of the patient in this study showed ALK fusion combined with high expression of PD-L1. We explored the treatment options for this patient.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 34-year-old woman presented for the first time with "repeated fever and cough for 20 days." The patient denied any underlying medical history.

DIAGNOSIS

After a series of imaging examinations and needle biopsy, the patient was diagnosed as stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with multiple liver and bone metastases (EML4-ALK fusion, PD-L1 TPS 80%).

INTERVENTIONS

The patient was initially given alectinib targeted therapy. After progression, a second round of genetic testing was performed and the patient was detected to have both ALK fusion and BRAF mutation. The patient was then successively changed to treatment with ensatinib combined with dabrafenib, and lorlatinib combined with dabrafenib.

OUTCOMES

The initial efficacy evaluation of alectinib was PR, but its PFS was only 4 months. The patient only achieved an overall survival of 10 months.

LESSONS

Non-small cell lung cancer with an ALK fusion and high PD-L1 expression responds poorly to most current treatment options, with survival time after ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment notably shorter than that of patients with an ALK fusion alone.

Various impacts of driver mutations on the PD-L1 expression of NSCLC

We aimed to evaluate whether different driver mutations have varying impacts on the programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and whether the prognostic roles of PD-L1 amongst our patients were divergent. This was a single-institute study that included patients with NSCLC. Six driver mutations, PD-L1 status, and the outcomes of treatment were assessed. A total of 1,001 NSCLC patients were included for analysis. Overall, the PD-L1 positive (TPS ≥ 1%) and strong positive (TPS ≥ 50%) rates were 52.2% and 17.3%, respectively. As compared with wild type lung adenocarcinoma, EGFR-mutant and HER2-mutant patients had similarly low PD-L1 and strong PD-L1 positive rates. BRAF-mutant patients had numerically higher PD-L1 and strong PD-L1 positive rates. Patients with fusion mutation (ALK and ROS1) (aOR 2.32 [95% CI 1.10-4.88], P = 0.027 and 2.33 [95% CI 1.11-4.89], P = 0.026), KRAS mutation (aOR 2.58 [95% CI 1.16-5.75], P = 0.020 and 2.44 [95% CI 1.11-5.35], P = 0.026), and non-adenocarcinoma histology (aOR 2.73 [95% CI 1.72-4.34], P < 0.001 and 1.93 [95% CI 1.13-3.30], P = 0.016) all had significantly higher PD-L1 and strong PD-L1 positive rates. A trend towards longer survival was noted in ROS-1 rearranged and KRAS-mutant patients with strong PD-L1 expression who had received crizotinib and chemotherapy, respectively. In conclusion, individual driver mutations had various impacts on the PD-L1 expression of NSCLC patients. The prognostic role of PD-L1 may also be divergent amongst patients harboring different driver mutations.

Real-world efficacy of osimertinib in previously EGFR-TKI treated NSCLC patients without identification of T790M mutation

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of osimertinib in previously EGFR-TKI-treated NSCLC without identification of T790M mutational status remains unclear in real-world practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

417 patients had stage III-IV NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation and 154 out of 417 patients receiving osimertinib as ≥ second-line EGFR-TKI were identified. The time to treatment failure and risk of death were analyzed.

RESULTS

Higher risk of death was found in EGFR-mutant patients with age ≥ 65 years, non-adenocarcinoma, no surgery or radiation, non-exon 19 deletion/exon 21 L858R, higher ECOG PS (2-4), PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%, and bone/liver/adrenal metastasis (all p < 0.05). Osimertinib as ≥ second-line TKI in patients with/without identification of T790M revealed lower risk of death compared to first-line first/second generation TKI without subsequent osimertinib (p = 0.0002; 0.0232, respectively). However, osimertinib-treated patients with T790M did not have superior survival than those without (p = 0.2803). A higher risk of treatment failure for osimertinib was found in males, patients with first-line TKI duration ≤ 12 months, BMI drop > 10%, and PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% (All p < 0.05). Nonetheless, osimertinib as ≥ second-line TKI in patients without identification of 790 M did not have higher risk of treatment failure than those with T790M (p = 0.1236).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that osimertinib as second line or subsequent TKI in EGFR-TKI-treated patients without identification of T790M revealed lower risk of death compared to first-line first/second generation TKI without subsequent osimertinib, in real-world practice. Additionally, EGFR-mutant patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% had a higher risk of treatment failure for osimertinib and worse overall survival than those with PD-L1 expression < 50%. These results suggest that osimertinib as second line or subsequent TKI may be a potential alternative option for the treatment of patients without identification of T790M and PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% is associated with a significantly poor outcome in patients receiving osimertinib.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-special immunity and immunotherapy

Alterations in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene play a key role in the development of various human tumors, and targeted therapy has transformed the treatment paradigm for these oncogene-driven tumors. However, primary or acquired resistance remains a challenge. ALK gene variants (such as gene rearrangements and mutations) also play a key role in the tumor immune microenvironment. Immunotherapy targeting the ALK gene has potential clinical applications. Here, we review the results of recent studies on the immunological relevance of ALK-altered tumors, which provides important insights into the development of tumor immunotherapies targeting this large class of tumors.

EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Resistance to Immunotherapy: Role of the Tumor Microenvironment

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. About 10–30% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbor mutations of the EGFR gene. The Tumor Microenvironment (TME) of patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations displays peculiar characteristics and may modulate the antitumor immune response. EGFR activation increases PD-L1 expression in tumor cells, inducing T cell apoptosis and immune escape. EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) strengthen MHC class I and II antigen presentation in response to IFN-γ, boost CD8+ T-cells levels and DCs, eliminate FOXP3+ Tregs, inhibit macrophage polarization into the M2 phenotype, and decrease PD-L1 expression in cancer cells. Thus, targeted therapy blocks specific signaling pathways, whereas immunotherapy stimulates the immune system to attack tumor cells evading immune surveillance. A combination of TKIs and immunotherapy may have suboptimal synergistic effects. However, data are controversial because activated EGFR signaling allows NSCLC cells to use multiple strategies to create an immunosuppressive TME, including recruitment of Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Tregs and the production of inhibitory cytokines and metabolites. Therefore, these mechanisms should be characterized and targeted by a combined pharmacological approach that also concerns disease stage, cancer-related inflammation with related systemic symptoms, and the general status of the patients to overcome the single-drug resistance development.

Diagnostic Value and Cost-Effectiveness of Next Generation Sequencing-Based Testing for Treatment of Patients with Advanced/Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States

The study evaluated the diagnostic value and cost-effectiveness of next generation sequencing (NGS)-based testing versus various combinations of single-gene tests (SGTs) for selection of first-line treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in the United States. A dynamic decision analysis model was developed comparing NGS versus SGT from a payer perspective. Inputs were obtained from published sources and included diagnostic performance, biomarker-positive disease rates, biomarker-directed recommendations for treatment, and survival outcomes. Costs were reported in 2020 US dollars. In the base case, NGS improved the detection of actionable biomarkers by 74.4%, increased the proportion of patients receiving biomarker-driven therapy by 11.9%, and decreased the proportion of patients with biomarker-positive disease receiving non-biomarker-driven first-line treatment by 40.5%. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per life-year gained of NGS testing versus SGT was $7224 (excluding post-diagnostic costs); the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for NGS-directed therapy was $148,786 versus SGT-directed therapy. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings; survival outcomes and targeted therapy costs had the greatest impact on results. Testing strategies with NGS are more comprehensive in the detection of actionable biomarkers and can improve the proportion of patients receiving biomarker-driven therapies. NGS testing may provide a cost-effective strategy for advanced/metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer; however, the value of NGS-directed therapy varies by the willingness-to-pay threshold of the decision-maker.

EGFR mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and its correlation with PD-L1 expression: a meta-analysis

Meta-analysis was performed on the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to evaluate the effect of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status on programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors, and the association between EGFR mutation status and PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Pooled effect (hazard ratio/odds ratio, HR/OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated, and the source of heterogeneity was explored by subgroup analysis and meta-regression using Stata/SE 15.0. Meta-analysis of the association between EGFR mutation status and overall survival (OS) in NSCLC with immunotherapy was calculated from four randomized controlled trials. We found that immune checkpoint inhibitors significantly prolonged OS over docetaxel overall (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.64-0.79) and in the EGFR wild type (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.60-0.75), but not in the EGFR mutant subgroup (HR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.80-1.52). Meta-analysis of the association between EGFR mutation status and PD-L1 expression in NSCLC included 32 studies. The pooled OR and 95% CI were 0.60 (0.46-0.80), calculated by random effects model. No source of heterogeneity was found in subgroup analysis. Sensitivity analysis was carried out with a fixed model, and the influence of a single study on the pooled results showed no significant change with robust meta-analysis methods. Harbord's weighted linear regression test (P = 0.956) and Peters regression test (P = 0.489) indicated no significant publication bias. The limited benefit of single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the second-line or later setting for EGFR-mutated NSCLC may be partly due to the lower expression of PD-L1.

ESMO expert consensus statements on the management of EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer in 2021. The consensus included a multidisciplinary panel of 34 leading experts in the management of lung cancer. The aim of the consensus was to develop recommendations on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline and where the available evidence is either limited or conflicting. The main topics identified for discussion were: (i) tissue and biomarkers analyses; (ii) early and locally advanced disease; (iii) metastatic disease and (iv) clinical trial design, patient's perspective and miscellaneous. The expert panel was divided into four working groups to address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript presents the recommendations developed, including findings from the expert panel discussions, consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.

Investigation on the survival implications of PD-L1 expression status in ALK- rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line crizotinib

BACKGROUND

Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression has been associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) of crizotinib-treated patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the association between PD-L1 expression and overall survival (OS) in ALK-rearranged NSCLC remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the survival implication of baseline PD-L1 expression status in crizotinib-treated patients with ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Between October 1, 2015, and October 31, 2021, we retrospectively analyzed the baseline PD-L1 expression levels using immunohistochemistry 22C3 assay of tissue samples from 128 patients with ALK-rearranged advanced lung adenocarcinoma who were treated with first-line crizotinib.

RESULTS

Of the 128 baseline tumor specimens analyzed, a majority (76.6%, n = 98) had low PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score (TPS) < 50%), wherein 58.6% (n = 75) had < 1% and 18.0% (n = 23) had 1%-49%, and the remaining 23.4% (n = 30) had high PD-L1 expression level (TPS ≥ 50%). High baseline PD-L1 expression was not associated with any clinical characteristic examined. Patients with high baseline PD-L1 (n = 30) expression level had significantly shorter median PFS (6 vs 11 months, p = 0.011) and OS (17 vs 53 months, p = 0.023) on crizotinib treatment than those with low PD-L1 level (n = 98).

CONCLUSIONS

A subset of patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC having high baseline PD-L1 expression level (TPS of ≥ 50%) had poorer survival outcomes despite crizotinib therapy. Our study raises the need to investigate alternative treatment strategies to improve survival outcomes of this patient subset.

