Patterns of dysphagia and acute toxicities in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing helical IMRT±concurrent chemotherapy

Effects of Tongue Strength Training on Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Results From a Pilot Interventional Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients often have dysphagia following surgical and/or chemoradiation treatment, which can lead to reduced quality of life. Some patients suffer from decreased tongue strength and mobility that may cause discomfort and difficulty with swallowing. Our group has developed a patented genioglossus muscle strength trainer (GMST) to increase tongue protrusive force that has been used in patients with sleep apnea. We hypothesized that the GMST device would increase tongue strength in the HNC population.

METHODS

We conducted an IRB approved, non-randomized, interventional clinical trial of HNC patients with dysphagia to determine the effect of GMST on tongue strength. Our secondary objective was to assess dysphagia quality of life, as determined by questionnaires. Genioglossus muscle strength measurements (measured in Newtons, N) and dysphagia quality of life scores (SWAL-QoL questionnaire) were obtained from enrolled patients at baseline and following 4 weeks of intervention. Treatment was at-home GMST exercise regimen 3 times daily, 5 days per week. Compliance was assessed via review of training logs. Two-sided paired t-tests at significance level α = .05 were performed to assess difference in mean GG muscle strength pre- and post-treatment.

RESULTS

Out of 10 patients initially enrolled, 7 patients completed the trial. Eighty-six percent were male and the average age was 60. About 5 patients had surgery plus adjuvant radiation and 2 patients had primary radiation. All patients had baseline dysphagia as determined by patient complaint and/or objective measurement (prior modified barium swallow). No adverse events were reported. We observed a statistically significant increase in genioglossus muscle strength (mean change: 4.0 N, 95% CI 1.1-6.9, P = .015) after 4 weeks of treatment. Patients reported reduced swallowing burden and feeling of stigma around eating based on SWAL-QoL results.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that protrusive tongue-training exercises utilizing a novel tongue trainer device is well-tolerated and increases genioglossus muscle strength in treated HNC patients complaining of dysphagia. Patient-reported outcomes based on the SWAL-QoL survey indicate improvements in quality-of-life post-treatment, although our results are limited by small sample size. Larger studies are needed to see if this device could have clinically meaningful results for this difficult-to-treat patient population.

Effects of chemoradiation and tongue exercise on swallow biomechanics and bolus kinematics

BACKGROUND

Common treatments for head and neck cancer (radiation and chemotherapy) can lead to dysphagia; tongue exercise is a common intervention. This study aimed to assess swallow biomechanics and bolus kinematics using a well-established rat model of radiation or chemoradiation treatment to the tongue base, with or without tongue exercise intervention.

METHODS

Pre- and post-treatment videofluoroscopy was conducted on 32 male Sprague-Dawley rats treated with radiation/chemoradiation and exercise/no exercise. Rats in the exercise groups completed a progressive resistance tongue training paradigm. Swallow biomechanics, bolus kinematics, jaw opening, and post-swallow respiration were assessed.

RESULTS

Both treatments impacted outcome measures; the addition of exercise intervention showed benefit for some measures, particularly in rats treated with radiation, vs. chemoradiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation and chemoradiation can significantly affect aspects of deglutition; combined treatment may result in worse outcomes. Tongue exercise intervention can mitigate deficits; more intensive intervention may be warranted in proportion to combined treatment.

Dysphagia in Head and Neck Cancer

Dysphagia is a common symptom in patients with head and neck cancer that can significantly impact health outcomes and quality of life. The origin of dysphagia in these patients is often multifactorial, making diagnosis and management especially complex. The evaluating otolaryngologist should be well versed with the patient's neoplasm, comorbidities, and treatment history alongside dysphagia-specific imaging modalities. Management is often dynamic, requiring frequent monitoring, interprofessional collaboration, and a variety of supportive and invasive measures to achieve optimal outcomes.

Associations between Human Papillomavirus Status, Weight Change, and Survival of Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients

This study examined associations between HPV status and weight change in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). OPC patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy in Toronto, Canada were included. Relationships were assessed between HPV status and weight loss grade (WLG, combining weight loss and current body mass index); weight change during treatment; and HPV status and WLG/weight change on overall (OS) and cancer-specific (CSS) survival. Of 717 patients, WLG pre-radiation was less severe among HPV-positive compared to HPV-negative, though weight loss during treatment was greater. The adjusted odds ratio for greater WLG among HPV-positive versus HPV-negative was 0.47 (95%CI 0.28-0.78). Grade-4 WLG (worst category) experienced poorer OS and CSS (OS adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 4.08; 95%CI 1.48-11.2, compared to Grade-0); and was non-significant for HPV-negative (aHR 2.34; 95%CI 0.69-7.95). Relationships between weight change before/during treatment and survival had similar direction between HPV-positive and HPV-negative, but of greater magnitude in HPV-positive patients.

Enteral nutrition support and treatment toxicities in patients with head and neck cancer receiving definitive or adjuvant helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Enteral nutrition (EN) is often required in patients with head and neck cancer (HNSCC); however, initiation criteria is limited or inconsistent. This study aimed to describe the relationship of treatment toxicities and requirement for EN and investigate toxicity and baseline characteristics association with EN duration.

METHODS

Acute toxicities and baseline characteristics were collected from patients with HNSCC (n = 110) undergoing H-IMRT. Percentage EN contributing to estimated requirements and EN duration were measured.

RESULTS

The threshold for patients needing ≥50% of estimated requirements via EN increased from week 3 to 4 for grade ≥2 oral/pharyngeal mucositis, dysgeusia, thick saliva and nausea, and for grade 3 dysphagia. Patients with grade 2-3 dysphagia had a reduced risk of ceasing EN compared to those with grade 0-1 dysphagia.

