Preoperative prognostic factors associated with poor early recovery after trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition arthroplasty for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes for Arthrodesis and Arthroplasty for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis in Female Workers

Background

Both arthrodesis and trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (T + LRTI) arthroplasty are reliable surgical procedures for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis. Here, we compared surgical outcomes between arthrodesis and T + LRTI for female workers aged over 40 years with thumb CMC osteoarthritis to determine an optimal procedure.

Patients and Methods

Fourteen thumbs of 13 patients who underwent arthrodesis with locking plates and 11 thumbs of 10 patients who underwent T + LRTI and were followed up for at least 12 months were retrospectively analyzed. For the two groups, we investigated the range of motion (ROM) of the thumb, grip strength, pinch strength, disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, Hand20 score, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain at 1-year follow-up and compared them between the two groups. In addition, we investigated surgical complications and resumption of work.

Results

Both procedures provided similar subjective outcomes in terms of Hand20 and VAS scores; however, arthrodesis provided significantly larger ROM of the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints of the thumb, grip and pinch strength, and DASH score, whereas T + LRTI provided a significantly better palmar abduction at 1-year follow-up. There were three and four postoperative complications in the arthrodesis and T + LRTI groups, respectively. One patient in the arthrodesis group had resigned, whereas two patients in T + LRTI had changed their jobs to less physically demanding ones postoperatively.

Conclusion

Both procedures satisfy female workers aged over 40 years with thumb CMC osteoarthritis. Nevertheless, arthrodesis can provide favorable outcomes that are equal to or better than T + LRTI.

Thumb basal joint arthritis in 2023

Thumb carpometacarpal or basal joint arthritis is the second most common location for osteoarthritis in the hand. It mainly affects women over 50years of age. Basal joint arthritis causes pain, loss of strength during pinch grips, and eventually stiffness and progressive deformity of the thumb column. Conservative treatment must be implemented first. It aims to spare the joint by using standardized methods. It must be initiated as soon as pain starts, not once the deformity has settled in. There is broad agreement that surgery is indicated when pain relief is not achieved after at least 6months of conservative treatment. The available surgical techniques can be classified as joint-sparing (extra-articular) and joint-sacrificing (intra-articular). The former consists of trapeziometacarpal stabilizing ligament reconstruction, subtraction osteotomy of the first metacarpal and thumb carpometacarpal denervation. The latter consists of trapeziometacarpal fusion, trapeziectomy (and its variants) and implant arthroplasty. Except in very specific cases, trapeziectomy and trapeziometacarpal implant arthroplasty with a total joint prosthesis or an interposition implant are the two main surgical techniques for treating basal joint arthritis. After reviewing the pathophysiology and the diagnosis of thumb basal joint arthritis, we will provide an overview of the available treatment options, with emphasis on the accepted surgical strategies in 2023. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition arthroplasty continuously improves hand functions up to 5-year postoperatively

INTRODUCTION

Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) arthroplasty is a reliable surgical procedure for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis, which provides good long-term outcomes. However, it remains unclear when the greatest benefit of this procedure can be obtained, and how long these benefits will continue. Therefore, we investigated the middle- to long-term advantages of this procedure by analysing the chronological changes in clinical outcomes by following the same patients from 1 year to a median 5 years after trapeziectomy with LRTI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen thumbs that completed consecutive clinical and radiographic evaluations preoperatively, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and median 5 years (range 4-8 years) after trapeziectomy with LRTI were included in this study. We investigated grip strength, pinch strength, range of motion (ROM) of the thumb, a visual analogue scale for pain, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, Hand20 questionnaire score, trapezial space height, and trapezial space ratio at every time point.

RESULTS

Hand strength (grip, pulp, and lateral pinch), palmar abduction, DASH score, and Hand20 questionnaire score were improved at 1 year postoperatively while the radial abduction showed significant improvement at the final follow-up. Moreover, pulp pinch strength, DASH score, and Hand20 questionnaire score continued to improve significantly from 1 year postoperatively to the final follow-up. Conversely, trapezial space height and ratio continuously decreased up to the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Trapeziectomy with LRTI consecutively improved the pinch strength, ROM of the thumb, DASH score, and Hand20 questionnaire score up to 5 years postoperatively. It also maintained the improvement of the other clinical outcomes up to 5 years postoperatively except for radiological findings.