Survival outcomes and symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastasis in EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer without baseline CNS metastasis: Osimertinib vs. first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Osimertinib is associated with improved outcomes in pre-treated non-small cell lung cancer leptomeningeal metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysiss

Purpose

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a severe complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In patients with NSCLC LM harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, osimertinib is favored over alternative EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the efficacy of osimertinib relative to other EGFR-TKIs is not well established for patients with LM. We aimed to compare the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutated NSCLC LM.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis performed according to PRISMA guidelines included studies of adult patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and a diagnosis of LM who received an EGFR-TKI for the treatment of LM. We searched Medline ALL, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. The evaluation of biases was done by using the Ottawa-Newscastle scale. The hazard ratio was used as the parameter of interest for overall survival (OS) and central nervous system-specific progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

128 publications were included with 243 patients and 282 lines of EGFR-TKI for NSCLC LM that met inclusion criteria. The median PFS in patients receiving any EGFR-TKI was 9.1 months, and the median OS was 14.5 months. In univariate analyses of the entire cohort, osimertinib treatment demonstrated significantly prolonged PFS, but not OS, compared to other EGFR-TKIs. Osimertinib demonstrated significantly prolonged PFS and OS in the subset of patients who were previously treated with EGFR-TKIs, but not in EGFR-TKI naïve patients.

Conclusion

Osimertinib is associated with improved outcomes compared to other EGFR-TKIs, particularly in patients previously treated with EGFR-TKIs. An important limitation is that most patients were derived from retrospective reports. These results highlight the need for prospective studies for this difficult-to-treat patient population.

Optimal sequence of LT for symptomatic BM in EGFR-mutant NSCLC: a comparative study of first-line EGFR-TKIs with/without upfront LT

BACKGROUND

The third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) can penetrate blood-brain barrier and are effective for brain metastases (BMs). There is no consensus on the optimal sequence of local therapy (LT) and EGFR-TKIs for symptomatic BM patients because patients suffering neurological symptoms were not enrolled in most clinical trials.

METHODS

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation (EGFRm) and symptomatic BM receiving first-line osimertinib and aumolertinib from two medical centers were collected. All participants were allocated into the third-generation EGFR-TKIs (TKIs) group and the upfront LT (uLT) plus third-generation EGFR-TKIs (TKIs + uLT) group. Demographic data, survival outcomes, treatment failure patterns, and adverse events were evaluated between the two groups. We also conducted subgroup analyses to explore the impact of BM number on survival outcomes.

RESULTS

86 patients were enrolled, 44 in the TKIs group and 42 in the TKIs + uLT group. There were no significant differences in the short-term response between the groups. TKIs + uLT was associated with significantly longer overall survival (OS) (43 vs. 28 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.77; p = .011). No differences in progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS (iPFS), failure patterns, or safety were observed. In subgroup analyses of oligo-BM patients, TKIs + uLT could prolong OS (43 vs. 31 months; HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05-0.92; p = .015).

CONCLUSIONS

EGFRm NSCLC patients with symptomatic BM might benefit from uLT, particularly oligo-BM patients. However, larger prospective cohort studies should be carried out to confirm the responses of the TKIs + uLT scheme.

Measured Steps: Navigating the Path of Oligoprogressive Lung Cancer with Targeted and Immunotherapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review discusses the definitions, treatment modalities, management, future directions, and ongoing clinical trials of oligoprogressive disease in oncogene-driven and non-oncogene-driven NSCLC.

RECENT FINDINGS

During the last decades, diagnostic and treatment modalities for oligometastatic NSCLC have advanced significantly, leading to improved survival. Additionally, our understanding of the tumor biology of oligoprogressive disease has expanded. However, despite the efforts of organizations, such as EORTC, ESTRO, and ASTRO proposing definitions for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease, heterogeneity in definitions persists in (ongoing) trials. Recognizing the significance of subclassification within oligoprogressive disease in NSCLC and the varying risks associated with subsequent metastatic spread, there is a call for tailored management strategies. A consensus on standardized criteria for the definition of oligoprogressive disease is urgently needed and will not only facilitate meaningful comparisons between studies but also pave the way for the development of personalized treatment plans that take into account the heterogeneous nature of oligoprogressive disease.

