Acetazolamide therapy in a case of fingolimod-associated macular edema: early benefits and long-term limitations

Diagnosis and Management of Fingolimod-Associated Macular Edema

Objective

To investigate the clinical features, treatment, and prognosis of fingolimod-associated macular edema (FAME) and to provide a reference for its rational management.

Methods

FAME-related case reports were included in a pooled analysis by searching Chinese and English databases from 2010 to November 31, 2021.

Results

The median age of 41 patients was 50 years (range, 21, 67 years), of whom 32 were women. The median time to onset of FAME was 3 m (range.03, 120), and blurred vision (17 cases) and decreased vision (13 cases) were the most common complaints. A total of 55 eyes were involved in FAME, including the left eye (14 cases), right eye (10 cases), and both eyes (15 cases), of which 46 eyes had best-corrected visual acuity close to normal (20/12-20/60) and 8 eyes had moderate to severe visual impairment (20/80-20/500). Fundus examination in 23 patients showed macular edema (11 cases). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) in 39 patients mainly showed perifoveal cysts (24 cases), ME (23 cases), and foveal thickening (19 cases). Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) in 18 patients showed vascular leakage (11 cases). Complete resolution of ME occurred in 50 eyes and recovery of visual acuity occurred in 45 eyes at a median time of 2 m (range 0.25, 24) after discontinuation of fingolimod or administration of topical therapy.

Conclusions

Macular edema is a known complication of fingolimod. All patients using fingolimod require regular eye exams, especially those with a history of diabetes and uveitis and those undergoing cataract surgery.

Ocular adverse events from pharmacological treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis-A systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to review the scientific evidence and describe the ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to pharmacological treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines in the MEDLINE, LILACS, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases. Articles were filtered based on title and abstract considering the selection criteria and subsequently filtered by full-text reading. The resulting articles were evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Quality Tools. Study characteristics and results were extracted and presented in structured tables to conduct a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

A total of 2852 published articles were extracted using our strategy. After removing duplicates, 2841 articles were screened based on title and abstract, 102 articles were evaluated using quality tools, and 69 articles were filtered by full-text reading. Through this search strategy, 60 articles met all the inclusion criteria and seven articles, through a search update conducted in the same manner, were included. This resulted in 67 articles meeting the inclusion criteria, of which 11 were experimental and 56 were observational. The therapies related to ocular TEAEs were alemtuzumab, amantadine, fingolimod, steroids, CTLA-4 Ig, estriol, interferon β, natalizumab, hyperbaric oxygen, rituximab, siponimod, teriflunomide, and tovaxin. Fingolimod and siponimod were commonly associated with macular edema, interferon β was associated with retinopathy, alemtuzumab was associated with thyroid eye disease, amantadine was associated with corneal edema, and steroids were associated with acute retinal necrosis. Opportunistic infections were also found, and there was one life-threatening case.

CONCLUSIONS

Our search revealed different methodological assessments of the topic. However, longitudinal studies regarding ocular TEAEs related to multiple sclerosis therapy are necessary to provide evidence-based recommendations, especially in understudied regions such as Latin America and Africa. Physicians should monitor ocular symptoms in patients being treated for multiple sclerosis and consider an interdisciplinary approach.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO ID CRD42020106886.

Assessment of Macular Function by Multifocal Electroretinogram in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Treated with Fingolimod

Introduction

This study aimed to evaluate whether treatment with fingolimod (FTY) may induce functional changes on the macular pre-ganglionic retinal elements in patients affected by relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS) without optic neuritis (ON).

Methods

This case–control observational and retrospective study assessed multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) responses from 35 healthy controls (mean age 43.58 ± 5.76 years), 41 patients with RR-MS without ON (mean age 40.64 ± 4.83 years, MS-noFTY group), and from 21 patients with RR-MS without ON (mean age 42.38 ± 12.34 years) and treated with fingolimod (Gilenya®, Novartis Europharm, 0.5 mg/day) (MS-FTY group). MfERG N1 and P1 implicit times (ITs), and N1–P1 response amplitude densities (RADs) were measured from concentric rings (R) with increasing foveal eccentricity: 0–5° (R1), 5–10° (R2), 10–15° (R3), 15–20° (R4), 20–25° (R5). We considered R1 and R2 as “central macular areas” and R3, R4 and R5 as “more eccentric retinal areas”. In the MS-FTY group, mfERG recordings were performed between 6 and 12 months (mean 7.2 ± 1.5 months) from the start of FTY.

Results

In the MS-FTY group, the mean values of mfERG N1 and P1 ITs and RADs detected in both central macular areas (R1 and R2) and in more eccentric retinal areas (R3, R4 and R5) were not significantly different (p > 0.01) with respect to those of control and MS-noFTY groups.

