Zeng GZ, Rao BQ, Lei YM, Le SL, Zhou QX, Pan ZH, Sun MS. Application of dynamic MRI defecography in diagnosis of outlet obstructive constipation.
Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2019;
27:131-138. [DOI:
10.11569/wcjd.v27.i2.131]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM
To assess the application value of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) defecography in the diagnosis of outlet obstructive constipation (OCC).
METHODS
Forty-eight patients with suspected OOC at Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from March 2016 to February 2018 were selected, and they underwent dynamic MRI defecography and X-ray defecography. The situations of dynamic MRI defecography and X-ray defecography were recorded. Using X-ray defecography as the standard, the specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of dynamic MRI defecography were calculated.
RESULTS
There was no statistical difference in the diagnosis of intersigmoid hernia, puborectalis spasm, hernia, or internal hemorrhoid between dynamic MRI defecography and X-ray defecography (P > 0.05). The detection rates of dynamic MRI defecography in the diagnosis of rectocele, rectal mucosal prolapse, perinaeum descent, intrarectal invaginate, and sigmoid colon zigzagging were lower than those of X-ray defecography (P < 0.05). Dynamic MRI defecography could find lesions that cannot be displayed by X-ray defecography, including muscular rupture, uterine fibroid, cervical accepts cyst, sacral cyst, and mullerian duct cyst. Using X-ray defecography as the gold standard, the specificity and positive predictive value of dynamic MRI defecography in the diagnosis of rectal mucosal prolapse, rectocele, puborectalis spasm, intrarectal invaginate, intersigmoid hernia, hernia, sigmoid colon zigzagging, and perinaeum descent were all 100.00%; the sensitivity and positive predictive value for different diseases had a significant difference, the positive predictive value was generally higher, and the sensitivity was usually lower.
CONCLUSION
MRI and X-ray defecography have their own advantages in the diagnosis of OOC. Dynamic MRI defecography can provide information on the pelvic organ and pelvic wall, pelvic floor function, and morphological structure, and it is a good supplement to X-ray defecography. Dynamic MRI defecography can provide guidance for overall evaluation and comprehensive diagnosis of OOC with pelvic multiple-organ lesions.
Collapse