First report of furmonertinib as a first-line treatment in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations after the kinase domain αC-helix: Two case reports and a literature review

RATIONALE

Many studies have shown that first- and second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors are less effective in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations. The efficacy of third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors is still under investigation. Although new targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibody-based agents have made significant advances in the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion (EGFR ex20ins) mutation, the efficacy of these novel agents is not quite satisfactory. Platinum- and pemetrexed-based chemotherapy remains the standard first-line treatment for patients harboring EGFR ex20ins mutation.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We report for the first time 2 Chinese patients diagnosed with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR ex20ins mutations after analysis of the αC-helix sequence by next-generation sequencing. Both patients were treated with furmonertinib as the first-line therapy.

INTERVENTIONS

The first case included a 38-year-old female who had an EGFR ex20ins mutation (p.S768_D770dupSVD). After 1 month of treatment with furmonertinib, her symptoms of pain and cough were significantly alleviated. She achieved a partial response according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors.[1] The final progression-free survival was 8.13 months. The second case included a 40-year-old male who had an EGFR ex20ins mutation (p.N771_P772insVal). He had a good response to furmonertinib and exhibited stable disease according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors with a progression-free survival of 10.90 months.

OUTCOMES

Both patients experienced significant improvement in symptoms and prolonged survival after furmonertinib was used as first-line treatment. Side effects were limited but manageable.

CONCLUSION

The present study indicates that furmonertinib may be a first-line treatment option for patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR ex20ins mutation.

Harnessing immunotherapy for brain metastases: insights into tumor-brain microenvironment interactions and emerging treatment modalities

Brain metastases signify a deleterious milestone in the progression of several advanced cancers, predominantly originating from lung, breast and melanoma malignancies, with a median survival timeframe nearing six months. Existing therapeutic regimens yield suboptimal outcomes; however, burgeoning insights into the tumor microenvironment, particularly the immunosuppressive milieu engendered by tumor-brain interplay, posit immunotherapy as a promising avenue for ameliorating brain metastases. In this review, we meticulously delineate the research advancements concerning the microenvironment of brain metastases, striving to elucidate the panorama of their onset and evolution. We encapsulate three emergent immunotherapeutic strategies, namely immune checkpoint inhibition, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell transplantation and glial cell-targeted immunoenhancement. We underscore the imperative of aligning immunotherapy development with in-depth understanding of the tumor microenvironment and engendering innovative delivery platforms. Moreover, the integration with established or avant-garde physical methodologies and localized applications warrants consideration in the prevailing therapeutic schema.

Brain metastasis, EGFR mutation subtype and generation of EGFR-TKI jointly influence the treatment outcome of patient with EGFR-mutant NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is brain metastasis (BM)-prone. We determined the impact of this hallmark, along with EGFR subtype and generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment, on patients' outcome. 553 metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients received front-line EGFR-TKI treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M rate were analysed. BM was observed in 211 (38.2%) patients. BM (HR 1.20 [95% CI 0.99-1.48]; p = 0.053), ECOG PS 0-1 (HR 0.71 [95% CI 0.54-0.93]; p = 0.014) and afatinib treatment (HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.66-0.99]; p = 0.045) were associated with PFS. Afatinib-treated patients without BM demonstrated a significantly longer PFS (16.3 months) compared to afatinib-treated patients with BM (13.7 months) and to gefitinib/erlotinib-treated patients with (11.1 months) or without BM (14.2 months; p < 0.001). CNS-only progression trended higher in afatinib-treated patients. ECOG PS 0-1 (HR 0.41 [95% CI 0.31-0.56]; p < 0.001) and EGFR L858R mutation (HR 1.46 [95% CI 1.13-1.88]; p = 0.003), but not BM, were the predictors for OS. BM (OR 2.02 [95% CI 1.02-4.08]; p = 0.040), afatinib treatment (OR 0.26 [95% CI 0.12-0.50]; p < 0.001) and EGFR L858R mutation (OR 0.55 [95% CI 0.28-1.05]; p = 0.070) were associated with secondary T790M rate. In BM patients, gefitinib/erlotinib-treated ones with 19 deletion mutation and afatinib-treated ones with L858R mutation had the highest and the lowest T790M rate (94.4% vs. 27.3%, p < 0.001), respectively. BM and generation of EGFR-TKI jointly impact PFS and secondary T790M rate in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, whereas OS was mainly associated with EGFR subtype.

