Randomized phase II study of platinum-based chemotherapy plus controlled diet with or without metformin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Assessing the antitumor effects of metformin on ovarian clear cell carcinoma

Developing novel therapies that outperform the existing chemotherapeutic treatments is required for treatment-resistant ovarian clear cell carcinoma. We investigated the antitumor effect of metformin on ovarian clear cell carcinoma, enhancement of the antitumor effect by its combination with chemotherapy, and its molecular regulatory mechanism. First, we evaluated the viability of ovarian clear cell carcinoma lines using the water-soluble tetrazolium-1 assay and found that metformin suppressed cell viability. Cell viability was significantly suppressed by co-treatment with cisplatin and metformin. In contrast, co-treatment with paclitaxel and metformin showed no significant difference in viability compared with the group without metformin. Western blot analysis showed increased phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase in some cell lines and suppressed phosphorylation of the mammalian target of rapamycin in a particular cell line. Flow cytometry analysis revealed a significant increase in the rate of apoptosis in the metformin-treated group and rate of cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase in a particular cell line. These results indicated that metformin may be effective against cultured ovarian clear cell carcinoma cells, particularly in combination with cisplatin.

Knowledge mapping of metformin use on cancers: a bibliometric analysis (2013-2023)

There is substantial evidence from clinical and preclinical studies suggesting an association between metformin use and a reduced risk of cancer. However, the effects of metformin use on cancers have not yet been subjected to bibliometric analysis. The goal of this study was to explore the potential effects of metformin use on cancers and to conduct a comprehensive assessment of research hotspots related to the use of metformin on cancers. The results of the literature analysis were visualized using various tools such as Adobe Illustrator CC 2018, VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the R package "bibliometric." The average annual publications from 2013 to 2023 was 372. In terms of journals and co-cited journals, a total of 1,064 journals published 1958 papers, and Oncotarget published the highest number of papers (n = 153, 7.81%), while Cancer Research (Co-citation = 5,125) was the most frequently cited journal. A total of 25,665 authors participated in the research on metformin use on cancers. Metformin has demonstrated improved outcomes in various types of cancer, including breast cancer (BC), lung cancer (LC), colorectal cancer (CRC), prostate cancer (PC), and pancreatic cancer. This bibliometric analysis reviews the current literature on the clinical data on metformin use on cancers and describes the preclinical evidence illustrating the potential mechanisms of metformin use on various cancers directly or indirectly.

Unlocking the Potential: Caloric Restriction, Caloric Restriction Mimetics, and Their Impact on Cancer Prevention and Treatment

Caloric restriction (CR) and its related alternatives have been shown to be the only interventions capable of extending lifespan and decreasing the risk of cancer, along with a reduction in burden in pre-clinical trials. Nevertheless, the results from clinical trials have not been as conclusive as the pre-clinical results. Recognizing the challenges associated with long-term fasting, the application of caloric restriction mimetics (CRMs), pharmacological agents that mimic the molecular effects of CR, to harness the potential benefits while overcoming the practical limitations of fasting has resulted in an interesting alternative. This review synthesizes the findings of diverse clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of CR and CRMs. In dietary interventions, a fast-mimicking diet was the most tolerated to reduce tumoral growth markers and chemotherapy side effects. CRMs were well tolerated, and metformin and aspirin showed the most promising effect in reducing cancer risk in a selected group of patients. The application of CR and/or CRMs shows promising effects in anti-cancer therapy; however, there is a need for more evidence to safely include these interventions in standard-of-care therapies.

AMPK as a mediator of tissue preservation: time for a shift in dogma?