CONCLUSIONS

Using acute toxicities in clinical practice may be a useful tool to inform prompt initiation of EN prior to decline in nutritional status and anticipate EN duration.

Brazilian organic propolis for prevention and treatment of radiation-related oral acute toxicities in head and neck cancer patients: A double-blind randomized clinical trial

Background: Oral mucositis (OM) is one of the most important acute toxicities from radiotherapy (RT) in head and neck cancer patients and can impair oncologic treatment. Dysphagia, dysgeusia, pain, and oral candidiasis are other common toxicities. Brazilian Organic Propolis (BOP) is a recently described propolis variant and BOP types 4 and 6 have shown important antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antifungal properties.

Purpose: To investigate the use of BOP as a preventive and/or complementary therapeutic option for radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis, dysphagia, dysgeusia, pain, and oral candidiasis. Additionally, proinflammatory cytokines were assessed to investigate their anti-inflammatory role.

Methods: Sixty patients were included in this randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Patients were randomized to receive either aqueous suspension of a BOP or placebo throughout RT. Also, all patients underwent low-level laser therapy as routine oral care. OM, dysphagia, and dysgeusia were assessed weekly according to WHO and NCI scales. Pain-related to OM was assessed according to a Visual Analog Scale and the presence or absence of oral candidiasis was checked by intraoral examination. Protein levels of TNF-α and IL-1β from oral mucosa were assessed by ELISA.

Results: Patients in the propolis group had a lower mean score of OM, dysphagia, dysgeusia, and most patients reported moderate pain. Fewer patients developed oral candidiasis in the propolis group, and the number of episodes was lower among patients that used BOP (p < 0.05). In addition, the BOP group presented significantly lower levels of IL-1β since the beginning of treatment when compared with placebo patients (p < 0.05) and a lower level of TNF-α at the end of treatment (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Topic use of BOP reduced TNF-α and IL-1β levels, oral candidiasis episodes, and seems to be a useful complementary option for the prevention and treatment of the main acute oral toxicities of RT.

Clinical Trial Registration:http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-9f8c78/, identifier RBR-9f8c78

Socio-demographic aspects and treatment-related factors on oral cancer patients' participation in rehabilitation

Objectives

After resection of an oral carcinoma, patients are faced with physical, psychological, and socioeconomic challenges. Rehabilitation plays an essential role in patients' reintegration into their social and professional environment. This study evaluated whether socioeconomic aspects affect oral cancer patients' participation in rehabilitation treatment.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted with 1,532 patients following surgical treatment of oral cancer during an international multicenter rehabilitation study of the German-Swiss-Austrian Cooperative Working Group on Maxillofacial Tumors using a questionnaire comprising disease-related and psychosocial items postoperatively and at least 6 months after surgery.

Results

Only 35.4% of patients participated in rehabilitation. Age (p<0.001), sex (p<0.001), and marital status (p<0.05) significantly influenced participation in rehabilitation. Postoperative impairment (p<0.05) as well as quality of life (p<0.01) were significantly worse in patients who participated in rehabilitation. Nevertheless, this group of patients returned to work significantly more often, although later, than those who did not participate in rehabilitation (p<0.05).

Conclusions

The findings show social inequalities and suggest a general undersupply of rehabilitative follow-up treatment in patients with oral cancer. More patients, especially older people and women should be referred to rehabilitation.

Post-acute health care needs of people with head and neck cancer: Mapping health care services, experiences, and the impact of rurality

BACKGROUND

People with head and neck cancer (HNC) have complex health care needs; however, limited evidence exists regarding the nature or patterns of service access and use. This study explored the post-discharge health care needs and experiences of individuals with HNC from metropolitan and rural areas.

METHODS

Health care appointments and services accessed by people with HNC were collated for 6-month post-treatment. Data analysis of the whole cohort examined patterns of access while journey mapping integrated participants' experiences of recovery.

RESULTS

The 6-month service access journey was mapped for 11 people. Rural participants attended a significantly greater number of appointments (p = 0.012), higher canceled/missed appointments (p = 0.013), and saw more professionals (p = 0.007). Rural participants reported higher stress and burden due to service access barriers and unmet needs.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple challenges and inequities exist for rural people with HNC. Findings inform opportunities to enhance the post-treatment recovery of people with HNC in rural areas.

Impact of Delay on Hospitalization in Older Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of delay in treatment initiation on hospitalization, overall survival, and recurrence in older patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective multicenter study.

SETTING

Two tertiary referral centers.

METHODS

All patients with newly diagnosed HNC (≥60 years) treated between 2015 and 2017 were retrospectively included. Time-to-treatment intervals were assessed (ie, calendar days between first visit and start of treatment). Multiple multivariable models were performed with hospital admission days (>14 days), survival, and recurrence as dependent outcome variables.

RESULTS

In total, 525 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 70.7 years and 70.7% were male. Median time to treatment was 34.0 days, and 36.3% started treatment within 30 days (P = .576 between centers). Patients with radiotherapy had longer time to treatment than surgical patients (39.0 vs 29.0 days, P < .001). Current smoking status, stage IV tumors, and definitive radiotherapy were significantly associated with delay in the multivariable analysis. Time-to-treatment interval ≥30 days was a significant predictor of longer hospital admission (>14 days) in the first year after treatment in an adjusted model (odds ratio, 4.66 [95% CI, 2.59-8.37]; P < .001). Delay in treatment initiation was not associated with overall survival or tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the importance and challenges of ensuring timely treatment initiation in older patients with HNC, as treatment delay was an independent predictor of hospitalization. During oncologic workup, taking time to consider patient-centered outcomes (including minimizing time spent in hospital) while ensuring timely start of treatment requires well-structured, fast-track care pathways.