First- versus Third-Generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases

Introduction: Up to 50% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbor EGFR alterations, the most common etiology behind brain metastases (BMs). First-generation EGFR-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) are limited by blood-brain barrier penetration and T790M tumor mutations, wherein third-generation EGFR-TKIs, like Osimertinib, have shown greater activity. However, their efficacy has not been well-studied in later therapy lines in NSCLC patients with BMs (NSCLC-BM). We sought to compare outcomes of NSCLC-BM treated with either first- or third-generation EGFR-TKIs in first-line and 2nd-to-5th-line settings. Methods: A retrospective review of NSCLC-BM patients diagnosed during 2010-2019 at Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, US, a quaternary-care center, was performed and reported following 'strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology' (STROBE) guidelines. Data regarding socio-demographic, histopathological, molecular characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. Primary outcomes were median overall survival (mOS) and progression-free survival (mPFS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling and propensity score matching were utilized to adjust for confounders. Results: 239 NSCLC-BM patients with EGFR alterations were identified, of which 107 received EGFR-TKIs after diagnosis of BMs. 77.6% (83/107) received it as first-line treatment, and 30.8% (33/107) received it in later (2nd-5th) lines of therapy, with nine patients receiving it in both settings. 64 of 107 patients received first-generation (erlotinib/gefitinib) TKIs, with 53 receiving them in the first line setting and 13 receiving it in the 2nd-5th lines of therapy. 50 patients received Osimertinib as third-generation EGFR-TKI, 30 in first-line, and 20 in the 2nd-5th lines of therapy. Univariable analysis in first-line therapy demonstrated mOS of first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs as 18.2 and 19.4 months, respectively (p = 0.57), while unadjusted mPFS of first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs was 9.3 and 13.8 months, respectively (p = 0.14). In 2nd-5th line therapy, for first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs, mOS was 17.3 and 11.9 months, (p = 0.19), while mPFS was 10.4 and 6.08 months, respectively (p = 0.41). After adjusting for age, performance status, presence of extracranial metastases, whole-brain radiotherapy, and presence of leptomeningeal metastases, hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 1.25 (95% CI 0.63-2.49, p = 0.52) for first-line therapy. Adjusted HR for mOS in 2nd-to-5th line therapy was 1.60 (95% CI 0.55-4.69, p = 0.39). Conclusions: No difference in survival was detected between first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs in either first or 2nd-to-5th lines of therapy. Larger prospective studies are warranted reporting intracranial lesion size, EGFR alteration and expression levels in primary tumor and brain metastases, and response rates.

A "Seed-and-Soil" Radiomics Model Predicts Brain Metastasis Development in Lung Cancer: Implications for Risk-Stratified Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation

Introduction: Brain is a major site of metastasis for lung cancer, and effective therapy for developed brain metastasis (BM) is limited. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been shown to reduce BM rate and improve survival in small cell lung cancer, but this result was not replicated in unselected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and had the risk of inducing neurocognitive dysfunctions. We aimed to develop a radiomics BM prediction model for BM risk stratification in NSCLC patients. Methods: 256 NSCLC patients with no BM at baseline brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were selected; 128 patients developed BM within three years after diagnosis and 128 remained BM-free. For radiomics analysis, both the BM and non-BM groups were randomly distributed into training and testing datasets at an 70%:30% ratio. Both brain MRI (representing the soil) and chest computed tomography (CT, representing the seed) radiomic features were extracted to develop the BM prediction models. We first developed the radiomic models using the training dataset (89 non-BM and 90 BM cases) and subsequently validated the models in the testing dataset (39 non-BM and 38 BM cases). A radiomics BM score (RadBM score) was generated, and BM-free survival were compared between RadBM score-high and RadBM score-low groups. Results: The radiomics model developed from baseline brain MRI features alone can predict BM development in NSCLC patients. A fusion model integrating brain MRI features with primary tumor CT features (seed-and-soil model) provided synergetic effect and was more efficient in predicting BM (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.80−0.89) and 0.80 (95% confidence interval: 0.71−0.88) in the training and testing datasets, respectively). BM-free survival was significantly shorter in the RadBM score-high group versus the RadBM score-low group (Log-rank, p < 0.001). Hazard ratios for BM were 1.056 (95% confidence interval: 1.044−1.068) per 0.01 increment in RadBM score. Cumulative BM rates at three years were 75.8% and 24.2% for the RadBM score-high and RadBM score-low groups, respectively. Only 1.2% (7/565) of the BM lesions were located within the hippocampal avoidance region. Conclusion: The results demonstrated that intrinsic features of a non-metastatic brain exert a significant impact on BM development, which is first-in-class in metastasis prediction studies. A radiomics BM prediction model utilizing both primary tumor and pre-metastatic brain features might provide a useful tool for individualized PCI administration in NSCLC patients more prone to develop BM.

Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer

Studies have revealed that non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has a high incidence of brain metastases (BMs). However, the association between EGFR mutations and BMs remains unknown. This review summarizes detailed information about the incidence of BMs, clinical and imaging characteristics of BMs, brain surveillance strategies, influence of treatments on BMs, prognosis after BMs, and differences in EGFR mutations between paired primary tumors and BMs in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The prognostic results demonstrate that patients with mutated EGFR have a higher incidence of BMs, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) (afatinib and osimertinib) delay the development of BMs, and patients with mutated EGFR with synchronous or early BMs have better overall survival after BMs than those with wild-type EGFR. The EGFR mutation status of BM sites is not always in accordance with the primary tumors, which indicates that there is heterogeneity in EGFR gene status between paired primary tumors and BMs. However, the EGFR gene status of the primary site can largely represent that of BM sites. Among patients developing synchronous BMs, patients with mutated EGFR are less likely to have central nervous system (CNS) symptoms than patients with wild-type EGFR. However, the possibility of neuro-symptoms is high in patients with metachronous BMs. Patients with mutated EGFR tend to have multiple BMs as compared to patients with wild-type EGFR. Regarding very early-stage NSCLC patients without neuro-symptoms, regular neuroimaging follow-up is not recommended. Among advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation, liberal brain imaging follow-up in the first several years showed more advantages in terms of cost.

Efficacy and safety of osimertinib for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib is a recently approved third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and EGFR-T790M resistance mutations. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Databases were searched for randomized controlled studies that reported the efficacy and safety of osimertinib versus other treatments (chemotherapy, other EGFR-TKIs, etc.) in treating EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The measured effects included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), central nervous system progression-free survival (CNS-PFS), and overall survival (OS). Additional outcome was the incidence of adverse event. Relative risk (RR) for incidence and hazard ratio (HR) for survival outcomes were pooled.

RESULTS

Seven studies containing 3335 participants were finally included. Osimertinib tended to improve ORR and DCR (RRs >1) as compared with other treatments. Osimertinib was also a significant protective factor for PFS, CNS-PFS, and OS (HRs <1 and p < .05). Osimertinib showed similar advantages in improving tumor response and patient survival when used as first-line, second-line, and third-line/adjuvant therapy, respectively, as compared with other treatments (RRs >1 for ORR and DCR; HRs <1 for PFS, CNS-PFS, and OS). Osimertinib also had better therapeutic effects as compared with chemotherapy, other EGFR TKIs, docetaxel + bevacizumab, and placebo, respectively. The five most common adverse events with pooled incidence > 20% were diarrhea, rash, nail effects, dry skin, and stomatitis, yet the pooled incidence of serious adverse events was less than 2%.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that osimertinib has a positive effect in disease control and survival for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC with acceptable toxicities.