Ground-breaking discoveries have established 5'-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) as a central sensor of metabolic stress in cells and tissues. AMPK is activated through cellular starvation, exercise and drugs by either directly or indirectly affecting the intracellular AMP (or ADP) to ATP ratio. In turn, AMPK regulates multiple processes of cell metabolism, such as the maintenance of cellular ATP levels, via the regulation of fatty acid oxidation, glucose uptake, glycolysis, autophagy, mitochondrial biogenesis and degradation, and insulin sensitivity. Moreover, AMPK inhibits anabolic processes, such as lipogenesis and protein synthesis. These findings support the notion that AMPK is a crucial regulator of cell catabolism. However, studies have revealed that AMPK's role in cell homeostasis might not be as unidirectional as originally thought. This Review explores emerging evidence for AMPK as a promoter of cell survival and an enhancer of anabolic capacity in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue during catabolic crises. We discuss AMPK-activating interventions for tissue preservation during tissue wasting in cancer-associated cachexia and explore the clinical potential of AMPK activation in wasting conditions. Overall, we provide arguments that call for a shift in the current dogma of AMPK as a mere regulator of cell catabolism, concluding that AMPK has an unexpected role in tissue preservation.

Cancer biology in diabetes update: Focusing on antidiabetic drugs

The association of type 2 diabetes with certain cancer risk has been of great interest for years. However, the effect of diabetic medications on cancer development is not fully understood. Prospective clinical trials have not elucidated the long-term influence of hypoglycemic drugs on cancer incidence and the safety for cancer-bearing patients with diabetes, whereas numerous preclinical studies have shown that antidiabetic drugs could have an impact on carcinogenesis processes beyond the glycemic control effect. Because there is no evidence of the safety profile of antidiabetic agents on cancer biology, careful consideration would be required when prescribing any medicines to patients with diabetes and existing tumor. In this review, we discuss the potential influence of each diabetes therapy in cancer 'initiation', 'promotion' and 'progression'.

Cardiovascular/anti-inflammatory drugs repurposed for treating or preventing cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Due to encouraging pre-clinical data and supportive observational studies, there has been growing interest in applying cardiovascular drugs (including aspirin, angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors, statins, and metformin) approved to treat diseases such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus to the field of oncology. Moreover, given growing costs with cancer care, these medications have offered a potentially more affordable avenue to treat or prevent recurrence of cancer. We sought to investigate the anti-cancer effects of drugs repurposed from cardiology or anti-inflammatories to treat cancer. We specifically evaluated the following drug classes: HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors, aspirin, metformin, and both angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. We also included non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) because they exert a similar mechanism to aspirin by blocking prostaglandins and reducing inflammation that is thought to promote the development of cancer.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review using PubMed and Web of Science with search terms including "aspirin," "NSAID," "statin" (including specific statin drug names), "metformin," "ACE inhibitors," and "ARBs" (including specific anti-hypertensive drug names) in combination with "cancer." Searches were limited to human studies published between 2000 and 2023.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The number and percentage of studies reported positive results and pooled estimates of overall survival, progression-free survival, response, and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

We reviewed 3094 titles and included 67 randomized clinical trials. The most common drugs that were tested were metformin (n = 21; 30.9%), celecoxib (n = 20; 29.4%), and simvastatin (n = 8; 11.8%). There was only one study that tested cardiac glycosides and none that studied ACE inhibitors. The most common tumor types were non-small-cell lung cancer (n = 19; 27.9%); breast (n = 8; 20.6%), colorectal (n = 7; 10.3%), and hepatocellular (n = 6; 8.8%). Most studies were conducted in a phase II trial (n = 38; 55.9%). Most studies were tested in metastatic cancers (n = 49; 72.1%) and in the first-line setting (n = 36; 521.9%). Four studies (5.9%) were stopped early because of difficulty with accrual. The majority of studies did not demonstrate an improvement in either progression-free survival (86.1% of studies testing progression-free survival) or in overall survival (94.3% of studies testing overall survival). Progression-free survival was improved in five studies (7.4%), and overall survival was improved in three studies (4.4%). Overall survival was significantly worse in two studies (3.8% of studies testing overall survival), and progression-free survival was worse in one study (2.8% of studies testing progression-free survival).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Despite promising pre-clinical and population-based data, cardiovascular drugs and anti-inflammatory medications have overall not demonstrated benefit in the treatment or preventing recurrence of cancer. These findings may help guide future potential clinical trials involving these medications when applied in oncology.