Association Between Objective Ratings of Swallowing and Dysphagia-Specific Quality of Life in Patients Receiving (Chemo)radiotherapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer

The pervasive nature of dysphagia in the head/neck cancer (HNC) population necessitates a comprehensive evaluation approach, including both objective assessment of dysphagia, and subjective patient-reported functional measures. However, the congruence between clinician-rated and patient-perceived function is still not well understood. The current study investigated the association between objective clinician-rated swallow physiology (using the MBSImP) and patient-reported measures of swallowing-related quality of life (using the MDADI) in a secondary analysis of patients with oropharyngeal HNC treated with (chemo)radiotherapy. Seventy-nine patients with oropharyngeal HNC receiving (chemo)radiotherapy completed a standardised videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) rated using the MBSImP, and the MDADI, at pre-treatment (baseline), 6 weeks and 3 months post-treatment as per a previous prospective RCT. Data on n = 67 participants were analysed as part of the secondary analysis. Association between MBSImP oral and pharyngeal composite scores versus MDADI Global and subscale scores was examined using ordinary least squares regression and mixed-effects general linear modelling (GLM). Univariable analyses demonstrated significant associations between MBSImP oral composite scores and each of the MDADI subscales, as well as the MBSImP pharyngeal composite scores and all MDADI subscales. GLM analysis revealed significant associations were maintained between MBSImP pharyngeal scores and the MDADI global and emotional subscale scores at the multivariable level, with the physical subscale trending towards significance. No significant association was observed between the MBSImP oral composite scores and any of the MDADI subscales at the multivariable level. This study found significant associations between objective measures of pharyngeal swallow physiology and patient-perceived swallowing-related quality of life. These findings suggest a higher degree of concordance between clinician-rated and patient-reported measures up to 3 months post-(C)RT than previously reported.

Symptom Clusters in Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Model

OBJECTIVE

The two approaches to symptom-cluster research include grouping symptoms and grouping patients. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the conceptual approaches and methodologies used in symptom-cluster research in patients with head and neck cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Articles were retrieved from electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE via Ovid, APA PsycINFO, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials-CENTRAL), five grey literature portals, and Google Scholar. Seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria. Eight studies grouped symptoms to identify symptom clusters, of which two used qualitative methods. The number of symptom clusters ranged from two to five, and the number of symptoms in a cluster ranged from 2 to 11. Nine studies grouped patients based on their experiences with multiple symptoms. Cluster analysis and factor analysis were most commonly used. Despite variable names and composition of symptom clusters, synthesis revealed three prominent symptom clusters: general, head and neck cancer-specific, and gastrointestinal. Being female and quality of life were significantly associated with high symptom group or cluster severity. Biological mechanisms were sparsely examined.

CONCLUSION

Symptom cluster research in head and neck cancer is emerging. Consensus on nomenclature of a symptom cluster will facilitate deduction of core clinically relevant symptom clusters in head and neck cancer. Further research is required on understanding patients' subjective experiences, identifying predictors and outcomes, and underlying mechanisms for symptom clusters.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Identification of clinically relevant symptom clusters would enable targeted symptom assessment and management strategies, thus improving treatment efficiencies and patient outcomes.

Identifying Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for Routine Surveillance of Physical and Emotional Symptoms in Head and Neck Cancer Populations: A Systematic Review

The aims of this review were to identify symptoms experienced by head and neck cancer (HNC) patients and their prevalence, as well as to compare symptom coverage identified in HNC specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Searches of Ovid Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, and CINAHL were conducted to identify studies. The search revealed 4569 unique articles and identified 115 eligible studies. The prevalence of reported symptoms was highly variable among included studies. Variability in sample size, timing of the assessments, and the use of different measures was noted across studies. Content mapping of commonly used PROMs showed variability and poor capture of prevalent symptoms, even though validation studies confirmed satisfactory reliability and validity. This suggests limitations of some of the tools in providing an accurate and comprehensive picture of the patient's symptoms and problems.

Modelling Radiation-Induced Salivary Dysfunction during IMRT and Chemotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Radiation-induced xerostomia is one of the most prevalent adverse effects of head and neck cancer treatment, and it could seriously affect patients' qualities of life. It results primarily from damage to the salivary glands, but its onset and severity may also be influenced by other patient-, tumour-, and treatment-related factors. We aimed to build and validate a predictive model for acute salivary dysfunction (aSD) for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients by combining clinical and dosimetric factors.

METHODS

A cohort of consecutive NPC patients treated curatively with IMRT and chemotherapy at 70 Gy (2-2.12 Gy/fraction) were utilised. Parotid glands (cPG, considered as a single organ) and the oral cavity (OC) were selected as organs-at-risk. The aSD was assessed at baseline and weekly during RT, grade ≥ 2 aSD chosen as the endpoint. Dose-volume histograms were reduced to the Equivalent Uniform Dose (EUD). Dosimetric and clinical/treatment features selected via LASSO were inserted into a multivariable logistic model. Model validation was performed on two cohorts of patients with prospective aSD, and scored using the same schedule/scale: a cohort (NPC_V) of NPC patients (as in model training), and a cohort of mixed non-NPC head and neck cancer patients (HNC_V).