Overall survival benefit of Osimertinib and clinical value of upfront cranial local therapy in untreated EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastasis

Osimertinib, as a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), showed more potent efficacy against brain metastasis (BM) in untreated EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the FLAURA study. However, the overall survival (OS) benefit of Osimertinib and clinical value of cranial local therapy (CLT) in these patients remain undetermined. Here we conducted a retrospective study involving untreated EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with BMs receiving first-line osimertinib or first-generation EGFR-TKIs. Upfront CLT was defined as CLT performed before disease progression to the first-line EGFR-TKIs. Pattern of treatment failure and survival outcomes were extensively investigated. Among the 367 patients enrolled, first-generation EGFR-TKI was administered in 265, osimertinib in 102 and upfront CLT performed in 140. Patients receiving osimertinib had more (p<0.001) and larger BMs (p=0.003) than those receiving first-generation EGFR-TKIs. After propensity score matching (PSM), osimertinib was found to prolong OS (37.7 months vs. 22.2 months, p=0.027). Pattern of failure analyses found that 51.8% of the patients without upfront CLT developed their initial progressive disease (PD) in the brain and 59.0% of the cranial PD occurred at the original sites alone, suggesting potential clinical value of upfront CLT. Indeed, upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and/or surgery was associated with improved OS among those receiving first-generation EGFR-TKIs (p=0.019) and those receiving osimertinib (p=0.041). In summary, compared with first-generation EGFR-TKIs, osimertinib is associated with improved OS in untreated EGFR-mutant NSCLC with BMs. Meanwhile, upfront SRS and/or surgery may provide extra survival benefit, which needs to be verified in future studies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Association between oligo-residual disease and patterns of failure during EGFR-TKI treatment in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Local ablative therapy (LAT) may be beneficial for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with oligo-residual disease after treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). However, this has not been fully established. This study aimed to evaluate the predominant progressive disease (PD) pattern limited to residual sites of disease after treatment with EGFR-TKI.

METHODS

Patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKIs as first-line therapy were retrospectively analysed during a 7-year period. Oligo-residual disease was defined as the presence of 1 - 4 lesions (including the primary site) at 3 months from the start of EGFR-TKI treatment. The predictive factors of PD patterns after EGFR-TKI treatment were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 207 patients were included. Three months after the start of EGFR-TKI treatment, 66 patients (32%) had oligo-residual disease. A total of 191 patients had PD, 60 with oligo-residual disease and 131 with non-oligo-residual disease. Regarding the pattern, 44 patients (73%) with oligo-residual disease and 37 patients (28%) with non-oligo-residual disease had PD limited to the residual sites. Multivariate logistic regression analysis at 3 months from the start of EGFR-TKI treatment revealed that oligo-residual disease (P < 0.001), the lack of residual central nervous system metastases (P = 0.032), and initial treatment with osimertinib (P = 0.028) were independent predictors of PD limited to residual disease sites.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided a rationale for LAT to all sites of residual disease in patients with oligo-residual disease during EGFR-TKI treatment.

Value and significance of brain radiation therapy during first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR sensitive mutation and synchronous brain metastasis: Appropriate timing and technique

Background

For lung adenocarcinoma patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) sensitive mutation and synchronous brain metastasis (syn‐BM), when and how to apply radiotherapy (RT) during first‐line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment remains debatable.

Methods

From a real‐world multicenter database, EGFR‐mutant patients with syn‐BM diagnosed between 2010–2020 and treated with first‐line TKIs were enrolled and divided into upfront TKI + RT and upfront TKI groups. Median intracranial progression‐free survival (mIC‐PFS), median overall survival (mOS), and their risk factors were estimated.

Results

There were 60 and 186 patients in the upfront TKI + RT group and upfront TKI group, respectively. Their mIC‐PFS were 28.9 months (m) and 17.5 m (p = 0.023), and mOS were 42.7 m and 40.1 m (p = 0.51). Upfront brain RT improved mIC‐PFS in patients ≤60‐year‐old (p = 0.035), with symptomatic BM (p = 0.002), and treated with first‐generation TKIs (p = 0.012). There was no significant difference in mOS in any subgroup. Upfront brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) showed a trend of better mIC‐PFS and mOS. mIC‐PFS was independently correlated with symptomatic BM (HR = 1.54, p = 0.030), EGFR L858R mutation (HR = 1.57, p = 0.019), and upfront brain RT (HR = 0.47, p = 0.001). mOS was independently correlated with being female (HR = 0.54, p = 0.007), ECOG 3–4 (HR = 10.47, p < 0.001), BM number>3 (HR = 2.19, p = 0.002), and third‐generation TKI (HR = 0.54, p = 0.044) or antiangiogenic drugs (HR = 0.11, p = 0.005) as first/second‐line therapy.