Current status and frontier tracking of clinical trials on Metformin for cancer treatment

PURPOSE

Metformin has been used clinically for more than six decades. Over time, numerous remarkable effects of metformin beyond the clinic have been discovered and discussed. Metformin has been shown to have a favorable impact on cancer therapy in addition to its clinically recognized hypoglycemic effect. However, the antitumor efficacy of metformin in humans has not been clearly demonstrated yet. Hence, a systematic analysis of the existing trials is necessary.

METHODS

Here, we retrieved clinical trials from the Clinical Trials.gov database to overview the clinical development of metformin for the treatment of cancer, analyze existing clinical results, and summarize some promising applications for specific cancer therapies.

RESULTS

The potential application of metformin contains three directions: Firstly, improvement of metabolic factors associated with treatment effects, such as insulin resistance and peripheral neuropathy. Secondly, in combination with immune checkpoint blockade effects. Finally, use it for the endocrine treatment of hormone-dependent cancers.

CONCLUSION

Although the outcomes of metformin as a repurposed agent in some trials have been unsatisfactory, it still has the potential to be used in select cancer therapy settings.

Efficacy and safety of metformin in combination with chemotherapy in cancer patients without diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The results of a meta-analysis of retrospective studies suggest that the use of metformin in cancer patients may prolong progression-free disease survival and overall survival. However, the studies included in the meta-analysis did not strictly distinguish between patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus. Therefore, further studies are needed to assess whether the use of adjuvant chemotherapy with metformin in cancer patients without diabetes improves prognosis.

Method

Systematic searches of Embase, Pubmed, and The Cochrane library were performed for the subject terms metformin and neoplasm and for free words. Data related to PFS, OS were extracted according to inclusion exclusion criteria. The data were combined and meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 to confirm the efficacy and safety of metformin administration.

Results

There were 3228 publications retrieved from the database and a total of 13 publications with 955 patients were included in the meta-analysis after screening. All included studies were randomised controlled trials. Metformin combined with adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve progression-free survival (HR=1,95CI 0.79-1.25), overall survival (HR=0.91,95% CI 0.69-1.20) and did not improve objective disease response rates in patients. There was no significant difference in grade 3-4 adverse reactions compared to placebo.

Conclusion

In this meta-analysis of randomised controlled trial studies, we found that chemotherapy in combination with metformin in cancer patients without diabetes did not prolong progression-free survival and overall survival and improved disease control in patients, although there was no significant difference in terms of safety. More high-quality randomised controlled trials are needed in the future to confirm the in vivo anti-tumour activity and survival benefit of metformin.

Efficacy of metformin adjunctive therapy as the treatment for non-diabetic patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A Systematic review and Meta-analysis

Background

Currently, the anticancer effects of metformin on different types of lung cancer have been frequently studied. However, the relationship between metformin and prognosis in nondiabetic patients with lung cancer remains controversial. To systematically evaluate the efficacy of metformin adjunctive therapy as the treatment for nondiabetic patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to provide an evidence-based reference for clinical medication.

Materials and Methods

The literatures related to Phase II or III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of metformin adjunctive therapy in nondiabetic patients with advanced NSCLC, including EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus database, were retrieved by computer, and the search time ranged from January 2017 to August 2022. The risk of bias assessment tool recommended by Cochrane Systematic Evaluator Manual 5.1.0 was used to evaluate the quality of the RCTs included. Rev Man 5.3 software and STATA15.0 were used for meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 8 studies were included (925 patients). Meta-analysis results showed that there were no significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-1.36, P = 0.77), overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.61-1.30, P = 0.55, n =7), objective response rate (ORR) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.37, 95% CI: 0.76-2.46, P = 0.30), and 1-year PFS rate (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.39-1.94, P = 0.73, n = 3). Sensitivity analysis showed that PFS and OS indexes were stable.

Conclusion

Metformin adjunctive therapy can improve the DCR of nondiabetic patients with advanced NSCLC. In addition, the patients cannot obtain a prolonged PFS, OS, 1-year PFS rate, and higher ORR rate.

Is it still worth pursuing the repurposing of metformin as a cancer therapeutic?

