A novel method for the accurate characterization of transport and structural parameters of deformable membranes utilized in pressure- and osmotically driven membrane processes

Trends and errors in reverse osmosis membrane performance calculations stemming from test pressure and simplifying assumptions about concentration polarization and solute rejection

A primary goal in the design of reverse osmosis (RO) membranes is to improve water-solute selectivity and water permeance. These transport properties are commonly calculated in the literature using the solution-diffusion model with selectivity (A/B, bar-1) defined as the ratio between water permeance (A, L.m-2.h-1.bar-1) and solute permeance (B, L.m-2.h-1). In calculating transport properties, researchers often use simplifying assumptions about concentration polarization (CP; i.e., assuming negligible CP or a certain extent of CP) and solute rejection (i.e., assuming solute rejection is approximately 1 to enable the explicit use of the CP modulus in solute permeance calculations). Although using these assumptions to calculate transport properties is common practice, we could not find a study that evaluated the errors associated with using them. The uncertainty in these errors could impede unequivocally identifying manufacturing approaches that break through the commonly plotted trade-off frontier between selectivity and water permeance (A/B vs. A); however, we did not find in the literature a study that quantified such errors. Accordingly, we aimed to: (1) quantify the error in transport properties (A, B, and A/B) calculated using common simplifying assumptions about CP and rejection; and (2) determine if using simplifying assumptions affects conclusions drawn about membrane performance or trends concerning the trade-off frontier. Results show that compared with the case where no simplifying assumptions were made, simplified calculations were least accurate at low pressures for water permeance (up to 78% overestimation) and high pressures for solute permeance (up to 188% overestimation). Accordingly, the corresponding selectivities were least accurate at low pressure (up to 111% overestimation) and high pressure (up to 66% underestimation), and conclusions drawn about membrane performance and trade-off trends were pressure-dependent. Importantly, even in the absence of simplifying assumptions, selectivity results were pressure-dependent, indicating the importance of standardizing test conditions for the continued use of current performance metrics (i.e., A/B and A). We propose a two-pressure approach-collecting data for A and B at a high and a low pressure, respectively-combined with simplifying assumptions for more accurate simplified estimations of selectivity (< 10% absolute error). Our work contributes to a better understanding of the effects of operating pressure and key simplifying assumptions commonly used in calculating RO membrane performance metrics and interpretation of corresponding results.

Exploring the Limitations of Osmotically Assisted Reverse Osmosis: Membrane Fouling and the Limiting Flux

Osmotically assisted reverse osmosis (OARO) has shown great potential for low-cost and energy-efficient brine management. However, its performance can be significantly limited by membrane fouling. Here, we performed for the first time a comprehensive study on OARO membrane fouling, explored the associated fouling mechanisms, and evaluated fouling reversibility via simple physical cleaning strategies. First, internal membrane fouling at the draw (permeate) side was shown to be insignificant. Flux behavior in short-term operation was correlated to both the evolution of fouling and the change of internal concentration polarization. In long-term operation, membrane fouling constrained the OARO water flux to a singular, common upper limit, in terms of limiting flux, which was demonstrated to be independent of operating pressures and membrane properties. Generally, once the limiting flux was exceeded, the OARO process performance could not be improved by higher-pressure operation or by utilizing more permeable and selective membranes. Instead, different cyclic cleaning strategies were shown to be more promising alternatives for improving performance. While both surface flushing and osmotic backwashing (OB) were found to be highly effective when using pure water, a full flux recovery could not be achieved when a nonpure solution was used during OB due to severe internal clogging during OB. All in all, the presented findings provided significant implications for OARO operation and fouling control.