RESULTS

The model training cohort included 132 patients. Grade ≥ 2 aSD was reported in 90 patients (68.2%). Analyses resulted in a 4-variables model, including doses of up to 98% of cPG (cPG_D98%, OR = 1.04), EUD to OC with n = 0.05 (OR = 1.11), age (OR = 1.08, 5-year interval) and smoking history (OR = 1.37, yes vs. no). Calibration was good. The NPC_V cohort included 38 patients, with aSD scored in 34 patients (89.5%); the HNC_V cohort included 93 patients, 77 with aSD (92.8%). As a general observation, the incidence of aSD was significantly different in the training and validation populations (p = 0.01), thus impairing calibration-in-the-large. At the same time, the effect size for the two dosimetric factors was confirmed. Discrimination was also satisfactory in both cohorts: AUC was 0.73, and 0.68 in NPC_V and HNC_V cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSION

cPG D98% and the high doses received by small OC volumes were found to have the most impact on grade ≥ 2 acute xerostomia, with age and smoking history acting as a dose-modifying factor. Findings on the development population were confirmed in two prospectively collected validation populations.

Nutrition Impact Symptom Clusters in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Receiving Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to identify the nutrition impact symptom (NIS) clusters in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and explore their relationships with the weight loss rate (WLR).

METHODS

This longitudinal study included 169 patients. At baseline (T₁), the demographics, clinical information, and weight before radiotherapy (RT) were recorded. At the third week (T₂) and the end of RT (T₃), we assessed the weight, prevalence, severity, and interference of the NIS with the Head and Neck Patient Symptom Checklist. The mean scores of the severity of NIS at T₂ and T₃ were used as a whole to perform the exploratory factor analysis and identify the symptom clusters. Cronbach's α coefficient was used to evaluate the internal consistency of the symptom clusters. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze the relationships between clusters and the WLR.

RESULTS

We extracted three clusters from 14 NISs: the RT-specific symptom cluster including pain, difficulty swallowing, oral mucositis, thick saliva, difficulty chewing, and dry mouth (Cronbach's α = 0.820); the gastrointestinal symptom cluster including nausea, loss of appetite, feeling full, vomiting, and taste change (Cronbach's α = 0.592); the psychological status cluster including depressed, anxious, and lack of energy (Cronbach's α = 0.710). The multivariable model showed that participants with more serious RT-specific symptom cluster (β = 1.020, 95% CI: 0.570-1.471, P < 0.001) had higher WLR.

CONCLUSIONS

The NIS had close internal connections with each other, so the strategies applied by healthcare professionals should focus on multiple related symptoms, especially to manage the RT-specific symptom cluster.

Frailty and restrictions in geriatric domains are associated with surgical complications but not with radiation-induced acute toxicity in head and neck cancer patients: A prospective study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the association between frailty screening and geriatric assessment (GA) on short term adverse events in patients treated for head and neck cancer (HNC) for the first time in a prospective study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Newly diagnosed HNC patients undergoing curative treatment were prospectively included in OncoLifeS, a data biobank. Prior to the start of treatment, frailty was assessed with a GA, Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) and Geriatric-8 (G8). The GA included comorbidity (Adult Comorbidity Evaluation - 27), nutritional status (Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool), functional status ((instrumental) Activities of Daily Living), mobility (Timed Up & Go), psychological (Geriatric Depression Scale 15) and cognitive (Mini Mental State Examination) measures. Clinically relevant postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade 2) and acute radiation-induced toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 ≥ grade 2) were defined as outcome measures. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed, yielding odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs).

RESULTS

Of the 369 included patients, 259 patients were eligible for analysis. Postoperative complications occurred in 41/148 (27.7%) patients and acute radiation-induced toxicity was present in 86/160 (53.7%) patients. Number of deficit domains of GA (OR = 1.71, 95%CI = 1.14-2.56), GFI (OR = 2.54, 95%CI = 1.02-6.31) and G8 (OR5.59, 95%CI = 2.14-14.60) were associated with postoperative complications, but not with radiation-induced toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Frailty and restrictions in geriatric domains were associated with postoperative complications, but not with radiation-induced acute toxicity in curatively treated HNC patients. The results of this prospective study further emphasizes the importance of geriatric evaluation, particularly before surgery.

Functional results of swallowing and aspiration after oral cancer treatment and microvascular free flap reconstruction: A retrospective observational assessment

This study aimed to assess the functional swallowing outcomes in cohort of oral cancer patients treated with tumor resection and reconstruction by means of microvascular free flaps. Duration from onset to the last examination was classified into three periods: less than 12 months, from 13 to 24 months, and more than 24 months. Type of feeding, dysphagia, and laryngeal aspiration were the dependent variables, and the study was mainly focused on the data from the multivariate analysis. Fifty-one patients were included in the study. Twenty-one patients had dysphagia, 11 showed stasis in vallecula and pyriform sinuses, 9 experienced laryngeal penetration, and 8 aspirations. Surgery combined with radiochemotherapy was associated with a higher prevalence of dysphagia (p = 0.03). Frequency of dysphagia was higher in the first year after treatment and less frequent after 24 months (p = 0.003). Dysphagia was associated with laryngeal penetration (p = 0.001), and this with aspiration (p < 0.0005). In conclusion, as it seems that the method of reconstruction has a major influence on swallowing, when there are relevant alternatives in the way the reconstruction is done, always the approach should be chosen that reduces dysphagia to a minimum.

Longitudinal comparisons of a whole-mouth taste test to clinician-rated and patient-reported outcomes of dysgeusia postradiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer and associations with oral intake

BACKGROUND

After head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment, dysgeusia may be a barrier to oral intake. In this exploratory study, we prospectively examined taste perception, clinician-rated (CRO) and patient-reported (PRO) taste changes and their effect on oral intake postradiotherapy.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients were assessed at baseline, treatment weeks 2 and 4, and 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment using a whole-mouth taste test and associated CRO and subjective PRO measures.