Over the past 15 years, there has been great interest in the potential to repurpose the diabetes drug, metformin, as a cancer treatment. However, despite considerable efforts being made to investigate its efficacy in a number of large randomised clinical trials in different tumour types, results have been disappointing to date. This perspective article summarises how interest initially developed in the oncological potential of metformin and the diverse clinical programme of work to date including our contribution to establishing the intra-tumoral pharmacodynamic effects of metformin in the clinic. We also discuss the lessons that can be learnt from this experience and whether a further clinical investigation of metformin in cancer is warranted.

Addition of metformin for non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving antineoplastic agents

Background and purpose: Previous studies have found that metformin can inhibit tumor growth and improve outcomes for cancer patients. However, the association between the addition of metformin to the treatment regimen and survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving antineoplastic agents such as chemotherapy drugs, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of metformin in NSCLC patients who received the aforementioned antineoplastic therapies.

Methods: Several electronic databases were searched for relevant studies published by 10 September 2022. The primary and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); eligible studies were those comparing patients with and without the addition of metformin. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined, with all statistical analyses performed using STATA 15.0.

Results: A total of 19 studies involving 6,419 participants were included, of which six were randomized controlled trials. The overall pooled results indicate that the addition of metformin improved OS (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.71–0.98, p = 0.029) and PFS (HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74–0.99, p = 0.039). However, subgroup analysis based on treatment type and comorbidity of diabetes mellitus demonstrated that improvements in OS and PFS were observed only in diabetic and EGFR-TKI-treated patients (OS: HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.45–0.90, p = 0.011; PFS: HR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.34–1.03, p = 0.061).

Conclusion: Overall, this meta-analysis found that metformin use could improve outcomes for diabetic patients receiving EGFR-TKIs. However, no significant association between the addition of metformin and the survival of non-diabetic NSCLC patients receiving chemotherapy or ICI therapy was identified based on the current evidence.

Efficacy of metformin therapy in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis of 22 randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

To investigate whether metformin monotherapy or adjunctive therapy improves the prognosis in patients with any type of cancer compared to non-metformin users (age ≥18).

METHODS

Databases (Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and clinical trial registries ( ClinicalTrials.gov ; the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) were screened for randomized, controlled trials (RCT) reporting at least progression-free survival (PFS) and/or overall survival (OS). Main outcome measures included hazard ratios (HR), and combined HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Of the 8419 records screened, 22 RCTs comprising 5943 participants were included. Pooled HRs were not statistically significant in both PFS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.15, I² = 50%) and OS (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.86-1.13, I² = 33%) for patients with cancer between the metformin and control groups. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that metformin treatment was associated with a marginally significant improvement in PFS in reproductive system cancers (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74-1.00) and a significantly worse PFS in digestive system cancers (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.03-2.04). The PFS or OS was observed consistently across maintenance dose, diabetes exclusion, median follow-up, risk of bias, and combined antitumoral therapies.

CONCLUSION

Metformin treatment was not associated with cancer-related mortality in adults compared with placebo or no treatment. However, metformin implied beneficial effects in the PFS of the patients with reproductive system cancers but was related to a worse PFS in digestive system cancers.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number CRD42022324672.

Clinical Value on Combined Detection of Serum CA724, DKK1, and TK1 in Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer

Objective

To explore the clinical value on combined detection of serum carbohydrate antigen 724 (CA724), secreted protein dickkopf-1 (DKK1), and thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) in the diagnosis of gastric cancer (GC).

Methods

The clinical data of 63 GC patients (GC group) and 54 patients with benign gastric lesions (control group) admitted to Zhu Xianyi Memorial Hospital of Tianjin Medical University from June 2020 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The levels of serum CA724, DKK1, and TK1 in the two groups were detected by electrochemiluminescence instrument, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and enhanced chemiluminescence. The diagnostic efficacy of single detection and combined detection was analyzed by drawing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

Compared with the control group, the serological indexes of patients in GC group were markedly higher (P < 0.001). ROC curve analysis showed that the areas under the curve of serum CA724, DKK1, TK1, and combined detection in the diagnosis of GC were 0.849, 0.754, 0.685, and 0.923, respectively; and the sensitivity and specificity of their combined detection were higher than those of separate detection.

Conclusion

The levels of serum CA724, DKK1, and TK1 were highly expressed in GC patients, with a higher diagnostic value for GC in their combined detection, which can effectively screen and assist the diagnosis of GC.