ALK fusion variant 3a/b, concomitant mutations, and high PD-L1 expression were associated with unfavorable clinical response to second-generation ALK TKIs in patients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (GASTO 1061)

OBJECTIVES

Second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but clinical responses vary widely. In this study, the impacts of ALK fusion variants, concomitant mutations, and PD-L1 expression on the clinical response were evaluated in patients receiving second-generation ALK TKIs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 193 patients with ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC who received second-generation ALK TKIs at Sun-yat Sen University Cancer Center from January 2015 to December 2020. The ALK fusion variants and concomitant mutations were identified with next-generation sequencing, while PD-L1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly shorter for variant 3a/b than for other variants (9.93 months vs 16.97 months, HR 1.941, P = 0.0014). Baseline concomitant mutations were significantly associated with shorter PFS while on ALK TKIs (median PFS, 10.87 months vs 22.47 months, HR 1.984, P = 0.002). A subset of 68 patients was analyzed for PD-L1 expression: TPS 0% in 32.4% (22/68) of the patients, 1-49% in 30.9% (21/68) of the patients, and ≥ 50% in 36.7% (25/68) of the patients. Expression of PD-L1 was significantly associated with variant 3a/b and concomitant mutations. Median PFS was shorter in patients with high PD-L1 expression (median PFS in patients with PD-L1 TPS of 0% vs 1-49% vs ≥ 50% were 27.43 months vs 30.63 months vs 9.50 months, respectively, P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥ 50%), concomitant mutations, and variant 3a/b remained negative prognostic factors for the clinical efficacy of second-generation ALK TKIs in ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer.

CONCLUSION

ALK fusion variant 3a/b, concomitant mutations, and high PD-L1 expression were associated with unfavorable clinical response to second-generation TKIs in ALK-rearranged NSCLC.

The impact of driver mutation on the treatment outcome of early-stage lung cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy have improved the major pathological response (MPR) in patients with early-stage operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to assess whether the presence of targetable driver mutations affects the efficacy of the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy. We enrolled patients with early-stage operable NSCLC who received preoperative neoadjuvant therapy between January 1, 2017, and December 30, 2020. Neoadjuvant therapy was delivered with platinum-doublet chemotherapy; moreover, pembrolizumab was added at the attending physician’s discretion based on patient’s request. Pathological responses were assessed; moreover, disease-free survival was estimated. Next-generation sequencing was performed in case sufficient preoperative biopsy specimens were obtained. We included 23 patients; among them, 11 received a combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy while 12 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. The MPR and pathological complete response rates were 54.5% and 27.3%, respectively, in patients who received a combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy. These rates were significantly higher than those in patients who only received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Three patients in the combination group experienced disease recurrence during the follow-up period even though two of them showed an MPR. These three patients had targetable driver mutations, including an EGFR exon 20 insertion, EGFR exon 21 L858R substitution, and MET exon 14 skipping. Only one patient who remained disease-free had a targetable driver mutation. Among patients with early-stage operable NSCLC requiring neoadjuvant therapy, comprehensive genomic profiling is crucial before the administration of the combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Advanced EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Over the last decade, the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone rapid changes with innovations in oncogene-directed therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. In patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutant (EGFRm) NSCLC, newer-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are providing unparalleled survival benefit and tolerability. Unfortunately, most patients will experience disease progression and thus an urgent need exists for improved subsequent lines of therapies. The concurrent revolution in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is providing novel treatment options with improved clinical outcomes in wild-type EGFR (EGFRwt) NSCLC; however, the application of ICI therapy to advanced EGFRm NSCLC patients is controversial. Early studies demonstrated the inferiority of ICI monotherapy to EGFR TKI therapy in the first line setting and inferiority to chemotherapy in the second line setting. Additionally, combination ICI and EGFR TKI therapies have demonstrated increased toxicities, and EGFR TKI therapy given after first-line ICI therapy has been correlated with severe adverse events. Nonetheless, combination therapies including dual-ICI blockade and ICI, chemotherapy, and angiogenesis inhibitor combinations are areas of active study with some intriguing signals in preliminary studies. Here, we review previous and ongoing clinical studies of ICI therapy in advanced EGFRm NSCLC. We discuss advances in understanding the differences in the tumor biology and tumor microenvironment (TME) of EGFRm NSCLC tumors that may lead to novel approaches to enhance ICI efficacy. It is our goal to equip the reader with a knowledge of current therapies, past and current clinical trials, and active avenues of research that provide the promise of novel approaches and improved outcomes for patients with advanced EGFRm NSCLC.

Impact of tumor programmed death ligand-1 expression on osimertinib efficacy in untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective observational study

Background

Osimertinib monotherapy is currently the standard of care as a first-line treatment for patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations; however, some EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients exhibit primary resistance and an insufficient response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Elevated programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumors was reported as a negative predictive factor for outcomes of first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs.

Methods

We prospectively assessed advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations who were treated with osimertinib at 14 institutions in Japan between September 2019 and December 2020. Relationships between outcomes of osimertinib monotherapy and patients’ characteristics were reviewed.

Results

Seventy-one patients who underwent the tumor PD-L1 test were enrolled. Multivariate analysis identified tumor PD-L1 expression as an independent predictor for progression-free survival (PFS) with osimertinib treatment (P=0.029). The objective-response and disease-control rates for osimertinib treatment were significantly lower in patients demonstrating elevated PD-L1 levels relative to those with low or negative PD-L1 level (P=0.043 and P=0.007, respectively). Furthermore, among patients treated with osimertinib, those with high PD-L1 levels exhibited shorter PFS relative to those with low plus negative PD-L1 level (median PFS: 5.0 vs. 17.4 months; P<0.001).

Conclusions

Elevated tumor PD-L1 expression is associated with poor outcomes of osimertinib monotherapy in previously untreated advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation. Further clinical trials are warranted to accumulate evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of combination therapy with osimertinib for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients with elevated tumor PD-L1 expression.