RESULTS

Greater taste impairment was reflected by subjective than by a whole-mouth taste test. The most significant and consistent decline occurred mid-treatment. The Chemotherapy-Induced Taste Alteration Scale (PRO) discomfort subscale correlated significantly with maintaining an oral diet, percent of oral intake, and appetite level from mid-treatment to 6 months post-treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

PRO results indicated ongoing oral intake issues. Whole-mouth taste tests may fail to fully reflect functional taste-loss. Dysgeusia prevention and treatment methods are needed to improve patient outcomes.

Mapping Health-Related Quality of Life, Anxiety, and Depression in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosed with Malnutrition Defined by GLIM

Patients with cancer deal with problems related to physical, psychological, social, and emotional functions. The aim was to investigate malnutrition defined by the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in relation to health-related quality of life, anxiety, and depression in patients with head and neck cancer. This was a prospective observational research study with 273 patients followed at the start of treatment, seven weeks, and one year. Data collection included nutritional status and support, and the questionnaires: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and neck cancer module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Malnutrition was defined using the GLIM criteria. The study showed that patients with malnutrition had significantly greater deterioration in their health-related quality of life at seven weeks. On a group level, health-related quality of life was most severe at this time point and some scores still implied problems at one year. Significantly, more patients reported anxiety at the start of treatment whereas significantly more patients reported depression at seven weeks. Over the trajectory of care, the need for support often varies. Psychosocial support is imperative and at the end of treatment extra focus should be put on nutritional interventions and managing treatment-related symptoms to improve nutritional status and health-related quality of life. In the long-term, head and neck cancer survivors need help to find strategies to cope with the remaining sequel.

Burden of acute toxicities in head-and-neck radiation therapy: A single-institutional experience

Introduction:

Combined modality therapy is the standard of care in locally advanced head-and-neck cancer (HNC). The incidence of acute toxicities increases with additional therapy. The present study investigated the incidence and patterns of mucositis, dysphagia, aspiration, feeding tube use, admission for supportive care, and treatment compliance in patients with HNC treated curatively with radiation therapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy.

Methods and Material:

A retrospective review of 164 consecutive HNC patients treated with RT at St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, from January 2013 to June 2017 was done.

Results:

A total of 148 HNC patients were treated with a curative intent and 122 (82.4%) were locally advanced HNC. Combined Modality treatment was received by 119 (80.4%) patients. Eighty-four (56.7%) patients were treated by concurrent chemo-radiation. IMRT technique was used in 125 (84.5%) patients. The incidence of grade 3-4 mucositis, dysphagia and aspiration was 25%, 46%, and 10%, respectively. Nasogastric tube feeding was necessitated in 18.9% (n=28) and 27% (n = 40) required inpatient admission for supportive care. Twenty-nine (19.6%) patients did not complete planned RT dose and 46 (31%) patients had unscheduled RT break (>2days). Fifty-six (66.7%) patients did not receive planned chemotherapy.

Conclusions:

Acute toxicity due to RT in HNC remains a challenge despite using modern techniques. A significant proportion of patients require supportive therapy for more than 12 weeks and did not complete the scheduled treatment.

Validation of the Chinese version of chemotherapy-induced Taste Alteration Scale among patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To validate the Chinese version of the Chemotherapy-induced Taste Alteration Scale (CiTAS) among patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

Patients with HNC undergoing RT were enrolled from a cancer hospital. Data were collected by face-to-face interview. Patients' subjective taste alterations (TAs) were assessed by the CiTAS. The content validity was evaluated by five experts. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis were used to assess construct validity. Convergent validity was assessed by the correlation between the CiTAS score and the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) score. A single-item subjective intensity taste alteration question and quartiles of RT duration were used to assess the discriminant validity. The reliability was assessed by the Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

253 patients participated this investigation and 25 patients completed twice. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the original CiTAS structure with four dimensions was not applicable to patients with HNC undergoing RT. The Chinese version of modified-CiTAS (m-CiTAS) retained 17 items (the item "bothered by the smell of food" was deleted) loading onto three factors: decline in taste, discomfort, and phantogeusia and parageusia. The m-CiTAS showed acceptable correlations with the QLQ-C30. It could effectively discriminate the intensity of subjective TAs according to the single-item question and quartiles of RT duration. The m-CiTAS showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.573-0.958) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.726-0.831, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese version of m-CiTAS is an acceptable and applicable instrument to evaluate TAs among patients with HNC undergoing RT.

Eat All Through Radiation Therapy (EAT-RT): Structured therapy model to facilitate continued oral intake through head and neck radiotherapy-User acceptance and content validation

BACKGROUND

To develop and examine user acceptance and content validity of a structured program to facilitate safe but challenging oral intake during radiotherapy (RT) delivered by a speech language pathologist (SLP)-the Eat-All Through Radiation Therapy (EAT-RT) program.

METHODS

EAT-RT was developed through expert consensus of SLPs at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Canada) and M D Anderson Cancer Center using a conceptual framework of a diet hierarchy and a mealtime routine. EAT-RT was refined by practicing SLPs, and then disseminated for a 4-week clinical pilot at seven sites who were subsequently invited to participate in an online survey.

RESULTS

Twelve SLPs from six sites piloted EAT-RT therapy with a median of eight patients (IQR: 2-15) before and/or during RT. All SLPs reported EAT-RT added value to their practice, harmonized well with exercises, and its content was helpful; 11 (92%) reported EAT-RT facilitated patient understanding and indicated the desire to continue using EAT-RT.

CONCLUSION

The EAT-RT program was accepted by North American SLPs. The findings support the content and value of EAT-RT to facilitate oral intake in patients with head and neck cancer throughout RT.