Insulinoma-Associated Protein 1 (INSM1): Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Use in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is an aggressive and difficult to treat cancer. Although immunohistochemistry is not mandatory for a SCLC diagnosis, it might be required, especially in small samples. Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is expressed in endocrine and nervous tissues during embryogenesis, generally absent in adults and re-expressed in SCLC and other neuroendocrine neoplasms. Its high specificity propelled its use as diagnostic biomarker and an attractive therapeutic target. Herein, we aim to provide a systematic and critical review on the use of INSM1 for diagnosis, prognostication and the treatment of SCLC. An extensive bibliographic search was conducted in PubMed® focusing on articles published since 2015. According to the literature, INSM1 is a highly sensitive (75–100%) and specific (82–100%) neuroendocrine immunohistochemical marker for SCLC diagnosis. It can be used in histological and cytological samples. Although advantageous, its standalone use is currently not recommended. Studies correlating INSM1 expression and prognosis have disclosed contrasting results, although the expression seemed to entail a worse survival. Targeting INSM1 effectively suppressed SCLC growth either as a suicide gene therapy regulator or as an indirect target of molecular-targeted therapy. INSM1 represents a valuable biomarker for a SCLC diagnosis that additionally offers vast opportunities for the development of new prognostic and therapeutic strategies.

The Effect of Metformin on Bladder Cancer Incidence and Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Effective oral treatment options for urothelial bladder cancer (BC) are lacking. Metformin, the most frequently used oral drug in type II diabetes mellitus, has putative anticancer properties and could, therefore, influence BC incidence and treatment outcomes. We systematically reviewed the current literature regarding the effect of metformin on BC incidence and oncological outcomes in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

METHODS

This review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Literature was gathered through a systematic search in PubMed/Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane library. Risk of bias was determined using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomized trials. Hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted and pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We reviewed 13 studies, including 3,315,320 patients, considering the risk of developing BC after metformin exposure and 9 studies, including 4,006 patients, on oncological outcomes of patients with BC. Metformin did not affect BC incidence (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87 -1.09) or oncological outcomes for NMIBC but did show a reduced risk of recurrence (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32 -0.84), cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 -0.78) and overall mortality (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47 -0.92) in MIBC.

CONCLUSIONS

The role of metformin in the prevention and treatment of BC in patients remains unclear. Although a beneficial effect of metformin on treatment outcomes of certain stages of BC may exist, a definitive conclusion cannot be drawn. Prospective clinical trials are needed to assess the efficacy of metformin for BC treatment.

Insulin and cancer: a tangled web

For a century, since the pioneering work of Otto Warburg, the interwoven relationship between metabolism and cancer has been appreciated. More recently, with obesity rates rising in the U.S. and worldwide, epidemiologic evidence has supported a link between obesity and cancer. A substantial body of work seeks to mechanistically unpack the association between obesity, altered metabolism, and cancer. Without question, these relationships are multifactorial and cannot be distilled to a single obesity- and metabolism-altering hormone, substrate, or factor. However, it is important to understand the hormone-specific associations between metabolism and cancer. Here, we review the links between obesity, metabolic dysregulation, insulin, and cancer, with an emphasis on current investigational metabolic adjuncts to standard-of-care cancer treatment.

Metformin Combining PD-1 Inhibitor Enhanced Anti-Tumor Efficacy in STK11 Mutant Lung Cancer Through AXIN-1-Dependent Inhibition of STING Ubiquitination

Background: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with STK11 mutation showed primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The glucose-lowering drug metformin exerted anti-cancer effect and enhanced efficacy of chemotherapy in NSCLC with KRAS/STK11 co-mutation, yet it is unknown whether metformin may enhance ICI efficacy in STK11 mutant NSCLC.

Methods: We studied the impact of metformin on ICI efficacy in STK11 mutant NSCLC in vitro and in vivo using colony formation assay, cell viability assay, Ki67 staining, ELISA, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout, and animal experiments.