Trial Registration

UMIN000043942.

The predictive and prognostic effects of PD-L1 expression on TKI treatment and survival of EGFR-mutant NSCLC: A meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

Whether programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression could predict the outcome of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment and prognosis of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is remaining controversial.Potential studies were search from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Pooled odds ratio of objective response rate was used to describe the relationship between PD-L1 expression and primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were included to assess the effects of PD-L1 status on the outcome of EGFR-TKI treatment and survival of EGFR-mutant NSCLCs.Eighteen eligible studies (1986 EGFR-mutant NSCLCs) were included in this meta-analysis. Positive PD-L1 expression correlated with lower objective response rate of EGFR-TKI treatment (odds ratio [95% confidence interval {CI}] = 0.52 [0.28-0.98], P = .043), while PFS (adjusted HR [95% CI] = 1.49 [0.96-1.89], P = .332) and OS (HR [95% CI] = 1.24 [0.70-2.20], P = .456) of EGFR-TKI treatment did not correlated with PD-L1 status. Furthermore, PD-L1 expression was not a predictive biomarker for the OS (HR [95% CI] = 1.43 [0.98-2.08], P = .062) in overall EGFR-mutant cohort.Positive PD-L1 expression indicated a higher incidence of primary resistance, but did not correlate with the PFS or OS of EGFR-TKI therapy. In addition, PD-L1 expression was unlikely a predictive biomarker for prognosis of EGFR-mutant NSCLCs.

Successful management of lung adenocarcinoma with ALK/EGFR co-alterations and PD-L1 over-expression by bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)/epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) co-alterations in adenocarcinomas are rare and no therapeutic consensus is reached. The potentially negative prognostic effects of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs) efficacy further complicates the treatment options for patients with ALK/EGFR co-alterations and PD-L1 over-expression. We describe a case of advanced lung adenocarcinoma, harboring concurrent ALK/EGFR mutations and extremely high PD-L1 expression, that achieved sustained remission by the first-line treatment strategy of antiangiogenic therapy combined with chemotherapy. It is our firm conviction that the use anti-angiogenics should not have fallen out of favor in this era of targeted therapy and checkpoint inhibitors.

Anti-PD1/PD-L1 Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Actionable Oncogenic Driver Mutations

Anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy has emerged as a standard of care for stage III-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over the past decade. Patient selection is usually based on PD-L1 expression by tumor cells and/or tumor mutational burden. However, mutations in oncogenic drivers such as EGFR, ALK, BRAF, or MET modify the immune tumor microenvironment and may promote anti-PD1/PD-L1 resistance. In this review, we discuss the molecular mechanisms associated with these mutations, which shape the immune tumor microenvironment and may impede anti-PD1/PD-L1 efficacy. We provide an overview of the current clinical data on anti-PD1/PD-L1 efficacy in NSCLC with oncogenic driver mutation.

PD-L1 and CD47 co-expression predicts survival and enlightens future dual-targeting immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUD

Recent studies have indicated that programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cluster of differentiation 47 (CD47) play an essential role in tumor immune evasion and may serve as potential targets for combined immunotherapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the PD-L1/CD47 expression status in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), and explore its survival impact and relevance with the immune microenvironment.

METHODS

The specimens from 190 LUSC and 240 LUAD patients who underwent intent-to-treat surgeries were retrospectively collected for immunohistochemistry assays of PD-L1, CD47, cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8), and cluster of differentiation 68 (CD68).

RESULTS

A total of 96 (22.3%) and 296 (68.8%) cases were positive for PD-L1 and CD47 expression, respectively, and 80 (18.6%) of them demonstrated the co-expression of PD-L1/CD47. The rate of PD-L1/CD47 co-expression was 23.7% in LUSC, significantly higher than the 14.6% in LUAD (p = 0.018). The median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 55.9 months (range 2.0-146.0 months). The univariate analysis showed that patients with positive CD47 expression (LUSC p = 0.003, LUAD p = 0.036) and PD-L1/CD47 co-expression (LUSC p = 0.023, LUAD p = 0.004) exhibited significantly worse prognosis. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that PD-L1/CD47 co-expression was an independent prognostic factor for OS (LUSC hazard ratio [HR] 1.922, 95% CI 1.245-2.969, p = 0.003; LUAD HR 1.549, 95% CI 1.015-2.364, p = 0.043). PD-L1/CD47 co-expression was associated with high CD8-positive T-lymphocyte density in LUSC (p = 0.004) and LUAD (p = 0.043), and with high CD68-positive macrophage density in LUSC (p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1/CD47 co-expression was an independent prognostic factor for LUSC and LUAD patients and may serve as a potential predictive biomarker for combined dual-targeting immunotherapy.

Predictive value of pretreatment PD-L1 expression in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Objective

To investigate the predictive value of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs).

Methods

We conducted a systemic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 1 January 2000 to 30 August 2020, to identify related studies. We combined the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess the correlation of PD-L1 expression with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We assessed the quality of the included studies by the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). We performed subgroup analyses based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring system, IHC antibodies, sample size, countries, and survival analysis mode. Sensitivity analysis and evaluation of publication bias were also performed.

Results

Twelve studies including 991 patients met the criteria. The mean NOS score was 7.42 ± 1.19. Patients with high PD-L1 expression was associated with poorer PFS (HR = 1.90; 95% CI = 1.16–3.10; P = 0.011), while there was no association between PD-L1 expression and OS (HR = 1.19; 95% CI = 0.99–1.43; P = 0.070). Subgroup analysis prompted IHC scoring systems, IHC antibodies, and sample size have important effects on heterogeneity. The pooled results were robust according to the sensitivity analysis.