The natural history of weight and swallowing outcomes in oropharyngeal cancer patients following radiation or concurrent chemoradiation therapy

PURPOSE

Patients treated for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) are at increased risk for functional decline due to cancer-related impairments and treatment toxicities, often leading to recommendations for enteral nutritional support. This study investigated the natural history of weight and swallowing outcomes in patients with and without feeding tube (FT) placement.

METHODS

Data were collected from electronic medical records of OPC patients treated with (chemo)radiotherapy at a single regional cancer center between January 2013 and December 2015. Weight measurements, Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) scores, Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) normalcy of diet scores, and M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) composite scores were gathered at baseline and at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-treatment. Patients were grouped based on FT placement and change over time was assessed using linear mixed effects analysis.

RESULTS

Of 122 eligible patients, 38 (31.1%) received a FT (FT group). Compared with baseline, weight decreased significantly at 3 and 6 months in both groups and at 12 months for patients without a FT (NFT group). Swallowing-related quality of life (QoL) decreased significantly at 3 and 6 months only in the NFT group.

CONCLUSION

OPC patients experience clinically relevant decreases in weight and swallowing-related QoL in the first-year post-treatment irrespective of FT placement. These findings will contribute to improved patient monitoring and communication within the clinical setting which may ultimately lead to better outcomes for those with OPC.

Pharyngeal Swallowing Pressures in Patients with Radiation-Associated Dysphagia

Dysphagia associated with radiotherapy for head and neck cancer is complex and can be difficult to treat. Videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS) are the current gold-standard instrumented swallow assessment. High-resolution manometry (HRM) is an additional approach that provides objective measurements of swallowing-related pressures in the pharynx and esophagus. This can provide functional information on the pressure gradients underlying bolus propulsion, and is relevant for this patient population, where radiation-related fibrosis can lead to weakness and impaired pressure generation. The purpose of this preliminary study was to describe pharyngeal swallowing pressures in patients with radiation-associated dysphagia (RAD) and late radiation-associated dysphagia (LRAD) using HRM. RAD occurs during and immediately following treatment, whereas LRAD is a more recently described phenomenon in which the patient experiences an onset of dysphagia at least 5 years post-treatment. We performed a retrospective analysis of pharyngeal swallowing pressures from 21 patients with RAD or LRAD and 21 healthy sex/age-matched controls. Patients with RAD or LRAD exhibited decreased swallowing pressure durations throughout the pharynx (p ≤ 0.002), as well as decreased hypopharynx maximum pressure (p = 0.003) and pharyngeal contractile integral ( p < 0.0001). Understanding how pharyngeal pressure generation is altered in patients with a history of radiotherapy can help clinicians form more precise treatment plans.

The impact of an educational video about radiotherapy and its toxicities in head and neck cancer patients. Evaluation of patients' understanding, anxiety, depression, and quality of life

OBJECTIVES

Head and neck radiotherapy can cause several toxicities, and its management has important treatment implications. Proper information about treatment is crucial to assist patients by preparing them and enhancing their ability to manage their illness. Thus, this study aimed to verify the impact of an educational video on the improvement of the patient's understanding, satisfaction, quality of life, and influence on their emotional state in different moments of treatment.

METHODS

A 10 min video about head and neck radiotherapy and its toxicities was produced. A prospective randomized clinical trial was performed in two groups: a control group (n = 65), which received standard verbal and written information, and an experimental group (n = 65), which received standard information and the video. Appropriated questionnaires (HADS, UW-QOLv4, IRTU, and Post-RTU) were applied in four different moments in order to evaluate patients' understanding, anxiety, depression, and quality of life.

RESULTS

The video improved the understanding of treatment and its side effects. Also, the video group reported better awareness about oral health care during the treatment. Osteoradionecrosis and radiation-related caries were the most unknown side effects. On the other hand, the educational video did not modify the patients' anxiety, depression, and quality of life. All patients reported high satisfaction with the video.

CONCLUSIONS

Audiovisual tools may improve patients' understanding of radiotherapy and were shown to be a useful tool when used in association with verbal and written information in cancer centers. In addition, information about osteoradionecrosis and radiation-related caries must be reinforced to patients.

Frequency and Evolution of Acute Oral Complications in Patients Undergoing Radiochemotherapy Treatment for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Despite its effectiveness, radiochemotherapy treatment in the head and neck region is accompanied by acute oral complications such as oral mucositis, dysphagia, xerostomia, and dysgeusia. The aim of this study was to analyze and prospectively assess the frequency and evolution of acute oral complications during radiochemotherapy in patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region. We have analyzed oral complications of 20 patients during 6 weeks of radiochemotherapy treatment for squamous cell carcinoma. Oral mucositis was evaluated according to the World Health Organization criteria, dysphagia, and dysgeusia according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, and xerostomia according to parameters set by the Seminars in Radiation Oncology. Mucositis was first observed in the second week and all patients presented some degree of mucositis in the fourth week of radiotherapy. Xerostomia and dysphagia were initially reported already in the first week of radiotherapy. All patients presented xerostomia in the fourth week; however, dysphagia was observed in all patients, only in the sixth week. Dysgeusia was first observed in the second week, becoming more severe in the third week. Acute oral complications can be observed throughout the treatment, but the third week of radiotherapy seems to represent a critical week, regardless of the grade of the complication. The sixth week presents the worst grades of these complications. Knowledge about the natural course of oral complications during radiotherapy is important to develop better strategies for treatment and improve the patients' quality of life.

Utilization of rehabilitation services in patients with head and neck cancer in the United States: A SEER-Medicare analysis

BACKGROUND

Head and neck cancer (HNC) and its treatment lead to functional impairments. Rehabilitation by speech-language pathology (SLP) and occupational/physical therapy (OT/PT) can decrease morbidity.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data for patients with HNC diagnosed between 2002 and 2011 was utilized to evaluate posttreatment rehabilitation.

