Lower limb flexor reflex: Comparisons between drug-induced akathisia and restless legs syndrome

Presynaptic inhibition in restless legs syndrome

Introduction: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a condition that particularly urges at night in resting and causes the need to move the legs. Although the pathophysiology has not yet been clarified, dopamine and iron metabolism and spinal cord pathologies are blamed for causing the condition. There are few studies on spinal reflex mechanisms on RLS. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the role of presynaptic inhibition (PreI) in the spinal cord in RLS.Methods: Fourteen patients with RLS and 14 controls with similar demographic characteristics were included in the study. Soleus muscle H-reflex (Ht) investigation was performed for subjects whose electrophysiologic investigation was normal. The Ht response was conditioned to the stimulation of the common peroneal nerve (CPN) (Hc). The test and conditioned stimulation intervals were kept between 10 ms, 20 ms, 30 ms, 40 ms, 50 ms, 75 ms, 100 ms, 150 ms and 200 ms. In each inter-stimulus interval, nonparametric repeat measurement evaluations were conducted with the percentage value of Hc/Ht. The Hc/Ht values of the study and control groups in the same intervals were compared separately.Results: A significant decrease was detected in Hc values in the control group in the repeat measurement values at 20 ms and 100 ms inter-stimulus intervals; however, there was not decrease in any intervals in the patient's group.Conclusion: The absence of any decrease in Hc reflexes for 20-100 ms intervals revealed that discernible PreI was vanished in RLS patients.

Restless legs syndrome: Clinical changes in nervous system excitability at the spinal cord level

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a complex multifactorial disorder whose aetiology has yet to be fully elucidated. Some of the features of RLS, such as processing of sensations and activation of movement, may result from a dysfunction in spinal processing giving rise to a state of spinal hyperexcitability. In the current article we review studies investigating spinal excitability in RLS patients looking specifically at electrophysiological studies of spinal activity, sensory evaluations, and spinal reflex studies. Increased spinal excitability has been shown in RLS patients based on the combined data from electrophysiological studies. Results from studies assessing sensory evaluations in RLS patients show enhanced spinal processing of nociceptive inputs possibly due to central sensitisation. However, not all sensory modalities demonstrate an increase in sensitivity. An increase in nervous system excitability would result in an increase in reflex responses in RLS patients however the data from reflex analyses in RLS patients has failed to consistently show this expected result. Overall changes to RLS spinal excitability have been demonstrated though these changes might be heterogeneous as not all afferent input appears to be affected in the same manner. There may be phase-dependent and modality-dependent alterations in spinal excitability suggesting that the theory of absolute spinal hyperexcitability in RLS patients' needs to be reconsidered.

Plantar reflex excitability is increased in the evening in restless legs syndrome patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if diurnal changes in spinal excitability (plantar reflex) occur in restless legs syndrome (RLS) participants compared to healthy matched controls.

METHODS

Thirteen RLS participants and 13 healthy control participants' plantar reflex responses were evaluated in the evening (PM) and the morning (AM). Plantar reflex responses were assessed electromyographically, using motion analysis (kinematically) and by subjective nociception (Visual Analogue Scale).

RESULTS

RLS participants showed a circadian variation in plantar reflex responses whilst control participants did not. Evening ankle angle changes were larger and faster in RLS participants compared to morning responses. In addition RLS participants displayed significantly smaller change in ankle angle and significantly slower ankle movements in the evening and the morning as well as significantly lower lateral gastrocnemius maximum amplitude in the compared to control participants.

CONCLUSION

The findings of the current study support the theory of RLS circadian fluctuations in spinal excitability. An unexpected finding was decreased plantar reflex responses in RLS participants compared to healthy control participants. However this finding supports the theory of mechanical hypoesthesia in RLS. The results of this study provide further insight into the pathophysiology of RLS, highlighting that not all sensory processing is affected in the same manner.