Conclusions

The result of this meta-analysis suggested that PD-L1 expression might be a predictive biomarker for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR-TKIs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02254-x.

Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy or Anlotinib vs. Pembrolizumab Alone in Patients With Previously Treated EGFR-Mutant NSCLC

Objectives

More and more encouraging evidence revealed that immunotherapy could improve clinical outcomes in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) variations. However, immunotherapy is still a controversy for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation.

Method

In this retrospective analysis, we compared the clinical efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy (PM), pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy (P+C) and pembrolizumab combined with anlotinib (P+A) in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation who had failed on EGFR-TKI and platinum-based chemotherapy.

Result

Eighty-six patients were included in this study. The overall median progression free survival (PFS) was 3.24 months. Multivariate analysis suggested that EGFR ^L858R and combined therapy were positive prognostic factors of PFS. The overall median OS was 12.28 months. Multivariate analysis found that high PD-L1 expression (≥50%) and combined therapy seemed to be positive prognostic factors of OS. Among the population, 32 patients received PM, 26 patients received P+C and 28 patients received P+A. Up to Jan 30, 2021, the median progression-free survival was 1.5 months in the PM group, 4.30 months in the P+C group and 3.24 months in the P+A group. The median OS were 7.41, 14.92 and 15.97 months, respectively. The ORR were 3.1%, 23.1% and 21.4%.

Conclusion

The addition of chemotherapy or antiangiogenic therapy to pembrolizumab resulted in significantly longer PFS, OS and ORR than pembrolizumab alone in our study. EGFR ^L858R might be a positive prognostic factor of PFS and high PD-L1 expression might be a positive prognostic factor of OS.

Association of Lung Adenocarcinoma Subtypes According to the IASLC/ATS/ERS Classification and Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression in Tumor Cells

Background: Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression is one of the most extensively studied biomarkers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is scarce information regarding its association with distinct adenocarcinoma subtypes. This study evaluated the frequency of PD-L1 expression according to the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification and other relevant histological and clinical features. Patients and Methods: PD-L1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). According to its positivity in tumor cells membrane, we stratified patients in three different tumor proportions score (TPS) cut-off points: a) <1% (negative), b) between 1 and 49%, and c) ≥50%; afterward, we analyzed the association among PD-L1 expression and lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) predominant subtypes, as well as other clinical features. As an exploratory outcome we evaluated if a PD-L1 TPS score ≥15% was useful as a biomarker for determining survival. Results: A total of 240 patients were included to our final analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 65 years (range 23-94 years). A PD-L1 TPS ≥1% was observed in 52.5% of the entire cohort; regarding specific predominant histological patterns, a PD-L1 TPS ≥1 was documented in 31.2% of patients with predominant-lepidic pattern, 46.2% of patients with predominant-acinar pattern, 42.8% of patients with a predominant-papillary pattern, and 68.7% of patients with predominant-solid pattern (p = 0.002). On the other hand, proportion of tumors with PD-L1 TPS ≥50% was not significantly different among adenocarcinoma subtypes. At the univariate survival analysis, a PD-L1 TPS cut-off value of ≥15% was associated with a worse PFS and OS. Conclusion: According to IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification, the predominant-solid pattern is associated with a higher proportion of PD-L1 positive samples, no subtype was identified to be associated with a high (≥50%) TPS PD-L1.

Recent Advancements in the Mechanisms Underlying Resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade Immunotherapy

Simple Summary

Immune checkpoint blockade targeting PD-1/PD-L1 has a promising therapeutic efficacy in different tumors, but a significant percentage of patients cannot benefit from this therapy due to primary and acquired resistance during treatment. This review summarizes the recent findings of PD-L1 role in resistance to therapies through the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and other correlating signaling pathways. A special focus will be given to the key mechanisms underlying resistance to the PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in cancer immunotherapy. Furthermore, we also discuss the promising combination of therapeutic strategies for patients resistant to the PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in order to enhance the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Abstract

Release of immunoreactive negative regulatory factors such as immune checkpoint limits antitumor responses. PD-L1 as a significant immunosuppressive factor has been involved in resistance to therapies such as chemotherapy and target therapy in various cancers. Via interacting with PD-1, PD-L1 can regulate other factors or lead to immune evasion of cancer cells. Besides, immune checkpoint blockade targeting PD-1/PD-L1 has promising therapeutic efficacy in the different tumors, but a significant percentage of patients cannot benefit from this therapy due to primary and acquired resistance during treatment. In this review, we described the utility of PD-L1 expression levels for predicting poor prognosis in some tumors and present evidence for a role of PD-L1 in resistance to therapies through PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and other correlating signaling pathways. Afterwards, we elaborate the key mechanisms underlying resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in cancer immunotherapy. Furthermore, promising combination of therapeutic strategies for patients resistant to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy or other therapies associated with PD-L1 expression was also summarized.

PD-L1 Expression in Chinese Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Multi-Center Retrospective Observational Study

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in Chinese patients with advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Tumor tissues with histologically confirmed stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were retrospectively obtained from 10 centers in China. PD-L1 expression was determined using the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and the samples were repetitively assayed with the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 Ab concentrate (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Results: Out of 901 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 879 (97.6%) had evaluable PD-L1 data. The number of patients with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) < 1%, 1-49%, and ≥ 50% (corresponding to PD-L1 non-expression, low expression, and high expression) was 424 (48.2%), 266 (30.3%), and 189 (21.5%), respectively. PD-L1 expression was more likely to be found in patients younger than 75 years, men, current or former smokers, those with good performance status (PS) scores, and those with a wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% and ≥ 1% were respectively 28.0% and 50.2% among patients negative for both EGFR mutation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement. PD-L1 expression determined using the 22C3 antibody concentrate and pharmDx kit had comparable results. Conclusions: The prevalence of PD‑L1 expression in advanced NSCLC was consistent with that reported in the global EXPRESS study. Age, gender, smoking history, PS scores, and EGFR/ALK mutation status affected PD-L1 expression. The 22C3 antibody concentrate appears to be an alternative reagent for the PD-L1 assay.

Concurrent Genetic Alterations and Other Biomarkers Predict Treatment Efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) greatly improve the survival and quality of life of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations. However, many patients exhibit de novo or primary/early resistance. In addition, patients who initially respond to EGFR-TKIs exhibit marked diversity in clinical outcomes. With the development of comprehensive genomic profiling, various mutations and concurrent (i.e., coexisting) genetic alterations have been discovered. Many studies have revealed that concurrent genetic alterations play an important role in the response and resistance of EGFR-mutant NSCLC to EGFR-TKIs. To optimize clinical outcomes, a better understanding of specific concurrent gene alterations and their impact on EGFR-TKI treatment efficacy is necessary. Further exploration of other biomarkers that can predict EGFR-TKI efficacy will help clinicians identify patients who may not respond to TKIs and allow them to choose appropriate treatment strategies. Here, we review the literature on specific gene alterations that coexist with EGFR mutations, including common alterations (intra-EGFR [on target] co-mutation, TP53, PIK3CA, and PTEN) and driver gene alterations (ALK, KRAS, ROS1, and MET). We also summarize data for other biomarkers (e.g., PD-L1 expression and BIM polymorphisms) associated with EGFR-TKI efficacy.

Impact of programmed death-ligand 1 expression on the patients of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To determine the impact of programed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes in stage IV epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We searched biomedical databases for studies comparing PFS outcomes of PD-L1-positive versus (vs) PD-L1-negative tumors. We assessed the methodological quality of eligible studies using ROBINS-I tool. We employed a two-staged meta-analysis approach by reconstructing individual patient data of each study from the published Kaplan-Meier curves and then pooling the individual hazard ratios (HRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) for restricted mean PFS time at 6 (RMPFST6) and 12 (RMPFST12) months using random-effect models. We assessed the quality of summarized evidence using GRADE approach.

RESULTS

We identified five non-randomized comparative studies including 435 patients. The overall risk of bias in the methodological quality of included studies was moderate. PD-L1-positive tumors were associated with significantly worse PFS outcomes compared to PD-L1-negative tumors (HR: 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.59-3.66, p < .001; WMD in RMPFST6: -1.01, 95% CI: -1.65 to -0.37, p = .002; WMD in RMPFST12: -2.64, 95% CI: -4.40 to -0.88, p = .003). Subgroup analysis showed that the effect of PD-L1 expression on PFS outcomes was greater for studies using older-generation rather than third-generation TKIs (HR: 2.69 vs 1.22, p = .069; WMD in RMPFST6: -1.23 vs -0.07, p = .005; WMD in RMPFST12: -3.29 vs -0.12, p = .003). The quality of summarized evidence was judged to be low.

CONCLUSION

There is low certainty in the evidence to suggest that positive PD-L1 expression is associated with inferior disease control and survival outcomes in patients with stage IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated with first-line EGFR TKIs.

Clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint blockades and the underlying immune escape mechanisms in squamous and adenocarcinoma NSCLC

Immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs) have changed the standard of care of squamous and adenocarcinoma non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whereas detailed researches regarding ICBs in the two major histological subtypes are rare. In order to uncover the clinical efficacy differences between squamous and adenocarcinoma NSCLC and better understand the underlying immune‐regulatory mechanisms, we compared the survival benefits of ICBs between the two subtypes by revealing phase 3 randomized trials and attempted to uncover the immune‐regulatory discrepancy. Generally, compared with nonsquamous NSCLC, squamous NSCLC benefited more from ICBs in Keynote 024, CheckMate 026, CheckMate 227 and CheckMate 017 and similar in OAK, but less in Keynote 010 and PACIFIC. We revealed that the tumor mutation burden (TMB) level, the programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the tumor microenvironment (TME), chemokines, and oncogenic driver alterations within the two subtypes may contributed to the clinical outcomes of ICBs. We prospected that the combinations of ICBs with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and antiangiogenic therapy could be promising strategies to re‐immunize the less immunogenic tumors and further enhance the efficacy of ICBs.

Clinicopathological and molecular characteristics associated with PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: a large-scale, multi-center, real-world study in China

PURPOSE

The study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological and molecular profiles associated with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in non-small cell lung cell (NSCLC) in a large-scale, multi-center, real-world Chinese cohort.

METHODS

A total of 6295 NSCLC specimens from six centers in China were analyzed by PD-L1 (22C3) assay. PD-L1 expression in tumor cells (TCs) was classified as negative (TPS expression in < 1% of TCs), low (TPS in 1-49% of TCs), or high (TPS in ≥ 50% of TCs). The status of EGFR mutation was determined by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction or next-generation sequencing, and ALK and ROS1 translocation was analyzed by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Associations of PD-L1 expression with clinicopathological features and driver mutations were analyzed.

RESULTS

Positive PD-L1 expression was more frequently seen in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and other histological types of NSCLC compared to adenocarcinoma (AC). In AC, PD-L1 expression was associated with gender, histological type, metastatic status, and pathological features of lymphovascular invasion and visceral pleural invasion. Solid and micropapillary subtypes of AC were more likely to have positive PD-L1 expression compared to other subtypes. PD-L1 was more highly expressed in biopsy samples than in resected samples, and in metastatic samples compared with primary tissues. PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with wild-type EGFR and ALK translocations.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 expression in NSCLC is linked to histological type, pathological features, and driver mutation status, which has meaningful implications for clinical practice.

PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Comparability and Their Correlation with Clinical Characteristics in NSCLC

Background

PD-L1 expression is an important predictive factor of response to therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study was designed to retrospectively analyze the concordance of PD-L1 measurements using three different assays (Dako22C3, Dako28-8, and SP142) in NSCLC patients and to find possible predictors of high PD-L1 expression.

Materials and Methods

Data of 144 patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC and available PD-L1 measurements treated at the Taoyuan General Hospital from 2018 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed in the study. Patients' characteristics, including age, sex, clinical stage (T, N, and M) of NSCLC (AJCC, 8^th edition), and EGFR/ALK alterations, were analyzed for association with PD-L1 expression.

Results

Measurements of PD-L1 expression levels with Dako22C3 and Dako28-8 were comparable while SP142 showed lower levels of PD-L1 expression. The overall agreement between Dako22C3 and Dako28-8 was 82.2% and 91.6% for both 1% and 50% TPS cut-offs, respectively. The above findings were confirmed by Cohen's kappa. In addition, we found that PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with advanced N stage but not with T and M stages.

Conclusion

Dako22C3 and Dako28-8 showed comparable results in assessing PD-L1 levels. Future prospective studies are needed to validate these findings. N stage may be a good predictor for PD-L1 expression.

Prognostic implications of programmed death ligand 1 expression in resected lung adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Conflicting results have been reported about the prognostic value of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein and gene expression in lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive online search to explore the association between PD-L1 expression (protein and messenger RNA) and overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival. Outcomes also included pooled rates of high PD-L1 protein expression in different cell types, per threshold used and per antibody used. A pooled gene expression analysis was also performed on 3 transcriptomic data sets that were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas database and the Gene Expression Omnibus database.

RESULTS

A total of 6488 patients from 25 studies were included. The pooled results suggested that high PD-L1 expression was associated with shorter OS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.57; P < 0.001] and disease-free survival (HR 1.341; P = 0.037) in the overall population. The overall pooled rate of high PD-L1 protein expression was 29% (95% confidence interval 23-34%) in tumour cells. In subgroup analysis, high PD-L1 protein expression in tumour cells predicted worse OS and disease-free survival. A pooled analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus data sets revealed that higher levels of PD-L1 messenger RNA predicted poorer OS in the entire population.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is, to our knowledge, the largest pooled analysis on the subject to shed light on the high expression rate of PD-L1 and the prognostic value of high PD-L1 expression in resected lung adenocarcinomas. PD-L1 gene expression is a promising prognostic factor for patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma. Standardization of staining should be underscored prior to routine implementation.

Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Expression in Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Recently, anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapies have yielded promising outcomes for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and led to great interest in applying these agents to treat resectable early-stage NSCLC. The objective of our study was to evaluate PD-L1 protein expression in resectable early-stage NSCLC specimens from a large Northern European cohort, examine the relationship to clinical characteristics, and demonstrate the prognostic role in resected NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A large cohort of 875 NSCLC tumors consisted of 337 patients from Sweden and 538 patients from Norway was studied. All the patients had undergone pulmonary resection, and most patients had had early-stage NSCLC. PD-L1 protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry using the Dako PD-L1 22C3 pharmDx kit. The tumor proportion score for PD-L1 protein expression was compared with comprehensive demographic and clinicopathologic data.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of PD-L1 protein expression in the resectable NSCLC cohort was 9.5% at a tumor proportion score cutoff of ≥ 50%. Stage I NSCLC had lower PD-L1 expression compared with that of the other stages (P = .0012). PD-L1 expression correlated with wild-type EGFR gene expression (P = .0156) and mutated KRAS gene expression (P = .0004). No significant association was found between PD-L1 expression and mortality after multivariable adjustment for clinical characteristics, although the survival curves showed PD-L1 expression significantly correlated with a poor prognosis in the total NSCLC cohort and in the adenocarcinoma subgroup.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression in the present large cohort of resectable NSCLC was relatively low compared with data from clinical trials of advanced NSCLC. PD-L1 expression correlated positively with tumor stage, wild-type EGFR, and KRAS mutation. PD-L1 expression was not found as an independent prognostic factor in the present study. These findings could be important in the future when evaluating the role of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in the setting of neoadjuvant or adjuvant trials for early-stage resectable NSCLC.

m6A RNA Methylation Regulators Participate in the Malignant Progression and Have Clinical Prognostic Value in Lung Adenocarcinoma

Abnormal methylation of N6 adenosine (m6A) in RNA plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of many types of tumors. However, little is known about m6A RNA methylation in lung adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to identify the value of m6A RNA methylation regulators in the malignant progression and clinical prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma. The RNA-seq transcriptome data and corresponding clinical information of lung adenocarcinoma were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) database. Then the identification of differentially expressed m6A RNA methylation regulators between cancer samples and normal control samples, different subgroups by consensus expression of these regulators and the prognostic signature were achieved using R software with multiple corresponding packages. The results showed that the expression levels of HNRNPC, YTHDF1, KIAA1429, RBM15, YTHDF2, and METTL3 in cancer group were significantly up-regulated (P < 0.05), while expression levels of FTO, ZC3H13, METTL14, YTHDC1 and WTAP in cancer group were significantly down-regulated (P < 0.05) compared with control group. Two subgroups identified by consensus expression of these regulators were closely related to the clinicopathological features, clinical outcomes and malignancy of lung adenocarcinoma. In addition, a 3-gene risk signature including KIAA1429, RBM15, and HNRNPC was constructed and the lung adenocarcinoma patients in TCGA database were divided into high-risk group and low-risk group based on the median risk score. In conclusion, the prognostic signature-based risk score calculated according to the expression levels of KIAA1429, RBM15, and HNRNPC, was not only strongly associated with clinical outcomes and clinicopathological features, but also an independent prognostic factor in lung adenocarcinoma.