RESULTS

In 16 194 patients, the overall utilization rate was 20.7% for SLP and 26.2% for OT/PT services. Treatment modality was significantly associated rehabilitation utilization. Compared to patients treated with primary surgery, those treated with primary radiotherapy had significantly lower odds of OT/PT utilization. Patients treated with surgery plus adjuvant treatment and primary concurrent chemoradiation had higher odds of SLP utilization compared to patients treated with surgery alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Rehabilitation services appeared to be underutilized by patients with HNC in the United States and vary with treatment modality. There is a need to improve integration of rehabilitation services into the HNC care continuum.

SUMMARY

Rehabilitation services are underutilized by patients with HNC during posttreatment surveillance in the United States. Treatment modality significantly impacts rehabilitation utilization patterns.

The prevalence of patient-reported dysphagia and oral complications in cancer patients

PURPOSE

Research investigating swallowing problems (dysphagia) and complications within the oral cavity in non-head and neck cancer patients is limited. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of patient-reported dysphagia and oral complications in all cancer patients and to examine the relationships between cancer types, oral complications and dysphagia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted at a specialist cancer centre in Australia. Data on patient-reported dysphagia and oral complications were collected using the Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey (version 2.0) which was completed by participants in one of three settings: inpatients, ambulatory patients receiving chemotherapy, or ambulatory patients receiving radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Data were collected on 239 patients, receiving treatment for 14 cancer types. The proportion of patients who reported dysphagic symptoms were as follows: any dysphagia (54%); dysphagia for liquids (20%); and dysphagia for solids (46%). Significantly more head and neck patients and significantly fewer breast patients reported dysphagia, but there were no differences between other tumour types. Oral symptoms across all cancer types were reported at the following rates: taste changes (62%); xerostomia (56%); voice changes (37%); smell changes (35%); thick mucous (33%); difficulty with teeth/dentures (25%); mouth/throat pain (20%); and trismus (19%).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first time comprehensive data on dysphagia and oral complications across all cancer patients have been collected. We have identified that dysphagic symptoms and oral complications-which have implications for quality of life and function-are common in all cancer patients, not just those with head and neck cancer.

[How to reconcile therapeutic patient education and care pathology in oncology: Application in head and neck neoplams]

Therapeutic education is an educational approach that allows the patient and his entourage to acquire or maintain the skills necessary to manage their daily lives. It requires a global care of patients and caregivers and is much broader than a learning of technical gesture. While their development is encouraged in the plan cancer 2014-2018, few programs exist in cancer surgery because the process is very cumbersome to implement due to a very strict administrative framework. In the absence of permission from the Regional health agency, "therapeutic education" term should not be used under penalty of a fine. The aim of this article is to present the principles and rules of therapeutic education defined by the french « Haute Autorité de Santé » and to illustrate them through the example of our therapeutic education program for patients with tracheostomy and/or gastrostomy. The patient pathway with the chronology, the speakers, the competency references, the possible interactions with the announcement scheme as desired by the French National Cancer Institute are specified. This information will facilitate the filling of the program authorization in order to participate in the development of therapeutic education in our specialty.

Optimising Radiation Therapy Dose to the Swallowing Organs at Risk: An In Silico Study of feasibility for Patients with Oropharyngeal Tumours

Recent evidence suggests that reducing radiotherapy dose delivered to specific anatomical swallowing structures [Swallowing Organs at Risk (SWOARs)] may improve swallowing outcomes post-treatment for patients with head and neck cancer. However, for those patients with tumours of the oropharynx, which typically directly overlap the SWOARs, reducing dose to these structures may be unachievable without compromising on the treatment of the disease. To assess the feasibility of dose reduction in this cohort, standard IMRT plans (ST-IMRT) and plans with reduced dose to the SWOARs (SW-IMRT) were generated for 25 oropharyngeal cancer patients (Brouwer et al. in Radiother Oncol 117(1):83-90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.041 , 2015; Christianen et al. in Radiother Oncol 101(3):394-402, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.015 , 2011). ST-IMRT and SW-IMRT plans were compared for: mean dose to the SWOARs, volume of pharynx and larynx receiving 50 Gy and 60 Gy (V50 and V60 respectively) and overlap between the tumour volume and the SWOARs. Additionally, two different SWOARs delineation guidelines (Brouwer et al. in Radiother Oncol 117(1):83-90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.041 , 2015; Christianen et al. in Radiother Oncol 101(3):394-402, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.015 , 2011) were used to highlight differences in calculated volumes between existing contouring guidelines. Agreement in SWOARs volumes between the two guidelines was calculated using a concordance index (CI). Despite a large overlap between the tumour and SWOARs, significant (p < 0.05) reductions in mean dose to 4 of the 5 SWOARs, and V50/V60 for the pharynx and larynx were achieved with SW-IMRT plans. Low CIs per structure (0.15-0.45) were found between the two guidelines highlighting issues comparing data between studies when different guidelines have been used (Hawkins et al. in Semin Radiat Oncol 28(1):46-52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2017.08.002 , 2018; Brodin et al. in Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 100(2):391-407, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.09.041 , 2018). This study found reducing dose to the SWOARs is a feasible practice for patients with oropharyngeal cancer. However, future prospective research is needed to determine if the extent of dose reduction achieved equates to clinical benefits.