Conclusions

Upfront brain RT based on first‐line EGFR‐TKI might improve IC‐PFS but not OS in EGFR‐mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients, indicating potential survival benefit from brain SRS and early application of drugs with higher intracranial activity.

Afatinib treatment in a large real-world cohort of nonsmall cell lung cancer patients with common and uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor mutation

The epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) afatinib improves survival in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation. We analysed the outcome between EGFR mutation subtypes in a large afatinib-treated cohort in which 516 EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients receiving afatinib as front-line treatment. EGFR uncommon mutations include exon 20 insertion, de novo T790M of high or low allele frequency (dT790M_HAF /dT790M_LAF ), non-T790M compound mutation and others, where EGFR exon 20 insertion and dT790M_HAF were defined as type-I and the rest as type-II uncommon mutation. Four hundred and sixty-one (89.3%) and 55 (10.7%) patients were common and uncommon mutation, respectively. Exon 20 insertion and dT790M_HAF patients demonstrated a significantly shortened progression-free survival (PFS) (2.6 and 4.1 months) compared to EGFR common mutation, dT790M_LAF and other uncommon mutation patients (15.1, 27.0 and 18.4 months; P = 3 × 10^-8 ). Type-I uncommon mutation was an independent predictor of PFS (HR 4.46 [95% CI, 2.60-7.64]; P < .001) and OS (HR 2.56 [95% CI, 1.37-4.75]; P = .003). EGFR L858R patients demonstrated a significantly higher CNS progression (cause-specific HR, 3.16; 95% CI 1.24-8.08; P = .016), and type-I uncommon mutation patients exhibited a significantly higher systemic progression (cause-specific HR, 4.95; 95% CI 2.30-10.60; P = 4.3 × 10^-5 ). Tendencies of higher CNS and lower systemic progression were observed in type-II uncommon mutation patients. A PFS ≥ 12 months (OR 2.38 [95% CI, 1.18-4.89]; P = .016) and uncommon EGFR mutation (OR 0.08 [95% CI, 0.01-0.48]; P = .021) were independent predictors of secondary T790M. Afatinib-treated NSCLC patients presented an EGFR genotype-specific pattern of disease progression and outcome.

Efficacy and Safety of First-Generation EGFR-TKIs Combined with Chemotherapy for Treatment-Naïve Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Harboring Sensitive EGFR Mutations: A Single-Center, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Clinical Trial

Purpose

This single-center, open-label, single-arm, phase II clinical trial aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of the first-generation EGFR-TKIs combined with chemotherapy among treatment-naïve advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring sensitive EGFR mutations.

Materials and Methods

Patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC were given concurrent gefitinib (250 mg orally daily) and 3-week cycle of carboplatin plus pemetrexed for 4 to 6 cycles, followed by gefitinib maintenance until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02886195).

Results

Of the 21 patients enrolled in this study, a 76.2% ORR and 100% DCR were observed and a higher ORR was seen in patients with EGFR 21L858R mutations than in those with 19del mutations (P = 0.012). The subjects had a median PFS of 15.0 months and a median OS of 26.0 months, and numerically longer PFS was seen in patients with EGFR 21L858R mutations than in those with 19del mutations (P = 0.281). There were 15 NSCLC patients without cerebral metastases at baseline, with 4 cases developing cerebral metastases during the treatment, and the 6-, 12- and 24-month cumulative incidence rates of the central nervous system metastasis were 6.67%, 13.3% and 26.7%, respectively. There were 17 subjects with progressive diseases tested for EGFR T790M mutations, and 11 cases were positive for T790M mutations. Grade 3 toxicity included neutropenia (9.5%), leukopenia (4.8%), liver dysfunction (9.5%) and diarrhea (4.8%), and no grade 4 adverse events or treatment-related death occurred.

Conclusion

The combination of first-generation EGFR-TKIs and chemotherapy achieves a satisfactory PFS, ORR and DCR and well-tolerated toxicity in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations, notably in patients with EGFR L858R mutations.