High PD-L1 Expression is Associated with Unfavorable Clinical Outcome in EGFR-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinomas Treated with Targeted Therapy

Purpose

Although programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is widely accepted as a predictive and prognostic biomarker in immunotherapy, its implications in lung cancer patients with driving mutations are still unclear. The objective of this study is to determine the association between PD-L1 expression and treatment outcome in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung cancer treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled EGFR-mutant, advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who received first-line EGFR-TKIs and evaluated the PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) using the 22C3 pharmDx assay. We investigated the distribution of patients with different PD-L1 TPS values, followed by the analysis of response rate (RR), survival rate, and incidence of secondary T790M mutation according to the PD-L1 TPS group.

Results

Among the 131 patients analyzed, the proportion of patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%, 1–49%, and <1%, was 17.6%, 32.8%, and 49.6%, respectively. The RR was significantly lower in the group with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% than in the other groups (43.5% vs 72.1% vs 78.5%, all p = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% was independently associated with a significantly shorter PFS in the overall population (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.64, p = 0.004) and associated with shorter OS in patients with exon 19 deletion (HR = 2.55, p = 0.041) compared with PD-L1 TPS < 50%. In addition, the frequency of secondary T790M mutation after TKI failure was significantly lower in the group with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% than in the other groups (13.3% vs 40.0% vs 53.3%, all p = 0.001). PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% was an independent predictor of a lower frequency of this mutation (HR = 0.63, p = 0.043).

Conclusion

High PD-L1 expression was associated with unfavorable clinical outcome and less development of secondary T790M mutation, suggesting a distinct subgroup warranting active surveillance and tailored therapeutic approach.

Optimal Management of Patients with Advanced NSCLC Harboring High PD-L1 Expression and Driver Mutations

OPINION STATEMENT

Patients with stage IV or recurrent/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors harbor high PD-L1 expression and driver mutations with approved targeted treatments (EGFR, ALK, BRAF^V600E, ROS1) should receive initial therapy with targeted therapy based on impressive clinical activity. PD-(L)1 inhibitors have demonstrated minimal activity in many driver mutation subsets including EGFR and ALK and appears to have more benefit in smoking-associated oncogenic drivers (KRAS, BRAF). For KRAS-driven tumors, co-mutations such as STK11/LKB1 are negative predictive markers of immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Therefore, driver mutations need to be evaluated before pursuing immunotherapy independent of PD-L1 expression level. Caution should be used with TKIs following or concurrent with immunotherapy owing to potentially increased toxicity. New immunotherapy combinations are needed especially for oncogene-driven tumors associated with never or light smoking history.

A case of ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma with osteoblastic bone metastasis

A 53-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for detailed examination of abnormal chest shadows recognized on CT imaging. Transbronchial lung biopsy of a right S6 nodular shadow led to a diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma. FDG-PET-CT showed FDG accumulation in the Th11 and L2 vertebral bodies and osteoblastic bone lesions. Since osteoblastic bone metastasis in lung cancer is extremely rare, CT-guided bone biopsy was performed. The tumor was diagnosed as ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma, for which crizotinib was administered, which led to improvement of both the primary and metastatic lesions. We report here a rare case of ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma with osteoblastic bone metastasis of lung cancer.

Association of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression with Fusion Variants and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma Receiving Crizotinib

BACKGROUND

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is associated with clinical outcomes of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, whether PD-L1 expression plays a role in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung ADC is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the impact of PD-L1 in patients with ALK-positive lung ADC receiving crizotinib.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PD-L1 expression was identified by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction was used for ALK variant detection, and immunofluorescence-based multiplex staining was applied for exploring immune cells in tumor microenvironments.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients with ALK-positive advanced ADC were enrolled in our study, of whom 52 received crizotinib. Compared with EGFR/ALK wild-type tumors, PD-L1 expression was lower in ALK-positive ADC. ALK fusion variants were identified in 32 patients, and those with variant 3 and 5 (short variants) had higher PD-L1 expression than those with other variants. The crizotinib objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) was better in tumors with negative PD-L1 expression (ORR/PFS in PD-L1 0% vs. 1%-49% vs. 50%-100%: 60.7%/11.8 months vs. 38.5%/6.5 months vs. 36.4%/4.0 months, p = .007/.022). The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that PD-L1 0% (vs. ≥1%) was an independent factor for longer PFS (adjusted hazard ratio 0.322, 95% confidence interval 0.160-0.650, p = .002). Multiplex IHC in three cases showed a varied extent of immune cell infiltrations in tumors with different PD-L1 expression.

CONCLUSION

Positive PD-L1 expression was associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes in patients with ALK-positive lung ADC receiving crizotinib.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Not all lung adenocarcinoma with sensitizing driver mutations experienced durable responses to small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Similar to the negative impact of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in epidermal growth factor receptor mutant tumors treated with TKIs, this study demonstrated that positive PD-L1 expression was also associated with worse response rate and shorter progression-free survival of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive adenocarcinoma treated with crizotinib. Among different ALK fusion partners, tumors with short variants (V3 and V5) had higher PD-L1 compared with long variants (V1, V2, and V6). Testing PD-L1 before initiating crizotinib for ALK-positive lung cancer could be a simple method to provide important prognostic information.