Radiotherapy for cutaneous head and neck cancer and parotid tumours: a prospective investigation of treatment-related acute swallowing and toxicity patterns

PURPOSE

Reports of acute treatment-related dysphagia and toxicities for patients with parotid tumours or cutaneous head and neck cancer (HNC) are limited. This study aimed to describe the severity and timing of dysphagia and related toxicities experienced during radiotherapy for cutaneous HNC and parotid tumours, to inform the nature of future speech pathology (SP) service models required during treatment.

METHODS

Prospective study of 32 patients with parotid tumours and 36 with cutaneous HNC undergoing curative non-surgical management. Dysphagia and acute toxicity data was collected weekly during treatment and at 2, 4 and 12 weeks post-treatment using the Functional Oral Intake Scale, diet descriptors and CTCAE v4.0.

RESULTS

In both groups, minimal treatment toxicities (grades 0-1) were observed. Xerostomia and dysgeusia were the most frequently reported grade 2 toxicities. Only 3% of parotid patients and 6% with cutaneous HNC experienced grade 3 dysphagia. Full or soft texture diets were maintained by > 70% of patients in both groups. Symptoms peaked in the final week of treatment and rapidly improved thereafter. Apart from xerostomia < 10% of patients had any grade 2 toxicity at 12 weeks post-treatment.

CONCLUSION

Patients in these subgroups of HNC experienced minimal treatment-related toxicity during radiotherapy. As such, the need for supportive symptom management by SP is low. Models that involve interdisciplinary surveillance of symptoms with referral to SP only when required may be best suited for these individuals to ensure issues are identified whilst minimising patient burden created by unnecessary routine SP appointments.

Home-based telehealth service for swallowing and nutrition management following head and neck cancer treatment

Introduction

Following (chemo)radiotherapy (C/RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC), patients return to hospital for regular outpatient reviews with speech pathology (SP) and nutrition and dietetics (ND) for acute symptom monitoring, nutritional management, and swallowing and communication rehabilitation. The aim of the current study was to determine the feasibility of a home-based telehealth model for delivering SP and ND reviews, to provide patients with more convenient access to these appointments.

Methods

Service outcomes, costs, and consumer satisfaction were examined across 30 matched participants: 15 supported via the standard model of care (SMOC), and 15 via the home-based telehealth model of care (TMOC).

Results

All patients were successfully managed via telehealth. The TMOC was more efficient, with a reduced number ( p < 0.003) and duration ( p < 0.01) of appointments required until discharge. Significant patient cost savings ( p = 0.002) were reported for the TMOC due to decreased travel requirements. While staff costs were reduced, additional telehealth equipment levies resulted in a lower but non-significant overall cost difference to the health service when using the TMOC. High satisfaction was reported by all participants attending the TMOC.

Discussion

The findings support the feasibility of a home-based telehealth model for conducting SP and ND reviews post C/RT for HNC.

Grading Dysphagia as a Toxicity of Head and Neck Cancer: Differences in Severity Classification Based on MBS DIGEST and Clinical CTCAE Grades

Clinician-reported toxicity grading through common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) stages dysphagia based on symptoms, diet, and tube dependence. The new dynamic imaging grade of swallowing toxicity (DIGEST) tool offers a similarly scaled five-point ordinal summary grade of pharyngeal swallowing as determined through results of a modified barium swallow (MBS) study. This study aims to inform clinicians on the similarities and differences between dysphagia severity according to clinical CTCAE and MBS-derived DIGEST grading. A cross-sectional sample of 95 MBS studies was randomly selected from a prospectively-acquired MBS database among patients treated with organ preservation strategies for head and neck cancer. MBS DIGEST and clinical CTCAE dysphagia grades were compared. DIGEST and CTCAE dysphagia grades had "fair" agreement per weighted κ of 0.358 (95% CI .231-.485). Using a threshold of DIGEST ≥ 3 as reference, CTCAE had an overall sensitivity of 0.50, specificity of 0.84, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.67 to identify severe MBS-detected dysphagia. At less than 6 months, sensitivity was 0.72, specificity was 0.76, and AUC was 0.75 while at greater than 6 months, sensitivity was 0.22, specificity was 0.90, and AUC was 0.56 for CTCAE to detect dysphagia as determined by DIGEST. Classification of pharyngeal dysphagia on MBS using DIGEST augments our understanding of dysphagia severity according to the clinically-derived CTCAE while maintaining the simplicity of an ordinal scale. DIGEST likely complements CTCAE toxicity grading through improved specificity for physiologic dysphagia in the acute phase and improved sensitivity for dysphagia in the late-phase.

Randomised controlled trial of early prophylactic feeding vs standard care in patients with head and neck cancer

Background:

Weight loss remains significant in patients with head and neck cancer, despite prophylactic gastrostomy and intensive dietary counseling. The aim of this study was to improve outcomes utilising an early nutrition intervention.

Methods:

Patients with head and neck cancer at a tertiary hospital in Australia referred for prophylactic gastrostomy prior to curative intent treatment were eligible for this single centre randomised controlled trial. Exclusions included severe malnutrition or dysphagia. Patients were assigned following computer-generated randomisation sequence with allocation concealment to either intervention or standard care. The intervention group commenced supplementary tube feeding immediately following tube placement. Primary outcome measure was percentage weight loss at three months post treatment.

Results:

Recruitment completed June 2015 with 70 patients randomised to standard care (66 complete cases) and 61 to intervention (56 complete cases). Following intention-to-treat analysis, linear regression found no effect of the intervention on weight loss (10.9±6.6% standard care vs 10.8±5.6% intervention, P=0.930) and this remained non-significant on multivariable analysis (P=0.624). No other differences were found for quality of life or clinical outcomes. No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusions:

The early intervention did not improve outcomes, but poor adherence to nutrition recommendations impacted on potential outcomes.