Conclusions

Our mfERG results suggest that the chronic use of FTY does not induce a dysfunction of pre-ganglionic retinal elements located in the 0–25° of central retina. Since FTY does not cause any retinal functional abnormality, we suggest that FTY treatment could not produce any toxic effect on pre-ganglionic retinal elements even in the absence of macular oedema.

The Ocular Manifestations of Drugs Used to Treat Multiple Sclerosis

Recent times have seen an increase in the number of options to treat multiple sclerosis. Ocular manifestations of multiple sclerosis are well known to treating physicians; however, the medications used to treat multiple sclerosis can also have ocular side effects. This review article focuses on the ocular manifestations of corticosteroids and disease-modifying agents such as interferon, fingolomod, natalizumab, alemtuzumab and mitoxantron used to treat the disease. The ocular manifestations of multiple sclerosis treatments can be varied depending on the drug used, and include retinopathy, chronic central serous chorioretinopathy, macular oedema, Graves' ophthalmopathy and cortical blindness. These effects may be specific to the drug or secondary to their immunosuppressive effect. The association of macular oedema with fingolomod is clear and merits ocular screening for toxicity. The immunosuppressive nature of the treatments makes patients prone to acquired infections. Hence, if a patient with multiple sclerosis presents with vision loss, infectious and drug-induced aetiology should be considered alongside relapses of multiple sclerosis itself as a cause.

Fingolimod Associated Bilateral Cystoid Macular Edema-Wait and See?

Fingolimod 0.5-mg once-daily is an approved therapy for patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Several pivotal and real-world studies have demonstrated that fingolimod is associated with the development of macular edema (ME). Herein, we present a case of a diabetic MS patient who developed severe bilateral ME during fingolimod treatment. By means of this case study we provide a detailed review about fingolimod associated macular edema (FAME), its current incidence with or without diabetes mellitus, and previous therapy attempts and outcomes in MS patients. Intravitreal administration of antibodies raised against vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) has not yet been used in the management of FAME, however, the excellent therapeutic response in our patient may justify the use of anti-VEGF-A agents in combination with cessation of fingolimod to achieve fast resolution of FAME and to prevent visual deficits, particularly in bilateral FAME.

Fingolimod: therapeutic mechanisms and ocular adverse effects

Fingolimod is an oral immunomodulating drug used in the management of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). We aim to review the published literature on ocular manifestations of fingolimod therapy and their possible underlying mechanisms. The therapeutic effects of fingolimod are mediated via sphingosine receptors, which are found ubiquitously in various organs, including lymphoid cells, central nervous system, cardiac myocytes, and smooth muscle cells. Fingolimod-associated macular oedema (FAME) is the most common ocular side effect but retinal haemorrhages and retinal vein occlusion can occur. The visual consequences appear to be mild and, in cases of FAME, resolution is often attained with discontinuation of therapy. However, in cases of retinal vein occlusion, discontinuation of fingolimod alone may not be sufficient and intra-vitreal therapy may be required. We also propose a pragmatic service pathway for monitoring patients on fingolimod therapy, which includes stratifying them by risk and visual acuity.

Acute onset of fingolimod-associated macular edema

Purpose

Fingolimod is among the first oral disease-modifying agents for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Despite its favorable safety profile, fingolimod may cause macular edema, a significant adverse event, which occurs within the first 4 months of therapy. Macular edema usually resolves upon discontinuation of fingolimod; however, the time required for resolution of this condition is unknown.

Observations

A 42-year-old white male with a history of relapsing-remitting MS presented with blurring of vision in his left eye 24 h after the first dose of fingolimod. Dilated fundus examination of the left eye revealed an increased retinal thickness and mild optic disc pallor. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) confirmed the diagnosis of cystoid macular edema. Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) was initiated immediately after the diagnosis, and fingolimod therapy was discontinued shortly thereafter. Seven weeks after the initial presentation, intermediate uveitis was noted in the inferior periphery of the left eye, and SD-OCT revealed worsening of macular edema. Acetazolamide therapy was added to the topical NSAID to control the edema. Three weeks after initiation of acetazolamide, macular thickness reduced significantly. The patient then stopped all medications, and 3 weeks later macular edema rebounded. Systemic steroid was employed to control both the intermediate uveitis and macular edema.

Conclusions and importance

We report a case of acute and very rapid onset of fingolimod-associated macular edema (FAME). Acetazolamide may have a beneficial effect on macular edema secondary to fingolimod. It is unclear if intermediate uveitis is associated with the rapid development of FAME.