1
|
Verdi S, Rutherford S, Fraza C, Tosun D, Altmann A, Raket LL, Schott JM, Marquand AF, Cole JH. Personalizing progressive changes to brain structure in Alzheimer's disease using normative modeling. Alzheimers Dement 2024. [PMID: 39234956 DOI: 10.1002/alz.14174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 07/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neuroanatomical normative modeling captures individual variability in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Here we used normative modeling to track individuals' disease progression in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and patients with AD. METHODS Cortical and subcortical normative models were generated using healthy controls (n ≈ 58k). These models were used to calculate regional z scores in 3233 T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging time-series scans from 1181 participants. Regions with z scores < -1.96 were classified as outliers mapped on the brain and summarized by total outlier count (tOC). RESULTS tOC increased in AD and in people with MCI who converted to AD and also correlated with multiple non-imaging markers. Moreover, a higher annual rate of change in tOC increased the risk of progression from MCI to AD. Brain outlier maps identified the hippocampus as having the highest rate of change. DISCUSSION Individual patients' atrophy rates can be tracked by using regional outlier maps and tOC. HIGHLIGHTS Neuroanatomical normative modeling was applied to serial Alzheimer's disease (AD) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data for the first time. Deviation from the norm (outliers) of cortical thickness or brain volume was computed in 3233 scans. The number of brain-structure outliers increased over time in people with AD. Patterns of change in outliers varied markedly between individual patients with AD. People with mild cognitive impairment whose outliers increased over time had a higher risk of progression from AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Verdi
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Saige Rutherford
- Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte Fraza
- Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Duygu Tosun
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Andre Altmann
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lars Lau Raket
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Jonathan M Schott
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Andre F Marquand
- Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - James H Cole
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gage AT, Stone JR, Wilde EA, McCauley SR, Welsh RC, Mugler JP, Tustison N, Avants B, Whitlow CT, Lancashire L, Bhatt SD, Haas M. Normative Neuroimaging Library: Designing a Comprehensive and Demographically Diverse Dataset of Healthy Controls to Support Traumatic Brain Injury Diagnostic and Therapeutic Development. J Neurotrauma 2024. [PMID: 39235436 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2024.0128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The past decade has seen impressive advances in neuroimaging, moving from qualitative to quantitative outputs. Available techniques now allow for the inference of microscopic changes occurring in white and gray matter, along with alterations in physiology and function. These existing and emerging techniques hold the potential of providing unprecedented capabilities in achieving a diagnosis and predicting outcomes for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and a variety of other neurological diseases. To see this promise move from the research lab into clinical care, an understanding is needed of what normal data look like for all age ranges, sex, and other demographic and socioeconomic categories. Clinicians can only use the results of imaging scans to support their decision-making if they know how the results for their patient compare with a normative standard. This potential for utilizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in TBI diagnosis motivated the American College of Radiology and Cohen Veterans Bioscience to create a reference database of healthy individuals with neuroimaging, demographic data, and characterization of psychological functioning and neurocognitive data that will serve as a normative resource for clinicians and researchers for development of diagnostics and therapeutics for TBI and other brain disorders. The goal of this article is to introduce the large, well-curated Normative Neuroimaging Library (NNL) to the research community. NNL consists of data collected from ∼1900 healthy participants. The highlights of NNL are (1) data are collected across a diverse population, including civilians, veterans, and active-duty service members with an age range (18-64 years) not well represented in existing datasets; (2) comprehensive structural and functional neuroimaging acquisition with state-of-the-art sequences (including structural, diffusion, and functional MRI; raw scanner data are preserved, allowing higher quality data to be derived in the future; standardized imaging acquisition protocols across sites reflect sequences and parameters often recommended for use with various neurological and psychiatric conditions, including TBI, post-traumatic stress disorder, stroke, neurodegenerative disorders, and neoplastic disease); and (3) the collection of comprehensive demographic details, medical history, and a broad structured clinical assessment, including cognition and psychological scales, relevant to multiple neurological conditions with functional sequelae. Thus, NNL provides a demographically diverse population of healthy individuals who can serve as a comparison group for brain injury study and clinical samples, providing a strong foundation for precision medicine. Use cases include the creation of imaging-derived phenotypes (IDPs), derivation of reference ranges of imaging measures, and use of IDPs as training samples for artificial intelligence-based biomarker development and for normative modeling to help identify injury-induced changes as outliers for precision diagnosis and targeted therapeutic development. On its release, NNL is poised to support the use of advanced imaging in clinician decision support tools, the validation of imaging biomarkers, and the investigation of brain-behavior anomalies, moving the field toward precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James R Stone
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Elisabeth A Wilde
- George E. Wahlen VA, Salt Lake City Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Stephen R McCauley
- Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Robert C Welsh
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - John P Mugler
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Nick Tustison
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Brian Avants
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Christopher T Whitlow
- Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | - Magali Haas
- Cohen Veterans Bioscience, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liang X, Sun L, Liao X, Lei T, Xia M, Duan D, Zeng Z, Li Q, Xu Z, Men W, Wang Y, Tan S, Gao JH, Qin S, Tao S, Dong Q, Zhao T, He Y. Structural connectome architecture shapes the maturation of cortical morphology from childhood to adolescence. Nat Commun 2024; 15:784. [PMID: 38278807 PMCID: PMC10817914 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-44863-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Cortical thinning is an important hallmark of the maturation of brain morphology during childhood and adolescence. However, the connectome-based wiring mechanism that underlies cortical maturation remains unclear. Here, we show cortical thinning patterns primarily located in the lateral frontal and parietal heteromodal nodes during childhood and adolescence, which are structurally constrained by white matter network architecture and are particularly represented using a network-based diffusion model. Furthermore, connectome-based constraints are regionally heterogeneous, with the largest constraints residing in frontoparietal nodes, and are associated with gene expression signatures of microstructural neurodevelopmental events. These results are highly reproducible in another independent dataset. These findings advance our understanding of network-level mechanisms and the associated genetic basis that underlies the maturational process of cortical morphology during childhood and adolescence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyuan Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
- IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
| | - Lianglong Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
- IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
| | - Xuhong Liao
- School of Systems Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
| | - Tianyuan Lei
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
- IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
| | - Mingrui Xia
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
- IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
| | - Dingna Duan
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
- IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
| | - Zilong Zeng
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
- IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
| | - Qiongling Li
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
- IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
| | - Zhilei Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
- IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
| | - Weiwei Men
- Center for MRI Research, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
- Beijing City Key Laboratory for Medical Physics and Engineering, Institute of Heavy Ion Physics, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
| | - Yanpei Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
| | - Shuping Tan
- Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, Peking University Huilongguan Clinical Medical School, Beijing, 100096, China
| | - Jia-Hong Gao
- Center for MRI Research, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
- Beijing City Key Laboratory for Medical Physics and Engineering, Institute of Heavy Ion Physics, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
- IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
| | - Shaozheng Qin
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
- IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
- Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Sha Tao
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
| | - Qi Dong
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
| | - Tengda Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
- IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
| | - Yong He
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
- IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
- Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing, 102206, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chopra S, Segal A, Oldham S, Holmes A, Sabaroedin K, Orchard ER, Francey SM, O’Donoghue B, Cropley V, Nelson B, Graham J, Baldwin L, Tiego J, Yuen HP, Allott K, Alvarez-Jimenez M, Harrigan S, Fulcher BD, Aquino K, Pantelis C, Wood SJ, Bellgrove M, McGorry PD, Fornito A. Network-Based Spreading of Gray Matter Changes Across Different Stages of Psychosis. JAMA Psychiatry 2023; 80:1246-1257. [PMID: 37728918 PMCID: PMC10512169 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.3293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
Importance Psychotic illness is associated with anatomically distributed gray matter reductions that can worsen with illness progression, but the mechanisms underlying the specific spatial patterning of these changes is unknown. Objective To test the hypothesis that brain network architecture constrains cross-sectional and longitudinal gray matter alterations across different stages of psychotic illness and to identify whether certain brain regions act as putative epicenters from which volume loss spreads. Design, Settings, and Participants This case-control study included 534 individuals from 4 cohorts, spanning early and late stages of psychotic illness. Early-stage cohorts included patients with antipsychotic-naive first-episode psychosis (n = 59) and a group of patients receiving medications within 3 years of psychosis onset (n = 121). Late-stage cohorts comprised 2 independent samples of people with established schizophrenia (n = 136). Each patient group had a corresponding matched control group (n = 218). A sample of healthy adults (n = 356) was used to derive representative structural and functional brain networks for modeling of network-based spreading processes. Longitudinal illness-related and antipsychotic-related gray matter changes over 3 and 12 months were examined using a triple-blind randomized placebo-control magnetic resonance imaging study of the antipsychotic-naive patients. All data were collected between April 29, 2008, and January 15, 2020, and analyses were performed between March 1, 2021, and January 14, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures Coordinated deformation models were used to estimate the extent of gray matter volume (GMV) change in each of 332 parcellated areas by the volume changes observed in areas to which they were structurally or functionally coupled. To identify putative epicenters of volume loss, a network diffusion model was used to simulate the spread of pathology from different seed regions. Correlations between estimated and empirical spatial patterns of GMV alterations were used to quantify model performance. Results Of 534 included individuals, 354 (66.3%) were men, and the mean (SD) age was 28.4 (7.4) years. In both early and late stages of illness, spatial patterns of cross-sectional volume differences between patients and controls were more accurately estimated by coordinated deformation models constrained by structural, rather than functional, network architecture (r range, >0.46 to <0.57; P < .01). The same model also robustly estimated longitudinal volume changes related to illness (r ≥ 0.52; P < .001) and antipsychotic exposure (r ≥ 0.50; P < .004). Network diffusion modeling consistently identified, across all 4 data sets, the anterior hippocampus as a putative epicenter of pathological spread in psychosis. Epicenters of longitudinal GMV loss were apparent in posterior cortex early in the illness and shifted to the prefrontal cortex with illness progression. Conclusion and Relevance These findings highlight a central role for white matter fibers as conduits for the spread of pathology across different stages of psychotic illness, mirroring findings reported in neurodegenerative conditions. The structural connectome thus represents a fundamental constraint on brain changes in psychosis, regardless of whether these changes are caused by illness or medication. Moreover, the anterior hippocampus represents a putative epicenter of early brain pathology from which dysfunction may spread to affect connected areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sidhant Chopra
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Ashlea Segal
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stuart Oldham
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alexander Holmes
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kristina Sabaroedin
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Radiology, Hotchkiss Brain Institute and Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, Hotchkiss Brain Institute and Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Edwina R. Orchard
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Child Study Centre, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Shona M. Francey
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Brian O’Donoghue
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vanessa Cropley
- Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Barnaby Nelson
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jessica Graham
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lara Baldwin
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeggan Tiego
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hok Pan Yuen
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kelly Allott
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mario Alvarez-Jimenez
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susy Harrigan
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Global and Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australian
| | - Ben D. Fulcher
- School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kevin Aquino
- School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Complex Systems, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christos Pantelis
- Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- NorthWestern Mental Health, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Western Health Sunshine Hospital, St Albans, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephen J. Wood
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Bellgrove
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Patrick D. McGorry
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alex Fornito
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Verdi S, Rutherford S, Fraza C, Tosun D, Altmann A, Raket LL, Schott JM, Marquand AF, Cole JH. Personalising Alzheimer's Disease progression using brain atrophy markers. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.06.15.23291418. [PMID: 37398392 PMCID: PMC10312850 DOI: 10.1101/2023.06.15.23291418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neuroanatomical normative modelling can capture individual variability in Alzheimer's Disease (AD). We used neuroanatomical normative modelling to track individuals' disease progression in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and patients with AD. METHODS Cortical thickness and subcortical volume neuroanatomical normative models were generated using healthy controls (n~58k). These models were used to calculate regional Z-scores in 4361 T1-weighted MRI time-series scans. Regions with Z-scores <-1.96 were classified as outliers and mapped on the brain, and also summarised by total outlier count (tOC). RESULTS Rate of change in tOC increased in AD and in people with MCI who converted to AD and correlated with multiple non-imaging markers. Moreover, a higher annual rate of change in tOC increased the risk of MCI progression to AD. Brain Z-score maps showed that the hippocampus had the highest rate of atrophy change. CONCLUSIONS Individual-level atrophy rates can be tracked by using regional outlier maps and tOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Verdi
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Saige Rutherford
- Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, 6525EN, the Netherlands
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, 6525EN, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte Fraza
- Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, 6525EN, the Netherlands
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, 6525EN, the Netherlands
| | - Duygu Tosun
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andre Altmann
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lars Lau Raket
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jonathan M Schott
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Andre F Marquand
- Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, 6525EN, the Netherlands
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, 6525EN, the Netherlands
| | - James H Cole
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|