Results: Through colony formation assay, Ki67 incorporation assay, and CCK-8 assay, we found that metformin significantly enhanced the killing of H460 cells and A549 cells by T cells. In NOD-SCID xenografts, metformin in combination with PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab effectively decreased tumor growth and increased infiltration of CD8+ T cells. Metformin enhanced stabilization of STING and activation of its downstream signaling pathway. siRNA-mediated knockdown of STING abolished the effect of metformin on T cell-mediated killing of tumor cells. Next, we found that CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of the scaffold protein AXIN-1 abolished the effect of metformin on T cell-mediated killing and STING stabilization. Immunoprecipitation and confocal macroscopy revealed that metformin enhanced the interaction and colocalization between AXIN-1 and STING. Protein-protein interaction modeling indicated that AXIN-1 may directly bind to STING at its K150 site. Next, we found that metformin decreased K48-linked ubiquitination of STING and inhibited the interaction of E3-ligand RNF5 and STING. Moreover, in AXIN-1−/− H460 cells, metformin failed to alter the interaction of RNF5 and STING.

Conclusion: Metformin combining PD-1 inhibitor enhanced anti-tumor efficacy in STK11 mutant lung cancer through inhibition of RNF5-mediated K48-linked ubiquitination of STING, which was dependent on AXIN-1.

Machine learning and bioinformatics analysis revealed classification and potential treatment strategy in stage 3-4 NSCLC patients

BACKGROUND

Precision medicine has increased the accuracy of cancer diagnosis and treatment, especially in the era of cancer immunotherapy. Despite recent advances in cancer immunotherapy, the overall survival rate of advanced NSCLC patients remains low. A better classification in advanced NSCLC is important for developing more effective treatments.

METHOD

The calculation of abundances of tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) was conducted using Cell-type Identification By Estimating Relative Subsets Of RNA Transcripts (CIBERSORT), xCell (xCELL), Tumor IMmune Estimation Resource (TIMER), Estimate the Proportion of Immune and Cancer cells (EPIC), and Microenvironment Cell Populations-counter (MCP-counter). K-means clustering was used to classify patients, and four machine learning methods (SVM, Randomforest, Adaboost, Xgboost) were used to build the classifiers. Multi-omics datasets (including transcriptomics, DNA methylation, copy number alterations, miRNA profile) and ICI immunotherapy treatment cohorts were obtained from various databases. The drug sensitivity data were derived from PRISM and CTRP databases.

RESULTS

In this study, patients with stage 3-4 NSCLC were divided into three clusters according to the abundance of TIICs, and we established classifiers to distinguish these clusters based on different machine learning algorithms (including SVM, RF, Xgboost, and Adaboost). Patients in cluster-2 were found to have a survival advantage and might have a favorable response to immunotherapy. We then constructed an immune-related Poor Prognosis Signature which could successfully predict the advanced NSCLC patient survival, and through epigenetic analysis, we found 3 key molecules (HSPA8, CREB1, RAP1A) which might serve as potential therapeutic targets in cluster-1. In the end, after screening of drug sensitivity data derived from CTRP and PRISM databases, we identified several compounds which might serve as medication for different clusters.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has not only depicted the landscape of different clusters of stage 3-4 NSCLC but presented a treatment strategy for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Prognostic value and non-neuroendocrine role of INSM1 in small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a malignant lung neuroendocrine tumor with early metastasis, rapid progression, and poor outcomes. Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has been an excellent marker for neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation and widely used in the diagnosis of NE neoplasms, including SCLC. However, its role beyond NE diagnostic marker remained little reported.

METHODS

We examined immunohistochemical expression of INSM1 in 73 surgically resected SCLC, analyzed its prognostic value by Kaplan-Meier method, and investigated clinical-pathological features of INSM1 high SCLC. In vitro, We assessed INSM1 function on glucose intake, tumor migration, and Cisplatin resistance by 2-NBDG glucose uptake fluorescent assay, transwell assay, and ANNEXIN V/PI assay, respectively. In vivo, we evaluated the therapeutic value of metformin on reversing INSM1 induced chemoresistance by BALB/c nude mice xenograft tumor model.

RESULTS

High INSM1 expression was correlated with lymph node metastasis (LNM) (p = 0.0005), later TNM stages (p = 0.0003), and predicted poor survival (Log-rank p = 0.038). Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed INSM1 as an independent prognostic factor in SCLC (p = 0.012, HR:3.195, 95%CI:1.288-7.927). Interestingly, LNM was correlated with worse prognosis only in patients received chemotherapy (Log-rank p = 0.027) rather than the others (Log-rank p = 0.40). In patients having LNM and treated with chemotherapy, high INSM1 was correlated with worse clinic outcome (Log-rank p = 0.009). In vitro, overexpression of INSM1 decreased AMPK-α expression as well as glucose intake, promoted tumor cell migration, and limited the apoptosis induced by Cisplatin, which all could be reversed by Metformin. In vivo, INSM1 overexpression also contributed to tumor growth beyond inducing Cisplatin resistance.

CONCLUSION

Our finding suggested INSM1 played more role than a NE marker, partly through down-regulating AMPK signal. INSM1 may serve as a novel prognostic marker and therapeutic target in SCLC.

Benefits of Metformin Combined with Pemetrexed-Based Platinum Doublets as a First-Line Therapy for Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients with Diabetes

Lung cancer remains a challenge in daily practice. Chemotherapy is first considered for advanced lung adenocarcinoma bearing no active driver mutations. Maintaining drug efficacy and overcoming drug resistance are essential. This study aimed to explore the real-world use of anti-diabetic agent metformin in combination with pemetrexed-based platinum doublets in a first-line setting. We retrospectively collected data during 2004~2013 from TaiwaN's National Health Insurance Research Database to access the survival benefit of metformin combined with pemetrexed-based platinum doublets as a first-line therapy for diabetic patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Demographic data and information regarding platinum reagents, diabetes medications, and metformin doses were gathered, and overall survival status regarding metformin use was analyzed. Overall survival status based on the daily dose and the calculated cumulative defined daily dose (DDD) of metformin prescribed during the first 3 months after lung cancer was diagnosed was also assessed. A total of 495 patients were enrolled with a mean age of 67 years old, and the majority of the patients were male. After adjusting for age, sex, diabetes medication, and platinum reagents used, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the metformin-user group was 0.61 (95% confidence interval (CI); 0.46~0.79; p < 0.001). The metformin-user group had a survival benefit (log-rank p < 0.001). We analyzed metformin dosing during the first 3 months after lung cancer diagnosis, and for a daily dose ≥ 1500 mg, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was 0.42 (95% CI; 0.27~0.65; p < 0.001). Regarding the cumulative DDD of metformin, a DDD equal to or exceeding 21 resulted in aHR of 0.48 (95% CI; 0.34~0.69; p < 0.001). In this study, we found that the combination of metformin and pemetrexed-based platinum doublets provides a robust survival benefit as a first-line therapy for diabetic patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. It is worth conducting a large and randomized clinical trial to further investigate the antitumor effects of metformin on advanced lung adenocarcinoma when used as a first-ling therapy, including in non-diabetic patients.

Efficacy of Metformin in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy or Endocrine Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested that metformin might improve survival outcomes in patients with breast cancer. However, findings on the efficacy of metformin with chemotherapy or endocrine therapy are inconsistent.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the efficacy of metformin with chemotherapy or endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients according to the treatment setting, including neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastasis/recurrence.

METHODS

We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and EMBASE from inception through July 2020. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and hypoglycemia rate were the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included severe adverse events (SAEs) and relapse-free survival. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach and performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of metformin with chemotherapy and endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer.

RESULTS

Our systematic review included 412 participants from 5 trials. Metformin showed little to no difference in OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.13; 95% CI = 0.71-1.81; certainty of evidence [COE], moderate) and PFS (HR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.86-1.50; COE, moderate) in patients with metastasis/recurrence. The evidence was very uncertain about the effect of metformin on survival outcomes in patients who received metformin with neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment. Metformin showed little to no difference in hypoglycemia and SAEs.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Metformin should be discouraged routinely in nondiabetic patients with metastatic/recurrent breast cancer. Further RCTs are needed to verify whether metformin with chemotherapy or endocrine therapy results in significant clinical benefits in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting.